Part. V/ Signature of Author Christopher F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part. V/ Signature of Author Christopher F Ar&% -- - - - - - -- -Aw - - -- - - - , "' - I I - , - 1. COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES: CAN THEY SURVIVE THE REAL ESTATE RECOVERY? by Christopher F. Hughes Bachelor of Science University of Maryland (1984) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 1994 © Christopher F. Hughes 1994 The author hereby grants ty' IT permission to produce and to distribute publicly paper and electropc copjes of this thesi d9 9ument in whole or in part. v/ Signature of Author Christopher F. Hughes Department of Urban Studies and Planning July 31, 1994 Certified byC. Wheaton Professor of Economics Thesis Supervisor Certified by .c 1 " W. Tod McGrath Center for Real Estate Thesis Reader Accepted by William C. Wheaton Chairman Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOry 1OCT 04112-4 10it5BM COMMERCIAL MORTGAQE BACKED SECURITIES: CAN THEY SURVIVE THE REAL ESTATE RECOVERY? by Christopher F. Hughes Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on July 31, 1994 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ABSTRACT The real estate recession of the late 1980s and early 1990s resulted in a tremendous drop in real estate values. This condition led to much higher default probability or (outright default) of most real estate debt. As market values of real estate debt dropped, the portfolios of most traditional lending institutions were, at best, diminishing below book value and, at worst, causing these lending institutions to fail. As these institutions failed, their assets (mortgages) and liabilities (deposits) became the property and responsibility of the federal institutions which insured them. In order to liquidate a multi-billion dollar portfolio of distressed assets, federal insurers repackaged these assets into a new investment vehicle which appealed to a broader class of investors -- the commercial mortgage- backed security (CMBS). As the viability of the CMBS market became evident, solvent lending institutions began to use CMBSs to dispose their problem mortgages. Evidence of the feasibility of the CMBS came early in the form of substantial underwriting activity. CMBS issues jipmped from $4.6 billion in 1991 to $16.6 billion in 1992. As this market became established as a legitimate investment alternative for investors seeking to invest in real estate debt, the market began to attract non-distressed mortgage issues. This paper will look at the issues which shape the viability of the CMBS market. At its core, this paper will investigate whether the CMBS market can survive the withdrawal of federal agencies, as these agencies have virtually completed the sale of their problem mbrtgages. As federal agencies leave the CMBS market, a key question is whether other mortgage holders will be able to continue to supply economically viable commercial mortgages for securitization. Thesis Supervisor: William C. Wheaton Title: Professor of Economics Thesis Reader: W. Tod McGrath Center for Real Estate Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE ................................................... .... 4 I. Why Purchase Whole Commercial Loans?..................... ................ 4 II. Why purchase Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities?..... .... 10 C HA PTE R 2.............................................................................................................. 14 I. What is Securitized Debt (CMBS)...................................................... 14 Pass-Throughs................................................................................. 14 Mortgage Backed Bonds ................................................................ 15 Collateralized Mortgage Obligations............................................ 16 Real Estate Mortgage Conduits....................................................18 II. CMBS offering structures.................................................................. 19 C HA PTER 3............................................................................................................ 25 I. The Role of Rating Agencies in the CMBS Market........................... 25 II. Determining amount of Credit Enhancement...................................33 CH APTE R FO U R ................................................................................................... 41 The Future of the Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities Market..............................................41 I. Supply Side Analysis .................................................................. 45 Life Insurance Companies ................................................. 46 Owner/Developers ................................................................ 54 C onduits ............................................................................... 57 Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)....................... 62 Investment Banks..............................................................66 Commercial Banks ............................................................. 68 II. Demand Side Analysis ............................................................. 69 III. Additional CMBS Obstacles...................................................72 C O N CLU SION ....................................................................................................... 74 BIBLIOGRAPHY.......................................................................... 76 CHAPTER ONE As recently as several years ago investors interested in real estate debt had very few investment products from which to choose. Since that time, largely as a result of the severe real estate recession of the late 1980's, many new real estate investment alternatives have emerged to attract capital to the real estate market. With regards to the commercial real estate debt markets, investors have been historically limited to purchasing whole mortgages. Recently, a new investment alternative, commercial mortgage-backed securities, has experienced significant growth. This chapter will review the features of both whole mortgages and CMBS issues and explain why each has been attractive to investors. I. Why Purchase Whole Commercial Loans? Whole-loan commercial mortgages are a note secured by a lien on a real estate asset. Historically, investors have been drawn to this investment class as result of its risk-adjusted yield relative to comparable investment alternatives. Over the past ten years the spread between whole loan commercial mortgages and U.S. treasury issues of a like maturity has ranged from under 100 basis points to over three hundred basis points. A more meaningful interpretation of this data can be generated by extrapolating commercial mortgage data into an index form and then ~- comparing this index to indexes which track other comparable asset classes when defined in terms of risk. A common measure of risk is the standard deviation of returns. That is, how broad a range do the returns, from a given asset class, cover. As the graph below illustrates the standard deviation for commercial mortgages as measured by the Salomon-Levy Index II, an index which account for loss severity, compares favorable with the Salomon BIG index, which represents the corporate bond market. Standard Deviation and Risk-Adjusted Rate of Return Comparison 1983-1992 Standard Deviation Risk-Adjusted Return Salomon-Levy Index II 5.31 .880 Salomon Big Index 5.74 .774 Sources: Institutional Investor, Inc. Callan Associates, Inc. Quantitative Consulting Salomon Brothers Using data from the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), indexes have been generated for the commercial mortgage market. These indexes include the Solomon-Levy Index (S/L), which as shown above indicates that mortgages have historically performed significantly better than corporate bonds. In addition the S/L index, the Berkshire-Barnes Mortgage Index also looks at returns on commercial mortgages. When this commercial mortgage indexes is compared to Lehman Brothers corporate bond index, as well as Lehman Brothers Government/Corporate index, and Lehman Brothers treasury index, it to indicates that commercial mortgages offer a very attractive yield. This point is illustrated in the graph below. Average Annual Returns for Various Intervals 12.00% C:'.00% .E m [ 1-Year 5-Year 10-Year 20-Year L-B ||| L-B Corp. IMBBMI l L-B Gov/Corp. Treasurys Sources: L-B Gov/Corp: Lehman Brothers Goverment Corporate Index L-B Corp: Lehman Brothers Corporate Index BBMI: Bershire Barnes Mortgage Index L-B Treasury: Lehman Brothers Treasury Index It is important to note the spread between commercial mortgages and treasuries (illustrated below). As the incidence of default increased during the late 1980's and early 1990's the spread between commercial mortgages and treasuries increased. This was due to several factors including an increased default rate by commercial mortgagors and an increase increasing imbalance between the supply of and demand for mortgage credit; specifically, an unwillingness of the part of traditional lenders (life insurance companies and commercial banks) to lend, and an increased demand for funds stemming from the large volume of commercial loans scheduled for repayment over the same period. Quarterly Spread of Commercial Mortgages Over Comparable Treasurys w> 300 c: 250 a 200 c, 150 Co 100o 00 50 1983 1986
Recommended publications
  • Risk Analysis of Hedge Funds Versus Long-Only Portfolios
    Oct-01 Version Risk Analysis of Hedge Funds versus Long-Only Portfolios Duen-Li Kao1 Correspondence: General Motors Asset Management 767 5th Avenue New York, N.Y. 10153 E-Mail: [email protected] Current Draft: October 2001 1 Tony Kao is Managing Director of the Global Fixed Income Group at General Motors Asset Management. The author would like to thank Pengfei Xie and Kam Chang for their insightful research assistance. The author is grateful for many useful discussions with colleagues in the Global Fixed Income Group and constructive comments from Stan Kon, Eric Tang and participants at the “Q” Group Conference in spring 2001. 10/16/01 4:17 PM - 1 - Oct-01 Version Risk Analysis of Hedge Funds versus Long-Only Portfolios Introduction Despite the decade-long bull market in the 1990s and liquidity/credit crises in the late 90s, hedge fund investing has been gaining significant popularity among various types of investors. Total size of reported hedge funds increased four fold during the period 1994 to 20002. The Internet bubble and valuation concerns for global equity markets, especially among sectors such as telecommunications, media and technology, have provided additional catalysts for the soaring interest in hedge funds over the last two years. Institutional investors often use hedge funds as part of absolute return strategies in pursuing capital preservation while seeking high single to low double-digit returns. This strategy is primarily implemented by absolute return investors (e.g., endowments, foundations, high net-worth individuals). Allocations by corporate and public pension plans to hedge funds as a defined asset class is a recent phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Brinson Funds
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 485BPOS Post-effective amendments [Rule 485(b)] Filing Date: 1998-09-15 SEC Accession No. 0000950131-98-005221 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER BRINSON FUNDS INC Mailing Address Business Address 209 S LASALLE ST 209 S LASALLE ST CIK:886244| State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0630 CHICAGO IL 60604-1795 CHICAGO IL 60604-1795 Type: 485BPOS | Act: 33 | File No.: 033-47287 | Film No.: 98709961 8001482430 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES FILE NO. 33-47287 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FILE NO. 811-6637 FORM N-1A REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Pre-Effective Amendment No. | | ------ Post Effective Amendment No. 21 |X| ------ REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 | | Amendment No. 22 |X| ------ THE BRINSON FUNDS ================= (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) 209 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60604-1295 ----------------- ---------- (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code 312-220-7100 ------------ The Brinson Funds 209 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60604-1295 ---------------------------- (Name and Address of Agent for Service) COPIES TO: Bruce G. Leto, Esq. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, LLP 2600 One Commerce Square Philadelphia, PA 19103-7098 APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED PUBLIC OFFERING: AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT. IT IS PROPOSED THAT THIS FILING BECOME EFFECTIVE: |X| IMMEDIATELY UPON FILING PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (b) | | ON (DATE), PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (b) | | 60 DAYS AFTER FILING PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1) | | ON (DATE) PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1) ------ | | 75 DAYS AFTER FILING PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2) | | ON (DATE) PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (a)(2) OF RULE 485.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Securities Course Volume 1
    Canadian Securities Course Volume 1 Prepared and published by CSI 200 Wellington Street West, 15th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C7 Telephone: 416.364.9130 Toll-free: 1.866.866.2601 Fax: 416.359.0486 Toll-free fax: 1.866.866.2660 www.csi.ca Credentials that matter. Copies of this publication are for the personal use of Notices Regarding This Publication: properly registered students whose names are entered This publication is strictly intended for information and on the course records of CSI Global Education Inc. educational use. Although this publication is designed to (CSI)®. This publication may not be lent, borrowed provide accurate and authoritative information, it is to be or resold. Names of individual securities mentioned used with the understanding that CSI is not engaged in in this publication are for the purposes of comparison the rendering of fi nancial, accounting or other professional and illustration only and prices for those securities were advice. If fi nancial advice or other expert assistance is approximate fi gures for the period when this publication required, the services of a competent professional should was being prepared. be sought. Every attempt has been made to update securities industry In no event shall CSI and/or its respective suppliers be practices and regulations to refl ect conditions at the time liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or of publication. While information in this publication has any damages whatsoever resulting from the loss of use, data been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, such or profi ts, whether in an action of contract negligence, or information cannot be guaranteed nor does it purport other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with to treat each subject exhaustively and should not be information available in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Pricing Money: the Whole Book
    Pricing Money: the whole book This PDF contains the whole of the book Pricing Money, which is available from the web page www.jdawiseman.com/PricingMoney.html. This document is not quite free: there is a ‘price’. The price is a review (even if only a few words) on your preferred social media, tagged #PricingMoney. There was no paywall preventing download of this PDF, nor registration, nor even cookies, so this price cannot be enforced. Nonetheless, please be fair: please post a review or comment or acknowledgement, tagged or linked or both. Thank you. Preface to the online edition A little philosophy Readers with some experience of markets are asked to Pricing Money: A Beginner’s Guide to Money. Bonds, allow a philosophical observation. Futures and Swaps was written by J. D. A. Wiseman Different markets have different degrees of internal between autumn 2000 and April 2001, and was connectivity. published by Wiley in September 2001. On 15 A trader of $/¥ foreign exchange is really trading that November 2019 Wiley kindly reverted the copyright one number, in which huge size can change hands for back to the author. Following which, the original text minuscule dealing costs. There might also be positions is now published via in $/¥ options, so trading the distribution of the possible outcomes as well as the mean, but, again, it is www.jdawiseman.com/PricingMoney.html. about that one number. Minor typographical errors have been repaired, but Equities comprise many weakly-connected numbers. Consider Apple, Johnson & Johnson, J.P. Morgan, there have been no alterations that change meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortgage-Backed Securities—Are They Appropriate for Insurance Company Portfolios?
    RECORD, Volume 30, No. 2* Spring Meeting, San Antonio, TX June 14–15, 2004 Session 43PD Mortgage-Backed Securities—Are They Appropriate for Insurance Company Portfolios? Track: Investment Moderator: MARK W. BURSINGER Panelists: ROSS BOWEN ARTHUR FLIEGELMAN† LINDA LOWELL†† Summary: Insurance companies in the United States have, for many years, invested in mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The suitability of MBS for insurance company portfolios has been called into question by recent changes in interest rate volatility and increased capital requirements. MR. MARK W. BURSINGER: I work for AEGON USA in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. I'm also the chairperson of the Investment Section Council this year. The year of 2003 was certainly a period of historically low interest rates. Many of you probably saw the yields on your companies' portfolios declining much more rapidly than expected. Many of us found ourselves in the last year evaluating this impact on our current earnings, future earnings, reserve adequacy and possibly even capital. There are a number of reasons why yields dropped more than expected. I want to focus on "more than expected," because certainly in low- interest-rate environments we would always expect our yields to be lower. But those contributing factors could be things like portfolio turnover, prepayments on _________________________________ *Copyright © 2004, Society of Actuaries †Arthur Fliegelman, not a member of the sponsoring organizations, is vice president and senior credit officer at Moody's Investors Service in Jersey City, NJ. ††Linda Lowell, not a member of the sponsoring organizations, is managing director at Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., in Greenwich, Conn. Mortgage-Backed Securities 2 callable bonds and asset-backed securities.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Instincts: Life As an Entrepreneur, Financier, and Athlete
    7700++ DDVVDD’’ss FFOORR SSAALLEE && EEXXCCHHAANNGGEE www.traders-software.com www.forex-warez.com www.trading-software-collection.com www.tradestation-download-free.com Contacts [email protected] [email protected] Skype: andreybbrv CAPITAL INSTINCTS Life As an Entrepreneur, Financier, and Athlete Richard L. Brandt with contributions by Thomas Weisel John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2003 by Richard L. Brandt and Thomas W. Weisel. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, e-mail: [email protected]. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Sacramento County Employees’ Retirement System Sacramento, California A Pension Trust Fund for the County of Sacramento and Member Special Districts Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2002 Sacramento County Employees’ Retirement System Sacramento, California (A Pension Trust Fund for the County of Sacramento and Member Special Districts) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2002 Mission Statement We are dedicated to providing quality services and managing system assets in a prudent manner. Issued by: John R. Descamp Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey W. States Chief Investment Officer Kathryn T. Regalia, CPA Chief Operations Officer This page intentionally left blank. 2002 SCERS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2 Table of Contents Introductory Section Letter of Transmittal................................................................................................................... 6 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting.......................................... 10 Board of Retirement Members................................................................................................ 11 Organization Chart .................................................................................................................. 12 Participating Employers........................................................................................................... 13 Professional Consultants........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Volatility Funds by Morningstar Investment Management
    Corso di Laurea magistrale in Amministrazione, finanza e controllo Tesi di Laurea Managed Volatility Funds By Morningstar Investment Management Relatore Chiar. ma Prof. ssa Elisa Cavezzali Correlatore Chiar. mo Prof. Ugo Rigoni Laureanda Cristina Borghilli Matricola 823589 Anno Accademico 2013 / 2014 1 Table of contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……………………...…p.6 Chapter 1 –MUTUAL FUNDS................................................................................p.10 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................p.10 1.2 Asset management ……………………………………………………………………p.11 1.2.1 Asset management definition......................................................................p.11 1.2.2 The asset management market in Italy…………………………...………..…p.13 1.2.3 A global comparison……………………………………………………....……p.17 1.3 Mutual funds………………………………………………………………...………...p.18 1.3.1 Mutual funds definition ……………………………………..….………….…..p.18 1.3.2 Main actors in the market of mutual funds…………………………...……...p.19 1.3.3 The scenario of development of mutual funds…………………………….…p.21 1.3.4 Mutual funds in Italy……………………………………………………..……..p.24 1.3.5 Advantages of mutual funds……………………………………………………p.25 1.4 Categories and costs of mutual funds and life insurance plans….………….….p.27 1.4.1 Mutual funds classification in Italy……..…………………….……..............p.27 1.4.2 Other categories of mutual funds………………...……………….…………..p.32 1.4.3 Mutual funds costs……………………………..………..………………...……p.35 1.4.4 The binomial insurance-mutual
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2004 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Celebrating Service Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois a component unit of the State of Illinois 1939 - 2004 Statement of Purpose Retirement Security for Illinois Educators Fiscal Year Highlights 2004 2003 Active contributing members 157,990 152,117 Inactive noncontributing members 89,641 86,279 Benefit recipients 76,905 73,431 Total membership 324,536 311,827 Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $50,947,451,000 $46,933,432,000 Less net assets held in trust for pension benefits 31,544,729,000 23,124,823,000 Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $19,402,722,000 $23,808,609,000 Funded ratio 61.9% 49.3% (actuarial value of assets/AAL) Total fund investment return, net of fees 16.5% 4.9% Benefits and refunds paid Benefits paid $2,262,329,479 $1,998,622,284 Refunds paid 48,019,644 43,114,742 Total $2,310,349,123 $2,041,737,026 Income Member contributions* $768,661,300 $732,020,451 Employer contributions 1,159,051,290 1,021,262,225 (includes State of Illinois contributions) State of Illinois pension obligation bond proceeds 4,330,373,948 N/A Total investment income 4,485,729,345 1,060,852,111 Total $10,743,815,883 $2,814,134,787 * Includes member payments and accounts receivable under the Payroll Deduction Program. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 Photo courtesy of Sangamon Valley Collection at Lincoln Library Springfield Griggs School — 1942 Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois A Component Unit of the State of Illinois P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • LEHMAN UNIVERSAL INDEX by Ronald]
    CRITI DE OFT E LEHMAN UNIVERSAL INDEX By Ronald]. Ryan, CFA A recognized authority on fixed income strategies reminds us that the uses of this popular composite are limited. DISCLOSURE Corporate Bond Index was the initial benchnlark used by consultants and plall sponsors. I joined In the interest of full disclosure, I feel it proper Kuhn Loeb in 1977. At the end of that year, Kuhn to note that I was a former director of research for Loeb merged into Lehman, and the evolution of Lehman from 1977 to 1982. In that capacity, I bond indexes quickly developed. In 1979, as a designed the Government/Corporate Index plus project for CIGNA, I designed the Lehman numerous custom indexes. I am proud to have Goverllment/Corporate Index. I dedicated myself Lehman on nlY biography and will always be to a road show with consultants to inform them of grateful for the experience and knowledge this innovation and revelation. Shortly thereafter, afforded me there. the Lehman Government/Corporate Index became the generally accepted benchmark for bonds. GENESIS When Lehnlan introduced the Aggregate IIldex in 1986, it became the primary bond benchmark by The first bond index was designed ill the sunl­ the end of the decade. The new Lehman Universal mer of 1973 by Art Lipson, the director of research Index introduced in 1999 is now being promoted for Kuhn Loeb. Lipson actually created three dis­ as the replacement for the Aggregate Index. tinct indexes: 1. Kuhn Loeb Bond Index THE OBJECTIVE (All Corporates longer than 1 year) 2. Long-Term Corporates The objective of designing an index should be (All Corporates longer than 10 years) to provide accurate risk/reward measurements of a 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Efficiency
    ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΓΟΡΩΝ ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ......................………….............................................................................3 ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ 1: Η ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΙΚΩΝ ΑΓΟΡΩΝ 1.1 Τυχαίοι Περίπατοι (Random Walks) & Υπόθεση Αποτελεσματικών Αγορών.......6 1.2 Ο Ανταγωνισμός ως αιτία του Market Efficiency ..................................................8 1.3 Η κίνηση των τιμών σε μια αποτελεσματική αγορά................................................9 ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ 2: ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΙΚΩΝ ΑΓΟΡΩΝ 2.1 Προϋποθέσεις μιας αποτελεσματικής αγοράς.....................................................11 2.2 Μορφές των αποτελεσματικών αγορών..............................................................12 2.3 Επενδυτικές στρατηγικές και αποτελεσματικότητα αγορών..............................15 2.3.1 Η ενεργητική έναντι της παθητικής διαχείρισης χαρτοφυλακίου.......................15 2.3.2 Ο ρόλος της διαχείρισης χαρτοφυλακίου σε μια αποτελεσματική αγορά..........17 2.3.3 Η σχέση μεταξύ απόδοσης και κινδύνου............................................................19 ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ 3: ΕΛΕΓΧΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΓΟΡΩΝ 3.1 Εισαγωγή.............................................................................................................20 3.2 Έλεγχοι ασθενούς μορφής αποτελεσματικότητας (weak form tests)………….21 3.2.1 Έλεγχοι για ύπαρξη ικανότητας πρόβλεψης στις αποδόσεις των τιμών των μετοχών........................................................................................................................23 α) Αποδόσεις
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Institutions
    Chapter 8 Financial Institutions Companies Financing Nuclear Weapons Producers his chapter profiles each of the 322 financial institutions identified in this report as investing in nuclear weapons companies, either directly or through subsidiaries. It Tprovides information on their business activities, areas of operation, trading names, profits and revenue, customers and employees, and any major sponsorship deals. Australia Macquarie Group Macquarie Group Limited is a global investment banking and diversified financial services group, ANZ providing banking, financial, advisory, investment and ANZ is the third-largest bank in Australia and New funds management services to institutional, corporate Zealand. It has operations in 25 other nations. In and retail clients and counterparties around the world. 2010 it recorded a profit of A$4.51 billion. It has It is the largest investment bank in Australia. In 2009 approximately 47,000 employees. Its Australian it recorded a net income of A$1.05 billion. It has operations make up the largest part of its business, approximately 23,000 employees. with commercial and retail banking dominating. Invests in: Finmeccanica, Northrop Grumman Invests in: Babcock International, BAE Systems, Boeing, Headquarters: Sydney EADS, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Rolls‑Royce, Website: www.macquarie.com.au Thales Headquarters: Melbourne Website: www.anz.com Platinum Investment Management Platinum Investment Management is an Australian Commonwealth Bank of Australia fund manager specializing in investing in international The Commonwealth Bank of Australia is a equities. It manages in excess of A$15 billion with multinational bank with businesses across New around 11 per cent of this from investors in New Zealand, Fiji, Asia, the United States and the Zealand, Europe, the United States and Asia.
    [Show full text]