DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission ID: EM23

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission ID: EM23 Submission ID: EM23 First name: James Wish to speak to submission: Last name: Ryan Yes Address 1: PO Box 36071 Address 2: Merivale City/town: Christchurch Postal Code: 8146 Topic One: Rivers and Drainage Flood Recovery Project: "What approach should we take to managing the flood repairs from the April 2017 floods in the Eastern Bay of Plenty" Option selected: Topic one ~ comments/feedback: Topic two: Public Transport: "How do we fund increased bus services across the region?" Option selected: Topic two ~ comments/feedback: Topic three: Biosecurity: "Are we putting the right level of effort into managing pests across the Bay of Plenty?" Option selected: Topic three ~ comments/feedback: Topic four: Emergency Management: "How should we fund region-wide Civil Defence Emergency Management Services?" Option selected: Topic four ~ comments/feedback: Topic five: Regional Development: "Should we fund infrastructure projects delivered by other organisations?" Option selected: Topic five ~ comments/feedback: Other comments or general feedback: Document submission: See submitter's document submission Document submission name: EM23 New Zealand Farm Environment Trust Funding application or not: Funding application name Friday, 6 April 2018 Bay of Plenty Regional Council LTP Submissions 2018 432 Consultation ID: EM23 Individual or organisation: Organisation Document provider name: New Zealand Farm Environment Trust Document submission name: EM23 New Zealand Farm Environment Trust 433 PO Box 36071 Merivale CHRISTCHURCH 8146 www.nzfeatrust.org.nz Long Term Plan Submissions Bay of Plenty Regional Council PO Box 364 Whakatāne 3158 16 March 2018 Dear Sir/Madam Working in partnership to promote sustainable farming and growing Thank you for the opportunity to submit on the Bay of Plenty Regional Council Long-Term Plan. The New Zealand Farm Environment Trust is a charitable organisation that was established in 2000 to promote sustainable farming and growing. The Trust is funded by our primary sector partners and through the generous support of regional councils throughout the country. Our flagship activity is the Ballance Farm Environment Awards. Through the awards programme, farmers and growers gain independent feedback which they use to improve the sustainability of their business. We also find that entrants feel strongly about the need to share knowledge and positive stories about farming and growing with others. In many cases, entrants have gone on to important leadership roles in which they have championed sustainable farming. One of the strengths of the awards programme is that it is managed regionally by a group of locals passionate about sustainable farming. The Trust’s role is to help provide co-ordination and to be a point of contact with national partners. The Trust is keen to maintain and enhance its partnership with the regional council. We see a number of exciting opportunities to compliment the role of the regional council to promote sustainable farming and growing practices. On behalf of the Ballance Farm Environment Awards Management Committee and Farm Environment Award Trust (for the Bay of Plenty region), I would like to thank you for your ongoing support. We look forward to continuing to work in partnership with the regional council to meet community outcomes. We would like to present our submission at hearings. Yours sincerely James Ryan General Manager Phone 027 324 5517 [email protected] 434 Submission ID: EM24 First name: Roger Wish to speak to submission: Last name: Waugh No Address 1: Address 2: City/town: Postal Code: Topic One: Rivers and Drainage Flood Recovery Project: "What approach should we take to managing the flood repairs from the April 2017 floods in the Eastern Bay of Plenty" Option selected: Topic one ~ comments/feedback: Topic two: Public Transport: "How do we fund increased bus services across the region?" Option selected: Topic two ~ comments/feedback: Topic three: Biosecurity: "Are we putting the right level of effort into managing pests across the Bay of Plenty?" Option selected: Topic three ~ comments/feedback: Topic four: Emergency Management: "How should we fund region-wide Civil Defence Emergency Management Services?" Option selected: Topic four ~ comments/feedback: Topic five: Regional Development: "Should we fund infrastructure projects delivered by other organisations?" Option selected: Topic five ~ comments/feedback: Other comments or general feedback: Document submission: See submitter's document submission Document submission name: EM24 Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group Funding application or not: Funding application name Friday, 6 April 2018 Bay of Plenty Regional Council LTP Submissions 2018 435 Consultation ID: EM24 Individual or organisation: Organisation Document provider name: Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group Document submission name: EM24 Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group 436 Submission to Bay of Plenty Regional Council's Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Submission from the Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group Name: Roger Waugh, Rivers and Drainage Asset Manager Organisation: Bay of Plenty Regional Council's Integrated Catchment Group on behalf of the Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group Email: [email protected] I do not wish to speak to this submission. Comments: This submission relates to Topic One — Rivers and Drainage Flood Recovery Project which considers "What approach should be taken to manage the flood repairs from the April 2017 floods in the eastern Bay of Plenty?" Between 3 and 14 April 2017, the Bay of Plenty was impacted by ex-Tropical Cyclones Debbie and Cook which caused extensive flood damage to the rivers schemes. A total of 520 sites have been identified and costs estimated in the flood recovery project with 39 sites in the Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme. The estimated repair cost of the 39 sites is approximately $1.7 million. At a meeting of the Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group on 19 February 2018, Council staff presented the following two options and the subsequent effects on forecast loans, funding and estimated targeted rates for the scheme: • Option 1 - Carry out all identified repairs as soon as possible. Resulting in a higher rates increase in year one and two and then smaller increases from year three (e.g. 20182019: 5% per ratepayer; 2019-2020: 1% per ratepayer). • Option 2 - Carry out all identified repairs as soon as possible, with rates increases spread out over a longer period (e.g. over the 10 years 2018-2028 - 4% per ratepayer per year). The resulting discussion and feedback from group members was that Option 2 was the preferred option that best meets the needs of the ratepayers of the scheme. It was felt that this option would also be supporting the other schemes more affected by the April 2017 Flood and who are facing larger rate increases for the flood damage repair works. Additional feedback was also received from group members around the increased contribution of stormwater to the scheme from extensive development in Päpämoa and the flooding and stormwater issues in Te Puke; that a classification review of the rating system for the Scheme was required. The current rating system is a whole-of-catchment, land area differential classification system which was adopted in 2002. The need for a classification review for the rivers and drainage schemes has been brought before Council previously in 2011 with the Rivers and Drainage Schemes Rating Investigation Report. The outcomes from the report included: 437 BOPRC ID: A2820326 Recommendation to not move on a rating review until a review is absolutely essential for a particular scheme. Circumstances that would warrant a review include significant changes to the urban/rural area or significant changes to levels of service. Resolutions: Members of the Kaituna Catchment Control Scheme Advisory Group resolved that: A staff submission is prepared to the LTP 2018-2028 on their behalf in support of Option 2. Rates in the Scheme are becoming inequitable (particularly with the Päpämoa/Te Puke contribution to the scheme) and a rating reviewing is required. Rivers and Drainage Asset Manager 438 Submission ID: EM25 First name: Beverley Wish to speak to submission: Last name: Hughes Yes Address 1: PO Box 76 Address 2: City/town: Whakatane Postal Code: 3165 Topic One: Rivers and Drainage Flood Recovery Project: "What approach should we take to managing the flood repairs from the April 2017 floods in the Eastern Bay of Plenty" Option selected: Topic one ~ comments/feedback: Topic two: Public Transport: "How do we fund increased bus services across the region?" Option selected: Topic two ~ comments/feedback: Topic three: Biosecurity: "Are we putting the right level of effort into managing pests across the Bay of Plenty?" Option selected: Topic three ~ comments/feedback: Topic four: Emergency Management: "How should we fund region-wide Civil Defence Emergency Management Services?" Option selected: Topic four ~ comments/feedback: Topic five: Regional Development: "Should we fund infrastructure projects delivered by other organisations?" Option selected: Topic five ~ comments/feedback: Other comments or general feedback: Document submission: See submitter's document submission Document submission name: EM25 Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa Funding application or not: Funding application name Friday, 6 April 2018 Bay of Plenty Regional Council LTP Submissions 2018 439 Consultation ID: EM25 Individual or organisation: Organisation Document
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anglers' Notice for Fish and Game Region Conservation
    ANGLERS’ NOTICE FOR FISH AND GAME REGION CONSERVATION ACT 1987 FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS 1983 Pursuant to section 26R(3) of the Conservation Act 1987, the Minister of Conservation approves the following Anglers’ Notice, subject to the First and Second Schedules of this Notice, for the following Fish and Game Region: Eastern NOTICE This Notice shall come into force on the 1st day of October 2017. 1. APPLICATION OF THIS NOTICE 1.1 This Anglers’ Notice sets out the conditions under which a current licence holder may fish for sports fish in the area to which the notice relates, being conditions relating to— a.) the size and limit bag for any species of sports fish: b.) any open or closed season in any specified waters in the area, and the sports fish in respect of which they are open or closed: c.) any requirements, restrictions, or prohibitions on fishing tackle, methods, or the use of any gear, equipment, or device: d.) the hours of fishing: e.) the handling, treatment, or disposal of any sports fish. 1.2 This Anglers’ Notice applies to sports fish which include species of trout, salmon and also perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only). 1.3 Perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only) are also classed as coarse fish in this Notice. 1.4 Within coarse fishing waters (as defined in this Notice) special provisions enable the use of coarse fishing methods that would otherwise be prohibited. 1.5 Outside of coarse fishing waters a current licence holder may fish for coarse fish wherever sports fishing is permitted, subject to the general provisions in this Notice that apply for that region.
    [Show full text]
  • Heading/Title Aquatic Pest Report 2019
    Aquatic Pest Report 2019 Bay of Plenty Regional Council Environmental Publication 2019/03 FebruaryHeading/title 2019 PreparedSubheading by Freya Ewing and Thomas Bailey (Summer Students) 5Month Quay YearStreet P O Box 364 WhakatānePrepared by NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175-9372 (Print) ISSN: 1179-9471 (Online) Cover photo: Rowan Wells (NIWA) Acknowledgements We would like to thank Hamish Lass, Biosecurity Officer for his support and guidance, and Lucas MacDonald, Biosecurity Officer for his assistance and advice across all advocacy work. Our acknowledgements also go to Greg Corbett and the remainder of the Biosecurity Team at the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, we are grateful for the encouragement and support we received from all of you. We would also like to show our gratitude to Geoff Ewert for his continued commitment to the Rotorua Lakes, in particular with fixing weed cordons and the running of the boat wash station. We are also immensely grateful to Sarah Van Der Boom from Freshwater Biosecurity Partnership Program for her help with data collection. Lastly, we would like to thank Sam Beaumont and the remainder of the team at Ministry for Primary Industries, for the supplying of merchandise and collateral, signage and guidance. BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL TOI MOANA 1 Executive summary Many of New Zealand’s most well-known lakes and rivers can be found in the Bay of Plenty region and are therefore known to attract significant visitor numbers annually. The preservation and protection of these waterways are what attracts so many international and domestic tourists to them. Due to the close proximity of the Bay of Plenty lakes and rivers, and their popularity, they are extremely susceptible to invasive pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Measurements in Lakes Rotorua and Rotoehu 2010 and 2011
    Current measurements in Lakes Rotorua and Rotoehu 2010 and 2011 NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-015 February 2011 NIWA Project: BOP11203 Current measurements in Lakes Rotorua and Rotoehu 2010 and 2011 Max Gibbs Rod Budd Cliff Hart Scott Stephens Aslan Wright-Stow Scott Edhouse NIWA contact/Corresponding author Max Gibbs Prepared for Bay of Plenty Regional Council NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-015 February 2011 NIWA Project: BOP11203 National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Gate 10, Silverdale Road, Hamilton P O Box 11115, Hamilton, New Zealand Phone +64-7-856 7026, Fax +64-7-856 0151 www.niwa.co.nz All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the client. Such permission is to be given only in accordance with the terms of the client's contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Contents Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Methods 2 2.1 Current meters 2 2.2 Lake Rotorua 3 2.3 Lake Rotoehu 4 3. Results and discussion 6 3.1 Lake Rotorua July/August 2010 6 3.1.1 Current velocity 6 3.1.2 Current direction 7 3.1.3 Wind velocity and direction 7 3.1.4 Wind-water coupling 8 3.2 Lake Rotorua November/December 2010 10 3.2.1 Current velocity 12 3.2.2 Current direction 13 3.2.3 Wind velocity and direction 13 3.2.4 Wind-water coupling 15 3.2.5 Water column decoupling 16 3.3 Lake Rotoehu January/February 2011 16 3.3.1 Wind velocity and direction 17 3.3.2 Mid-lake site current velocity and direction 19 3.3.3 Southern lake site current velocity and direction 22 3.3.4 Lake Rotoehu current synthesis 25 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Kerosene Creek 2. Wairua Stream
    1. Kerosene Creek First on our list of hot pools in Rotorua is the world-famous Kerosene Creek. 35 minutes from Rotorua and down a gravel road will take you to the thermal pool and waterfall at Kerosene Creek. The creek is popular not just for its geothermal activity but its beautiful surroundings. Location: 28km south of Rotorua. Take State Highway 5, then travel about 2km down Old Waiotapu Road. 2. Wairua Stream Wairua Stream is a bit harder to get to as you have to get a boat across Lake Tarawera, making it a local’s paradise. It is near Te Rata Bay and is one of the most picturesque hot pools near Rotorua. Location: About 25 minutes out of Rotorua down Spencer Road, Lake Tarawera. By boat, launch at Stoney Point and head straight across Lake Tarawera to the headlands on the right of Mt Tarawera. Go straight through these headlands to where the lake opens. Steer gently to starboard and make for the only beach in this area. 3. Wai-o-Tapu / The Bridge / The Secret Spot When it comes to Rotorua hot pools, it does not get more popular thank this one. Funnily enough, it is supposed to be a secret. Get the remnants from the Wai-O-Tapu geothermal attraction by bathing in the hot pool formed by the hot Wai-O-Tapu stream meeting the cool river. It’s a thermal pool, completely natural and completely free! Location: Just outside the Wai-O-Tapu geothermal park (under the bridge). 30km south of Rotorua just off State Highway 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sedimentation and Drainage History of Haroharo Caldera and the Tarawera River System, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand
    The Sedimentation and Drainage History of Haroharo Caldera and The Tarawera River System, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand Prepared by K A Hodgson and I A Nairn Environment Bay of Plenty Operations Publication 2004/03 August 2004 5 Quay Street P O Box 364 Whakatane NEW ZEALAND ISSN 1176 - 5550 Working with our communities for a better environment Environment Bay of Plenty i Acknowledgements The Department of Conservation (Rotorua Lakes Office) permitted our studies in lake and river reserves. Fletcher Challenge Forests (and its successors) provided detailed contour maps and aerial photographs. Bryan Davy and Hugh Bibby (GNS) provided a pre- publication copy of their paper on seismic imaging in Lake Tarawera. PGSF Contract IANX0201 funded this study. Sedimentation and Drainage History, Tarawera River System Operations Publication 2004/03 Environment Bay of Plenty iii Executive Summary Haroharo caldera has been formed by the coalescence of multiple collapse structures over the last 350 kyr, the latest major collapse accompanying voluminous rhyolite pyroclastic eruptions at ~50 ka. The caldera has formed a sink for precipitation on surrounding catchments, with overflow via the Tarawera River through the Whakatane graben to the sea at ~30 km to NE. Lakes have probably always occupied at least part of the caldera floor, but the early lacustrine history is largely obscured by younger eruptives. Since 26 ka, the Haroharo, Okareka, Rotoma and Tarawera volcanic complexes have grown within the caldera during eleven eruption episodes, confining ten lakes on the caldera margins. Growth of the volcanic complexes has greatly altered drainage paths and ponding areas within and marginal to the caldera, so that the present ~700 km2 caldera catchment area is about half the ~1400 km2 area that drained into the caldera between 26 ka and 9.5 ka.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Bus Information and Form
    2021 Bus Information and Form 2021 Urban Transport (Schoolhopper Buses) www.baybus.co.nz/schoolhopper/schools (for schoolhoppers) www.baybus.co.nz/tauranga-western-bay/tauranga-urban (for urban buses) Tel: 0800 422 928 • 904a – Welcome Bay – Welcome Bay Road (Dairy), James Cook Drive, Victory Street, Osprey Drive, Waitaha Road, Welcome Bay Road (Meadowviews Drive, Vet Clinic, Stand C), Hairini Street • 904b- Ohauiti – Ohauiti Road, Rowesdale Drive, Hollister Lane, Poike Road, Oropi Road, Pyes Pa Road, Greerton Hall • 905a – Bethlehem - St Andrews Drive, Castlewold Drive, Bethlehem Heights, Beaumaris Boulevard, Moffat Road, Bethlehem Road, Carmichael Road, Millers Road, Brookfield Road, Bellevue Road. • 905b Bethlehem – Cambridge Road, Te Reti Views, Bethlehem Road, Cherry Way, Westmoreland Rise, Tall Oaks Way, Bethlehem Country Club, St Michaels Avenue, Westmoreland Rise, Windover Rise, St Pauls Drive. Parents can check whether there is a suitable Schoolhopper service available by entering their home address and Ōtūmoetai Intermediate School into the Tauranga Journey Planner on the BayBus website www.baybus.co.nz and click on the Schoolhopper link or phone 0800 884 880. Rural Transport (Tauranga Transport Network Group Buses) www.schooltransport.org.nz. • 10 – Kaimai area: Kaimai School, Soldiers Rd, Cnr Valley View Road, Old Kaimai Rd, Cnr Ngamuwahine Rd, Cnr Thorne Rd, Country Fare Fruit Shop, Cambridge Road – Cnr of River Oaks Drive, Miles Lane and Westridge Drive. • 11 – Kaimai area: McLaren Falls Road, Omanawa Road, Tomsett Road, Catch bus 10 at meeting point*. • 12 – Kaimai area: Ruahihi Road, Poripori Road, catch bus 10 at meeting point*. • 13 – Kaimai area: Belk Road, Omanawa Rd, State Highway 29/Redwood Lane, catch bus 10 at meeting point*.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Public Works Takings in the Tauranga Moana Inquiry District
    Wai 215 #52 A Comparative Study of Public Works Takings in the Tauranga Moana Inquiry District Wendy Hart · . August 2006 A research report commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal CONTENTS ACKN"OWLEDGEMENTS .............................. ,', ............................... "... ,... ".................. ",.6 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ..... , .......................................................... , ............... 7 I.I.PERSONAL ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. THE CLAIMS ............................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. THE REPORT .............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.1 Backgt:ound to the Tauranga Moana inquiry .......................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.3.3 Structure ............................................................................................................................................... 9 1.4. METHODOLGY ........................................................................................................................................ 10 CHAPTER TWO: OVERVIEW ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ōkareka 21
    Contents Purpose 1 Overview 1 Lake Rotorua 2016-2017 1 Lake Rotoehu 2016-2017 3 Lake Rotoiti 2016-2017 3 Lake Ōkāreka 2016-2017 3 Key achievements 5 Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Annual Water Quality Results 10 Lake Rotorua 13 Lake Rotoehu 17 Lake Rotoiti 19 Lake Ōkareka 21 Actions and Outcomes for Non Deed Lakes 23 Communications and stakeholder engagement update 26 Science update 27 Land Technical Advisory Group 27 Water Quality Technical Advisory Group 27 Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme – DRAFT Annual Report 2016-2017 i Environmental modelling 28 Action Plans and sewage reticulation 28 Financials 29 Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme – DRAFT Annual Report 2016-2017 ii Purpose The purpose of this document is to report progress against the 2016-2017 Annual Work Programme of the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme (the Programme), for the year ending 30 June 2017. This report is in accordance with Clause 5.1 and 5.2 of Deed of Funding with the Crown, for the Programme. In this report, progress made on individual interventions is reported against the Annual Work Programme commitments. The overarching goal of the Deed of Funding Agreement is to meet community aspirations for water quality in the four Deed Funded lakes: Rotoiti, Rotorua, Ōkāreka and Rotoehu. Each of these lakes has a target water quality set by the community in the Bay of Plenty Regional Water and Land Plan. This target water quality is set by Trophic Level Index (TLI) and this report provides an update on the status of water quality across the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes, against the targets set for all lakes, Deed and non-Deed funded.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Rotoehu Action Plan
    Lake Rotoehu Action Plan ISSN 1175 9372 (Print) ISSN 1179 9471 (Online) Environmental Publication 2007/19 November 2007 (As amended April 2011) Lake Rotoehu Action Plan Hearing Panel Decisions 7 November 2007 Environmental Publication 2007/19 Lake Rotoehu Action Plan Environment Bay of Plenty, Rotorua District Council, Te Arawa Lakes Trust i Foreword We are pleased to release the Lake Rotoehu Action Plan, which aims to significantly improve the water quality of Lake Rotoehu through lake restoration actions over the next ten years. Lake Rotoehu is a relatively quiet lake valued for trout fishing, kayaking and some waterskiing. However since 1993 it has suffered major cyanobacterial blooms, and more recently the spread of hornwort beds through much of the shallow areas. Te Arawa value the Te Arawa Lakes and the Lakes' resources as taonga and continue to maintain their spiritual, traditional, cultural and historical relationships with their ancestral lakes. The Action Plan outlines some key actions to improve lake water quality, such as: Land use and land management changes on pastoral land to meet a nutrient loss reduction target. Implementation of Environmental Programmes to protect waterways. Hornwort biomass harvesting. Wetland construction. Rotorua District Council, Environment Bay of Plenty and Te Arawa Lakes Trust look forward to working with the Lake Rotoehu community and landowners on these actions. If these actions are achieved, there is a good chance that Lake Rotoehu could be pulled back from its eutrophic state to become a mesotrophic lake again. A key indicator that this has happened will be a decline in the extent of cyanobacterial blooms that infest the lake during the summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Community Response to Tourism and Change in Rotorua
    Evolving Community Response To Tourism and Change in Rotorua Chrys Horn Researcher, Human Sciences Division, Lincoln University. [email protected] David G Simmons Professor of Tourism, Human Sciences Division, Lincoln University. [email protected] John R Fairweather Principal Research Officer in the Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University. [email protected] February 2000 ISSN 1174-670X Tourism Research and Education Centre (TREC) Report No. 14 Lincoln University Contents LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x SUMMARY xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................1 1.2 Report Structure .............................................................................3 CHAPTER 2 METHODS..............................................................................................5 2.1 Qualitative Methods.......................................................................5 2.2 Quantitative Survey........................................................................6 2.3 Weighting.......................................................................................9 2.4 Presentation....................................................................................9 2.5 Limitations of Research ...............................................................10 CHAPTER 3 THE ROTORUA CONTEXT: HISTORY AND SOCIAL PATTERNS..........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • There's a Lot More To
    THERE’S A LOT MORE TO FISH&GAMENZ MAGAZINE AND ONLINE THAN JUST THE SPECIAL ISSUES issueninetyfive FISH & GAME NEW ZEALAND New Zealand $9.90 incl GST issueninetysix FISH & GAME NEW ZEALAND THE AUTHORITY ON FRESHWATER FISHING AND GAME BIRD HUNTING IN NEW ZEALAND New Zealand $9.90 incl GST issue ninetyseven New Zealand $9.90 incl GST BROADEN YOUR ANGLING HORIZONS The Best Month For Fishing ISSUE NINETY FIVE As Good As It Gets Capturing Aerial Antics Moods Of The Tutaekuri JANUARY 2017 22/12/16 2:57 pm ISSUE NINETY SIX So You ThinkYou Can Cast F&G cover Iss95.indd 1 The Fortuity Of Fly Fishing APRIL 2017 Moods Of Bridges I SSUE N 4/04/17 12:34 pm We’re Fishing I Where NETY Red Rock Trout SEVEN F&G cover Iss96.indd 1 Post-Season Shakedown JULY Cracking The Canal Code 2017 Brothers In Arms CATCH THE OTHER FOUR & DON’T MISS OUT! Check out the latest subscription deal online at www.fishandgamenz.co.nz - today! BDMAREVOLUTION_ J000140 J000140_advert.indd 1 17/07/17 3:05 pm Fish & Game 1 2 3 5 4 6 Check www.fishandgame.org.nz for details of regional boundaries Code of Conduct ....................................................................... 4 National Sports Fishing Regulations ..................................... 5 First Schedule ............................................................................ 7 1. Northland ............................................................................ 11 2. Auckland/Waikato ............................................................ 14 3. Eastern .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Island
    176 deg. 00’ 05’ E. Long 176 deg. 10’ 15’ 176 deg. 20’ E E 000 GEOLOGICAL LEGEND 000 70 10 27 AGE 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 7980 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 8990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 9900 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 28 64 00 000 N 64 00 000 N Sand, silt and gravel of modern streams fa fo Fixed foredunes fo tm 99 99 Moving dune sand fm fa HOLOCENE fa fa 35’ fa Peat fs 98 98 10 ka tm tm tm Fluvial terrace deposits post-dating the Hamilton Ash tt fs fa 97 97 Fluvial terrace deposits post-dating the Waiteariki Ignimbrite: Matua Subgroup fluviatile sands and gravels, lignites, estuarine tm sands, lacustrine silts; Pahoia Tephras fa 35’ v fa v Mamaku Ignimbrite: v v v v pink to grey, partially welded crystal-poor ignimbrite, v v tp Matakana Island mav with vapour-phase altered pumice v v tm v 96 96 Waimakariri Ignimbrite: fa tm pale grey, partially welded, pumice-rich ignimbrite, with wk fo white to pale brown pumice containing plagioclase, quartz and hypersthene Aongatete Te Ranga Ignimbrite: PLEISTOCENE mb whitish grey, non-welded, crystal- and pumice-poor ignimbrite, tr 95 95 containing small pinkish-grey pumice, and lithics of obsidian and rhyolite tp Te Puna Ignimbrite light-grey, partially welded, crystal- and pumice-rich tp ignimbrite, with crystals of plagioclase, quartz and hornblende tm fa fa Ongatiti Ignimbrite: fa 94 94 whitish grey, partially to densely welded, crystal- and pumice-rich fo ignimbrite with crystal clots of plagioclase, quartz, hornblende and ot hypersthene 1.8 Ma Papamoa Ignimbrite fm Bay of Plenty buff brown, partially welded, crystal- and pumice-rich ignimbrite; fa lower unit contains andesitic (dark grey) to rhyolitic (whitish-grey) pumice; pa upper unit is rhyolitic.
    [Show full text]