Nacton Bucklesham Levington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1. Parish: Felixstowe
1. Parish: Felixstowe Meaning: St. Felix’s place (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Colneis Deanery: Colneya Union: Woodbridge RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Felixstowe & Walton UD (1894-1914), Felixstowe UD (1914-1974), Suffolk Coastal DC (1974- ) Other administrative details: Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division and County court District 3. Area: 1,921 acres land, 11 acres water, 374 acres of tidal water, 132 acres foreshore (1912) 4. Soils: Urbanized area. Dune sand and marine shingle around Old Felixstowe. 5. Types of farming: Mainly urbanized development. Some scattered farms – main crops (1937) wheat, barley and peas. 6. Enclosure: 7. Settlement: Large coastal town development on main Ipswich road. Some scattered farms (1972). Inhabited houses: 1674 – 34, 1801 – 41, 1851 – 117, 1871 – 143, 1901 – 525, 1951 – 4,568 (includes Walton), 1981 – 8,035 8. Communications: Road: Main Ipswich Road 1912 Carriers to Ipswich daily Rail: 1891 Felixstowe station opened (1877), new station built (1898) Pier Trams opened (1904), closed (1939) 1 Water: 1886 up to the present – Felixstowe docks, port and ferry Air: 1913 Air station commissioned, closed (1962), occupied by army. 9. Population: 1086 — 72 recorded 1327 — 47 taxpayers paid £5. 16s. 7¼d. (includes Walton) 1524 — 59 taxpayers paid £5. 18s. 10d. 1603 — 225 adults (includes Walton) 1674 — 40 households 1676 — Not recorded 1801 — 259 inhabitants 1831 — 363 inhabitants 1851 — 691 inhabitants 1871 — 760 inhabitants 1901 — 2,720 inhabitants 1931 — 12,067 inhabitants (includes Walton) 1951 — 15,081 inhabitants (includes Walton) 1971 — 18,750 inhabitants (includes Walton) 1981 — 20,893 inhabitants (includes Walton) 10. Benefice: Vicarage 1254 Valued £13. 6s. 8d. 1291 Valued £13. -
Sizewell C Stage 3 Town and Parish Event 22 January 2018 Key Issue Design
Sizewell C Stage 3 Town and Parish Event 22 January 2018 Key Issue Design Town/parish Comments from Table 1 Leiston cum Sizewell Town Pylons that have been added in this consultation are of a concern Council. from a visual basis. There should be no pylons. Design of the causeway for the beach landing stage and access to and along the beach when operational. Relocation of B car park is a concern along with Gabbard works and interconnectors, how will the C works impact be assessed in conjunction. Sandy colour of buildings preferred. Reduction in height of office blocks is good but location of training centre queried. General site layout queried on how it will work going forward, concern that too much is being built on the site footprint and that footprint is encroaching on the beach. 400 caravan spaces is of a concern. Comments from Table 2 Aldringham Parish Council Should be pressing exemplar design for AONB. Rendlesham Parish Council Nuclear regulator is driven by safety not interested in safety. Chillesford Parish meeting Report dismisses underground cables. Aldringham Parish Council Detrimental effect on the wildlife – AONB RSPB. Aldeburgh Town Council Generic design – hasn’t been designed for an AONB. Suffolk County Council Is Hinkley being built with pylons? Aldeburgh Town Council They’re not allowed to clad it or paint it. Aldringham Parish Council Sizewell B is an iconic building and looks good. This must be the same Southwold Town Council This design will be based on Hinkley. Aldringham Parish Council Why are they removing the mound? Chillesford Parish meeting Mission creep. -
1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews
1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews Meaning: Rushy Lake (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Carlford Deanery: Carlford (-1920), Ipswich (1920-) Union: Woodbridge, part of Ipswich Borough RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Woodbridge RD (1894-1934), Deben (1934- 1974) Suffolk Costal DC (1974-) Other administrative details: Created civil parish from part of Rushmere not within Ipswich (18%) Civil boundary change (1894) Part transferred to Ipswich (1934) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Augustine of Hippo (1928) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Andrew (1958) Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division Ipswich County Court District 3. Area: 1,523 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Deep well drained sandy often ferruginous soils, risk wind and water erosion b) Deep fine loam soils with slowly permeable subsoils and slight seasonal waterlogging. Some fine loam over clay. Some deep well drained coarse loam over clay, fine loam and sandy soils c) Deep well drained fine loam over clay, coarse loam over clay and fine loams some with olacareous subsoils. 5. Types of farming: 1086 17 ½ acres meadow 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pig-keeping, horse breeding and poultry. Crops mainly barley with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp. Also has similarities with sheep-corn region where sheep are main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening barley main cash crop. 1 1818 Marshall: Wide variations of crop and management techniques including summer fallow in preparation for corn and rotation of turnip, barley, clover, weat on lighter land. 1937 Main crops: Wheat, barley, beans, peas 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. -
Final Draft Report Rushmere St Andrew
RUSHMERE ST ANDREW Design Guidelines and Codes FINAL DRAFT REPORT March 2021 RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Quality information Prepared by Checked by Jimmy Lu Ben Castell Senior Urban Director Designer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position 3 - - - - 2 19-03-2021 Review Jimmy Lu Senior Urban Designer 1 18-01-2021 Report preparation Jimmy Lu Senior Urban and review Designer 0 15-01-2021 Report preparation Hoorieh Morshedi Graduate Urban Designer This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. 2 AECOM RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Contents 1. Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 1.1. Overview 6 1.2. Objective 6 1.3. Process 6 1.4. Area of study 8 2. Local character analysis �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Character areas 12 2.3. Settlement patterns and built forms 14 2.4. Streets and public realm 16 2.5. Open space 17 2.6. Building heights and roofline 18 2.7. Car parking 19 3. Design guidelines and codes ..........................................................................................................22 3.1. Introduction 22 3.2. Rushmere St Andrew design principles 22 3.3. Checklists 56 4. -
Letter from Over 100 Rural Business Owners September 2020
LETTER BY OVER 100 RURAL BUSINESS OWNERS to PM & SECRETARIES OF STATE 25 September 2020 The letter below is also signed by a further four businesses, represented by seven individuals, who requested their names be withheld from publication. It was published in the East Anglian Daily Times https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/sizewell-c-construction-opposed-by-suffolk-businesses-2700468 To: The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP, The Rt Hon Alok Sharma MP, The Rt Hon George Eustice MP, Minette Batters, President National Farmers’ Union Mark Bridgeman, President, Country Landowners’ Association Stephen Miles, President, Suffolk Agricultural Association cc Rt Hon Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park, Victoria Prentis MP, Lord Gardiner of Kimble, The Rt Hon Therese Coffey MP, Dr Dan Poulter MP, Peter Aldous MP, The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP, James Cartlidge MP, Jo Churchill MP, Tom Hunt MP Cllrs Matthew Hicks and Richard Rout, Suffolk County Council. Cllrs Steve Gallant and Craig Rivett, East Suffolk Council We the undersigned, as rural business owners, farmers and landowners in Suffolk, write to express our opposition to EDF’s plans to build two new nuclear reactors at Sizewell. The threat of Sizewell C has been hanging over the heads of many of our number for at least eight years now with no immediate end in sight. This would be tolerable if the Sizewell C project was for the “greater good” but we have concluded that it is not necessary to meet the UK’s commitment to net zero, and would be a slow, risky and expensive waste of taxpayers’ money that removes opportunities to make use of alternative, green, deliverable and cost-effective energy solutions. -
FOT Marketing All Shops.Qxd
BEESTONS Woodbridge - Waldringfield - Kirton - Bucklesham - Ipswich 179 Woodbridge - Bucklesham - Ipswich 178 MONDAY TO SATURDAY (Except Public Holidays) From: 4th April 2011 Operator: BE BE BE BE Service : 179 179 178 179A Notes : 1 1 1 1 MWF MWF Woodbridge, Hamblin Road, Turban Centre ............ -- 0930 1425 -- Woodbridge, Sandy Lane, opp Briarwood Road ......... -- 0932 1427 -- Woodbridge , California, Ashton House ........................ -- 0935 1430 -- Martlesham, Top Street, opp Water Bridge .................. -- 0938 1433 -- Martlesham Heath Tesco ............................................. -- 0941 1436 -- Waldringfield, Ipswich Road, Golf Course ................... 0720 0948 | -- Waldringfield, Cliff Road, opp Mill Road ...................... 0723 0951 | -- Newbourne, The Street, opp Fox ................................. 0728 0956 | -- Newbourne, Watermill Rd, opp Jacksons Road .......... 0730 0958 | -- Kirton, Falkenham Road, Rectory Lane ....................... 0735 1003 | -- Kirton, Falkenham Road, opp Post Office .................... 0736 1004 | -- Falkenham, Falkenham Road, opp Back Road ........... 0737 1005 | -- Kirton, Bucklesham Road, White Horse ....................... 0740 1008 | 1802 Bucklesham, A1094, School ........................................ 0745 1013 1440 1807 Bucklesham, Bucklesham Road, Shannon ................. 0747 1015 1442 1809 Ipswich, Bucklesham Rd, opp Woodhouse Lane ........ 0751 1019 1446 1813 Ipswich, Bucklesham Rd, opp Com Centre ................ 0755 1023 1450 1817 Ipswich, Woodbridge Road, -
The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe
The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe Research by Sheila Holmes July 2014 © Sheila Holmes Mattin Family The Mattin families lived in Campsea Ashe from at least 1803 until the early part of the 20th century. Thomas Mattin and his wife Elizabeth nee Curtis, lived in the neighbouring village of Hacheston. Their son Thomas, married a girl from Campsea Ashe, where they settled for the rest of their married lives. They brought up their children and some of whom continued to live in the village. The Mattin family, were connected to several other Campsea Ashe families through marriage, such as the Youngmans , Mays, Lings, Curtis’s, Townrows and Knights. It is possible that one branch of the family lived in Little Glemham but so far no definite connection has been found, In 1881, there were there were 6 Mattin families living in the village at same time. Connection with the Youngman family. John Youngman, born 15th December 1791 and died on 15th March 1874, Campsea Ashe, married Elizabeth Ling on 25th May 1813. Their daughter, Charlotte, born 1817, married Charles Mattin,. Charles and Charlotte had a son, Charles, born 1839. Young Charles Mattin lived with his grand parents, John and Elizabeth Youngman from the age of 2 in Campsea Ashe. Charged with Actual Bodily Harm. An entry in the records of the Quarter Sessions at Ipswich on 1st July 1870 states, Charles Mattin and James Mattin, the younger, were charged with causing actual bodily harm, were sentenced to 12 calendar months imprisonment with hard labour. It is not known who these two men were or indeed whether they were members of our Mattin family. -
Baptism Data Available
Suffolk Baptisms - January 2019 Data Available Baptism Register Deanery or Grouping From To Acton, All Saints Sudbury 1754 1900 Akenham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1903 Aldeburgh, St Peter & St Paul Orford 1754 1904 Alderton, St Andrew Wilford 1754 1902 Aldham, St Mary Sudbury 1754 1902 Aldringham cum Thorpe, St Andrew Dunwich 1754 1900 Aldringham, Particular Baptist Baptist 1809 1837 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul Sudbury 1754 1901 Alpheton, St Peter & St Paul (BTs) Sudbury 1780 1792 Ampton, St Peter Thedwastre 1650 1903 Ashbocking, All Saints Bosmere 1754 1900 Ashby, St Mary Lothingland 1813 1900 Ashfield cum Thorpe, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Great Ashfield, All Saints Blackbourn 1765 1901 Aspall, St Mary of Grace Hartismere 1754 1900 Assington, St Edmund Sudbury 1754 1900 Athelington, St Peter Hoxne 1754 1904 Bacton, St Mary Hartismere 1754 1901 Badingham, St John the Baptist Hoxne 1754 1900 Badley, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1902 Badwell Ash, St Mary Blackbourn 1650 1900 Bardwell, Baptist Baptist 1820 1837 Bardwell, St Peter & St Paul Blackbourn 1650 1901 Barham, St Mary Claydon 1754 1901 Barking, St Mary Bosmere 1754 1900 Barnardiston, All Saints Clare 1650 1899 Barnby, St John the Baptist Lothingland 1813 1900 Barnham, St Gregory Blackbourn 1730 1902 Barningham, St Andrew Blackbourn 1650 1901 Barrow, All Saints Thingoe 1754 1900 Barsham, Holy Trinity Wangford 1813 1900 Great Barton, Holy Innocents Thedwastre 1650 1901 Barton Mills, St Mary Fordham 1663 1901 01 January 2019 Copyright © Suffolk Family History Society 2019 Page 1 of 16 Baptism Register -
Rushmere St Andrew, Ipswich
RUSHMER E S T ANDR EW, IPSWI CH CHOOSE FROM OF THE MOST LUXURIOUS HOMES IN THE HEART OF 10RURAL SUFFOLK An enviable mix of location, quality and style, a Rose home is luxury redefined – a truly enviable place to live. With just 5, five bedroom homes and 5 four bedroom homes this is a rare opportunity to own a signature property from Rose that boasts indulgent luxury. Just 7* minutes from Ipswich town centre, with its eclectic mix of independent and high street shops, and a host of places to eat, as well as being just a short drive from the coast, this is truly a premium location. *All times and distances are an approximation only. N W E S SITE 8 PLAN 5 6 7 Each of the 10 properties at Eaton Place is perfectly proportioned and truly make the most of their stunning 9 setting on the edge of the Suffolk countryside, with an abundance of surrounding space. Each property combines 4 a perfect blend of style and functionality, making Eaton Place the ideal location for your new home. 3 2 10 1 Whilst this development plan has been prepared with all due care for the convenience of the intending purchaser, the information contained herein is a preliminary guide only. Ground levels and other variances have not been shown. THE APPROACH SETS THE STANDARD FOR THE NEW HOMES; A SOLID, PANELLED, BESPOKE ‘BRICK’ WALLED ENTRANCE CREATES A SENSE OF SECURITY AND EXCLUSIVITY, THAT YOU HAVE ARRIVED... AT EATON PLACE. The homes are individually designed to an exacting detail, in a traditional format yet meeting the demand for modern WHITE contemporary layouts. -
FOI/ EIR Disclosure Log: East Suffolk Council March 2021 Date Received
FOI/ EIR disclosure log: East Suffolk Council March 2021 Date Date Request ref Request title Released/ refused received completed Released in part 01/03/2021 FOI312796773 Correspondence between Ropeth and ESC exemption applied 01/04/2021 Released in part 01/03/2021 FOI312791636 Telecoms installed upon Council property exemption applied 01/04/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312783866 Covid 19 vaccines and care homes Released in full 03/03/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312290115 Personal Search EIR - 6 Hillside Court, Bungay, NR35 1JY Released in full 05/03/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312286186 Personal Search EIR - 62 Rosemary Avenue, Felixstowe, IP11 9HN Released in full 05/03/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312256123 Personal Search EIR - 32 The Pastures, Rushmere St Andrew, Ipswich, IP4 5UQ Released in full 05/03/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312248673 Personal Search EIR - 15 Rogers Close, Felixstowe, IP11 9DG Released in full 08/03/2021 01/03/2021 FOI312244861 Personal Search EIR - 2 The Avenue, Halesworth, IP19 8JB Released in full 15/03/2021 Refused Suffolk County 02/03/2021 FOI313130560 Unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) Council 04/03/2021 02/03/2021 FOI313124968 Empty Properties Released in full 30/03/2021 02/03/2021 FOI312955281 Council Tax increase Released in full 15/03/2021 02/03/2021 FOI312685609 Personal Search EIR - 5 Butterfly Drive, Beccles, NR34 9YJ Released in full 09/03/2021 02/03/2021 FOI312683228 Personal Search EIR - 7 Bumblebee Gardens, Beccles, NR34 9ZB Released in full 09/03/2021 02/03/2021 FOI312675950 Personal Search EIR - 21 Bumblebee Gardens, Beccles, -
Babergh District Council Work Completed Since April
WORK COMPLETED SINCE APRIL 2015 BABERGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Exchange Area Locality Served Total Postcodes Fibre Origin Suffolk Electoral SCC Councillor MP Premises Served Division Bildeston Chelsworth Rd Area, Bildeston 336 IP7 7 Ipswich Cosford Jenny Antill James Cartlidge Boxford Serving "Exchange Only Lines" 185 CO10 5 Sudbury Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Bures Church Area, Bures 349 CO8 5 Sudbury Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Clare Stoke Road Area 202 CO10 8 Haverhill Clare Mary Evans James Cartlidge Glemsford Cavendish 300 CO10 8 Sudbury Clare Mary Evans James Cartlidge Hadleigh Serving "Exchange Only Lines" 255 IP7 5 Ipswich Hadleigh Brian Riley James Cartlidge Hadleigh Brett Mill Area, Hadleigh 195 IP7 5 Ipswich Samford Gordon Jones James Cartlidge Hartest Lawshall 291 IP29 4 Bury St Edmunds Melford Richard Kemp James Cartlidge Hartest Hartest 148 IP29 4 Bury St Edmunds Melford Richard Kemp James Cartlidge Hintlesham Serving "Exchange Only Lines" 136 IP8 3 Ipswich Belstead Brook David Busby James Cartlidge Nayland High Road Area, Nayland 228 CO6 4 Colchester Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Nayland Maple Way Area, Nayland 151 CO6 4 Colchester Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Nayland Church St Area, Nayland Road 408 CO6 4 Colchester Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Nayland Bear St Area, Nayland 201 CO6 4 Colchester Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Nayland Serving "Exchange Only Lines" 271 CO6 4 Colchester Stour Valley James Finch James Cartlidge Shotley Shotley Gate 201 IP9 1 Ipswich -
1. Parish: Playford
1. Parish: Playford Meaning: Ford where sports were held 2. Hundred: Carlford Deanery: Carlford (-1972), Woodbridge (1972-) Union: Woodbridge RDC/UDC: (E.Suffolk) Woodbridge RD(1894-1934), Deben RD (1934-1974), Suffolk Coastal DC (1974-) Other administrative details: Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division and County Court District 3. Area: 1,329 (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Deep well drained sandy often ferruginous soils, risk wind and water erosion b) Deep fine loam soils with slowly permeable subsoils and slightly seasonal waterlogging. Some fine loam over clay, some deep well drained coarse loams over clay, fine loam and sandy soils. 5. Types of farming: 1086 Wood for 20 pigs, 23 acres meadow, 1 mill, 1 cattle, 25 pigs, 26 sheep, 1 beehive 1500–1640 Thirsk: Sheep corn region where sheep are main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening. Barley main cash crop. Also has similarities with wood-pasture region with pasture, meadow, dairying and some pig keeping 1818 Marshall: Wide variations of crop and management techniques including summer fallow in preparation for corn and rotation of turnip, barley, clover, wheat on lighter lands 1937 Main Crops: Wheat, barley, roots, extensive meadow land 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6. Enclosure: 7. Settlement: 1 1958 Small compact development to north of railway. Church situated slightly to NE of settlement. Small rivers criss-cross the parish, associated wet lands restricted development in these areas. Heathland occupies southern sector of parish. Railway crosses parish centrally W-E Scattered farms Inhabited houses: 1674 – 18, 1801 – 24, 1851 – 59, 1871 –56, 1901 – 56, 1951 – 70, 1981 – 87 8.