E. Development Proposals in the Concept Plan E1. Cross-Boundary Transport Hub at Siu Ho
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
E. Development Proposals in the Concept Plan E1. Cross-boundary Transport Hub at Siu Ho Wan E2. Lantau Logistics Park at Siu Ho Wan and Possible Logistics Park Extension or Recreational Use E3. Leisure and Entertainment Node at Sunny Bay E4. Possible Theme Park or Recreational Use at Tung Chung East E5. Golf Course cum Resort at Tsing Chau Tsai East E6. Resort Facilities in South Lantau E7. Hotel Facilities E8. Museum of Lantau and Eco-Tour Centre E9. Facelift of Mui Wo E10. Preservation of Tai O Fishing Village E11. Cycle Track and Mountain Bike Trail Networks E12. Watersports Centres and Boardwalks in South Lantau E13. Eco-Trails and Heritage Trails E14. High-quality Camping Sites E15. Lantau North (Extension) Country Park E16. South West Lantau Marine Park E1. Cross-boundary Transport Hub at Siu Ho Wan Background Siu Ho Wan is strategically located close to the North Lantau Highway Connection (NLHC) of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) and has the potential to serve as a transport interchange for cross-boundary traffic. A possible location of the cross-boundary transport hub is at MTR Siu Ho Wan Depot. The depot occupies 30 ha of land, with flexibility built into the design for retrofitting development above the depot. MTR access to Siu Ho Wan on the Tung Chung Line could be provided by the construction of an additional station, subject to Government’s approval for the station and authorization under the relevant Ordinance. The cross-boundary transport hub has the potential to be a major transport interchange, providing park-and-ride facilities, a MTR station and a public transport interchange. It would be able to provide convenient transfer to rail services for travelling to the city centre and would reduce the pressure of external traffic on the urban road network. The proposal is in line with the transport policy of having railway as the backbone and helps meet the need for park-and-ride facilities in the longer term for vehicles coming from the Pearl River West. Commercial uses above the transport hub would be possible, subject to authorization under the relevant Ordinances. Key Issues Owing to some misunderstanding that reclamation is required for the proposed transport hub, some negative comments on the possible adverse environmental impacts were received during the consultation on the Concept Plan. Otherwise, the proposed cross-boundary transport hub is generally supported. p.204 Annex 4 – E1 The Way Forward The MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) is the proponent of the proposed development. Upon receipt of the development proposal from MTRCL, the proposal will need to be carefully examined by the Government. The submission should include development details with supporting technical assessments demonstrating the viability, land use compatibility, environmental acceptability and technical feasibility of the proposed development. No. Summary of Comments Raised By Responses General E1-1 The proposal to provide a HKIP (230) Noted. cross-boundary transport Citybus Ltd. (73) hub to encourage transfer of MTRCL (453) travelers from HZMB to rail is Ng Wing-choi (308) supported. This scheme Lantau Post (90) should be helpful in reducing HK Islands District the pressure of external Assoc. (321) traffic on the urban road So Tat-fai (346) network and hence preserve Islands DC (491) the urban living environment. Joint Submission from Hon Tam Yiu-chung et al. (538) TAC (TAC) E1-2 The proposed transport hub Green Lantau Assoc. Siu Ho Wan is strategically development is a result of (274) located close to the NLHC of the short-sighted decision mainly Dr Martin Williams HZMB and the proposed because rail link is not (352) transport hub has the potential to incorporated in the HZMB. provide convenient and direct interchange for passengers and rail service to the city centre. It could help reduce the pressure of external traffic on the urban road network and environmental pollution. The suggestion of incorporating railways on the HZMB is a subject being examined and the findings far do not support the suggestion. See also responses in F1-28. Need for the Transport Hub E1-3 The cross-boundary So Tat-fai (346) Noted. transport hub is a necessity for future development. Annex 4 – E1 p.205 No. Summary of Comments Raised By Responses E1-4 Justifications for the need, Sam Chow (393) Siu Ho Wan is strategically cost and benefits of the Green Power (440) located close to the NLHC of the transport hub should be HZMB and the proposed provided. transport hub has the potential to provide convenient and direct interchange for passengers and rail service to the city centre. It could help reduce the pressure of external traffic on the urban road network and environmental pollution. The proposal is in line with the transport policy of having railway as the backbone and helps meet the need for park-and-ride facilities in the longer term for vehicles coming from the Pearl River West. The feasibility and viability of the proposal will be subject to further study by MTRCL, the project proponent. E1-5 Reference should be made TAC (TAC) Regulatory arrangements for to the capacity of the cross-boundary vehicles via park-and-ride facilities in HZMB would be formulated in determining the number of due course taking into account cross-boundary vehicles that the vailablity or otherwise of would be permitted to enter park-and-ride facilities. Hong Kong via HZMB. The Proposed Location of the Transport Hub E1-6 The proposed location for Sam Chow (393) See responses in E1-4. the transport hub at Siu Ho Green Power (440) Wan should be justified. E1-7 To avoid further reclamation, Cheung Man-kuen It should be clarified that the the proposed transport hub (367) proposed transport hub is to be should be relocated to the Mr. So (368) located at the existing Siu Ho Airport Island since it is close Wan MTR Depot site without the to the landing point of the need for reclamation. Siu Ho HZMB and has readily Wan is strategically located close available land resources. to the NLHC of the HZMB and has the potential to be a transport interchange for cross-boundary traffic. The feasibility of the proposal will be subject to further study by MTRCL, the project proponent. p.206 Annex 4 – E1 No. Summary of Comments Raised By Responses E1-8 The proposed transport hub Samantha Wong (422)It should be clarified that the development at South proposed cross-boundary Lantau is not supported as it transport hub is located at the would destroy the beautiful existing Siu Ho Wan MTR depot scenery there. site in North Lantau. Environmental Issues E1-9 The proposed large transport Nigel Easterbrook (11) The proposed transport hub, if interchange on the northern constructed, could serve as a shore of Lantau is not transport interchange for compatible with the adjacent providing convenient interchange tourism uses. services for both local population and visitors and is considered compatible with the adjacent tourism uses. E1-10 The possible environmental So Tat-fai (346) Technical assessments together impacts caused by the with the detailed development proposed transport hub proposal are required to be should be carefully examined submitted by the project and assessed. proponent to demonstrate that the proposed development will have no adverse environmental impacts on the surrounding areas. E1-11 No development details are Sam Chow (393) It should be clarified that the provided relating to the proposed transport hub is to be proposal. At least, an located at the existing Siu Ho estimate of the reclamation Wan MTR Depot site without the extent should be provided by need for reclamation. The the Government. proposal is still at preliminary conceptual stage for public comment. The feasibility and viability would be subject to further study by the project proponent. E1-12 The reclamation involved for Prof Chan King-ming See responses in E1-11. the proposed transport hub (205) would pose risks to the habitat of the Chinese White Dolphin. E1-13 The proposed Friends of the Earth See responses in E1-11. cross-boundary transport HK (385) hub, together with the The natural coastline of North adjacent proposed logistics Lantau will not be affected by the park, would destroy more of proposed transport hub the natural coastline of North development. Lantau. Annex 4 – E1 p.207 No. Summary of Comments Raised By Responses E1-14 The proposed reclamation Prof Chan King-ming See responses in E1-10. for the transport hub might (205) have impacts on the Tai Ho Stream SSSI which is of significant ecological value. This is not a sustainable development. E1-15 The proposed transport hub Julian T H Kwong See responses in E1-10. is likely sizeable and could (350) have serious repercussions on the Tai Ho Wan environment. E1-16 The proposed large transport Nigel Easterbrook (11) See responses in E1-10. interchange would degrade the north shore of Lantau and not enhance the area. E1-17 There are concerns on the Prof Chan King-ming See responses in E1-10. worsening of air quality in (205) Tung Chung caused by the Green Lantau Assoc. proposed transport hub (274) which would attract more Cheung Man-kuen vehicles, in particular (367) cross-boundary vehicles Mr. So (368) failing to meet Hong Kong emission standards, to the area. E1-18 Similar to other major Lau Tai-yin (451) The proposed transport hub infrastructure projects, the should be subject to detailed proposed transport hub feasibility study by the project should go through all EIA proponent and will be considered procedures and public by the Government. The consultation for the project proponent would have to confirmation of the site demonstrate that the proposed selection and the layout transport hub would have no design.