Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick Diffusion: Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Elizabeth M. Gollnick All Rights Reserved Diffusion: Women Light Artists in Postwar California Elizabeth M. Gollnick Abstract This dissertation redefines Los Angeles “light and space” art, tracing the multiple strains of abstract light art that developed in California during the postwar technology boom. These artists used new technical materials and industrial processes to expand modernist definitions of medium and create perceptual experiences based on their shared understanding of light as artistic material. The diversity and experimental nature of early Light and Space practice has been suppressed within the discourse of “minimal abstraction,” a term I use to signal the expansion of my analysis beyond the boundaries of work that is traditionally associated with “minimalism” as a movement. My project focuses on three women: Mary Corse, Helen Pashgian and Maria Nordman, each of whom represents a different trajectory of postwar light-based practice in California. While all of these artists express ambivalence about attempts to align their practice with the Light and Space movement, their work provides fundamental insight into the development of light art and minimal abstract practice in California during this era. In chapter one, I map the evolution of Mary Corse’s experimental “light painting” between 1964 and 1971, in which the artist experimented with new technology—including fluorescent bulbs and the reflective glass microspheres used in freeway lane dividers—to expand the perceptual boundaries of monochrome painting by manifesting an experience of pure white light. In chapter two, I plot the development of Helen Pashgian’s plastic resin sculpture from her early pieces cast in handmade molds to her disc sculptures that mobilized the expertise of the faculty and aeronautical engineering technology available to her during an artist residency at the California Institute of Technology between 1969 and 1971. In chapter three, I chart the origins of Maria Nordman’s ephemeral post-studio practice using natural light from her early works that modified the architecture of her Los Angeles studio, to installations in which she excised sections of the walls or ceilings of commercial spaces and galleries, and finally to her project at the University Art Museum at the University of California, Berkeley for the 1979 Space as Support series, in which she turned the museum building into a container for the light of the summer solstice. The reception history I construct outlines how gender bias suppressed the contributions of women within the critical and historical discourse surrounding light-based work and minimal abstraction, while also exploring how women mobilized Light and Space’s interest in embodied perceptual experience as part of my wider analysis of the tactics deployed by women making abstract work before the discursive spaces of feminism and institutional critique were fully formed. Table of Contents List of Illustrations i Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Chapter One: White Light: Mary Corse and the Rise of California Light Painting 15 Chapter Two: California Color: Helen Pashgian and Plastic Resin Sculpture 90 Chapter Three: One Day Only: Maria Nordman at the University Art Museum 159 Epilogue 230 Works Cited 235 i List of Illustrations Chapter One: White Light: Mary Corse and the Rise of California Light Painting Figure 1.1 Photograph of Mary Corse taken for Artforum, 1969. Figure 1.2 Mary Corse, Untitled (Red/Blue), 1964. Acrylic paint on canvas. 78 x 52 inches. Figure 1.3 Mary Corse, Octagonal Blue, 1964. 93 ⅝ x 63 ⅞ inches. Silver metal flakes in acrylic paint on canvas. Figure 1.4 Mary Corse, Octagonal White, 1964. Acrylic paint on canvas. 93 x 67 ½ inches. Figure 1.5 Larry Bell, Homage to Baby Judy, 1960. Acrylic paint on canvas. 66 x 156 x 2 ¾ inches. Figure 1.6 Mary Corse, Hexagonal White, 1965. Acrylic paint on canvas. 80 x 48 inches. Figure 1.7 Mary Corse, Hexagonal Wt., 1965. Acrylic paint on canvas. 80 x 48 ¼ inches. Figure 1.8 Mary Corse, Untitled (Triangular Columns), 1965. Wood, joint compound, and acrylic paint. 98 ½ x 39 ¼ x 9 inches. Figure 1.9 Photograph of untitled light works in Mary Corse’s studio, 1968. Figure 1.10 Mary Corse, Untitled (White Light Series), 1966. Wood, Plexiglas, fluorescent tubes. 77 x 66 x 11 inches. Figures 11a-c Mary Corse, Untitled (Space Plexi + Painted Wood), 1966. Composition board, acrylic paint, and Plexiglas. a) 24 x24 x 2 ½ inches b) 24 x 24 x 4 ½ inches c) 24 x 24 x 6 inches. Figure 1.12 Mary Corse, Untitled, 1967. Argon, Plexiglas, generator, light tubes, monofilament. 72 x 72 x 10 inches. Figure 1.13 Photograph of Mary Corse in her studio, 1966. Figure 1.14 Photograph of tesla coil in Mary Corse’s studio, ca. 1968. Excerpt from Andy Eason and Mary Corse, White Light, 1969, film. Figure 1.15 Untitled (Space + Electric Light), 1968. Argon, Plexiglas, high-frequency generator, light tubes, monofilament. 45 x 45 x 4 ¾ inches. Figure 1.16 Untitled (White Light Grid Series-V), 1968. Glass microspheres in acrylic on canvas. 108 × 108 inches. ii Figure 1.17 Dan Flavin, the diagonal of May 25, 1963 (to Robert Rosenblum), 1963 fluorescent tube, 96 x 3 ¾ inches. Figure 1.18 Dan Flavin, icon V (Coran’s Broadway Flesh), 1962. Oil on cold gesso on Masonite, porcelain receptacles, pull chains, and clear incandescent “candle” bulbs. 41 ¾ x 41 ¾ x 9 ⅞ inches. Figure 1.19 Robert Irwin, Untitled, 1968. Synthetic polymer paint on aluminum and light. 60 ⅜ inches in diameter. Figure 1.20 James Turrell, Afrum (White), 1966. Projected light. Dimensions variable. Figure 1.21 Installation photograph of Doug Wheeler at the Pasadena Art Museum,1968. Figure 1.22 Doug Wheeler, Untitled, 1967. Canvas, acrylic paint, Plexiglas, and fluorescent light. Dimensions unknown. From Doug Wheeler, exhibition brochure, 1968. Figure 1.23 Mary Corse, Untitled (Light Painting), 1971. Glass microspheres in acrylic on canvas. 96 x 96 inches. Chapter Two: California Color: Helen Pashgian and Plastic Resin Sculpture Figure 2.1 Rembrandt van Rijn, A Scholar in his Study, ca. 1650-63. Etching on paper. Figure 2.2 Helen Pashgian, Untitled, ca. 1968-69. Cast polyester resin. 7 inches in diameter. Figure 2.3 Helen Pashgian, Untitled, 1969. Cast plastic resin and acrylic insert. Height: 8 3/8 inches; Diameter: 8 5/8 inches. Figure 2.4 Helen Pashgian, installation view of three untitled works, 1968-69. Photo by Pablo Mason. Figure 2.5 Helen Pashgian sanding a polyester disc during her artist residency at the California Institute of Technology, ca 1971. Figure 2.6 Helen Pashgian polishing a sculpture in the Baxter Art Gallery at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, ca. 1971. Figure 2.7 Donald Judd, Untitled, 1966. Galvanized iron and painted aluminum. 40 x 190 x 40 inches. Figure 2.8 Donald Judd, Untitled, 1969. Stainless steel with blue Plexiglas front and sides, ten units. 172 ¼ x 40 ¼ x 31 ¼ inches. Figure 2.9 Artists outside the Ferus Gallery in Los Angeles, 1959. Clockwise from top: Billy Al Bengston, Irving Blum, Ed Moses, and John Altoon. Photo by William Claxton. iii Figure 2.10 Poster for The Studs group exhibition at the Ferus Gallery in Los Angeles, 1964. Figure 2.11 Poster for Craig Kauffman at the Ferus Gallery in Los Angeles, 1962. Figure 2.12 Judy Chicago, Rainbow Pickett, 1965 (recreated 2004). Latex paint on canvas-covered plywood. 126 × 126 × 110 inches. Figure 2.13 Judy Chicago, Pasadena Lifesavers Red #5, 1970. Sprayed acrylic lacquer on acrylic. 60 x 90 inches. Figure 2.14 Judy Chicago, Domes #1, 1968. Acrylic lacquer inside clear acrylic domes. 5 x 10 inches. Figure 2.15 Judy Chicago, Grand Gala Smoke Extravaganza (alternatively known as Multi-Colored Atmosphere), 1969. Figure 2.16 Untitled exhibition announcement, Jack Glenn Gallery, Artforum 9, no. 2 (October 1970), 20. Photo by Jerry McMillan. Figure 2.17 Untitled advertisement, Artforum 9 , no. 4 (December 1970), 36. Figure 2.18 Cover of Los Angeles County Museum of Art’s A Report on the Art and Technology Program of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1967-1971. Figure 2.19 Miss Chicago and the California Girls, 1971. Poster produced by the Feminist Art Program, Fresno State College, California, 1970-71. Chapter Three: One Day Only: Maria Nordman at the University Art Museum Figure 3.1 Daniel Buren, Painting-Sculpture, in situ at the Sixth Guggenheim International, February 1970. Figure 3.2 Dan Flavin, untitled (to Ward Jackson, an old friend and colleague who, during the Fall of 1957 when I finally returned to New York from Washington and joined him to work together in this museum, kindly communicated), 1970. Daylight, pink, yellow, green, and blue fluorescent light. Two- and eight-foot fixtures. Figure 3.3 Maria Nordman, FILMROOM EAT, 1967-present. Two 16mm black and white films. Room with one door: 275 1/2 x 275 1/2 inches. Two projection walls: 108 x 144 inches. Table with white cloth: 36 x 48 x 48 inches. Figure 3.4 Maria Nordman, FILMROOM SMOKE, 1967-present. Two 16mm black and white films. Room with one door: 275 1/2 x 275 1/2 inches. Two projection walls: 108 x 144 inches. Armchair. iv Figure 3.5 Cover of Artforum 18, no. 7 (March 1980). Figure 3.6 Photograph of the exterior of Maria Nordman’s studio at 1014 Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, ca. 1972. Figure 3.7 Photograph of Maria Nordman’s Saddleback Mountain, 1973 at the University of California, Irvine. In Barbara Haskell and Hal Glicksman, Maria Nordman: Saddleback Mountain, n.p.
Recommended publications
  • THE WASHINGTON COLOR SCHOOL on View September 9, 2021 – October 23, 2021
    For Immediate Release EDWARD TYLER NAHEM PRESENTS PRIMACY: THE WASHINGTON COLOR SCHOOL On View September 9, 2021 – October 23, 2021 Opening Reception: Thursday September 9, 2021 (6:00pm– 8:00pm) (New York) – August 23, 2021 – Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art (ETNFA) is pleased to present Primacy: The Washington Color School, an exhibition curated by Dexter Wimberly of paintings by nine eminent Washington Color School artists: Cynthia Bickley-Green, Gene Davis, Sam Francis, Sam Gilliam, Morris Louis, Howard Mehring, Kenneth Noland, Alma Thomas, and Kenneth V. Young. The origin of the Washington Color School is linked to a 1965 exhibition titled The Washington Color Painters, organized by Gerald Norland at the Washington Gallery of Modern Art in Washington D.C. Five of the six artists in the original 1965 Washington Color Painters exhibition are included in Primacy. Artists of the Washington Color School are distinguished by their rejection of gesture in favor of flat, hard-edged planes of color, as seen in Gene Davis’s adroitly executed Red Dog (ca. 1961) and Morris Louis’s Number 19 (1962), two works in the exhibition that create optical effects and showcase the transcendent potential of painting. Hung next to Howard Mehring’s Blue Note (1964) and Kenneth Noland’s Untitled (1965), these deceptively simple compositions radiate dynamism and tension. In the vanguard of experimentation, the Washington Color School artists pushed boundaries with techniques and processes that would lead them to form individual but related styles, all of which emerged in reaction to Abstract Expressionism. This point of origin is clearly seen in the earliest work in the exhibition, Study for Moby Dick (1958) by Sam Francis, an artist associated with both the Abstract Expressionist movement and Post-Painterly Abstraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Helen Pashgianhelen Helen Pashgian L Acm a Delmonico • Prestel
    HELEN HELEN PASHGIAN ELIEL HELEN PASHGIAN LACMA DELMONICO • PRESTEL HELEN CAROL S. ELIEL PASHGIAN 9 This exhibition was organized by the Published in conjunction with the exhibition Helen Pashgian: Light Invisible Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Funding at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California is provided by the Director’s Circle, with additional support from Suzanne Deal Booth (March 30–June 29, 2014). and David G. Booth. EXHIBITION ITINERARY Published by the Los Angeles County All rights reserved. No part of this book may Museum of Art be reproduced or transmitted in any form Los Angeles County Museum of Art 5905 Wilshire Boulevard or by any means, electronic or mechanical, March 30–June 29, 2014 Los Angeles, California 90036 including photocopy, recording, or any other (323) 857-6000 information storage and retrieval system, Frist Center for the Visual Arts, Nashville www.lacma.org or otherwise without written permission from September 26, 2014–January 4, 2015 the publishers. Head of Publications: Lisa Gabrielle Mark Editor: Jennifer MacNair Stitt ISBN 978-3-7913-5385-2 Rights and Reproductions: Dawson Weber Creative Director: Lorraine Wild Designer: Xiaoqing Wang FRONT COVER, BACK COVER, Proofreader: Jane Hyun PAGES 3–6, 10, AND 11 Untitled, 2012–13, details and installation view Formed acrylic 1 Color Separator, Printer, and Binder: 12 parts, each approx. 96 17 ⁄2 20 inches PR1MARY COLOR In Helen Pashgian: Light Invisible, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 2014 This book is typeset in Locator. PAGE 9 Helen Pashgian at work, Pasadena, 1970 Copyright ¦ 2014 Los Angeles County Museum of Art Printed and bound in Los Angeles, California Published in 2014 by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art In association with DelMonico Books • Prestel Prestel, a member of Verlagsgruppe Random House GmbH Prestel Verlag Neumarkter Strasse 28 81673 Munich Germany Tel.: +49 (0)89 41 36 0 Fax: +49 (0)89 41 36 23 35 Prestel Publishing Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Overlooked Female Artists Suddenly Getting Market Attention
    The Long Overlooked Female Artists Suddenly Getting Market Attention observer.com/2018/03/art-market-report-armory-fair-sales-include-mary-corse-sheila-hicks/ Margaret Carrigan March 13, 2018 Work by Norwegian artist Vanessa Baird on view at the Armory Show. Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images Bad weather didn’t keep collectors away from the 2018 Armory Show, which closed March 11 after strong attendance over its five-day run. The fair’s overall sales gave no indication that the event opened just as the second nor’easter hit New England in under a week, canceling and delaying flights from inbound visitors across the world. One buyer, Thomas Yamamoto, even hopped a flight from Shanghai to New York early to peep a painting in person that he’d bought after seeing just a photo of it. The work in question is a fetching white monochrome from 2011 by Mary Corse, a foundational figure in the male-dominated Light and Space movement started in 1960s Los Angeles. And Corse wasn’t the only overlooked lady from the mid 20th century getting snapped up at the show. “Interest in female artists from the ’60s, ’70s and even the ’80s is high right now,” London-based gallerist Alison Jacques told Observer. Indeed, her Armory Show booth boasted a number of powerhouse women, including works by Ana Mendieta, Dorothea Tanning, Betty Parsons, Michelle Stuart and Sheila Hicks. Hicks studied at Yale, where she worked with legendary modernist Josef Albers and was a pioneer of textile art in the 1960s; now 83, the Nebraska-born, Paris-based artist is finally the subject of a major solo exhibition, at Paris’s Centre Pompidou.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum of Modern Art: the Mainstream Assimilating New Art
    AWAY FROM THE MAINSTREAM: THREE ALTERNATIVE SPACES IN NEW YORK AND THE EXPANSION OF ART IN THE 1970s By IM SUE LEE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Im Sue Lee 2 To mom 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to my committee, Joyce Tsai, Melissa Hyde, Guolong Lai, and Phillip Wegner, for their constant, generous, and inspiring support. Joyce Tsai encouraged me to keep working on my dissertation project and guided me in the right direction. Mellissa Hyde and Guolong Lai gave me administrative support as well as intellectual guidance throughout the coursework and the research phase. Phillip Wegner inspired me with his deep understanding of critical theories. I also want to thank Alexander Alberro and Shepherd Steiner, who gave their precious advice when this project began. My thanks also go to Maureen Turim for her inspiring advice and intellectual stimuli. Thanks are also due to the librarians and archivists of art resources I consulted for this project: Jennifer Tobias at the Museum Library of MoMA, Michelle Harvey at the Museum Archive of MoMA, Marisa Bourgoin at Smithsonian Institution’s Archives of American Art, Elizabeth Hirsch at Artists Space, John Migliore at The Kitchen, Holly Stanton at Electronic Arts Intermix, and Amie Scally and Sean Keenan at White Columns. They helped me to access the resources and to publish the archival materials in my dissertation. I also wish to thank Lucy Lippard for her response to my questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Clark (A.K.A
    ARTIST MICHAEL CLARK: WASHINGTON April 3 – May 27, 2018 American University Museum at the Katzen Arts Center Washington, DC ALPER INITIATIVE FOR WASHINGTON ART FOREWORD Michael Clark (a.k.a. Clark Fox) has been an influential figure in the Washington art world for more than 50 years, despite dividing his time equally between the capital and New York City. Clark was not only a fly on the wall of the art world as the last half- century played out—he was in the middle of the action, making innovative works that draw their inspiration from movements as diverse as Pop Art, Op Art, Conceptual Art, Minimalism, and the Washington Color School. The result of this prolific and varied artistic oeuvre is that Clark’s output is too much for one show. After consulting with former Washington Post art critic Paul Richard, I decided Michael Clark: Washington Artist at the American University Museum would concentrate on his significant artistic contributions to the ‘60s, ‘70s, and ‘80s in Washington, DC. In line with his amazingly diverse and productive career, a conversation with Michael Clark is similar to drinking from a fire hose. In one sentence, he can jump from painting techniques using masking tape to making cookies for Jackie Onassis. My transcription of our conversation, presented here as a soliloquy, tries its best to maintain some kind of coherence and order, but in reality, I just tried to hold on for the ride. In contrast, the amazing thing about Clark’s art is how still, focused, and composed it is. The leaps and diversions of his lively mind are transmuted into an almost classical art, more Modigliani than Soutine, probably reflecting the time spent in his early years copying masterworks in the National Gallery of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • IFA Alumni Newsletter 2017
    Number 52 – Fall 2017 NEWSLETTERAlumni Published by the Alumni Association of Contents From the Director ...............3 The Institute of Fine Arts Alumni Updates ...............20 in the Aftermath of the A Wistful ‘So Long’ to our Beloved May 4, 1970 Kent State Killings ....8 Doctors of Philosophy Conferred and Admired Director Pat Rubin ....4 in 2016-2017 .................30 Thinking out of the Box: You Never From Warburg to Duke: Know Where it Will Lead .........12 Masters Degrees Conferred Living at the Institute ............6 in 2016-2017 .................30 The Year in Pictures ............14 Institute Donors ...............32 Faculty Updates ...............16 Institute of Fine Arts Alumni Association Officers: Advisory Council Members: Committees: President William Ambler Walter S. Cook Lecture Jennifer Eskin [email protected] Jay Levenson, Chair [email protected] Susan Galassi [email protected] [email protected] Yvonne Elet Vice President and Kathryn Calley Galitz Jennifer Eskin Acting Treasurer [email protected] Susan Galassi Jennifer Perry Matthew Israel Debra Pincus [email protected] [email protected] Katherine Schwab Lynda Klich Secretary [email protected] Newsletter Johanna Levy Anne Hrychuk Kontokosta Martha Dunkelman [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Debra Pincus Connor Hamm, student assistant [email protected] History of the Institute of Fine Arts Rebecca Rushfield, Chair [email protected] Alumni Reunion Alicia Lubowski-Jahn, Chair [email protected] William Ambler 2 From the Director Christine Poggi, Judy and Michael Steinhardt Director Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Frick varied program. It will include occasional Collection, Museum of Modern Art, and a collaboration and co-sponsorship of exhibitions, diverse range of other museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin #3. Peeling Back Robert W. Newmann
    Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio by Antonia 1. 1 Dapena-Tretter dRoSte eFfeCT �BULLETIN 3 Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio 3 WaSHingtoN InStaLlation art: 1. 2 COlor ScHoOl SuBtracTive RoOts: The EaRly LaYeRs 24 ARROws 7 ImmaTeRial Embracing the ScUlPtureS: Literal: ADditive CoNCePtUal Layers 15 CONcluSiONs 38 Peeling Back RoBeRt W. NeWmanN �NarRatiVe PoRtfOlio — by Antonia Dapena-Tretter Abstract Unpacking Robert W. Newmann's portfolio requires a layered approach with equal attention paid to biography, aesthetics, and the larger art market of the 1970s to the present. These diverse methodologies intertwine to reveal the artist's surprising rejection of the Washington 1. 3 Color School tradition of ethereal stained canvases in favor of the real space of large-scale installations. Literal layers—taking the form of pigment added to the canvas or inches of substrate sandblasted away— Bulletin 3 separate Newmann's art from that of his teachers and serve as a common thread, tying together enormous shifts in practice and medium. Although each period of the artist's oeuvre reinforces his strong attraction to the experiential, the unexpected challenges of wedding an artwork to the space around it ultimately drove Newmann to accept and embrace the unavoidable nature of the immaterial. Peeling Back Robert W. Newmann — Narrative Portfolio Washington Post critic Paul Richard theorized that 1960s D.C.-based artists such as Kenneth Noland, Thomas Downing, and Gene Davis «worked from a particular sensibility, nourished by the grids and circles of the original L’Enfant plan.»1 If this is taken to be true, the hard- edged lines of the Washington Color School canvases were born from the same inspiration as Robert Newmann’s For Pierre L’Enfant (pic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Works of Maria Nordman by Laura Margaret
    In Situ and On Location: The Early Works of Maria Nordman by Laura Margaret Richard A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art and the Designated Emphasis in Film Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Julia Bryan-Wilson, Chair Professor Whitney Davis Professor Shannon Jackson Associate Professor Jeffrey Skoller Summer 2015 Abstract In Situ and On Location: The Early Works of Maria Nordman by Laura Margaret Richard Doctor of Philosophy in History of Art and the Designated Emphasis in Film Studies University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Julia Bryan-Wilson, Chair This dissertation begins with Maria Nordman’s early forays into capturing time and space through photography, film, and performance and it arrives at the dozen important room works she constructed between 1969 and 1979. For these spaces in Southern California, the San Francisco Bay Area, Italy, and Germany, the artist manipulated architecture to train sunshine into specific spatial effects. Hard to describe and even harder to illustrate, Nordman’s works elude definition and definitiveness, yet they remain very specific in their conception and depend on precision for their execution. Many of these rooms were constructed within museums, but just as many took place in her studio and in other storefronts in the working-class neighborhoods of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Milan, Genoa, Kassel, and Düsseldorf. If not truly outside of the art system then at least on its fringes, these works were premised physically and conceptually on their location in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • FRED SANDBACK Born 1943 in Bronxville, New York
    This document was updated on November 14, 2018. For reference only and not for purposes of publication. For more information, please contact the gallery. FRED SANDBACK Born 1943 in Bronxville, New York. Died 2003 in New York, New York. EDUCATION 1957–61 Williston Academy, Easthampton, Massachusetts 1961–62 Theodor-Heuss-Gymnasium, Heilbronn 1962–66 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, BA 1966–69 Yale School of Art and Architecture, New Haven, Connecticut, MFA SOLO EXHIBITIONS 1968 Fred Sandback: Plastische Konstruktionen. Konrad Fischer Galerie, Düsseldorf. May 18–June 11, 1968 Fred Sandback. Galerie Heiner Friedrich, Munich. October 24–November 17, 1968 1969 Fred Sandback: Five Situations; Eight Separate Pieces. Dwan Gallery, New York. January 4–January 29, 1969 Fred Sandback. Ace Gallery, Los Angeles. February 13–28, 1969 Fred Sandback: Installations. Museum Haus Lange, Krefeld. July 5–August 24, 1969 [catalogue] 1970 Fred Sandback. Dwan Gallery, New York. April 4–30, 1970 Fred Sandback. Galleria Françoise Lambert, Milan. Opened November 5, 1970 Fred Sandback. Galerie Yvon Lambert, Paris. Opened November 13, 1970 Fred Sandback. Galerie Heiner Friedrich, Munich. 1970 1971 Fred Sandback. Galerie Heiner Friedrich, Munich. January 27–February 13, 1971 Fred Sandback. Galerie Reckermann, Cologne. March 12–April 15, 1971 Fred Sandback: Installations; Zeichnungen. Annemarie Verna Galerie, Zurich. November 4–December 8, 1971 1972 Fred Sandback. Galerie Diogenes, Berlin. December 2, 1972–January 27, 1973 Fred Sandback. John Weber Gallery, New York. December 9, 1972–January 3, 1973 Fred Sandback. Annemarie Verna Galerie, Zürich. Opened December 19, 1972 Fred Sandback. Galerie Heiner Friedrich, Munich. 1972 Fred Sandback: Neue Arbeiten. Galerie Reckermann, Cologne.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art Economist December 2011 the Rise of Mary Corse and The
    The Art Economist December 2011 The Rise of Mary Corse and the Ecstasy of Silence By Drew Hammond At the age of eighty-five the great Basque sculptor, Nestor Basterretxea, gloriously remarked that, "Some call me a dinosaur, but I would rather be a dinosaur than a mosquito!" The art world has seen many mosquitoes whose buzz distracts our hearing, and who, for a moment during their brief lives, seem to absorb all our attention when they alight on us to suck our blood, leaving an unsightly and irritating reminder that time quickly effaces until another season and another generation of the short-lived. At Art Cologne, a famous Berlin dealer whom I shall not name confided that, "There were many times we knew that an artist or an artist group could only last three or four years. We built them up and they became pure phenomena of the market. We all made money, and then they disappeared in the market as we knew they would. Did we do something wrong? Perhaps the collectors eventually lost their investments, but for a while, they got what they wanted, which was to be seen as having the latest thing. At least the artists could get enough money to establish themselves in some other activity without starving first." Changes in art history and art market evaluations, while ever present, can assume many guises. And the pace of such changes can idle, coast, or accelerate at whiplash speed. Market evolutions can decisively affect even the prices of artists who have been producing work of consistent quality in a consistent price range for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Corse at LACMA: Painting Light and Space,” Ocula
    Paik, Sherry. “Mary Corse at LACMA: Painting Light and Space,” Ocula. 16 August 2019. Web. Mary Corse at LACMA: Painting Light and Space Exhibition view: Mary Corse: A Survey in Light, Los Angeles County Museum of Art (28 July–11 November 2019). Art © Mary Corse. Photo: © Museum Associates/LACMA. Mary Corse: A Survey in Light is an ideal title for Corse's major retrospective exhibition, now at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) (28 July–11 November 2019), that succinctly summarises her decades-long and ongoing experimentation with light. A Survey in Light debuted last year at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York (8 June–25 November 2018), and offers a comprehensive examination of the artist's key works from the early years of her career in the mid-1960s to 2011, organised at LACMA by Carol S. Eliel, the museum's senior curator of modern art. Corse, who was born in Berkley, California, in 1945, embarked on her formal training as a painter at Chouinard Art Institute (now California Institute of the Arts) in Los Angeles in 1964. There, she made her shaped canvases, which not only convey a desire to break off with the rectilinear format of traditional painting but also a nascent interest in the perceptual experience of light. In Untitled (Octagonal Blue) (1964), for example, Corse painted the octagonal canvas with a mixture of silver flakes and light-blue pigment to create a surface that reflects ambient light. Soon, the artist moved away from colours because they undermined the presence of light and painted, for the following decades, predominantly with white or black.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Space” and “Finish Fetish” Artists
    RARE OPPORTUNITY ON THE EAST COAST TO VIEW COMPREHENSIVE EXHIBIT OF WORK FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA-BASED “LIGHT AND SPACE” AND “FINISH FETISH” ARTISTS Light, Space, Surface Opens at the Addison Gallery of American Art on November 23, 2021 Features Artists Including Mary Corse, Bruce Nauman, Helen Pashgian, and James Turrell Andover, MA (August 12, 2021) – Light, Space, Surface: Works from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art will offer museumgoers the opportunity to experience a distinctly West Coast style of art on the East Coast, presenting the art of Light and Space and related “finish fetish” works with highly polished surfaces. The exhibition, which opens at the Addison Gallery of American Art on November 23, 2021, is one of the most comprehensive ever assembled of these artists and highlights works that explore perceptual phenomena via interactions with light and space. Drawn from the collection of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA), Light, Space, Surface features a wide range of media, from painting and sculpture to immersive environments. “It’s a privilege to be able to present this important period of American artistic innovation—often thought of as Minimalism with a uniquely Californian twist—here on the East Coast,” said Allison Kemmerer, the interim director of the Addison Gallery of American Art, Mead Curator of Photography, and senior curator of contemporary art. “Transforming the viewer from passive observer to active participant, the reflective surfaces, glossy finishes, and shimmering colors of these works demand
    [Show full text]