Through Shot and Flame

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Through Shot and Flame Through Shot And Flame By J. D. Kestell THROUGH SHOT AND FLAME PART I HOPE CHAPTER I I JOIN THE HARRISMITH COMMANDO I purpose to chronicle in the following pages my experiences of the war between the Boers and the English. It is my object to record what I went through on commando, and to give the reader an idea, according to my own observation, of the struggles and sufferings of a small nation against the overwhelming odds of an Empire—nay, against the world itself. For was it not against the world that the little nation fought? Think of it. Not only did England have 240,000 men in the field against 45,000 of the two South African Republics; not only did she have more guns than the two little States, much more ammunition, a much greater amount of supplies, a great many more horses, much more money—but she had the world also on her side. The world looked on the strife without putting forth a hand to help the weak against the strong: nay, it helped the strong. The United States of North America sold horses and wheat and meat to the mighty Empire, that was carrying on a war of extermination against the two small States in South Africa; the Republics of South America gave mules; Austria and Russia supplied horses. I do not forget, when I say this, the large sympathy which the world showed us. I should be guilty of the most heinous ingratitude if I did not acknowledge that the world, and especially Holland, went out of its way in liberally supplying clothing and large sums of money to our women and children in the concentration camps, and to the prisoners of war on the islands. But England had the advantage of a market almost wherever she wished to buy; and she closed up every avenue through which we might have been aided. And so the little nation stood alone, while its great adversary was assisted from the four corners of the earth. Now I purpose to put on record my experiences in this strife. I will do so as well as I can. What I have to relate, however, will by no means be a history of the war.—We shall not have a history of the war until our children write it.—No, I am not going to write a history: I am going to record my limited experiences. You will not find here, for instance, anything about the events which happened at Stormberg or Magersfontein, or about the taking of Bloemfontein or Pretoria. I was not present at those events. Only on that of which I was an eye-witness, or on what took place in the commando to which I belonged at the time, or what came to my notice shortly after its occurrence—only on that will I report in these pages. But let me tell you before I proceed, that I accompanied the burghers only as a minister of the Dutch Reformed Church. I was never armed. I never took part in a fight as a soldier. I never meddled with military matters. All that, I felt, lay outside of my province. And yet, as will appear in what follows, I fought in the great fight. I was often in action, and if I carried no arms, I carried a pouch of bandages. My presence in a fight gave heart to some and eased the pain of others. I fought, too, in another way: I encouraged the burghers in every service I held, just as every chaplain ought to do, and admonished them to persevere in the great fight. But I never forgot that I was a minister of religion. Every Sunday, and whenever I had an opportunity in the week, I conducted divine service, taking, as a rule, my text from the Old Testament. Besides this I devoted myself to ambulance work, without, however, ever wearing a Red Cross on my sleeve. I need not say that I was heart and soul one with the great cause of the Republics. Nothing lay nearer to my heart than their welfare; and when it appeared that war was imminent, and that it would be disastrous to my people, it weighed upon my mind like lead. War?—Ay, war! I feared a collision with England from the moment that Sir Alfred Milner proved at the Bloemfontein Conference that nothing could satisfy him. I became convinced then of what I had all along suspected, but would not believe, that the object of England was not to see that the Uitlander should obtain his rights, but that the two Republics should be annihilated, and that the map of South Africa should, as Rhodes had put it, be painted red. These suspicions of mine soon proved not to have been unfounded. President Kruger had consented, at last, to grant the franchise to Uitlanders, after a residence of five years in the country; and everybody thought now that war was averted, and that there would be a peaceful adjustment of the differences between England and the South African Republic. But England did not want that. England wanted the Transvaal. Contrary to the expectations of everyone, the British Government did not accept the proposal of President Kruger, and said that it would dictate its own terms. It was speedily seen that England intended to do this by force of arms, for numbers of British troops had begun to mass on the boundaries of the two Republics. At last England got what it had been seeking—a palpable causa belli, in the Ultimatum which the Transvaal Government, wearied to death, at last issued. Both Boers and Britishers have declared that it was a fatal mistake on the part of the Transvaal to issue the Ultimatum. The Boers said that President Kruger should have waited until England had begun hostilities; and the English protested that there would have been no war, if there had been no Ultimatum. Lord Salisbury, especially, has never wearied in his attempt to make the world believe that England went to war with the Republics solely because of the insult offered by the Ultimatum; and that the two States themselves had by that act made it impossible for the British Government to permit them to retain their independence. But the world knows better. The world knows that it was England, not the Republics, that began the quarrel, when, contrary to the terms of the Convention of 1884, she interfered with the internal affairs of the South African Republic; when later on she would listen to no proposal of the Transvaal Government, and when she began sending troops to the boundaries of the two States. The world can comprehend also that the Republics could not wait until England had completed the massing of her troops on the borders, to wake up one morning and find themselves invaded from every side. The world, too, knows what must be said of the blow which falls in a manner mechanically, after unendurable provocation. And posterity, sitting in judgment, will pass its verdict on the Ultimatum. It will say that it was a protest against wrong and oppression. It will hear a little people speaking through that Ultimatum to a great nation: "Thou art great and mighty, and thou wouldst set thy foot upon my neck; but I declare here before the whole world that Might is not Right; and I defy thee!" I cannot enter into a discussion here of the question whether the South African Republic wronged the Uitlanders. But if this had been the case, was England then the knight-errant among the nations of the earth, to rush to the succour of such as might be oppressed by the one or the other Power?—And if she considered that this was her mission, why did she never attempt to teach Turkey, Russia, even the United States of America, what their duty was? Nothing was further removed from the thoughts of England than such disinterestedness. But she imagined that she had a chance with this little people; and when she wished to beat the dog, she found a stick in the grievances of the Uitlanders. Poor Transvaal, thou wert not perfect—far from that! But thou hadst had no time to become so. Thou hadst had no time to develop into what thou wouldst have become in the course of years. Thy great neighbour, arrived at maturity through centuries of imperfections, found thee a child, and, counting it a crime in thee to be a child, made a murderous assault on thee! The negotiations between England and the South African Republic were still progressing when England sent troops, not only to the Transvaal, but also the Free State borders. What else but undisguised hostility could the Governments of the two Republics see in this action of England? They were compelled by it to prepare themselves for any emergency; and enjoined, in consequence, the landdrosts to instruct the commandants of all the districts of the two States to commandeer the burghers. This commandeering took place on 2nd of October 1899. It was on Sunday, and many a Boer had gathered his household around him, and was sitting with his Bible open before him, while he was conducting his Sunday family worship, when the field-cornet, or other person sent in his stead, came and told him that he had to appear at a certain place, with his horse, saddle and bridle, rifle and thirty rounds of ammunition, and rations for eight days. The Harrismith Commando was ordered to muster on the farm—The Oaks; and most of the burghers composing it arrived there next day.
Recommended publications
  • The Role and Application of the Union Defence Force in the Suppression of Internal Unrest, 1912 - 1945
    THE ROLE AND APPLICATION OF THE UNION DEFENCE FORCE IN THE SUPPRESSION OF INTERNAL UNREST, 1912 - 1945 Andries Marius Fokkens Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Military Science (Military History) at the Military Academy, Saldanha, Faculty of Military Science, Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Lieutenant Colonel (Prof.) G.E. Visser Co-supervisor: Dr. W.P. Visser Date of Submission: September 2006 ii Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously submitted it, in its entirety or in part, to any university for a degree. Signature:…………………….. Date:………………………….. iii ABSTRACT The use of military force to suppress internal unrest has been an integral part of South African history. The European colonisation of South Africa from 1652 was facilitated by the use of force. Boer commandos and British military regiments and volunteer units enforced the peace in outlying areas and fought against the indigenous population as did other colonial powers such as France in North Africa and Germany in German South West Africa, to name but a few. The period 1912 to 1945 is no exception, but with the difference that military force was used to suppress uprisings of white citizens as well. White industrial workers experienced this military suppression in 1907, 1913, 1914 and 1922 when they went on strike. Job insecurity and wages were the main causes of the strikes and militant actions from the strikers forced the government to use military force when the police failed to maintain law and order.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court of South Africa Time to Nurture Junior Or Less Experienced Colleagues Along the Way
    I THE JUDICIARY September 2020 | Q2 ISSUE > DIGITAL ELECTORAL JUSTICE AND COVID-19 > JUSTICE IN THE DIGITAL AGE > SOCIAL MEDIA AND JUDICIAL TRAINING > ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE > WOMANITY - WOMEN IN UNITY > OUR COURTS, OUR HERITAGE Judiciary Newsletter | 2020 II Judiciary Newsletter | 2020 III NATIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: 188 14th ROAD, NOORDWYK MIDRAND, 1685 SWITCHBOARD NUMBER 010 493 2500 Judiciary Newsletter | 2020 IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 Challenges faced by women in the legal profession 06 Digital electoral justice and Covid-19 08 Justice in the digital age 13 Social media and judicial training 14 Artificial intelligence 16 Practical guide to virtual hearings in motion court 20 Womanity - Women in Unity 26 Special Tribunal hits the ground running 27 Magistrates courts get capacity boost 28 A tribute to Judge Jaji 29 Our courts, our heritage 35 Judicial Appointments EDITORIAL STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS Editor: Judge President Dunstan Mlambo Writers: Judge Leona Theron | Judge President Selby Mbenenge | Judge President Cagney Musi | Judge Boissie Mbha Judge Brian Spilg | Judge Glenn Goosen | Judge Anna Maleshane Kgoele | Judge Mokgere Masipa | Judge Tebogo Djaje Judge Thoba Poyo-Dlwati | Judge Segopotje Sheila Mphahlele | Mr Selby Makgotho | Ms Lusanda Ntuli | Ms Pfunzo Mafenya Photographers: Ms Lusanda Ntuli | Ms Pfunzo Mafenya | Ms Nontembiso Kgatle Designer: Ms Nontembiso Kgatle TheSouthAfricanJudiciary NATIONAL OFFICE: 188, 14th Road, Noordwyk, Midrand, 1685 @OCJ_RSA Judiciary RSA T: +27 10 493 2500 E: [email protected] @OCJ_RSA W: www.judiciary.org.za Judiciary Newsletter | 2020 Page | 1 Editor We commemorated two important occasions in the past quarter, Women’s Month in August and Heritage Month in September. Whilst we marked these occasions together but apart this year because of the coronavirus pandemic, they were no less important.
    [Show full text]
  • The Composition, Authority and Jurisdiction of the Court
    he Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa is the successor to the Appellate Division, first established in 1910 when the Union of South Africa was established. The name of the court was changed by the Constitution of 1996. TIn terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court of Appeal • functions only as a court of appeal • may decide any matter on appeal and, • is, except for constitutional matters, the highest court of appeal. The Supreme Court of Appeal has constitutional jurisdiction but the Constitutional Court • is the highest court in all constitutional matters, and • may decide only constitutional matters and connected issues. The Supreme Court of Appeal may make an order concerning the constitutional validity of an Act of Parliament, a provincial Act or any conduct of the President, but an order of constitutional invalidity has no force unless it is confirmed by the Constitutional Court. THE COMPOSITION, AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION OF THE COURT The court is composed of the President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Appeal and a number of judges of appeal determined by an Act of Parliament. At present there are 24 positions. Decisions of the court are binding on all lower courts. Whereas previously the head of the Appellate Division was the Chief Justice, this is no longer the case. The Chief Justice of South Africa is now the head of the Constitutional Court. The head of the Supreme Court of Appeal is the President. 1 The seat of the Supreme Court of Appeal is at Bloemfontein. Provision exists for a session of the court at another place when by reason of exceptional circumstances it is expedient to hold its sitting there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appellate Division: 1910 to 1948
    SA judiciary years old The Appellate Division: 1910 to 1948 By Ian Farlam, former judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal rom the time it was established in 1910 until 1950, when the Privy Council Appeals Act 16 of 1950 Fcame into force, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa was an intermedi- ate court of appeal from decisions of the various South African courts. This was because the supreme court of appeal for South Africa during that period was the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, sitting in London. Before the Appellate Division was established, appeals went straight to the Privy Council from decisions of the supreme courts of the Cape, the Transvaal and Natal, while decisions of the superior courts in the Eastern Cape and Griqualand West had first to be taken on appeal to the Cape Supreme Court and those from the Orange River Colony (as the Free State was then called) had first to go to the Transvaal Supreme Court before further appeals were possible to the Privy Council. The need for an intermediate court of appeal to hear appeals from The first Chief Justice was Sir Henry de Villiers, who was made a the various South African courts was felt as early as 1905 when a baron and accordingly became Lord De Villiers and who had been conference of attorneys-general held at Bloemfontein proposed that the chief justice of the Cape since 1873. The ordinary judges of a South African court be set up. In their report on this proposal the appeal were Rose Innes and Solomon and the additional judges of Transvaal judges suggested that action on the proposal be postponed appeal were the newly appointed Judges President of the Cape and for the moment, but they expressed their views on what the compo- Transvaal Provincial Divisions, Christian George Maasdorp and Jacob sition and attributes of the court should be when it was ultimately Abraham Jeremy (Jaap) de Villiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock: a History of Collecting Collections at the University of Pretoria (1908-2014)
    Taking stock: A history of collecting collections at the University of Pretoria (1908-2014) by GERARD DE KAMPER A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER HEREDITATIS CULTURAEQUE SCIENTIAE (HISTORY) in the Department of Historical and Heritage Studies in the Faculty of Humanities UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA SUPERVISOR: Prof K. L. Harris 2018 1 CONTENT Page Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations v Introduction 1 Chapter One: Background 3 Chapter Two: Writing on collecting collections 10 Chapter Three: Large mixed collections 41 Chapter Four: Object collections 85 Chapter Five: Art collections 119 Chapter Six: Book and document collections 155 Conclusion 190 Bibliography 195 ii Abstract Until relatively recently the histories of collections across the world was a subject sadly neglected. Generally most research on museums was specifically collections- based, meaning research that focused on the actual or individual objects with no real effort being made to preserve or research the actual collecting or acquiring history in detail. The question then arises, what is the importance of preserving collection history? Besides the pragmatic necessity to keep record of the details of the acquisition from a legal perspective, the actual provenance and historical context is also of relevance. On the one hand it is telling of what a particular society or institution deemed worthy of preservation within a particular time and therefore reflects on that past – while on the other hand, it also speaks to the nature and context of the collections themselves. It is from this perspective that this proposed study considers the range of collections that the University of Pretoria gathered over a period of just over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • A Faure Genealogy: Book 1 (Of 8): History and 3 Generations After Antoine Faure (1685-1736)
    A FAURE GENEALOGY: BOOK 1 (OF 8): HISTORY AND 3 GENERATIONS AFTER ANTOINE FAURE (1685-1736) by Alexander Pierre FAURE (1946-) Michael John HARRIS (1933-) Albert Pieter Verner FAURE (1931-2007) CONTENTS Chapter Introduction Chapter Sources Chapter Ancestors of Antoine FAURE (1685-1736) Chapter Antoine FAURE (1685-1736) and Rachel DE VILLIERS (1694-1773) Chapter The DE VILLIERS family and Rachel DE VILLIERS (1694-1773) Chapter Children of Antoine FAURE (1685-1736) and Rachel DE VILLIERS (1694-1773) Chapter Children of Abraham FAURE (1717-1792) Chapter Petronella Sophia FAURE (1787-1868) Chapter Children of Jan Pieter FAURE (1760-1820) Chapter Children of Abraham FAURE (1795-1868) Chapter Children of David Pieter FAURE (1842-1916) Chapter Descendants of Vincent FAURE (1877-1918) Chapter Descendants of Reginald Theodore FAURE (1882-1952) Chapter Descendants of Jan Pieter Hendrik FAURE (1804-1856) Chapter Elisabeth Hendrica FAURE (1791-1863) Chapter Descendants of Abraham FAURE (1767-1846) Chapter Children of Jacobus Christiaan FAURE (1769-1834) Chapter Children of Abraham FAURE (1795-1875) Chapter Children of Jacobus Christiaan FAURE (1819-1879) Chapter Children of Abraham FAURE (1847-1927) Chapter Descendants of Andrew Murray FAURE (1893-1960) Chapter Children of Johan Christiaan FAURE (1849-1905) Chapter Descendants of Carel Frederik FAURE (1892-?) Chapter Descendants of Charles Kirkwood FAURE (1926-?) Chapter Descendants of William Caldwell FAURE (1893-1969) Chapter Descendants of Jacobus Christiaan FAURE (1856-1898) Chapter Children of
    [Show full text]
  • JACOB DE VILLIERS ROOS (JVROOS) [1869-1940] HISTORICAL MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION Special Collections Department of Library Services University of Pretoria
    Archival listing and inventory of the: JACOB DE VILLIERS ROOS (JVROOS) [1869-1940] HISTORICAL MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION Special Collections Department of Library Services University of Pretoria Compiled by Michelle de la Harpe April 2018 - October 2018 Kindly funded by the University of Pretoria Heritage Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS OF JVROOS COLLECTION Box One ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Personal correspondence 1896-1935 Contents: Written correspondence between JACOB DE VILLIERS ROOS (1869-1940) and JAN CHRISTIAAN SMUTS (1870-1950) from 1896 to 1935, as well as ISSIE KRIGE SMUTS (1870 – 1954). Consists of 19 handwritten letters (South African Dutch) and 2 telegrams. Box Two ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Personal and professional correspondence 1902-1919 Contents: Hardcover book with personal and professional correspondence Contents: Written correspondence between JACOB DE VILLIERS ROOS and various individuals. Consists of handwritten letters, handwritten notes, envelopes and typed manuscripts. Box Three ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Correspondence 1915 Contents: Written correspondence between JACOB DE VILLIERS ROOS and the solicitors STEGMANN AND ROOS, as well
    [Show full text]
  • Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and the Boer Rebellion
    Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and the Boer Rebellion Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and the Boer Rebellion This etext was prepared by Alan R. Light ([email protected], formerly [email protected], etc.). To assure a high quality text, the original was typed in (manually) twice and electronically compared. Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and the Boer Rebellion By Solomon Tshekisho Plaatje [South African (ethnic Tswana) Editor, Author, Statesman. 1876?-1932.] First Secretary-General of the South African Native National Congress (forerunner of the ANC), 1912-1917. Author of "Mhudi", generally considered the first novel written by a black South African. [The two portraits are not available for this ASCII text. They are titled "The Author." and "Mrs. S. T. Plaatje. Without whose loyal co-operation this book would never have been written."] page 1 / 543 [Note on text: Italicized words or phrases are CAPITALIZED. Some obvious errors have been corrected (see Notes).] Native Life in South Africa, Before and Since the European War and the Boer Rebellion By Sol. T. Plaatje Editor of `Tsala ea Batho', Kimberley, S.A. Author of `Sechuana Proverbs and their European Equivalents' Fourth Edition Foreword (Native Life in South Africa electronic text): Sol Plaatje began work on `Native Life in South Africa' in 1914, while on his way to Britain to plead with the Imperial Government against the Natives' Land Act of 1913, as part of a deputation of the South African Native National Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project Gutenberg Ebook of Three Years' War, by Christiaan Rudolf
    C. R. de Wet Copyright 1902 by Charles Scribner's Sons. N.Y. THREE YEARS' WAR BY CHRISTIAAN RUDOLF DE WET FRONTISPIECE BY JOHN S. SARGENT, R.A. FOUR PLANS AND A MAP Downloaded from www.gendatabase.com NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1902 Copyright, 1902, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS All rights reserved Published, December, 1902 TROW DIRECTORY PRINTING AND BOOKBINDING COMPANY NEW YORK TO MY FELLOW SUBJECTS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE [Pg vii] Preface By way of introduction to my work I wish, dear reader, to say only this short word: "I am no book-writer."—But I felt that the story of this struggle, in which a small people fought for liberty and right, is rightly said, throughout the civilized world, to be unknown, and that it was my duty to record my personal experiences in this war, for the present and for the future generations, not only for the Afrikander people, but for the whole world. Not only did I consider this my duty, but I was encouraged to write by the urgings of prominent men among my people, of men of various nationalities and even of several British officers. Well, dear reader, I hope that you will not feel disappointed in reading these experiences, as it is not in me, as is perhaps sometimes the case with historical authors, to conjure up thrilling pictures—imaginary things—and put them together merely to make up a book or to make a name for themselves. That be far from me! In publishing my book (although it is written in simple style) I had one object only, viz., to give to the world a story which, although it does not contain [Pg viii] the whole of the truth, as regards this wondrous war, yet contains nothing but the truth.
    [Show full text]