DOCSLIB.ORG

Redlands Municipal Airport Business Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redlands Municipal Airport Business Plan Redlands Municipal Airport Business Plan Final Technical Report Prepared for: City of Redlands, California Prepared by: R.A. Wiedemann & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 621 ! Georgetown, KY 40324 ! (502) 535-6570 ! FAX (502) 535-5314 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMAY ......................................................................................................... E-1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Understanding & Key Issues ............................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Desired End Products ........................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Report Outline ...................................................................................................... 1-4 SECTION 2: AIRPORT MISSION AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 2.1 Current Airport Mission ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Airport Accounting and Business Practices ......................................................... 2-2 2.3 Current Airport Management Structure ............................................................... 2-4 2.4 Summary and Preliminary Observations ............................................................. 2-8 SECTION 3: EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS 3.1 Airport Location................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Demographic Characteristics ............................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Airport Facilities .................................................................................................. 3-3 3.4 Competitive Market Assessment ......................................................................... 3-8 SECTION 4: BASELINE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS 4.1 Historical Revenues ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Historical Expenses .............................................................................................. 4-4 4.3 Baseline Forecast of Operating Revenues and Expenses .................................... 4-7 4.4 Non-Operating Expenses ................................................................................... 4-10 SECTION 5: BUSINESS PLAN ALTERNATIVES 5.1 Airport Branding .................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Flight School/University or College Partnering .................................................. 5-4 5.3 Hangar Development ........................................................................................... 5-5 5.4 Airport Events ..................................................................................................... 5-7 5.5 Attraction SASOs and Aviation Support Businesses .......................................... 5-9 5.6 Increased Business Aviation Use ...................................................................... 5-11 5.7 Non-Aviation Land Development..................................................................... 5-12 5.8 Rates and Charges Adjustments ........................................................................ 5-14 5.9 Fuel Sales by City ............................................................................................. 5-15 5.10 Summary Impact of Revenue Enhancement Strategies on Potential Demand . 5-16 SECTION 6: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Recommended Administrative and Policy Actions ............................................. 6-1 6.2 Revenue Enhancement Recommendations ........................................................ 6-11 6.3 Impact on Revenues and Expenses ................................................................... 6-23 6.4 Summary Recommendations ............................................................................. 6-28 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) SECTION 7: AIRPORT COMMUNITY VALUE 7.1 Economic Activity Generated By REI ................................................................. 7-1 7.2 Existing Value of Airport Property and Facilities ............................................... 7-3 7.3 Summary of Airport Community Value .............................................................. 7-6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 – Airport Organization Chart ......................................................................... 2-5 Figure 3-1 – Airport Location and Service Area ............................................................. 3-1 Figure 3-2 – Existing Airport Layout .............................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-3 – Landside Buildings...................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 4-1 – Historical Operating Revenues by Category ............................................... 4-3 Figure 4-2 – Comparison of Historical Operating Revenue Category Splits .................. 4-4 Figure 4-3 – Historical Operating Expenses by Category. .............................................. 4-6 Figure 4-4 – Percentage Shifts in Operating Expenses .................................................... 4-6 Figure 5-1 – Potential Solar Farm Locations ................................................................. 5-14 Figure 5-3 – Impact of Revenue Enhancement Strategies on Potential GA Demand ... 5-16 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 – Historical Population Trends ........................................................................ 3-2 Table 3-2 – Historical Per Capita Personal Income Trends ............................................. 3-2 Table 3-3 – Redlands Municipal Airport Runway Data .................................................. 3-4 Table 3-4 – REI Landside Building Inventory ................................................................ 3-6 Table 3-5 – Facility Comparison ................................................................................... 3-11 Table 3-6 – Services Comparison .................................................................................. 3-12 Table 3-7 – Rates and Charges Comparison .................................................................. 3-13 Table 4-1 – Historical Revenues ...................................................................................... 4-2 Table 4-2 – Rental Income: 2011-2015 ........................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-3 – Historical Expenses ...................................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-4 – Comparison of Operating Revenues & Expenses ........................................ 4-6 Table 4-5 – Baseline Forecast of Operating Revenues and Expenses ............................. 4-9 Table 4-6 – Grants and Capital Spending ...................................................................... 4-10 Table 4-7 – Airport Historical Debt Payments .............................................................. 4-10 Table 4-8 – Baseline Net Deficit ................................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-9 – Airport Net Revenues at Lower Debt Payment .......................................... 4-11 Table 4-10 – Redlands Municipal Airport ACIP ........................................................... 4-12 Table 5-1 – County Hangar Development Model ............................................................ 5-7 Table 5-2 – Private Development of Hangars .................................................................. 5-7 Table 5-3 – Impact of Revenue Enhancement Strategies on Potential GA Demand ..... 5-16 Table 6-1 – Conventional Hangar Breakeven with FAA Grant .................................... 6-15 Table 6-2 – Ten Unit T-Hangar Breakeven with FAA Grant ........................................ 6-15 Table 6-3 – Private Development of Hangars ................................................................ 6-16 Table 6-4 – Recommended Plan .................................................................................... 6-24 Table 6-5 – Recommended Plan Net Revenue (Deficit) ............................................... 6-25 Table 6-6 – Recommended Plan Non-Operating Expenses ........................................... 6-26 Table 7-1 – Direct and Induced Economic Impacts: Redlands Municipal Airport ......... 7-3 Table 7-2 – Redlands Municipal Airport Replacement Value ......................................... 7-4 Table 7-3 – Depreciated/Existing Airport Value ............................................................. 7-5 APPENDIX Appendix 2A – City Council Airport Responsibilities ................................................. 2A-1 Appendix 3A – SWOT Analysis................................................................................... 3A-1 Appendix 3B – Airport Lease Analysis .........................................................................3B-1 Appendix 3C – Survey of Airport Users & Businesses .................................................3C-1 Appendix 4A – Trend Lines vs. Baselines .................................................................... 4A-1 Redlands Municipal Airport Business Plan May 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Redlands Municipal Airport (REI) Business Plan HE PURPOSE OF THIS BUSINESS PLAN FOR REI (Business Plan) is to assess potential means to improve the Airport’s financial performance, economic development, and operation. To T do this, a number of potential operational and development scenarios were evaluated, providing the City of Redlands with decision-making information. The Plan is founded upon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airport Land Use Commission Riverside County
    AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY Riverside County Administration Center 4080 Lemon St., Board Room (14th Floor) Riverside, California Thursday, 9:00 a.m., March 20, 2003 I. CALL TO ORDER II. SALUTE TO THE FLAG III. ROLL CALL – INTRODUCTIONS {NOTE: If you wish to speak, please complete a “SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION FORM” and give it to the Secretary. The purpose of the public hearing is to allow interested parties to express their concerns. Please do not repeat information already given. If you have no additional information, but wish to be on record, simply give your name and address, and state that you agree with the previous speaker(s)} IV. APPROVE OF MINUTES FOR January 23, 2003 and February 20, 2003 V. OLD BUSINESS REGIONAL WIDE 9:00 A.M. A. RG-02-100 – Riverside County – 2002 Riverside County General Plan (General Plan), Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 618 and Environmental Impact Report No. 441 (SCH# 2002051143). The General Plan is the comprehensive planning document that provides guidelines for growth and land-use related decisions made by the County, expresses the community’s goals with respect to both the human-made and natural environment, and sets forth the policies and implementation measures to ensure the safety and welfare of those who live, work, and do business in Riverside County. General Plan area plans which would be affected by airports under ALUC jurisdiction include: Desert Center; Eastern Coachella Valley; Eastvale; Harvest Valley/Winchester; Jurupa; Lake Elsinore; Mead Valley; Palo Verde Valley; San Jacinto Valley; Southwest; Temescal Canyon; The Pass; and Western Coachella Valley Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessor Book Boundaries National Parks : 1178 O § 1242 E ¦¨ GRAN S N 0322 D D AVE
    LEY S L P A Y E V INYO COUNTY R A S P R I E INYO COUNTY T20NR10E Jupiter Pioneer Copper Y Point of Point Queen N Mine Rocks L D Rob Roy Acme Omega Canyon A T20NR01E 0512 Mine H (historical) T20NR08E R Smith Mine Beck Kingston # Standard T20NR02E T20NR06E Sperry Rogers Mine Range Blackwater # T20NR11E 0485 # L T20NR03E T20NR05E T20NR07E Hills Western Spring Mine Excelsior A S # Mine Monarch I T19NR09EN Mine T20NR09E Number Two Red Hill # L # Talc Mine O # Mine T20NR04E Pleasanton Mine # # Horse N Mine # T25SR40E Searles L # F # Thief # Snow N L M#ine # I # T T19NR06EN Springs # Long S T19NR07EN T19NR08EN White I I Valley # #Moorehouse # U T Valley E #Mine Acme L E Mine Alexander Tecopa# Q E A Mine # G E Hills Pass S A Trona A# BootAh N Kingston # # Mine T25SR41E Trona Y S # Alexander A E T L C R T19NR12E V M V o L #Mine Cub Lee s # N t M Well N T25SR43E T25SR44E R T25SR46E A L O Argus T25SR45E T25SR47E L I T Argus Tank a S A # Sandora k # T19NR13E U Canyon I T19NR08EE T25SR42E A Mine G e H G Wingate S Sperry N Borosolvay # Pass I N N O # K K Virginia Lake N I L N # China # Sand View # Old Ibex T19NR10E 0486 Canyon Ann Mine Owlshead AT19NR03E Ibex A D U M O N T Mine O T19NR04E T Wash Pass T19NR06E H I L L S Lake M E # Mountains T Kingston D T L Ponga E T19NR09E Peak T19NR11E Mesquite E China # T19NR02E N L G # S # T19NR07E T19NR08E Crystal # # Mine P Valley N S South N T19NR05E Mesquite L I U O Lake Trona New York Mine Hills Owl Lake # # Mountains # TA 0520 E Rabbit Mesquite R O T Colorado N # SISKIYOU Searles E U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS – Appendix R1, Data Supporting Volume
    Appendix R1.22 Public Safety and Services This appendix includes 5 tables that present airports, fire stations, police stations, landfills and schools within the Plan Area. Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R1.22. PUBLIC SAFETY AND SERVICES Appendix R1.22 Public Safety and Services Table R1.22-1 Airports Within and Near the Plan Area Map Key Airport Airport Land use Compatibility Plan 1 Agua Dulce Airpark 2 Apple Valley Town of Apple Valley Airport Comprehensive Land Use Compatibility Plan. Prepared by the Town of Apple Valley. March 1995. 3 Avi Suquilla 4 Banning Municipal 5 Barstow-Daggett Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Barstow-Daggett Airport. San Bernardino County. May 1992. 6 Bermuda Dunes 7 Big Bear City Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Big Bear City Airport. San Bernardino County. February 1992. 8 Bishop 9 Blythe 10 Brawley Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Imperial County Airports. Imperial County Airport Land Use Commission. June 1996. 11 Cable Cable Airport Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan. West Valley Planning Agency Airport Land Use Commission. December 9, 1981. 12 Calexico International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Imperial County Airports. Imperial County Airport Land Use Commission. June 1996. 13 General WM J Fox Airfield 14 Hesperia Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Hesperia Airport. San Bernardino County Airport Land Use Commission. Prepared by Ray A. Vidal Aviation Planning Consultant. January 1991. 15 Imperial County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Imperial County Airports. Imperial County Airport Land Use Commission. June 1996. 16 Inyokern (Kern County) Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. County of Kern. March 29, 2011. 17 Lake Havasu City 18 Laughlin Bullhead International 19 Mojave (Kern County) Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Appraisal of French Valley Aviation, Inc
    SUMMARY APPRAISAL OF FRENCH VALLEY AVIATION, INC. FIXED BASE OPERATION 37552 WINCHESTER ROAD, BUILDING #4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA 92563 Prepared For Ms. Karen Vincent County of Riverside Economic Development Agency By Donald Falk CA Certificate # AG017342 May 1, 2011 June 3, 2011 Ms. Karen Vincent County of Riverside Economic Development Agency P.O. Box 1180 Riverside, CA 92502 Dear Ms. Vincent: As you requested, I have inspected the French Valley Aviation fixed base aircraft maintenance and storage hangar, which is located on the west side of the French Valley Airport taxiway at 37552 Winchester Road (Building 4) in Riverside County, California 92563. In addition, I have prepared a summary appraisal of the subject property in an as is status. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property's leased fee estate as of May 1, 2011, subject the limiting conditions and assumptions outlined in this appraisal report. The property is legally described at Exhibit A in the report. Pertinent information utilized in arriving at a value conclusion is contained in my appraisal files and the body of this report, which contains 59 pages and three exhibits. This summary appraisal is prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), all State Fish and Game, Wildlife Conservation Board, Federal Fish and Wildlife Service guidelines, including any other applicable County, State, and/or Federal regulations and guidelines, and/or any other applicable statutes for appraisal reports.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA RUNWAY SAFETY FAA.Gov/Runwaysafety
    FAA RUNWAY SAFETY FAA.gov/runwaysafety By increasing awareness of the challenges pilots face, we can reduce the likelihood of runway incursions and keep the NAS the safest aviation system in the world. Scan the QR Code or follow the link to watch each video. Van Nuys VNY https://goo.gl/w32UJy Van Nuys Airport in Southern California is a general aviation facility and is one of the 50 busiest airports in the nation. This video details some of the surface safety risks encountered at VNY, including minimal space between parallel runways, line up and wait, wrong runway operations and helicopter/fixed wing operations. Chino CNO https://goo.gl/4TCi8i Chino Airport in Southern California is a general aviation facility with a diverse mix of trac and pilot experience. This video details some of the surface safety risks at CNO including runway incursion hotspots, wrong runway operations and flight training operations. John Wayne SNA https://goo.gl/qpn0qR John Wayne Airport Orange County in Southern California is a commercial and general aviation facility and is one of the nation’s 50 busiest airports. This video details some of the surface safety risks encountered at SNA, including runway exiting, runway incursion hotspots and helicopter/fixed wing operations. RUNWAY SAFETY MATERIAL & LINKS FAA Western-Pacific Regional Runway Safety Team, Updated 1/30/2017 FAA RUNWAY SAFETY SOURCES FAASTeam http://www.faasafety.gov Runway Safety http://www.faa.gov/go/runwaysafety Airport Safety http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/ FAA Runway Safety Group Email
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: Corona, CA Accident Number: LAX05FA041 Date & Time: 11/25/2004, 1434 PST Registration: N747JU Aircraft: Cessna 411 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 2 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis The multiengine airplane impacted terrain shortly after departing from the airport. The airplane began the initial climb after liftoff and initially maintained a track along the extended runway centerline. Witnesses indicated that about 1 mile into the initial climb, the aircraft began to make erratic yawing maneuvers and the engines began to emit smoke. The airplane rolled to the left and dove toward the ground, erupting into fire upon impact. Prior to the accident, the pilot had reportedly been having mechanical problems with the fuel tank bladder installations and had attempted to install new ones. He was performing his own maintenance on the airplane in an attempt to rectify the problem. The day before the accident, the pilot told his hangar mate that he took the airplane on a test flight and experienced mechanical problems with an engine. Neither the nature of the engine problems nor the actions to resolve the discrepancies could be determined. On site examination of the thermally destroyed wreckage disclosed evidence consistent with the right engine producing significantly more power than the left engine at ground impact. The extent of the thermal destruction precluded any determination regarding the fuel selector positions, the positions for the boost pump switches, or the fuel tanks/lines. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: A loss of engine(s) power for undetermined reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Redlands Airport Association Newsletter
    Redlands Airport Association City of redlands Newsletter 12-31-20 Volume 7, Issue 4 Chapter of California Pilots Association The Mission of the RAA • To advocate for all users Observations & Comments of REI. • To promote, support, and encourage the By RAA President Ted Gablin continued use of REI. • To communicate the airport’s importance to I, like most of us, am looking forward to putting 2020 in the rear-view mirror. I am the community. thankful no one in my family has had Covid except maybe me. Unfortunately, my dad has been locked up in a senior facility in Florida, like many other seniors, with limited • To educate airport users of relevant regulatory social contact and with restrictions on family visits. We know this was done for his and legislative protection, but at 94, it’s been difficult for him and the rest of the family. airport/aviation matters. There are a few folks in our little REI village that have gotten ill from the virus and • To provide a forum whereby those others have suffered job related economic impacts from the pandemic. Others have concerned about REI been fortunate enough to continue flying activities. issues can voice their concerns. The RAA and EAA had to cancel all planned events this year. There were no Young Eagles flights, no pancake breakfasts, spot landing or flour bombing contests. The EAA • To advise the appropriate authorities cancelled their holiday party. The RAA started to plan a holiday party, but it too fell regarding safety, victim to the pandemic. It’s too bad as these events get kids interested in aviation, get security, and other the community to the airport, and gets our airport community together for good times.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Black Diamond Tavern
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM BLACK DIAMOND TAVERN 42172 MOONRIDGE ROAD, BIG BEAR LAKE BLACK DIAMOND TAVERN BIG BEAR LAKE, CALIFORNIA NON-ENDORSEMENT & DISCLAIMER NOTICE CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Marcus & Millichap. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB's or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant's plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. The information contained in this Marketing Brochure has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, Marcus & Millichap has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has Marcus & Millichap conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TRA-1 the Purpose of The
    7 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The purpose of the Transportation Element is to demonstrate how people and goods will move through the City. The transportation system should support travel within Chino and connect to regional transportation options, reduce the impacts of transportation on the region’s environment, and provide a variety of options so individuals can choose to travel by car, bicycle, foot, or public transportation. This Element balances the need to provide efficient and reliable ways to move people and goods by multiple transportation modes and routes. These qualities of the transportation system indicate the important link between transportation and pub- lic health. They support Chino’s vision of remaining a safe, attractive community that provides opportunities for healthy, active lifestyles, with walkable neighbor- hoods, vibrant retail districts, and economically strong employment areas. Many of the goals, objectives, policies, and actions in this Element were referenced in Chap- ter 3, A Healthy City, as they support healthy means of travel, reduced air pollution, and strong connections between people in the community. Transportation policies are key to meeting Statewide goals for reduction of green- house gas (GHG) emissions. Many of the goals, objectives, policies, and actions in this Element will help Chino contribute to reduced GHG emissions, primarily through reductions in vehicle miles traveled (VMT), shifting toward pedestrian, bicycle, and transit travel, and alternative vehicle technologies. The Transportation Element is correlated with the Land Use Element. As required by Government Code Section 65302(b), this Element contains information on the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, trans- portation routes, and terminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Miller/Pine Tree Rv Park
    LAND USE SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: September 3, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #2 Project Description Vicinity Map APN: 0304-412-06 Applicant: DON MILLER/PINE TREE RV PARK Community/ BIG BEAR CITY Supervisori 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT al District: Location: 42144 NORTH SHORE DRIVE (HWY 38) IN THE COMMUNITY OF BIG BEAR CITY Project No: P201800679 Staff: ANTHONY DELUCA Rep: DON MILLER Proposal: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) TO ADD THIRTY-TWO (32) 30' X 40' SPACES TO AN EXISTING RV PARK ON 4.6-ACRES IN THE COMMUNITY OF BIG BEAR CITY WITHIN THE BEAR VALLEY PLANNING AREA 6 Hearing Notices Sent On: August 23, 2020 Report Prepared By: Anthony DeLuca SITE INFORMATION Parcel Size: 4.6 Acres Terrain: Mountainous, sloping upwards from south to north Vegetation: Mountain vegetation and pines. Partially Developed/Disturbed. SURROUNDING LAND DESCRIPTION: AREA EXISTING LAND USE LAND USE ZONING DISTRICT Site Mobile Home/RV Park Bear Valley/Single Family Residential (BV/RS) North Vacant Land/Federal Bear Valley/Resource Conservation (BV/RC) South Vacant Land/SFRs Bear Valley/Single Family Residential (BV/RS) East Religious Facility Bear Valley/Single Family Residential (BV/RS) West SB County Maintenance Yard Bear Valley/Single Family Residential (BV/RS) AGENCY COMMENT City Sphere of Influence: N/A N/A Water Service: City of Big Bear Lake DWP Available Sewer Service: County Special Districts Water and Sanitation Available STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration, ADOPT the Findings as contained in the Staff Report, APPROVE the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and DIRECT staff to file a Notice of Determination1.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Overview and Updates
    Office of Technical Services and Programs Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Program Overview and Updates Sept 14, 2018 Association of California Airports Conference Lake Tahoe, CA Program Overview and Updates Grants and Loan Program State Capital Improvement Plan California Airport Pavement Management System California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP) Annual Credits: $10,000/year to GA airports ($1.49 million) – 100% State funded grant Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Matching Grants– Up to 5% of an FAA AIP Grant* Acquisition and Development (A&D) Grants – 90% State funded safety, pavement preservation projects, and Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan projects (requires a 10% local match)* * Construction cannot start prior to grant approval AIP Match Funding • FY 2016-17 - $1.4M awarded to 48 projects • FY 2017-18 - $1.1M awarded to 28 projects • FY 2018-19 - $1.4M Capacity (grant cap maximum set at $50K) A&D Funding • FY 2016-17 - $1.1M awarded toward 4 projects • FY 2017-18 - $0 capacity ($2.4 M programmed) • FY 2018-19 - $0 capacity ($2 M programmed) Airport Loan Program Low interest loans for eligible publicly owned/public use airports* Current rate ~3.9% APR; 17-Year payback – Revenue generating projects (e.g. hangar construction and aviation fuel facilities) to benefit GA – AIP Local Match (10%) Grant eligible projects – Acquisition and Development Grant eligible projects *Excludes projects that accommodate scheduled air carriers 5 Airport Loan Program Status Airport Loan Account Balance: $31 Million In FY 2017-18, $0.4M
    [Show full text]