(VIP) Peak District (East) Project Planning Statement

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Visual Impact Provision (VIP)

Peak District (East) Project

Planning Statement

National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV6 3DA

July 2019

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 3 1.1 Background and Context ...... 3 1.2 Environmental Impact Assessment ...... 4 1.3 Schedule of Supporting Documents and Drawings ...... 5 1.4 Structure of the Statement ...... 6 2 PROJECT NEED ...... 7 2.1 The VIP Project ...... 7 2.2 The Peak District (East Project ...... 8 3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 10 3.1 The Existing Site ...... 10 3.2 Development Proposals ...... 10 4 POLICY CONTEXT ...... 13 4.1 Introduction ...... 13 4.2 National Grid’s Environmental Sustainability Policy ...... 13 4.3 National Grid’s Environmental Guidance ...... 13 4.4 National Grid’s Stakeholder, Community and Amenity Policy ...... 13 4.5 The Holford and Horlock Rules ...... 13 4.6 Approach to Options Appraisal ...... 15 4.7 Planning Policy ...... 15 4.8 National Planning Policy Framework (2019) ...... 16 4.9 National Planning Practice Guidance ...... 18 4.10 Barnsley Local Plan (2019) ...... 19 4.11 Barnsley Trees and Hedgerows SPG (2012) ...... 19 4.12 Barnsley Walls and Fences SPG18 (2003) ...... 20 4.13 Peak District National Park Authority Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2011) ...... 20 4.14 Peak District National Park Authority Development Management Policies: Part 2 of the Local Plan (2019) ...... 20 4.15 Emerging Policy ...... 21 5 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS...... 22 5.1 Introduction ...... 22 5.2 Principle of Development ...... 22 5.3 Design and Sustainability ...... 24 5.4 Flood Risk and Climate Change ...... 24 5.5 Nature Conservation ...... 25 5.6 Landscape and Visual Character ...... 26 5.7 Ground Conditions ...... 26 5.8 Pollution Control and Protection ...... 26 5.9 Historic Environment ...... 27 5.10 Highways and Accessibility ...... 28 6 CONCLUSION ...... 29

APPENDICES APPENDIX A NATIONAL GRID ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

APPENDIX B PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background and Context 1.1.1 This planning statement has been prepared on behalf of National Grid. It supports a full planning application that has been made to Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Peak District National Park Authority for the following development: • Construction of a new sealing end compound, including permanent access; • Construction of a temporary haul road from Brook Hill Lane including widened bellmouth; • Construction of a temporary Trans Pennine Trail (TPT) diversion to be used for approximately 12-18 months; following construction approximately 410m of said diversion surface would be retained permanently; and • Erection of two bridges (one temporary and one permanent) along the TPT diversion 1.1.2 This application forms part of National Grid’s Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project which represents a major opportunity to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and environmental heritage within Great Britain’s most protected landscapes. The VIP project will make use of a £500m allocation by Ofgem to carry out work to help reduce the impact of existing transmission lines in English and Welsh Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and National Parks. 1.1.3 Following the results of a landscape and visual impact assessment undertaken in 2014, covering 571km of overhead line (overhead line) within the scope of the VIP, twelve transmission lines in eight AONBs and National Parks were identified as having the most significant visual impact. In September 2015, the VIP’s Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG) considered a wide range of factors and recommended four projects to be taken forward for potential engineering work, one of which falls partly within the Peak District National Park, referred to as the Peak District (East) Project. 1.1.4 National Grid is proposing to underground a 2km section of existing 400kV overhead line that runs from the eastern entrance of the Woodhead Tunnel in Dunford Bridge, to Wogden Foot on the boundary of the Peak District National Park. The project is referred to as the Peak District (East) Project (hereon referred to as the Proposed Project) and forms part of the wider VIP Project. 1.1.5 The Proposed Project is discussed in detail within Chapter 2 of the Environmental Assessment Report but briefly comprises: • Removal of the existing Sealing End Compound (SEC) at Dunford Bridge, eight pylons and 2km of 400kV overhead line; • An underground XLPE cable of approximately 1.8km along the Trans Pennine Trail from the entrance of the Woodhead Tunnel to the proposed new SEC; • Construction of a new SEC and replacement tension pylon including a permanent access off the Trans Pennine Trail; • Temporary laydown areas and access tracks to facilitate construction activities; and • Construction and removal of a temporary Trans Pennine Trail diversion for use during the construction phase of the Proposed Project (the diversion will include construction of a permanent Bridge 1 and a temporary Bridge 2). 1.1.6 While National Grid is seeking to secure full planning permission for those elements described in paragraph 1.1.1, all other works related to the Proposed Project constitute ‘Permitted Development’ under Schedule 2, of the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the GPDO), subject to the conditions in the order, are

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

covered by an exemption under the Electricity Act or are considered not development as shown on the Consents overview drawing (Planning Drawing PKD_660952_001) . 1.1.7 The Electricity Act 1989 sets out that, with certain exceptions, consent must be obtained for installing and maintaining any electric overhead line. Proposed works on overhead lines require a fresh consent unless they are permitted under an existing consent or under an available exemption. Under Section 37 of the Act, specific electricity works would require an application for consent to be submitted to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). However, due to the technical specification of the works involved with the Proposed Project, National Grid are seeking confirmation from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council that the Proposed Project would be exempt from requiring Section 37 consent as the works are covered by an available exemption and no significant adverse environmental effects have been predicted.

1.2 The Applicant 1.2.1 National Grid operates the high voltage electricity transmission system in Great Britain and owns the system in England and Wales. The system operates mainly at 400,000 and 275,000 volts, connecting the electricity generators to substations where the high voltages are transformed to lower voltages, enabling the power to be distributed to homes and businesses by Distribution Network Operators (DNO) who operate at a maximum of 132,000 volts. 1.2.2 National Grid is the only company licensed to transmit electricity in England and Wales. National Grid’s Transmission Licence was granted under the Electricity Act 1989, Section 6 (1) (b). When developing proposals for new network infrastructure, National Grid has a duty under the Electricity Act 1989 to do so in an efficient, co-coordinated and economical way. 1.2.3 National Grid is also required, under Section 38 of the Electricity Act 1989, to comply with the provisions of Schedule 9 of the Act. Schedule 9 requires licence holders, in the formulation of proposals to transmit electricity, to: • Schedule 9(1)(a) “have regard to the desirability of preserving natural beauty, of conserving flora, fauna and geological or physiographical features of special interest and of protecting sites, buildings and objects of architectural, historic or archaeological interest”; and • Schedule 9(1)(b) “do what he reasonably can to mitigate any effect which the proposals would have on the natural beauty of the countryside or on any such flora, fauna, features, sites, buildings or objects”.

1.3 Environmental Impact Assessment 1.3.1 Under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (as amended)., National Grid made a formal request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) screening opinion to the Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (21 December 2015) and the Peak District National Park Authority (18 December 2015). 1.3.2 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Peak District National Park Authority responded to the screening request on 16 January 2017 and 3 March 2016, respectively, concluding that formal EIA would not be required given the scale and nature of the Proposed Project. 1.3.3 Due to project evolution Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council requested an additional screening request to be submitted. National Grid made this further request for a screening opinion to Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority on 21 September 2018 under The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. 1.3.4 Peak District National Park Authority and Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council responded to the additional screening request on 15 October 2018 and 2 January 2019, respectively,

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

concluding once again that formal EIA would not be required given the scale and nature of the Proposed Project. 1.3.5 Although the Proposed Project does not constitute formal EIA development, National Grid have committed to providing an Environmental Assessment Report to support the planning application. The Environmental Assessment Report will demonstrate how National Grid intends to meet its environmental responsibilities, covering all elements of the Proposed Project (including any impacts arising from underground cabling works).

1.4 Schedule of Supporting Documents and Drawings 1.4.1 In accordance with the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the planning submission comprises the following documents as required to satisfy Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Peak District National Park Authorities validation requirements: • Application Form; • Landownership certificates; • Design and Access Statement; • Planning Statement (this statement); • Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) Peak District East VIP Project (Vol 1 main text; Vol 2 figures; Vol 3 appendices); • Environmental Assessment Report Summary; • Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Main Report and appendices comprising; • Appendix 2B.1: National Grid’s Environmental Sustainability Policy • Appendix 2B.2: National Grid’s Environmental Management System (EMS) • Appendix 2B.3: Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Plan (LEMP) • Appendix 2B.4: Outline Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) for the Mitigation of Effects on Archaeological Remains • Appendix 2B.5: Outline Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) • Appendix 2B.6: Outline Trans Pennine Trail Management Plan • Appendix 2B.7: Outline Asbestos Management Plan • Options Appraisal Study VIP Peak District East Project; • Electric and Magnetic Fields Report; and • Statement of Community Engagement. 1.4.2 The following planning drawings also form part of the planning submission:

• PKD_660952_002 Location Plan • PKD_660952_001 Consents Overview Plan • PKD_660952_003 Site Plan • PDD-33492-LAY-036 – 039 Figure 2.1 - Construction Works Boundary During Construction Phase • PDD-33492-LAY-030 Preliminary Bellmouth Layout AP7

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• PDD-33492-LAY-072 Bellmouth Location, Access and Public Rights of Way Plan • PDD-33492-LAY-010-1 Temporary Car Park Layout • PDD-33492-LAY-010-2 Temporary Car Park Layout - Aerial • PDD-33492-LAY-003 Elevations Showing Proposed New Cable Sealing End Compounds • PDD-33492-LAY-002 Layout Showing Proposed New Cable Sealing End Compounds • PDD_33492_LAY_Figure 2.4 Working Areas at Wogden Foot • PDD-33492-LAY-046-049 • Figure 2.3 - Proposed Permanent Operational Development • PDD-33492-LAY-055 Trans Pennine Trail Diversion Temporary Bridge 2 Cut & Fill Analysis and Profile • PDD-33492-LAY-056 Trans Pennine Trail Diversion- Temporary Bridge 2 General Arrangement • PDD-33492-LAY-050-054 Trans Pennine Trail Diversion Analysis • PDD-33492-LAY-058 Temporary Bridge Side Elevation • PDD-33492-LAY-057 Permanent Bridge - General Arrangement • PDD-33492-LAY-80 Elevations showing proposed new SEC 1.4.3 Collectively, these documents and figures explain and assess the development proposals. They should be read in conjunction with this Statement.

1.5 Structure of the Statement 1.5.1 This Statement comprises 5 sections. Following this introduction (Section 1), Section 2 provides a brief overview of the need for the VIP Project. Section 3 establishes the site context and goes on to describe the Proposed Development. Section 4 provides an introduction to national and local policy as well as National Grid guidance. Section 5 details the planning considerations for the Proposed Development while Section 6 offers a conclusion to the Statement.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

2 PROJECT NEED

2.1 The VIP Project 2.1.1 National Grid is funded by a price control mechanism which is agreed with, and set by Ofgem, the electricity and gas markets regulator. Ofgem and National Grid have agreed a set of price controls and incentives for the period from April 2013 to March 2021. 2.1.2 The price controls and incentives include a provision of £500 million for electricity transmission owners to mitigate the visual impact of existing electricity infrastructure in nationally protected landscapes in Great Britain. National Grid has referred to this as the ‘Visual Impact Provision’. 2.1.3 In 2012-2013 National Grid prepared a VIP policy statement, setting out how it proposed to use the fund and how stakeholders would be engaged in identifying opportunities for maximising benefits from it. After a public consultation on the draft between July and September 2013 the policy statement was presented to Ofgem for review. The policy statement made it clear that National Grid’s objective is ‘to achieve the maximum enhancement to the landscape from the available funds whilst ensuring that no significant adverse impacts arise as a result. 2.1.4 National Grid appointed expert landscape consultants to carry out landscape assessments in 30 English and Welsh AONB and National Parks and to identify suitable VIP Projects to take forward. 2.1.5 Following the results of the landscape and visual impact assessment1 (Technical Report, 2014), covering 571km of overhead line within the scope of the VIP Project, those sections of overhead line which had the greatest visual impact on the surrounding landscape were identified. 2.1.6 The national SAG was set up by National Grid in early 2015 to guide and advise National Grid in identifying and selecting projects to use the fund in the most efficient way and deliver maximum benefit in terms of enhancing the landscape. The SAG comprises organisations dedicated to conserving the landscape and countryside throughout England and Wales. The SAG helps National Grid to make decisions according to the guiding principles set out in the VIP policy document2. 2.1.7 The SAG reviewed the Technical Report (2014) and endorsed its findings, short listing 12 sections of overhead line in eight AONB’s and National Parks as having the most significant landscape and visual impact. Each of the short-listed AONBs and National Parks were studied to examine their ecology, archaeology, land ownership, geology and a range of other important factors including views obtained during stakeholder engagement. Local Stakeholder Reference Groups (SRG) were formed in the eight short listed areas. 2.1.8 The Peak District SRG was established in April 2015 and has been invaluable in providing vital information and advice on National Grid’s plans for reducing the impact of its transmission lines in the Peak District National Park.

1 NATIONAL GRID (2014) Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment of Existing Electricity Transmission Infrastructure in Nationally Protect Landscapes in England and Wales – Technical Report. [Online] Available from: https://www.nationalgridet.com/document/84141/download. October 2014.

2 NATIONAL GRID (2017) Visual Impact Provision: How we intend to reduce the visual impact of existing electricity transmission lines in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. [online] Available from: http://peakdistricteast.nationalgrid.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NG-VIP-Policy_updated-April- 2018_FINAL.pdf. Document reviewed and updated December 2017.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

2.1.9 Its membership includes representatives from the Peak District National Park Authority, Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, Dunford Parish Council, Natural England and the Trans Pennine Trail office. The Yorkshire Wildlife Trust also joined the group in summer 2018. 2.1.10 An initial Options Appraisal (OA) report was prepared (May to July 2015) for each of the 12 short listed areas to consider potential mitigation options. A further short list of the projects was prioritised for further detailed work by the SAG. 2.1.11 The SAG considered a wide range of factors and in September 2015 recommended that the following four projects be taken forward for potential engineering work: • Dorset AONB; • New Forest National Park; • Peak District (East) National Park; and, • Snowdonia National Park.

2.2 The Peak District (East Project 2.2.1 The Proposed Project represents a major opportunity to mitigate the visual impact of existing electricity infrastructure within the Peak District National Park near Dunford Bridge and to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and environmental heritage of the area. The overhead line in this area (overhead line 4ZO.2 subsection) is considered to have: • Landscape impacts of a high level of importance particularly relating to strong localised topographical variety around Dunford Bridge, together with the proximity of nearby areas of high conservation interest, recreational value and relative tranquillity, which all serve to increase the value of the landscape. Although the impact of the VIP Subsection is geographically contained, the scale of impact is high with the Terminal Pylon and SEC being locally dominant man-made features. • Visual impacts of a high level of importance with Dunford Bridge serving as a local gateway for visitors to the Pennine Moors. The pylons are seen in views from visitors using the promoted Trans Pennine Trail car park, picnic area and walkers and cyclists on the Trans Pennine Trail National Cycle Route 62. The scale of visual impacts on the local community in and around Dunford Bridge is also considered to be high due to the proximity of the overhead line and its elevated situation in relation to this settlement. 2.2.2 The Proposed Project has been developed from a number of options, taking into account engineering, land and environmental constraints identified from baseline studies, site walkovers and discussions with landowners and stakeholders. An options appraisal was undertaken over the period 2015 to 201834 to consider alternative route alignments for the overhead lines, cable route corridors, , alternative sites for the SEC and also alternative construction compound/laydown locations. 2.2.3 The Electricity Act 1989 sets out that, with certain exceptions, consent must be obtained for installing and maintaining any electric overhead line. Proposed works on overhead lines require a fresh consent unless they are permitted under an existing consent or under an

3 National Grid Visual Impact Provision – Peak District (East) Project Options Appraisal Study 2019

4 National Grid Visual Impact Provision – Peak District (East) Main On Site Laydown Area Options Appraisal Report

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

available exemption. Under Section 37 of the Act, specific electricity works would require an application for consent to be submitted to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). However, due to the technical specification of the works involved with the Proposed Project, National Grid are seeking confirmation from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council that the Proposed Project would be exempt from requiring Section 37 consent as the works are covered by an available exemption and no significant adverse environmental effects have been predicted. 2.2.4 Installation of the cable corridor and removal of the existing SEC at Dunford Bridge, including that on land which falls within the Peak District National Park is seen to constitute ‘Permitted Development’ under Schedule 2, Part 15, Class B (Paragraph B) of the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the GPDO), subject to the conditions in the order. 2.2.5 This planning statement seeks to justify consent for those elements of the Proposed Development that require planning permission under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, namely, the new SEC (including permanent access), the Trans Pennine Trail diversion for up to1.5 years including a permanent replacement of an existing bridge, a temporary bridge over the River Don, retention of a stretch of the diversion surface providing access to Yorkshire Water assets, and the temporary northern access road with associated access point. 2.2.6 Notwithstanding the points raised in paragraphs 2.2.3-2.2.5, for the purpose of environmental assessment all elements of the Proposed Project have been the subject of assessment detailed within the accompanying Environmental Assessment Report.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

3.1 The Existing Site 3.1.1 The existing 4ZO 400kV overhead line connects Stalybridge, Stocksbridge and Thorpe Marsh 400kV substations. The overhead line was constructed between 1966 and 1967 with standard lattice pylon design and strung with twin and quad conductor bundles along various sections. Fittings were subsequently refurbished in 2015 on 4ZO131 (high side) to 4ZO164R. A refurbishment scheme was also carried out in 2017-2018, with the conductors replaced along the route from Thorpe Marsh tower ZZH2A-4ZO 131 (low side). There is a high voltage cable section installed in the Woodhead Tunnel between Dunford Bridge and Woodhead connecting the eastern and western section of the overhead line. 3.1.2 The VIP Subsection runs eastwards from the existing Dunford Bridge Sealing End Compound (SEC) near the eastern entrance of the Woodhead Tunnel (Pylon 4ZO164R). It crosses the Peak District National Park boundary and continues north over the Upper Don River and the Trans Pennine Trail, south of the hamlet of Townhead towards Castle Hill. The VIP Subsection proposed to be rerouted underground is approximately 2km in length.

3.2 Development Proposals

Proposed Sealing End Compound 3.2.1 In order to make the transition between an underground cable and overhead line the construction of a SEC is required. A SEC usually comprises an overhead line terminal pylon set within or adjacent to a relatively flat area surrounded by security fencing. The SEC would contain cable terminations, electrical equipment, support structures and a small control building. The new overhead line terminal pylon (157R) to be located beyond the River Don will act as a support for the conductor system and downleads, these downleads feed each circuit into the SEC. A connection is provided to the electrical equipment via landing structures designed to take the tension force. Through discussion with stakeholders a SEC position close to the River Don was deemed preferable as this minimises the total area of permanent land take and infrastructure within the LWS by allowing the new tension tower to be located on the northern side of the River Don (in place of tower 157), rather than within the SEC. 3.2.2 The SEC would contain equipment that would be monitored remotely. Routine visits would be required to visually inspect condition of non-mechanical equipment, structures and buildings. Mechanical (manual operated) earth switches would require inspection and servicing as part of these visits. 3.2.3 The proposed SEC would be located within Wogden Foot Local Wildlife Site (LWS) at the eastern end of the new underground cable (See Figure 2.3) and occupy an area of approximately 36m x 67.9m to the fence line. There will be a planting exclusion zone outside of the fence line which will increase the SEC footprint to approx.40m x 75m (i.e. a 2m planting exclusion beyond the fence line). Permanent fencing will enclose the SEC which will typically be galvanised steel palisade fencing (approximately 2.4m high) topped with electric pulse fencing (additional 1m) for security. The total height of the fencing would be up to 3.4m high. 3.2.4 The contractor will determine the appropriate foundation type for the SEC although it is anticipated that piled or deep pad foundations will be required. The highest points within the SEC are the landing gantries at approximately 14.9m high (See Figure 2.6 Drawing PDD- 33492-LAY-003). 3.2.5 Construction of the SEC is likely to take approximately 20 weeks (excluding any cable installation works). During construction a laydown area (approximately 1ha) will be required in Wogden Foot LWS, to the west of the SEC. This area will be used to store excavated soil, sealing end compound plant, excavators, backfill materials, welfare facilities and waste storage.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

3.2.6 Access to the SEC during construction will initially be via vehicle access road AP7 prior to the opening of the Trans Pennine Trail diversion. Once this diversion is open, access to the SEC will predominantly be from the existing route of the Trans Pennine Trail. Limited managed access will still be available via the temporary bridge over the River Don whilst the temporary Trans Pennine Trail is open. Pre application discussions with Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council during options appraisal meetings included informal agreement for up to 10 vehicles per day to use the temporary bridge access whilst the temporary Trans Pennine Trail is in use. 3.2.7 The nearest residential properties to the SEC are located to the North over 300m away.

The Trans Pennine Trail Diversion and proposed Bridges 3.2.8 National Cycle Route 62 and the Trans Pennine Trail (Dunford Bridge to Penistone section) largely follows the alignment of the former Woodhead railway line, on the east of the Pennines along the upper Don Valley to the market town of Penistone, from west to east. The Trans Pennine Trail also forms part of European Long Distance Footpath E8. The existing Trans Pennine Trail is used by pedestrians, equestrians and cyclists and is made of a bound surface, approximately 3m wide, with an adjacent equestrian soft ground track. 3.2.9 During the construction of the Proposed Project, the Trans Pennine Trail will be diverted along a temporary route north of River Don to allow for the installation of the buried cable (see Figure 2.1). 3.2.10 Public rights of way (public footpaths, bridleways or restricted byways) are highways protected by law. To divert a right of way, a public path order will need to be requested from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. Diversions can take place for between one day and six months to allow for site works to be carried out safely. Extensions to this will be required to fulfil the requirements of the construction programme. 3.2.11 A Trans Pennine Trail Management Plan (See CEMP appendix 2B.6) details how users of the Trans Pennine Trail will be managed and co-ordinated with construction activities (see Figure 2.1 for the proposed diversion route and Figure 2.4 for the Temporary Diversion Construction Detail). 3.2.12 The diversion will commence immediately east of the Dunford Bridge car park and follow an existing farm track which will be upgraded to meet the gradient requirements of the Equality Act 2010 as far as possible. 3.2.13 The current woodend construction bridge (Bridge No.1) will be replaced with a new permanent bridge as it crosses the River Don. The proposed diversion route then follows the alignment of the farmer’s track as far as this goes, before continuing east over fields before crossing back to the southern bank over a newly constructed temporary bridge (Bridge No. 2). 3.2.14 Prior to merging back into the Trans Pennine Trail, the diversion will pass east of the SEC and in close proximity to the laydown area that will be used adjacent to Wogden foot. Two manned access gates will be installed along the diverted Trans Pennine Trail in the vicinity of the SEC to prevent potential conflict between Trans Pennine Trail users and the construction traffic that will move between the SEC and the north side of the River Don. For the majority of the time, the access gates will be open to allow the free movement of pedestrians and other users along the diversion. During periods of construction vehicle movements (e.g. up to 10 vehicle movements per day once the diversion is in place), which require the closure of the gates, a site operative will be positioned at each gate to control the movements in a safe manner. 3.2.15 The diversion will be approximately 1.6km in length and will be in place for approximately 1- 1.5 years. The Trans Pennine Trail diversion route and its design will be agreed with Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council prior to commencement of works.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

3.2.16 Construction of the Trans Pennine Trail diversion will require the excavation of approximately 200mm of topsoil, which will be stored alongside the diversion to form a bund (outside of the flood plain). The excavated surface will be lined with a geotextile membrane and filled with Type 1 granular sub-base and finished with a 100mm layer of hoggin or equivalent. Hoggin is a compactable fill material that is composed of a mixture of clay, gravel, and sand or granite dust that produces a buff-coloured permeable surface. The diversion will be typically 7m wide wherever possible to include a 5m wide compacted hard surface for use by Trans Pennine Trail users and 1m wide embankment on either side. It will be built on a 300mm embankment (approximate) above the existing surface, with the sides chamfered down to the existing ground level.

3.2.17 Where possible the Trans Pennine Trail diversion will be designed to comply with the relevant gradient requirements of the Equality Act, 2010, in order to be accessible to people with limited mobility, including wheelchair users, and to those with sensory impairments. Due to the nature of the topography, there are two areas where compliance will not be possible; where there are adverse slopes (further details are provided in the Trans Pennine Trail Management Plan (CEMP Appendix 2B.6), appropriate resting platforms (i.e. level areas on the slope adjacent to the Trans Pennine Trail) will be installed. 3.2.18 Following discussions with land owners, temporary water supplies and troughs will be provided for livestock as necessary. 3.2.19 A permanent replacement bridge will be constructed (Bridge 1 shown on Figure 2.1). This will be approximately 8.3m in length with timber side barriers. A temporary bridge (Bridge 2 shown on Figure 2.1) will also be required for the duration of construction activities to allow users of the Trans Pennine Trail diversion and occasional construction traffic to cross the River Don. The temporary bridge will be approximately 36.5m long and span the River Don and its banks. It will have solid wooden boarded sides. Bridges 1 and 2 have been designed to the 1:100 flood level. 3.2.20 Other watercourses and drainage ditches crossed by the diverted Trans Pennine Trail will be flumed (by the installation of temporary pipes) and ramped over to allow uninterrupted flow of water within the watercourse and a track for users of the Trans Pennine Trail and farm vehicles. Separate Land Drainage Consents may be required from the Local Planning Authority for the installation of these temporary bridges and/or flume crossings depending on their design which will be discussed with the Local Planning Authority post planning submission and constructed to minimise the risk of sediment run-off to watercourses and obstruction to migratory fish. 3.2.21 Regular monitoring will be put in place to ensure that the surface functions as intended and checks on the drainage system include ensuring that no material from the diverted Trans Pennine Trail falls into the watercourse. If this does occur the material will be removed immediately. Any flumes/ bridges that are required will be installed at the start of construction activities and removed during restoration. 3.2.22 The pedestrian and equestrian signs along with any other furniture removed during works will be stored and re-erected or replaced on completion of construction activities. 3.2.23 Following construction of the SEC, undergrounding of the cable, and reinstatement, the diversion of the Trans Pennine Trail will cease, and members of the public will use the existing Trans Pennine Trail. 3.2.24 Following construction of the temporary Trans Pennine Trail diversion a four-week handover period will take place during which both the existing Trans Pennine Trail and the temporary Trans Pennine Trail diversion are open for use by the public, before the reinstatement of the Trans Pennine Trail diversion can take place.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

4 POLICY CONTEXT

4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 The following section summarises National Grid’s environmental guidance before presenting the planning policy background relevant to the Proposed Development.

4.2 National Grid’s Environmental Sustainability Policy 4.2.1 National Grid is committed to operating its business in an environmentally responsible way and for ensuring that sustainability shapes its thinking and decision-making. A summary of National Grid’s environmental sustainability policy is provided in Appendix A.

4.3 National Grid’s Environmental Guidance 4.3.1 National Grid has a two-fold duty placed on it under Section 38 and Schedule 9 of the Electricity Act 1989 (1989 Act) when formulating proposals to: • have regard to the desirability of preserving natural beauty, of conserving flora, fauna, and geological or physiographical features of special interest and of protecting sites, buildings and objects of architectural, historic or archaeological interest; and • do what [it] reasonably can to mitigate any effect which the proposals would have on the natural beauty of the countryside or on any such flora, fauna, features, sites, buildings or objects.

4.4 National Grid’s Stakeholder, Community and Amenity Policy 4.4.1 National Grid's Stakeholder, Community and Amenity Policy5 includes 10 commitments linked to its environmental obligations under Schedule 9 of the 1989 Act. The following are of particular relevance to the identification of potential locations for SECs: • Commitment 3 – Seeking to avoid areas which are nationally or internationally designated for their landscape, wildlife or cultural significance; • Commitment 4 – Minimising the effects of works and new infrastructure on communities, by having particular regard to safety, noise and construction traffic, and on areas which are nationally or internationally designated for their landscape, wildlife or cultural significance and other sites valued for their amenity such as Listed Buildings, Conservation Areas, areas of archaeological interest, local wildlife sites, historic parks and gardens and historic battlefields (taking into account the significance of these and other areas through consultation with local authorities and other stakeholders with particular interests in such sites); and • Commitment 5 – Mitigating the adverse effects of works through the application of best practice environmental assessment techniques.

4.5 The Holford and Horlock Rules 4.5.1 In addition to the above guidance on siting all infrastructure, specific guidance on routeing overhead lines is provided by the ‘Holford Rules’6. Described below, the siting of SECs is

5 NATIONAL GRID (2010): National Grid's commitments when undertaking works in the UK - Our stakeholder, community and amenity policy: [Online] Available from: https://www.nationalgridgas.com/document/81026/download December 2016 6 NATIONAL GRID (2003): The National Grid Company plc and new high voltage transmission lines - Rules for line routeing (the Holford Rules) and undergrounding: [Online] Available from: http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyres/E9E1520A-EB09-4AD7-840B-A114A84677E7/41421/HolfordRules1.pdf.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

also influenced by the ability to appropriately route overhead connection infrastructure to its locations, which is guided by the Holford Rules. This guidance was reviewed by National Grid in 1992 and has become accepted within the electricity industry as the basis for overhead line routeing. The seven rules on minimising environmental effects in routeing overhead lines are summarised below: • Rule 1 – Avoid altogether, if possible, the major areas of highest amenity value; • Rule 2 – Avoid smaller areas of high amenity value, or scientific interests by deviation; provided that this can be done without using too many angle pylons; • Rule 3 – All things being equal, choose the most direct line, with no sharp changes of direction to minimise the number of angle pylons; • Rule 4 – Choose vegetation and hill backgrounds in preference to sky backgrounds wherever possible; • Rule 5 – Prefer moderately open valleys with woods where the apparent height of pylons will be reduced, and views of the line will be broken by trees; • Rule 6 – In country which is flat and sparsely planted, keep the high voltage lines as far as possible independent of smaller lines, converging routes, distribution poles and other masts, wires and cables so as to avoid a concatenation or ‘wirescape’; and • Rule 7 – Approach urban areas via industrial zones where they exist. • Three general supplementary notes to the rules advise: • Avoidance of routeing close to residential areas as far as possible on grounds of general amenity; • Identifying routes which minimise the effect on designations of County, District and local value; and • Evaluating where appropriate the use of alternative pylon designs where these would be advantageous visually, and where the extra cost can be justified. 4.5.2 Given that the Proposed Project involves the removal of overhead line, of more relevance are the Horlock Rules7, which relate to the siting of substations (and are also considered relevant and applicable to SEC siting). Key considerations include: • Guideline 1 – Consider environmental issues from the earliest stage to balance technical benefits and capital costs; • Guideline 2 – As far as reasonably practical, seek to avoid altogether internationally and nationally designated areas of highest amenity, cultural or scientific value; • Guideline 3 – Protect as far as reasonably practicable, possible areas of local amenity value, important existing habitats and landscape features including ancient woodland, historic hedgerows, surface and ground water resources and nature conservation areas;

March 2003 7 NATIONAL GRID (undated): NGC Substations and the Environment – Guidelines on Siting and Design. [Online] Available from: http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyres/74542DA5-7923-48AB-97AB- 77B1F3ED3492/45808/horlock_rules.pdf. Undated.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• Guideline 4 – Take advantage of the screening provided by landform and existing features and the potential use of site layout and levels to keep intrusion into surrounding areas to a reasonably practicable minimum; • Guideline 5 – Keep visual, noise and other environmental effects to a reasonably practicable minimum; and • Guideline 6 – Consider land use effects when planning siting of substations or extensions, including nationally important land such as Grade 1 agricultural land and sites of nationally scarce minerals. 4.5.3 Three further items relate to matters of design to keep effects to a reasonable minimum to assist in integrating a development into its surroundings including: • the consideration of options for equipment; • effective use of space to minimise the adverse effects on existing land use and rights of way; and • design of access roads, fencing, earth shaping and planting.

4.6 Approach to Options Appraisal 4.6.1 Published in August 2012, National Grid’s ‘Approach to Options Appraisal’8 describes a framework and references a list of topics which should be addressed, which allows National Grid to identify and balance technical, socioeconomic, environmental and cost considerations to help inform decisions around project options. It also enables the information on which judgements have been based to be documented in a transparent manner. An initial Options Appraisal study was undertaken to consider various options for the Proposed Project, the findings of which are reported in National Grid Visual Impact Provision Peak District National Park Eastern Section Options Appraisal Study (2015)9. During the period 2015-2018 further options appraisal work was undertaken to consider the project development as reported in the Peak District East Options Appraisal Study 201910.

4.7 Planning Policy 4.7.1 The application falls within the administrative area of Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority. 4.7.2 Read in conjunction with the Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 5 (Planning Policy), this Section sets out the prevailing planning policy context within which the Proposed Development falls to be determined. This Statement considers the location of the Site combined with the proposal’s nature and design against such policy and sets out the basis of the planning policy rationale for the Proposed Project. 4.7.3 Relevant policy considered in this section includes: • The National Planning Policy Framework (MHCLG, February 2019); • Online National Planning Practice Guidance (DCLG, November 2016);

8 NATIONAL GRID: Our Approach to Options Appraisal: August 2012

9Visual Impact Provision – Peak District National Park Eastern Section Options Appraisal Study (http://peakdistricteast.nationalgrid.co.uk/wp- content/uploads/2016/06/150821-Peak-District-East-DOR-for-SAG.pdff)

10 http://peakdistricteast.nationalgrid.co.uk/category/documents/

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• Barnsley Local Plan (BMBC, January 2019); • Barnsley Trees and Hedgerows (SPG) (BMBC, 2012); • Barnsley Walls and Fences (SPG) (BMBC, 2003); • Peak District National Park Authority Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (PDNPA, 2011); and • Peak District National Park Authority Development Management Policies: Part 2 of the Local Plan (2019).

4.8 National Planning Policy Framework (2019) 4.8.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), 2019)11 provides the national policy context against which planning decisions should be considered. NPPF Paragraph 7 states that the purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development. Further NPPF Paragraphs 10 and 11 set out the presumption in favour of sustainable development: ‘For decision making, this means:

c. approving development proposals that accord with an up-to-date development plan without delay; or d. where there are no relevant development plan policies, or the policies which are most important for determining the application are out-of-date, granting permission unless: i. the application of policies in this Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provides a clear reason for refusing the development proposed; or

ii. any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in this Framework taken as a whole.’ 4.8.2 NPPF Paragraph 8 outlines the planning systems three overarching objectives in order to achieve sustainable development: ‘which are interdependent and need to be pursued in mutually supportive ways (so that opportunities can be taken to secure net gains across each of the different objectives): a. an economic objective – to help build a strong, responsive and competitive economy, by ensuring that sufficient land of the right types is available in the right places and at the right time to support growth, innovation and improved productivity; and by identifying and coordinating the provision of infrastructure; b. a social objective – to support strong, vibrant and healthy communities, by ensuing that a sufficient number and range of homes can be provided to meet the needs of present and future generation; and by fostering a well-designed and safe built environment, with accessible services and open spaces that reflect current and future needs and support communities’ health, social and cultural well-being; and

c. an environmental objective – to contribute to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and historic environment; including making effective use of land, helping to improve biodiversity, using

11 Department for Communities and Local Government. (2019), National Planning Policy Framework

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

natural resources prudently, minimising waste and pollution, and mitigation and adapting to climate change, including moving to a low carbon economy.’ 4.8.3 The NPPF sets out 13 sub-topics beneath the goal of Achieving Sustainable Development. The most relevant are described below along with an explanation of how the Proposed Project accords with the framework. 4.8.4 In terms of promoting sustainable transport, NPPF Paragraph 102 states that: ‘Transport issues should be considered from the earliest stages of plan-making and development proposals, so that: a) the potential impacts of development on transport networks can be addressed; b) opportunities from existing or proposed transport infrastructure, and changing transport technology and usage, are realised – for example in relation to the scale, location or density of development that can be accommodated; c) opportunities to promote walking, cycling and public transport use are identified and pursued; d) the environmental impacts of traffic and transport infrastructure can be identified, assessed and taken into account – including appropriate opportunities for avoiding and mitigating any adverse effects, and for net environmental gains; and e) patterns of movement, streets, parking and other transport considerations are integral to the design of schemes, and contribute to making high quality places.’ 4.8.5 In terms of achieving well-designed places, NPPF Paragraph 124 states that: ‘The creation of high quality buildings and places is fundamental to what the planning and development process should achieve. Good design is a key aspect of sustainable development, creates better places in which to live and work and helps make development acceptable to communities. Being clear about design expectations, and how these will be tested, is essential for achieving this. So too is effective engagement between applicants, communities, local planning authorities and other interests throughout the process.’ 4.8.6 In terms of meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and coastal change, NPPF Paragraph 148 states that: ‘The planning system should support the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate, taking full account of flood risk and coastal change. It should help to: shape places in ways that contribute to radical reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, minimise vulnerability and improve resilience; encourage the reuse of existing resources, including the conversion of existing buildings; and support renewable and low carbon energy and associated infrastructure.’ 4.8.7 In terms of conserving and enhancing the natural environment, NPPF Paragraph 170 states that: ‘(…)decisions should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by: a) Protecting and enhancing valued landscapes, sites of biodiversity or geological value and soils; b) recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and the wider benefits from natural capital and ecosystem services – including the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land, and of trees and woodland; c) maintaining the character of the undeveloped coast, while improving public access to it where appropriate; d) minimising impacts on and providing net gains for biodiversity, including by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures;

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

e) preventing new and existing development from contributing to, being put at unacceptable risk from, or being adversely affected by, unacceptable levels of soil, air, water or noise pollution or land instability. Development should, wherever possible, help to improve local environmental conditions such as air and water quality, taking into account relevant information such as river basin management plans; and f) remediating and mitigating despoiled, degraded, derelict, contaminated and unstable land, where appropriate.’ 4.8.8 In terms of conserving and enhancing the historic environment, NPPF Paragraph 185 states that: ‘Plans should set out a positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment, including heritage assets most at risk through neglect, decay or other threats. This strategy should take into account: a) the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets, b) and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; c) the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits that conservation of the historic environment can bring; d) the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness; and e) opportunities to draw on the contribution made by the historic environment to the character of a place.’ 4.8.9 In terms of promoting healthy and safe communities, NPPF Paragraph 97 relates to open space and recreation stating that: ‘Existing open space, (…) and recreational buildings and land, (…), should not be built on unless: (…) b) the loss resulting from the proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and quality in a suitable location; or (…).’ 4.8.10 In terms of proposals affecting the Green Belt, NPPF Paragraph 144 states that: ‘When considering any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt. ‘Very special circumstances’ will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm resulting from the proposal, is clearly outweighed by other considerations.’ 4.8.11 NPPF Paragraph 146 goes on to state that: Certain other forms of development are also not inappropriate in the Green Belt provided they preserve its openness and do not conflict with the purposes of including land within it. These are: (…); b) engineering operations; (…).’

4.9 National Planning Practice Guidance 4.9.1 In March 2014, the DCLG published its National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) on-line guidance resource to use alongside the NPPF. The PPG consolidated and revised several existing practice guidance documents. Since its initial publication, the PPG has been the

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

subject of a number of updates, the latest of which being on 22 October 2018. The PPG provides guiding principles on matters such as: • accounting of the risks associated with flooding and coastal change (NPPG ID: 7); • protecting landscape, biodiversity, ecosystems, green infrastructure, soils and agricultural land (NPPG ID: 8); • helping to understand viability in terms of decision taking (NPPG ID: 10); • consultation (NPPG ID: 15); • conserving and enhancing the historic environment (NPPG ID: 18a); and • ensuring that development is appropriately suited to its location, and that there are no unacceptable risks caused by unstable land or subsidence (NPPG ID 45).

4.10 Barnsley Local Plan (2019) 4.10.1 Appendix 1 provides detail on the following relevant polices: • Policy SD1 (Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development); • Policy HE1 (The Historic Environment); • Policy HE2 (Heritage Statements and general application procedures); • Policy HE6 (Archaeology); • Policy GB1 (Protection of Green Belt); • Policy GS2 (Green Ways and Public Rights of Way); • Policy BIO1 (Biodiversity and Geodiversity); • Policy LC1 (Landscape Character); • Policy CC1 (Climate Change); • Policy CC2 (Sustainable Design and Construction); • Policy CC3 (Flood Risk); • Policy CC4 (Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)); • Policy CC5 (Water Resource Management); • Policy CL1 (Contaminated and Unstable Land); • Policy Poll1 (Pollution Control and Protection); • Policy T1 (Accessibility Priorities); • Policy T2 (Safeguarding of Former Railway Lines); and • Policy T3 (New Development and Sustainable Travel). 4.10.2 Planning policies from the Barnsley Local Plan (2019) that affect the Study Area are shown in Figure 1.

4.11 Barnsley Trees and Hedgerows SPG (2012) 4.11.1 This SPG offers guidance to landowners, architects and builders on how to deal with existing trees and hedgerows on development sites. The SPG advises on statutory legislation, layout of development and protection of trees and hedgerows during development.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

4.12 Barnsley Walls and Fences SPG18 (2003) 4.12.1 SPG18 provides guidance in relation to the design and appearance of walls and fences.

4.13 Peak District National Park Authority Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2011) 4.13.1 Appendix 1 provides detail on the following relevant polices: • Policy GSP1 (Securing national park purposes and sustainable development); • Policy GSP2 (Enhancing the National Park); • Policy GSP3 (Development Management Principles); • Policy L1 (Landscape character and valued characteristics); • Policy L2 (Sites of biodiversity or geodiversity importance); • Policy L3 (Cultural heritage assets of archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic significance); • ‘Policy CC1 (Climate change mitigation and adaptation); • Policy CC3 (Waste management); • Policy CC5 (Flood risk and water conservation); • Policy T5 (Managing the demand for rail, and reuse of former railway routes); and • Policy T6 (Routes for walking, cycling and horse riding, and waterways).

4.14 Peak District National Park Authority Development Management Policies: Part 2 of the Local Plan (2019) 4.14.1 Appendix B provides detail on the following relevant polices: • Policy DMC1 (Conservations and enhancement of nationally significant landscapes); • Policy DMC3 (Siting, design, layout and landscaping); • Policy DMC5 (Assessing the impact of development on designated and non- designated heritage assets and their settings); • Policy DMC7 (Listed Buildings); • Policy DMC11 (Safeguarding, recording and enhancing nature conservation interests); • Policy DMC12 (Sites, features or species of wildlife, geological or geomorphological importance); • Policy DMC13 (Protecting trees, woodland or other landscape features put at risk by development); • Policy DMC14 (Pollution and disturbance); • Policy DMC15 (Contaminated and unstable land); • Policy DMT5 (Development affecting a public right of way); and • Policy DMU2 (New and upgraded utilities services). 4.14.2 Planning policies from the Peak District National Park Authority Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan and the Peak District National Park Authority Development Management Policies: Part 2 of the Local Plan that affect the Study Area are shown in Figure 2.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

4.15 Emerging Policy 4.15.1 Following the adoption of the Barnsley Local Plan the Council are currently consulting on Draft Supplementary Planning Documents, Planning Advice Notes and updated Local Validation Requirements.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

5 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS

5.1 Introduction 5.1.1 Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (PCPA) (2004) confirms that planning applications should be determined in accordance with the Development Plan unless material circumstances indicate otherwise. 5.1.2 This established a presumption in favour of granting permission for developments which are in accordance with the development plan. 5.1.3 This principle has been developed and clarified by subsequent case law, which has confirmed that a particular proposal does not need to accord with each and every policy in a development plan, the key issue is that it accords with the overall thrust of development plan policies taken as a whole. 5.1.4 The application is considered against relevant planning policies in relation to each of the main planning issues raised. Before addressing each of these aspects in turn, it is important to note that the primary material consideration in the determination of this application relates to the need to mitigate the visual impact of existing electric infrastructure within the Peak District National Park near Dunford Bridge and to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and environmental heritage of the area. 5.1.5 The accompanying Environmental Assessment Report describes the site and Proposed Development in greater detail, along with providing an assessment of the likely effects arising. Taking into consideration the prevailing policy framework outlined within Section 4 above, the main planning issues raised by this application are considered within the remainder of this section under the following headings: • Principle of Development; • Design and Sustainability; • Flood Risk and Climate Change; • Nature Conservation; • Landscape and Visual Character; • Ground Conditions; • Pollution Control and Protection; • Water Resources; • Historic Environment; and • Highways and Accessibility.

5.2 Principle of Development 5.2.1 The Proposed Project represents a major opportunity to mitigate the visual impact of existing electricity infrastructure within and adjacent to the Peak District National Park and to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and environmental heritage of the area (in accordance with PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy GSP1, PDNP Local Plan Policy DMC1). Consultation and stakeholder input has been integral to the principle, design and development of the Proposed Project and National Grid has worked closely with Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, the Peak District National Park Authority and key stakeholders in developing the project. It is considered that the overall effects of the Proposed Project will result in substantial improvement to landscape character and visual amenity.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

5.2.2 The existing VIP Subsection of 400 kV overhead line has previously been identified as having a high level of adverse landscape and visual effects. The removal of 2km of this overhead line (including 8 pylons and the existing Dunford Bridge SEC) will improve the openness of the Green Belt as well as giving rise to significant beneficial landscape and visual enhancements, particularly within the western end of the Upper Don Valley, around Dunford Bridge. Given that the cable corridor will be undergrounded, this component of the Proposed Project will preserve the openness of the Green Belt (BMBC Local Plan GB1). It is acknowledged that the new SEC would be located within Wogden Foot LWS and on land designated as Green Belt. Discussions regarding the location of the SEC were undertaken with stakeholders as part of the options appraisal for the Proposed Project (see Environmental Assessment Report, Chapter 2). Given that the SEC will be viewed as a much smaller feature in the landscape than the existing VIP Subsection that will be replaced, the overall impact on Green Belt is considered to result in a positive impact rather than negative (BMBC Local Plan GB1). 5.2.3 During the construction of the SEC and cable corridor (which will route along the Trans Pennine Trail) a diversion will be required for the Trans Pennine Trail, running almost parallel to the River Don within the River Don Valley Corridor. The Trans Pennine Trail will remain open during the construction of the proposed development; although this will be facilitated by a temporary diversion of the trail from Dunford Bridge to Wogden Foot LWS. The diversion will take approximately six months to construct and will be in place for up to 1.5 year. A Trans Pennine Trail Management Plan (Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 2A) has been prepared in consultation with the Rights of Way Officers and Trans Pennine Trail organisation and will include a trail surface inclusive to a range of users (e.g. walker, cyclists, equestrians and disabled access). Following construction, the current Trans Pennine Trail will be reinstated with a surface specification as agreed with Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. Pedestrian and equestrian signs along with any other furniture removed during the construction works will be re-erected or replaced as part of the reinstatement (NPPF Para 98, PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy T6 and PDNP DMP Policy DMT5). 5.2.4 While National Grid’s proposals were largely well received during public consultation, a small number of respondents raised concerns about what that would mean for prospects for reinstatement of a rail route. In that regard it is acknowledged that Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council are seeking to safeguard former railway lines (BMBC Local Plan Policy T2). It should be noted that there are currently no transport proposals relating to the former Woodhead route in either the Transport for the North (TfN)’s ‘Long Term Rail Strategy’12 or the ‘draft Strategic Transport Plan’13, both of which are looking to set priorities for improved transport connectivity for the next 30 years. TfN’s latest update in relation to the Southern Pennines Strategic Development Corridor14 makes no reference to the former Woodhead railway as a future intervention. Should a future rail scheme to reinstate the former Woodhead railway be approved in the future, any utility infrastructure would need to be diverted, protected or relocated to make way for the rail infrastructure as required. This would be assessed as part of any future planning application and does not preclude development as part of this application.

12 https://transportforthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/Long-Term-Rail-Strategy_TfN.pdf

13 https://transportforthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/TfN-Strategic-Plan_draft_lr.pdf

14 https://transportforthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/Southern-Pennines-Strategic-Programme-Outline- Case.pdf

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

5.2.5 While the Peak District National Park Authority are clear in their efforts to manage the demand for rail and reuse of former railway routes, irrespective of safeguarding land for schemes, it is acknowledged that none have yet to be accepted in principle and should any proposals come forward in future, they will be assessed on their individual merits and will be the subject of rigorous examination including the continuity of the Trans Pennine Trail (PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy T5).

5.3 Design and Sustainability 5.3.1 As detailed in Chapter 2 (Project Description) of the Environmental Assessment Report, the Proposed Project design has been selected following an options appraisal process which followed the general approach set out in National Grid’s document ‘Our approach to Options Appraisal’ (2012). (BMBC Local Plan Policy SD1 and PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy GSP3). As detailed in the Peak District National Park Eastern Section Options Appraisal Reports15, 16, a variety of options were considered including potential alignments for the cable corridor, the potential location of the SEC, and laydown areas which sought to actively respond to the presence of a variety of factors and stakeholder feedback. 5.3.2 An integral part of the iterative design for the Proposed Project has been the consideration of mitigation through sensitive design development in accordance with the Holford Rules and Horlock Rules. The aim has been to ensure that the development takes account of environmental constraints and opportunities and achieves the optimum environmental fit as part of an environmentally integrated design (BMBC Local Plan Policy CC2). 5.3.3 The appearance of the SEC primarily derives from the functional need and the safety requirements. During the ongoing design process, there has been a continuing exploration of opportunities for mitigation through considered siting of the proposed Wogden Foot SEC and permanent access road as well as on-site and offsite planting. The aim has been to maximise use of screening vegetation, and where relevant identify any opportunities for any on-site and offsite planting to help integrate the Proposed Project into the landscape (PDNP DMP Policy DMC3). 5.3.4 While the Trans Pennine Trail will be diverted during the construction of the SEC and cable corridor, the temporary route will be designed to be compliant with the relevant gradient requirements of the Equality Act 2010 (PDNP DMP Policy DMC3) and include a trail surface inclusive to a range of users (e.g. walker, cyclists, equestrians and disabled access) (BMBC Local Plan Policy GS2 and PDNP DMP Policy DMT5). 5.3.5 As detailed in the Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) (Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 2B), National Grid and the appointed Principal Contractor will adopt a proactive approach to sustainable design and construction and will seek to maximise resource efficiency through reducing the amount of waste generated (PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy CC3), minimising water consumption and making the most efficient use of energy during the construction of the Proposed Project (NPPF Para 8).

5.4 Flood Risk and Climate Change 5.4.1 A Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) (Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 9J) has been prepared for the proposed development and identifies flood risk mitigation measures to ensure that it will not result in an increase in flood risk elsewhere during construction,

15Visual Impact Provision – Peak District National Park Eastern Section Options Appraisal Study (http://peakdistricteast.nationalgrid.co.uk/wp- content/uploads/2016/06/150821-Peak-District-East-DOR-for-SAG.pdff)

16 http://peakdistricteast.nationalgrid.co.uk/category/documents/

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

operation and decommissioning phases. Flood modelling has been undertaken to ensure that the Proposed Project will remain safe and will not result in an increase in flood risk elsewhere, over its intended design lifetime. 5.4.2 Both the SEC and the diversion of the Trans Pennine Trail (including bridges) have been designed to be located outside the River Don’s floodplain wherever possible (BMBC Local Plan CC1, CC3 and PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy CC1 and CC5). Where the Trans Pennine Trail diversion will need to traverse the River Don in two locations, these new crossings have been designed using the results of the detailed flood risk modelling to ensure that they will remain safe and flood-free under the 1 in 100 year (plus climate change) event. With the implementation of proposed mitigation measures, it is concluded that the Proposed Project will remain safe and operational for its lifetime, will not increase flood risk elsewhere and where possible, will reduce flood risk overall (NPPF Para 163). 5.4.3 The future impacts of climate change such as increased rainfall intensity and rising groundwater levels have been key considerations during the design of the Proposed Project, to ensure that there is no net loss of flood plain storage, and no impediment to flood water flows or surface water run-off (NPPF Para 150 and PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy CC5).

5.5 Nature Conservation 5.5.1 The majority of the Project Area comprises various grassland communities, including; improved and unimproved grassland, dry heath/acid grassland mosaic and semi-improved acid grassland. Other areas include broadleaved semi-natural woodland, coniferous plantation woodland, bracken, amenity grassland and species poor hedgerows. 5.5.2 The potential effects of the Proposed Project on ecological features (designated sites, species and habitats have been assessed in Chapter 7 (Ecology) of the Environmental Assessment Report. 5.5.3 Although the Proposed Project will result in some effects upon statutory and non-statutory sites, with mitigation incorporated during and post construction, the direct and indirect effects upon these sites has been avoided, reduced or mitigated such that the overall residual effects will be not be significant (NPPF Para 170, BMBC Local Plan BIO1, PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy L2 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC12). Similarly, the residual effects following the incorporation of mitigation measures on undesignated habitats will be not be significant (BMBC Local Plan BIO1, PDNP LDC Core Strategy DPD Policy L2 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC12). A range of mitigation measures will be delivered as detailed in the Landscape and Ecological Management Plan (LEMP) (Appendix 2B.3 of the CEMP) to avoid and minimise potential effects to ecological features (PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy GSP2 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC11). It should be noted that in addition to no significant effects National Grid is committed to ensuring that opportunities to not only ensure no net loss but to provide biodiversity net gain are delivered on the Proposed Project. Opportunities to provide additional ecological gains for enhancement of habitats and benefits for species which are predicted to be subject to adverse effects during construction have been pursued with stakeholders since the inception of the Proposed Project. These potential areas offer opportunities for improvement in habitat condition over a larger area than is being lost, and therefore contribute towards gains for biodiversity. 5.5.4 An arboricultural survey was undertaken in accordance with British Standard (BS) 5837:2012 within proximity to planning applicable elements of the Proposed Project i.e. the SEC within Wogden Foot, the Trans Pennine Trail diversion and bridges and accesses. As detailed in the Landscape and Ecological Management Plan (LEMP) (CEMP Appendix 2B.3), trees to be retained will be protected in accordance with BS5837 and the accompanying Arboricultural Assessment for the entirety of the works (BMBC Trees and Hedgerows SPD and PDNP DMP Policy DMC20). In addition non BS arboricultural surveys were carried out for other Proposed Project elements i.e. 2km length of land along the Trans Pennine Trail, the existing SEC and potential laydown areas

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

5.5.5 During construction the proposed development could have potential effects on bats, reptiles and breeding and wintering birds. However, through appropriate mitigation measures including timing of works, prompt re-instatement, landscape planting, limited night time working as well as through obtaining licences and undertaking pre-construction surveys, the significance of effects are assessed as being negligible or minor and there’re considered not to be significant (BMBC Local Plan BIO1, PDNP LDC Core Strategy DPD Policy L2 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC12).

5.6 Chapter 7 (Ecology) also includes an expanded summary of policy compliance in relation to Nature Conservation as Appendix 7N.Landscape and Visual Character 5.6.1 As detailed in Chapter 6 (Landscape and Visual) of the Environmental Assessment Report, although much of the Proposed Project is situated within a typically highly valued area of landscape on the edge of the Peak District National Park, the contained topography of the Upper Don Valley will limit the extent of the operational landscape and visual effects of the proposed above ground structures including the SEC. 5.6.2 The immediate landscape currently has high levels of human influence, including the existing overhead line. Although some limited tree cover would be permanently lost due to the cable corridor and SEC this would not have a significant effect on the character of the landscape. The replacement of native trees and shrubs elsewhere would also help to assimilate the structures into the landscape and filter/ screen them from many viewpoints. 5.6.3 There are some localised moderate adverse (significant) effects in relation to people using the Trans Pennine Trail and a small proportion of the community of Carlecotes around the proposed SEC at Wogden Foot in year 1, although this will reduce to minor by year 15 and it is anticipated that on balance the Proposed Project will result in a significant enhancement to the landscape character and visual amenity, particularly within the western end of the Upper Don Valley, around Dunford Bridge (NPPF Para 170, BMBC Local Plan LC1, PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy L1 and PDNP DMP Policy DMU2).

5.7 Ground Conditions 5.7.1 As detailed within Chapter 10 (Geology, Soils and Contaminated Land) of the Environmental Assessment Report, a geology, soils and contaminated land assessment has been undertaken to assess the potential construction, operational and decommissioning effects resulting from the Proposed Project, and to identify measures required to protect the hydrogeological and geological environment (NPPF Para 8 and 178). 5.7.2 Ground investigations have indicated that some sources of land contamination may be present including areas of potential infilling and areas of historical industrial land use (railway and sidings). However, with the implementation of a number of embedded mitigation measures, adopted as part of the project design process, there will be no significant impacts relating human health, soils or contaminated land are predicted during the construction, operation and decommissioning phases (BMBC Local Plan Policy CL1 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC15).

5.8 Pollution Control and Protection 5.8.1 Chapter 9 (Water Resources), Chapter 10 (Geology, Soils and Contaminated Land) and Chapter 14 (Noise and Vibration) make reference to best construction practices that will be implemented to minimise potential pollution impacts (NPPF Para 170). As detailed in the CEMP (Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 2B), appropriate industry best practice and published guidelines, and specific mitigation measures will be followed to controlling general pollution from construction operations. This will include measures for controlling dust and general pollution from construction operations to the surface and groundwater environments. With the implementation of mitigation measures, no significant effects on

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

water resources during the construction, operation and decommissioning phases are predicted (BMBC Local Plan Policy Poll1 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC14). 5.8.2 A combination of noise monitoring and predictive calculations have been undertaken to establish the existing noise climate and the change in noise levels predicted as a result of the Proposed Project during construction. The Project will be designed to work within the limits set by BS5228 and mitigation measures associated with Best Practicable Means will be adopted (NPPF Para 180). 5.8.3 A water resources assessment has been undertaken and considers the surface water and groundwater receptors that have the potential to be impacted by the Proposed Project during the construction, operational and decommissioning phases. Any impacts will be minimised through the adoption of best construction practices and mitigation measures identified within the CEMP (BMBC Local Plan Core Strategy Policy CC5).

5.8.4 A Sustainable Drainage (SuDS) Strategy (Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 9K) has been prepared for the proposed development and presents SuDS solutions for those components of the project that will introduce permanent new impermeable areas (NPPF Para 163). SuDS will comprise the use of gravel surfaces or permeable surfaces with freely- draining sub-base areas. A SuDS Maintenance and Management Plan will be prepared and will ensure the adequate upkeep of all graded stone surfaces, gravel sub-base and grass- concrete areas associated with the proposed SuDS to enable surface water to continue to be stored (and potentially infiltrate to ground) over the design lifetime of these elements of the Proposed Project (BMBC Local Plan Policy CC4 and PDNP LDF Core Strategy DPD Policy LC22).

5.9 Historic Environment 5.9.1 As detailed in Chapter 8 (Archaeology and Cultural Heritage) of the Environmental Assessment Report, an archaeological and cultural heritage assessment has been undertaken to assess the potential construction, operational and decommissioning effects resulting from the Proposed Project on the archaeological features of the area (NPPF Para 189, BMBC Local Plan Policy HE1, HE2, HE6). 5.9.2 A range of mitigation measures will be implemented to offset potential impacts upon archaeological remains and built heritage including: • protection (securing protective measures through signage, barriers or surface matting to protect an asset during the construction phase). • earthwork survey (undertaking a measured survey of upstanding remains prior to alteration to provide a permanent record of their pre-development state); • condition survey (a rapid photographic and written record of the condition of assets prior to development); and • watching brief (monitoring by a professional archaeologist of groundworks for the development where these affected known assets are, or areas in which archaeological remains may be present). 5.9.3 Permanent direct impacts associated with temporary and permanent construction works would result in negligible effects upon the historic environment for which mitigation measures including earthwork survey, condition survey and watching brief are specified (PDNP LDF Core Strategy Policy L3 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC5). 5.9.4 Minor adverse effects on the significance of the Grade II listed Dick Royd Farmhouse and Barn to Upper Townhead Farm are anticipated due to the introduction and visible presence of the SEC (and Pylon 4ZO157R), however, an outline WSI has been produced in collaboration with Peak District National Park Authority archaeologists and South Yorkshire

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Archaeological Services to outline mitigation required to minimise potential effects on the historic environment, and with the removal of overhead lines within the Wogden Foot LWS the overall effect is considered to be a net benefit (BMBC Local Plan Policy HE6 and PDNP DMP Policy DMC7).

5.10 Highways and Accessibility 5.10.1 As detailed within Chapter 12 (Traffic and Transport) of the Environmental Assessment Report, a traffic assessment has been undertaken to assess the potential effects of traffic during the construction, operational and decommissioning phases of the Proposed Project (NPPF Para 102). 5.10.2 The main links providing access to and from the Proposed Project site at Dunford, and the offsite fabrication site at Crow Edge include the A628, Goddard Lane, A616 Whams Road, Windle Edge/Brook Hill Lane and B6106 Bents Road. 5.10.3 The potentially significant environmental effects of severance, driver delay, pedestrian delay, pedestrian amenity, fear and intimidation and accidents and safety have been considered by comparing the construction traffic generated by the Proposed Project with existing traffic flows on the local road network (NPPF Para 102 and BMBC Local Plan Policy T3). 5.10.4 The assessment concludes that the Proposed Project will have a negligible adverse effect on driver delay, pedestrian and cyclist amenity and delay. The effects are not considered to be significant and will occur on a temporary basis whilst construction is in progress. A significant effect has been identified on Fear and Intimidation, although given that the existing baseline flows are low the introduction of the volume of construction vehicles proposed would in reality be less significant than that suggested by the proportional increase, mitigation measures included in the Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) (appendix 2B.5 of the CEMP) which include speed restrictions have been indicated by Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council as being acceptable. 5.10.5 Accident data has shown that the current risk of accidents is low and with safety measures embedded into the project design these accident rates are unlikely to change during the construction phase. 5.10.6 A Construction Traffic Management Plan identifying the preferred route for all construction traffic, and potential mitigation measures, has been prepared to accompany the planning application for the Proposed Project (BMBC Local Plan Policy T3). This would include measures to manage any closure points and set out diversions where the Proposed Project conflicts with PROWs at four locations.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

6 CONCLUSION 6.1.1 This application forms part of National Grid’s Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project which represents a major opportunity to conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and environmental heritage within Great Britain’s most protected landscapes. The VIP project will make use of a £500m allocation by Ofgem to carry out work to help reduce the impact of existing transmission lines in English and Welsh Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and National Parks. 6.1.2 The Proposed Project has been designed by applying a stakeholder led approach. Meetings have been ongoing with the local Stakeholder Reference Group since 2015, including representatives from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, Peak District National Park Authority, Natural England, the Trans Pennine Trail Organisation and Dunford Bridge Parish Council. The Proposed Project has been developed from a number of options, taking into account engineering, land and environmental constraints identified from baseline studies, site walkovers and discussions with landowners and stakeholders. 6.1.3 Although the Proposed Project does not constitute formal EIA development, the accompanying Environmental Assessment Report demonstrates how National Grid intends to meet its environmental responsibilities and mitigate any environmental effects, covering all elements of the Proposed Project (including any impacts arising from underground cabling works). 6.1.4 The main overriding considerations of the Proposed Project are its significant environmental benefits from the conservation and enhancement of landscape and visual features that will be provided to the surrounding area. The use of a Management Plan will ensure that the temporary diversion of the Trans Pennine Trail would see the adoption of best practice construction techniques and approaches, while compensation discussions with landowners will minimise any potential effects so that no significant effects are predicted. 6.1.5 The Proposed Project is in accordance with the provisions of Government guidance as well as those policies of relevance within the Development Plan and this Statement demonstrates how the Proposed Project provides overriding benefits to the surrounding area. Consequently, it is considered that it has been fully justified and that there are no sound planning considerations why permission should not be granted.

415000 415500 416000 416500 417000 417500 418000 418500

Overview 0 0 0 4 0 4

Legend Site Boundary 0 0

5 Woodhead Tunnel 3 0

4 Local Strategic Highway (T5, T1) Existing Railway Lines and Stations Green Space (GS1) Safeguarded Former Railway (T2) Greenway (GS2) Green Belt (GB1) Biodiversity or Geological Interest Site (BIO1) 0

0 National Park 0 3 0 4 0 0 5 2 0 4

REPRODUCED FROM ORDNANCE SURVEY MAPS, BY PERMISSION OF THE ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY'S STATIONARY OFFICE. © CROWN COPYRIGHT ORDNANCE SURVEY. NATIONAL GRID ELECTRICITY - 100024241. NATIONAL GRID GAS -100024886

0 00 First Draft - inc updated PDNPA NH HC SR 11/07/2019 0

0 Rev Description Cre'd Chk'd App'd Date 2 0 4

Master Scheme No: Sub-Scheme No: Site: - - Peak District

Scheme Name: 0

0 Visual Impact Provision (VIP) 5

1 Peak District (East) Project. 0 4 Document Title: Figure 1: Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Local Plan Policies Map (2019)

Created by: Date: Checked by: Date: Approved by: Date: N Hogben 11/07/2019 H Cross 11/07/2019 S.Rotherham 11/07/2019 Development Eng: Document Type: Scale: Format: Sheet(s): Rev:

0 - 1:12,500 A3 1 of 1 00 0

0 National Grid Document Number: 1 0

4 - © RSK Group plc. FEED Document Number: Metres This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 [ - We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to use by other parties.

Document location P:\660000 - EPD Projects\660952 National Grid VIP\11 GIS\PKD_EIA_Fig1_Local_Plan_Barnsley_MBC_2019.mxd Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 415000 415500 416000 416500 417000 417500 418000 418500

Overview 0 0 0 4 0 4

Legend Site Boundary 0

0 Woodhead Tunnel 5 3

0 Safeguarded Railway (Policy T5) 4 Peak District National Park Natural Area Section3 Moorland (Policy L1/DMC2) Moorland Slopes and Cloughs (Policy L1/DMC1) Slopes and Valleys with Woodland (Policy L1/DMC1) Open Moors (Policy L1/DMC1) Enclosed Gritstone (Policy L1/DCM1) 0

0 Environment Agency Flood Zone 3 0 3

0 Environment Agency Flood Zone 2 4 0 0 5 2 0 4

0 00 First Draft NH HC SR 11/07/2019 0

0 Rev Description Cre'd Chk'd App'd Date 2 0 4

Master Scheme No: Sub-Scheme No: Site: - - Peak District

Scheme Name: 0

0 Visual Impact Provision (VIP) 5

1 Peak District (East) Project. 0 4 Document Title: Figure 2: Peak District National Park Authority Policies Map (2019)

Created by: Date: Checked by: Date: Approved by: Date: N Hogben 11/07/2019 H Cross 11/07/2019 S.Rotherham 11/07/2019 Development Eng: Document Type: Scale: Format: Sheet(s): Rev:

0 - 1:12,500 A3 1 of 1 00 0

0 National Grid Document Number: 1 0

Document location P:\660000 - EPD Projects\660952 National Grid VIP\11 GIS\PKD_EIA_Fig2_Peak_District_NPA.mxd Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

APPENDIX A NATIONAL GRID ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY POLICY

Environmental Sustainability Policy

“It is essential to me as CEO that we operate We take our responsibilities for Environmental in an environmentally sustainable way Sustainability very seriously. As a minimum, because we know it’s the right thing we will meet our compliance obligations. to do – for society, the environment However, we aspire to world class performance. and our business. Scope Everyone at National Grid has a role to play in Our Environmental Sustainability Policy applies proactively supporting the environment in the to you if you are employed by, or carry out work way we work. We must also be honest and on behalf of any National Grid business. drive for better performance in the way we respond and learn when things don’t go right”. We commit to • Identifying our environmental risks, including climate change, and developing plans to mitigate them. • Protecting the environment by ensuring prevention John Pettigrew, Chief Executive of pollution is a key consideration in the design of all our assets. • Using resources more efficiently by using sustainable materials and reducing waste. • Identifying opportunities to use alternatives to hazardous materials. • Seeking ways to enhance the natural value of the areas we work for the benefit of local communities and the environment. • Ensuring all our employees have the training, skills, knowledge and resources necessary to achieve the requirements of our internal standards. • Setting expectations of those who work on our behalf to demonstrate the same commitment to the environment as we do and working with our supply chain to contribute to the delivery of ‘Our Contribution’ targets. • Continually improving the Environmental Management System by reviewing and challenging our performance using feedback from stakeholders and benchmarking against our contemporaries. For details on the minimum performance requirements for National Grid employees to meet this policy, see our Environmental Sustainability BMS standard in the National Grid book Date: 14 March 2019. Version 1.0 Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

APPENDIX B PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

APPENDIX B: PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT

Barnsley Local Plan (BMBC, 2019) Policy SD1 (Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development) states that:

‘When considering development proposals we will take a positive approach that reflects the presumption in favour of sustainable development contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. We will work proactively with applicants jointly to find solutions which mean that proposals can be approved wherever possible, and to secure development that improves the economic, social and environmental conditions in the area.’ Policy HE1 (The Historic Environment) states that:

‘We will positively encourage developments which will help in the management, conservation, understanding and enjoyment of Barnsley’s historic environment, especially for those assets which are at risk. (…)’ Policy HE2 (Heritage Statements and general application procedures) states that:

‘Proposals that are likely to affect known heritage assets or sites where it comes to light there is potential for the discovery of unrecorded heritage assets will be expected to include a description of the heritage significance of the site and its setting. (…)’ Policy HE6 (Archaeology) states that:

‘Applications for development on sites where archaeological remains may be present must be accompanied by an appropriate archaeological assessment (including a field evaluation if necessary) that must include the following: • Information identifying the likely location and extent of the remains, and the nature of the remains; • An assessment of the significance of the remains; and • Consideration of how the remains would be affected by the proposed development. Where preservations of the remains are not justified, permission will be conditional upon:- • Archaeological recording of the evidence (including evidence that might be destroyed), whether buried remains or part of a standing structure or building; • Analysis of the information gathered; • Interpretation of the results gained; • Public dissemination of the results; and • Deposition of the resulting archive with an appropriate museum or archive service.’ Policy GB1 (Protection of Green Belt) states that:

‘The general extent of the Green Belt is set out on the Key Diagram. The detailed boundaries are defined on the Policies Map. Green Belt will be protected from inappropriate development in accordance with national planning policy.’ Policy GS2 (Green Ways and Public Rights of Way) states that:

‘We will protect Green Ways and Public Rights of Way from development that may affect their character or function. Where development affects an existing Green Way or Public Right of Way it must: • Protect the existing route within the development; or

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• Include an equally convenient and attractive alternative route. Where new development is close to a Green Way or Public Right of Way it may be required to: • Provide a link to the existing route; and/or • Improve an existing route; and/or • Contribute to a new route. In some cases, we will ask developers to make a financial contribution to meet these requirements in accordance with the Infrastructure and Planning Obligations Policy.’ Policy BIO1 (Biodiversity and Geodiversity) states that:

‘Development will be expected to conserve and enhance the biodiversity and geological features of the borough by: • Protecting and improving habitats, species, sites of ecological value and sites of geological value with particular regard to designated wildlife and geological sites of international, national and local significance, ancient woodland and species and habitats of principal importance identified via Section 41 of the Natural Environment & Rural Communities Act 2006 (for list of the species and habitats of principal importance) and in the Barnsley Biodiversity Action Plan. • Maximising biodiversity and geodiversity opportunities in and around new developments. • Conserving and enhancing the form, local character and distinctiveness of the boroughs natural assets such as the river corridors of the Don, the Dearne and Dove as natural floodplains and important strategic wildlife corridors. • Proposals will be expected to have followed the national mitigation hierarchy (avoid, mitigate, compensate) which is used to evaluate the impacts of a development on biodiversity interest. • Protecting ancient and veteran trees where identified. • Encouraging provision of biodiversity enhancements. Development which may harm a biodiversity or geological feature or habitat, including ancient woodland and aged or veteran trees found outside ancient woodland, will not be permitted unless effective mitigation and/or compensatory measures can be ensured. Development which adversely effects a European Site will not be permitted unless there is no alternative option and there are imperative reasons of overriding public interest (IROPI).’ Policy LC1 (Landscape Character) states that:

‘Development will be expected to retain and enhance the character and distinctiveness of the individual Landscape Character area in which it is located (as set out in the Landscape Character Assessment of Barnsley Borough 2002 and any subsequent amendments). Development which would be harmful to the special qualities of the Peak District National Park will not be allowed.’ Policy CC1 (Climate Change) states that:

‘We will seek to reduce the causes of and adapt to the future impacts of climate change by: • Giving preference to development of previously developed land in sustainable locations;

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• Promoting the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through sustainable design and construction techniques; • Locating and designing development to reduce the risk of flooding; • Promoting the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS); • Promoting and supporting the delivery of renewable and low carbon energy; and • Promoting investment in Green Infrastructure to promote and encourage biodiversity gain.’ Policy CC2 (Sustainable Design and Construction) states that:

‘Development will be expected to minimise resource and energy consumption through the inclusion of sustainable design and construction features, where this is technically feasible and viable. All non-residential development will be expected, to achieve a minimum standard of BREEAM ‘Very Good’ (or any future national equivalent). This should be supported by preliminary assessments at planning application stage.’ Policy CC3 (Flood Risk) states that:

‘The extent and impact of flooding will be reduced by: • Not permitting new development where it would be at an unacceptable risk of flooding from any sources of flooding, or would give rise to flooding elsewhere; • Ensuring that in the Functional Floodplain (Flood Zone 3b), only water compatible development or essential infrastructure (subject to the flood risk exception test) will be allowed. In either case it must be demonstrated that there would not be a harmful effect on the ability of this land to store floodwater; • Requiring developers with proposals in Flood Zones 2 and 3 to provide evidence of the sequential test and exception test where appropriate; • Requiring site-specific Flood Risk Assessments (FRAs) for proposals over 1 hectare in Flood Zone 1 and all proposals in Flood Zones 2 and 3; • Expecting proposals over 1000 m2 floor space or 0.4 hectares in Flood Zone 1 to demonstrate how the proposal will make a positive contribution to reducing or managing flood risk; and • Expecting all development proposals on brownfield sites to reduce surface water run- off by at least 30% and development on greenfield sites to maintain or reduce existing run-off rates requiring development proposals to use Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in accordance with policy CC4; and • Using flood resilient design in areas of high flood risk.’ Policy CC4 (Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)) states that:

‘All major development1 will be expected to use SuDS to manage surface water drainage, unless it can be demonstrated that all types of SuDS are inappropriate. (…) To enable the Council to determine the suitability of a proposed SuDS scheme:

1 as defined in Article 2(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 and subsequent updates

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

• Outline Planning applications must be supported by a conceptual drainage plan and SuDS design statement; and • Detailed Planning applications must be supported by a detailed drainage plan and SuDS design statement, which should contain information on how the SuDS will operate, be managed and maintained for the lifetime of the development.’ Policy CC5 (Water Resource Management) states that:

‘To conserve and enhance the Boroughs water resources proposals will be supported which: a. Do not result in the deterioration of water courses and which conserve and enhance: i. The natural geomorphology of water courses; ii. Water quality; and iii. iii. The ecological value of the water environment, including watercourse corridors. b. Make positive progress towards achieving “good” status or potential under the Water Framework Directive in the boroughs surface and ground water bodies; c. Manage water demand and improve water efficiency through appropriate water conservation techniques including rainwater harvesting and grey-water recycling; and Dispose of surface water appropriately and improve water quality through the incorporation of SuDS, in accordance with Policy CC4.’ Policy CL1 (Contaminated and Unstable Land) states that:

‘Where the future users or occupiers of a development would be affected by contamination or stability issues, or where contamination may present a risk to the water environment, proposals must be accompanied by a report which: • shows that investigations have been carried out to work out the nature and extent of contamination or stability issues and the possible effect it may have on the development and its future users, the natural and historic environment; and • sets out detailed measures to allow the development to go ahead safely, including, as appropriate: o removing the contamination; o treating the contamination; o protecting or separating the development from the effects of the contamination; and o addressing land stability issues resulting from former coal mining activities. Where measures are needed to allow the development to go ahead safely, these will be required as a condition of any planning permission.’ Policy Poll1 (Pollution Control and Protection) states that:

‘Development will be expected to demonstrate that it is not likely to result, directly or indirectly, in an increase in air, surface water and groundwater, noise, smell, dust, vibration, light or other pollution which would unacceptably affect or cause a nuisance to the natural and built environment or to people. We will not allow development of new housing or other environmentally sensitive development where existing air pollution, noise, smell, dust, vibration, light or other pollution levels are unacceptable and there is no reasonable prospect that these can be mitigated against.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Developers will be expected to minimise the effects of any possible pollution and provide mitigation measures where appropriate.’ Policy T1 (Accessibility Priorities) states that:

‘Working with city region partners and other stakeholders transport investment will be set out in Transport Strategy programmes focused on development-transport corridors as shown in the Accessibility Priorities diagram below to: A. Improve sustainable transport and circulation in the Accessibility Improvement Zone (AIZ) area particularly between Principal Towns. B. Implement transport network improvements as supported by evidence from modelling, feasibility studies, consultation, surveys, community engagement etc. C. Facilitate sustainable transport links to and from existing and proposed employment, interchange, community and leisure and tourism facilities in the borough, including provision for car parking and enhancing the non car role of the transport corridor shown on the Accessibility Priorities diagram as ‘potential enhanced road based public transport corridor'. D. Promote high quality public transport linking the AIZ to significant places of business, employment and national / international interchange in the Leeds - Sheffield City Region corridor including neighbouring Wakefield, Kirklees, Doncaster, Sheffield and Rotherham. E. Improve direct public transport and freight links to London, Manchester, other Core Cities, national / international interchanges and the Humber ports.’ Policy T2 (Safeguarding of Former Railway Lines) states that:

‘We will safeguard land within and adjacent to existing and historical rail alignments to accommodate the potential reinstatement of former strategic railway lines. Their historical routes will be shown on the Policies Map. Where it is not possible to use the original alignment we will work with our delivery partners to identify any appropriate alternative routes.’ Policy T3 (New Development and Sustainable Travel) states that:

New development will be expected to: • Be located and designed to reduce the need to travel, be accessible to public transport and meet the needs of pedestrians and cyclists; • Provide at least the minimum levels of parking for cycles, motorbikes, scooters, mopeds and disabled people set out in the relevant Supplementary Planning Document; • Provide a transport statement or assessment in line with guidance set out in the National Planning Policy Framework and guidance including where appropriate regard for cross boundary local authority impacts; and • Provide a travel plan statement or a travel plan in accordance with guidance set out in the National Planning Policy Framework including where appropriate regard for cross boundary local authority impacts. Travel plans will be secured through a planning obligation or a planning condition. Where levels of accessibility through public transport, cycling and walking are unacceptable, we will expect developers to take action or make financial contributions in accordance with policy I1. If it is not possible or appropriate for the minimum amount of parking for cycles, motorbikes,

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

scooters and mopeds to be met on site, the developer must provide, or contribute towards, off-site parking, or improve or provide other forms of travel.

Barnsley Trees and Hedgerows SPG (2012) This SPG offers guidance to landowners, architects and builders on how to deal with existing trees and hedgerows on development sites. The SPG advises on statutory legislation, layout of development and protection of trees and hedgerows during development.

Barnsley Walls and Fences SPG18 (2003) In relation to design and appearance the SPG states that:

‘The design, the materials used and the height of the wall or fence should relate to the character of the area (…). The use of less appropriate materials such as block work, concrete panels, perforated blocks and industrial security fencing will often damage the appearance of a property and the area in which it is located. In rural areas, dry stonewalls and hedges (for instance, hawthorn) will usually be most appropriate.’

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Peak District National Park Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2011) Policy GSP1 (Securing national park purposes and sustainable development) states that:

A. All policies must be read in combination. B. All development shall be consistent with the National Park’s legal purposes and duty. C. Where there is an irreconcilable conflict between the statutory purposes, the Sandford Principle will be applied and the conservation and enhancement of the National Park will be given priority. D. Where national park purposes can be secured, opportunities must be taken to contribute to the sustainable development of the area. E. In securing national park purposes major development should not take place within the Peak District National Park other than in exceptional circumstances. Major development will only be permitted following rigorous consideration of the criteria in national policy. F. Where a proposal for major development can demonstrate a significant net benefit to the National Park, every effort to mitigate potential localised harm and compensate for any residual harm to the area’s valued characteristics would be expected to be secured. Policy GSP2 (Enhancing the National Park) states that:

A. ‘Opportunities for enhancing the valued characteristics of the National Park will be identified and acted upon. B. Proposals intended to enhance the National Park will need to demonstrate that they offer significant overall benefit to the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the area. They should not undermine the achievement of other Core Policies. C. When development is permitted, a design will be sought that respects the character of the area, and where appropriate, landscaping and planting schemes will be sought that are consistent with local landscape characteristics and their setting, complementing the locality and helping to achieve biodiversity objectives. D. Opportunities will be taken to enhance the National Park by the treatment or removal of undesirable features or buildings. Work must be undertaken in a manner which conserves the valued characteristics of the site and its surroundings. E. Development in settlements necessary for the treatment, removal or relocation of non- conforming uses to an acceptable site, or which would enhance the valued characteristics of the National Park will be permitted. In such cases a site brief may be necessary to achieve the best mix of uses to secure the conservation and enhancement of the National Park and the most sustainable outcome for the community.’ Policy GSP3 (Development Management Principles) states that:

‘All development must conform to the following principles: Development must respect, conserve and enhance all valued characteristics of the site and buildings that are subject to the development proposal. Particular attention will be paid to: A. impact on the character and setting of buildings. B. scale of development appropriate to the character and appearance of the National Park. C. siting, landscaping and building materials. D. design in accordance with the National Park Authority Design Guide. E. form and intensity of proposed use or activity. F. impact on living conditions of communities.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

G. impact on access and traffic levels. H. use of sustainable modes of transport. I. use of sustainable building techniques. J. ground conditions including any land instability from former mining, quarrying or industrial uses. K. adapting to and mitigating the impact of climate change, particularly in respect of carbon emissions, energy and water demand.’ Policy L1 (Landscape character and valued characteristics) states that:

A. ‘Development must conserve and enhance valued landscape character, as identified in the Landscape Strategy and Action Plan, and other valued characteristics. B. Other than in exceptional circumstances, proposals for development in the Natural Zone will not be permitted.’ Policy L2 (Sites of biodiversity or geodiversity importance) states that:

A. ‘Development must conserve and enhance any sites, features or species of biodiversity importance and where appropriate their setting. B. Other than in exceptional circumstances development will not be permitted where it is Likely to have an adverse impact on any sites, features or species of biodiversity importance or their setting that have statutory designation or are of international or national importance for their biodiversity. C. Development must conserve and enhance any sites or features of geodiversity importance and where appropriate their setting. D. Other than in exceptional circumstances, development will not be permitted where it is likely to have an adverse impact on any sites or features of geodiversity importance or their setting that have statutory designation or are of international or national importance for their geodiversity.’ Policy L3 (Cultural heritage assets of archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic significance) states that:

A. ‘Development must conserve and where appropriate enhance or reveal the significance of archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic assets and their settings, including statutory designations and other heritage assets of international, national, regional or local importance or special interest; B. Other than in exceptional circumstances development will not be permitted where it is likely to cause harm to the significance of any cultural heritage asset of archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic significance or its setting, including statutory designations or other heritage assets of international, national, regional or local importance or special interest; C. Proposals for development will be expected to meet the objectives of any strategy, wholly or partly covering the National Park, that has, as an objective, the conservation and where possible the enhancement of cultural heritage assets. This includes, but is not exclusive to, the Cultural Heritage Strategy for the Peak District National Park and any successor strategy.’ Policy CC1 (Climate change mitigation and adaptation) states that:

‘In order to build in resilience to and mitigate the causes of climate change all development must: A. Make the most efficient and sustainable use of land, buildings and natural resources.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

B. Take account of the energy hierarchy by: I. reducing the need for energy; II. using energy more efficiently; III. supplying energy efficiently; and IV. using low carbon and renewable energy. C. Be directed away from flood risk areas, and seek to reduce overall risk from flooding within the National Park and areas outside it, upstream and downstream. D. Achieve the highest possible standards of carbon reductions. E. Achieve the highest possible standards of water efficiency. In all new and replacement housing, other than affordable housing of less than 3 units, a minimum sustainability standard, equivalent to that required by the government of affordable housing, shall be achieved unless the applicant provides evidence to demonstrate that it is not viable for a particular development. Non-residential major development above 1000m² floorspace must achieve a Buildings Emissions Rate at least 10% less than the Target Emissions Rate.’ Policy CC3 (Waste management) states that:

‘The management of domestic, industrial and commercial waste must satisfy the following principles: A. The National Park Authority will work with the Waste Collection and Disposal Authorities and local communities to promote sustainable management of waste through the waste hierarchy. B. New, expanded or replacement large scale facilities will not be permitted. C. Small scale waste facilities may be permitted to serve local communities where they are in accordance with or do not undermine the strategy and approach of the relevant Municipal Waste Management Strategy. Such schemes should meet only the need of the community and must not involve importation of waste from outside that community. D. The National Park Authority will require the appropriate restoration and after-use of waste sites so that they can contribute to the recreation and biodiversity value of the National Park. E. Construction and demolition waste must be managed and re-used on site. Where there may be significant environmental risk to flora, fauna, local communities or the water environment, an appropriate off-site disposal option will be required.’ Policy CC5 (Flood risk and water conservation) states that:

A. ‘Development proposals which may have a harmful impact upon the functionality of floodwater storage, or surface water conveyance corridors, or which would otherwise unacceptably increase flood risk, will not be permitted unless net benefits can be secured for increased floodwater storage and surface water management from compensatory measures. B. Where flood management schemes are proposed to reduce the risk of flooding to established material assets, they should wherever possible secure wider benefits for the natural environment, such as habitat creation or landscape enhancement. C. Development which increases roof and hard surface area must include adequate measures such as Sustainable Drainage Systems to deal with the run-off of surface water. Such measures must not increase the risk of a local water course flooding.

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

D. New development must allow an appropriate set-back distance for adequate maintenance of watercourses.’ Policy T5 (Managing the demand for rail, and reuse of former railway routes) states that:

A. ‘Land, tunnels and bridges will be safeguarded for future rail use (including heavy rail, light rail and guided bus) for the following schemes: I. Enhancement of the Hope Valley line; II. Re-instatement of the former Woodhead and Matlock – Buxton railways. B. Irrespective of the safeguarding of land for schemes, none are accepted in principle. All proposals will be assessed on their merits and will be subject of rigorous examination including the continuity of the Trans Pennine Trail and Monsal Trail as required by policy T6.’ Policy T6 (Routes for walking, cycling and horse riding, and waterways) states that:

A. ‘The Rights of Way network will be safeguarded from development, and wherever appropriate enhanced to improve connectivity, accessibility and access to transport interchanges. This may include facilitating attractive safe pedestrian and cycle routes between new residential or industrial developments and the centre of settlements. Where a development proposal affects a Right of Way, every effort will be made to accommodate the definitive route or provide an equally good or better alternative. B. The Manifold, Tissington and High Peak Trails, and other long distance routes, will be protected from development that conflicts with their purpose. The continuity of the Trans Pennine Trail and the Monsal Trail will be retained, irrespective of any future rail use, by realignment if required. C. Wherever appropriate, disused railway lines will be used for walking, cycling and equestrian use until such time as a railway scheme is granted. D. The Huddersfield Narrow Canal will be protected as an inland waterway.’

B10

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Peak District National Park Authority Development Management Polices: Part 2 of the Local Plan for the Peak District National Park (May 2019) Policy DMC1 (Conservations and enhancement of nationally significant landscapes) states that:

‘A. In countryside beyond the edge of settlements listed in Core Strategy policy DS1, any development proposal with a wide scale landscape impact must provide a landscape assessment with reference to the Landscape Strategy and Action Plan. The assessment must be proportionate to the proposed development and clearly demonstrate how valued landscape character, including natural beauty, biodiversity, cultural heritage features and other valued characteristics will be conserved and, where possible, enhanced taking into account:

(ii) any cumulative impact of existing or proposed development including outside the National Park boundary; and

(iii) the effect of the proposal on the landscape and, if necessary, the scope to modify it to ensure a positive contribution to landscape character.

B. Where a development has potential to have significant adverse impact on the purposes for which the area has been designated (e.g. by reason of its nature, scale and setting) the Authority will consider the proposal in accordance with major development tests set out in national policy.’

Policy DMC3 (Siting, design, layout and landscaping) states that:

‘A. Where development is acceptable in principle, it will be permitted provided that its detailed treatment is of a high standard that respects, protects and where possible enhances the natural beauty, quality and visual amenity of the landscape, including the wildlife and cultural heritage that contribute to the distinctive sense of place.’

Policy DMC5 (Assessing the impact of development on designated and non-designated heritage assets and their settings) states that:

‘A. Planning applications for development affecting a heritage asset, including its setting must clearly demonstrate:

(i) its significance including how any identified features of value will be conserved and where possible enhanced; and

(ii) why the proposed development and related works are desirable or necessary.

B. The supporting evidence must be proportionate to the significance of the asset. It may be included as part of a Heritage Statement or Design and Access Statement where relevant.

C. Proposals likely to affect heritage assets with archaeological and potential archaeological interest should be supported by appropriate information that identifies the impacts or a programme of archaeological works to a methodology approved by the Authority.

D. Non-designated heritage assets of archaeological interest demonstrably of equivalent significance to Scheduled Monuments will be considered in accordance with policies for designated heritage assets.

E. If applicants fail to provide adequate or accurate detailed information to show the effect of the development on the significance, character and appearance of the heritage asset and its setting, the application will be refused.

F. Development of a designated or non-designated heritage asset will not be permitted if it would result in any harm to, or loss of, the significance, character and appearance of a heritage asset (from its alteration or destruction, or from development within its setting), unless:

B11

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

(i) for designated heritage assets, clear and convincing justification is provided, to the satisfaction of the Authority, that the:

a) substantial harm or loss of significance is necessary to achieve substantial public benefits that outweigh that harm or loss; or

b) in the case of less than substantial harm to its significance, the harm is weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its optimum viable use.

(ii) for non-designated heritage assets, the development is considered by the Authority to be acceptable following a balanced judgement that takes into account the significance of the heritage asset.’

Policy DMC7 (Listed Buildings) states that:

‘A. Planning applications for development affecting a Listed Building and/or its setting should be determined in accordance with policy DMC5 and clearly demonstrate:

(i) how their significance will be preserved; and

(ii) why the proposed development and related works are desirable or necessary.

B. Development will not be permitted if applicants fail to provide adequate or accurate detailed information to show the effect on the significance and architectural and historic interest of the Listed Building and its setting and any curtilage listed features.

C. Development will not be permitted if it would:

(i) adversely affect the character, scale, proportion, design, detailing of, or materials used in the Listed Building; or

(ii) result in the loss of or irreversible change to original features or other features of importance or interest.

D. In particular, development will not be permitted if it would directly, indirectly or cumulatively lead to:

(i) removal of original walls, stairs, or entrances, or subdivision of large interior spaces;

(ii) removal, alteration or unnecessary replacement of structural elements including walls, roof structures, beams and floors;

(iii) the unnecessary removal, alteration or replacement of features such as windows, doors, fireplaces and plasterwork;

(iv) the loss of curtilage features which complement the character and appearance of the Listed Building (e.g. boundary walls, railings or gates);

(v) repairs or alterations involving materials, techniques and detailing inappropriate to a Listed Building;

(vi) the replacement of traditional features other than with like for like, authentic or original materials and using appropriate techniques;

(vii) extensions to the front of Listed Buildings;

B12

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

(viii) extensions of more than one storey to the rear of listed small houses or terraced properties;

(ix) inappropriate impact on the setting of the Listed Building.unless justified to the satisfaction of the Authority, that the proposed changes, loss or irreversible damage, and/or addition of new features to the Listed Building and its setting are:

a) less than substantial in terms of impact on the character and significance of the Listed Building and its setting; and

b) off-set by the public benefit from making the changes, including enabling optimum viable use,and net enhancement to the Listed Building and its setting.

E. Where change to a Listed Building is acceptable, an appropriate record of the building will be required to a methodology approved in writing by the Authority prior to any works commencing.’

Policy DMC11 (Safeguarding, recording and enhancing nature conservation interests) states that:

‘A. Proposals should aim to achieve net gains to biodiversity or geodiversity as a result of development. In considering whether a proposal conserves and enhances sites, features or species of wildlife, geological or geomorphological importance all reasonable measures must be taken to avoid net loss by demonstrating that in the below order of priority the following matters have been taken into consideration:

(i) enhancement proportionate to the development;

(ii) adverse effects have been avoided;

(iii) the ‘do nothing’ option and alternative sites that cause less harm;

(iv) appropriate mitigation; and

(v) in rare cases, as a last resort, compensation measures to offset loss.

B. Details of appropriate safeguards and enhancement measures for a site, feature or species of nature conservation importance which could be affected by the development must be provided, in line with the Biodiversity Action Plan and any action plan for geodiversity sites, including provision for the beneficial future management of the interests. Development will not be permitted if applicants fail to provide adequate or accurate detailed information to show the impact of a development proposal on a site, feature or species including:

(i) an assessment of the nature conservation importance of the site; and

(ii) adequate information about the special interests of the site; and

(iii) an assessment of the direct and indirect effects of the development; and

(iv) details of any mitigating and/or compensatory measures and details setting out the degree to which net gain in biodiversity has been sought; and

(v) details of provisions made for the beneficial future management of the nature conservation interests of the site. Where the likely success of these measures is uncertain, development will not be permitted.

C. For all sites, features and species development proposals must also consider:

B13

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

(i) cumulative impacts of other developments or proposals; and

(ii) the setting of the development in relation to other features of importance, taking into account historical, cultural and landscape context.’

Policy DMC12 (Sites, features or species of wildlife, geological or geomorphological importance) states that:

‘A. For Internationally designated or candidate sites, or European Protected Species, the exceptional circumstances where development may be permitted are those where it can be demonstrated that the legislative provisions to protect such sites or species can be fully met. 65 66 67

B. For sites, features or species of national importance 68, exceptional circumstances are those where development is essential:

(i) for the management of those sites, features or species; or

(ii) for the conservation and enhancement of the National Park’s valued characteristics;

(iii) where the benefits of the development at a site clearly outweigh the impacts on the features of the site that make it of special scientific interest and any broader impacts on the national network of SSSIs.

C. For all other sites, features and species 69, development will only be permitted where:

(i) significant harm can be avoided and the conservation status of the population of the species or habitat concerned is maintained; and

(ii) the need for, and the benefits of, the development in that location clearly outweigh any adverse effect.’

Policy DMC13 (Protecting trees, woodland or other landscape features put at risk by development) states that:

‘A. Planning applications should provide sufficient information to enable their impact on trees, woodlands and other landscape features to be properly considered in accordance with ‘BS 5837: 2012 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction – Recommendations’ or equivalent.

B. Trees and hedgerows, including ancient woodland and ancient and veteran trees, which positively contribute, either as individual specimens or as part of a wider group, to the visual amenity or biodiversity of the location will be protected. Other than in exceptional circumstances development involving loss of these features will not be permitted.

C. Development should incorporate existing trees, hedgerows or other landscape features within the site layout. Where this cannot be achieved the onus is on the applicant to justify the loss of trees and/or other features as part of the development proposal.

D. Trees, woodlands and other landscape features should be protected during the course of the development.’

B14

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Policy DMC14 (Pollution and disturbance) states that:

‘A. Development that presents a risk of pollution or disturbance including soil, air, light, water or noise pollution, or odour that could adversely affect any of the following interests will not be permitted unless adequate control measures are put in place to bring the pollution within acceptable limits:

(i) the amenity of neighbours and neighbouring uses; or

(ii) the amenity, tranquillity, biodiversity or other valued characteristics of the area; or

(iii) existing recreation activities; or

(iv) extensive land uses such as forestry and agriculture; or

(v) ecosystem services including water supply, groundwater resources and the water environment;

(vi) established businesses; or

(vii) potential future uses of the land; or

(viii) any nuisance, or harm to the rural character and dark skies of the area, caused by lighting schemes.

B. Development will only be permitted where, upon cessation of a permitted use, the appropriate removal of any pollutants arising from development can be assured.

C. Development affecting a Source Protection Zone, Safeguard Zone or Water Protection Zone must assess any risk to water quality and demonstrate that it will be protected throughout the construction and operational phases of development.’

Policy DMC15 (Contaminated and unstable land) states that:

‘A. Development on land that is known or suspected to be contaminated will be permitted provided that an accredited assessment shows that:

(i) there is no risk to public health arising from any existing contamination; and

(ii) remedial measures (in situ or by safe disposal off-site) can remove any public health risk and make the site fit for its intended use without harm to the valued characteristics of the area including any nature conservation or cultural heritage value.

B. Development on land believed to be unstable, or suspected as being potentially unstable, or likely to become unstable as a result of development will only be permitted where an accredited stability assessment shows that the land:

(i) is stable and will remain so; or

(ii) can be made permanently stable by remedial measures undertaken as part of the development process without harm to the valued characteristics of the area; and

(iii) that development will not affect the stability or safety of neighbouring areas.

C. Necessary remedial measures must be agreed before development commences.’

B15

Visual Impact Provision Peak District (East) Project, Planning Statement

Policy DMT5 (Development affecting a public right of way) states that:

A. Where a development proposal affects the route of a public right of way, either the definitive line of the public right of way should be retained, or, in exceptional circumstances, where retention of the definitive line is not possible, the developer will be required to provide an alternative route that:

(i) is of equal, or preferably, of an improved quality compared to the original; and

(ii) has similar or improved surface appropriate to its setting; and

(iii) wherever appropriate, is of benefit to users with special needs, including those with disabilities; and

(iv) is available before the definitive route is affected or, if this is not possible, until the development is complete, a suitable temporary route is available before the definitive route is affected; and

(v) is as convenient and visually attractive as the original.

B. Where development occurs, opportunities will be sought to provide better facilities for users of the rights of way network, including, where appropriate, providing links between the development and the rights of way network, including the National Park’s Trail network.

C. Development that would increase vehicular traffic on footpaths, bridleways or byways open to all traffic to the detriment of their enjoyment by walkers and riders will not be permitted unless there are overriding social, economic or environmental conservation benefits arising from the proposal.

D. The development of new routes for walking, cycling and horse riding including multi-user trails will be supported, provided that they conserve and enhance the valued characteristics of the area, and are subject to the following criteria:

(i) they connect into the wider rights of way network; and

(ii) they connect with settlements within and beyond the National Park boundary; and

(iii) they are designed and constructed to an appropriate standard, in keeping with its setting; and

(iv) where it is likely to act as a destination in its own right, that appropriate, new or existing visitor facilities are made available.

In the case of minor improvements to existing or permissive rights of way, (i) and (ii) are unlikely to apply.

Policy DMU2 (New and upgraded utilities services)

‘A. Development of utilities infrastructure will not be permitted unless it is to improve or extend the service to the communities and businesses of the National Park and can be provided without harm to the valued characteristics of the area or to other established uses. Infrastructure and ancillary works or buildings should be located, designed and landscaped to minimise their impact on the built and natural environment, and on any other established activities.

B. Infrastructure services to new development, or improved services to existing uses should be placed underground.’

B16