The Sociopolitical Construction of Race and Literary Representations of the Biracial Subject
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 The Sociopolitical Construction Of Race And Literary Representations Of The Biracial Subject Kara Fontenot University of Central Florida Part of the African American Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Fontenot, Kara, "The Sociopolitical Construction Of Race And Literary Representations Of The Biracial Subject" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 1503. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/1503 THE SOCIOPOLITICAL CONSTRUCTION OF RACE AND LITERARY REPRESENTATIONS OF THE BIRACIAL SUBJECT by KARA JANEAN FONTENOT B.S. United States Air Force Academy, 1996 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of English in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2006 © 2006 Kara Janean Fontenot ii ABSTRACT Twentieth-century American literature incorporates interracial and biracial themes that bring to light the often unnamed and unrecognized biracial identities of many Americans. Unfortunately, despite the potential value for a deeper understanding of the construction of race, these themes have seldom been seriously considered in the context of reevaluating the nature of the system that creates racial labels and categories until the recent emergence of postmodern critical theories. This thesis examines the black-white interracial themes and biracial protagonists in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928) and Danzy Senna’s Caucasia (1998) in order to explore the texts’ representations of systems of hegemonic power that create racial labels and categories. I discuss the binary sociopolitical construction of race in the United States (black- white) and the complexity of biracial identities as a foundation for my examination of literary representations of biracial subjectivity, racial passing, primitive exoticism, and the intersections between race, class and gender. I conclude that a study of the interracial theme in literature is a dive into the chasm between margin and center, the enunciative split between the binary racial signifiers black and white. Therefore, representations of biracial subjectivity provide a unique vantage point for surveillance of the complexities of the human struggle to gain and maintain power. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 1 List of References ....................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO: THE COLOR LINE.......................................................................................... 7 List of References ..................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER THREE: THE (DIS)INTEGRATING BIRACIAL SUBJECT IN QUICKSAND..... 42 List of References ..................................................................................................................... 71 CHAPTER FOUR: IDENTITY, RACE AND THE BIRACIAL SUBJECT IN CAUCASIA...... 74 List of References ................................................................................................................... 108 CHAPTER FIVE: THE COMMITMENT TO THEORIZING THE BIRACIAL SUBJECT.... 111 List of References ................................................................................................................... 120 iv CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Twentieth-century American literature incorporates interracial and biracial themes that bring to light the often unnamed and unrecognized biracial identities of many Americans.1 Unfortunately, despite the potential value for a deeper understanding of the sociopolitical construction of race, these themes have seldom been seriously considered in the context of reevaluating the nature of the system that created racial labels and categories until the recent emergence of postmodern critical theories. As Werner Sollors suggests: “The time may have come to stop avoiding the interracial theme in literature, to investigate it, and to unpack its semantic fields” (4). This thesis proposes to examine the black-white interracial themes and biracial protagonists in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand (1928) and Danzy Senna’s Caucasia (1998) in order to understand the operations of the systems of hegemonic power that create racial labels and categories. In my reading of these two texts, I will examine the binary sociopolitical construction of race in the United States (black-white), the complexity of biracial identities, the theme of racial passing, the theme of the primitive exotic, and the intersections between race, class and gender. In order to examine representations of race and explore interracial and biracial themes in American literature, my thesis will draw on New Historicism, ethnic literary and cultural studies, postcolonial studies and Critical Race Theory. Chapter One will rely on a collection of racial discourses that represent a history of the “color line” which divides black and white Americans 1 While this thesis only examines portrayals of black-white biraciality in two specific twentieth-century novels, Quicksand and Caucasia, biracial and multiracial themes involving many other racial groups are also well- represented in twentieth-century American literature. 1 and will contextualize the vocabulary that I use to discuss race in this thesis. Chapters Two and Three will discuss Quicksand and Caucasia, respectively, by placing each text within the context of the literary and cultural histories relevant to the texts’ representations of race. Chapter Four will summarize the major conclusions of my thesis. However, before embarking on this project, a critical question must be answered: what is race? While notions of race refer to human bodies with certain physical traits (called phenotypic characteristics by racial anthropologists), most modern scientists agree that no biological basis for distinguishing “races” (or species) of humans exists. However, the institutionalization of American racism was supported by racial pseudo-science that had roots in the work of racist philosophies initially developed in Europe. During the eighteenth and nineteenth century, as European nations expanded into other continents and developed colonial empires, European scholars and philosophers began to develop theories of racial inferiority. Philosophers that published theories of racial inferiority include David Hume, Immanuel Kant and Georg Hegel, yet perhaps the most well-known European racist is French scholar Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, who published The Inequality of the Human Races (1853) and later became one of Adolf Hitler’s favorite authors (D’Souza 28, 63). By the mid-twentieth century, anthropologists, such as Ernest Hooton and Carleton Coon, were developing pseudo-scientific theories and systems of racial classification that were based primarily on hair texture, nose shape and head shape (Davis 19). These scientists assigned the racial identity “black” to people with “Negroid” phenotypic characteristics: rounder heads, frizzier hair, broader noses and darker skin (Davis 19). Similarly, the scientists assigned the racial identity “white” to people with “Caucasoid” phenotypic characteristics: longer heads, straighter hair, narrower noses and lighter skin (Davis 19). 2 Currently, The Oxford English Dictionary (2006) defines ‘race’ as “one of the great divisions of mankind, having certain physical peculiarities in common.” However, the dictionary’s entry also notes, “The term is often used imprecisely; even among anthropologists there is no generally accepted classification or terminology.” As noted by geneticists Lynne Jorde and Stephen Wooding, recent genetic studies examine the frequency of traits in different human populations and argue against the existence of pure races. These scientists note that genes that dictate different physical traits vary independently and are not carried in genetic clusters; therefore, a person may have blue eyes (traditionally associated with the Caucasian race) and extremely curly hair (traditionally associated with the Negroid race), making it difficult or impossible to assign that person to a racial category based on his or her phenotypic characteristics. According to Jorde and Wooding, biomedical studies have concluded that, due to “the continual mixing and migration of human populations throughout history,” the genetic makeup of two individuals who are socially assigned to different ‘races’ may be more similar than the genetic makeup of two individuals socially assigned to the same ‘race’. As F. James Davis notes, “At best, such anatomical groupings as Kroeber’s three races are only rough, statistical categories representing average differences of combinations of traits” (20). The impossibility of establishing concrete categories of human race is illustrated upon examination of biracial and multiracial people whose physical characteristics often confound people who wish to assign racial labels. Despite the absence of a scientific