Tools for Design, Interactive Simulation and Visualization For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tools for Design, Interactive Simulation and Visualization For Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science Vol nr Tools for Design Interactive Simulation and Visualization for Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Mo dels Vadim Engelson Linkoping University Electronic Press Linkoping Sweden httpwwwepliuseeacis PublishedonDecember by Linkoping University Electronic Press Linkoping Sweden Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science ISSN Series editor Erik Sandewal l c Vadim Engelson Typeset by the author using FrameMaker Recommended citation Author Title Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science Vol nr httpwwwepliuseeacis December This URL wil l also contain a link to the authors home page The publishers wil l keep this article online on the Internet or its possible replacement network in the future for a periodofyears from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances as describedseparately The online availability of the article implies apermanent permission for anyone to read the article online to print out single copies of it and to use it unchanged for any noncommercial rese arch and educational purpose including making copies for classroom use This permission can not berevoked by subsequent transfers of copyright Al l other uses of the article are conditional on the consent of the copyright owner The publication of the article on the date statedabove included also the production of a limited number of copies on paper which werearchived in Swedish university libraries like al l other written works publishedinSweden The publisher has taken technical and administrative measures to assure that the online version of the article wil l be permanently accessible using the URL statedabove unchanged and permanently equal to the archivedprintedcopies at least until the expiration of the publication period For additional information about the Linkoping University Electronic Pressanditsprocedures for publication and for assuranceofdocument integrity please refer to its WWW home p age httpwwwepliuse or by conventional mail to the address statedabove Abstract The complexity of mechanical and multidomain simulation mo d els is rapidly increasing Therefore new metho ds and standards are needed for mo del design A new language Mo delica has b een prop osed by an international design committee as a stan dard ob jectoriented equationbased language suitable for de scription of the dynamics of systems containing mechanical elec trical chemical and other typ es of comp onents However it is complicated to describ e system mo dels in textual form whereas CAD systems are convenient to ols for this purp ose Therefore we have designed an environment that supp orts the translation from CAD mo dels to standard Mo delica representation This tation is then used for simulation and visualization As represen sembly information is extracted from CAD mo dels from which a Mo delica mo del is generated By solving equations expressed in Mo delica the system is simulated We have designed several interactive D visualization to ols whichdisplay exp ected and ac tual mo del b ehavior as well as additional graphical elements for the purp ose of engineering visualization We applied this envi ronment for rob ot movement and helicopter ight simulation Supported by WITAS The Wal lenberg Laboratory for Information Technology and Autonomous Systems and by the European Commission via the REALSIM project Authors aliation Vadim Engelson Department of Computer and Information Science Linkoping University Linkoping Sweden 1 Contents 1 Background 2 1.1 Visualization Requirements Induced by Simulation Goals. 3 1.2 External Factors Important for Simulation Software and its Life Cycle . ................... 5 1.3 Structure of the report . ................... 6 2 Overview of Approaches to Dynamic Simulation of Mechanical Models 7 2.1 Multibody Simulation Tools . 8 2.1.1 ADAMS . ................. 8 2.1.2 Working Model 3D . 13 2.1.3 Integrated Environments for Computer-Based Ani- mation (3D Studio Max) . ........ 14 2.2 Equation-Based Simulation Tools . 16 2.2.1 SIMULINK/Systembuild . 16 2.2.2 Mechanical Packages for General Purpose Com- puter Algebra Systems . 17 3 Using the Modelica Language for Dynamic Analysis 18 3.1 Modelica . ........................ 18 3.2 Basic Features of the Modelica Language . 20 3.2.1 Implementation of Model Simulation . 22 3.3 Introduction to Modelica Syntax . 22 3.3.1 Introduction to the library of Electrical Components 22 3.3.2 Example . ................. 23 3.3.3 Using connectors . 24 3.4 Introduction to the Modelica Multibody System Library . 26 3.5 Using the MBS library . 29 3.5.1 Kinematic outline . ....... 29 3.5.2 Example: Kinematic Outline of Double Pendulum 32 3.5.3 Adding masses. 32 3.5.4 Adding Masses to the Double Pendulum Example. 32 3.5.5 Adding Geometrical Shapes . 34 3.5.6 Adding Shapes for Double Pendulum . 35 3.5.7 Interface to Non-Mechanical Parts of the Model . 36 3.6 Advantages of Using MBS for Dynamic Analysis . 37 3.6.1 Interpretation and Compilation in Mechanical Sim- ulation . ................. 37 3.6.2 Multidomain Simulation . 38 3.7 Difficulties of using the MBS library . 38 4 CAD Tools 38 4.1 CAD Tools and Dynamic Analysis . 39 4.2 Comparison of Various CAD tools . 40 4.2.1 SolidWorks . 40 4.2.2 Working Model 3D . 40 2 4.2.3 3D Studio Max . 41 4.2.4 Mechanical Desktop . 41 4.2.5 Pro/ENGINEER Tool Family . 43 5 Mechanical Model Design in SolidWorks and Model Transla- tion 45 5.1 Design of SolidWorks Parts and Assemblies . 45 5.2 Mating Example ....................... 45 5.3 Classification of mates . 46 5.4 Translation of mates into joints . 47 5.4.1 Multibody Systems with a Kinematic Loop . 48 5.5 User Interface for Configuration of Joints . 49 5.6 Mechanism Example – Crank model . 49 5.7 Mechanism Example – a Swing Model . 52 6 Structure of the Integrated Environment 57 7 Requirements for Visualization of Mechanical Models 60 7.1 Design Requirements . ................... 60 7.2 Usage Requirements . 61 8 MVIS - Modelica Interactive Visualization Tool 63 8.1 Offline and online Visualization Interfaces from Modelica . 64 8.1.1 Data Structures Used in Visualization . 64 8.1.2 Force and Torque Equations for Visualization Classes 67 8.1.3 Standard and New Classes for Visualization . 68 8.2 Rendering Properties and Design Aspects . 68 8.3 MODIC, Modelica Interactive Control Interface . 72 8.3.1 Interface for Output Values . 72 8.3.2 Interface for Input Values . 74 8.4 Synchronization Problem in the Interface for Input Values . 74 9 Modelica Visualization on the Internet 79 9.1 VRML-Based Simulation Visualization . ....... 80 9.2 Cult3D Approach . 83 9.3 Using 3DStudioMax . ................... 85 10 Conclusions 86 11 Acknowledgments 86 1 Background The use of computer simulation in industry is rapidly increasing. Simula- tion is typically used to optimize product properties and to reduce product development cost and time to market. Whereas in the past it was considered sufficient to simulate subsystems separately, the current trend is to simulate 3 increasingly complex physical systems composed of subsystems from mul- tiple domains such as mechanical, electric, hydraulic, thermodynamic, and control system components. In this chapter we concentrate on simulation of mechanical models, in particular, systems of multiple rigid bodies, as well as simulations where such models are major components in the simulated system. This means that flexible bodies, fluid and gas mechanics, molecular physics and some other simulation and visualization areas are outside the scope of this work. We define a simulation for our models as a particular execution of the software that given initial conditions and other input uses physical laws in order to reproduce the behavior of idealized physical models during some time span. 1.1 Visualization Requirements Induced by Simulation Goals. When discussing design, simulation and visualization issues it is useful to be goal oriented, since different goals can be set up. The goals can be either application- or tool-driven. The purpose of an application can for example be to optimize product properties and to reduce product development cost and time. This means that the simulation should be able to predict behavior of the system, or an- alyze what happened with some system in case of an unexpected behavior. The purpose of simulation tools is to provide adequate technology nec- essary for applications. In particular, tools should be tested for capabilities and performance requirements – whether these can handle complex models and demanding simulations. Of course, products will not become better and cheaper if they are just simulated. Attention should be paid to quality of simulation and availabil- ity of results. If there are too many inadequate assumptions and simplifi- cations, the simulation will be cheap, and may be fast, inaccurate and use- less. If the assumptions are adequate, all relevant details are taken into ac- count and everything possible is measured with highest degree of accuracy, simulation requires very complicated mathematical analysis, complex pro- gramming models, and is able to produce numerically correct results. Such simulations may require extremely high computational power and proceed very slowly; often it is very hard to predict the time needed for computa- tion. It might happen that these simulations are useless anyway - if the goal of simulation has been set incorrectly, or if results cannot be visualized in a comprehensible way. The efforts of simulation software designers are focusing on finding a golden middle way between the two mentioned extremes, finding the trade- off between the computing resources and computation accuracy. Several categories of general simulation goals are established; these goals can be described in a mathematical notation. Requirements for visu- alization of simulation results are depending on the goals of the simulation. F Assume that x is some input data for a simulation function , that produces x simulation results F . The simulation results for mechanical system are 4 movement trajectories (position, rotation, velocity, acceleration) of bodies as well as force, torque, pressure and other dynamically changing values.
Recommended publications
  • Optimation Optimizing Process Control with Dymola
    DS PLM SUCCESS STORY Optimation Optimizing process control with Dymola Overview Challenge Optimizing manufacturing processes define the strategies to run the mill or the Optimation needed to provide its Sweden’s Optimation helps companies to power plant at an optimum level and use customers with solutions that define optimize their manufacturing processes via simulation to test those strategies before they the optimal process control strategy for their production processes its expertise in control technology, dynamic are implemented in the real world.” simulation, and production processes. Solution Optimized process control can contribute to With Dymola, Optimation produces simulation Optimation uses Dymola to energy savings, better product quality, and results that mimic reality enabling its dynamically simulate the way a increased output. On the contrary, incorrectly customers to implement the most optimum controller should function for maximum structured and insufficiently configured configuration from the beginning. “I suppose operating capacity control systems lead to production downtime, we can say that we are control architects - we idleness or inefficiencies. Customers that turn define the optimum strategy and we create a Benefits to Optimation for process control optimization roadmap so that programmers have precise Thanks to Dymola, Optimation’s customers have a precise idea of the come from a variety of disciplines that include instructions on how to program a control way a process controller should be pulp mills, power plants, mining and steel. system,” said Eriksson. programmed before proceeding with physical modifications or installations Optimum configuration with Dymola A plant is an ensemble of hydraulic, Optimation uses Dymola, Dassault Systèmes mechanical, electrical systems. This is why multi-engineering modeling and simulation Optimation adopts a broad approach when solutions based on the open Modelica asked to optimize an existing plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Dassault Systèmes Products Lines Releases Support Life Cycle Dates for Licensed Program
    Dassault Systèmes Products Lines Releases Support Life Cycle Dates For licensed program © Dassault Systèmes | Confidential Information | 5/23/14 | ref.: 3DS_Document_2014 ref.: Information | | 5/23/14 © Dassault | Confidential Systèmes 3DS.COM Applicable as of - 9/13/2019 Dassault Systèmes - Customer Support Table of contents 1. 3DEXPERIENCE ........................................................................................................... 4 2. 3DEXCITE ..................................................................................................................... 5 3. BIOVIA ........................................................................................................................... 6 4. CATIA Composer ........................................................................................................... 8 5. CATIA V4 ....................................................................................................................... 9 6. CATIA AITAC ............................................................................................................... 10 7. DELMIA APRISO ......................................................................................................... 11 8. DELMIA ORTEMS ....................................................................................................... 12 9. DYMOLA...................................................................................................................... 13 10. ELECTRE & ELECTRE Connectors for V5 .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simulia Community News
    SIMULIA COMMUNITY NEWS #08 October 2014 THE POWER OF THE PORTFOLIO COVER STORY SIMULATION HELPS UPGRADE LONDON TUNNELS in this Issue October 2014 3 Welcome Letter Scott Berkey, Chief Executive Officer, SIMULIA 4 Portfolio Update Latest SIMULIA Portfolio Releases Deliver Powerful, Advanced Simulation Functionality to Users 8 Strategy Overview DR. SAUER How to Stay at the Top of Your Game in the Fast-Evolving 10 World of Simulation 10 Cover Story Dr. Sauer and Partners Helps Upgrade London Underground Station 13 News SIMPACK Joins the Dassault Systèmes Family 14 Case Study Stadler Rail Simulates Train Safety with FEA 17 Alliances Topology and Shape Optimization Using the Tosca-Ansa Environment 18 Case Study Fine-tuning the Anatomy of Car-Seat Comfort STADLER 20 Academic Update 14 Oil & Gas Subsurface Innovation with Multiphysics Simulations 22 Tips & Tricks Optimization Module Within Abaqus/CAE Contributors: Dr. Alois Starlinger (Stadler Rail), Dr. Alexander Siefert (Wölfel Group), Jeremy Brown and Randi Jean Walters (Stanford University), Parker Group On the Cover: Ali Nasekhian, Dr. techn., M.Sc. Senior Tunnel Engineer, Dr. Sauer and Partners Cover photo by Roger Brown Photography WÖLFEL 18 SIMULIA Community News is published by Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Rising Sun Mills, 166 Valley Street, Providence, RI 02909-2499, Tel. +1 401 276 4400, Fax. +1 401 276 4408, [email protected], www.3ds.com/simulia Editor: Tad Clarke Associate Editor: Kristina Hines Graphic Designer: Todd Sabelli ©2014 Dassault Systèmes. All rights reserved. 3DEXPERIENCE, the Compass icon and the 3DS logo, CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, ENOVIA, DELMIA, SIMULIA, GEOVIA, EXALEAD, 3D VIA, BIOVIA, NETVIBES, and 3DXCITE are commercial trademarks or registered trademarks of Dassault Systèmes or its subsidiaries in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Running an Abaqus Job on the Cloud
    SIMULIA COMMUNITY NEWS #18 December 2017 EMPOWERED BY THE CLOUD COVER STORY DIGITAL ORTHOPAEDICS 6 | DigitalAdmedes Orthopaedics In this Issue December 2017 3 Welcome Letter Bruce Engelmann, SIMULIA R&D VP & CTO 4 Future Outlook Accessing the Latest Simulation Technologies from SIMULIA on the Cloud 6 Cover Story Digital Orthopaedics: Feet in the Cloud 10 | The Living Heart 9 Solution Highlight A Simulation Tool that Connects the Dots on the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform 10 The Living Heart on the Cloud Growing Awareness of the Value of Modeling and Simulation for Life Sciences 12 Solution Update: Virtual Human Modeling on The Cloud Advance Biomedical Engineering Through Realistic Simulation 14 Tech Tip Running an Abaqus Job on the Cloud 12 | Virtual Human 15 Alliances Using Your SIMULIA Portfolio License on the Cloud Modeling 17 Vertical Applications Democratize Analysis using Simulation Vertical Applications 18 3DEXPERIENCE for Academia + SIMULIA Bringing Innovation and Industry into the Classroom Contributors: Parker Group & Digital Orthopaedics On the Cover: Mr. Eric Halioua, Dr. Thibaut Leemrijse, Dr. Bruno Ferré, Digital Orthopaedics Photo by: Couloir 3, Paris, France 18 | Academic SIMULIA Community News is published by Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 101W, Johnston, RI 02919, Tel. +1 401 531 5000, Fax. +1 401 531 5005, [email protected], www.3ds.com/simulia Editor: Tad Clarke Associate Editor: Kristina Hines Graphic Designer: Todd Sabelli ©2017 Dassault Systèmes. All rights reserved. 3DEXPERIENCE®, the Compass icon and the 3DS logo, CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, ENOVIA, DELMIA, SIMULIA, GEOVIA, EXALEAD, 3D VIA, 3DSWYM, BIOVIA, NETVIBES and 3DEXCITE are commercial trademarks or registered trademarks of Dassault Systèmes or its subsidiaries in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DS Reports 2008 First Quarter Software Revenue Growth Above 14% in Constant Currencies
    DS Reports 2008 First Quarter Software Revenue Growth Above 14% in Constant Currencies Paris, France, April 29, 2008 ─ Dassault Systèmes (DS) (Nasdaq: DASTY; Euronext Paris: #13065, DSY.PA) reported U.S. GAAP unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2008. Summary Financial Highlights Q1 GAAP total revenue up 12% on GAAP software revenue growth of 16%, both in constant currencies Q1 non-GAAP total revenue up 10% on non-GAAP software revenue growth of 14%, both in constant currencies Q1 EPS €0.34 on GAAP basis and €0.41 on non-GAAP basis DS reconfirms 2008 Business Outlook: reconfirms constant currencies non-GAAP software and non-GAAP total revenue growth objectives for 2008; reconfirms non-GAAP operating margin expansion objective for 2008; adjusts non-GAAP EPS growth objective for 2008 to between 6% and 10% growth solely due to US dollar weakness First Quarter 2008 Financial Summary U.S. GAAP Non-GAAP In millions of Euros, except per share data Growth Growth in cc* Growth Growth in cc* Q1 Total Revenue 307.4 6% 12% 307.9 4% 10% Q1 Software Revenue 269.1 9% 16% 269.6 8% 14% Q1 EPS 0.34 21% 0.41 5% Q1 Operating Margin 17.3% 22.8% * In constant currencies. Bernard Charlès, Dassault Systèmes President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Dassault Systèmes had a solid start to 2008, meeting all of our financial objectives for revenue, operating margin and earnings per share. We are seeing good dynamics in our core industries and new verticals. In particular, we had a very strong quarter for CATIA benefiting from broad-based demand among automotive and aerospace companies and good execution in our Business Transformation Channel for large accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Plants in Machine Automation Research and Development
    VTT-R-08126-13 RESEARCH REPORT ReUse-R Virtual plants in machine automation research and development Authors: Juha Kortelainen and Teemu Halmeaho Confidentiality: Public RESEARCH REPORT VTT-R-08126-13 1 (46) Report’s title Virtual plants in machine automation research and development Customer, contact person, address Order reference ReUse-R research project 40234/11 Tekes, Pekka Yrjölä Kyllikinportti 2, P.O. Box 69, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland Project name Project number/Short name Prosessinhallinnan suunnitteluratkaisujen uudelleenkäyttö 75303/ReUse-R Author(s) Pages Juha Kortelainen and Teemu Halmeaho 47/– Keywords Report identification code Automation, CAD, control system, hydraulic system, model- VTT-R-08126-13 ling, multibody system, simulation Summary Computational product development has become the mainstream methodology in modern product development. The same trend has been visible also in research, where computational methods have gained popularity beside the traditional approach relying on theory and experi- mentations. The objective of this project task was to study and demonstrate a realistic ap- proach for an industrial case to reuse existing mechanical design CAD model as the starting point and the template for mechanical system simulation using multibody system simulation, and to use this MBS model as a virtual test plant for automation and control system testing. In the report, the role of system modelling and simulation in the product process is first dis- cussed and some selected technologies, such as Modelica simulation language and Functional Mock-up Interface specification, are introduced. Then different possible implementations ap- proaches for a test environment of the control and automation system of a multi-technical sys- tem are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dymola Release Notes
    Dymola Dynamic Modeling Laboratory Dymola Release Notes Dymola 2021 The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Document version: 1 © Copyright 1992-2020 by Dassault Systèmes AB. All rights reserved. Dymola® is a registered trademark of Dassault Systèmes AB. Modelica® is a registered trademark of the Modelica Association. Other product or brand names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Dassault Systèmes AB Ideon Gateway Scheelevägen 27 – Floor 9 SE-223 63 Lund Sweden Support: http://www.3ds.com/support URL: http://www.Dymola.com Phone: +46 46 270 67 00 Contents 1 Important notes on Dymola .................................................................................................... 5 2 About this booklet ................................................................................................................... 5 3 Dymola 2021 ............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Additions and improvements in Dymola ................................................................................................ 6 3.1.2 New and updated libraries ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Developing a model ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dymola Dynamic Modeling Laboratory
    Dymola Dynamic Modeling Laboratory User’s Manual Dymola 6 Additions Version 6.0 © Copyright 1992-2006 by Dynasim AB. All rights reserved. Dymola™ is a trademark of Dynasim AB. Dymola® is a registered trademark of Dynasim AB in Sweden. Modelica® is a registered trademark of the Modelica Association. Dynasim AB Research Park Ideon SE-223 70 Lund Sweden E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.Dynasim.com Phone: +46 46 2862500 Fax: +46 46 2862501 Contents Recent features in Dymola.............................................................................................................9 Graphical editor..........................................................................................................................................................9 Parameter dialog.....................................................................................................................................................9 Package browser...................................................................................................................................................15 Component browser..............................................................................................................................................16 Replaceable components ......................................................................................................................................17 Connections..........................................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • MODELICA / DYMOLA and SIMULIA Abaqus Working Together
    MODELICA / DYMOLA and SIMULIA Abaqus working together | ref.: 3DS_Document_2012 3DS_Document_2012 ref.: ref.: || 6/29/2015 6/29/2015 Tomáš Ivančík SIMULIA Sales | Confidential Information || InformationInformation Confidential Confidential || [email protected] SystèmesSystèmes © Dassault Dassault Dassault © © 3DS.COM 3DS.COM MODELICA seminář 2015 26.6.2015 1 3DS Technologies | Broadening the Portfolio Simpack Simulation fe-safe For Product, Nature and Life Tosca Isight Multi-Body Fatigue Non-parametric Dynamics | ref.: 3DS_Document_2012 ref.: | Abaqus Process Optimization Integration & 6/29/2015 SolidWorks Simpoe Simulation Design Uniting the Optimization Virtual & Real SFE Worlds for All FEA Multiphysics Industries | Confidential Information | Information Confidential | Simulation Geensoft Plastic CATIA Molding Systèmes Analysis Dymola Conceptual © Dassault Dassault © System Engineering Simulation SolidWorks 3DS.COM CAD Design CATIA Simulation SIMULIA 2 What is Realistic Simulation? “Realistic Simulation” is a simulation that is physically realistic and “life like” in every way “Predictive Crashworthiness Simulation in a Virtual Design Process without Hardware Testing”, Jurgen Lescheticky, Hariaokto Hooputra and Doris Ruckdeschel, BMW Group, SIMULIA Customer Conference, May 2010 | ref.: 3DS_Document_2012 ref.: | 6/29/2015 Courtesy Mechanical Design and Analysis Corporation, 2010 SCC | Confidential Information | Information Confidential | Statistical distribution of impact damage Systèmes © Dassault Dassault © Courtesy of University
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3 Modelica Model 48 5.4 Simulations and Results 49
    Development of models for designing industrial energy technologies related to cold production and storage Master’s Thesis within the Sustainable Energy Systems programme RÉMI ALLET EDF R&D Department of Eco-Energy Efficiency and Industrial Processes Moret-sur-Loing, France Department of Energy and Environment Division of Heat and Power Technology CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2011 MASTER’S THESIS Development of models for designing industrial energy technologies related to cold production and storage Master’s Thesis within the Sustainable Energy Systems programme RÉMI ALLET SUPERVISOR(S): Stéphanie Jumel (EDF) Mathias Gourdon (Chalmers) EXAMINER Mathias Gourdon Department of Energy and Environment Division of Heat and Power Technology CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Göteborg, Sweden 2011 Development of models for designing industrial energy technologies related to cold production and storage Master’s Thesis within the Sustainable Energy Systems programme RÉMI ALLET © RÉMI ALLET, 2011 Department of Energy and Environment Division of Heat and Power Technology Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone: + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Experimental refrigerator of the E25 laboratories located at the research centre EDF Les Renardières, Moret-sur-Loing, France. Chalmers Reproservice Göteborg, Sweden 2011 Development of models for designing industrial energy technologies related to cold production and storage Master’s Thesis in the Sustainable Energy Systems programme RÉMI ALLET Department of Energy and Environment Division of Heat and Power Technology Chalmers University of Technology ABSTRACT Numerous industries use cold fluids in their processes. Large energy savings can be achieved through the efficient use of technologies such as refrigerators and cold storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Model Conversion to Modelica for Dymola-Based Mechatronic Simulation
    Automatic Model Conversion to Modelica for Dymola-based Mechatronic Simulation Automatic Model Conversion to Modelica for Dymola-based Mechatronic Simulation Tamás Juhász, M. Sc. and Ulrich Schmucker, Dr. Sc. techn. Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation, Magdeburg, Germany [email protected] and [email protected] Abstract some internal model parameters must be fine-tuned, according to model assessment or verification proc- Virtual product development allows us to recognize esses. This implies that an automated model conver- and evaluate the characteristics of a new product on sion is highly demanded in order to accomplish a the basis of simulation at an early stage without hav- good workflow. The designing engineer can inspect ing to build a physical model. Currently the most, the behaviour of the given virtual product by utiliz- widely spread commercial CAE systems do not offer ing a dynamic simulation of that. For a convenient direct support to external dynamic simulation appli- iterative workflow a solution have to be provided to cations. Conversely, dynamic simulation of a de- automate the conversion between the standard output tailed model is required to maintain good correlation format of the source CAD system and the input for- between the behaviour of the real product and its mat of the target simulator. virtual counterpart. In this paper it will be presented, In this article it will be presented that using Robot- that using a partially automated workflow a conven- Max , our .NET-based mechatronic model authoring ient Modelica model translation can be achieved and visualization application mechanical CAD data from the output of a mechanical CAD system, allow- from the widely-spread Pro/Engineer CAD environ- ing the final model to be extended independently ment can be imported, new mechatronic components with new elements from other simulation domains, can be added, thus multi-domain Modelica models considering Dymola-based multi-domain simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelica Evolution – from My Perspective
    Modelica Evolution – From My Perspective Hilding Elmqvist Dassault Systèmes Ideon Science Park, SE-223 70 Lund, Sweden [email protected] Abstract mathematical expressions. I was just studying com- piler technology, so I considered this project perfect This paper intends to tell the story of Modelica for me. The result was Simnon (SIMulation of NON- (www.Modelica.org) from the author’s perspective. linear systems): (Elmqvist, 1975, 1977a). A novel It is a fantastic saga that for me started in April 1976. feature was that a mixture of continuous time and The saga includes studying the needs, the original discrete time systems could be simulated, i.e. perfect idea, the development of a solution, waiting for ma- for simulation of sampled data control systems ture hardware technology, a start-up company, a fan- which were becoming very important at that time. tastic collaboration, an automotive company caring However, I was not satisfied with the approach as for its software supplier, how to get momentum by a basis for my PhD thesis, since it was based on standards collaboration, forming the right team, and submodels with inputs and outputs. I therefore want- the magic phone call from the right company. ed to investigate the fundamentals of modeling which my professor Karl Johan Åström supported. In Keywords: Simnon; Dymola; Modelica; Physical April 1976, I was studying a report with about 200 Modeling; DAE; Modelica Association pages about a drum-boiler model written by Sture Lindahl (Lindahl, 1976). The report was very sys- tematic, showing how the equations were organized 1 Introduction for the drum, the super heaters, the turbines, etc., i.e.
    [Show full text]