DOCSLIB.ORG

The National Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (Pfra)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The National Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (Pfra) THE NATIONAL PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (PFRA) OVERVIEW REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION AUGUST 2011 2019/RP/001/B FLOOD RELIEF & RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION ENGINEERING SERVICES OFFICE OF PUBLIC WORKS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Office of Public Works (OPW) would like to acknowledge and thank all those who have contributed towards the preparation of the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA), including: Bord Gáis Dept. of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Dept. of Environment, Community and Local Authorities o National Monuments o National Parks and Wildlife Service Eircom Environmental Protection Agency ESB Geological Survey of Ireland Health Service Executive National Roads Authority Waterways Ireland The OPW also acknowledges those who have undertaken, or assisted with, the technical assessments that have provided information to enable the PFRA to be undertaken, namely Bird Watch Ireland, Compass Informatics, HR Wallingford and RPS. The OPW would in particular like to thank consultants Mott MacDonald who have worked closely with the OPW in the development and implementation of the PFRA, as well as undertaking many of technical assessments. CONTENTS GLOSSARY 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1 1.1. PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (PFRA) ............................ 1 1.1.1. The ‘Floods’ Directive ........................................................................... 1 1.1.2. The CFRAM Studies ............................................................................... 2 1.2. PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE PFRA ................................................ 2 2. PFRA PROCESS ................................................................................................. 3 2.1. OVERVIEW OF PFRA APPROACH ........................................................... 3 2.2. FLOOD RISK ................................................................................................ 3 2.3. FLOOD HAZARD – SOURCES OF FLOODING ........................................ 4 2.4. CONSEQUENCES OF FLOODING ............................................................. 4 3. HISTORIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 5 3.1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 5 3.2. AVAILABLE HISTORIC FLOOD INFORMATION .................................. 5 3.3. NATURAL SOURCES OF FLOOD RISK .................................................... 6 3.3.1. Defining Spatial Areas for Analysis ....................................................... 6 3.3.2. Historic Hazard ..................................................................................... 6 3.3.3. Historic Risk........................................................................................... 7 3.4. INFRASTRUCTURAL SOURCES OF FLOOD RISK ................................. 8 3.4.1. Local Authority Infrastructure ............................................................... 8 3.4.2. ESB Infrastructure ................................................................................. 9 3.4.3. Waterways Ireland Infrastructure .......................................................... 9 3.5. USE OF HISTORIC HAZARD AND RISK OUTCOMES ........................... 9 4. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 11 4.1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 11 4.2. INDICATIVE FLOOD MAPPING ............................................................. 11 4.2.1. Indicative Fluvial Flood Mapping ....................................................... 12 4.2.2. Indicative Seawater Flood Mapping .................................................... 14 4.2.3. Indicative Groundwater Flood Mapping ............................................. 14 4.2.4. Indicative Pluvial Flood Mapping ....................................................... 15 4.2.5. Tsunami Floods .................................................................................... 16 4.2.6. Infrastructural Sources of Flooding .................................................... 17 4.3. POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................... 17 4.4. INDICATIVE FLOOD RISK ANALYSIS .................................................. 18 4.4.1. General Methodology .......................................................................... 18 4.4.2. Describing Flood Risk ......................................................................... 19 4.4.3. Flood Risk for Point Receptors ............................................................ 20 4.4.4. Flood Risk to the Environment ............................................................ 20 4.4.5. Flood Risk to Agriculture..................................................................... 21 4.4.6. Flood Risk to Roads and Rail .............................................................. 21 4.4.7. Infrastructural Sources of Flooding .................................................... 21 PFRA Main Report (i) July 2011 4.5. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ................................... 22 4.6. USE OF HISTORIC HAZARD AND RISK OUTCOMES ......................... 22 5. CONSULTATIVE PROCESS .......................................................................... 23 5.1. CONSULTATION TO DATE ..................................................................... 23 5.2. PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS ..................................................... 23 6. OUTCOMES ...................................................................................................... 25 6.1. THE DESIGNATION OF AFAS ................................................................. 25 6.1.1. Guiding Principles for Designation of AFAs ....................................... 25 6.1.2. Probable and Possible AFAs ............................................................... 26 6.2. NATURAL SOURCES OF FLOODING .................................................... 26 6.2.1. Flood Risk to the Environment ............................................................ 26 6.2.2. Flood Risk to Agriculture..................................................................... 27 6.2.3. Flood Risk from Tsunamis ................................................................... 27 6.2.4. Areas Benefiting from Flood Relief Schemes ....................................... 28 6.3. INFRASTRUCTURAL SOURCES OF FLOODING ................................. 28 6.3.1. Urban Storm-Water Drainage Systems ............................................... 28 6.3.2. Reservoirs ............................................................................................ 28 6.3.3. Water Supply System ............................................................................ 29 6.3.4. ESB ....................................................................................................... 29 6.3.5. Waterways Ireland ............................................................................... 29 6.4. CROSS-BORDER COORDINATION ........................................................ 29 7. NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................... 31 PFRA Main Report (ii) July 2011 APPENDICES APPENDIX A ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF THE EU ‘FLOODS’ DIRECTIVE APPENDIX B TECHNICAL PFRA REPORTS APPENDIX C HISTORIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT Appendix C.1 Records of No. Past Flood Events per Location Appendix C.2 Records of Financial Damage for Past Floods Appendix C.3 Records of No. of Properties Flooded During Past Floods Appendix C.4 Records of Past Floods Related to Infrastructure APPENDIX D RECEPTOR VULNERABILITIES APPENDIX E PREDICTIVE FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES Appendix E.1 Predictive Analysis Outcomes for Fluvial and Coastal Flood Risk Appendix E.2 Predictive Analysis Outcomes for Groundwater Flood Risk Appendix E.3 Predictive Analysis Outcomes for Pluvial Flood Risk Appendix E.4 Predictive Analysis Outcomes for Environmentally Designated Sites Appendix E.5 Maps of Predictive Agricultural Flood Risk APPENDIX F PROBABLE AND POSSIBLE AREAS FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENT PFRA Main Report (iii) July 2011 (Blank Page) PFRA Main Report (iv) July 2011 GLOSSARY TERMS USED Area for Further Areas where, based on the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (AFA) Assessment, the risks associated with flooding are potentially significant, and where further, more detailed assessment if required to determine the degree of flood risk, and develop measures to manage and reduce the flood risk. Communities Cities, towns, villages or townlands where there are a collection of homes, businesses and other properties Consequences The impacts of flooding, which may be physical (e.g., damage to a property or monument) or a disruption (e.g., loss of electiricity supply or blockage of a road). Flood Extent The extent of land that has been, or might be, flooded. Flood extent is often represented on a flood map. Hazard Something that can cause harm or detrimental consequences. In this report, the hazard referred to is flooding. Indicative This term is typically used to refer to the flood maps developed under the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment. The maps are developed using simple methods, and generally national datasets, and are hence approximate, and not highly detailed, with some local anomalies. Point Receptor Something that might suffer hamr or damage as a result of flood, that is at
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nomination of the Monastic City of Clonmacnoise and Its Cultural Landscape for Inclusion in the WORLD HERITAGE LIST
    DRAFT Nomination of The Monastic City of Clonmacnoise and its Cultural Landscape For inclusion in the WORLD HERITAGE LIST Clonmacnoise World Heritage Site Draft Nomination Form Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................III 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY ......................................................................1 1.a Country:..................................................................................................1 1.b State, Province or Region:......................................................................1 1.c Name of Property: ..................................................................................1 1.d Geographical co-ordinates to the nearest second ..................................1 1.e Maps and plans, showing the boundaries of the nominated property and buffer zone ........................................................................................................2 1.f Area of nominated property (ha.) and proposed buffer zone (ha.)..........3 2. DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................4 2.a Description of Property ..........................................................................4 2.b History and development......................................................................31 3. JUSTIFICATION FOR INSCRIPTION ........................................................................38 3.a Criteria under which inscription
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Biodiversity and Landscape
    Offaly County Development Plan 2021-2027: Draft Stage Chapter 4 Biodiversity and Landscape Chapter 4: Biodiversity and Landscape 4.1 Introduction Biodiversity or biological diversity simply refers to all living things on earth; people, plants, animals, fungi and micro-organisms, the ecosystems and habitats which they form part of and their interdependence and interconnectedness with each other. The conservation of biodiversity is an integral part of good environmental management. Natural capital is the earths stock of natural assets which include geology, soil, air, water and all living things. It is from this natural capital that people derive a wide range of services often called ecosystem, services which make human life possible. In line with Regional Policy Objective (RPO) 3.4 of the Eastern and Midland Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy, the Council promotes an ecosystems services approach in the preparation of this County Development Plan. The four main types of ecosystem services are provisioning, regulating, habitat and cultural, each of which are defined in Table 4.1 below; Table 4.1 Definition of Each Type of Ecosystem Service Type of Ecosystem Services Definition Provisioning services Products obtained from ecosystems such as food, fresh water, wood, fibre, genetic resources and medicines. Regulating services Benefits obtained from the regulation of ecosystem processes such as climate regulation, natural hazard regulation, water purification, waste management, pollination and pest control. Habitat services Provision of habitats for migratory species and to maintain the viability of gene-pools. Cultural services Non-material benefits that people obtain from ecosystems such as spiritual enrichment, intellectual development, recreation and aesthetic values.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC BANAGHER, Co. OFFALY CONSERVATION
    HISTORIC BANAGHER, Co. OFFALY CONSERVATION, INTERPRETATION & MANAGEMENT PLAN April 2018 Fig. 1: ‘Banagher Stag’ by artist Roddy Moynihan. www.oisingallery.com © Howley Hayes Architects 2018 Howley Hayes Architects were commissioned by Banagher Development Group, Offaly County Council and the Heritage Council to prepare a Conservation, Management and Interpretation Plan for Banagher, Co. Offaly. The surveys on which this plan are based were undertaken in June 2017. The historic survey drawings were photographed by James Scully, Kieran Keenaghan and Eoghan Broderick at the National Archives in the UK and Waterways Ireland archive in Enniskillen and made available for this report. We would like to thank: Amanda Pedlow (Heritage Officer; Offaly County Council) for her valuable input in the preperation of this plan and feedback on the early drafts; Dermot Egan (Community and Local Development; Offaly County Council), together with all of the members of Offaly County Council and Banagher Development Group who attended meetings and supported the initiative. CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 14 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 29 4.0 ASSESSMENT & STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 55 5.0 DEFINING ISSUES & ASSESSING VULNERABILITY 59 6.0 CONSERVATION POLICIES 63 7.0 INTERPRETATION & MANAGEMENT POLICIES 64 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS 67 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Place Located on the southern point of a sweeping bend its many churches and castles. Delvin Eathra had a on the Middle Shannon. Banagher’s Main Street rises rich heritage of Early Christian foundations including from the riverbank to the summit of a low-lying hill, Clonmacnoise, Gallen, Tisaran and Reynagh, and has offering views across the wider landscape comprising been referred to by historians as ‘a flowering garden of the mid-Shannon floodplains, which is designated of monasteries’.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP-304056-19
    Inspector’s Report ABP-304056-19 Development Install approximately 12.5km of 38kv electricity transmission line from the permitted (windfarm) substation in Stonestown, County Offaly to the electricity substation in Clondallow, County Offaly. Location Across the townlands of Stonestown, Kilcamin, Crancreagh, Derrinlough, Clooneen, Whigsborough, Galros East, Galros West, Cush, Boolinarig Big, Conspark, Ballaghanoher, Ross and Clondallow, Co Offaly Planning Authority Offaly County Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 18230 Applicant Gaeltech Energy Developments Cloghan Ltd. Type of Application Planning Permission Planning Authority Decision Refuse Type of Appeal First Party Appellant Gaeltech Energy Developments Ltd. Cloghan Ltd. ABP-304056-19 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 40 Date of Site Inspection 25th, September 2019 & 5th, December 2019 Inspector Paddy Keogh ABP-304056-19 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 40 1.0 Site Location and Description 1.1.1. The site of the proposed development consists of a route for a 38 KV transmission line passing through the town lands of Stonestown, Kilcamin, Crancreagh, Derrinlough, Clooneen, Whigsborough, Galros East, Galros West, Cush, Boolinarig Big, Conspark, Ballaghanoher, Ross and Clondallow. The proposed route will connect a permitted wind farm at Clondallow to the existing 110 KV Dallow substation at Clondallow in Co. Offaly. 1.1.2. The site (38 KV transmission route) is located within a flat lowland area characterised by bog and peatland topography. 1.1.3. A mid-section of the site (c. 3.3 km – as amended by further information submitted to the planning authority) includes an underground route beneath the N 62. 1.1.4. Elsewhere underground and overhead sections the transmission line traverse open countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakelands and Lots More
    EXPERIENCE THE LAKELANDSEXPERIENCE Lakelands & Inland Waterways Pocket Guide FREE COPY THINGS TO DO PLACES TO SEE FAMILY FUN EVENTS & MAPS AND LOTS MORE... EXPERIENCE THE LAKELANDSEXPERIENCE 1 2 GET IN TOUCH! S L O B M Y S Visit one of Fáilte Ireland’s official tourist offices, where ment Ireland / Govern Survey © Ordnance 8670 No. Permit Ireland Survey Ordnance 3 you will receive free and unbiased advice, information, maps and literature. You can also book accommodation, attractions, events, festivals, tickets and tours. ZONE 1 - Mullingar Discover Ireland Fermanagh Visitor Information Centre Centre Market Square, Mullingar, Wellington Road, Enniskillen, Co Westmeath 4 Co. Fermanagh, BT74 7EF T 044-9348650 T 028 6632 3110 E [email protected] E [email protected] #lovewestmeath @fermanaghlakes ZONE 4 ZONE 2 Limerick Tourist Office Cavan Tourist Office 20 O’Connell Street, Limerick City Johnston Central Library, T 061-317522 5 Farnham St E [email protected] Cavan Town #lovelimerick T 049-4331942 E [email protected] Nenagh Tourist Office Banba Square, Nenagh, Co. Tipperary. ZONE 3 T 067-31610 Athlone Tourist Office E [email protected] Athlone Castle, Athlone Town, #lovetipperary 6 Co. Westmeath T 090 6494630 For a complete list of all E [email protected] Community Tourist Offices #lovewestmeath and Visitor Information Points affiliated with Fáilte Ireland, please visit our website below. 7 Connect with us: 2 CONTENTS Contents Get in Touch Inside Cover Experience the Lakelands 2 Zone 1: Lough Erne
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Water Levels on the River Shannon
    Understanding water levels on the River Shannon Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Study Introduction In line with government policy, the Office of Public Works (OPW ) is in the proces s o f un der ta king t he Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment a nd Ma nagemen t (CF RAM ) S tudy to g ive us a clear and comprehensive picture of flood risk in the Shannon a rea and set out how the risk can be managed effectively and sustainably. Based on technical work and information from stakeh olde rs and lo cal comm unitie s, we will gener ate detailed flood maps (due by the end of 2013) showing wh er e curr en t and f utu re floo ding is likely to occur. By 2015, we will produce Flood Risk Management P lans ( FRM Ps ) wh ich will set out specif ic programmes of measures and how the OPW, local aut horities and oth er sta keholders, inc luding the ESB and Waterways Ireland, should work together to address flood risks in the catchment. In the meantime, a lot of work needs to be done to help us fully understand the risks of flooding and ensure that the flood maps and subsequent plans are properly informed, accurate and reliable. An important part of this early work is to research and understand the current operations of structures (e.g. weirs and sluices) along the River Shannon, who has responsibilities for water levels and how this impacts flood risk management. Map of Ireland showing location of Shannon Map of Shannon CFRAM Study area showing location CFRAM Study area of the Callow s are a between Athlone and Meelick W eir 2 Shannon Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Study What is the River Shannon Level Operation Review report? The River Shannon Level Operation Review report is the output from a desk-based technical assessment that was carried out during 2011 which aimed to: l Analyse existing data and available information on water levels and flows, and operating regulations for the control structures and dams at key locations along the River Shannon.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Corridor Study River Shannon
    Waterways Corridor Study 2004 A study of the area surrounding Lanesborough to Shannonbridge Colin Buchanan and Partners in association with John Cronin & Associates, Fred Hamond, Dr Amanda Browne Waterways Corridor Study 2004 A study of the area surrounding Lanesborough to Shannonbridge Produced by Colin Buchanan and Partners in association with John Cronin & Associates, Fred Hamond, Dr Amanda Browne Final Report: WATERWAYS STUDY lanesborough to shannonbridge ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the following for their contribution to this study: The Steering Group for their commission and direction, ongoing advice and input, and their commitment and enthusiasm to this project: Colin Becker, Ruth Delany, Dr John Keane and Beatrice Kelly, The Heritage Council; Ray Dunne, Niall Moore, Joe O’Sullivan and Michael McKiernan, Waterways Ireland; Marie Mannion, Galway County Council Tony McDonnell, Longford County Council Lisa Henry and Amanda Pedlow, Offaly County Council Frank Flanagan, Eve Harrison and Nollaig McKeon, Roscommon County Council Mark Brindley, Bernie Guest and Muiris Quinn, Westmeath County Council The Project Team for their professionalism and dedication for the subject throughout this project: Paul McTernan, Associate Director, Colin Buchanan and Partners Lisa Grainger, Principal Planner, Colin Buchanan and Partners Mary Hughes, Principal Planner, Colin Buchanan and Partners Guy Bartley, Principal Landscape Architect, Colin Buchanan and Partners Christina Kelly, Graduate Planner, Colin Buchanan and Partners Aoife
    [Show full text]
  • 1 INTRODUCTION in December 2004, Environmental Resources
    1 INTRODUCTION In December 2004, Environmental Resources Management Ireland Limited (“ERM”) in association with ERA-Maptec Ltd was commissioned by North Tipperary County Council to prepare a Landscape Character Assessment of North Tipperary. The objective of the study was to complete a thorough assessment of the character, value and sensitivity of North Tipperary’s landscape in order to provide the basis for policy formulation and informed decision-making regarding landscape management in the County. North Tipperary (shown in Figure 1) contains a variety of landscapes. The extensive upland areas of the County rise dramatically above the fertile limestone plains. These upland zones support a variety of habitats and land uses ranging from blanket bog to coniferous forestry. The geological faults around the Silvermines led to the deposition of metallic deposits that were to be exploited by humans 400 million year later. The low lying pastoral plains provide important communication corridors between the upland zones and the less accessible raised bogs areas in the north and eastern extremities of the county. To the west, Lough Derg and the River Shannon provide further landscape variety within the County and are important recreational, tourism and ecological resources for North Tipperary. As a landlocked county, North Tipperary is bounded by a number of counties with landscape features providing many natural boundaries. For example, the River Shannon and Lough Derg, define the boundary between the counties of Clare, Galway and Offaly. Extensive raised bog defines the eastern boundary with Counties Laois and Kilkenny. The valley between the Silvermines and Slieve Felim mountains offers a further natural boundary with Counties Limerick and South Tipperary.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Gardens the River Shannon Traditional Boats
    Herita ge Out lo ok ISSN - 1393 - 9777 WINTER 200 8/SPRING 2009 THE MAGAZINE OF THE HERITAGE COUNCIL HISTORIC GARDENS Discovering our rare historic growing heritage THE RIVER SHANNON Take a tour down Ireland’ s most important river TRADITIONAL BOATS OF IRELAND Recording tradition before it sinks WATERFORD BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN • HERITAGE EVENTS • RAHAN CONSERVATION PLAN The Heritage Council works to protect and enhance the richness, quality and diversity of our national heritage for everyone. www.heritagecouncil.ie CONTENTS Herita ge Out lo ok Heritage News 3 COMMENT FEATURES Rahan Monastic Site – Amanda Pedlow 12 HERITAGE AND THE ECONOMY Historic Gardens of Ireland – Finola Reid 22 The world is changing more quickly than at any time in human history. Whether in the oceans, on land, or in the world’s climate, the impact of human actions on our Recession and Environment – Frank Convery 27 earth is strikingly obvious. Previous editions of Heritage Outlook have reflected on The River Shannon – Aiveen Cooper 28 the fact that heritage here in Ireland is not a luxury but essential to our quality of life and economy. Our ecosystems or nature’s services deliver vital goods and serv - The Shannon Waterway Corridor Studies – ices that we take for granted as we place no price on their contribution and the Beatrice Kelly 34 goods they deliver are not traded on the stock exchange or market place. Yet, these The Value of Culture – Damian O’Brien 36 goods underpin our agriculture, forestry and tourism industries and are crucial to human health and wellbeing today and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Heritage of Roscommon REPORT FINAL, Low
    0 The Geological Heritage of Roscommon An audit of County Geological Sites in Roscommon by Matthew Parkes, Robert Meehan and Sophie Préteseille October 2012 The Roscommon Geological Heritage Project was supported by This report is an action of the County Roscommon Heritage Plan 2012 – 2016 1 For the: Irish Geological Heritage Programme Geological Survey of Ireland Beggars Bush Haddington Road Dublin 4 01-6782837 / 01-6782741 2 Contents Section 1 – Main Report Report Summary …………………………………………………………….…………….…… 6 Roscommon in the context of Irish Geological Heritage …………………………….… 7 Geological conservation issues and site management ………………………………. 9 Proposals and ideas for promotion of geological heritage in Roscommon. ……………… 12 A summary of the geology of Roscommon ……………………………………………... 16 Geological heritage versus geological hazards ………………………............................... 22 Glossary of geological terms ……………………………………………………………... 24 Data sources on the geology of County Roscommon ……………………………………... 29 Shortlist of Key Geological References ……………………………………………………... 31 Further sources of information and contacts ……………………………………………... 32 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………... 32 Site reports – general points ……………………………………………………………... 33 Site reports – location map ……………………………………………………………... 34 Section 2 – Site Reports IGH 1 Karst Site Name Brierfield Turlough Castleplunkett Turlough Carrowmurragh Mushroom Rocks Killeglan Karst Landscape Lough Funshinagh Loughnaneane Turlough Mewlaghmore Dolines Moyvannon Mushroom Rocks Mullygollan Turlough
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    SECTION F – EXISTING ENVIRONMENT & IMAPCT OF THE DISCHARGE(S) Attachment F1: Assessment of Impact on Receiving Surface or Ground Water − Attachment F.1: Natura Impact Statement − Table F.1(i)(a): Upstream Ambient Monitoring Data – Regular Emissions − Table F.1(i)(b): Downstream Ambient Monitoring Data – Regular Emissions − Table F.1(ii)(a): Upstream Ambient Monitoring Data – Dangerous Emissions − Table F.1(ii)(b): Downstream Ambient Monitoring Data – Dangerous Emissions Irish Water Report Natura Impact Statement as part of the Eyrecourt Waste Water COA application Contents Introduction 3 Legislative Context 3 Methodology 5 Guidance Followed 5 Stages Involved in the Appropriate Assessment Process 6 Field Walkover Surveys 6 Consultation 6 Stage 1: Screening 7 Stage 2: Appropriate Assessment 8 Description of the Project 8 Description of the Receiving Environment and Monitoring Results 9 Waste Assimilative Capacity 10 Field Walkover Survey 11 Description of the Natura 2000 Sites Affected 12 River Shannon Callows SAC 12 Description of the Conservation Interests of the SAC 14 Annex I Habitats 14 Annex II Species 15 Conservation Objectives of the River Shannon Callows SAC 16 Middle Shannon Callows SPA 16 Description of the Conservation Interests of the SPA 17 Table 7.0 Qualifying SPA Features along surveyed stretch 20 Conservation Objectives of the Middle Shannon Callows SPA 20 Impact Prediction 20 Impacts on Water Quality 20 Impacts on Annex I Habitats 22 Impacts on Annex II Species 22 Impacts on designated features of the SPA 23 Mitigation Measures 24 Stage 2 Appropriate Assessment Conclusion Statement 25 References 26 2 | Irish Water Natura Impact Statement - Eyrecourt Introduction This Natura Impact Statement provides an Appropriate Assessment (AA) of the existing Waste Water Treatment Plant (WwTP), located at Eyrecourt, County Galway, for the purposes of the Waste Water Discharge (Authorisation) Regulations, 2007 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Lough Derg) - Appropriate Assessment Screening Statement
    Water Supply Project – Dublin Region Water and Hydrographic Sampling Programs (Lough Derg) - Appropriate Assessment Screening Statement January 2015 Revision 1 Document Control Sheet BPP 04 F8 Version 15; March 2013 Project: Water Supply Project – Dublin Region Client: Irish Water Project No: 32105800 Document title: Water and Hydrographic Sampling Programs (Lough Derg) - Appropriate Assessment Screening Statement Ref. No: 32105800 -DA 1/R.06A/0009 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by REVISION NAME NAME NAME A RF PMG PC As Project Manager I confirm that the Michael Garrick INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to MFG Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and Peter Smyth NITIALS that I approve them for issue PS DATE 9 Sep 2014 Document status: For Client Review REVISION NAME NAME NAME 0 RF PMG PC As Project Manager I confirm that the Michael Garrick INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to MFG Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and Peter Smyth NITIALS that I approve them for issue PS DATE 8 Oct 2014 Document status: For Client Approval REVISION NAME NAME NAME 1 RF PMG PC As Project Manager I confirm that the Michael Garrick INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to MFG Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and Peter Smyth NITIALS that I approve them for issue PS DATE 26 Jan 2015 Document status: For Client Approval REVISION NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and NITIALS that I approve them for issue DATE Document status: Copyright Jacobs Engineering Ireland Limited.
    [Show full text]