DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Monogamy in Primates: a Phylogenetic Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE EVOLUTION OF MONOGAMY IN PRIMATES: A PHYLOGENETIC APPROACH A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Alana Hope Muhlberger May, 2011 Thesis written by Alana Hope Muhlberger B.A., Ohio University, 2009 M.A., Kent State University, 2011 Approved by _________________________________, Advisor Marilyn A. Norconk _________________________________, Chair, Department of Anthropology Richard S. Meindl _________________________________, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 8 1.1 Social System Terminology .................................................................................. 11 1.2 Monogamy ............................................................................................................ 12 1.3 Previous Work ...................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Research Questions ............................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 2: METHODS ................................................................................................ 25 2.1 Characters and Coding .......................................................................................... 25 2.1.1 Social Organization ...................................................................................... 25 2.1.2 Pair-Bond ..................................................................................................... 26 2.1.3 Duet Vocalizations ....................................................................................... 28 2.1.4 Paternal Care ................................................................................................ 29 2.1.5 Territorial Exclusivity .................................................................................. 30 2.1.6 Mechanisms of Territorial Defense ............................................................. 31 2.1.7 Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass .............................................................. 32 2.2 Species Used in the Analysis .......................................................................... 33 2.3 Sources of Data ..................................................................................................... 36 2.4 Phylogenetic Reconstruction ................................................................................ 37 iii CHAPTER 3: RESULTS .................................................................................................. 41 3.1 Social Organization .............................................................................................. 41 3.2 Pair-Bond .............................................................................................................. 45 3.3 Duet ....................................................................................................................... 47 3.4 Paternal Care ......................................................................................................... 49 3.5 Territorial Exclusivity ........................................................................................... 51 3.6 Mechanisms of Territorial Defense ...................................................................... 53 3.7 Sexual Dimorphism .............................................................................................. 56 3.8 Multi-Trait Comparisons ...................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION ............................................................................................ 65 4.1 Potential Confounding Factors .................................................................................. 65 4.2 Discussion of Research Questions .............................................................................. 66 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................... 77 APPENDICES Appendix A: Summary Database with Abbreviations ...................................................... 80 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 83 iv LIST OF FIGURES FIG. 1.1 Phylogenetic Reconstruction From Komers And Brotherton (1997) ................ 21 FIG. 2.1 Primate Phylogeny of Species Used in This Study ........................................... 40 FIG. 3.1 Reconstruction of Social Organization .............................................................. 44 FIG. 3.2 Reconstruction of Pair-Bonding ........................................................................ 46 FIG. 3.3 Reconstruction of Duetting ................................................................................ 48 FIG. 3.4 Reconstruction of Paternal Care ........................................................................ 50 FIG. 3.5 Reconstruction of Territorial Exclusivity .......................................................... 52 FIG. 3.6 Reconstruction of Mechanisms of Territorial Defense ..................................... 55 FIG. 3.7 Reconstruction of Sexual Dimorphism in Lemuroidea ..................................... 58 FIG. 3.8 Reconstruction of Sexual Dimorphism in Lemuroidea ..................................... 59 FIG. 3.9 Reconstruction of Sexual Dimorphism in Tarsiidae ......................................... 60 FIG. 3.10 Reconstruction of Sexual Dimorphism in Cebidae ......................................... 61 FIG. 3.11 Reconstruction of Sexual Dimorphism in Atelidae ......................................... 62 FIG. 3.12 Lineage-Specific Evolution of Monogamy ..................................................... 64 v LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1. General Patterns of Primate Social Systems ................................................ 10 TABLE 2.1 Coding the Category “Social Organization” ................................................ 26 TABLE 2.2. Coding the Category “Pair-Bond” ............................................................... 27 TABLE 2.3. Coding the Category “Duet Vocalizations” ................................................. 29 TABLE 2.4. Coding the Category “Paternal Care” .......................................................... 30 TABLE 2.5. Coding the Category “Territorial Exclusivity” ............................................ 31 TABLE 2.6. Coding the Category “Mechanisms of Territorial Defense” ........................ 32 TABLE 2.8. Primate Taxonomy Used in This Study ....................................................... 36 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor, Marilyn Norconk, for her openness to my ideas and her support and encouragement throughout the thesis process. Chi-hua Chiu is responsible for my interesting topic, and Mary Ann Raghanti was a patient and helpful sounding board and source of advice throughout my time at Kent. These three women have been inspiring and I am glad to have had the opportunity to work with them. The department of Anthropology would not be the same without our wonderful secretary, Caroline Tannert, whose organization and desire to help made the road to completion easier for myself and my peers. I would also like to thank Cynthia Thompson, Tremaine Gregory, Eric Seemiller, and Michael Veres for their input in our advisor meetings. My office-mate Cyndie has been especially invaluable, and I am grateful for her patient answers to my questions and for being a friend. Thank you to my parents, Beth and Gordon, to my brother, Eric, and to my boyfriend, Randy, for reading my drafts and sending me your love and support. This thesis has been possible and enjoyable because of all the people mentioned here. vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Social System Terminology In early studies of animal social systems, mating systems were equated with social systems, but observations of extra-group matings, reproductive suppression, and varying mating patterns of solitary foragers have prompted researchers to separate mating behavior from social behavior (Palombit, 1994; Manson, 2011; Goldizen, 1990). This has led to a modern terminology that subsumes mating system under the umbrella term ‘social system’, which also encompasses social organization and social structure (Zinner et al., 2003; Sterling, 1993; Kappeler and van Schaik, 2002). While mating system describes patterns of mating behavior and considers the genetic composition of the group's offspring (Emlen and Oring 1977), social organization is composed of group size, sexual composition, and cohesion of a group (Müller and Thalmann, 2000; Kappeler and van Schaik, 2002), and social structure describes the social relations among individuals (Zinner et al 2003). There are several generally accepted types of social systems. A list of mating systems, which are a part of social systems, might include monogamy (one breeding male and one breeding female), polygyny (one breeding male, multiple breeding females), polyandry (one breeding female, multiple breeding
Recommended publications
  • An Overview of the Vocal Repertoire of Indri Indri

    An Overview of the Vocal Repertoire of Indri Indri

    JASs Reports Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 88 (2010), pp. 151-165 Not just a pretty song: an overview of the vocal repertoire of Indri indri Giovanna Maretti1, Viviana Sorrentino1, Andriamasitoly Finomana2, Marco Gamba1 & Cristina Giacoma1 1) Department of Animal and Human Biology, University of Torino, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123 Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2) Faculté des Sciences, University of Mahajanga, Campus Ambondrona, BP 652, Mahajanga (401), Madagascar Summary - The vocal behaviour of wild indris inhabiting the area near Andasibe was studied by means of all occurrence sampling. We provide a quantitative overview of the vocal repertoire of Indri indri, describing qualitative contextual information and quantitative acoustic analysis for all the utterances we recorded from adult individuals. Other than the song, the repertoire of Indri indri comprises 8 vocal types uttered by the adults. Future studies are necessary to explore whether vocalisations uttered in different contexts have different functions and how these functions relate to acoustic structure. Keywords - Strepsirhine primates, Vocal behaviour, Acoustic structure, Ambient noise. Introduction The indri (Indri indri) is a particularly inter- esting species for the study of vocal communica- To investigate the relationship between vocal tion for at least three reasons. It lives in small and non-vocal behaviour, it is crucial to analyse family groups in lowland to mid-altitude primary vocal signals making up the vocal repertoire of a and secondary rainforest of eastern Madagascar species, to describe vocal types and, where possi- (Garbutt, 1999; Pollock, 1979), spending most ble, provide information regarding the variation of its time in the dense canopy.

  • Homologies of the Anterior Teeth in Lndriidae and a Functional Basis for Dental Reduction in Primates

    Homologies of the Anterior Teeth in lndriidae and a Functional Basis for Dental Reduction in Primates PHILIP D. GINGERICH Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 KEY WORDS Dental reduction a Lemuriform primates . Indriidae . Dental homologies - Dental scraper . Deciduous dentition - Avahi ABSTRACT In a recent paper Schwartz ('74) proposes revised homologies of the deciduous and permanent teeth in living lemuriform primates of the family Indriidae. However, new evidence provided by the deciduous dentition of Avahi suggests that the traditional interpretations are correct, specifically: (1) the lat- eral teeth in the dental scraper of Indriidae are homologous with the incisors of Lemuridae and Lorisidae, not the canines; (2) the dental formula for the lower deciduous teeth of indriids is 2.1.3; (3) the dental formula for the lower perma- nent teeth of indriids is 2.0.2.3;and (4)decrease in number of incisors during pri- mate evolution was usually in the sequence 13, then 12, then 11. It appears that dental reduction during primate evolution occurred at the ends of integrated in- cisor and cheek tooth units to minimize disruption of their functional integrity. Anterior dental reduction in the primate Schwartz ('74) recently reviewed the prob- family Indriidae illustrates a more general lem of tooth homologies in the dental scraper problem of direction of tooth loss in primate of Indriidae and concluded that no real evi- evolution. All living lemuroid and lorisoid pri- dence has ever been presented to support the mates (except the highly specialized Dauben- interpretation that indriids possess four lower tonid share a distinctive procumbent, comb- incisors and no canines.
  • PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED on Γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES

    PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED on Γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES

    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22, 3, 337-344 Phylogenetic(1999) relationships of Brazilian howler monkeys 337 PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED ON γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES Carla Maria Meireles1, John Czelusniak1, Stephen F. Ferrari2, Maria Paula Cruz Schneider2 and Morris Goodman1 ABSTRACT The genus Alouatta (howler monkeys) is the most widely distributed of New World primates, and has been arranged in three species groups: the Central American Alouatta palliata group and the South American Alouatta seniculus and Alouatta caraya groups. While the latter is monotypic, the A. seniculus group encompasses at least three species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul and A. fusca). In the present study, approximately 600 base pairs of the γ1-globin pseudogene were sequenced in the four Brazilian species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul, A. fusca and A. caraya). Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods yielded phylogenetic trees with the same arrangement: {A. caraya [A. seniculus (A. fusca, A. belzebul)]}. The most parsimoni- ous tree had bootstrap values greater than 82% for all groupings, and strength of grouping values of at least 2, supporting the sister clade of A. fusca and A. belzebul. The study also confirmed the presence of a 150-base pair Alu insertion element and a 1.8-kb deletion in the γ1-globin pseudogene in A. fusca, features found previously in the remaining three species. The cladistic classification based on molecular data agrees with those of morphological studies, with the monospecific A. caraya group being clearly differentiated from the A. seniculus group. INTRODUCTION southern Mexico to northern Argentina, and is found in tropical and subtropical forest ecosystems throughout Bra- The systematics of the New World monkeys (infra- zil (Hirsch et al., 1991).
  • Sex Differences in the Social Behavior of Juvenile Spider Monkeys (Ateles Geoffroyi) Michelle Amanda Rodrigues Iowa State University

    Sex Differences in the Social Behavior of Juvenile Spider Monkeys (Ateles Geoffroyi) Michelle Amanda Rodrigues Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2007 Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) Michelle Amanda Rodrigues Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Rodrigues, Michelle Amanda, "Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)" (2007). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 14829. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/14829 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) by Michelle Amanda Rodrigues A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: Anthropology Program of Study Committee: Jill D. Pruetz, Major Professor W. Sue Fairbanks Maximilian Viatori Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2007 Copyright © Michelle Amanda Rodrigues, 2007. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 1443144 UMI Microform 1443144 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ii For Travis, Goldie, Clydette, and Udi iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER 1.
  • Comparative Life History of the South Temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus Minutus) and North Temperate Remizidae Species

    Comparative Life History of the South Temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus Minutus) and North Temperate Remizidae Species

    J Ornithol (2017) 158:569–577 DOI 10.1007/s10336-016-1417-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparative life history of the south temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus minutus) and north temperate Remizidae species 1,2 1 1 Penn Lloyd • Bernhard D. Frauenknecht • Morne´ A. du Plessis • Thomas E. Martin3 Received: 19 June 2016 / Revised: 22 October 2016 / Accepted: 14 November 2016 / Published online: 22 November 2016 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2016 Abstract We studied the breeding biology of the south parental nestling care. Consequently, in comparison to the temperate Cape Penduline Tit (Anthoscopus minutus)in other two species, the Cape Penduline Tit exhibits greater order to compare its life history traits with those of related nest attentiveness during incubation, a similar per-nestling north temperate members of the family Remizidae, namely feeding rate and greater post-fledging survival. Its rela- the Eurasian Penduline Tit (Remiz pendulinus) and the tively large clutch size, high parental investment and Verdin (Auriparus flaviceps). We used this comparison to associated high adult mortality in a less seasonal environ- test key predictions of three hypotheses thought to explain ment are consistent with key predictions of the adult latitudinal variation in life histories among bird species— mortality hypothesis but not with key predictions of the the seasonality and food limitation hypothesis, nest pre- seasonality and food limitation hypothesis in explaining dation hypothesis and adult mortality hypothesis. Contrary life history variation among Remizidae species. These to the general pattern of smaller clutch size and lower adult results add to a growing body of evidence of the impor- mortality among south-temperate birds living in less sea- tance of age-specific mortality in shaping life history sonal environments, the Cape Penduline Tit has a clutch evolution.
  • Mouse Breeding Colony Management 1. Mouse Reproduction A. General Mouse Information I. the Average Mouse Lives Approximately

    Mouse Breeding Colony Management 1. Mouse Reproduction A. General Mouse Information I. the Average Mouse Lives Approximately

    Mouse Breeding Colony Management 1. Mouse Reproduction A. General Mouse Information i. The average mouse lives approximately 2.5 years; however, the reproductive life span of mice is significantly shorter at 7-8 months. ii. Most mice reach sexual maturity (males and females) at 4-7 weeks of age. Younger mice generally produce smaller litters and therefore are not typically mated until they reach 6-8 weeks, of age. Mice that have been housed alone or in same-sex pairs will usually not breed successfully if they are older than 6-8 months. iii. The mouse estrous cycle is 4-5 days in length. Mice cycle continuously throughout the year (non-seasonal breeders). Female mice are only receptive to males when they are in estrus. Mating typically occurs at night (lights off). Ovulation occurs 8-12 hours after the onset of estrous. iv. If fertilization occurs, fetuses can be palpated by day 14. v. Gestation in mice is typically 19-21 days (strain dependent). vi. Parturition in mice may last 1-3 hours and frequently occurs at night. Females will go into estrus within 24 hours of parturition and are sexually receptive during this time. vii. Litter size varies among strains, but averages 4-12 pups. Inbred mice tend to have smaller litters than outbred mice. viii. Mice are typically weaned at 21-28 days or at 10g of body weight. The Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee requires that mouse pups be weaned at 21 days unless PACUC approval is given on an approved animal use protocol. See Policy attached.
  • The Evolution of the Lepilemuridae-Cheirogaleidae Clade

    The Evolution of the Lepilemuridae-Cheirogaleidae Clade

    The evolution of the Lepilemuridae-Cheirogaleidae clade By Curswan Allan Andrews Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Faculty of SCIENCE at the NELSON MANDELA UNIVERSITY Promoters Prof. Judith C. Masters Dr. Fabien G.S. Génin Prof. Graham I.H. Kerley April 2019 1 i Dedication To my mothers’ Cecelia Andrews & Johanna Cloete ii DECLARATION FULL NAME: Curswan Allan Andrews STUDENT NUMBER: 214372952 QUALIFICATION: Doctor of Philosophy DECLARATION: In accordance with Rule G5.6.3, I hereby declare that the above-mentioned thesis is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment to another University or for another qualification. Signature ________________ Curswan Andrews iii ABSTRACT The Lepilemuridae and the Cheirogaleidae, according to recent molecular reconstructions, share a more recent common ancestor than previously thought. Further phylogenetic reconstructions have indicated that body size evolution in this clade was marked by repeated dwarfing events that coincided with changes in the environment. I aimed to investigate the morphological implications of changes in body size within the Lepilemur-cheirogaleid clade, testing four predictions. Together with Dr. Couette, I collected data on the overall palate shape and predicted that shape is likely to be influenced by several factors including phylogeny, body size and diet. Geometric morphometric analyses revealed that, although a strong phylogenetic signal was detected, diet had the major effect on palate shape. In a similar vein, when examining the arterial circulation patterns in these taxa, I predicted that changes in body size would result in changes and possible reductions in arterial size, particularly the internal carotid artery (ICA) and stapedial artery (SA).
  • Black Capped Capuchin (Cebus Apella)

    Black Capped Capuchin (Cebus Apella)

    Husbandry Manual For Brown Capuchin/Black-capped Capuchin Cebus apella (Cebidae) Author: Joel Honeysett Date of Preparation: March 2006 Sydney Institute of TAFE, Ultimo Course Name and Number: Captive Animals. Lecturer: Graeme Phipps TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Subspecies ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Recent Synonyms ........................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Other Common Names ................................................................................................... 5 3 Natural History ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Morphometrics ............................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Mass And Basic Body Measurements ....................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Sexual Dimorphism ..................................................................................................
  • Fascinating Primates 3/4/13 8:09 AM Ancient Egyptians Used Traits of an Ibis Or a Hamadryas Used Traits Egyptians Ancient ) to Represent Their God Thoth

    Fascinating Primates 3/4/13 8:09 AM Ancient Egyptians Used Traits of an Ibis Or a Hamadryas Used Traits Egyptians Ancient ) to Represent Their God Thoth

    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Fascinating Primates Fascinating The Beginning of an Adventure Ever since the time of the fi rst civilizations, nonhuman primates and people have oc- cupied overlapping habitats, and it is easy to imagine how important these fi rst contacts were for our ancestors’ philosophical refl ections. Long ago, adopting a quasi- scientifi c view, some people accordingly regarded pri- mates as transformed humans. Others, by contrast, respected them as distinct be- ings, seen either as bearers of sacred properties or, conversely, as diabolical creatures. A Rapid Tour around the World In Egypt under the pharaohs, science and religion were still incompletely separated. Priests saw the Papio hamadryas living around them as “brother baboons” guarding their temples. In fact, the Egyptian god Thoth was a complex deity combining qualities of monkeys and those of other wild animal species living in rice paddies next to temples, all able to sound the alarm if thieves were skulking nearby. At fi rst, baboons represented a local god in the Nile delta who guarded sacred sites. The associated cult then spread through middle Egypt. Even- tually, this god was assimilated by the Greeks into Hermes Trismegistus, the deity measuring and interpreting time, the messenger of the gods. One conse- quence of this deifi cation was that many animals were mummifi ed after death to honor them. Ancient Egyptians used traits of an ibis or a Hamadryas Baboon (Papio hamadryas) to represent their god Thoth.
  • Exam 1 Set 3 Taxonomy and Primates

    Exam 1 Set 3 Taxonomy and Primates

    Goodall Films • Four classic films from the 1960s of Goodalls early work with Gombe (Tanzania —East Africa) chimpanzees • Introduction to Chimpanzee Behavior • Infant Development • Feeding and Food Sharing • Tool Using Primates! Specifically the EXTANT primates, i.e., the species that are still alive today: these include some prosimians, some monkeys, & some apes (-next: fossil hominins, who are extinct) Diversity ...200$300&species& Taxonomy What are primates? Overview: What are primates? • Taxonomy of living • Prosimians (Strepsirhines) – Lorises things – Lemurs • Distinguishing – Tarsiers (?) • Anthropoids (Haplorhines) primate – Platyrrhines characteristics • Cebids • Atelines • Primate taxonomy: • Callitrichids distinguishing characteristics – Catarrhines within the Order Primate… • Cercopithecoids – Cercopithecines – Colobines • Hominoids – Hylobatids – Pongids – Hominins Taxonomy: Hierarchical and Linnean (between Kingdoms and Species, but really not a totally accurate representation) • Subspecies • Species • Genus • Family • Infraorder • Order • Class • Phylum • Kingdom Tree of life -based on traits we think we observe -Beware anthropocentrism, the concept that humans may regard themselves as the central and most significant entities in the universe, or that they assess reality through an exclusively human perspective. Taxonomy: Kingdoms (6 here) Kingdom Animalia • Ingestive heterotrophs • Lack cell wall • Motile at at least some part of their lives • Embryos have a blastula stage (a hollow ball of cells) • Usually an internal
  • 7 Gibbon Song and Human Music from An

    7 Gibbon Song and Human Music from An

    Gibbon Song and Human Music from an 7 Evolutionary Perspective Thomas Geissmann Abstract Gibbons (Hylobates spp.) produce loud and long song bouts that are mostly exhibited by mated pairs. Typically, mates combine their partly sex-specific repertoire in relatively rigid, precisely timed, and complex vocal interactions to produce well-patterned duets. A cross-species comparison reveals that singing behavior evolved several times independently in the order of primates. Most likely, loud calls were the substrate from which singing evolved in each line. Structural and behavioral similarities suggest that, of all vocalizations produced by nonhuman primates, loud calls of Old World monkeys and apes are the most likely candidates for models of a precursor of human singing and, thus, human music. Sad the calls of the gibbons at the three gorges of Pa-tung; After three calls in the night, tears wet the [traveler's] dress. (Chinese song, 4th century, cited in Van Gulik 1967, p. 46). Of the gibbons or lesser apes, Owen (1868) wrote: “... they alone, of brute Mammals, may be said to sing.” Although a few other mammals are known to produce songlike vocalizations, gibbons are among the few mammals whose vocalizations elicit an emotional response from human listeners, as documented in the epigraph. The interesting questions, when comparing gibbon and human singing, are: do similarities between gibbon and human singing help us to reconstruct the evolution of human music (especially singing)? and are these similarities pure coincidence, analogous features developed through convergent evolution under similar selective pressures, or the result of evolution from common ancestral characteristics? To my knowledge, these questions have never been seriously assessed.
  • Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates

    Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates

    YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 30:75-105 (1987) Diagnosis and Differentiation of the Order Primates FREDERICK S. SZALAY, ALFRED L. ROSENBERGER, AND MARIAN DAGOSTO Department of Anthropolog* Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York 10021 (F.S.S.); University of Illinois, Urbanq Illinois 61801 (A.L. R.1; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University/ Baltimore, h4D 21218 (M.B.) KEY WORDS Semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, Suborders Strepsirhini and Haplorhini, Semisuborder Anthropoidea, Cranioskeletal morphology, Adapidae, Omomyidae, Grades vs. monophyletic (paraphyletic or holophyletic) taxa ABSTRACT We contrast our approach to a phylogenetic diagnosis of the order Primates, and its various supraspecific taxa, with definitional proce- dures. The order, which we divide into the semiorders Paromomyiformes and Euprimates, is clearly diagnosable on the basis of well-corroborated informa- tion from the fossil record. Lists of derived features which we hypothesize to have been fixed in the first representative species of the Primates, Eupri- mates, Strepsirhini, Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea, are presented. Our clas- sification of the order includes both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups, depending on the nature of the available evidence. We discuss in detail the problematic evidence of the basicranium in Paleo- gene primates and present new evidence for the resolution of previously controversial interpretations. We renew and expand our emphasis on postcra- nial analysis of fossil and living primates to show the importance of under- standing their evolutionary morphology and subsequent to this their use for understanding taxon phylogeny. We reject the much advocated %ladograms first, phylogeny next, and scenario third” approach which maintains that biologically founded character analysis, i.e., functional-adaptive analysis and paleontology, is irrelevant to genealogy hypotheses.