DOCSLIB.ORG

M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures Alternatives Considered Workbook – User Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

M4M4 CorridorCorridor EnhancementEnhancement MeasuresMeasures AlternativesAlternatives ConsideredConsidered MeasuresMeasures discardedfalling outside from of the the M4 M4 CEM CEM Programme Programme 1 Contents Page Workbook User Guide 2 Key information and Glossary 3 Alternatives considered and discarded Key information sheet 4 Page Measure 1: New M4 lagoon barrage 22 Alternatives considered and could be delivered outside Measure 2: Corporation Road Link 23 of the M4 CEM Programme Measure 3: Celtic Springs and Rogerstone link 24 Page Measure 4: M48 and Second Severn Crossing link 25 Measure 1: B4245 and M48 link 6 Measure 5: Hard shoulder running lanes on M4 26 Measure 2: Cardiff Peripheral Distributor Road 7 Measure 6: Upgrade Steelworks Access Road to 3 lanes 27 Measure 3: Sustainability checklists for developments 8 Measure 7: On-line widening of M4 to dual 3 lanes 28 Measure 4: School Travel Planning 9 Measure 8: Motorway access westbound at J25 29 Measure 5: Workplace Travel Planning 10 Measure 9: Introduce climbing lanes at High Cross 30 Measure 6: Car sharing scheme 11 Measure 10: Introduce climbing lanes at St Julian’s Hill 31 Measure 7: Town centre development planning 12 Measure 11: Bus priority on M4 32 Measure 8: Flexible working arrangements 13 Measure 12: Intercity bus services 33 Measure 9: Travel education programme 14 Measure 13: Reduce public transport fares 34 Measure 10: ICT investment 15 Measure 14: Reregulate commercial bus services 35 Measure 11: Maintain or increase Severn Crossing Tolls 16 Measure 15: Increase fuel duty 36 Measure 12: Reduce or remove Severn Crossing Tolls 17 Measure 16: Increase parking enforcement 37 Measure 13: Collaborative working 18 Measure 17: Increase parking charges 38 Measure 14: Grade separated improvements to A48 SDR 19 Measure 18: Introduce flexible cross border bus passes 39 Measure 15: Closure of J27 to motorway 20 Measure 19: Fuel efficient cars programme 40 Measure 20: Incremental widening along M4 41 Measure 21: Active Traffic Management System on M4 42 2 M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures Alternatives Considered Workbook – User Guide What will I find in this workbook? What is this workbook all about? Within this workbook you will find a number of different measures that have not progressed to form part of the Packages. On 27 July 2011 the M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures Programme initiated detailed work with a specially selected This workbook presents the omitted measures - offering a high level overview of what the measure would involve, its likely Forum of Stakeholders, representing a breadth of interests impacts and implementation issues. An explanation is provided for its discarding from the M4 CEM programme, in from the public, private and third sectors in South Wales. addition to an action for relevant parties to pursue where appropriate. Thirty four members of the Stakeholder Forum convened with representatives of Welsh Government and Arup staff to explore over 100 possible solutions, old and new, to safety, capacity and resilience related problems associated with travel in the M4 corridor between Magor and Castleton. Building on the robust exploration of possible solutions In order to help make the appraisal information facilitated by the Forum , the WG and Arup team have How are the packaged measures appraised? easier to understand, each measure is assessed developed four ‘Packages’ of measures that work together through appraisal tables using a 7-scale optimally to address the problems of the M4 Corridor, Arup have appraised each measure to identify: colour coding system: Magor to Castleton. • what it would entail; • what impacts it could have on the economy, society and Large Positive Impact (+++) Package development has involved further research into the environment, in the context of M4 CEM Programme Aims, and Moderate Positive Impact (++) feasibility and deliverability into selected measures – both on WelTAG criteria; Slight Positive Impact (+) a stand-alone basis, and again in the context of the complete • its compatibility with other measures as part of the package; No (or Minimal) Impact (N) package of complementary measures. • how well it addresses the goals of the programme; and Slight Negative Impact (-) • its acceptability, feasibility, deliverability and risks. The resulting four option ‘Packages’, plus a ‘Do- Moderate Negative Impact (--) minimum’ scenario, are each presented within a dedicated Large Negative Impact (---) At this stage, the appraisal of measures is often still “high level”. In workbook. Each ‘Package’ offers a core scheme, practise this means traffic modelling work and assessment of traffic comprising one or more measures, supported by a number of The impacts are appraised in terms of the likely flow and accident data is undertaken, for comparative purposes. supplementary traffic management, public transport and effect each measure would have on the M4 Further technical appraisal is required during project delivery sustainable travel measures. Corridor transport conditions, as defined in following formal public consultation early next year, when a decision Programme Goals and WelTAG criteria. is made with respect to strategy implementation. This workbook presents the ‘alternatives considered’ – which include possible solutions that will not be progressed through the M4 CEM programme, following the packaging process. How should I use this workbook? The measures fall into two categories: This package identifies the measures that will not be progressed through the M4 CEM Programme, following the 1. Those that will help towards meeting the objectives packaging process. Should you feel that some of these measures should be part of the Programme, please let us know. but could be delivered by others outside of the M4 CEM Programme; and 2. Those which have been discarded due to poor performance against the M4 CEM Programme objectives. 3 2 Key information and Glossary Key information sheets Appraisal summary worksheets A key information sheet is provided at the beginning of this An appraisal summary worksheet sets out details of workbook to offer a summary description of its content. It Measures, providing an appraisal at a high level to identify identifies a number of measures that have been considered the likely impacts on the economy, society and environment. but discarded as part of the M4 CEM Programme. The potential acceptability, deliverability, feasibility and risk of the measure are also considered. Economic impact – this is a description of the impact of a measure on the economy, at a local, regional and/or national level. Economic outcomes against which a measure is appraised include: • Access to employment opportunities; • Connectivity within Wales and internationally; • Efficient, reliable and sustainable movement of people; • Efficient, reliable and sustainable movement of freight; • Access to visitor attractions. Social impact – the impact of a measure on people and communities. Social outcomes against which a measure is appraised include: • Access to healthcare; • Access to education, training and lifelong learning; • Access to shopping and leisure facilities; • Is healthy lifestyle encouraged; • Safety of travel. Environmental impact – the impact of a measure on the environment. Environmental outcomes against which a measure is appraised include: • Use of sustainable materials; • Contribution to greenhouse gas emissions; • Impact on climate change; • Contribution to air pollution; • Impact on the local environment; • Impact on heritage; • Impact on biodiversity. 4 3 M4 Corridor Enhancement Measures: Key Information Sheet Alternatives Considered What are ‘alternatives considered’? The ‘alternatives considered’ are measures that have been identified by either policy makers, stakeholders or the public – some of which may have merit in addressing some of the M4 CEM objectives. However, following detailed analysis and consideration as part of the packaging of the possible measures; these ‘alternatives considered’ fall outside of the M4 CEM Programme, for a number of possible reasons. The Lagoon measures fall into two categories: Barrage 1. Those that will help towards meeting the objectives but could be delivered by others outside of the Junction Highway M4 CEM Programme; and closures upgrades 2. Those which have been discarded due to poor performance against the M4 CEM Programme objectives. What will happen to the measures falling outside of M4 CEM that are still good ideas? Policy Climbing Each measure’s Appraisal Summary Worksheet sets out an action for the Welsh Government. Whilst poor measures lanes performing measures may not be pursued; those that have merit will be passed onto the relevant potential delivery bodies for consideration. It is important to Welsh Government that these measures that have some merit in helping address the wider transport problems in South Wales will not be lost. Therefore this Workbook will be used to raise these ideas and help join up thinking between different Welsh Government departments and other potential delivery bodies. Alternatives Considered Why have some measures been discarded and what will happen to them? Education Bus prioirty Following appraisal, some measures considered have been identified to have large adverse impacts and programmes on M4 deliverability issues. There may be a number of reasons why a measure presented as an alternative considered has been discarded from the M4 CEM programme. Each measure is presented through an Appraisal Summary Worksheet in this booklet
Recommended publications
  • M42 Junction 6 Improvement Scheme

    M42 Junction 6 Improvement Scheme

    M42 junction 6 Improvement scheme Statutory public consultation 9 January 2018 to 19 February 2018 Contents Introduction ........................................... 3 The scheme in detail (maps) ................. 16 Consultation .......................................... 4 Proposed land requirements ................. 19 Why do we need How this scheme may impact this scheme? ......................................... 6 on you .................................................. 20 Construction impacts ........................... 24 Scheme benefits and objectives ....................................... 7 What happens next ............................. 25 Evolution of the scheme ...................... 8 Proposed timeline ................................. 25 The preferred route ............................. 9 Consultation events ........................... 26 Incorporating your views .................. 10 Consultation information available ......... 26 Deposit point locations ...................... 27 What are we proposing .......................11 Contact information ............................... 27 Cycle routes and non-motorised users (NMU) ................................................... 12 Consultation questionnaire ............... 28 Traffic ................................................... 14 Impacts on the environment ................. 15 2 Introduction Highways England is a Government-owned During 2016, we identified and assessed a number company. We are responsible for the operation, of options to improve the junction. Following
  • Volume 5.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019

    Volume 5.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019

    Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers M4 junctions 3 to 12 smart motorway TR010019 5.1 Consultation report Revision 0 March 2015 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 5.0 Volume An executive agency of the Department for Transport HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 SCHEME OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 PURPOSE OF REPORT ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 CONSULTATION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................................. 13 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................
  • Birmingham ■ B76 1Al

    Birmingham ■ B76 1Al

    maybrook business park BLOCK 10 ■ MINWORTH ■ BIRMINGHAM ■ B76 1AL Last remaining units - incentives available High Quality Industrial & Warehouse Units To Let - from 2,000 sq ft to 3,000 sq ft ■ Modern, fully refurbished units ■ Electric sectional shutter doors ■ Excellent motorway access ■ Open plan offices ■ Close to Birmingham City Centre ■ Male & female toilets WC’s BIRMINGHAM www.maybrookbusinesspark.co.uk maybrook business park BLOCK 10 ■ MINWORTH ■ BIRMINGHAM ■ B76 1AL DESCRIPTION The units benefit from modern steel clad roof and elevations providing thermal insulation to modern standards, concrete floor, 4m eaves (3.5m working height), an electric insulated sectional shutter door and is lit by way of sodium lighting. The offices provide a combination of reception area, toilets, kitchenette and an open plan office area. The offices are carpeted throughout and provide lighting and electric security grilles to windows and shutter to entrance door. Externally, there are demised car parking spaces and a loading area to the unit frontage. Sat Nav Ref A A A51 A51 M6 TollM6 Junction Toll Junction T3 T3 B76 1AL A38 A38 11 11 LOCATION A38 A38 11 11 M6TM6T M42M42 10a 10a The premises are located on the Maybrook M6 ToM6ll Junction Toll Junction T1 T1 A5 A5 A460 A460 M42 JunctionM42 Junction 9 9 Business Park, a popular and multi-occupied estate WalmleyWalmley Ash Ash WOLVERHAMPTOWOLVERHAMPTON N A4 A4 WALSWAALLSALL T3 T3 A5 A5 extending with current tenants including NHS, A4097A4097 9 9 Speedy Hire Group, Edmundson Electrical, Collier 49 49 7 7 SandwelSandwell l 8 8 T1 9 T1 9 TyburTnyburn A38 A38 Motor Group and DHL.
  • Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let to Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let To

    Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let to Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let To

    MARBLE PORTFOLIO SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO MARBLE PORTFOLIO SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO Investment Summary ◆ Opportunity to acquire a south east focused portfolio ◆ All units let to the secure covenant of Multi Tile Limited of well-let trade counter units. (t/a Topps Tiles) ◆ 6 prominent trade counter units totalling ◆ AWULT of c.4.5 years unexpired (certain) 50,517 sq ft (4,693.1 sq m) ◆ Total passing rent of £638,680 per annum ◆ Situated in strong towns/cities within established ◆ All leases subject to annual RPI lined review with a minimum trade locations uplift of 2.5% with the exception of Glasgow which has ◆ Topps Tiles have continued to pay their rent a minimum of 2% uplift throughout the lockdown period ◆ All properties held on Freehold/ Heritable interests Proposal ◆ We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £8,515,000 (Eight Million, Five Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Pounds), subject to contract and exclusive of VAT. A purchase at this level provides a Net Initial Yield of 7.00%, which will rise every year in accordance with the fixed rental increases. YIELD PROFILE: Yield profile assumes 2.5% uplifts and continued occupancy on the same lease terms. 2021 7. 2 0 % 2023 7. 5 0 % 2025 7.9 0 % 2027 8.30% 2029 8.70% 2022 7. 4 0 % 2024 7. 70 % 2026 8.10% 2028 8.50% 2030 9.00% MARBLE PORTFOLIO OF SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO TOPPS TILES PORTFOLIO GLASGOW Covenant Multi Tile Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Topps Tiles PLC and for the year ending 29/09/2019 Multi-Tile Limited reported a pre-tax profit of £9.08M and Shareholders funds of £197.213M.
  • Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation

    Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation

    Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation Yufei Yuan This thesis is a result from a project funded by Delft University of Technology (TUDelft) and the Netherlands Research School for Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics (TRAIL). Cover illustration: Yufei Yuan and Jing Wei Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 19 maart 2013 om 10:00 uur door Yufei YUAN Master of Science in Transport and Planning geboren te Guilin, China Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. S.P. Hoogendoorn Copromotor: Dr. ir. J.W.C. van Lint Samenstelling promotiecommissie : Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. S.P. Hoogendoorn, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Dr. ir. J.W.C. van Lint, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. dr. ir. C. Vuik, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. ir. L.H. Immers, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. R.E. Wilson, University of Bristol Prof. dr. L. Leclercq, Ecole´ Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’Etat´ Prof. dr. P.B. Mirchandani, Arizona State University Prof. dr. ir. B. van Arem, Technische Universiteit Delft, reservelid TRAIL Thesis Series no. T2013/5, the Netherlands Research School TRAIL TRAIL P.O. Box 5017 2600 GA Delft The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0) 15 278 6046 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-90-5584-162-2 Copyright c 2013 by Yufei Yuan All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in- cluding photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the author.
  • Questions to the Mayor

    Questions to the Mayor

    Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 14 October 2009 South London Line Question No: 2651 / 2009 Jenny Jones Will you express your support for the retention of the South London rail service from Victoria to London Bridge via Denmark Hill, and oppose any reduction in this service that is carried out for financial reasons rather than capacity reasons? Oral response given Missing Updates Question No: 2932 / 2009 John Biggs Are there any unusual, novel, or contentious issues that have arisen since the last Mayor’s Question Time meeting, which you have failed to include in either your last written report or your oral update today? Oral response given Limousines and chauffeurs for the Met’s senior officers Question No: 2939 / 2009 Dee Doocey Following your comments at last months MQT, where you said that cars that ferry around Ministers, civil servants, and other people on the ‘taxpayer’s payroll’ should be got rid of, will you be taking action to abolish limousines and chauffeurs for senior MPS officers? Oral response given London Plan Question No: 3106 / 2009 Steve O’Connell What does the Mayor consider to be the most important aspects of the latest draft of the London Plan and how do they reflect his priorities for London? Oral response given 1 Young People Question No: 2745 / 2009 Joanne McCartney What recent initiatives have you delivered for young people in London? Oral response given Congestion Charge Question No: 3072 / 2009 Victoria Borwick Further to your answers to questions 3014/2008 and 1053/2009 on helping the retail economy the Mayor said he would re-look at bringing forward the post-Christmas Congestion Charge-free days to before Christmas.
  • Directions to Edgbaston Golf Club Church Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TB

    Directions to Edgbaston Golf Club Church Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TB

    Directions to Edgbaston Golf Club Church Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TB Edgbaston Golf Club is situated just over one mile SW of the centre of Birmingham making it easily accessible by car, train, air or taxi. From the North Leave the M6 motorway at Junction 6 (Spaghetti Junction) and take the A38(M) into the city. Stay in the right hand lane signposted A38 South West. Go over the flyover and then under all of the tunnels.You will emerge on the south side of the city on the A38. Go straight on at the first set of traffic lights with McDonalds on your right and at the next traffic lights take the right hand lane and turn into Wellington Road. Continue on that road until you come to a small roundabout, with a school on your left. Take the second turning (Church Road) with the church on your left hand side. Edgbaston Golf Club entrance is immediately on your left before the traffic lights. (If you miss the Wellington Road turning you will not be able to turn right into Priory Road but will need to continue to Edgbaston Park Road where you can turn right- see below). From the South East Leave the M42 motorway at Junction 3 and take the A435 towards Birmingham City Centre. Stay on this road passing through Kings Heath. Shortly after going through Kings Heath turn left into Queensbridge Road. Go straight on at the small traffic island into Russell Road. At the next island turn left into Edgbaston Road. The Edgbaston Cricket Ground is now on your right.
  • Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain

    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
  • M4 Newport Controlled Motorway Scheme, Wales

    M4 Newport Controlled Motorway Scheme, Wales

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL ENERGY AND TRANSPORT M4 Newport Controlled Motorway Scheme, Wales TEMPO Secretariat & the Euro-Regional Evaluation Expert Group STR08_M4_Newport_Controlled_Motorway.doc EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG-TREN TEMPO G UIDELINES FOR REPORTING EVALUATION RESULTS TEMPO S ECRETARIAT Document details: Date of preparation: February 2009 Abstract: Document number: 5028956/261/114 Document version: Issue 2 Status: Issued for general use within TEMPO projects Dissemination level: Public Distribution: TEMPO projects Key audience: Project evaluation managers European Commission Associated texts: Name Organisation Project Tel: Email: Authors: Ceri-Anne Traffic Wales +44 1454 662076 Ceri- Pridham anne.pridham@atkins global.com George Traffic Wales +44 1454 662074 George.Plokamakis@ Plokamakis atkinsglobal.com Document Control Record: Version Main Changes: Contributions from: Date: Issue 1 Initial issue 17 September 2008 Issue 2 Details for Planned evaluation Ceri-Anne Pridham February 2009 STR08_M4_Newport_Controlled_Motorway.doc Page ii EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG-TREN TEMPO G UIDELINES FOR REPORTING EVALUATION RESULTS TEMPO E VALUATION EXPERT GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. KEY EVALUATION RESULTS ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Impact on Traffic Flow ..............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Impact on Increased Safety......................................................................................................................1
  • The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 and Shall Come Into Force on 17Th May 2002

    The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 and Shall Come Into Force on 17Th May 2002

    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 1179 HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/ Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 Made - - - - 26th April 2002 Coming into force - - 17th May 2002 The Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions makes this Order in exercise of powers conferred by sections 10 and 12 of the Highways Act 1980(1) and now vested in him(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf:— 1. This Order may be cited as the A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 and shall come into force on 17th May 2002. 2. In this Order— (i) “the plan” means the plan folio numbered HA 10/OD/307 consisting of sheets 1, 2 and 3 and marked “The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002,” signed by the authority of the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and deposited at DTLR Records Management Branch, Floor 13 (IMD), Ashdown House, St. Leonards on Sea, Hastings, East Sussex TN37 7GA; (ii) “principal road” as a classification for a highway, means that the highway is a principal road for the purposes of enactments and instruments which refer to highways classified as principal roads and is also classified for the purpose of every other enactment and instrument which refers to highways classified by the Secretary of State; and (iii) “the trunk road” means the A38 Trunk Road 3. The length of the trunk road described in the Schedule to this Order shall cease to be a trunk road and shall be classified as a principal road from the date on which the Order comes into force.
  • Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network

    Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Transport Visions Vehicles and Infrastructure The fourth of eight reports from the Transport Visions Network Authors Greg Marsden, Glenn Lyons, Mark Beecroft and Kiron Chatterjee Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton Editorial Board Jennifer Abley Cranfield University Mags Adams Lancaster University Simon Barnett Suffolk County Council Gary Burnett University of Nottingham Ali Clabburn Liftshare.com Richard Clegg University of York Matthew Frost Nottingham Trent University Simon Hubbard Peter Brett Associates Toby Rackliff Dumfries and Galloway Council Andrew Salkeld Leicester City Council The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, as sponsors of the Transport Visions Network, are very gratefully acknowledged. The views of individuals conveyed in this report are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 1 Published by Landor Publishing Ltd Quadrant House 250 Kennington Lane London SE11 5RD First published February 2002 © Landor Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 1 899650 28 8 No responsibility for any loss as a consequence of any person relying upon the information or the views contained in this publication is accepted by the authors, contributors, or publishers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................5 Introduction........................................................................9 1. Today's Vehicles and Infrastructure ............................ 13 2. Tomorrow's Vehicles and Infrastructure..................... 23 3. A Vision: Control Culture............................................
  • Effective Road and Traffic Management: Memoranda Received

    Effective Road and Traffic Management: Memoranda Received

    This bundle: 55 & 56 Effective road and traffic management: Memoranda Received No. Author 28 National Grid plc 01 Leornard Wells 28a Supplementary from National Grid plc 02 David Nelsey 29 National Joint Utilities Group (NJUG) 03 English Heritage 29a Supplementary from NJUG 04 Ken Todd 30 Stagecoach Group plc 05 Urban Traffic Management & Control (UTMC) 31 Road Haulage Association (RHA) 05a Supplementary from UTMC and the IHE 32 Capita Symonds 06 Intelligent Transport Systems (UK) 33 Donald Bowler 06a Supplementary from ITS (UK) 34 Stephen Plowden 07 Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) 35 City of London Corporation 08 David Metz 36 Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT) 09 London TravelWatch 36a Supplementary from CILT 10 Passenger Focus 37 Jonathan Smith 11 Surrey County Council 38 Tony Wyer 12 ADEPT 39 Institution of Engineering and Technology 13 Cambridge Cycling Campaign 40 Transport Planning Society 14 Institute of Highway Engineers (IHE) 41 AA 15 Martin Cassini 42 Joint Authorities Group (UK) 16 Passenger Transport Executive Group (pteg) 43 CTC, the national cyclists' organisation 16a Supplementary from pteg 44 Halcrow 17 RAC Foundation 45 Chris Leithead 18 Campaign for Better Transport 46 Sustrans 19 liftshare 47 Freight Transport Association (FTA) 20 MIRA 48 Living Streets 21 Local Government Technical Advisers Group 49 Motorcycle Action Group (UK) 22 Chartered Institute of Highways and Transport 50 Cadence Driver Development 23 Network Rail 51 Motor Cycle Industry Association (MCI) 24 Kapsch TrafficCom 52 Greater London Authority 25 Department for Transport 53 Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) 26 Michael Coles 54 London Councils 26a Further evidence from Michael Coles 55 Cycle Sheffield 27 Green Light Group (GLG) 56 Nottinghamshire County Council Written evidence from Leonard Wells (ETM 01) I am a 70 year old pensioner.