Economic Espionage to Protect Their Trade Secrets? 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Espionage to Protect Their Trade Secrets? 4 Commonly Asked Questions Methods for Department of Justice Economic Protection Does the 1996 EEA apply if the offender is a Federal Bureau of Investigation Q foreign person? 1. Recognize the threat. Yes. The Act applies to whoever knowingly performs targeting or 2. Identify and value trade secrets. A acquisition of trade secrets. Territorial limits will apply for prosecution. 3. Implement a definable plan for safeguarding trade secrets. Does the act help victims of Economic Espionage to protect their trade secrets? 4. Secure physical trade secrets and limit Q Yes. The Act contains a special access to trade secrets. provision to protect the disclosure of 5. Provide ongoing security training to A trade secret information during the employees. criminal justice process. 6. Develop an insider threat program. Are there other statutes that can apply if trade secrets are not protected and therefore cannot 7. Proactively report suspicious Q be prosecuted under the Act? incidents to the FBI before your Yes. The following is a list of proprietary information is irreversibly violations that may apply: Mail Fraud, A Wire Fraud, Computer Fraud and compromised. Abuse, Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property, and various Export Control and Intellectual Property Rights statutes. Contact your local FBI field office for further assistance. Is the FBI proactive in its approach to Q economic espionage? Yes. The FBI Director has designated espionage as the FBI’s number two A priority - second only to terrorism. The Economic Espionage Unit is dedicated to countering the economic espionage threat to include developing training and outreach materials; participating in conferences; visiting private industry; Economic working with the law enforcement and intelligence community on requirement issues; and providing classified and unclassified presentations. “...economic espionage and theft of Espionage trade secrets are increasingly linked to the insider threat and the growing To report violations, obtain additional Protecting America’s threat of cyber espionage.” information, or schedule a briefing FBI Congressional Testimony regarding Economic Espionage, Trade Secrets contact your local field office at: www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field. What are Economic Espionage Act of 1996 Provisions The FBI seeks trade your help in secrets? TERRITORIAL LIMITS Trade secrets EEA protects against theft that occurs either (1) in the safeguarding are all forms and United States, or (2) outside of the United States and (a) an types of financial, act in furtherance of the offense must have been committed our nation’s business, scientific, in the United States or (b) the violator is a US person or technical, economic organization. secrets! or engineering information, CRIMINAL PENALTIES including patterns, Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1831 Economic Espionage Our Nation’s secrets are in jeopardy, the same secrets plans, compilations, that make your company profitable. The FBI estimates program devices, • Foreign Government Beneficiary billions of US dollars are lost to foreign competitors formulas, • Maximum Individual Sentence/Fine: 15 years every year. These foreign competitors deliberately target designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, imprisonment/$5 million. economic intelligence in advanced technologies and procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or • Maximum Organizational Fine: Not more than the flourishing US industries. intangible, and whether or how stored, complied, or greater of $10 million or 3 times the value of the stolen memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, trade secret. Foreign competitors operate under three categories to photographically or in writing, (1) which the owner has create an elaborate network of spies: taken reasonable measures to protect; and (2) which Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1832 Theft of Trade Secrets have an independent economic value from not being 1. Aggressively target present and former foreign generally known to the public. • Beneficiary must be anyone other than the owner of the nationals working for US companies and research misappropriated trade secret(s) institutions; Commonly referred to as proprietary information, • Maximum Individual Sentence/Fine: 10 years 2. Recruit and perform technical operations to include economic policy information, trade information, imprisonment/$250,000 or an alternative fine based on bribery, discreet theft, dumpster diving (in search of proprietary technology, or critical technology. gain/loss figures. discarded trade secrets) and wiretapping; and, 3. Establish seemingly innocent business relationships What are some methods of • Maximum Organizational Fine: $5 million between foreign companies and US industries to gather economic intelligence including proprietary targeting or acquiring trade information. secrets? 1. Steal, conceal, or carry away by fraud, artifice, or In an effort to safeguard our nation’s economic secrets, deception; the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) was signed into 2. Copy, duplicate, sketch, draw, photograph, law on October 11, 1996. download, upload, alter, destroy, photocopy, replicate, transmit, deliver, send, mail, What is Economic Espionage communicate, or convey; and, 3. Receive, buy, or possess a trade secret, knowing Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1831? the same to have been stolen or appropriated, Economic Espionage is (1) whoever knowingly performs obtained, or converted without authorization. targeting or acquisition of trade secrets to (2) knowingly Criminal Forfeiture benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, Who is a foreign agent and what The court may order the violator to forfeit to the United or foreign agent. is a foreign instrumentality? States any (1) property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the What is theft of trade secrets A Foreign Agent is any officer, employee, proxy, servant, result of the violation, or (2) property used, or intended to delegate, or representative of a foreign government. The be used, in any manner or part, to commit or facilitate the Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1832? EEA defines a Foreign Instrumentality as: commission of the violation. Theft of trade secrets is (1) whoever knowingly performs Any agency, bureau, ministry, component, institution, targeting or acquisition of trade secrets or intends to Civil Proceedings association or any legal, commercial or business convert a trade secret to (2) knowingly benefit anyone In a civil action, the Attorney General may obtain organization, corporation, firm, or entity that other than the owner. Commonly referred to as Industrial appropriate injunctive relief to prevent the offense. The is substantially owned, controlled, sponsored, Espionage. District Courts of the United States have exclusive original commanded, managed, or dominated by a foreign government. jurisdiction of civil actions..
Recommended publications
  • The Spies That Founded America: How the War for Independence Revolutionized American Espionage
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2020 Apr 27th, 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM The Spies that Founded America: How the War for Independence Revolutionized American Espionage Masaki Lew Clackamas High School Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the History Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Lew, Masaki, "The Spies that Founded America: How the War for Independence Revolutionized American Espionage" (2020). Young Historians Conference. 19. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2020/papers/19 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Spies that Founded America: How the War for Independence Revolutionized American Espionage Masaki Lew Humanities Western Civilization 102 March 16, 2020 1 Continental Spy Nathan Hale, standing below the gallows, spoke to his British captors with nothing less than unequivocal patriotism: “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.”1 American History idolizes Hale as a hero. His bravery as the first pioneer of American espionage willing to sacrifice his life for the growing colonial sentiment against a daunting global empire vindicates this. Yet, behind Hale’s success as an operative on
    [Show full text]
  • Steganography- a Data Hiding Technique
    International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 9– No.7, November 2010 Steganography- A Data Hiding Technique Arvind Kumar Km. Pooja Assistant Professor Vankateshwara institute of computer Vidya College of engineering, Meerut, India Science and technology, Meerut, India ABSTRACT In steganography, the possible cover carriers are innocent looking Steganography is the art of hiding information and an effort to carriers (images, audio, video, text, or some other digitally conceal the existence of the embedded information. It serves as a representative code) which will hold the hidden information. A better way of securing message than cryptography which only message is the information hidden and may be plaintext, cipher text, conceals the content of the message not the existence of the message. images, or anything that can be embedded into a bit stream. Together Original message is being hidden within a carrier such that the the cover carrier and the embedded message create a stego-carrier. changes so occurred in the carrier are not observable. In this paper we Hiding information may require a stego key which is additional secret will discuss how digital images can be used as a carrier to hide information, such as a password, required for embedding the messages. This paper also analyses the performance of some of the information. For example, when a secret message is hidden within a steganography tools. Steganography is a useful tool that allows covert cover image, the resulting product is a stego-image. transmission of information over an over the communications A possible formula of the process may be represented as: cover channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographyelizabethbentley.Pdf
    Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet 1 of 284 QUEEN RED SPY Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet 2 of 284 3 of 284 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet RED SPY QUEEN A Biography of ELIZABETH BENTLEY Kathryn S.Olmsted The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill and London Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 4 of 284 © 2002 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet The University of North Carolina Press All rights reserved Set in Charter, Champion, and Justlefthand types by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Manufactured in the United States of America The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Olmsted, Kathryn S. Red spy queen : a biography of Elizabeth Bentley / by Kathryn S. Olmsted. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-8078-2739-8 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Bentley, Elizabeth. 2. Women communists—United States—Biography. 3. Communism—United States— 1917– 4. Intelligence service—Soviet Union. 5. Espionage—Soviet Union. 6. Informers—United States—Biography. I. Title. hx84.b384 o45 2002 327.1247073'092—dc21 2002002824 0605040302 54321 Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 5 of 284 To 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet my mother, Joane, and the memory of my father, Alvin Olmsted Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 Tseng 2003.10.24 14:06 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet 6 of 284 7 of 284 Contents Preface ix 6655 Olmsted / RED SPY QUEEN / sheet Acknowledgments xiii Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley Deeks*
    ARTICLE An International Legal Framework for Surveillance ASHLEY DEEKS* Edward Snowden’s leaks laid bare the scope and breadth of the electronic surveillance that the U.S. National Security Agency and its foreign counterparts conduct. Suddenly, foreign surveillance is understood as personal and pervasive, capturing the communications not only of foreign leaders but also of private citizens. Yet to the chagrin of many state leaders, academics, and foreign citizens, international law has had little to say about foreign surveillance. Until recently, no court, treaty body, or government had suggested that international law, including basic privacy protections in human rights treaties, applied to purely foreign intelligence collection. This is now changing: Several UN bodies, judicial tribunals, U.S. corporations, and individuals subject to foreign surveillance are pressuring states to bring that surveillance under tighter legal control. This Article tackles three key, interrelated puzzles associated with this sudden transformation. First, it explores why international law has had so little to say about how, when, and where governments may spy on other states’ nationals. Second, it draws on international relations theory to argue that the development of new international norms regarding surveillance is both likely and essential. Third, it identifies six process-driven norms that states can and should adopt to ensure meaningful privacy restrictions on international surveillance without unduly harming their legitimate national security interests. These norms, which include limits on the use of collected data, periodic reviews of surveillance authorizations, and active oversight by neutral bodies, will increase the transparency, accountability, and legitimacy of foreign surveillance. This procedural approach challenges the limited emerging scholarship on surveillance, which urges states to apply existing — but vague and contested — substantive human rights norms to complicated, clandestine practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinas Non-Traditional Espionage Against the United States, The
    STATEMENT OF JOHN C. DEMERS ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE FOR A HEARING ON CHINA’S NON-TRADITIONAL ESPIONAGE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES: THE THREAT AND POTENTIAL POLICY RESPONSES PRESENTED ON DECEMBER 12, 2018 Statement of John C. Demers Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division U.S. Department of Justice Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate December 12, 2018 Good morning Chairman Grassley, Ranking Member Feinstein, and distinguished Members of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of the Department of Justice (Department) concerning China’s economic aggression, its efforts to threaten our national security on several, non-traditional fronts, and our efforts to combat them. The Department views this threat as a priority, and last month the former Attorney General announced an initiative to marshal our resources to better address it. This initiative continues, and I am privileged to lead this effort on behalf of the Department. I especially appreciate the Committee’s interest in this area of growing concern. I will begin by framing China’s strategic goals, including its stated goal of achieving superiority in certain industries, which, not coincidentally, corresponds to thefts of technology from U.S. companies in those industries. I will then describe some of the unacceptable methods by which China is pursuing (or could pursue) those goals at our expense. Finally, I will explain what the Department is doing about it, including through our China Initiative. I. China’s Strategic Goals Official publications of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party set out China’s ambitious technology-related industrial policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001
    Technical Report 02-5 July 2002 Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 Katherine L. Herbig Martin F. Wiskoff TRW Systems Released by James A. Riedel Director Defense Personnel Security Research Center 99 Pacific Street, Building 455-E Monterey, CA 93940-2497 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704- 0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DDMMYYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From – To) July 2002 Technical 1947 - 2001 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Katherine L. Herbig, Ph.D. Martin F. Wiskoff, Ph.D. 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Steganography: Forensic, Security, and Legal Issues
    Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law Volume 3 Number 2 Article 2 2008 Steganography: Forensic, Security, and Legal Issues Merrill Warkentin Mississippi State University Ernst Bekkering Northeastern State University Mark B. Schmidt St. Cloud State University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl Part of the Computer Engineering Commons, Computer Law Commons, Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons, Forensic Science and Technology Commons, and the Information Security Commons Recommended Citation Warkentin, Merrill; Bekkering, Ernst; and Schmidt, Mark B. (2008) "Steganography: Forensic, Security, and Legal Issues," Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law: Vol. 3 : No. 2 , Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2008.1039 Available at: https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol3/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law by an authorized administrator of (c)ADFSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, Vol. 3(2) Steganography: Forensic, Security, and Legal Issues Merrill Warkentin Mississippi State University [email protected] Ernst Bekkering Northeastern State University [email protected] Mark B. Schmidt St. Cloud State University [email protected] ABSTRACT Steganography has long been regarded as a tool used for illicit and destructive purposes such as crime and warfare. Currently, digital tools are widely available to ordinary computer users also. Steganography software allows both illicit and legitimate users to hide messages so that they will not be detected in transit.
    [Show full text]
  • NSA) Surveillance Programmes (PRISM) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Activities and Their Impact on EU Citizens' Fundamental Rights
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS The US National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programmes (PRISM) and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) activities and their impact on EU citizens' fundamental rights NOTE Abstract In light of the recent PRISM-related revelations, this briefing note analyzes the impact of US surveillance programmes on European citizens’ rights. The note explores the scope of surveillance that can be carried out under the US FISA Amendment Act 2008, and related practices of the US authorities which have very strong implications for EU data sovereignty and the protection of European citizens’ rights. PE xxx.xxx EN AUTHOR(S) Mr Caspar BOWDEN (Independent Privacy Researcher) Introduction by Prof. Didier BIGO (King’s College London / Director of the Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité – CCLS, Paris, France). Copy-Editing: Dr. Amandine SCHERRER (Centre d’Etudes sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité – CCLS, Paris, France) Bibliographical assistance : Wendy Grossman RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Alessandro DAVOLI Policy Department Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in MMMMM 200X. Brussels, © European Parliament, 200X. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. INTRODUCTION ALDRICH HAZEN AMES Is 52 Years
    1. INTRODUCTION ALDRICH HAZEN AMES is 52 years old, born on May 26, 1941. In June 1962, ALDRICH HAZEN AMES accepted employment with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States, and he has been a full-time CIA employee for more than 31 years. At the time of his arrest, AMES was a GS-14 Operations Officer in the Counternarcotics Center at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia. During his employment with CIA, AMES held a variety of positions including the following: from 1983 to 1985, AMES was the Chief, Soviet Operational Review Branch in the Operational Review and Production Group of the Soviet/East European (SE) Division of the Directorate of Operations (DO) of the CIA; from 1986 through 1989, AMES was assigned to the United States Embassy in Rome, Italy; from September 1989 through December 1989, AMES was Chief, Europe Branch, External Operations Group, SE Division; from December 1989 through August 1990. AMES was the Chief, Czechoslovak Operations Branch, East European Operations Group, SE Division; from September 1990 through August 1991, AMES was assigned to the USSR Branch, Analytical Group. Counterintelligence Center; from September 1991 through November 1991, AMES was Chief, KGB. ' Working Group, Central Eurasia (CE) Division; from December 19091 through August 1993, AMES was a referant for CE Branch, regional Programs Branch, International Counternarcotics Group, Counternarcotics Center 0CG/CNC) and from August 1993 to February 1994, AMES was Chief, Europe and CE Branch, ICG/ CNC. Throughout AMES' employment with the CIA, he held a TOP SECRET security clearance and had regular access to information and documents classified SECRET and TOP SECRET pursuant to Executive Order 12356.
    [Show full text]
  • Spy Lingo — a Secret Eye
    A Secret Eye SpyLingo A Compendium Of Terms Used In The Intelligence Trade — July 2019 — A Secret Eye . blog PUBLISHER'S NOTICE: Although the authors and publisher have made every eort to ensure that the information in this book was correct at press time, the authors and publisher do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, TEXTUAL CONTENT: Textual Content can be reproduced for all non-commercial accident, or any other cause. purposes as long as you provide attribution to the author / and original source where available. CONSUMER NOTICE: You should assume that the author of this document has an aliate relationship and/or another material connection to the providers of goods and services mentioned in this report THIRD PARTY COPYRIGHT: and may be compensated when you purchase from a To the extent that copyright subsists in a third party it provider. remains with the original owner. Content compiled and adapted by: Vincent Hardy & J-F Bouchard © Copyright 9218-0082 Qc Inc July 2019 — Spy Lingo — A Secret Eye Table Of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 ALPHA 5 Ab - Ai 5 Al - As 6 Au - Av 7 Bravo 8 Ba - Bl 8 Bl - Bre 9 Bri - Bu 10 CHARLIE 11 C3 - Can 11 Car - Chi 12 Cho - Cl 13 Cn - Com 14 Comp - Cou 15 Cov 16 Cu 17 DELTA 18 Da - De 18 De - Di 19 Di - Dru 20 Dry - Dz 21 Echo 22 Ea - Ex 22 Ey 23 FOXTROT 24 Fa - Fi 24 Fl - For 25 Fou - Fu 26 GOLF 27 Ga - Go 27 Gr - Gu 28 HOTEL 29 Ha - Hoo 29 Hou - Hv 30 INDIA 31 Ia
    [Show full text]
  • A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage April Pickens James Madison University
    James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 4 | Issue 1 2016-2017 A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage April Pickens James Madison University Follow this and other works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj Recommended Chicago Citation Pickens, April. “A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage". James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal 4, no. 1 (2017): 56-64, accessed Month day, year. http:// commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj/vol4/iss1/5. This full issue is brought to you for free and open access by JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JMURJ Popular opinion and many historians portray the effects of Soviet espionage on the ABSTRACT United States as disastrous. Although covert Soviet efforts undeniably harmed America, their extent and gravity has been greatly exaggerated. This paper evaluates primary and secondary sources on the subject to strike a delicate balance between minimizing and inflating the effects of Soviet activities. It acknowledges that espionage did some damage, but questions the legal status, extent, and effect of much of the Soviets’ “stolen” information, ultimately arguing that most Soviet espionage was actually more harmful to the Soviet Union than to the United States. RUSSIAN COLONEL IS INDICTED Any argument downplaying covert Soviet endeavors HERE AS TOP SPY IN U.S.1 must begin with an admission that some espionage unquestionably led to detrimental consequences for CHIEF ‘RUSSIAN SPY’ the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the FBI's Performance in Deterring, Detecting, and Investigating the Espionage Activities of Robert Philip Hanssen
    U.S.DepartmentofJustice OfficeoftheInspectorGeneral UNCLASSIFIEDEXECUTIVESUMMARY AReviewoftheFBI’sPerformance inDeterring,Detecting,and InvestigatingtheEspionageActivities ofRobertPhilipHanssen OfficeoftheInspectorGeneral August2003 UNCLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Introduction In this report, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Justice (DOJ) examines the performance of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in deterring, detecting, and investigating the espionage of Robert Philip Hanssen, a former FBI Supervisory Special Agent. Hanssen's espionage began in November 1979 − three years after he joined the FBI − and continued intermittently until his arrest in February 2001, just two months before his mandatory retirement date. In addition to its management responsibility to detect espionage among its employees, the FBI is the lead agency for detecting and investigating espionage committed in the United States. Hanssen became an FBI agent in 1976. During his 25-year FBI career, he principally served in Soviet counterintelligence assignments in New York City and Washington, D.C. In the 1980s and 1990s, Hanssen held positions at FBI Headquarters and the State Department that gave him access to a broad range of highly sensitive counterintelligence and military information. On February 18, 2001, after a three-month investigation of Hanssen, he was arrested and charged with committing espionage on behalf of the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti, the intelligence service of the former Soviet Union) and its successors. On July 6, 2001, Hanssen pled guilty to espionage charges pursuant to a plea agreement in which he agreed to cooperate with the U.S. government and submit to debriefings. On May 10, 2002, Hanssen was sentenced to life imprisonment. Hanssen's espionage spanned three separate time periods: 1979-81, 1985-91, and 1999-2001.
    [Show full text]