The ATLAS High Level Trigger A. Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The ATLAS High Level Trigger A. Introduction VACHON, B.M.C. PIN 207385 1 The ATLAS High Level Trigger A. Introduction The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN will soon become the premier project in high-energy particle physics. The data to be recorded by the ATLAS experiment starting in 2008 is expected to revolutionize our understanding of the smallest constituents of nature and their interactions. Four decades of research have led to the development of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, a theory that has proved extremely successful at describing current experimental measurements over a wide range of energies. We have, however, not yet experimentally observed the existence of the predicted Higgs Boson, which is responsible for the breaking of the symmetry of the electroweak interaction into the more familiar electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces by generating mass for the elementary particles. Even with the discovery of the Higgs boson, the Standard Model seems to provide an incomplete description of nature at energy scales near 1 TeV. The ATLAS experiment is designed to discover the Higgs boson for any masses allowed within current experimental and theoretical constraints, as well as explore physics at energy scales where theories beyond the Standard Model strongly favour observable new physics. Major construction of ATLAS detector components is finished and the installation of these components in the ATLAS experimental area is nearly complete. The current emphasis of the ongoing work is in the areas of integration and commissioning of the detector and data acquisition systems. In addition to offline computing and physics studies, Canadians are playing leading roles in two distinct areas of the ATLAS experiment: the liquid argon calorimeter system and the High Level Trigger system. The ATLAS trigger is a system designed to identify, in real time, potentially interesting interactions out of the billions produced per second. A three-tiered system provides the necessary rejection to select approximately 200 Hz of collision data from the LHC beam crossing rate of 40 MHz. The first level of decision making is achieved using custom-built electronics and reduces the input data rate to approximately 100 kHz. The second and third levels of the trigger system, together referred to as the “High Level Trigger” (HLT), provide the additional three orders of magnitude rejection needed to reduce the data rate to permanent storage to a manageable level. The HLT consists of robust, time-optimized reconstruction algorithms running on commercial off-the-shelf computer components with demanding requirements on network data flow and management. To achieve the performance needed to fulfill the ATLAS physics program, it is estimated that the HLT will require the equivalent of nearly 20,000 computing units (CPU cores with a minimum clock speed of 2 GHz). Events that are not selected by the ATLAS trigger system are discarded, hence the performance of the trigger directly impacts the entire ATLAS physics program. Canadian groups, led by investigators who have joined ATLAS in the past few years, have contributed to the development of significant parts of the HLT. This includes the design and implementation of algorithms that can run in the specialized HLT framework, design and imple- mentation of benchmarks to assess HLT algorithm performance, and the deployment of an HLT testbed farm at McGill which is used for the evaluation of different hardware architecture config- VACHON, B.M.C. PIN 207385 2 urations and the detailed testing of algorithms. A summary of Canadian HLT activities is shown in Table 1. These contributions are strongly analogous to the prototyping and testing phase of detector construction, but do not yet include the capital funding necessary to complete the full system. The ATLAS HLT is not yet a fully funded project, and completing it is essential to the success of the ATLAS physics program. Although the complete HLT system does not need to be running from the first day of ATLAS data-taking since it will take a number of years for the LHC to ramp up to the full design luminosity, a significant increase in HLT capability between now and 2010 is required to avoid compromising the ATLAS physics program. The scope of this grant application is to request capital equipment funding for the purchase of HLT hardware components corresponding to an important fraction of the total system, on par with the significant, and still growing, Canadian contributions to the ATLAS HLT. The Canadian involvement on the ATLAS experiment has been supported via different sources of funding. The Canadian ATLAS group, with critical roles in the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeter system, received about $15M in NSERC funding for capital equipment for current ATLAS detector subsystems. This funding, together with the NSERC-funded ATLAS-Canada operating grant and computing support from CFI and provincial governments, places Canadians in a good position to be major players in ATLAS physics. The contributed levels of Canadian ATLAS funding per author to the initial detector construction were reasonable, although somewhat lower than other participating countries. Thus, additional Canadian capital contributions to ATLAS would not be out of scale. Since 2002, there has been 15 grant eligible researchers joining the Canadian ATLAS group, most of whom are new hires. The majority of these researchers were not part of the initial detector construction, but are now involved in complementary activities in the HLT. This more recent Canadian involvement further diversifies and increases the impact of Canadian contributions to ATLAS, thereby providing yet more opportunities for Canadian groups to take on leadership roles in the analysis of ATLAS data. While the HLT contributions are strongly analogous to detector construction contributions, there is an important difference to the way they are treated within the ATLAS collaboration. Contributions to the HLT, including the capital contributions requested here, do not imply additional contributions to the ATLAS construction common fund. In fact, ATLAS management has agreed that capital contributions to HLT computing hardware at CERN will count towards Canada’s construction common fund. We also note that the ATLAS experiment is a top priority in the recent NSERC Subatomic Physics long range plan, and funds were foreseen for ATLAS HLT capital contributions in the initial five-years (up to 2010) considered in that plan. B. Canadian HLT Involvement Canada’s participation in the High Level Trigger (HLT) has significantly increased over the past 3 years with the addition of new faculty in Alberta, Carleton, McGill and York and well as existing faculty moving to ATLAS at Montreal and Victoria. This has increased the number of faculty working on the HLT to 10, representing about 5 FTE. These are supported by 3 postdocs and 10 graduate students. In addition to this 5 undergraduate students, 3 with NSERC summer VACHON, B.M.C. PIN 207385 3 Investigators Activities ATLAS HLT Fraction Fraction David Asner Carleton Algorithm development/studies 75% 25% Georges Azuelos Montr´eal Algorithm development/studies 100% 10% Kamal Benslama Regina Data Quality / e-gamma slice 100% 30% Bryan Caron Alberta/TRIUMF remote farms 100% 30% Robert Kowalewski Victoria Algorithm development/studies 75% 60% Robert McPherson Victoria/IPP Monitoring/Data Quality 100% 20% RogerMoore Alberta remotefarms 100% 60% Jim Pinfold Alberta remote farms 100% 50% Steve Robertson McGill/IPP Alg.Devel/DQ/testbed studies 80% 50% Wendy Taylor York Algorithm development/studies 75% 20% Brigitte Vachon McGill Alg.Devel/testbed/management 100% 75% Table 1: ATLAS-Canada investigators currently active in areas relevant to the HLT, along with their fraction of research time spent on ATLAS and the fraction of their ATLAS time dedicated to the HLT. Also listed are their principal areas of activity in the HLT. student scholarships, have worked on the trigger effort to date. We expect the number of graduate students to grow by another 3 next year. ATLAS Canada’s role on the HLT is focused into four overlapping areas. (i) Trigger Algorithms, Performance and Menu (TAPM) Group This group is tasked with the development, tuning and validation of the various trigger recon- struction algorithms. The focus for the Canadian role within this group is built on the existing Canadian expertise in ATLAS calorimetry. ATLAS Canada is currently the dominant leader of the HLT jet slice with Canadians respon- sible for the software development, maintenance and validation, including the cluster algorithms, as well as the the jet trigger menu configuration for the Event Filter. In addition Canadians are involved in performance, calibration and pile-up studies. The entire ATLAS Jet slice effort is coordinated by B. Vachon who is the ATLAS HLT Jet convener and a member of the TAPM steering committee. Canadians are also working on the data access for the L2 missing ET algorithms. This is of the crucial aspects for this algorithm because the HLT trigger design at both the L2 and EF levels is based on regions of interest whereas missing ET algorithms require access to the entire detector’s calorimetry readout. The expertise gained from these tasks is already enabling Canada to have a direct impact on the ATLAS physics program with Canadians developing trigger criteria for the charged Higgs and top pair production triggers. This synergy between trigger algorithms and physics topics is one of the primary reasons for a strong Canadian participation in the trigger and as our involvement VACHON, B.M.C. PIN 207385 4 in the trigger matures we expect this effort to expand to include other physics topics aligned with the interests of Canadian physicists. As well as these specific contributions to the trigger algorithms Canada is playing a leading role in the technical testing of the trigger executables. One contribution in this regard was the use of Westgrid Linux farm for large scale testing of the monitoring and control framework.
Recommended publications
  • Physique Nucléaire Et De L'instrumentation Associée Introduction
    FR0108546 # DEA-DAPNIA-RA-1997-98 A il. ..33/04 -DSM Département d'Astrophysique, de physique des Particules, de physique Nucléaire et de l'Instrumentation Associée Introduction Motivés par la curiosité pour les connaissances fondamentales et soutenus par des investissements impor- tants, les chercheurs du vingtième siècle ont fait des découvertes scientifiques considérables, sources de retombées économiques fructueuses. Une recherche ambitieuse doit se poursuivre. Organisé pour déve- lopper les grands programmes pour le nucléaire et par le nucléaire, le CEA est bien armé pour concevoir et mettre au point les instruments destinés à explorer, en coopération avec les autres organismes de recherche, les confins de l'infiniment petit et ceux de l'infinimenf grand. La recherche fondamentale évolue et par essence ne doit pas avoir de frontières. Le Département d'astrophysique, de physique des particules, de physique nucléaire et de l'instrumentation associée (Dapnia) a été créé pour abolir les cloisons entre la physique nucléaire, la physique des particules et l'as- trophysique, tout en resserrant les liens entre physiciens, ingénieurs et techniciens au sein de la Direction des sciences de la matière (DSM). Le Dapnia est unique par sa pluridisciplinarité. Ce regroupement a permis de lancer des expériences se situant aux frontières de ces disciplines tout en favorisant de nou- velles orientations et les choix vers les programmes les plus prometteurs. Tout en bénéficiant de l'expertise d'autres départements du CEA, la recherche au Dapnia se fait princi- palement au sein de collaborations nationales et internationales. Les équipes du Dapnia, de I'IN2P3 (Institut national de physique nucléaire et de physique des particules) et de l'Insu (Institut national des sciences de l'Univers) se retrouvent dans de nombreuses grandes collaborations internationales, chacun apportant ses compétences spécifiques afin de renforcer l'impact de nos contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS E-M Calorimeter Resolution and Neural Network Based Particle Classification
    ATLAS E-M Calorimeter Resolution and Neural Network Based Particle Classification Summer 2004 REU Igor Vaynman Undergraduate California Institute of Technology John Parsons Kamal Benslama Mentors Columbia University August 16, 2004 Abstract The ATLAS detector is being built in CERN at the LHC. It is a gen- eral purpose detector that will be used for a variety of experiments, such as searching for the Higgs Boson. The electromagnetic calorimeter is a component of ATLAS responsible for measuring the energy deposited by e+, e−, and γ. This paper presents a study of the resolution of the E-M calorimeter using data simulated by GEANT 4. Also included is a study in the use of Neural Networks to classify particles, specifically e−/π±, using data from the E-M calorimeter. 1 Igor Vaynman Summer 2004 REU Report 1 Introduction 1.1 The ATLAS Detector The Large Hadron Collider currently being built in CERN will be able to collide protons at 14 TeV, and the ATLAS detector is being built to detect the result of such high energy collisions. Potentially, the detector will be able to find evidence for the Higgs Boson. The detector is built in multiple layers in order to detect all possible flavors of particles and thus accurately reconstruct the original event. The innermost layer measures the momentum of charged particles by applying a magnetic field and calculating the resulting curvature of the tracks using pixel detectors. Next is the electromagnetic calorimeter, which measures the energy of electrons, photons, and positrons, followed by the hadronic calorimeter which obtains the energy of protons, pions, and other heavier particles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 IPP Submission to the Canadian
    IPP Submission to the NSERC Subatomic Physics Long Range Planning Committee September 30, 2010 IPP LRP Brief Preparatory Group∗ Executive Summary: The Canadian particle physics community has continued to grow in numbers and scientific output over the last five years and is making substantial, internationally recognised, contributions in several areas. We review significant accomplishments of Canadian researchers, and offer a vision of the priorities for the community for the next five years. We identify four “essential” projects for the particle physics commu- nity in Canada over the next five years: ATLAS, DEAP, SNO+, and T2K. We identify four additional projects that have the potential to achieve essential status within the Canadian community over this time period: EXO, PICASSO, SuperB, and SuperCDMS. A long-term solution for funding SNOLAB oper- ations outside the NSERC SAP envelope is identified as the most critical structural issue for Canadian particle physics. We draw attention to the failure of the SAP envelope to grow in proportion to the growth of the community, funding limitations on TRIUMF’s ability to support new particle physics initiatives, and exploring a formal relationship between Canada and CERN. The IPP welcomes improved coordina- tion between the different funding mechanisms available to particle physics researchers in Canada. This would be an important first step to addressing many of the structural issues discussed here. ∗Including the current members of IPP Council: J. Farine (Laurentian), H. Logan (Carleton), R. Moore (Alberta), S. Oser (UBC), S. Robertson (McGill/IPP), R. Sobie (Victoria/IPP), W.Trischuk-Chair (Toronto); with the addition of N. Smith (SNO- LAB).
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Science Annual Report
    Faculty of Science Annual Report January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009 Faculty of Science University of Regina Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 www.uregina.ca/science/ Dean’s Comments raditionally our Annual Report begins with the Faculty’s Strategic Plan, Creating Our Future: 2005-2010. This year, Thowever, we begin with Dr. Katherine Bergman’s Summary Report, Toward Achieving Our Objectives. As Dean of Science during the creation and implementation of the Faculty’s current strategic plan, Dr. Bergman is eminently qualified to provide this assessment. As 2010 comes to a close, the Faculty will finalize its new strategic plan in keeping with mâmawohkamâtowin: Our Work, Our People, Our Communities, the University’s Strategic Plan for 2009-2014. 2009 was an exciting year at the University. There were budget and enrolment issues of great concern, but also visions of the coming years as we identified the priorities and actions needed in the first year of mâmawohkamâtowin. Science had an excellent year for student enrolment with credit hours up substantially. And, the long anticipated move began, with the opening of lab and office space for Science in the Research and Innovation Centre. “It remains for the Faculty to continue formulating goals and objectives and searching out means to further our reputation for excellence in both teaching and research…Our Faculty faces problems associated with static or declining enrolment, and the lack of resources to undertake some of the many projects we would like to deal with. Nevertheless, progress is being made in many respects.” These comments are a very accurate assessment of our current state.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS Long Range Plan 2005
    -1 0 The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider A Ten Year Plan for TeV Physics B. Caron, D.M. Gingrich, R. Moore, J. Lu, J. Pinfold, R. Soluk, J. Soukup University of Alberta D. Asner, M. Khakzad, G. Oakham, M. Vincter, Z.Y. Yang Carleton University D. Axen University of British Columbia S. Robertson, B. Vachon, A. Warburton McGill University G. Azuelos, G. Couture, C. Leroy, J.-P. Martin, R. Mehdiyev, N. Starinsky, P.-A. Delsart Universit¶ede Montr¶eal D.C. Bailey, P. Gourbonov, L. Groer, P. Krieger, C. Le Maner, R. Mazini, R.S. Orr, P. Savard, P. Sinervo, M. Cadabaschi, R. Teuscher, W. Trischuk University of Toronto D. O'Neil, M. Vetterli Simon Fraser University M. Losty, C.J. Oram, R. Ta¯rout, I. Trigger TRIUMF A. Astbury, A. Agarwal, M. Fincke-Keeler, R.K. Keeler, R.V. Kowalewski, R. Langsta®, M. Lefebvre, P. Po®enberger, R.A. McPherson, R. Seuster, R. Sobie, K. Voss University of Victoria S. Bhadra, W. Taylor York University November 20, 2005 1 2 Contents A. Introduction 3 B. ATLAS and Current Issues in Particle Physics 3 C. Comparison with Other Experimental Facilities 4 D. The ATLAS Experiment 5 E. Canadian Participation in the ATLAS Experiment 7 (i) ATLAS Canada Construction Projects . 7 (ii) The LHC . 8 (iii) ATLAS Commissioning . 9 (iv) Plans for ATLAS Physics . 10 (v) Future ATLAS Upgrades . 12 (vi) Role of Canadian Group in ATLAS Management . 13 (vii) Operating Funds . 14 (viii) Personnel . 15 (ix) New Projects . 20 (a) The High Level Trigger . 20 (b) ATLAS Beam Conditions Monitor .
    [Show full text]
  • UR Report Feb12 2007.Pdf (584.9Kb)
    91938_bi-weekly feb12 rep 2/7/07 12:14 PM Page 1 FEBRUARY 12, 2007 ISSN 1206-3606 Publications Mail Agreement #40065347 P1 RESTLESS RETIREMENT P2 BELIEVING IN LOVE P3 NARROWING THE GAP P4 CAMPUS WELLNESS The ATLAS Collaboration In ancient Greek mythology, The ATLAS experiment the Titan who held the heav- involves 35 countries, 164 ens on his shoulders to keep institutions and close to 2,000 them separated from the earth scientists. It is based at the was named Atlas. It’s appropri- Large Hadron Collider ate, then, that the titanic 35- (LHC), a new particle acceler- country ATLAS project ator located near Geneva, researching the nature of the Switzerland at CERN – the universe should bear the same world’s largest particle physics name. It’s also appropriate that laboratory. The $9.5 billion the University of Regina’s par- LHC is located 100 metres ticipation in ATLAS rests underground in a 16-mile mainly on the shoulders of long circular tunnel which one person – physics professor runs under the Franco-Swiss Kamal Benslama. border. Benslama, whose passion Inside the LHC tunnel, for the ATLAS project is readi- two particle beams will be ly apparent, maintains a more accelerated to extremely high modest view of his involve- (back row, left to right) Kamal Benslama, Katherine Bergman and Randy Lewis are energies, and then crashed ment in the experiment. excited about ATLAS and the possibilities it holds for the U of R. Ph. D student Gia Khoriauli into each other forty million “One person is really (bottom left) and post-doctoral fellow Meng Wang (bottom right) are two U of R researchers times per second.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Science
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE A NNUAL R EPORT January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006 (www.uregina.ca/science/) Faculty of Science University of Regina Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2 This document is available on our website: http://www.uregina.ca/science/ Format and Design: Marlene Miller and Catherine Kossatz Dean's Comments The Faculty of Science Strategic Plan Creating Statistics hosted Math Camp 2006 that attracted Our Future: 2005 - 2010 serves as the framework for participants from across the Province. Math Central is a guiding decision-making and resource allocation in community based interactive math website, which the Faculty.An executive summary of this document attracted significant financial support ($150,000 over follows. The Faculty faces the challenge of retaining 5 years) from Imperial Oil Foundation. Many of our new colleagues, who are shaping the research faculty members and students have been invited to directions and programs of the Faculty, in new and elementary and high school classrooms. Others have innovative ways, promoting both independent and given demonstrations and presentations to various integrated collaborative research and teaching community organizations or sit as board members or programs in the Faculty and the University, volunteers on a number of community based Provincially, Nationally and Internationally. Our organizations. The Faculty of Science is a continuing faculty members have attracted significant external supporter of the Saskatchewan Science Centre, and research and infrastructure funding through
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Standard Model Higgs Boson and Search for an Additional Scalar in the `+`−`+`− final State with the ATLAS Detector
    Observation of the Standard Model Higgs boson and search for an additional scalar in the `+`−`+`− final state with the ATLAS detector by Xiangyang Ju A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) at the University of Wisconsin{Madison 2018 Date of final oral examination: 03.15, 2018 CERN-THESIS-2018-019 15/03/2018 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Lisa L Everett, Professor, Physics Marshall F Onellion, Professor, Physics (material science) Kimberly J. Palladino, Assistant Professor, Physics Wesley H Smith, Professor, Physics Sau Lau Wu, Professor, Physics c Copyright by Xiangyang Ju 2018 All Rights Reserved i To my family ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I sincerely give my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Prof. Sau Lan Wu, for her patience, dedication and immense knowledge. It has been a great honor to join her prestigious group in particle physics. I am deeply grateful for all her contributions of time, ideas and funding that make my particle physics endeavor successful. Besides my advisor, I would like to thank the rest of my thesis committee: Prof. Lisa Everett, Prof. Marshall Onellion, Prof. Kimberly Palladino and Prof. Wesle Smith for their insightful comments and encouragement, but also for the hard questions which incented me to widen my research from various perspectives. I give my sincere deep thanks to Dr. Kamal Benslama, for educating me with the fundamental knowledge of particle physics, which, in turn, enabled me to start physics researches. I enjoyed the days and nights we spent in searching for the first candidates of W , Z boson and top-pairs using the ATLAS detector.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Cited Researchers (H>100) According to Their Google Scholar
    Highly Cited Researchers (h>100) according to their Google Scholar Citations public profiles H- RANK NAME ORGANIZATION CITATIONS INDEX 1 Sigmund Freud University of Vienna 269 488396 2 Graham Colditz Washington University in St Louis 264 256415 3 Eugene Braunwald Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Harvard Medical School 246 290831 4 Ronald C Kessler Harvard University 245 263006 5 Pierre Bourdieu Centre de Sociologie Européenne; Collège de France 242 528228 7 Solomon H Snyder Johns Hopkins University 240 216313 6 Michel Foucault Collège de France 237 690001 8 Robert Langer Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT 232 216122 9 Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University 230 315600 10 Eric Lander Broad Institute Harvard MIT 225 294683 11 Michael Karin University of California San Diego 223 210430 12 Gordon Guyatt McMaster University 217 187432 13 Michael Graetzel Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne 216 235390 14 Salim Yusuf McMaster University 214 248236 15 Richard A Flavell Yale University; HHMI 214 171241 16 Frank B Hu Harvard University 206 158298 17 T W Robbins University of Cambridge 206 130965 18 Carlo Croce Ohio State University 203 181398 19 Peter Barnes Imperial College London 202 178101 20 Eric Topol Scripps Research Institute 200 178348 21 A S Fauci National Institutes of Health NIH 200 168338 22 Chris Frith University College London 200 152183 23 Steven A Rosenberg National Cancer Institute NIH 199 164925 24 Kenneth Kinzler Johns Hopkins University 198 206590 25 Matthias Mann # Max Planck Gesellschaft MPG 196 175332 26 Karl Friston
    [Show full text]