In Defense of the Classics, Against New Racism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Defense of the Classics, Against New Racism 2021-4348-AJSS-SOC – 01 JUL 2021 1 In defense of the Classics, against New Racism 2 3 4 The Tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) 5 6 In our country ―People of color lead shorter lives, receive worse medical 7 care, complete fewer years of school, and occupy more menial jobs than do 8 whites,‖1 but lamentable not only that. There is a racial gap in many aspects of 9 life - rates of infant and maternal mortality, longevity, level of schooling and 10 educational achievements, menial and professional job, unemployment, 11 abortion, marriages, divorce, single motherhood, median family income, 12 people living below the poverty line, health, alcoholism, drug dependency, 13 HIV/AIDS, and healthcare. In all these cases, Blacks perform worse than 14 Whites. The gap persists despite the society-wide historical improvement 15 brought on by the Civil Rights movement and along with Affirmative Action. 16 Blacks‘ life improvement occurs in the background and context of Whites‘ life 17 improvement. So, life of Blacks, despite meaningful improvement, might be 18 seen and felt as getting worse. Paradoxically, CRT comes as a reaction to this 19 relative deprivation. 20 ―Critical Race Theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, 21 including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and 22 neutral principles of constitutional law.‖2 23 According to CRT, ―racism is the usual way society does business, the 24 common, everyday experience of most people of color in this country, the 25 norm. The system of ―white-over-color ascendancy‖ serves important 26 purposes, both psychic and material, for the dominant group. Racism is 27 difficult to address or cure because it is not acknowledged.‖ The color-blind or 28 ―formal‖ conception of equality covers and can remedy only the most blatant 29 forms of discrimination, which stand out and attract our attention. ―3 30 Although in all indicators of a good life ‗Whites‘ stand behind ‗Asians,‘ 31 CRT considers the binary Black-white relationship as the paradigm central to 32 racial analysis,4 the window onto ignored or alternative realities.5 ―To see the 1Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Angela Harris, 2017. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction, Third Edition, New York: New York University Press, p.13. 2Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Angela Harris, 2017. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction, Third Edition, New York: New York University Press, pp.3, 13. 3Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Harris Angela. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction. Third Edition. 2017. New York: New York University Press, p. 8. 4Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Harris Angela. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction. Third Edition. 2017. New York: New York University Press, p 169. 5Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Harris Angela. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction. Third Edition. 2017. New York: New York University Press, p. 46. "Alternative facts" was a phrase used by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway during a Meet the Press interview on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer's false statement about the attendance numbers of Donald Trump's inauguration as President of the United States. When pressed during the interview with Chuck Todd to explain why Spicer would "utter a provable falsehood," Conway stated that Spicer was giving 1 2021-4348-AJSS-SOC – 01 JUL 2021 1 world as binary and to choose the side of righteousness makes life much more 2 meaningful, - Andrew Sullivan commented. - It banishes doubt and 3 complexity. It makes us feel better to be part of a tribe and to have a simple 4 enemy or ally who is clearly visible — just check the color of their skin, as 5 every elite student is now trained to do. ―6 6 The wisdom of street smart guys might help us here. 7 8 What are you looking for? The keys. 9 Did you lose them here? No. 10 Why are you looking for them here? It‘s light here. 11 12 In that vein, why not denigrate Western Civilization? 13 14 Polychromy in Antiquity - Gods in Color - liebieghaus.de 15 16 ―So what does it say to viewers today when museums display gleaming 17 white statues? What does it say when the only people of color one is likely to 18 see appear on a ceramic vessel? Sara Bond wrote. Intentional or not, museums 19 present viewers with a false color binary (CRT tries to impose) of the ancient 20 world?‖ - Sarah Bond asks. With rescoring their true polychrome, ―we can 21 come to better understand ourselves.‖7 22 To the credit of Richard Delgado, and Jean Stefancic, they recognize that 23 CRT may become ―the New Civil Rights orthodoxy‖ and embed itself ―in 24 academic scholarship and teaching and that its precepts became commonplace, 25 part of conventional wisdom.‖8 The CRT is analyzed but rejected as ―overly 26 radical, inconsistent with Enlightenment philosophy, and a bad example to 27 minority communities.‖9 The proponents of CRT commit to working toward 28 social justice and reject liberalism with its support of colorblindness, equal 29 opportunity, and meritocracy. 30 In modern societies, meritocracy means the power of people distinguished 31 by their talents and skills regardless of class, race, gender, or ethnicity. This is 32 a historically progressive social arrangement because, more than any other 33 social arrangement, it opens to people at the bottom of society a path to social 34 success based on their abilities and efforts. According to its vision of the 35 society as a system that works against people of color to benefit white people, 36 Critical Race Theory, broadly recognized in American colleges and "alternative facts." Todd responded, "Look, alternative facts are not facts. They're falsehoods." (Taken from the Internet) 6 Sullivan, Andrew. 2021. ―The unbearable Whiteness of the Classics.‖ The Willey Dish. 02.06.21. 7 Bond, Sarah, 2017. ―Whitewashing Ancient Statues: Whiteness, Racism and Color in the Ancient World,‖ Forbes. 8 Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Harris Angela. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction. Third Edition. 2017. New York: New York University Press, p. 158. 9 Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, Foreword by Harris Angela. Critical Race Theory. An Introduction. Third Edition. 2017. New York: New York University Press, p. 159. 2 2021-4348-AJSS-SOC – 01 JUL 2021 1 universities, overshadows and even substitutes any merit, blamed as 2 ―mechanical scales,‖10 with the right color – the further from white, the better. 3 ―The classical past has never been co-opted by only one political tendency: 4 Classics have probably legitimated as many revolutions as they legitimated 5 conservative dictatorships,‖ - as Mary Beard, a professor of Classics at 6 Cambridge, writes. - ―Classics are, of course, about us as much as about 7 Greeks and Romans.‖11 8 From one side of the academic spectrum, ―Our discipline was built to 9 exclude,‖ Rebecca Futo Kennedy wrote. ―It continues to be used to craft and 10 promote exclusions. I look around this room today and I see a sea of whiteness, 11 just like we see at every conference and still too often in our classrooms.‖ We 12 have to truly ―embrace a ‗classics for all‘ mentality and way of acting, and 13 understanding that ‗classics‘ don‘t have to be an ex uno unum--it is and should 14 be an e pluribus unum.”12 15 From another side of the academic spectrum, Roger Kimball wrote, 16 ―There has never in history been a society more open to other cultures than 17 our own; nor has any tradition been more committed to self-criticism than 18 the Western tradition: the figure of Socrates endlessly inviting self-scrutiny 19 and rational explanation is a definitive image of the Western spirit. 20 Moreover, ‗Western‘ science is not exclusively Western: it is science plain 21 and simple—yes, it is ‗universal‘ science — which, though invented and 22 developed in the West, is as true for the inhabitants of the Nile Valley as it 23 is for the denizens of New York.‖13 24 The wave of the struggle against ‗white privilege‘ and ‗systemic racism‘ 25 has not excluded the field of classics, the study of Ancient Greece and Rome. 26 ―Although the faculty members and departments are obligated to operate as 27 market actors procuring resources in a hypercompetitive environment,‖14 and 28 students are mostly imbued with utilitarian goals, either their own or those 29 transferred from their parents who are paying tuition bills,15 the wind of 30 cultural wars 16 did not disappear from the sails of the Black Athena 31 controversy, presented and symbolized by this collocation. ―When you hear 32 someone – be the student, a colleague, or an amateur -- say that they are 33 interested in classics because of ‗the Greek miracle‘ or because Classics is ‗the 34 foundation of western civilization and ‗culture,‘ Donna Zuckerberg, the Editor- 10 Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, 2017. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, New York: New York University Press, pp.104, 179. 11 Beard, Mary. Confronting the Classics. Traditions, Adventures, and Innovations, New York London: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2013, p. 7. 12 Futo Kennedy, Rebecca. 2017. ―Why I Teach About Race and Ethnicity in the Classical World.‖ Eidolon, Sep. 2017. 13 Kimball, Roger. 2021, New Criterion, ―Tenured Radicals‖: a postscript, Vol.19, No.10, p.8. 14 Shullenberger, Geoff. 2021. ―Social Justice, Austerity, and the Humanities Death Spiral.‖ The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 8, 2021. 15 Beye, Charles.1998. Who Killed Homer? The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, Free Press: 98.5.12.
Recommended publications
  • Bradley Impact Fund
    FROM THE DESK OF GABE CONGER BY THE NUMBERS Dear Friends, This month, nearly 1.9 million students will graduate with a bachelor’s degree. What will they take away from their college experience? Many will earn a STEM degree or gain experience through internships. Leadership and technology skills will be enhanced. Yet, too few will have greater respect for vigorous public dialogue and diversity of viewpoints. The pressure to conform to the political correctness so pervasive on America’s college campuses is a barrier to young Americans learning and valuing the principles of free speech and freedom of thought. These principles CLASS1.9M OF 2019 were essential to the founding of our nation, and they are just as essential today. BACHELOR'S DEGREES With such extensive uniformity of opinion, the "informed citizenry" of today is not what our founding fathers pictured. Our theme for this issue is the intersection of the power of ideas, education, and informed citizens. Robert P. George, Princeton University professor and Bradley Foundation Board Member, shares his perspective as a conservative academic 10:1 engaged with young Americans at the threshold of their independence. We’re DEMOCRAT also pleased to announce the 2019 Bradley Prizes winners, whose work has PROFESSORS steadfastly advanced an informed citizenry. The Grant Recipient Spotlight will OUTNUMBER help you create your summer reading list; and in The Future is Now, we share REPUBLICAN Lincoln Network co-founder Aaron Ginn’s ideas for collaboration of like-minded technologists using their Silicon Valley skills to advance liberty and viewpoint diversity. Free thought and free speech are under fire in our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and Its Multifarious Enemies
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Maxime Dafaure, « The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/369 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies 1 The “Great Meme War:” the Alt- Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Memes and the metapolitics of the alt-right 1 The alt-right has been a major actor of the online culture wars of the past few years. Since it came to prominence during the 2014 Gamergate controversy,1 this loosely- defined, puzzling movement has achieved mainstream recognition and has been the subject of discussion by journalists and scholars alike. Although the movement is notoriously difficult to define, a few overarching themes can be delineated: unequivocal rejections of immigration and multiculturalism among most, if not all, alt- right subgroups; an intense criticism of feminism, in particular within the manosphere community, which itself is divided into several clans with different goals and subcultures (men’s rights activists, Men Going Their Own Way, pick-up artists, incels).2 Demographically speaking, an overwhelming majority of alt-righters are white heterosexual males, one of the major social categories who feel dispossessed and resentful, as pointed out as early as in the mid-20th century by Daniel Bell, and more recently by Michael Kimmel (Angry White Men 2013) and Dick Howard (Les Ombres de l’Amérique 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Bias in the Legal Academy: Overstated and Undervalued Michael Vitiello Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2007 Liberal Bias in the Legal Academy: Overstated and Undervalued Michael Vitiello Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Michael Vitiello, Liberal Bias in the Legal Academy: Overstated and Undervalued, 77 Miss. L.J. 507 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBERAL BIAS IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY: OVERSTATED AND UNDERVALUED Michael Vitiello * I. INTRODUCTION By many accounts, universities are hotbeds of left-wing radicalism. 1 Often fueled by overreaching administrators, right- wing bloggers and radio talk show hosts rail against the sup- pression of free speech by the "politically correct" left wing. 2 Over the past twenty years, numerous and mostly conservative commentators have published books decrying radical professors and their efforts to force their own political vision on their stu- dents. 3 Most recently , former Communist turned hard-right • Distinguished Pr ofesso r and Scholar, Pacific McGeorge School of Law; B.A. Swarthmore, 1969; J.D . University of Penn sylvania, 1974. I want to extend special thanks to a wonderful group of research assistants who ran down obscure footnotes and converted oddball citation s into Bluebook form-thanks to Cameron Desmond, Oona Mallett, Alison Terry, Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger-Scruton-Beauty
    Beauty This page intentionally left blank Beauty ROGER SCRUTON 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # Horsell’s Farm Enterprises Limited The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Italy and acid-free paper by Lego S.p.A ISBN 978–0–19–955952–7 13579108642 CONTENTS Picture Acknowledgements vii Preface ix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Misogyny, the Classics, and the Political Right: for an Ethical Scholarship of Ancient History
    ISSN 2421-0730 NUMERO 1 – GIUGNO 2019 FRANCESCO ROTIROTI On Misogyny, the Classics, and the Political Right: For an Ethical Scholarship of Ancient History D. ZUCKERBERG, Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London 2018, pp. 270 n. 1/2019 FRANCESCO ROTIROTI* On Misogyny, the Classics, and the Political Right: For an Ethical Scholarship of Ancient History D. ZUCKERBERG, Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London 2018, pp. 270 I. Not All Dead White Men is the first book by Donna Zuckerberg, an American classicist educated at Princeton University, best known as the founder and chief editor of Eidolon, an online journal Whose declared mission is to “mak[e] the classics political and personal, feminist and fun.”1 Some of the most attractive and remarkable of Eidolon’s articles are precisely those Which adopt a progressive, inclusive, and feminist perspective on the place of ancient history and the classics in present-day politics. The book under revieW has a similar inspiration, concerned as it is with the appropriation of the classics by What is often described as the “manosphere,” a loose netWork of online communities connected by their aWareness of the purported misandry of present-day societies and fostering * Postdoctoral Researcher in Legal History at “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro. 1 Eidolon’s Mission Statement, in Eidolon, Aug. 21, 2017, https://eidolon.pub/eidolons- mission-statement-d026012023d5. On the political element, see esp. D. ZUCKERBERG, Welcome to the New Eidolon! in Eidolon, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Example of Pericles
    Hoover Press : Brave DP5 HPLEBN0400 04-24-:2 10:14:32 rev1 page 63 ROGER KIMBALL What We Are Fighting For The Example of Pericles MIDWAY THROUGH the long article on Afghanistan in the great eleventh edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, one comes across this description of the inhabitants of that ancient moun- tain country: The Afghans, inured to bloodshed from childhood, are familiar with death, and audacious in attack, but easily discouraged by failure; excessively turbulent and unsubmissive to law or dis- cipline; apparently frank and affable in manner, especially when they hope to gain some object, but capable of the grossest brutality when that hope ceases. They are unscrupulous in per- jury, treacherous, vain and insatiable, passionate in vindictive- ness, which they will satisfy at the cost of their own lives and in the most cruel manner. Nowhere is crime committed on such trifling grounds, or with such general impunity, though when it is punished the punishment is atrocious. Among themselves the Afghans are quarrelsome, intriguing and distrustful; estrange- ments and affrays are of constant occurrence; . The Afghan Hoover Press : Brave DP5 HPLEBN0400 04-24-:2 10:14:32 rev1 page 64 64 ROGER KIMBALL is by breed and nature a bird of prey. If from habit and tradition he respects a stranger within his threshold, he yet considers it legitimate to warn a neighbour of the prey that is afoot, or even overtake and plunder his guest after he has quitted his roof. That refreshingly frank passage, by Colonel Sir Thomas Hun- gerford Holdich, was published in 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Perspective on Political Correctness
    mrp.ase.ro A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLITICAL CORRECTNESS Ana SCALCĂU West University of Timisoara, Romania [email protected] Abstract The objective of this paper is to present some of the most relevant moments which have influenced the evolution of political correctness and to reveal the connection between these moments. The phenomenon appeared in America as an attempt to help certain categories of people which had been previously misrepresented or overlooked. In the 60’s it became part of the ideology of the American New Left, who helped it spread to the universities, inspired by cultural Marxism, German philosophy and postmodernism. Globalization has brought political correctness to Europe, but the Western countries have been more receptive to it than Eastern ones, which have experienced communism and could not help noticing the similarities. Keywords: political correctness, cultural Marxism, the Frankfurt School, nihilism, postmodernism, mini-narratives, deconstruction, freedom of speech, affirmative action, racial quotas, multiculturalism, banning words, negationism 1. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS The main objective of this paper is to present the evolution of political correctness and to describe some of the most relevant factors which have influenced its development. I have chosen to include sections on cultural Marxism, German philosophy and postmodernism in order to show the main cultural tendencies (multiculturalism, nihilism and deconstruction) which shaped the mind of the American intellectuals in the 60’s and made it possible for political correctness (the way we see it nowadays) to appear. I would like to point out the fact that the purpose of this paper is not to make an exhaustive mrp.ase.ro presentation of the Frankfurt School, German philosophy or postmodernism.
    [Show full text]
  • Alt-Stoicism? Actually, No…
    4 (6) 2018 DOI: 10.26319/6921 Matthew Sharpe Faculty of Arts and Education Deakin University Into the Heart of Darkness Or: Alt-Stoicism? Actually, No… In several conversations over the last months, people have independently raised a troubling sign of the times. Since the mid-2010s, it seems, “Alt-Right” bloggers have begun to populate Facebook and other online venues of the “Modern Stoicism” movement, claiming that the ancient philosophy vindicates their misogynistic and nativist views, complete with sometimes-erroneous “quotations” from Marcus Aurelius. Donna Zuckerberg, in several articles1 and in her recent book, Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age2, has done a courageous service to us all by examining and documenting this phenomenon. As she writes: The Red Pill emphasizes Stoicism practicality in nearly every article about the philosophy… Illimitable Men, a blog that uses a more literary and philosophical approach than most manosphere sites, lists Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations second in the top ten “books for men,” describing it as “helpful as a spiritual guide to dealing with, and perceiving life.” Meditations also appears on a list of “Comprehensive Red Pill Books” on the Red Pill subreddit, where it is described as “a very simple pathway to practical philosophy.” In a review of Epictetus’s Enchiridion on Return of Kings, Valizadeh praises Stoicism and claims that “Stoicism will give you more practical tools on 1) Donna Zuckerberg, “How to Be a Good Classicist Under a Bad Emperor,” Eidolon, November 22, 2016, https://eidolon.pub/how- to-be-a-good-classicist-under-a-bad-emperor-6b848df6e54a; Donna Zuckerberg, “So I Wrote a Thing,” Eidolon, October 8, 2018, https://eidolon.pub/so-i-wrote-a-thing-6726d9449a2b.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 YEAR in REVIEW a Letter from Our President and CEO Recently a Selection of Writings by Harry Bradley, One of Our Founders, Was Brought to My Attention
    2019 YEAR IN REVIEW A Letter from Our President and CEO Recently a selection of writings by Harry Bradley, one of our founders, was brought to my attention. Harry’s thoughts, which were put to paper in the 1950s, described how he and his brother Lynde started the Allen-Bradley Company and how their values enabled it to become a remarkable American success story. “Lynde wanted, and so did I, people who thought of their jobs not in terms of paychecks, but as the end result of their own work. We were small, but we were building for more than a day, and for more than a year. To us, every job was an open door to the high ground of human freedom and general happiness,” he wrote. Harry also shared his views on freedom, human dignity and American principles. “A nation’s progress is measured by the character of its people, and not by the promises of its politicians. It seems hard for politicians to comprehend one simple truth: There is no source of national income, but the work of the people,” he observed. Harry Bradley While Harry and Lynde lived in a very different era, their core principles and aspirations - the ability to improve society through education, innovation, and free markets; the role of government; and the application of the Constitution - continue to be at the heart of our country’s current philosophical debate. At such a critical time in our history, I know they would be pleased that the principles of American exceptionalism they so firmly believed in continue to be advanced every day through The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and its remarkable grant recipients.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Warfare: the 'Careless' Reinterpretation of Literary Canon
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE This is the accepted manuscript of the article, which has been published in Narrativeprovided by Trepo Inquiry - Institutional. 2019,Repository of Tampere University 29(2), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19019.nur Narrative Warfare: The ‘Careless’ Reinterpretation of Literary Canon in Online Antifeminism Matias Nurminen, Tampere University This article studies the use of literature and narrative strategies of online antifeminist movements. These movements classified under the umbrella term the manosphere, wage ideological narrative warfare to endorse a misogynistic worldview. The case at hand concentrates on the radical faction of neomasculinity and its attempts to reinterpret the Western canon of literature. I propose that neomasculine readings of novels such as Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita are careless interpretations that ground themselves on specific traits of the texts while ignoring others. These readings attempt to evoke a sense of recognition in the community that believes in an alleged feminist conspiracy against men. Careless interpretations borrow from post-truth rhetoric and the feminist literary theory tradition of reading against the grain. When confronted over their controversial views, neomasculine figures renarrativize readings to benefit the promotion of neomasculine perspectives. This strategic use of literature is part of the narrative warfare discussed in detail. Keywords: manosphere, resistant reading, post-truth, instrumental narratives, antifeminism, literary canon 1 Introduction This article analyses how online antifeminist movements, often classified under the umbrella term the manosphere, wage ideological narrative warfare to endorse a misogynistic worldview. The case at hand concentrates on neomasculinity, a particularly radical faction that has also been studied in classicist Donna Zuckerberg’s recent book Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Military Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?
    Issue 18 • September 2014 Is There a Military Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict? IN THIS ISSUE Andrew Roberts • Thomas H. Henriksen • Kori Schake • Peter Berkowitz Victor Davis Hanson • Edward N. Luttwak • Bruce Thornton Editorial Board Contents Victor Davis Hanson, Chair September 2014 · Issue 18 Bruce Thornton David Berkey Background Essay Just the Start of an Age-Old Conflict? by Andrew Roberts Contributing Members Peter Berkowitz Featured Commentary Max Boot Burning the Terrorist Grass by Thomas H. Henriksen Josiah Bunting III Angelo M. Codevilla Military Means for Political Ends in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Thomas Donnelly by Kori Schake Admiral James O. Ellis Jr. Colonel Joseph Felter Related Commentary Josef Joffe What Israel Won in Gaza & What Diplomacy Must Now Gain by Peter Berkowitz Frederick W. Kagan U.S. Must Strongly Affirm Israel’s Right of Self-Defense by Peter Berkowitz Kimberly Kagan Edward N. Luttwak The Middle East’s Maze of Alliances by Victor Davis Hanson Peter Mansoor Sherman in Gaza by Victor Davis Hanson General Jim Mattis Walter Russell Mead A Stronger Israel? by Victor Davis Hanson Mark Moyar Winning a Lose/Lose War by Victor Davis Hanson Williamson Murray Why Obama, Kerry, Abbas, Hamas, BDS, and Hezbollah Will All Go Poof! by Ralph Peters Andrew Roberts Edward Luttwak Admiral Gary Roughead The Incoherent Excuses for Hating Israel by Bruce Thornton Kori Schake Kiron K. Skinner Israel’s Worst Enemy: Lies and Myths by Bruce Thornton Barry Strauss Bing West Educational Materials Miles Maochun Yu Discussion Questions Amy Zegart Suggestions for Further Reading ABOUT THE POSTERS IN THIS ISSUE Documenting the wartime viewpoints and diverse political sentiments of the twentieth century, the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Poster Collection has more than one hundred thousand posters from around the world and continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Ramifications of a Fractured EU
    Issue 33 • July 2016 The Strategic Ramifications of a Fractured EU IN THIS ISSUE Andrew Roberts • Angelo M. Codevilla Josef Joffe Contents Editorial Board July 2016 · Issue 33 Victor Davis Hanson, Chair Bruce Thornton David Berkey Background Essay Brexit and the Defence of Europe by Andrew Roberts Contributing Members Peter Berkowitz Featured Commentary Max Boot Unity, Strategy, and Will by Angelo M. Codevilla Josiah Bunting III Angelo M. Codevilla Brexit: How Much Contagion, How Many Strategic Consequences! Thomas Donnelly by Josef Joffe Colonel Joseph Felter Josef Joffe Frederick W. Kagan Related Commentary Kimberly Kagan Brexit: Isolationism or Atlanticism? by Max Boot Edward N. Luttwak Peter R. Mansoor The Potential Perils of Grexit by Kori Schake Walter Russell Mead The Strategic Problems of Grexit by Barry Strauss Mark Moyar Williamson Murray The EU-Progressive Paradigm Is Falling Apart by Bruce Thornton Ralph Peters Andrew Roberts Why Brexit Alarms Britain’s Baltic Allies by Max Boot Admiral Gary Roughead Kori Schake Kiron K. Skinner Educational Materials Barry Strauss Discussion Questions Gil-li Vardi Bing West Miles Maochun Yu Amy Zegart ABOUT THE POSTERS IN THIS ISSUE Documenting the wartime viewpoints and diverse political sentiments of the twentieth century, the Hoover Institution Library & Archives Poster Collection has more than one hundred thousand posters from around the world and continues to grow. Thirty-three thousand are available online. Posters from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Russia/Soviet Union, and France predominate, though posters from more than eighty countries are included. Background Essay Issue 33 | July 2016 1 Brexit and the Defence of Europe Andrew Roberts Britain’s decision to leave the European Union (EU)—nicknamed “Brexit”—does not have anything like the security ramifications for the West that its opponents liked to pretend during the recent campaign.
    [Show full text]