DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatial Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatial Strategy CHAPTER 3 – Spatial Strategy Paragraphs 3.1 – 3.3 This supporting text was responded to by 7 people/organisations. Support 0 Object 5 Comment 2 Overarching Summary The Plan is not ambitious enough – it should be a plan for the world in the 2020s. The garden communities provide the perfect opportunity for a sustainable local economy in the information age. The strategy is too focused on housing numbers at the expense of everything else. It is not clear when and where the houses are needed. Consider that a plan is needed, not a spatial portrait. The phrase garden communities conceals unpalatable truths. This plan is not sustainable due to the size and lack of infrastructure. The plan clearly does not respect the local character of Uttlesford and the villages to be directly affected by this plan, especially those nearby the West of Braintree site. Statutory consultees and other bodies Littlebury Parish Council – Uttlesford claims it wants to be one of the best places to live in the 2020s and beyond. The plan must be much more ambitious and embrace the world of the 2030s if it to achieve this. Aiming for a sustainable local economy in the information age should be a priority. The Plan should deliver world class broadband throughout the district, early development of new large employment sites to attract growing industries, development of a comprehensive network of non-fossil fuel transport links and build on the enviable local education provision to give young people a head start. The proposed new garden villages provide a perfect opportunity to do so. Stop Erosion of Rural Communities in Local Essex (SERCLE) – The strategy appears to be one of packing as many dwellings into an area as possible with total disregard for how the population will be supported in just about every respect. Developers/landowners/site promoters No responses from developers, landowners or site promoters. Individuals Whilst much is made of the numbers there is nothing about where or when the houses are needed, merely an average annual requirement of 641. Distribution is based on settlement hierarchy etc. but where is the evidence that shows when/ where the housing is needed? What is a spatial portrait? Surely it should be a spatial mission with a vision to provide to the people of Uttlesford? This is not a painting, it is a plan. Object to the statement that the spatial strategy sets out the principles of sustainable development. The proposals in this plan are not sustainable due to the size and lack of suitable infrastructure. The plan clearly does not respect the local character of Uttlesford and the villages to be directly affected by this plan, especially those nearby the West of Braintree site. Garden communities is a cuddly, woolly phrase, plannerspeak, to conceal unpalatable truths. Sustainability Appraisal June 2017 Not applicable Presumption in favour of sustainable development Paragraph 3.4 This policy and supporting text was responded to by 4 people and /organisations. Support 1 Object 1 Comment 2 Overarching Summary Some support for Paragraph 3.4. Suggest include reference to making the efficient use of previously-developed (brownfield) land in accordance with national policy. Concern that there are no priorities between different goals which could lead to conflicts and negative impacts on Uttlesford. Concern that development should be accompanied by local business growth and sustainable transport. Statutory consultees and other bodies No statutory consultees or other bodies responded to Paragraph 3.4. Developers/landowners/site promoters The general content and policy direction of Policy SP1 is supported. It is however noted that paragraph 3.4 defines the key criteria against which the sustainable credential of a development should be assessed. It is considered that the need to actively encourage developments to make the efficient use of land by promoting the re-use of previously developed (brownfield) land should be included within the text. In order for the supporting text and Policy SP1 itself to be compliant with national policy, and therefore pass the tests of soundness, it is suggested that the following text change is needed to paragraph 3.4 [suggested additional text shown underlined]: “… This includes: building a strong, competitive economy, making the efficient use of land by promoting the re-use of previously developed (brownfield) land, ensuring the vitality of town centres: supporting a prosperous rural economy, promoting sustainable transport; supporting strong vibrant and healthy communities and protecting and enhancing the natural, built and historic environment…” Individuals Support paragraph 3.4. The objective is laudable. Concerned that there has been a reduction in higher-wage, long-term job opportunities in the local town over the past years. The local plan should provide good incentive to revive local business with jobs provision together with housing developments. And transport infrastructure should be sustainable. Concerned that there are no priorities among different goals as there may be conflicts among them. A presumption in favour of development is only positive if the condition of the district is poor. But in Uttlesford, it is likely to destroy much of what makes Uttlesford attractive. Sustainability Appraisal June 2017 Not applicable Policy SP1 - Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy SP1 was responded to by 28 people and organisations. TOTAL Support 9 Object 9 Comment 10 Overarching Summary Clarification sought as to the definition of “sustainable development” and “presumption in favour of sustainable development” specifically for the local context. Suggestion that Policies S1 and S12 could be combined. Concerns raised regarding the following part of Policy SP1: ‘where there are no policies relevant to the application, or relevant policies are out of date at the time of making the decision, the Council will grant permission unless material considerations indicate otherwise’. The concern was that this position would undermine the Local Plan. Strong objections were expressed by Little Chesterford Parish Council, including assumptions for the stated housing numbers, the need to safeguard the separation of settlements, and the selection and delivery of the North Uttlesford Garden Village. Detailed wording changes suggested by a number of respondents. Concern that the audit trail for the Local Plan is incomplete particularly in relation to the Local Plan Sustainability Assessment process, including the transparency and availability of data, the interim SA Environment Report and some supporting decision-making evidence. Some support for the policy including from most of the landowners/ developers and Historic England. Some support for Paragraph 3.4. Suggest include reference to making the efficient use of previously-developed (brownfield) land in accordance with national policy. Concern that there are no priorities between different goals which could lead to conflicts and negative impacts on Uttlesford. Concern that development should be accompanied by local business growth and sustainable transport. Statutory consultees and other bodies CPREssex - Support for a shared, clear and meaningful understanding of what is meant by “sustainable development”. East Hertfordshire District Council - The positive and proactive approach taken in the Uttlesford Local Plan to ensure that the identified housing needs are met across the Plan period is endorsed by EHDC. The Plan exceeds the needs identified in the recent SHMA update of July 2017 by some 700 homes, thus building in an element of flexibility. Whilst East Herts Council is generally supportive of the Uttlesford Local Plan consultation document, the Council considers that there are a number of areas of the Plan that require amendment, either in order to make the Plan sound or for clarification and robustness purposes. Elsenham Parish Council - Elsenham Parish Council is concerned by the statement ‘Where there are no policies relevant to the application, or relevant policies are out of date at the time of making the decision, the Council will grant permission unless material considerations indicate otherwise’. This formulation suggests that the default position for an application not included within the Local Plan is that it should be accepted. The vast amount of work involved in producing and commenting on the Plan would thereby be rendered largely valueless. The ‘material considerations’ whereby an application might be rejected are too vague to be meaningful. The statement should be amended on the lines of, ‘Where there are no policies relevant to the application, or relevant policies are out of date at the time of making the decision, the application will be refused unless overwhelming reasons can be produced for its acceptance.’ Historic England - Policy SP1 states that the Council will take a positive approach that reflects the presumption in favour of sustainable development contained in the NPPF. Reference back to the meaning of sustainable development as defined by the NPPF is welcomed. Little Chesterford Parish Council - Little Chesterford Parish Council strongly object to the 2017 Uttlesford Local Plan: - The need for the stated housing numbers is based on unsound assumptions. - We urge UDC to include preserving separation of settlements in the spatial vision and policies to maintain and protect their distinctive character. - Policies that apply to housing development in Little Chesterford are unclear. - The spatial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies
    GB 0046 D/EHe Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 13892 The National Archives Material deposited on loan in Hertfordshire County Record Office by the Bishop'3 Stortford & Dist. Local History Society List reproduced by the Historical Manuscripts Commission 1969 HISTORICAL MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION NATIONAL REGISTER OF ARCHIVES Short Title of MSS HERTS, & ESSEX OBSERVER Name and Address Bishop's Stortford & Dist. Local History Society of Owner Name and Address Hertfordshire County Record Office of Custodian County.Hall, Hertford, Herts. Type of Accumulation Corres. re adverts., etc.; printing specimens How and where kept Condition of Documents Poor to fair Facilities for Students Apply. In writing to County Archivist INTRODUCTION TO CORRESPONDENCE The Herts. & Essex Observer was founded in 1861. less than a decade after the repeal of the tax on newspaper advertising (1853) gave a great stimulus to the local press. The material dealt with in this list falls into two categories: (l) letters concerning advertisements, including the texts of the advertisements themselves, and letters to the Editor, during the first decade or so of the paper'3 existence; and (2) printing specimens (posters, cards, etc.) from the office of H, Collings & Co., printers, and publishers of the Observer, during the same period. It 7/as handed to the Local History Society for preservation in recent years, and was sorted and listed, 1968-9 by two Committee members, Mrs. W. E. B. Ewbank, B.A., and Mr. G. Stew, under the supervision of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ryanair Buys Malta Air Startup to Target African Markets 11 June 2019
    Ryanair buys Malta Air startup to target African markets 11 June 2019 DAC overseeing the Irish group's main operations, Lauda for its Austrian-based business and Buzz, or Polish unit. Malta Air will now be the fourth division. "Ryanair is pleased to welcome Malta Air to the Ryanair Group of airlines which now includes Buzz (Poland), Lauda (Austria), Malta Air, and Ryanair (Ireland)," O'Leary added on Tuesday. "Malta Air will proudly fly the Maltese name and flag to over 60 destinations across Europe and North Africa as we look to grow our Maltese based fleet, routes, traffic and jobs over the next three years." © 2019 AFP Air Malta is Ryanair's ticket into more African markets Irish no-frills airline Ryanair said Tuesday that it will buy Maltese startup Malta Air, forming a new division that reaches more markets in north Africa from the Mediterranean island. "Ryanair Holdings ... today announced it has agreed to purchase Malta Air," the Dublin-based company said in a statement. The Dublin-based company will move its Malta- based fleet of six Boeing 737 aircraft into the new subsidiary. Ryanair will seek to increase the division's total fleet to ten aircraft over the next three years, creating some 350 jobs. The deal, whose value was not disclosed, is expected to complete at the end of June. The news comes as Ryanair overhauls its operations into distinct operations, mirroring a set- up by British Airways owner IAG. Under group boss Michael O'Leary will be Ryanair 1 / 2 APA citation: Ryanair buys Malta Air startup to target African markets (2019, June 11) retrieved 26 September 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2019-06-ryanair-malta-air-startup-african.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission Consultation on Electoral Arrangements for Uttlesford
    ITEM 10 – Local Government Boundary Commission consultation on Electoral arrangements for Uttlesford ELECTORAL WORKING GROUP held at COUNCIL OFFICES LONDON ROAD SAFFRON WALDEN at 7.00 pm on 30 MAY 2013 Present: Councillors R Chambers, J Davey and J Ketteridge. Also present: Councillors E J Godwin and D Morson as non-voting substitutes. Officers in attendance: J Mitchell (Chief Executive), L Bunting (Democratic Services Officer) and P Snow (Democratic and Electoral Services Manager). EWG1 APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN It was proposed that Councillor Chambers be appointed Chairman for the ensuing year. This was agreed. EWG2 APOLOGIES AND DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Apologies for absence were received from Councillor A Dean, J Freeman, M Lemon and J Rose. There were no declarations of interest. EWG3 MINUTES The Minutes of the meeting held on 12 December 2012 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. There was no business arising. EWG4 FURTHER ELECTORAL REVIEW (FER) The Democratic and Electoral Services Manager reported that the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) had published draft recommendations in April 2013 for the future electoral arrangements in the Uttlesford District. The consultation period would close on 8 July 2013. The Council meeting in July had been rescheduled to 1 July to allow time for any comments the Council wished to make and agree to any response to the LGBCE recommendations. The Democratic and Electoral Services Manager then went on to outline the differences between the published recommendations and the Council’s proposals. Chesterford and Elmdon The proposed separate single member wards of Chesterford and Littlebury and Elmdon and Wenden had been merged into a proposed two member ward to be named as Chesterford and Elmdon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wonderfully Stylish Period Home
    A wonderfully stylish period home Rodingbourne, Church End, Great Canfield, Dunmow, Essex CM6 1JT Freehold An abundance of charm and character yet not listed, next door to an 800 year old church • The interiors have been meticulously designed with some very stylish finishes and materials used throughout • The house offers a self- contained two bedroom annexe, ideal for an extended family • Set in wonderfully mature gardens of just under 1.75 acres with heated swimming pool, hot tub, pool house with sauna and garage block • Forms part of the historic Uttlesford Heritage Asset register and is within the Great Canfield conservation area Long Description To the other side of the kitchen Rodingbourne at Church End is is a substantial utility/wine/ the centre piece of this village boot room giving access to and is adjacent to the historic both front and rear of the parish church. Interior-wise the house but also connecting with house offers wonderfully the annexe. There are two flexible accommodation guest cloakrooms. arranged predominantly over Moving upstairs, there are two floors with a connected two staircases serving each annexe to the side which has wing of the house and independent access. providing independent The central reception hallway bedroom access if needed. The is part galleried with a landing current configuration provides above and connects with the five bedrooms with the master main reception rooms. These bedroom featuring a dressing include a formal drawing room, room and en suite bathroom. which is dual aspect with a The guest bedroom has its own large open fire place and much study and bathroom as well.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSEX. [KELLY's Pcbllc Houses-Continued
    • 684 PUB ESSEX. [KELLY'S PCBLlC HousEs-continued. Wbite Horse, Mrs. Sarab Olarke (exors. of), Sible Heding~ Waggon .& Horses, H. F. Coe, 39 East st. Saffron Walden ham, Halstead Waggon .& Horses,W .Howard,Twinstead,Sudbury(Suffik) White Horse, Charles Deal, Pleshey Waggon .& Horses, Henry Parrott, North hill, Colchester White Horse inu, John Deeks, Mundon, Maldon Wag-on .& Horses, William Worthy Holmes, New road, White Horse (The), W. G. Deeks, 25 Townfield st.Chlmsfd MistIey, Manningtree 'Vhite Horse,Mrs.H.Everitt,Layer Ma.rney,Kelvedon R.S.O Wake Arms, Percy Gearing, Upshire, Waltham Abbey White Horse, Henry Fox, High street, Brentwood Walnut Tree inn, F. W. Barker, Little Horkesley, Clchstr White Horse, William Dennis Golding, I High st. Ilford WarIey Arms, Henry Tate, Warley I'd. Gt.Warley,Brentwd iYhite Horse, John Hayter, Upper Dovercourt, Harwich Warren Wood House (The), J. Beckett, Epping Kew road White Horse, James Nelson Ramp, Dunmow. See advt Buckhurst Hill White Horse, Oswald M. King, Ashdon, Saffron Walden 'farwick Arms, Ernest Burkett, 185 High street, Maldon White Horse inn, Alfd. Little, Heath, Hatfield, Harlow Waterloo~ Enoch Pitchford, 169 Magdalen street, Colchestr White Horse, George Mansfield, Great Chesterford S.O Welcome Sailor, John Ewers, I Fullbridge, Maldon White Horse, A. Martin, West street, Coggeshall R.S.O 'Yellington,Frank S.Greenwood,I8 King-'s Quay st.Harwch White Horse inn, A. M. Mauldon & Son, Ballingdon, Sud- Welsh Harp, In. R. Saunders, lVlarket sq. Waltham Abbey bury (Suffolk) Westbury Arms hotel, A.E. Martin, 174 Ripple rd.Brkng 'White Horse, Thomas Newland, Starling's green, Claver- Western Arms, Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Canfield Contents
    GGrreeaatt CCaannffiieelldd VViillllaaggee DDeessiiggnn SSttaatteemmeenntt Virgin and Child (mid C13th) Mural in church of St Mary, Great Canfield Contents 4 Introduction 6 History 10 Great Canfield “End by End” 20 Building Design Centre Map of Great Canfield 24 Building Design (continued) 28 Development 30 Development Guidance 32 Landscape and Wildlife 35 Roads, Verges and Public Footpaths 38 Community 40 Commercial Activities 41 Great Canfield in Context 42 Your Property 44 Acknowledgements 3 Introduction What is a Village Design Statement? end when it may be too late to influence decisions. In order to involve rural communities in maintaining their character and managing How does the VDS work? change without altering the uniqueness of the area, the Government established the It describes Great Canfield in three main concept of a Village Design Statement ways: (“VDS”). • Our village in its setting • Our VDS gives a detailed description of the The development of the overall settlement existing character and main features of • design in Great Canfield – the things that The characteristics of the buildings and make it special for its residents. It spaces within the village identifies the physical qualities and characteristics of the village and the Each area of our village is different and the surroundings that are valued by local VDS helps the District Planning Officers people, and any particular aspects they appreciate this. would like to conserve and protect. Our VDS provides Design Guidelines. The VDS The VDS is intended to help protect has been considered within the context of visually important buildings and their the Adopted Local Plan to ensure that the settings, promote the use of appropriate Guidelines conform to Uttlesford District designs and building materials and protect Council’s planning policy and has been the rural lanes and open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex, Where It Remains to This Day, the Oldest Friends' School in the United Kingdom
    The Journal of the Friends Historical Society Volume 60 Number 2 CONTENTS page 75-76 Editorial 77-96 Presidential Address: The Significance of the Tradition: Reflections on the Writing of Quaker History. John Punshon 97-106 A Seventeenth Century Friend on the Bench The Testimony of Elizabeth Walmsley Diana Morrison-Smith 107-112 The Historical Importance of Jordans Meeting House Sue Smithson and Hilary Finder 113-142 Charlotte Fell Smith, Friend, Biographer and Editor W Raymond Powell 143-151 Recent Publications 152 Biographies 153 Errata FRIENDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY President: 2004 John Punshon Clerk: Patricia R Sparks Membership Secretary/ Treasurer: Brian Hawkins Editor of the Journal Howard F. Gregg Annual membership Subscription due 1st January (personal, Meetings and Quaker Institutions in Great Britain and Ireland) raised in 2004 to £12 US $24 and to £20 or $40 for other institutional members. Subscriptions should be paid to Brian Hawkins, Membership Secretary, Friends Historical Society, 12 Purbeck Heights, Belle Vue Road, Swanage, Dorset BH19 2HP. Orders for single numbers and back issues should be sent to FHS c/o the Library, Friends House, 173 Euston Road, London NW1 2BJ. Volume 60 Number 2 2004 (Issued 2005) THE JOURNAL OF THE FRIENDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY Communications should be addressed to the Editor of the Journal c/o 6 Kenlay Close, New Earswick, York YO32 4DW, U.K. Reviews: please communicate with the Assistant Editor, David Sox, 20 The Vineyard, Richmond-upon-Thames, Surrey TW10 6AN EDITORIAL The Editor apologises to contributors and readers for the delayed appearance of this issue. Volume 60, No 2 begins with John Punshon's stimulating Presidential Address, exploring the nature of historical inquiry and historical writing, with specific emphasis on Quaker history, and some challenging insights in his text.
    [Show full text]
  • DHL and Leipzig Now Lead ATM Stats 3 European Airline Operations in April According to Eurocontrol
    Issue 56 Monday 20 April 2020 www.anker-report.com Contents C-19 wipes out 95% of April air traffic; 1 C-19 wipes out 95% of April air traffic; DHL and Leipzig now lead movements statistics in Europe. DHL and Leipzig now lead ATM stats 3 European airline operations in April according to Eurocontrol. The coronavirus pandemic has managed in the space of a According to the airline’s website, Avinor has temporarily month to reduce European air passenger travel from roughly its closed nine Norwegian airports to commercial traffic and 4 Alitalia rescued (yet again) by Italian normal level (at the beginning of March) to being virtually non- Widerøe has identified alternatives for all of them, with bus government; most international existent (at the end of March). Aircraft movement figures from transport provided to get the passengers to their required routes from Rome face intense Eurocontrol show the rapid decrease in operations during the destination. competition; dominant at Milan LIN. month. By the end of the month, flights were down around Ryanair still connecting Ireland and the UK 5 Round-up of over 300 new routes 90%, but many of those still operating were either pure cargo flights (from the likes of DHL and FedEx), or all-cargo flights Ryanair’s current operating network comprises 13 routes from from over 60 airlines that were being operated by scheduled airlines. Ireland, eight of which are to the UK (from Dublin to supposed to have launched during Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh, Glasgow, London LGW, London the last five weeks involving Leipzig/Halle is now Europe’s busiest airport STN and Manchester as well as Cork to London STN).
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering Systems Division ESD
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace@MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering Systems Division Working Paper Series ESD-WP-2005-06 MULTI-AIRPORT SYSTEMS IN THE ERA OF NO-FRILLS AIRLINES Richard de Neufville Massachusetts Institute of Technology Engineering Systems Division [email protected] June 2005 Multi-Airport Systems In the Era of No-Frills Airlines Richard de Neufville* Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 (U.S.A.) [email protected] Abstract The development of no-frills airlines is promoting a remarkable expansion in the number of secondary airports in major metropolitan areas. These new carriers are creating a significant alternative to the traditional full-service carriers. In effect, they are establishing a parallel market and corresponding network of airports. This conclusion results from the analysis of a worldwide database on major metropolitan airports. This effect supplements the "number of originating passengers", that has been the traditional significant factor that promotes the establishment of viable multi-airport systems. This factor maintains its importance, but no longer is as decisive as it has been. Airlines and airport policies further reinforce the independent network of secondary airports. No- frills airlines that sell only through the web to customers effectively cause their services at secondary airports to disappear from the airline reservation systems. Airports that choose not to provide low-cost service to no-frills airlines likewise strengthen the role of the secondary airports. Such strategies, most visible in Europe, have led to a remarkable proliferation of secondary airports in unexpected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Governance Review Committee AGENDA
    Community Governance Review Committee AGENDA Wednesday, 12th July 2017 at 5.00 PM Council Chamber, Braintree District Council, Causeway House, Bocking End, Braintree, CM7 9HB THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC (Please note this meeting will be audio recorded) www.braintree.gov.uk Members of the Community Governance Review Committee are requested to attend this meeting to transact the business set out in the Agenda. Membership:- Councillor J Abbott Councillor Mrs J Pell Councillor P Barlow Councillor Mrs W Schmitt (Chairman) Councillor Mrs J Beavis Councillor R van Dulken Councillor Mrs D Garrod Councillor Mrs S Wilson Councillor Mrs J Money Members unable to attend the meeting are requested to forward their apologies for absence to the Governance and Members Team on 01376 552525 or email [email protected] by 3pm on the day of the meeting. A WRIGHT Acting Chief Executive Page 1 of 38 INFORMATION FOR MEMBERS - DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, Other Pecuniary Interest or Non- Pecuniary Interest Any member with a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, other Pecuniary Interest or Non- Pecuniary Interest must declare the nature of their interest in accordance with the Code of Conduct. Members must not participate in any discussion of the matter in which they have declared a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest or other Pecuniary Interest or participate in any vote, or further vote, taken on the matter at the meeting. In addition, the Member must withdraw from the chamber where the meeting considering the business is being held unless the Member has received a dispensation from the Monitoring Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • 20F Statement 2020
    As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2020 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F ☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended: March 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT/ TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report:___________ For the transition period from _________ to _________ Commission file number: 000-29304 Ryanair Holdings plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Ryanair Holdings plc (Translation of registrant’s name into English) Republic of Ireland (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) c/o Ryanair DAC Dublin Office Airside Business Park, Swords County Dublin, K67 NY94, Ireland (Address of principal executive offices) Please see “Item 4. Information on the Company” herein. (Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered American Depositary Shares, each representing RYAAY The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC five Ordinary Shares Ordinary Shares, par value 0.6 euro cent per share RYAAY The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (not for trading but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report.
    [Show full text]