DOCSLIB.ORG

1965-66 Victoria Maple Leafs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1965-66 Victoria Maple Leafs Victoria Maple Leafs 1965-66 Date Home Score Away Score Result Pts Notes W L T October 15, 1965 Vancouver Canucks 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 W 2 1 October 16, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 7 Vancouver Canucks 2 W 4 2 October 17, 1965 Seattle Totems 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 1 October 23, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 Portland Buckaroos 2 W 6 3 October 24, 1965 Portland Buckaroos 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 W 8 4 October 27, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 San Francisco Seals 3 T 9 1 October 30, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 7 Cleveland Barons 3 W 11 5 November 3, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 San Francisco Seals 1 T 12 2 November 6, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 7 Seattle Totems 3 W 14 6 November 7, 1965 Seattle Totems 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 W 16 7 November 10, 1965 Portland Buckaroos 6 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 L 2 November 13, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 Portland Buckaroos 2 W 18 8 November 17, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Los Angeles Blades 3 W 20 9 November 19, 1965 Vancouver Canucks 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 W 22 10 November 20, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Vancouver Canucks 2 W 24 11 November 23, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 9 Los Angeles Blades 5 W 26 12 November 26, 1965 San Francisco Seals 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 W 28 13 November 27, 1965 Los Angeles Blades 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 3 December 1, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 8 Springfield Indians 3 W 30 14 December 4, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Seattle Totems 2 W 32 15 December 5, 1965 Seattle Totems 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 W 34 16 December 11, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 Hershey Bears 2 W 36 17 December 12, 1965 Seattle Totems 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 L 4 December 14, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 Los Angeles Blades 1 W 38 18 December 17, 1965 San Francisco Seals 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L Overtime 5:41 5 December 18, 1965 San Francisco Seals 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 6 December 25, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 Seattle Totems 5 L 7 December 26, 1965 Portland Buckaroos 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 T 39 3 December 29, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 San Francisco Seals 5 L 8 January 1, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Vancouver Canucks 1 W 41 19 January 2, 1965 Vancouver Canucks 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 W 43 20 January 5, 1965 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 San Francisco Seals 1 W 45 21 January 6, 1966 Los Angeles Blades 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 W 47 22 January 7, 1966 San Francisco Seals 6 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 L 9 January 9, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 L 10 January 11, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 Portland Buckaroos 4 W 49 23 January 15, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 Providence Reds 1 W 51 24 January 19, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 Vancouver Canucks 2 W 53 Overtime 3:22 25 January 22, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 Los Angeles Blades 2 W 55 26 January 23, 1966 Vancouver Canucks 10 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 11 January 28, 1966 Seattle Totems 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 W 57 27 January 29, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Portland Buckaroos 2 W 59 28 January 30, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 12 February 2, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 San Francisco Seals 4 L 13 February 3, 1966 Los Angeles Blades 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 W 61 Overtime 6:54 29 February 5, 1966 Los Angeles Blades 7 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L 14 February 6, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 T 62 4 February 9, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 Portland Buckaroos 3 L Overtime 1:11 15 February 11, 1966 Vancouver Canucks 5 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 L 16 1 February 12, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 Los Angeles Blades 5 L 17 February 16, 1966 Los Angeles Blades 6 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 L 18 February 18, 1966 San Francisco Seals 2 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 19 February 23, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 Seattle Totems 3 L 20 February 26, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Rochester Americans 4 W 64 30 March 2, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 San Francisco Seals 2 W 66 31 March 4, 1966 Vancouver Canucks 8 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 21 March 5, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Seattle Totems 2 W 68 32 March 9, 1966 San Francisco Seals 7 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L 22 March 10, 1966 Los Angeles Blades 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 W 70 33 March 12, 1966 Pittsburgh Hornets 1 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 W 72 Overtime 4:52 34 March 13, 1966 Providence Reds 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 23 March 15, 1966 Baltimore Clippers 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 24 March 16, 1966 Hershey Bears 9 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 25 March 19, 1966 Springfield Indians 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 26 March 20, 1966 Quebec Aces 7 Victoria Maple Leafs 1 L 27 March 23, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Vancouver Canucks 2 W 74 35 March 26, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Portland Buckaroos 1 W 76 36 March 30, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Buffalo Bisons 2 W 78 37 April 2, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Seattle Totems 4 W 80 38 April 6, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 10 Los Angeles Blades 0 W 82 39 April 8, 1966 Seattle Totems 7 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 L 28 April 9, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Vancouver Canucks 5 W 84 40 TOTAL RECORD 39 28 4 FIRST ROUND PLAYOFFS - Won series 4-3 April 13, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 San Francisco Seals 3 W 1-0 April 16,1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 3 San Francisco Seals 1 W 2-0 April 18, 1966 San Francisco Seals 4 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L 2-1 April 20, 1966 San Francisco Seals 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L Overtime 2:29 April 22, 1966 San Francisco Seals 5 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 L 2-3 April 23, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 San Francisco Seals 4 W Overtime 12:37 April 26, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 San Francisco Seals 1 W 4-3 SECOND ROUND - PLAYOFFS - Won series 4-3 April 30, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 6 Portland Buckaroos 5 W Overtime 34:56 May 2, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 6 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L May 3, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 1 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 W May 6, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 0 Portland Buckaroos 3 L May 7, 1966 Victoria Maple Leafs 4 Portland Buckaroos 2 W May 9, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 3 Victoria Maple Leafs 2 L May 10, 1966 Portland Buckaroos 1 Victoria Maple Leafs 5 W Won series 4-3 WON LESTER PATRICK CUP FOR LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN HONOURED PAST... and Bright Future an HONOURED PAST
    2012 Induction Saturday, June 16, 2012 Convention Hall, Conexus Arts Centre, 200 Lakeshore Drive, Regina, Saskatchewan AN HONOURED PAST... and bright future AN HONOURED PAST... and bright future 2012 Induction Saturday, June 16, 2012 Convention Hall , Conexus Arts Centre, 200 Lakeshore Drive, Regina, Saskatchewan INDUCTION PROGRAM THE SASKATCHEWAN Master of Ceremonies: SPORTS HALL OF FAME Rod Pedersen 2011-12 Parade of Inductees BOARD OF DIRECTORS President: Hugh Vassos INDUCTION CEREMONY Vice President: Trent Fraser Treasurer: Reid Mossing Fiona Smith-Bell - Hockey Secretary: Scott Waters Don Clark - Wrestling Past President: Paul Spasoff Orland Kurtenbach - Hockey DIRECTORS: Darcey Busse - Volleyball Linda Burnham Judy Peddle - Athletics Steve Chisholm Donna Veale - Softball Jim Dundas Karin Lofstrom - Multi Sport Brooks Findlay Greg Indzeoski Vanessa Monar Enweani - Athletics Shirley Kowalski 2007 Saskatchewan Roughrider Football Team Scott MacQuarrie Michael Mintenko - Swimming Vance McNab Nomination Process Inductee Eligibility is as follows: ATHLETE: * Nominees must have represented sport with distinction in athletic competition; both in Saskatchewan and outside the province; or whose example has brought great credit to the sport and high respect for the individual; and whose conduct will not bring discredit to the SSHF. * Nominees must have compiled an outstanding record in one or more sports. * Nominees must be individuals with substantial connections to Saskatchewan. * Nominees do not have to be first recognized by a local satellite hall of fame, if available. * The Junior level of competition will be the minimum level of accomplishment considered for eligibility. * Regardless of age, if an individual competes in an open competition, a nomination will be considered. * Generally speaking, athletes will not be inducted for at least three (3) years after they have finished competing (retired).
    [Show full text]
  • Bremerton Ice Center Review (PDF)
    ______________________________________________________ CITY AUDITOR 345 6th Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 & Phone (360) 473-5369 November 6, 2020 To Audit Committee Members: Leslie Daugs, Audit Committee Chair and Council Member Deborah McDaniel, Audit Committee Vice-Chair and Citizen Member Mike Simpson, Council Member Darryl Riley, Citizen Member Dennis Treger, CPA Re: Bremerton Ice Center Concession Agreement History Review Dear Audit Committee Members: At your request and based on the information reviewed to date, I am submitting my findings regarding the Bremerton Ice Center Concession Agreement History Review. BACKGROUND - LAND ACQUISITION In April 1971, the United States Secretary of the Interior deeded 17.6 acres of land to the City for public park and recreation purposes. The conveyance prohibited the City from leasing the land except to another government agency, but allowed the City to provide recreational facilities and services by entering into private concession agreements, subject to approval by the Secretary of the Interior. Thirty years after the City acquired the land, the City entered into a concession agreement with Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc. (“BIA”) whereby the property would be developed for an indoor public ice rink. KITSAP ICE RINK HISTORY The first Kitsap County ice rink was the Ice Bowl, which opened in Gorst in October 1939. The Ice Bowl, built by Karl Mehner, was a 70 by 130 foot ice rink that hosted national touring ice carnivals, sponsored a hockey league, and was home to a figure skating club. In January 1943, the Ice Bowl roof collapsed in a blizzard under the weight of an estimated 500 tons of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Winter 1993 Number 2
    NORTHERN KENTUCKY LAW REVIEW Volume 20 Winter 1993 Number 2 Twentieth Anniversary Issue Special Feature: Antitrust Exceptions Foreword: Taking Exception to the Antitrust Laws .................... Charles J. Kubicki, Jr., and John H. Watson 241 The Perils of Judicial Legislation: The Establishment and Evolution of the Parker v. Brown Exemption to the Sherman Antitrust Act .............................. M. Shawn McMurray 249 The Sherman Act and the Arbitrary Power Section of the Kentucky Constitution as Applied to Kentucky Fair Trade Laws .......... Donald K. Kazee 297 Antitrust Law and Baseball Franchises: Leaving Your Heart (and the Giants) in San Francisco ......... Myron L. Dale and John Hunt 337 Health Care: Current Antitrust Issues .................................. M urray S. M onroe 365 ARTICLES Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake Insurance Co.: The Meaning of the Pollution Exclusion Established in Ohio .................... Joseph C. Gruber 391 State v. Solomon: The New Bases for Expert Testimony ....................... Lawrence A. Glassmann 407 Jurors Asking Questions: Revolutionary or Evolutionary? .... ... ...... ....... Judge Anthony Valen 423 Mandatory Arbitration Under ERISA: Pay Now, Dispute Later ................ Robert S. Marsel 441 Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Alternative for Resolving Employment Litigation and Disputes ........................ Michael W. Hawkins 493 SPECIAL COMMENT Selling Justice: Will Electronic Monitoring Last? ................J. Robert Lilly and Richard A. Ball 505 STUDENT ARTICLES State v. Wyant: The Demise of Ohio's Ethnic Intimidation Statute ................... Marla J. Merdinger 531 Cremeans v. Willmar Henderson Mfg. Co.: Must Manufacturers Become Involuntary Insurers of Their Products in Ohio's Employment Settings? ....................................... Terese M . Wells 551 Ohio Blows the Lid Off the Medical Malpractice Damage Cap: Morris v. Savoy ............. Lisa T. Meeks 571 DEDICATION FOR THE TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF LAW REVIEW by David A.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Years of Hockey in Seattle: from Metropolitans to Thunderbirds
    88 Years of Hockey in Seattle From Metroplitans to Thunderbirds The 1929-30 Seattle Eskimos were managed by Lloyd Turner (far left). BY JEFF OBERMEYER ne evening in January, 1911, Joe Patrick sat O down with his sons Lester and Frank at their home in Nelson, B.C. to discuss the Lester Patrick, left, and Frank Patrick, future of the family. Joe had pictured here from 1911, were the founders just sold his lumber business of the first professional hockey league on and was looking for a new ven- the Pacific Coast and were excellent hockey ture. Lester and Frank, both ex- players in their own right. cellent hockey players, sug- gested the family move to the west coast and start a professional hockey league – an incredibly bold idea at the time. Professional hockey was dominated by teams in Eastern Canada, and the small population of the Pacific Coast would make it hard to draw both fans and quality players. But Joe had faith in his sons, Rudy Filion played who had worked so hard for him in building his timber empire. 14 seasons in Seattle The decision was made and a month later the family moved between 1948 and 1963. to Victoria, B.C. By the following January the first Pacific A very skilled player Coast Hockey Association (PCHA) season was under- offensively, Filion was also way with teams in Vancouver, Victoria, and New known for his gentlemanly play in Westminster. the notorious rough minor leagues of the era. Photos courtesy Jeff Obermeyer www.NostalgiaMagazine.us January 2004 ! 3 The Seattle Eskimos and their opponents are ready to start a game in the Civic Arena, circa 1930.
    [Show full text]
  • Franchise Record Book
    FRANCHISE RECORD BOOK All-Time WHL Franchise Record: (1961-1967) 424 games - 200 wins - 202 losses - 22 ties - 422 points - .498 winning percentage Home record: 212 games – 131 wins – 74 losses – 7 ties – .634 winning percentage Away record: 212 games – 69 wins – 128 losses – 15 ties – .361 winning percentage All-Time NHL Franchise Record: (1967-1978) 858 games - 229 wins - 488 losses - 141 ties - 599 points - .349 winning percentage Home record: 429 games - 156 wins - 180 losses - 93 ties - 405 points - .472 winning percentage Away record: 429 games - 73 wins - 308 losses - 48 ties - 194 points - .226 winning percentage All-Time NHL Franchise Record as: California Seals (1967): 25 games - 6 wins - 14 losses - 5 ties - 17 points - .340 winning percentage Home record: 12 games - 5 wins - 3 losses - 4 ties - 14 points - .583 winning percentage Away record: 13 games - 1 win - 11 losses - 1 tie - 3 points - .115 winning percentage Oakland Seals (1967-1970): 203 games - 60 wins - 106 losses - 37 ties - 157 points - .387 winning percentage Home record: 101 games - 39 wins - 43 losses - 19 ties - 97 points - .480 winning percentage Away record: 102 games - 21 wins - 63 losses - 18 ties - 60 points - .294 winning percentage California Golden Seals (1970-1976): 470 games - 116 wins - 281 losses - 73 ties - 305 points - .324 winning percentage Home record: 236 games - 84 wins - 100 losses - 52 ties - 220 points - .466 winning percentage Away record: 234 games - 32 wins - 181 losses - 21 ties - 85 points - .182 winning percentage Cleveland Barons
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of HOCKEY in SEATTLE Dec
    HISTORY OF HOCKEY IN SEATTLE Dec. 4, 2018 PLAYERS BORN IN WASHINGTON STATE, NHL HISTORY * To date, 14 players born in Washington state have played at least one NHL game (all skaters, no goaltenders). * Five of those players have appeared in a game during the 2018-19 season: Dylan Gambrell (Bonney Lake), Tyler Johnson (Spokane), T.J. Oshie (Everett), Derek Ryan (Spokane) and Kailer Yamamoto (Spokane). * Tom Bissett is the only one of the 14 players born in the city of Seattle. The other birthplaces: Spokane (7), Aberdeen, Bonney Lake, Ellensburg, Everett, Richland and Tacoma. SEATTLE-AREA YOUTH HOCKEY PARTICIPATION 2017-18 • Youth players (all genders, ages 18 and under): 1,744 • Girls players (ages 18 and under): 355 • Total players (all ages): 4,405 2013-14 • Youth players (all genders, ages 18 and under): 1,301 • Girls players (ages 18 and under): 156 • Total players (all ages): 3,519 2008-09 • Youth players (all genders, ages 18 and under): 1,179 • Girls players (ages 18 and under): 121 • Total players (all ages): 3,024 SEATTLE HOCKEY HISTORY BRIEF Seattle Metropolitans, 1915-16 to 1923-24 1915-16: The Seattle Metropolitans join the Pacific Coast Hockey Association (PCHA), becoming the second U.S.-based team eligible to win the Stanley Cup. (The Portland Rosebuds had become the first the previous season when they relocated from New Westminster). 1916-17: The Metropolitans capture the PCHA championship and meet the NHL-champion Montreal Canadiens, who travel west, in the best-of-five Stanley Cup Final. Seattle wins, 3-1, becoming the first U.S.-based team to claim the title.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Points
    TURNING POINTS Ten Landmark Moments That Defined California’s Seals BY STEVE CURRIER he franchise best known as the California against the Seattle Totems, the Seals faced another 3–1 Golden Seals existed from 1961 to 1978, in various deficit, even though the entire series was played at the Tleagues, under different names and in numerous Cow Palace in San Francisco due to a scheduling con- locations. Its first five years were spent in the minor-pro flict in Seattle. The Seals rallied to win the next two con- Western Hockey League (whl) as the San Francisco tests and force a climactic seventh game. Seals. In 1966, the club was purchased by a group led by Before a league-record crowd of 12,404, the Seals fell Barry van Gerbig, relocated to Oakland and renamed behind 2–0 in the second period, but San Francisco’s the California Seals; it later became one of the nhl’s 1967 Duke Edmundson and Moe Mantha drew the two teams expansion franchises. After an early, lukewarm recep- even before the period-ending buzzer sounded. Danny tion from Oakland fans, the team was rechristened the Belisle then put the Seals up 3–2 at 5:09 of the third, but Oakland Seals in December 1967. When Charles O. Fin - Seattle’s Jim Powers tied it up just a minute later, forcing ley purchased the struggling franchise in 1970, he overtime for the fourth time in the series. decided, two games into the new season, to rename the Throughout the overtime period, it sounded as though team the California Golden Seals, which is the name that fans were stomping their feet or pounding their fists on stuck until the team moved to Cleveland in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • U Book Store Will Need More Space, Soy Reports Repeal Drive Aimed At
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON C23 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 1968 No. 53 Repeal Drive Aimed At Amendment By DAN PEDEKSEN press of BOC executive se-sions, and financing and policy of the A decision is expected fiom athletic department, whicii was tho Board of Control this after­ then managed by the ASUW. noon on whether there will IM» a general meeting of the The new constitution limited ASUW corporation to consider .ASl'W power to ai'tivities only, repeal of a 12-year-old amend­ discontinuing student voting ment to the ASUW constitu­ membership on the I'niversity'* tion. Budget and I'inance Commit­ tee, and abolishing the ASCW A bill asking f(n- the nwefing Building Operations C'onnidt* has been introduced hy .Mike tee. -Mandeville for Bob t'ooper- Within a week the Board rider. president of Students of Control had \oted in a spe­ f(»r Campus Keform (S('K). cial meeting not to recognize The disputed amendment, Ar- the new constitution. ASUW tiiie IX, gives the l"ni\erstty and University attorneys then oto by stepfijnie ros president authorify to exercise final .say over any ASl W deci­ took up the legal dispute, and One of these i\\c coeds will be named queen of the Winter Carnival, sponsored by Husky sion. It reads: on Oct. 6. 195.5, the Univer­ Wint«i Sports Club. '1 he five are, from left, Alice Stithen, Barb Williams, Hjordis Fammer- sity attorney presented a "Tlie President of the Uni­ compromise to the BOC. It stacJ, Linda Lazzar and Ann Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • 0131-PT-A Section.Indd
    Team founder YOUR ONLINE LOCAL Harry Glickman New world view TRAIL BLAZER refl ects on his DAILY NEWS Portland International Film NBA career Festival adds a little love www.portlandtribune.com PortlandSee SPORTS, B8 Tribune— See LIFE, B1 THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2013 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILY PAPER • PUBLISHED THURSDAY Cluster ■ Developments on Columbia River levee now deemed safety concerns plan ties parents in knots Many worry changes would water down Chief Joseph success By JENNIFER ANDERSON The Tribune The story time rug in Er- in Quinton’s classroom isn’t big enough to hold all of her students. Some of her 31 second-grad- ers spill onto the bare fl oor or sit in desk chairs behind the group. That’s about six or seven more than what Quinton — a teacher of six years at North Portland’s Chief Joseph Elemen- tary School — considers ideal. “So much is behavior man- agement,” says Quinton, whose teaching career began in Cali- otorists, bicyclists and jog- towers and miles of utility lines. fornia about 30 years ago. With gers enjoying Columbia “Everything’s changed since Ka- 31 students, River views along Marine trina,” says Dave Hendricks, director “we don’t have MDrive may not realize it, of special projects for Multnomah the materials; Levee holds but they’re traveling atop a mound of County Drainage District No. 1. “We want we don’t have sand that’s the main bulwark against “All this stuff is no longer accept- to be part the time. ... I massive fl ooding of North and North- able,” he says, unless engineers can of the don’t dive into east Portland.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattlespectatoruniversity
    Seattle nivU ersity ScholarWorks @ SeattleU The peS ctator 2-7-1968 Spectator 1968-02-07 Editors of The pS ectator Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator Recommended Citation Editors of The peS ctator, "Spectator 1968-02-07" (1968). The Spectator. 1081. http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator/1081 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The peS ctator by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. Education Major HonoredbyAWS The president of Gamma Sig- ma Phi, Bernie Clayton, was spectator January the chosen woman of month. Bernie, a senior educa- tion major, is from Seattle. She SEATTLE UNIVERSITY.7, <<^°'° 27 XXXVI Seattle, Washington, Wednesday, February 1968 No. has been on the honor roll for the past four years and is a memberof various campus hon- Inter-Dorm Action: oraries. She was selected for the hon- or by the AWS, on the basis of her exemplary dignity, intelli- Judiciary Board Formed gence and cooperation. The her a taking the first steps to rectify AWS officers described as By KERRY WEBSTER and responsible uni- the situation." dedicated Inter-Dorm Council President versity coed. Mahoney that he was Bernie is a member of the fol- Leon announced the MAHONEYadded lowing honoraries: Gamma Pi of an inter-dorm ju- "appalledand disappointed that formation not point Epsilon,Kappa Delta Pi, Silver diciary board and the adoption The Spectator did out that only a very small percent- Scroll, is an S.U. Merit Scholar of a set of anti-disturbance reg- Who in Ameri- a age of Campion residents took and is in Who's ulations carrying stiff fines at can Colleges and Universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Season Standings
    Appendix A - Season Standings 1915-75 1915-16 PCHA GP W L T GF GA 1923-24 PCHA GP W L T GF GA * Portland Rosebuds 18 13 5 0 71 50 Seattle Metropolitans 30 14 16 0 84 99 Vancouver Millionaires 18 9 9 0 75 69 *Vancouver Millionaires 30 13 16 1 87 80 Seattle Metropolitans 18 9 9 0 68 67 Victoria Cougars 30 11 18 1 78 103 Victoria Aristocrats 18 5 13 0 74 102 1928-29 PCHA GP W L T GF GA 1916-17 PCHA GP W L T GF GA *Vancouver Lions 36 25 8 3 87 54 * Seattle Metropolitans 24 16 8 0 125 80 Seattle Eskimos 36 17 17 2 75 76 Vancouver Millionaires 23 14 9 0 131 124 Portland Buckaroos 36 14 17 5 64 72 Portland Rosebuds 24 9 15 0 114 112 Victoria Cubs 36 8 22 6 68 91 Spokane Canaries 23 8 15 0 89 143 1929-30 PCHL GP W L T GF GA 1917-18 PCHA GP W L T GF GA *Vancouver Lions 36 20 8 8 86 46 Seattle Metropolitans 18 11 7 0 67 65 Portland Buckaroos 36 20 10 6 64 34 *Vancouver Millionaires 18 9 9 0 70 60 Seattle Eskimos 36 15 13 8 77 58 Portland Rosebuds 18 7 11 0 63 75 Victoria Cubs 36 5 29 2 43 132 1918-19 PCHA GP W L T GF GA 1930-31 PCHL GP W L T GF GA Vancouver Millionaires 20 12 8 0 72 55 Seattle Eskimos 34 16 9 9 64 51 *Seattle Metropolitans 20 11 9 0 66 46 *Vancouver Lions 35 14 13 8 61 61 Victoria Aristocrats 20 7 13 0 44 81 Portland Buckaroos 35 12 15 8 60 61 Tacoma Tigers 10 2 7 1 12 24 1919-20 PCHA GP W L T GF GA *Seattle Metropolitans 22 12 10 0 59 55 1933-34 NWHL GP W L T GF GA Vancouver Millionaires 22 11 11 0 75 65 *Calgary Tigers 34 17 11 6 117 76 Victoria Aristocrats 22 10 12 0 57 71 Edmonton Eskimos 34 18 12 4 98 91 Vancouver Lions 34
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Rationale for the Expansion of Professional Sports Leagues
    The Antitrust Rationale for the Expansion of Professional Sports Leagues THOMAS A. PMAINO, JR.* I. ANTITRUST AS A REMEDY FOR SPORTS LEAGUES' REFUSAL TO EXPAND Professional sports leagues are one of the last refuges of unchallenged monopoly power in America. Most monopolies have been forbidden by regulation or judicial decree from abusing their market power.1 However, Major League Baseball, the National Football League ("NFL"), the National Basketball Association ("NBA"), and the National Hockey League ("NHL") have each been able to acquire, maintain, and exercise their monopoly power with little judicial or regulatory oversight. Although the courts have allowed antitrust challenges to certain aspects of league behavior (such as restrictions on the free movement of players or franchises), 2 they have not directly challenged the means by which the owners of professional sports teams achieve their monopoly profits. The owners have successfully conspired to keep the number of franchises substantially below that which would exist in a free market. They have enforced this conspiracy through super majority voting requirements in the leagues' bylaws which have prevented the leagues from expanding to meet the demand from cities capable of supporting professional sports franchises. 3 The resulting artificial scarcity of franchises has given owners the leverage to force 4 fans and taxpayers to provide them with billions of dollars in subsidies. * Vice-President, Law, Parker-Hannifin Corporation; J.D. 1974, Cornell Law School; B.A., 1971, Allegheny College. The opinions expressed in this Article are personal to the author and do not reflect the opinions of Parker-Hannifin Corporation. The author would like to thank Jon J.
    [Show full text]