Action Plan 2016-21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Action Plan 2016-21 ACTION PLAN 2016-21 1 VISION Kei te ora te wai, kei te ora te whenua, kei te ora te tangata If the water is healthy, the land and the people are nourished GOALS Our goal is to improve the Manawatū River, the mauri (lifeforce) of the Manawatū River Catchment such that it sustains fish species and is suitable for contact recreation, in balance with the social, cultural and economic activities of the catchment community. This goal represents a community opportunity to develop leadership in catchment improvement and capture the social and economic benefits of such leadership. 1. The Manawatū River becomes a source of 3. The Manawatū Catchment and waterways regional pride and mana. are returned to a healthy condition. 2. Waterways in the Manawatū Catchment are 4. Sustainable use of the land and water safe, accessible, swimmable* and provide resources of the Manawatū Catchment good recreation and food resources. continues to underpin the economic prosperity of the Region. *Noting that some parts of the catchment by their nature are not safe for swimming. Background The first Action Plan was launched by As part of achieving these goals, leaders committed to WHO’S INVOLVED? the Manawatū River Leaders’ Forum in developing their first Action Plan made up of over July 2011 and led to a significant amount 130 actions. The Manawatū River Leaders’ Accord unites 34 diverse of collaborative effort right across the A significant amount of work was carried out under signatories representing a wide range of stakeholder organisations including: Iwi/hapū, local and central Catchment. This revised Plan aims to build the first Action Plan in both rural and urban areas. $5.2 million worth of funding from Central Government’s government, Massey University, major industry, farming, on that effort to further improve our river as Fresh Start for Freshwater Clean-Up Fund added environmental and recreational advocacy groups. These we look ahead to the year 2021. impetus to a suite of eight projects and a total of over signatories are collectively known as the Manawatū The Manawatū River Leaders’ Accord was signed in $30 million has been invested by all parties to date. River Leaders’ Forum. August 2010 when key Iwi/hapū, industry, farming, This second iteration of the Action Plan aims to refresh The Forum was originally brought together by environmental and council representatives from around and refocus efforts to improve the Manawatū River and Horizons Regional Council and is now facilitated by the Manawatū River Catchment came together to Catchment. It sets out the science, the process, the an independent chairperson. Members meet at least publicly pledge their commitment to the good health actions put forward by signatories and how you can get twice a year to report on progress, share ideas, discuss of the River as the Manawatū River Leaders’ Forum. involved in the journey. concerns and build relationships to benefit the River It marked a significant turning point in freshwater and Catchment. Since the Accord was signed in 2010, a management as the parties moved from apportioning number of new parties have sought a seat at the Forum blame to agreeing that there was a water quality issue table. Dairy NZ, Beef + Lamb NZ, Environment Network and a need for collaborative solutions. The Accord set a Manawatū and the Save our River Trust are all now clear vision and goals for the River. actively involved as part of collaborative efforts. dateOur journey to 1 Apiti Kimbolton POHANGINA Action points O¯ ROUA MANAWATU¯ RIVER BEGINS HERE Cheltenham Dannevirke REDUCE THE NUTRIENT REDUCE THE IMPACT OF PROTECT AREAS OF Feilding AND BACTERIA FLOOD CONTROL AND HABITAT FOR NATIVE UPPER MANAWATU¯ FROM POINT SOURCE DRAINAGE SCHEMES FISH, BIRDS AND TROUT Bunnythorpe DISCHARGES Rongotea Ashhurst MIDDLE MANAWATU¯ Woodville Palmerston North REDUCE SEDIMENT REDUCE THE RUN-OFF OF INCREASE AWARENESS LOWER MANAWATU¯ RUN-OFF FROM EROSION SEDIMENT, NUTRIENTS OF THE CHALLENGES PRONE FARMLAND, THE AND BACTERIA FROM FACED BY FRESHWATER Mangatainoka RURAL ROAD NETWORK, INTENSIVE LAND-USE AND ACTIONS THE AND AREAS OF MAJOR SUCH AS DAIRYING AND COMMUNITY CAN TAKE Pahiatua Foxton Tokomaru EARTHWORKS CROPPING UPPER GORGE COASTAL MANAWATU¯ - HOROWHENUA Shannon PREVENT OVER-USE OF WATER TI¯RAUMEA Levin Eketahuna MANGATAINOKA WHAT’S HAPPENING AND WHERE Apiti The Manawatū Catchment is broken down Kimbolton into nine areas that we call sub-catchments. POHANGINA ¯ This map outlines these sub-catchments and OROUA MANAWATU¯ RIVER provides an indication of work planned for BEGINS HERE each area. Cheltenham Dannevirke Feilding UPPER MANAWATU¯ Bunnythorpe Rongotea Ashhurst MIDDLE MANAWATU¯ Woodville Palmerston North LOWER MANAWATU¯ Mangatainoka Pahiatua Foxton Tokomaru UPPER GORGE COASTAL MANAWATU¯ - HOROWHENUA Shannon TI¯RAUMEA Levin Eketahuna MANGATAINOKA Contents 1 Background 3 Our Journey 4 A Snapshot of the Catchment 6 The Review Process 8 The Science Monitoring Water Quality Key Issues in the Catchment 12 Key Actions and Activities 20 Tasks to Support Accord Goals 21 Action List 44 Voluntary Actions vs. Business as Usual 45 Join the Journey 46 Our Commitment 2 OUR JOURNEY TO DATE FEB 2010 FEB 2012 MAR 2012 JUL 2012 SEP 2012 First AUG 2010 Release Leaders’ Hui ā-iwi First meeting of first Forum Forum round of of the progress receive established Manawatū Manawatū River report $5.2 million to River Community Leaders’ Forum accelerate clean-up Grants Manawatū River effort, matched by Leaders’ Accord $25 million locally signed JUL 2011 FEB 2013 JUL 2011 Horizons One introduces FEB 2014 of NZ’s new Manawatū Action Plan MAR 2014 largest River Accord rate launched Upgrades inanga spawning 98 Environmental underway at sites identified at Farm Plans wastewater Whirokino completed treatment plants under the Accord APR 2014 Publication of JUL 2013 comprehensive JUN 2013 science and progress River Accord 4,200 reports wins Green plants Ribbon Award planted at AUG 2014 Manawatū River AUG 2014 source A number 208km of of native fencing fish and installed whitebait habitat SEP 2014 and 66,240 plants restoration planted as part of projects completed under Clean-up NOV 2014 NIWA and Clean-up Fund Fund Horizons Oroua River, Regional a tributary Council undertake to the fish passage trial 2020+ Manawatū, at Upper Kingston receives NZ River Road Award for second Waterways are safe, accessible and provide most improved in for recreation and food sources, sustainable the country land and water resources continue to underpin the Region’s economic prosperity. Waterways are returned to a healthy condition, the River becomes a source of regional pride and mana. MAR 2015 MAR 2015 DEC 2014 Clean- Meeting of Horizons up Fund Science and MAR 2016 Regional commits to Mātauranga Māori Council’s further community Advisory Panel 2nd iteration One Plan becomes involvement to inform revised of the Action operative projects Action Plan Plan released 3 A Snapshot of the Catchment The Manawatū Catchment, in the lower North Island Over the decades, the River and its catchment LAND USE KM2 of New Zealand, measures approximately 5,900 km2 have been extensively modified as a result of land or 590,000 ha. This equates to around 2.2% of New Sheep and/or Beef 3,426 clearance and development, discharges and flood Zealand. The River itself varies considerably along its and drainage control works. Unfortunately, an length depending on the geography and use of the Dairy 1,058 unintended consequence of this development has been land through which it flows. For example, in the upper degradation of the River’s water quality and native Native Cover 1,018 Manawatū sub-catchment land use is 69% sheep and flora and fauna. Some of these changes have been beef, 17% dairy and 13% forest (native and exotic) Exotic Cover 234 incremental as land has been developed and farmed; while land use in the coastal Manawatū-Horowhenua others have been almost instantaneous such as the sub-catchment at the bottom of the Catchment is 37% Built-up/Parks/Others 63 introduction of point source discharges. However, just sheep and beef, 36% dairy, 21% forest (native and as changes to the River’s make-up have evolved over Cropping 48 exotic) and 1% urban. The following table shows how time, efforts to mitigate the impact of development land is used across the catchment as a whole. Other 23 have also been evolving. There are no longer any farms that discharge dairy shed effluent to waterways and Water Body 14 upgrades are being made to reduce the impact of wastewater treatment plants across the Catchment. The Horticulture - Veg 11 Manawatū Catchment is now one of the most heavily Horticulture - Other 6 monitored and studied catchments in the country, allowing us to better understand and respond to the Dairy Run-off 4 challenges it faces. The original Action Plan identified nine sub-catchments. These are the: Upper Manawatū, Total 5,905 Tiraumea, Mangatainoka, Upper Gorge, Pohangina, Middle Manawatū, Lower Manawatū, Oroua, and Coastal Manawatū- Horowhenua. The specific challenges facing each of these sub-catchments can be further explored online at www.manawaturiver.co.nz 4 Mā rau ringa e oti ai! Through the collaboration of the many the project will be completed! MANAWATŪ • There are 321 native bush remnants in the Catchment. Of these, 11% are actively managed CATCHMENT FACTS: and 25% are legally protected. • If a new wetland or bush remnant site is discovered and the landowners are willing, the site is surveyed • 618 dairy sheds operate in the Manawatū using the rapid ecological assessment survey and Catchment and are inspected annually by Horizons some degree of active management may occur. New Regional Council. Inspections include an assessment sites are surveyed to prioritise work. of dairy effluent storage and discharge systems. The compliance rate for 2015 was 97%.
Recommended publications
  • The 1934 Pahiatua Earthquake Sequence: Analysis of Observational and Instrumental Data
    221 THE 1934 PAHIATUA EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE: ANALYSIS OF OBSERVATIONAL AND INSTRUMENTAL DATA Gaye Downes1' 2, David Dowrick1' 4, Euan Smith3' 4 and Kelvin Berryman1' 2 ABSTRACT Descriptive accounts and analysis of local seismograms establish that the epicentre of the 1934 March 5 M,7.6 earthquake, known as the Pahiatua earthquake, was nearer to Pongaroa than to Pahiatua. Conspicuous and severe damage (MM8) in the business centre of Pahiatua in the northern Wairarapa led early seismologists to name the earthquake after the town, but it has now been found that the highest intensities (MM9) occurred about 40 km to the east and southeast of Pahiatua, between Pongaroa and Bideford. Uncertainties in the location of the epicentre that have existed for sixty years are now resolved with the epicentre determined in this study lying midway between those calculated in the 1930' s by Hayes and Bullen. Damage and intensity summaries and a new isoseismal map, derived from extensive newspaper reports and from 1934 Dominion Observatory "felt reports", replace previous descriptions and isoseismal maps. A stable solution for the epicentre of the mainshock has been obtained by analysing phase arrivals read from surviving seismograms of the rather small and poorly equipped 1934 New Zealand network of twelve stations (two privately owned). The addition of some teleseismic P arrivals to this solution shifts the location of the epicentre by less than 10 km. It lies within, and to the northern end of, the MM9 isoseismal zone. Using local instrumental data larger aftershocks and other moderate magnitude earthquakes that occurred within 10 days and 50 km of the mainshock have also been located.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Region (Total Allocation) Cluster
    Additional Contribution to Base LSC FTTE Whole Remaining FTTE Total LSC for Education Region Resource (Travel Cluster Name School Name School Roll cluster FTTE based generated by FTTE by to be allocated the Cluster (A (Total Allocation) Time/Rural etc) on school roll cluster (A) school across cluster + B) (B) Avon School 64 0.13 Eltham School 150 0.30 Huiakama School 14 0.03 Makahu School 14 0.03 Marco School 17 0.03 Midhirst School 114 0.23 Ngaere School 148 0.30 Central Taranaki Community of Learning 4 3 0 4 Pembroke School 95 0.19 Rawhitiroa School 41 0.08 St Joseph's School (Stratford) 215 0.43 Stratford High School 495 0.99 1 Stratford Primary School 416 0.83 Taranaki Diocesan School (Stratford) 112 0.22 Toko School 129 0.26 Apiti School 30 0.06 Colyton School 103 0.21 Feilding High School 1,514 3.03 3 Feilding Intermediate 338 0.68 Halcombe Primary School 177 0.35 Hiwinui School 148 0.30 Kimbolton School 64 0.13 Feilding Kāhui Ako 8 4 0 8 Kiwitea School 67 0.13 Lytton Street School 563 1.13 1 Manchester Street School 383 0.77 Mount Biggs School 78 0.16 Taranaki/ Newbury School 155 0.31 Whanganui/ North Street School 258 0.52 Manawatu Waituna West School 57 0.11 Egmont Village School 150 0.30 Inglewood High School 383 0.77 Inglewood School 325 0.65 Kaimata School 107 0.21 Kāhui Ako o te Kōhanga Moa – Inglewood Community of Learning 2 2 0 2 Norfolk School 143 0.29 Ratapiko School 22 0.04 St Patrick's School (Inglewood) 81 0.16 Waitoriki School 29 0.06 Ashhurst School 432 0.86 Freyberg High School 1,116 2.23 2 Hokowhitu School 379
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Board of Inquiry Statement of Evidence Of
    BEFORE THE BOARD OF INQUIRY In the matter of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s146 of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider an application by Mighty River Power Limited for resource consents to construct and operate a Windfarm at Turitea STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF JAMES TALBOT BAINES Dated: 22nd May 2009 Contact: Andrew Brown Address: Council Chambers The Square Palmerston North Telephone: (06) 356 8199 Facsimile: (06) 355 4155 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Bio-data and experience .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Brief for this Social Impact Assessment ............................................................. 2 1.3 The proposal being assessed ............................................................................ 2 2 ASSESSMENT APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction and rationale ................................................................................... 3 2.2 Consultation coverage ....................................................................................... 4 2.3 Frameworks for assessment .............................................................................. 5 2.4 Sources of information ....................................................................................... 6 2.5 Citizens Panel Survey .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    NOTORNIS QUARTERLY JOURNAL of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand Volume Sixteen, Number Two, lune, 1969 NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS Contributions should be type-written, double- or treble-spaced, with a wide margin, on one side of the paper only. They should be addressed to the Editor, and are accepted o?, condition that sole publication is being offered in the first instance to Notornis." They should be concise, avoid repetition of facts already published, and should take full account of previous literature on the subject matter. The use of an appendix is recommended in certain cases where details and tables are preferably transferred out of the text. Long contributions should be provided with a brief summary at the start. Reprints: Twenty-five off-prints will be supplied free to authors, other than of Short Notes. When additional copies are required, these will be produced as reprints, and the whole number will be charged to the author by the printers. Arrangements for such reprints must be made directly between the author and the printers, Te Rau Press Ltd., P.O. Box 195, Gisborne, prior to publication. Tables: Lengthy and/or intricate tables will usually be reproduced photographically, so that every care should be taken that copy is correct in the first instance. The necessity to produce a second photographic plate could delay publication, and the author may be called upon to meet the additional cost. nlastrutions: Diagrams, etc., should be in Indian ink, preferably on tracing cloth, and the lines and lettering must be sufficiently bold to allow of reduction. Photographs must be suitable in shape to allow of reduction to 7" x 4", or 4" x 3f".
    [Show full text]
  • Ïg8g - 1Gg0 ISSN 0113-2S04
    MAF $outtr lsland *nanga spawning sur\feys, ïg8g - 1gg0 ISSN 0113-2s04 New Zealand tr'reshwater Fisheries Report No. 133 South Island inanga spawning surv€ys, 1988 - 1990 by M.J. Taylor A.R. Buckland* G.R. Kelly * Department of Conservation hivate Bag Hokitika Report to: Department of Conservation Freshwater Fisheries Centre MAF Fisheries Christchurch Servicing freshwater fisheries and aquaculture March L992 NEW ZEALAND F'RESTTWATER F'ISHERIES RBPORTS This report is one of a series issued by the Freshwater Fisheries Centre, MAF Fisheries. The series is issued under the following criteria: (1) Copies are issued free only to organisations which have commissioned the investigation reported on. They will be issued to other organisations on request. A schedule of reports and their costs is available from the librarian. (2) Organisations may apply to the librarian to be put on the mailing list to receive all reports as they are published. An invoice will be sent for each new publication. ., rsBN o-417-O8ffi4-7 Edited by: S.F. Davis The studies documented in this report have been funded by the Department of Conservation. MINISTBY OF AGRICULTUBE AND FISHERIES TE MANAlU AHUWHENUA AHUMOANA MAF Fisheries is the fisheries business group of the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. The name MAF Fisheries was formalised on I November 1989 and replaces MAFFish, which was established on 1 April 1987. It combines the functions of the t-ormer Fisheries Research and Fisheries Management Divisions, and the fisheries functions of the former Economics Division. T\e New Zealand Freshwater Fisheries Report series continues the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Environmental Report series.
    [Show full text]
  • Businessevents.Newzealand.Com Te Puia, Rotorua
    Te Puia, Rotorua businessevents.newzealand.com PULL-UP BANNERS Wellington newzealand.com AsCA CRYSTAL December - | Auckland, New Zealand Royal Wellington Golf Club Graeme Murray WELCOME TO AUCKLAND Viaduct Harbour, Auckland . HRS . HRS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE HRS HRS NORTH ASIA HRS MIDDLE EAST HRS INDIA HRS AGCSA SOUTH EAST ASIA SOUTH AMERICA HRS HRS AUSTRALIA HRS . HRS AUCKLAND NEW ZEALAND DISCOVER Oriental Bay, Wellington Rob Suisted Rob Wellington Oriental Bay, NEW ZEALAND Hobbiton, Waikato Sara Orme Sara Waikato Hobbiton, Julian Apse TM Wellington Harbour Wellington Jet Shotover River Shotover Bridge to Nowhere, Whanganui National Park Hobbiton Movie set, Waikato Bleed Area A4 BANNERS WellingtonMilford Sound, Fiordland DunedinMilford Sound, Fiordland newzealand.com newzealand.com ChristchurchMilford Sound, Fiordland WaitomoMilford Sound, Glowworm Fiordland Caves newzealand.com newzealand.com EMAIL NEWSLETTERS BEYOND THE OFFICIAL PROGRAMME Te Puia, Rotorua newzealand.com GETTING HERE EUROPE HRS NORTH ASIA HRS NORTH AMERICA Arthurs Point, Queenstown Te Puia, Rotorua Hobbiton™ Movie Set, Waikato HRS Hokitika Gorge, West Coast In New Zealand, you are never far from something incredible. SOUTH EAST SOUTH ASIA AMERICA There’s no better place for adventure, rejuvenation, or inspiration. HRS HRS AUSTRALIA HRS Expand your horizons beyond your conference programme AUCKLAND HRS and explore the amazing experiences on offer. NEW ZEALAND In a short span of travelling time, our diverse landscape changes from snowcapped mountains to golden beaches, bubbling geothermal pools and lush rainforests. Waiheke Island, Auckland New Zealand is the only place you’ll find unique Māori culture, Tongariro Alpine Crossing, Ruapehu Wellington from facing a haka (ancestral war challenge) to eating from a hāngī (traditional pit oven).
    [Show full text]
  • Received Land and Who Were Anxious to Get It
    Wai 2200, #H5 IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI 2200 WAI 113(A) UNDER The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER of the Porirua ki Manawatu Inquiry AND IN THE MATTER of a claim by Sir Edward Taihakurei Durie on behalf of Ngati Tahuriwakanui (Wai 113 A) THE RANGIMARIE NARRATIVE Emeritus Professor Sir Mason Durie, Hon Sir Edward Taihākurei Durie and Professor Meihana Durie Dated: 16 December 2019 Counsel Acting: WOODWARD LAW OFFICES PO Box 30411 LOWER HUTT Solicitors: Donna Hall, Johanna Guest Telephone: +64 (04) 560 3680 Email: [email protected] TO CHAIR AND MEMBERS Porirua ki Manawatū Inquiry WAITANGI TRIBUNAL The Rangimarie Narrative A statement by Emeritus Professor Sir Mason Durie, Hon Sir Edward Taihākurei Durie and Professor Meihana Durie of Ngāti Kauwhata and Rangitāne. PART A: INTRODUCTION Qualifications 1. This statement is made for Ngāti Tahuriwakanui hapū of Ngāti Kauwhata, in support of the claim on their behalf under Wai 113A.1 As will be shown, it is relevant to this statement that we are also members of Ngāti Te Rangitepaia, a hapū of Rangitāne.2 2. Our purpose is to give evidence and expert opinion in relation to two Native Land Court decisions of 1868 and 1869 respectively, by which various groups of Ngāti Raukawa (a confederation of hapū and iwi which includes Ngāti Kauwhata) were deprived of most of their Manawatū lands. This introduction has been compiled as Part A. Part B discusses the context for the decisions. Part C concerns the Courts’ findings. Part D reviews the Rangitāne lands on the lower Manawatū river at the time of settlement and Part E is a conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 3432 the NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No
    3432 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 187 58395 Robert, Louis Hilton, Motor Engineer, 149~ain~St.'East, 1P'58466~SutherIand, Ernest Taniwha, Farmer, Canterbury Aviation PalmerBton North. School, Sockburn, Christchurch. 58396'Roberts, John J., Farmer, Raumai. *58467 Rwainson, William, Seaman, care of Post-office, Shannon. 58397 Robertson, Charles, Assistant Wool.classer, 7 Rolleston St, 58468 Rwansson, Ernest Gustaf, Shearer, care of Post-office, Tai­ Palmerston North. hape. 58399 Robinson, John, Gardener, Te Aweawe St, Palmerston North. 58469 Sweeny, Timothy, Farmer, care of G. Price, Awapuni, Pal- 58400 Robinson, John William, Baker, Mill Rd, Otaki. merston North. 58401 Robinson, William Henry, Telegraph Cadet, Stratford. 58470 Tagg, Jonathan Henry Mason, Cheesemaker, Ashhurst. 58402 Robson, John, Flax Hand, Care of Mr. Guy, Tokomaru, 58471 Tansley, John Athol Lorenzo, Bank Clerk, Shannon. Mana.watu. 58472 Taylor, Alfrcd, Electrician, Arcadia, Feilding. 58403 Rodgers, Robert, Coachbuilder, c~re of Commercial Hotel, 58473 Taylor, Edgar York, Fireman, Rock Cottage, Boundary Rd. Raetihi. East, Palmerston North. 58404 Rolston, William Henry, Dairy.farmer, Kohitere, Weraroa. 58474 Taylor, Edward, Porter, Clarendon Hotel, Palmerston North. *58405 Roos, Edward, Engine·driver, 183 Ferguson St, Palmerston 58475 Taylor, Harold John, Dairy-farmer, Otaki Railwavs, Otaki. North. 58476 Teague, William John, Farmer, P.O. Box 4, Kauwhata, 58407 Ross, Alexander, Dairy·farmer, Ohutu. Palmerston North. 58408 Ross, Thomas Lawson, Basketmaker, 39 Alexandra St, 58477 Telford, John Degidon, Barman, Railway Hotel, Palmerston PalmerBton North. North. 58409 Rowlands, William Eric, Farm Hand, Tokomaru. 58478 Tester, Edward Charles, Painter, 36 George St, Palmerston 58410 Ruff, James Leonard, Bushfeller, care of Mrs. S. Ruff, North. Makino, Oroua. 58056 Thomas, David, Potato-grower, care of Cheltenham Hotel, 584Il Rush, Eustace Beale, Jockey, Awapuui, Palmerston North.
    [Show full text]
  • Feilding Manawatu Palmerston North City
    Mangaweka Adventure Company (G1) Rangiwahia Scenic Reserve (H2) Location: 143 Ruahine Road, Mangaweka. Phone: +64 6 382 5744 (See Manawatu Scenic Route) OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE Website: www.mangaweka.co.nz The best way to experience the mighty Rangitikei River is with these guys. Guided kayaking and rafting Robotic Dairy Farm Manawatu(F6) trips for all abilities are on offer, and the friendly crew will make sure you have an awesome time. Location: Bunnythorpe. Phone: +64 27 632 7451 Bookings preferred but not essential. Located less than 1km off State Highway 1! Website: www.robotfarmnz.wixsite.com/robotfarmnz Take a farm tour and watch the clever cows milk themselves in the amazing robotic milking machines, Mangaweka Campgrounds (G1) experience biological, pasture-based, free-range, sustainable, robotic farming. Bookings are essential. Location: 118 Ruahine Road, Mangaweka. Phone: +64 6 382 5744 Website: www.mangaweka.co.nz An idyllic spot for a fun Kiwi camp experience. There are lots of options available from here including The Coach House Museum (E5) rafting, kayaking, fishing, camping or just relaxing under the native trees. You can hire a cabin that Location: 121 South Street, Feilding. Phone: +64 6 323 6401 includes a full kitchen, private fire pit and wood-burning barbecue. Website: www.coachhousemuseum.org Discover the romance, hardships, innovation and spirit of the early Feilding and Manawatu pioneers Mangaweka Gallery and Homestay (G1) through their stories, photos and the various transportation methods they used, all on display in an Location: The Yellow Church, State Highway 1, Mangaweka. Phone: +64 6 382 5774 outstanding collection of rural New Zealand heritage, showcasing over 140 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • Manawatu Region AED Home Fields Location/Nearest AED St Matthews Collegiate Y St Matthews Collegiate St
    Manawatu Region AED Home Fields Location/Nearest AED St Matthews Collegiate Y St Matthews Collegiate St. Matthew's Collegiate School - Located in the main reception of Main House (Boarding Hostel) Hokowhitu AFC Y Hokowhitu Park Hokowhitu Bowling Club, white box in a doorway on the outside of the building. Massey FC Y Massey University Rec centre desk and security van Wairarapa College Y Wairarapa College Wairarapa College Hostel which is adjacent to all the school sports fields Longburn Adventist College Y Longburn Adventist College Lonburn Adventist College - Secure Cabinet - Outside Main Reception Nga Tawa Diocesan Y Nga Tawa Diocesan A the school, in the main block in pigeon hole area staff mailings, and then on countdown wall Horowhenua College Y Horowhenua College Horowhenua College main office St Peters College Y St Peters College St Peter's College - Sick Bay PNGHS Y Hokowhitu Park Hokowhitu Bowling Club, white box in a doorway on the outside of the building. Awatapu College Y Awatapu College Awatapu College - Administration Building - Main Office Feilding High School Y Feilding High School Feilding High School Pahiatua FC Y Bush Park Multisports Complex Bush Multisports Complex on Huxley St, Pahiatua Huntley School Y Huntley School Huntley School - Staff Room Tararua College N Tararua College Bush Multisports Complex on Huxley St, Pahiatua Palmerston North Marist N Skoglund Park Freyberg Community Pool Takaro FC N Monrad Bowling club at Takaro club rooms, Z Pioneer Highway for Monrad park Freyberg High School N Freyberg High School
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Quaternary Geomorphology of the Lower Manawatu
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. THE LATE QUATERNARY GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE LOWER MANAWATU A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Geography at Massey University by PATRICK ALAN HESP 1975 ABSTRACT The geomorphology of the present Lower Manawa tu floodplain and the valleys that exit at the margin of the floodplain, is presented. An introduction to the geology and geomorphology of the study area is given, and previous studies are reported where relevant. Two types of tributary valleys have been recognised in the study area. These valleys have been cut into the Tokomaru Marine Terrace. The first type recognised are predominantly gravel-floored, box-shaped valleys with headwaters in the Tararua Ranges. The second and major type recognised are box-shaped valleys without gravel floors. The first type have been formed by normal fluvial processes, while the second type were originally V-shaped, and have been infilled by estuarine sedimentation processes. The latter occurred as a direct result of the Flandrian Transgression. The morphology of the Tokoma ru Marine Terrace margin is examined, and it is concluded that the margin is predominantly river-cut. The Manawatu floodplain was originally an estuary. As the Flandrian Transgression began the lower reaches of the Manawatu and eventually the Oroua Rivers were drowned. As the Transgression progressed, the Lower Manawatu became an estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Application and Evaluation of Sediment Fingerprinting Techniques in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Application and Evaluation of Sediment Fingerprinting Techniques in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Simon Vale 2016 ii Abstract Suspended sediment is an important component of the fluvial environment, contributing not only to the physical form, but also the chemical and ecological character of river channels and adjacent floodplains. Fluvial sediment flux reflects erosion of the contributing catchment, which when enhanced can lead to a reduction in agricultural productivity, effect morphological changes in the riparian environment and alter aquatic ecosystems by elevating turbidity levels and degrading water quality. It is therefore important to identify catchment-scale erosion processes and understand rates of sediment delivery, transport and deposition into the fluvial system to be able to mitigate such adverse effects. Sediment fingerprinting is a well-used tool for evaluating sediment sources, capable of directly quantifying sediment supply through differentiating sediment sources based on their inherent geochemical signatures and statistical modelling. Confluence-based sediment fingerprinting has achieved broad scale geochemical discrimination within the 5870 km2 Manawatu catchment, which drains terrain comprising soft-rock Tertiary and Quaternary sandstones, mudstones, limestones and more indurated greywacke. Multiple sediment samples were taken upstream and downstream of major river confluences, sieved to < 63 μm and analysed through step-wise discrimination, principle component analysis and a range of geochemical indicators to investigate and identify the sub- catchment geochemical signatures.
    [Show full text]