DOCSLIB.ORG

NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT ZONE: Empirical Relations and the Changes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT ZONE: Empirical Relations and the Changes World Journal of Research and Review (WJRR) ISSN:2455-3956, Volume-6, Issue-3, March 2018 Pages 38-61 North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northern Turkey: Empirical Equations and the Changes in Some Kinematic Characteristics Mehmet UTKU · İzmit via Düzce, Akyazı (Adapazarı), Sapanca Abstract- Monitoring the seismological development of a (Adapazarı), Gölcük (İzmit) and Hersek (İzmit), meets seismotectonic source is important to know the future the Ganos (Gaziköy, Tekirdağ) Fault to the north of the behavior of the source concerned. The North Anatolian Marmara Sea, and is conveyed to the Aegean Sea. Its Fault Zone is one of the important seismotectonic sources in other branch again reaches the Ganos Fault via Geyve the world. The seismic moment-magnitude relations were computed according to the macroseismic and instrumental (Adapazarı), İznik (Bursa) and Gemlik (Bursa) routes after Bolu, in the south of the Armutlu Peninsula and by observations of 29 earthquakes with mb,S 4.8 that occurred in the North Anatolian Fault Zone in the 1909- passing through the Marmara Sea almost centrally. 2000 period. The relations of seismic moment for this Another branch of it progresses on land in the south of tectonic structure according to the surface wave magnitude the Marmara Sea and extends to the Aegean Sea via the and according to the fault area and the change in stress Biga Peninsula. drop are the other seismological characteristics addressed in this study. Depending on the other parameters within the So far, many studies have been made with respect to scope of the study, the threshold magnitude value and the the NAFZ [38], [37], [39], [23], [36], [17], [56], [54], mean slip rate for the visible fault on the ground surface are [55], [7], [6], [5], [16], [27]. Mean displacement computed as 6.2 (Ms) and 2.2 cm/year, respectively. velocities of 3 cm/year or 4 cm/year and even up to 11 According to the 13958 earthquakes with M 3.0 that cm/year were found in these studies according to the data occurred in the North Anatolian Fault Zone in the period then [4], [35], [11]. Of them, a similar study which most between 11/24/0029 (29 A.D.) and 12/31/2014, the return closely fit the information obtained from the observation period of a possible major earthquake to be generated by this zone is 250 years at the most. The a- and b- values results and from the instrumental data was made by which characterize the Zone are 4 and - 0.8 on an average, Canıtez and Ezen (1973) with 8 earthquakes with mb respectively. 6.0 in the 1900-1971 period, and it calculated the stress When the results in this study – obtained according to the drops of 39 earthquakes by deriving statistics. Later on, 91-year data process and the 101-year evaluation process – the 8 earthquakes with M 6.0 between 1939 and 1967 are compared with the results known from the previous s studies, the latest results appear more reliable both in terms were used by Ezen (1981) to estimate various relations of the length of the process considered and the quality of the between source parameters and magnitude. Some 7 data used. When the behavior of the seismotectonic source earthquakes were common in both studies. Barka and concerned is monitored depending on this, it is seen that Kadinsky-Cade (1988) investigated the segmentation of some seismological characters remained stable, while some two major strike-slip fault zones in Turkey. Wells and of them changed. Coppersmith (1994) compiled 421 historical earthquakes Index Terms - NAFZ, Empirical equations, threshold magnitude, stress drop, seismic moment, slip rate, a- values, worldwide. By using 244 earthquakes selected, they b- values. developed the empirical relationships among various I. INTRODUCTION source parameters such as moment magnitude, surface The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) is an essential rupture length, subsurface rupture length, downdip tectonic structure which plays the leading role in the rupture width, rupture area, and maximum and average regional tectonics thanks to the intracontinental transform displacement. fault identity it has maintained so far [53], [52], [8]. It is Of the studies in recent years, Ambraseys and Jackson an approximately 1400-km-long seismotectonic source (2000) deal with the seismic activity that occurred in the that originates from the surroundings of Karlıova Marmara Sea in the last 500 years. Accordingly, it is (Bingöl) in the east, continues with three branches after stated that an evident seismic activity was experienced in Niksar (Tokat), Ladik (Samsun), Kargı (Çorum), Tosya the Marmara Region in the 20th century; however, (Kastamonu) and Bolu, crosses the Marmara, and reaches throughout these 500 years, only the 18th century the Aegean Sea. The NAFZ, which last gained currency displayed a comparative seismic activity that also had with the August 17, 1999 (Mw=7.4) Gölcük (İzmit) processes which did not generate earthquakes with a earthquake and the November 12, 1999 (Mw=7.2) Düzce magnitude of 6.8 (Ms) and greater. Moreover, two (Bolu) earthquake, has a branch that crosses the Gulf of regions with late Quaternary faulting are mentioned, namely the north-west of the Marmara Sea and the southern branch of the North Anatolian Fault to the east · Mehmet UTKU Department of Geophysical Engineering, Faculty of of Bursa. The same authors state that the historic Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, TR-35160, Buca-İzmir, Turkey earthquakes near İstanbul had magnitudes in the range 38 www.wjrr.org North Anatolian Fault Zone, Northern Turkey: Empirical Equations and the Changes in Some Kinematic Characteristics 6.8-7.2 (Ms) and occurred offshore and that the smaller by stress accumulation and creep. Bayrak et al. (2011) ones occurred in the east and west of the Marmara Sea. discussed the evaluation in the earthquake hazard In addition, they note that the seismicity for the last 500 parameters by dividing the North Anatolian Fault Zone years has been taking place with right-lateral into different segments. They used the method of Kijko displacement above 22 ± 3 mm/year, expected in the and Sellevoll (1989, 1992) in this study of theirs. Marmara Region. Gürbüz et al. (2000) indicate the Yucemen and Akkaya (2012) present a case study about seismic gaps concerning the 1754 earthquake with an the estimation of magnitude-frequency relationship using epicenter corresponding to the Gulf of İzmit and the 1766 the Modified Maximum Likelihood method. Le Pichon et earthquake with an epicenter corresponding to the central al. (2014) defined the geometry of the Southern Marmara Marmara basin, both with a magnitude of 7.5, in the Fault particularly on the basis of the exploration of seismotectonics of the Marmara Region that they seismic reflection profiles. Şengör et al. (2014) described discussed on the basis of the minor earthquakes they had the geometry of the North Anatolian Fault Zone in the recorded. Furthermore, they state that the distribution of Sea of Marmara in light of the multichannel seismic depths belonging to the seismicity in this area is reflection profiles in the Sea of Marmara. Scholz (2002), shallower than 15 km. Polat et al. (2002a,b) discuss the Shaw and Wesnousky (2008), Senatorski (2012), Shaw August 17, 1999 (Mw = 7.4) Gölcük (İzmit) earthquake in (2013) and Konstantinou (2014) dealt with the mechanics terms of the change in seismicity, its aftershocks, and the and kinematics of earthquakes and the faulting process. regional seismotectonics. In their study, the authors One of the recent studies was made by Yamamoto et al. emphasize that there had been no evident seismic activity (2015). In the study, they analyzed the data recorded by before the earthquake concerned. By quoting from Barka three ocean bottom seismographs (OBSs) over a period et al. (2000), Polat et al. (2002a) state that the surface of 3 months in 2014 to investigate the relationship of fault of the İzmit earthquake was above 150 km in the E- fault geometry to microseismicity under the western W direction and that the maximum displacement was Marmara Sea in Turkey. They showed that most of the measured as 5 m. In addition, they explain that the microearthquakes they identified occurred along the aftershocks were distributed in the upper section of the Marmara Fault (MMF). Their data indicate that the fault depth of the first 15 km and that 90% of them had depths plane of the MMF is almost vertical. They identified a between 5 and 15 km. They stress that the depth of the seismogenic zone that extends from 13 to 25 km depth main shock was 15 km. Utku (2003) investigated the through the upper and lower crust beneath the western macroseismic and instrumental observations for 29 Marmara Sea. earthquakes with magnitudes mb 4.8 that occurred in In this study, the seismic moment (M0)-magnitude the 1900-2002 period. In this study, they computed the (mb,Ms) and seismic moment-fault plane (A) relations stress drop as below 50 bars and intended to estimate the and the change in stress drop () that occurred along the seismic character of the zone concerned from the zone are examined according to the data about the behavior of the maximum annual magnitudes. earthquakes with mb,s 4.8 that occurred in the NAFZ in Accordingly, the behavior curve concerned reaches the the 1900-2000 process. mb and Ms denote body and maximum point 15 years after the minimum point on surface wave magnitudes, respectively. The study also average. The data period available for this evaluation encompasses the threshold magnitude value and the total based on data of almost 100 years is significant. Bayrak and mean displacement velocities for the visible fault and Öztürk (2004) discuss the time and spatial changes along the zone concerned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey)
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol.Z. ÖZCAN 21, 2012, ET pp. AL. 933–960. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-1102-8 First published online 25 April 2011 Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey) ZAHİDE ÖZCAN1, ARAL I. OKAY1,2, ERCAN ÖZCAN2, AYNUR HAKYEMEZ3 & SEVİNÇ ÖZKAN-ALTINER4 1 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey 3 General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA Genel Müdürlüğü), Geological Research Department, TR−06520 Ankara, Turkey 4 Middle East Technical University (METU), Department of Geological Engineering, Ünversiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupınar Bulvarı No. 1, TR−06800 Ankara, Turkey Received 17 February 2011; revised typescript receipt 04 April 2011; accepted 25 April 2011 Abstract: Th e Late Cretaceous–Eocene geological evolution of northwest Turkey between the Black Sea and Bursa was studied through detailed biostratigraphic characterization of eleven stratigraphic sections. Th e Upper Cretaceous sequence in the region starts with a major marine transgression and lies unconformably on a basement of Palaeozoic and Triassic rocks in the north (İstanbul-type basement) and on metamorphic rocks and Jurassic sedimentary rocks in the south (Sakarya-type basement). Four megasequences have been diff erentiated in the Late Cretaceous–Eocene interval. Th e fi rst one, of Turonian to Late Campanian age, is represented by volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks in the north along the Black Sea coast, and by siliciclastic turbidites and intercalated calcarenites in the south, corresponding to magmatic arc basin and fore-arc basin, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismology of the North Anatolian Fault at Güzelköy
    Paleoseismology of the North Anatolian Fault at Güzelköy (Ganos segment, Turkey): Size and recurrence time of earthquake ruptures west of the Sea of Marmara Mustapha Meghraoui, M. Ersen Aksoy, H Serdar Akyüz, Matthieu Ferry, Aynur Dikbaş, Erhan Altunel To cite this version: Mustapha Meghraoui, M. Ersen Aksoy, H Serdar Akyüz, Matthieu Ferry, Aynur Dikbaş, et al.. Pale- oseismology of the North Anatolian Fault at Güzelköy (Ganos segment, Turkey): Size and recurrence time of earthquake ruptures west of the Sea of Marmara. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, AGU and the Geochemical Society, 2012, 10.1029/2011GC003960. hal-01264190 HAL Id: hal-01264190 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01264190 Submitted on 1 Feb 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Article Volume 13, Number 4 12 April 2012 Q04005, doi:10.1029/2011GC003960 ISSN: 1525-2027 Paleoseismology of the North Anatolian Fault at Güzelköy (Ganos segment, Turkey): Size and recurrence time of earthquake ruptures west of the Sea of Marmara Mustapha Meghraoui Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg (UMR 7516), F-67084 Strasbourg, France ([email protected]) M. Ersen Aksoy Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg (UMR 7516), F-67084 Strasbourg, France Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey Now at Instituto Dom Luiz, Universidade de Lisboa, P-1750-129 Lisbon, Portugal H.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue “The Next Marmara Earthquake: Disaster Mitigation
    Hori et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2017) 69:65 DOI 10.1186/s40623-017-0648-9 PREFACE Open Access Special issue “The next Marmara earthquake: disaster mitigation, recovery, and early warning” Takane Hori1*, Ali Pinar2, Ocal Necmioglu2, Muneo Hori3 and Azusa Nishizawa4 Te Marmara Sea, accommodating the fault segments of with Mw = 7.25 on the Main Marmara Fault is expected a major transform fault, is well known as a seismic gap to heavily damage or destroy 2–4% of the near 1,000,000 along the North Anatolian Fault (NAF), running through buildings in Istanbul, which has a population of around the northern part of Turkey and connecting the East 13 million, with 9–15% of the buildings receiving Anatolian convergent area with the Hellenic subduction medium damage and 20–34% of the buildings lightly zone (e.g., Pınar 1943; Toksöz et al. 1979; Pondard et al. damaged (Erdik 2013). 2007; Şengör et al. 2014). It is obvious from historical Te aim of this special issue is to gather information records spanning more than 2000 years that the region about the risk of another Marmara earthquake from the is subject to frequent strong shaking that is likely associ- latest geophysical, geological, geotechnical, computa- ated with tsunami waves, threatening heavily populated tional, and building science research results to discuss and industrialized locations (Ambraseys 2002; Erdik et al. ways of mitigating disaster in advance. Te collection 2004; Hébert et al. 2005). In the twentieth century, mag- of 12 papers constituting this special issue is based on nitude (M) 7-class earthquakes sequentially occurred recent research on imaging the crustal structure, the from east to west along the NAF zone, as shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Reflection, Well Log, and Gravity Analysis of the Thrace
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Spring 2016 Seismic Reflection, ellW Log, And Gravity Analysis Of The Thrace Basin, Northwestern Turkey Murat Kuvanc As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geophysics and Seismology Commons Recommended Citation Kuvanc, Murat, "Seismic Reflection, ellW Log, And Gravity Analysis Of The Thrace Basin, Northwestern Turkey" (2016). MSU Graduate Theses. 2372. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/2372 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEISMIC REFLECTION, WELL LOG, AND GRAVITY ANALYSIS OF THE THRACE BASIN, NORTHWESTERN TURKEY A Master Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Natural Applied Sciences By Murat Kuvanc May, 2016 Copyright 2016 by Murat Kuvanc ii SEISMIC REFLECTION, WELL LOG, AND GRAVITY ANALYSIS OF THE THRACE BASIN, NORTHWESTERN TURKEY Geography, Geology, and Planning Missouri State University, May 2016 Master of Natural Applied Sciences Murat Kuvanc ABSTRACT The Thrace basin is located between the Paleogene the Istranca and Rhdope massifs in the northwestern part of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Geochronology of Mineral Deposits in the Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey
    OREGEO-00920; No of Pages 31 Ore Geology Reviews xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev A prospective sector in the Tethyan Metallogenic Belt: Geology and geochronology of mineral deposits in the Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey Ozcan Yigit ⁎ Department of Geological Engineering, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale 17020, Turkey article info abstract Article history: The Tethyan Metallogenic Belt (TMB), extending from Europe through Anatolia to Iran, is one of the world's major Received 18 December 2010 metal producing belts, and consists of many sectors. Mineral deposits of the Biga Peninsula in northwestern Received in revised form 2 June 2011 Turkey exhibit, in many ways, the characteristics of mineral deposits found throughout the belt. Biga Peninsula Accepted 29 September 2011 tectonically forms the westernmost part of the Sakarya Zone and easternmost part of the Rhodope Zone at the Available online xxxx intersection of Gondwana and Laurasia. The Biga Peninsula metallogeny research and exploration project created a GIS inventory of mineral deposits Keywords: fi Turkey and prospects, and classi ed them genetically to evaluate the mineral deposit potential using genetic models Biga Peninsula based on descriptive data. The GIS database, consisting of 128 deposits or prospects, helped to generate new Geochronology prospects and potential prospects. This field-based study indicated that the Biga Peninsula forms a prime tar- Tethyan metallogeny get for gold–copper exploration not only in Turkey but in the world. Porphyry Au–Cu–Mo The current economically significant mineral deposits of the Biga Peninsula were shaped by Cenozoic calc- Epithermal alkaline magmatism, ranging between 52 and 18 Ma, and related to mainly collisional and post-collisional Skarn tectonic regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Earthquake in Turkey--Aug 17 at 3:02 AM Local Time in Turkey
    Major Earthquake in Turkey 99/08/17 00:01:38 40.64N 29.83E 10.0 7.4Ms Warning--Provisional report, subject to revision The following is a News Release by the United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center: Update on the 17 August 1999 Izmit, Turkey, Earthquake. USGS ADJUSTS THE MAGNITUDE OF TURKEY EARTHQUAKE On the basis of additional data, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has updated the magnitude of the destructive earthquake that struck western Turkey early Tuesday, to 7.4. The initial preliminary magnitude, of 7.8, was based on recordings of seismic waves from a limited number of global stations that rapidly transmit data to the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) in Golden, Colo. Scientists at the NEIC have since received additional data that permit a more accurate determination of the earthquake’s location, magnitude, and depth. The Izmit earthquake occurred at 00:01:39.80 UTC (3:01 a.m. local time), and was centered at at 40.702 N., 29.987 E., which places the epicenter about 11 kilometers, or seven miles, southeast of the city of Izmit. This location indicates that the earthquake occurred on the northernmost strand of the North Anatolian fault system. The earthquake originated at a depth of 17 kilometers, or about 10.5 miles, and caused right-lateral strike-slip movement on the fault. Preliminary field reports confirm this type of motion on the fault, and initial field observations indicate that the earthquake produced at least 60 kilometers (37 miles) of surface rupture and right-lateral offsets as large as 2.7 meters, or almost nine feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Pertek Kalesi Pertek Kalesi
    ERTUĞRUL DANIK* PERTEK KALESİ PERTEK KALESI I. ESKİ PERTEK'İN metinlerinde geçen "Pittiiarik" kentinin Pertek COĞRAFYASI VE JEOLOJİSİ olarak önerilmesi^ bu konuya ilişkin ilk ve tek bilgi olarak görülmektedir. Her ne kadar yerleşim nfik dönemdeki adı ile Arsanias'ın yani yerinde yeterli ve detaylı araştırma ya da bilimsel Murat Nehri'nin kıyısında, Tunceli iline kazı yapılmamışsa do, mevcut kimi bilgiler bağlı bugünkü Pertek ilçe merkezinin 5 A bölgede Hitit, Asur ve Unartu egemenliklerinin km güneyinde kurulu iken, Keban Baraj yaşandığını göstermektedir. Bu egemenlikler Gölü rezervuar alanı içinde kalan Eski Pertek sırasında ise, kale alanının kullanıldığını^ kale kenti; dönemi içinde güneyde Elazığ ili ile içinde ve kalenin oturduğu kayalık alanda bulu­ sınırlanırken; doğusunda, batısında ve kuzeyinde, nan işçiliklerden anlayabilmeldeyiz. kuzeye doğru gittikçe yükselen dağ sıraları ile çewilidir. Batı yönünde Kurmizak ve Çemişkezek, Hitit metinlerindeki "Pittiarik" dışında farklı kuzey yönünde Sağman, doğu yönünde Mazgirt bir isim önermesi bulunmayan Pertek yerleşiminin, kaleleri, güney yönünde ise Bekçiler ve Harput adı ve kaynağı konusunda ilk önermeyi yapan kalesi, yakın ilişkili kaleler durumdadır. Evliya Çelebi, kalede bir dönem var olduğunu Güneydeki alçak seviyeli tepelerin söylediği bir karakuş kabartması ya da heykeli­ oluşturduğu Harput Platosu'na ve dönemin Murat nin, Moğol dilinde "Pertek" olarak anıldığını belir­ Vadisi'nden batıdaki Çemişkezek'e doğru giden tir'. Evliya Çelebi'nin görmediği ancak, var az engebeli alana karşın, doğu ve kuzeyde yer olduğunu söylediği söz konusu heykelin varlığı ve obn yüksek rakımlı dağ sıraları, günümüzde de açıklaması, Pertek adının açıklaması için yetersiz olduğu gibi, Pertek'i daha çok güney yöndeki kalırken; bu görüşten sonra gelen önermeler Harput ve batıdaki Çemişkezek ile ilişki kurmaya arasındaki en ciddi öneri "küçük kale" ya da zorlamıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1509 Istanbul Earthquake and Subsequent Recovery
    The 1509 Istanbul Earthquake and Subsequent Recovery Kazuaki SAWAI Le Tremblement de terre d’Istanbul de 1509 et les efforts de reconstruction de l’après-séisme L’Anatolie (connue aussi sous le nom d’Asie Mineure) comprend 97% du territoire de la République de Turquie actuelle. Cette région a été de longue date une zone exposée aux tremblements de terre, ayant des magnitudes sismiques comparables à celles du Japon, pays réputé pour ses séismes. L’Anatolie repose sur la plaque tectonique Anatolienne, entourée par l’énorme plaque eurasienne au nord, la plaque arabique à l’est, la plaque de la mer Égée à l’ouest, et la plaque africaine au sud. Les lignes de failles qui en résultent, comme la faille nord anatolienne allant de l’est vers l’ouest, ont causé de nombreux tremblements de terre. En Août 1999, par exemple, un séisme de magnitude 7.5 a secoué une grande partie du nord-ouest de l’Anatolie, y compris Istanbul, tuant 17,000 personnes et causant d’énormes dégâts. Les tremblements de terre ne sont pas un phénomène nouveau en Anatolie. Les nombreux documents historiques disponibles décrivant des catastrophes naturelles à Istanbul montrent à eux seuls que des séismes majeurs y étaient récurrents. Un tremblement de terre particulièrement dévastateur a eu lieu en Septembre 1509. Cet événement était localement connu sous le nom de “Kıyamet-i Suğra” (le Jour du Jugement mineur) en raison des nombreuses victimes et graves dégâts qu’il avait occasionnés à Istanbul. Ce tremblement de terre a également été la première grande catastrophe naturelle après la conquête de Constantinople par l’Empire ottoman en 1453.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Turkish Terranes and Sutures and Its Implication for the Paleotectonic History of the Region
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Tectonophysics 451 (2008) 7–39 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto A new classification of the Turkish terranes and sutures and its implication for the paleotectonic history of the region ⁎ Patrice Moix a, , Laurent Beccaletto b, Heinz W. Kozur c, Cyril Hochard a, François Rosselet d, Gérard M. Stampfli a a Institut de Géologie et de Paléontologie, Université de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland b BRGM, Service GEOlogie / Géologie des Bassins Sédimentaires, 3 Av. Cl. Guillemin - BP 36009, FR-45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France c Rézsü u. 83, H-1029 Budapest, Hungary d IHS Energy, 24, chemin de la Mairie, CH-1258 Perly, Switzerland Received 15 October 2007; accepted 6 November 2007 Available online 14 December 2007 Abstract The Turkish part of the Tethyan realm is represented by a series of terranes juxtaposed through Alpine convergent movements and separated by complex suture zones. Different terranes can be defined and characterized by their dominant geological background. The Pontides domain represents a segment of the former active margin of Eurasia, where back-arc basins opened in the Triassic and separated the Sakarya terrane from neighbouring regions. Sakarya was re-accreted to Laurasia through the Balkanic mid-Cretaceous orogenic event that also affected the Rhodope and Strandja zones. The whole region from the Balkans to the Caucasus was then affected by a reversal of subduction and creation of a Late Cretaceous arc before collision with the Anatolian domain in the Eocene. If the Anatolian terrane underwent an evolution similar to Sakarya during the Late Paleozoic and Early Triassic times, both terranes had a diverging history during and after the Eo-Cimmerian collision.
    [Show full text]
  • Akinci Hepp Seismic Risk Assessment
    AKINCI HEPP SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT 17 April 2008 SİAL YERBİLİMLERİ ETÜT VE MÜŞAVİRLİK LTD.ŞTİ. Farabi Sokak 7/3 06680 Kavaklıdere – ANKARA Tel: (312) 427 30 43 – 467 66 73 Fax: (312) 467 96 58 e-mail: [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE PROJE AKINCI HEPP-SEISMIC RİSK ASSESSMENT HAZIRLAYAN Sial Yerbilimleri Etüt ve Müşavirlik Ltd. Farabi Sokak No:7/3 06680 Kavaklıdere / ANKARA Telephone : (0312) 427 30 43 – 467 66 73 Fax : (0312) 467 96 58 E-mail : [email protected] İŞVEREN ETİ ELEKTRİK PROJE NO - TARİH 15.04.2008 PROJE EKİBİ Cengiz Kaptan, Orhan Şimşek REVİZYON Final Prepared By Checked By Approved By Name Name Name Final C. Kaptan O. Şimşek Sign Sign Sign Date 15. 04. 2008 Name Name Name Sign Sign Sign Date Name Name Name Date Sign Sign Sign i Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE................................................................... 3 2 SEISMOTECTONIC CHARACTERISTICS OF TURKEY ................................ 3 3 SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 9 3.1 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 9 3. 2. Theoretical Basis ............................................................................................ 15 4 SOURCES OF EARTHQUAKES ................................................................... 16 5 ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIP AND DETERMINISTIC EVALUTION....... 17 6 EARTHQUAKES THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN THE REGIO ....................... 18 7 DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN EARTHQUAKE
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival
    Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2019 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival Ülker Sözen1 Netherlands Institute in Turkey This article analyzes the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival organized by the people of Dersim, an eastern province of Turkey, as a site of political activism, cultural reproduction, and intra-group contestation. The festival began as a group- remaking event for restoring cultural identity, defending locality, and mobilizing Dersimli people in the face of political repression. In time, socio-spatial and political fragmentation within Dersimli society became more prevalent. The festival experience came to reflect and contribute to the debates and anxieties about identity whereby different political groups competed to increase their influence over local politics as well as the event itself. On the one hand, this article discusses the organization of the Munzur Festival, its historical trajectory, and the accompanying public debates and criticisms. On the other, it explores festive sociabilities, cultural performances, and the circulation of politically-charged symbols throughout the event which showcases the articulation and competition of multiple ethno-political belongings which are the Dersimli, Kurdish, Alevi, and socialist ones. The festival’s historical trajectory is dealt as two stages, unified struggle and internal strife, whereby the festival appeared as first a group-remaking then unmaking public event. The paper argues that this transformation is tied to hanging power relations in the local politics of Dersim, and the shifting state policies, namely the phase of repressive control strategies until the mid-2000s and the peace process and political relaxation until 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Circular 1193
    FOLD BLEED BLEED BLEED BLEED U.S. Geological Survey Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the United States from the — Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the U.S. from Kocaeli, of August 17, 1999 T urkey , Earthquake — U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1 U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1193 193 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey BLEED BLEED BLEED FOLD BLEED FOLD BLEED BLEED Cover: Damage in Korfez, Turkey, following the August 17 Kocaeli earthquake. Photograph by Charles Mueller Cover design by Carol A. Quesenberry Field investigations were coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Institute of Standards and Technology BLEED BLEED FOLD FOLD BLEED BLEED Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 By U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1193 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey BLEED FOLD BLEED FOLD BLEED BLEED BLEED BLEED U.S. Department of the Interior Contributors Bruce Babbitt, Secretary Thomas L. Holzer, Scientific Editor, U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Aykut A. Barka, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey Charles G. Groat, Director David Carver, U.S. Geological Survey Mehmet Çelebi, U.S. Geological Survey Edward Cranswick, U.S. Geological Survey Timothy Dawson, San Diego State University and Southern California Earthquake Center James H. Dieterich, U.S. Geological Survey William L. Ellsworth, U.S. Geological Survey Thomas Fumal, U.S. Geological Survey John L. Gross, National Institute of Standards and Technology Robert Langridge, U.S.
    [Show full text]