THE ART of PAUL REED: Color, Creativity, Curiosity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE ART of PAUL REED: Color, Creativity, Curiosity THE ART OF PAUL REED: Color, Creativity, Curiosity David Gariff Color thinks for itself, independently of the objects that it clothes. — Charles Baudelaire Paul Reed1 at the age of ninety-one continues to make art in the basement studio of his Arlington, Virginia home. The studio opens up to the light and colors of the landscape behind his house, a gentle descending slope through trees to a small tributary of the Potomac River. Reed spends as much time outdoors as weather permits. His most recent paintings, washes and drizzles of paint stained on unstretched, raw muslin, illuminate the rooms of his house. Attached to his windows, they create a vision of modernist stained glass that serves to unify and blur distinctions between interior and exterior, light and color, art and nature. As if in homage to Matisse and Rothko, light and color enliven this domestic space and present a personal microcosm of the defining nature of Paul Reed’s artistic world. There is no more revealing setting to illustrate the goals and ideas that have motivated Reed’s lifelong devotion to the art of painting and his endless exploration of the many and varied properties of color. This in no way diminishes Reed’s accomplishments in sculpture, photography, printmaking, graphic design, and computer-generated imagery—all of which are part of a continuity of thought and an endless curiosity about art. Paul Reed’s journey is a long one. A native of Washington, D.C. he is best known as one 1 For the Paul Allen Reed papers, 1952‐2008, see the Smithsonian Archives of American Art, http://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/collection/reedpaul.htm. For an oral history interview with Paul Allen Reed, 1994 April 29, see http://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/oralhistories/oralhistory/reed94.htm 1 of the original artists of the Washington Color School.2 As with many artists, Reed’s career is characterized by many twists and turns along the way. After briefly attending college at San Diego State College (1936) and the Corcoran School of Art (1937), Reed found his way to New York City and employment as a magazine illustrator and graphic designer (1942-50). Reed’s time in New York during the 1940s coincided with the emergence of Abstract Expressionism. The achievements of New York School painters Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, Franz Kline, Barnett Newman, Mark Rothko, and Clyfford Still made a lasting impression on him. Reed returned to Washington in 1950 to open his own free-lance graphic design firm. His long-standing friendship with the painter Gene Davis3 (1920-1985), who Reed had known since junior high school, continued and the two men were frequent visitors to the National Gallery of Art and the Phillips Collection,4 as well as to a host of smaller private galleries then thriving in the area. Speaking about Gene Davis, Reed states: My chief stimulation in art at that time came from Gene Davis. We talked, exchanged books, saw each other often. He is an intelligent man and his ideas were always interesting; possibly of more meaning to me than his work was at the time.5 Another formative influence on Reed was the local artist, curator, and teacher Jacob 2 For a history of the Washington Color School, see C. Humblet, The New American Abstraction 1950‐1970, 3 vols., Milan, Skira, 2007, volume 2 contains the chapter on Paul Reed. See also K. Wilkin, Color as Field: American Painting, 1950‐1975, New York, American Federation of Arts, 2007. 3 See Jacquelyn D. Serwer, et al., Gene Davis, a Memorial Exhibition, Washington, D.C., National Museum of American Art, 1987. 4 These two Washington museums also influenced Morris Louis concerning color. The Chester Dale Collection of Impressionist and Post‐Impressionist paintings had recently gone on view at the National Gallery. The Phillips Collection was created, in part, around the formal element of color with works by important modernists including Paul Klee, Joan Miró, Milton Avery, Georgia O’Keeffe, and Arthur Dove. See E.A. Carmean, Jr., Morris Louis: Major Themes and Variations, Washington, D.C., National Gallery of Art, 1976, 3. See also Kimberly A. Jones and Maygene Daniels, The Chester Dale Collection, Washington, D.C., National Gallery of Art, 2009. 5 G. Nordland, The Washington Color Painters, Washington, D.C., Washington Gallery of Modern Art, 1965, 42. 2 Kainen (1909-2001). Kainen was an important conduit of information about abstract painting and the New York School for all young Washington artists at the time.6 In 1952, Reed turned his attention to painting. The influence of the American Abstract Expressionists shapes this early work. These small-scale experiments in oil, watercolor, enamel, and gouache on paper or masonite, Alpha (1952) and Platform I (1956) for example, are fluid and loosely painted in keeping with the spontaneity and vigor of the New York School. Platform I also explores the tension between a painterly field and a geometric form descending from the top edge of the frame, similar to the “push and pull” of tensions in paintings by Hans Hofmann and Robert Motherwell. This dialogue between color and structure, active and static elements, would become an important part of Reed’s vocabulary in later works. Also of importance for Reed at this time were the “Flag” and “Target” series by Jasper Johns that had recently burst on the art scene. The “Flag” paintings appeared to Reed as a daring venture with their edge-to-edge treatment of an iconic image, encaustic surfaces, and color alterations. With the availability of commercially produced acrylic paints, both magna (an acrylic resin paint) and water-based acrylics in the1950s, Reed began to explore the properties and working methods of staining or soaking colors into unprimed, cotton duck canvas. Here he built upon techniques already pioneered by Morris Louis7 (1912-1962), and Kenneth Noland8 (1924- 6 For an online transcript of an oral history interview with Jacob Kainen, 1982 August 10 – September 22, see The Smithsonian Archives of American Art, http://www.aaa.si.edu/collections/oralhistories/oralhistory/kainen82.htm 7 See John Elderfield, Morris Louis, New York, Museum of Modern Art, 1986. 8 See Karen Wilkin, Kenneth Noland, New York, Rizzoli, 1990 and Diane Waldman, Kenneth Noland: A Retrospective: the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum New York, New York, Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, 1977. The term “Washington Color School” can be misleading. Reed, for example, never knew Morris Louis personally. Louis died on September 7, 1962 at the age of forty‐nine at his home in Washington, D.C. 3 2010) in Washington who, in turn, had witnessed the stained paintings of Helen Frankenthaler9 in New York in 1953. The seminal Frankenthaler picture in this evolution was Mountains and Sea, 1952 (on long-term loan to the National Gallery of Art, Washington).10 By 1959, Reed was engaged in the staining process, allowing water-based acrylics to bleed and fuse into the surface of the canvas and respond to gravity to create floating, luminous, and optical fields of color. The center of the canvas is of particular importance in Reed’s first stained series, “Mandala.” (Mandala is the Sanskrit word for “circle.”) In works like #27 (1962) and 12C (1963) the circular designs of color appear to radiate outward from a central core. Centrality is reinforced by the square format of the supports (3’ x 3’ and 2’ x 2’ respectively). A feeling of expansiveness and luminosity characterizes these paintings as seemingly disembodied colors appear to shift and pulsate. One thinks of Kenneth Noland’s “Target” series, but in Reed’s “Mandala” paintings, it is as much about outward movement as inner focus. In both series, color interactions are at the heart of the effects, and lessons learned from important color theorists Josef Albers (1888-1976) and Ilya Bolotowsky (1907-1981) underpin the works.11 It was clear to many in the art world that something important was emerging from the painters in Washington, D.C. Much of the activity centered on the Washington Gallery of Modern Art (WGMA) near Dupont Circle, one of the first galleries devoted to contemporary art 9 See Julia Brown, After Mountains and Sea: Frankenthaler 1956‐1959, New York, Guggenheim Museum, 1998. 10 For a discussion of the impact of Mountains and Sea on both Morris Louis and Kenneth Noland, see Clement Greenberg, “Louis and Noland,” Art International, IV, 5, May 25, 1960, 26‐29. 11 Noland studied at Black Mountain College, near his hometown Asheville, North Carolina, when both Albers and Bolotowsky were faculty members there in the late 1940s. Paul Reed’s interest in colors placed in close proximity to each other owes much to Albers whose influential book Interaction of Color appeared in 1963. Reed also cites the writings of the nineteenth‐century theorist Michel Eugène Chevreul, notably his 1855 text The Principles of Harmony and Contrast of Colors, and Their Application to the Arts as important to him. 4 in the city. Established in 1961, the gallery officially opened to the public in November 1962 with a posthumous retrospective of Franz Kline’s work. Many New York School painters, including Helen Frankenthaler, Barnett Newman, and Mark Rothko attended the opening.12 The first director of the WGMA was Adelyn Breeskin. Among the shows organized during her tenure were exhibitions devoted to Arshile Gorky (1963), Ellsworth Kelly (1963), and Vincent van Gogh (1964). In June 1964, Gerald Nordland succeeded Breeskin. In 1965, Nordland curated an exhibition titled The Washington Color Painters. It featured paintings by six local artists considered the seminal figures in the new painting emerging from the city.
Recommended publications
  • THE WASHINGTON COLOR SCHOOL on View September 9, 2021 – October 23, 2021
    For Immediate Release EDWARD TYLER NAHEM PRESENTS PRIMACY: THE WASHINGTON COLOR SCHOOL On View September 9, 2021 – October 23, 2021 Opening Reception: Thursday September 9, 2021 (6:00pm– 8:00pm) (New York) – August 23, 2021 – Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art (ETNFA) is pleased to present Primacy: The Washington Color School, an exhibition curated by Dexter Wimberly of paintings by nine eminent Washington Color School artists: Cynthia Bickley-Green, Gene Davis, Sam Francis, Sam Gilliam, Morris Louis, Howard Mehring, Kenneth Noland, Alma Thomas, and Kenneth V. Young. The origin of the Washington Color School is linked to a 1965 exhibition titled The Washington Color Painters, organized by Gerald Norland at the Washington Gallery of Modern Art in Washington D.C. Five of the six artists in the original 1965 Washington Color Painters exhibition are included in Primacy. Artists of the Washington Color School are distinguished by their rejection of gesture in favor of flat, hard-edged planes of color, as seen in Gene Davis’s adroitly executed Red Dog (ca. 1961) and Morris Louis’s Number 19 (1962), two works in the exhibition that create optical effects and showcase the transcendent potential of painting. Hung next to Howard Mehring’s Blue Note (1964) and Kenneth Noland’s Untitled (1965), these deceptively simple compositions radiate dynamism and tension. In the vanguard of experimentation, the Washington Color School artists pushed boundaries with techniques and processes that would lead them to form individual but related styles, all of which emerged in reaction to Abstract Expressionism. This point of origin is clearly seen in the earliest work in the exhibition, Study for Moby Dick (1958) by Sam Francis, an artist associated with both the Abstract Expressionist movement and Post-Painterly Abstraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1995
    19 9 5 ANNUAL REPORT 1995 Annual Report Copyright © 1996, Board of Trustees, Photographic credits: Details illustrated at section openings: National Gallery of Art. All rights p. 16: photo courtesy of PaceWildenstein p. 5: Alexander Archipenko, Woman Combing Her reserved. Works of art in the National Gallery of Art's collec- Hair, 1915, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, 1971.66.10 tions have been photographed by the department p. 7: Giovanni Domenico Tiepolo, Punchinello's This publication was produced by the of imaging and visual services. Other photographs Farewell to Venice, 1797/1804, Gift of Robert H. and Editors Office, National Gallery of Art, are by: Robert Shelley (pp. 12, 26, 27, 34, 37), Clarice Smith, 1979.76.4 Editor-in-chief, Frances P. Smyth Philip Charles (p. 30), Andrew Krieger (pp. 33, 59, p. 9: Jacques-Louis David, Napoleon in His Study, Editors, Tarn L. Curry, Julie Warnement 107), and William D. Wilson (p. 64). 1812, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1961.9.15 Editorial assistance, Mariah Seagle Cover: Paul Cezanne, Boy in a Red Waistcoat (detail), p. 13: Giovanni Paolo Pannini, The Interior of the 1888-1890, Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon Pantheon, c. 1740, Samuel H. Kress Collection, Designed by Susan Lehmann, in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the National 1939.1.24 Washington, DC Gallery of Art, 1995.47.5 p. 53: Jacob Jordaens, Design for a Wall Decoration (recto), 1640-1645, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund, Printed by Schneidereith & Sons, Title page: Jean Dubuffet, Le temps presse (Time Is 1875.13.1.a Baltimore, Maryland Running Out), 1950, The Stephen Hahn Family p.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorful Language: Morris Louis, Formalist
    © COPYRIGHT by Paul Vincent 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED To UNC-G professor Dr. Richard Gantt and my mother, for their inspiration and encouragement. COLORFUL LANGUAGE: MORRIS LOUIS, FORMALIST CRITICISM, AND MASCULINITY IN POSTWAR AMERICA BY Paul Vincent ABSTRACT American art at mid-century went through a pivotal shift when the dominant gestural style of Abstract Expressionism was criticized for its expressive painterly qualities in the 1950s. By 1960, critics such as Clement Greenberg and Michael Fried were already championing Color Field painting for its controlled use of color and flattened abstract forms. Morris Louis, whose art typifies this latter style, and the criticism written about his work provides a crucial insight into the socio-cultural implications behind this stylistic shift. An analysis of the formalist writing Greenberg used to promote Louis’s work provides a better understanding of not only postwar American art but also the concepts of masculinity and gender hierarchy that factored into how it was discussed at the time. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my thanks Dr. Helen Langa and Dr. Andrea Pearson for their wisdom, guidance, and patience through the writing of this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Juliet Bellow, Dr. Joanne Allen, and Mrs. Kathe Albrecht for their unwavering academic support. I am equally grateful to my peers, Neda Amouzadeh, Lily Sehn, Kathryn Fay, Caitlin Glosser, Can Gulan, Rachael Gustafson, Jill Oakley, Carol Brown, and Fanna Gebreyesus, for their indispensable assistance and kind words. My sincere appreciation goes to The Phillips Collection for allowing me the peace of mind that came with working within its walls and to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-War & Contemporary
    Post-War & Contemporary Art New York I November 18, 2020 Bonhams Detail Lot 36 © 2020 Bonhams & Butterfields Auctioneers Takashi Murakami,Tongari-kun (Mr. Pointy) Costume, 2003 Corp. All rights reserved. Post-War & Contemporary Art New York | Wednesday November 18, 2020 at 1pm EST BONHAMS INQUIRIES IMPORTANT NOTICES COVID-19 SAFETY STANDARDS 580 Madison Avenue Jacqueline Towers-Perkins Please note that all customers, Bonhams’ galleries are currently New York, New York 10022 +1 212 644 9039 irrespective of any previous activity subject to government restrictions bonhams.com with Bonhams, are required to have and arrangements may be subject to [email protected] proof of identity when submitting bids. change. SALE NUMBER Failure to do this may result in your bid Andrew Huber not being processed. Preview: Lots will be made available 26107 +1 917 206 1633 For absentee and telephone bids for in-person viewing by Lots 1 - 49 [email protected] we require a completed Bidder appointment only. Please contact Registration Form in advance of the the specialist department on AUCTION INFORMATION Sheida Ellini sale. The form can be found at the +1 917 717 0367 or contemporary.us@ Ralph Taylor back of every catalogue and on our bonhams.com to arrange an +1 917 717 0367 2063659-DCA website at www.bonhams.com appointment before visiting our [email protected] Jacqueline Towers-Perkins and should be returned by email to galleries. In accordance with 2068426-DCA the specialist department or to the Covid-19 guidelines, it is mandatory PRESS INQUIRIES Rupert Banner Client Services department at bids.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Clark (A.K.A
    ARTIST MICHAEL CLARK: WASHINGTON April 3 – May 27, 2018 American University Museum at the Katzen Arts Center Washington, DC ALPER INITIATIVE FOR WASHINGTON ART FOREWORD Michael Clark (a.k.a. Clark Fox) has been an influential figure in the Washington art world for more than 50 years, despite dividing his time equally between the capital and New York City. Clark was not only a fly on the wall of the art world as the last half- century played out—he was in the middle of the action, making innovative works that draw their inspiration from movements as diverse as Pop Art, Op Art, Conceptual Art, Minimalism, and the Washington Color School. The result of this prolific and varied artistic oeuvre is that Clark’s output is too much for one show. After consulting with former Washington Post art critic Paul Richard, I decided Michael Clark: Washington Artist at the American University Museum would concentrate on his significant artistic contributions to the ‘60s, ‘70s, and ‘80s in Washington, DC. In line with his amazingly diverse and productive career, a conversation with Michael Clark is similar to drinking from a fire hose. In one sentence, he can jump from painting techniques using masking tape to making cookies for Jackie Onassis. My transcription of our conversation, presented here as a soliloquy, tries its best to maintain some kind of coherence and order, but in reality, I just tried to hold on for the ride. In contrast, the amazing thing about Clark’s art is how still, focused, and composed it is. The leaps and diversions of his lively mind are transmuted into an almost classical art, more Modigliani than Soutine, probably reflecting the time spent in his early years copying masterworks in the National Gallery of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin #3. Peeling Back Robert W. Newmann
    Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio by Antonia 1. 1 Dapena-Tretter dRoSte eFfeCT �BULLETIN 3 Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio 3 WaSHingtoN InStaLlation art: 1. 2 COlor ScHoOl SuBtracTive RoOts: The EaRly LaYeRs 24 ARROws 7 ImmaTeRial Embracing the ScUlPtureS: Literal: ADditive CoNCePtUal Layers 15 CONcluSiONs 38 Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio — by Antonia Dapena-Tretter Abstract Unpacking Robert W. Newmann's portfolio requires a layered approach with equal attention paid to biography, aesthetics, and the larger art market of the 1970s to the present. These diverse methodologies intertwine to reveal the artist's surprising rejection of the Washington 1. 3 Color School tradition of ethereal stained canvases in favor of the real space of large-scale installations. Literal layers—taking the form of pigment added to the canvas or inches of substrate sandblasted away— Bulletin 3 separate Newmann's art from that of his teachers and serve as a common thread, tying together enormous shifts in practice and medium. Although each period of the artist's oeuvre reinforces his strong attraction to the experiential, the unexpected challenges of wedding an artwork to the space around it ultimately drove Newmann to accept and embrace the unavoidable nature of the immaterial. Peeling Back Robert W. Newmann — Narrative Portfolio Washington Post critic Paul Richard theorized that 1960s D.C.-based artists such as Kenneth Noland, Thomas Downing, and Gene Davis «worked from a particular sensibility, nourished by the grids and circles of the original L’Enfant plan.»1 If this is taken to be true, the hard- edged lines of the Washington Color School canvases were born from the same inspiration as Robert Newmann’s For Pierre L’Enfant (pic.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Art and a Planned Giveaway
    54 ARCHIVES of AMERICAN ART JOURNAL | 57.1 fig. 9 Letter from Henri Ehrsam to Gene Davis, June 29, 1965. Henri Gallery Records, Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. first attempt to create the paintings, using local art students, so poor that he refused to put his name to them.40 McGowin ultimately enlisted Michael Clark (now known as Clark V. Fox), a recent graduate of the Corcoran School of Art and a skilled artist, to paint the fifty copies.41 The process of mass-reproducing Popsicle highlighted a hierarchy of labor in Giveaway, by which the physical production of the work was subordinate to its conception. Working on five canvases at a time, twelve to sixteen hours a day for nine days, and paid less than a skilled worker’s hourly wages plus meals, Clark painted all fifty works.42 Extant canvases bear the silkscreened names of the three event organizers followed by Clark’s original signature, with some—but not all—of the works also signed by Clark’s assistants ( fig. 10).43 In effect diminishing the painter and fabricators’ skill and artistic contributions, Douglas Davis declared “although his work is original and profound, in some ways Gene Davis is an easy copy.”44 Like Sturtevant’s repetitions, the copies of Popsicle were not exact.45 Mixing pigments to produce the exact hues of the original painting was challenging, given the brevity of Davis’s instructions.46 Moreover, at least one critic noted stylistic differences between Davis’s and Clark’s stripes; the older artist had been interested in how overlapping colors could produce faint effects of subtle vibration, but Clark did not have the luxury of letting one stripe dry before painting the next.47 Subtle aesthetic differences between the original and its reproductions produced fresh skepticism about a model of creative practice unable to see beyond the dichotomy of author and nonauthor.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick
    Diffusion: Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Elizabeth M. Gollnick All Rights Reserved Diffusion: Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick Abstract This dissertation redefines Los Angeles “light and space” art, tracing the multiple strains of abstract light art that developed in California during the postwar technology boom. These artists used new technical materials and industrial processes to expand modernist definitions of medium and create perceptual experiences based on their shared understanding of light as artistic material. The diversity and experimental nature of early Light and Space practice has been suppressed within the discourse of “minimal abstraction,” a term I use to signal the expansion of my analysis beyond the boundaries of work that is traditionally associated with “minimalism” as a movement. My project focuses on three women: Mary Corse, Helen Pashgian and Maria Nordman, each of whom represents a different trajectory of postwar light-based practice in California. While all of these artists express ambivalence about attempts to align their practice with the Light and Space movement, their work provides fundamental insight into the development of light art and minimal abstract practice in California during this era. In chapter one, I map the evolution of Mary Corse’s experimental “light painting” between 1964 and 1971, in which the artist experimented with new technology—including fluorescent bulbs and the reflective glass microspheres used in freeway lane dividers—to expand the perceptual boundaries of monochrome painting by manifesting an experience of pure white light.
    [Show full text]
  • A Finding Aid to the Thomas Downing Papers, Circa 1946-1995, in the Archives of American Art
    A Finding Aid to the Thomas Downing Papers, circa 1946-1995, in the Archives of American Art Rihoko Ueno 2018/01/10 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Biographical Material, 1949-1995............................................................. 4 Series 2: Correspondence, circa 1948-circa 1987................................................... 5 Series 3: Writings, 1969-1986.................................................................................. 6 Series 4: Personal Business Records, 1950-1986..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Davis (American Painter, 1920-1985)
    237 East Palace Avenue Santa Fe, NM 87501 800 879-8898 505 989-9888 505 989-9889 Fax [email protected] Gene Davis (American Painter, 1920-1985) Gene Davis, a painter associated with the Washington Color School Painters*, was a self-taught artist whose early work represented several phases of experimentation, including Abstract Expressionism*, Neo-Dada*, and Proto- Pop. Davis was born in Washington, D.C. in 1920. Spending most of his life there, he started painting at a very young age, as the artist himself explains to Buck Pennington in an interview: “I believe – when I was eight, nine years old, somewhere in that vicinity, I used to do little childlike drawings and I sent them in to the Washington Post 's"Children's Page" -- they had a regular "Children's Page" -- and they thought enough of them to publish several of them, one of which won a $1 prize, which was the thrill of a lifetime, of course, in those days. So my interest in visual art goes back to early childhood. And then I took -- I guess it was about a two- or three-hour-a-day drawing course, three times a week, in high school. But then there was a long hiatus there, where I was in the writing " At the age of 19 his first writing job was as a sports writer for the Washington Daily News, a paper that no longer exists. Between 1945 and 1950, Davis wrote for Transradio Press, covering the end of WWII as well as the Truman administration. He earned a living as a writer for close to 35 years before he felt successful enough as an artist to quit his job and to paint full-time in 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth Noland Circles—Early and Late (1959-1962/1999-2002)
    PRESS RELEASE KENNETH NOLAND CIRCLES—EARLY AND LATE (1959-1962/1999-2002) YARES ART 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151 (212) 256-0969 Opening reception: Saturday, November 11, 5:30–7:30pm Amusement Blues, 1961. Acrylic on canvas, 94 1/4 x 94 inches (232.4 x 238.8 cm). Courtesy Yares Art, New York. © The Kenneth Noland Foundation/Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY. YARES ART is pleased to present Kenneth Noland: Circles on view in New York, November 11–December 30. The exhibition comprises twenty major works by Kenneth Noland (1924 –2010), one of the most important American painters of the post-war era. The paintings on view feature Noland’s best-known motif: the circle, in which concentric forms in rich and varied colors radiate from within each square-format compo- sition. Linking Abstract Expressionist bravura to Color Field luminosity, Noland’s large-scale “Circle” canvases, such as This and That (both 1958–59), Amusement Blues, and Spring Call (both 1961)—included in the current Yares Art exhibition—caused a stir when the artist first introduced them to the art world in the early 1960s. Today, their far-ranging influence continues to resonate in the work of a younger generation of artists, including Ugo Rondinone, Anslem Reyle, among numerous others. Noland himself revisited the circle motif in the late 1990s, producing a series of relatively intimate hard-edge compositions with vibrant concentric circles, and heightened color relationships, often employing iridescent hues. This exhibition offers a rare opportunity to compare and contrast Noland’s first landmark series of “Circle” paintings with his last brilliant treatment of this theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Ludwig Kirchner's Shadow 1 MUSEUM
    1 MUSEUM DIGITAL ARCHIVE Loss and Restitution: The Story of the Grunwald Family Collection Ernst Ludwig Kirchner’s Shadow PETER H. FOX A major strength of the original Fred Grunwald collection is early twentieth-century German illustrated books. The resurgence of artistic interest in book design precipitated by Jugendstil is evident in Joseph Sattler’s vision of Germanic myth in Die Nibelunge (The Nibelunge, 1900) and Oskar Kokoschka’s fable Die Träumenden Knaben (The Dreaming Boys, 1908), while Expressionist impulses animate Wassily Kandinsky’s mystical Klänge (Sounds, 1913), Max Beckmann’s treatment of friend Kasimir Edschmid’s novel Die Fürstin (The Princess, 1918), and Ernst Ludwig Kirchner’s design for poet Georg Heym’s Umbra Vitae (The Shadow of Life, 1924) (fig. 1). Kirchner created numerous illustrations to literary texts throughout his career, starting with 1001 Nights in 1906–7, but his edition of Umbra Vitae is the most complete realization of his work in this genre. Unique to the Grunwald Center is a set of two bound volumes with 163 original woodcuts, drawings, and other illustrations by Kirchner, which were created from roughly 1919 to 1923 (figs. 2–3). Previously unaccounted for in the literature on the artist, these volumes present a new perspective on the significance of illustration for Kirchner’s artistic project. This essay explores Kirchner’s engagement with Umbra Vitae as a turning point in his oeuvre, a moment in which his desires to work through the trauma of World War I and control the reception of his art coalesced. Fig. 1. Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Umbra Vitae (The Shadow of Life, 1924).
    [Show full text]