DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Communal Land Registration in Lao

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Communal Land Registration in Lao Study on Communal Land Registration in Lao PDR Land Policy Study No. 6 under LLTP II Katrin Seidel Khamla Phanvilay Bounlath Vorachit Lau Mua Somthong Boupphachan Robert B. Oberndorf Sponsored by: Lao-German Land Policy Development Project (German Contribution to the Land Titling Project II in Lao PDR) February 2007 This study is part of a series of Land Policy Studies conducted in preparation of a coherent and comprehensive “National Land Policy Statement for Lao PDR”. The following studies have already been published in this series: No. 1: Study on Land Allocation to Individual Households in Rural Areas of Lao PDR; December 2004 Authors: Bouakham Soulivanh, Anothai Chantalasy, Phounsavat Suphida, Florian Lintzmeyer, Florian Rock No. 2: Study on Land Markets in Urban and Rural Areas of Lao PDR; March 2005 Authors: Bouakham Soulivanh, Anothai Chantalasy, Phounsavat Suphida, Florian Lintzmeyer, Florian Rock No. 3: Study on Land Tax and Fees Policy in Lao PDR; February 2006 Authors: Simon Keith, Pheuiphanh Ngaosrivathana, Bouakham Soulivanh, Onsy Phimsomphou, Chanh Denuthai No. 4: Study on State Land Leases and Concessions in Lao PDR; June 2006 Authors: Gunda Schumann, Pheuiphanh Ngaosrivathana, Bouakham Soulivanh, Somboun Kenpraseuth, Khamdeng Onmanivong, Khamthanh Vongphansipraseuth, Chithasone Bounkhong No. 5: Study on Urban Land markets in Lao PDR; September 2006 Authors: Babette Wehrmann, Bouakham Soulivanh, Khamdeng Onmanivong _______________________________________________________________ ii Acknowledgement The study team would like to thank all the organizations and individuals that have contributed to the success of this study. The results of our work have greatly benefited from our discussions with government officials of the Department of Land, the National Land Management Agency, the Ministry of Justice and the Ethnic Department of the Lao Front for National Construction. Particular thanks go to GTZ staff in Luang Namtha province and Dak Lak province (Vietnam) for technical and logistical support. We are also particularly grateful to Holger Grages and Gerry Duckitt of the German Agro Action Integrated Poverty Reduction Project for sharing their time, knowledge, experience, and homes during our stay in Phongsaly province. Last but not least, we would like to thank the people in all study villages that have received us and our questions with enormous patience and generous hospitality. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..................................................................................................................................III TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF TABLES, MAPS AND FIGURES.......................................................................................................V LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... VII I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 STUDY TEAM................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY VILLAGES ..................................................................................................... 5 1.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.7 DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 7 II. RESULTS FROM THE FIELD WORK........................................................................................................ 9 2.1 COMMUNAL TENURE SYSTEMS ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OF COMMUNAL LANDS........................................................................................ 13 2.3 CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMUNITIES AND USER GROUPS........................................................................... 17 2.4 CONFLICTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION .................................................................................................... 18 2.5 ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNAL LANDS......................................................................................... 19 2.6 TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNAL LAND MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 21 2.7 PERCEPTION ON COMMUNAL LAND REGISTRATION .................................................................................... 23 III. TOWARDS COMMUNAL LAND REGISTRATION IN THE LAO PDR............................................ 25 3.1 OBJECTIVES FOR COMMUNAL LAND REGISTRATION ................................................................................... 25 3.2 RISKS INVOLVED IN THE REGISTRATION OF COMMUNAL LANDS................................................................. 26 3.3 OPTIONS FOR COMMUNAL LAND REGISTRATION ........................................................................................ 27 IV. EXPERIENCES FROM CAMBODIA AND VIETNAM ......................................................................... 30 4.1 HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.3 STATE OF IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................................... 33 4.4 LESSONS LEARNED...................................................................................................................................... 35 V. LEGAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF COMMUNAL LAND REGISTRATION ...................... 37 5.1 EXPLANATION OF REGISTRATION AND TITLING .......................................................................................... 37 5.2 RECOGNIZING COMMUNITIES AND USER GROUPS FOR COMMUNAL TITLING.............................................. 38 5.3 TYPES OF LAND FOR REGISTRATION AND TITLING...................................................................................... 39 5.4 TYPES OF RIGHTS GRANTED THROUGH REGISTRATION AND TITLING.......................................................... 40 5. 5 LAND AND FOREST LAND CATEGORIES/CLASSIFICATIONS......................................................................... 41 5.6 AMOUNT OF LAND TO BE REGISTERED AND TITLED.................................................................................... 42 5.7 RECOGNITION OF CUSTOMARY USE ............................................................................................................ 42 5.8 LAND DISPUTE CONFLICT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ................................................................................ 43 5.9 CAN COMMUNAL LAND TITLE BE RECOGNIZED IN THE CURRENT FRAMEWORK?........................................ 44 5.10 OPTIONS FOR SUPPORTING COMMUNAL LAND TITLE................................................................................ 45 VI. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS .............................................................. 48 6.1 NATURE AND CONTENT OF COMMUNAL TITLE ........................................................................................... 48 6.2 LEGAL AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT WITH REGARDS TO COMMUNAL LAND TITLING .................................. 50 6.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNAL LAND TITLING ...................................................................................... 51 6.4 CLOSING THE KNOWLEDGE GAP: FURTHER RESEARCH AND STUDIES......................................................... 52 LITERATURE REFERENCE........................................................................................................................... 53 APPENDIX I: TERMS OF REFERENCE....................................................................................................... 56 iv APPENDIX II: LIST OF INTERVIEWS IN VIENTIANE ............................................................................ 60 APPENDIX III: TIME SCHEDULE................................................................................................................. 61 APPENDIX IV: VILLAGE CHECKLIST ....................................................................................................... 62 APPENDIX V: VILLAGE PROFILES............................................................................................................. 69 BAN NONGBUA, SING DISTRICT,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous and Tribal People's Rights Over Their Ancestral Lands
    INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09 30 December 2009 Original: Spanish INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter‐American Human Rights System 2010 Internet: http://www.cidh.org E‐mail: [email protected] OAS Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ancestrales y recursos naturales: Normas y jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos = Indigenous and tribal people’s rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: Norms and jurisprudence of the Inter‐American human rights system / [Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights.] p. ; cm. (OEA documentos oficiales ; OEA/Ser.L)(OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978‐0‐8270‐5580‐3 1. Human rights‐‐America. 2. Indigenous peoples‐‐Civil rights‐‐America. 3. Indigenous peoples‐‐Land tenure‐‐America. 4. Indigenous peoples‐‐Legal status, laws, etc.‐‐America. 5. Natural resources‐‐Law and legislation‐‐America. I. Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. II Series. III. Series. OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.56/09 Document published thanks to the financial support of Denmark and Spain Positions herein expressed are those of the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights and do not reflect the views of Denmark or Spain Approved by the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights on December 30, 2009 INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS MEMBERS Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero Víctor E. Abramovich Felipe González Sir Clare Kamau Roberts Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Florentín Meléndez Paolo G. Carozza ****** Executive Secretary: Santiago A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRATIC UNITY PROSPERITY Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry POVERTY REDUCTION FUND PHASE III ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (January – December 2019) Suspended bridge, Luangphakham to Nongkham village, Long district, Luangnamtha province (January 2020) Nahaidiao Rd, P.O.Box 4625, Vientiane, Lao PRF Tel: (+856) 21 261479 -80 Fax: (+856) 21 261481, Website: www.prflaos.org January 2018 ABBREVIATIONS AWPB Annual Work Plan and Budget AFN Agriculture for Nutrition CD Community Development CDD Community Driven Development CF Community Facilitator CFA Community Force Account CLTS Community-Lead Total Sanitation DAFO District Agriculture and Forestry Office Deepen CDD Deepen Community Driven Development DPO District Planning Office DRM Disaster Risks Management DSEDP District Social Economic Development Plan EM Energy and Mine FRM Feedback and Resolution Mechanism FNG Farmer Nutrition Group GESI Gender Equity and Social Inclusion GOL Government of Lao GIS Geography information system GPAR Governance Public Administration Reform HH Household(s) HR Human Resource IE Internal Evaluation IEC Information, Education, Communication IGA Income Generating Activities IFAD International Fund for Agriculture Development IFR Interim Un-Audited Financial Report KBF Kum Ban Facilitator KDPs Kum Ban Development Plans KPIs Key Performance Indicators LAK Lao Kip (Lao Currency) LN Livelihood and Nutrition LWU Lao Women Union LYU Lao Youth Union M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MIS Management information system MNS Minutes
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Land and Agricultural Productivity ✩
    Communal Land and Agricultural Productivity ✩ Charles Gottlieb2,3,4, Jan Grobovˇsek1 September 26, 2016 Abstract Communal land tenure is a typical feature of many developing countries. Such tenure regimes implement a “use it or lose it” principle by imposing restrictions to land trans- ferability that are enforced via the threat of expropriation. This paper measures the distortionary impact of communal land in a dynamic general equilibrium model of oc- cupational selection, calibrated to Ethiopia. We find that lifting restrictions on land transferability lowers agricultural employment by 19% and increases GDP by 7%. It also results in a large reduction in the ratio between non-agricultural and agricultural productivity, by 40% in real and 44% in nominal terms. Limited land transferability rationalizes a substantial fraction of the large agricultural productivity gap in poor economies. The associated loss in aggregate productivity, though, is comparatively minor. Keywords: Agricultural productivity, Growth and development, Misallocation, Land, Africa, Ethiopia. JEL: O10, O13, O40, O55, Q15. ✩ First version: September 2014. This paper has benefited from helpful suggestions by Tasso Adamopoulos, Tekie Alemu, Douglas Gollin, Madina Guloba, Roland Hodler, Philipp Kircher, Winfried Koeniger, Francis Mwesigye and Alemayehu Taffesse, as well as seminar participants at the Atlanta Fed, Cambridge, Western Ontario, York, McMaster, McGill, the North American Econometric Society Meeting (Minneapolis), CEPR Macroeconomic and Growth Meeting, EDRI (Addis Ababa), EPRC (Kampala), DEGIT XXI Conference, and World Bank Land and Poverty Conference 2015. The finan- cial support from DFID/ESRC (ES/L012499/1) is gratefully acknowledged. Email addresses: [email protected] (Charles Gottlieb), [email protected] (Jan Grobovˇsek) 1University of Edinburgh, School of Economics 2University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Anticommons: Historical Land Privatization and Modern
    Creating Anticommons: Historical Land Privatization and Modern Natural Resource Use1 Bryan Leonard Arizona State University [email protected] Dominic Parker University of Wisconsin, Madison [email protected] May 31, 2017 Abstract: We explain how privatizing the commons to promote use of one land-based resource (agriculture) discourages use of another (shale oil). We test for this ‘anticommons’ problem using a natural experiment on the Bakken, one of the world's largest shale reserves. Before oil discovery, U.S. land policies inadvertently created a mosaic of private and tribal subsurface ownership on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. We compare horizontal drilling across parcels during the 2005-2015 fracking boom and find that fragmented ownership significantly reduced royalty income, relative to contiguous tribal ownership. This evidence highlights a cost of subdividing land containing spatially expansive natural resources. Key words: anticommons, oil, indigenous policy, transaction costs, resource booms, privatization JEL Codes: O13, Q32, Q33, D23, H82, K11 1 For helpful comments, we thank Alex Rothenberg, Jane Friesen, Dean Lueck, Donna Feir, Gary Libecap, Terry Anderson, Shawn Regan, Tim Fitzgerald, Dan Benjamin, Ronald Trosper, and seminar participants at Simon Fraser U., Stanford U. (Hoover Economic Policy Talk), U. of Illinois, U. of Hawaii, UC-Riverside, and the Property and Environment Research Center. We also thank attendees of conference sessions hosted by SOIE, UC Santa Barbara, WEAI, AERE, and the Midwest International Development Conference. We are grateful to Matt Kelly, an attorney of Tarlow and Stonecipher PLLC for helpful discussions about oil and gas leasing on the Bakken. I. Introduction Much of the world’s indigenous populations live on communally owned land and this ownership structure has likely hindered development.
    [Show full text]
  • Typhoon Haima in the Lao People's Democratic Republic
    TYPHOON HAIMA IN THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Joint Damage, Losses and Needs Assessment – August, 2011 A Report prepared by the Government of the Lao PDR with support from the ADB , ADPC, FAO , GFDRR, Save the Children, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN-HABITAT, WFP, WHO, World Bank, World Vision, and WSP Lao People's Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity TYPHOON HAIMA JOINT DAMAGE, LOSSES AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT (JDLNA) *** October 2011 A Report prepared by the Government of the Lao PDR With support from the ADB, ADPC, FAO, GFDRR , Save the Children, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN- HABITAT, WFP ,WHO, World Bank, World Vision, AND WSP Vientiane, August 29, 2011 Page i Foreword On June 24-25, 2011, Typhoon Haima hit the Northern and Central parts of the Lao PDR causing heavy rain, widespread flooding and serious erosion in the provinces of Xiengkhouang, Xayaboury, Vientiane and Bolikhamxay. The typhoon caused severe damage and losses to the basic infrastructure, especially to productive areas, the irrigation system, roads and bridges, hospitals, and schools. Further, the typhoon disrupted the local people’s livelihoods, assets and properties. The poor and vulnerable groups of people are most affected by the typhoon. Without immediate recovery efforts, its consequences will gravely compromise the development efforts undertaken so far by the government, seriously set back economic dynamism, and further jeopardise the already very precarious situation in some of the provinces that were hard hit by the typhoon. A Joint Damage, Losses and Needs Assessment (JDLNA) was undertaken, with field visit to the four most affected provinces from 25th July to 5th August 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph of Cercosporoid Fungi from Laos
    Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology Doi 10.5943/cream/3/1/2 Monograph of Cercosporoid fungi from Laos Phengsintham P1,2, Chukeatirote E 1, McKenzie EHC3, Hyde KD1 and Braun U4 1School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 2Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Laos 3Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 4Martin-Luther-Universität, Institut für Biologie, Bereich Geobotanik und Botanischer Garten, Herbarium, Neuwerk 21 06099 Halle/S. Germany Phengsintham P, Chukeatirote E, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Braun U 2013 – Monograph of Cercosporoid fungi from Laos. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 3(1), 34– 158, doi 10.5943/cream/3/1/2 The Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) or Laos is a landlocked country. During a study of cercosporoid fungi in Laos, 113 species were identified including 108 species of true cercosporoid fungi; Cercospora (41 species), Passalora (10), Pseudocercospora (49), and Zasmidium (8). Five species of morphological similar fungi we also found; Cladosporium (1 species), Periconiella (1), Pseudocercosporella (1), Scolecostigmina (1), and Spiropes (1). Sixteen new taxa were established namely, Cercospora duranticola, C. senecionis-walkeri, Passalora dipterocarpi, P. helicteris-viscidae, Pseudocercospora getoniae, P. mannanorensis var. paucifasciculata, P. micromeli, P. tectoniae, P. wenlandiphila, Zasmidium aporosae, Z. dalbergiae, Z. jasminicola, Z. meynae-laxiflorae, Z. micromeli, Z. suregadae, Z. pavettae. Eighty-seven species are described in full and illustrated, and another 26 species are only listed since they have been previously recorded from Laos. Key words – Asia – Cercospora – Cercosporoid fungus – monograph Article Information Received 29 January 2013 Accepted 20 March 2013 Published online 25 June 2013 *Corresponding author: Kevin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in the Flora of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam
    Turczaninowia 20 (3): 103–147 (2017) ISSN 1560–7259 (print edition) DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.20.3.10 TURCZANINOWIA http://turczaninowia.asu.ru ISSN 1560–7267 (online edition) УДК 582.394:581.4 Preliminary checklist of Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in the flora of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam L. V. Averyanov1, Van The Pham2, T. V. Maisak1, Tuan Anh Le3, Van Canh Nguyen4, Hoang Tuan Nguyen5, Phi Tam Nguyen6, Khang Sinh Nguyen2, Vu Khoi Nguyen7, Tien Hiep Nguyen8, M. Rodda9 1 Komarov Botanical Institute, Prof. Popov, 2; St. Petersburg, RF-197376, Russia E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 3Quang Tri Center of Science and Technology, Mientrung Institute for Scientific Research, 121 Ly Thuong Kiet, Dong Ha, Quang Tri, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 4 3/12/3 Vo Van Kiet Street, Buon Ma Thuot City, Dak Lak province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Pharmacognosy, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, 15 Le Thanh Tong, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam E-mail: [email protected] 6Viet Nam Post and Telecommunications Group – VNPT, Lam Dong 8 Tran Phu Street, Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 7Wildlife At Risk, 202/10 Nguyen Xi st., ward 26, Binh Thanh, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 8Center for Plant Conservation, no. 25/32, lane 191, Lac Long Quan, Nghia Do, Cau Giay District, Ha Noi, Vietnam E-mail: [email protected] 9Herbarium, Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Bioprospecting, Access and Benefit-Sharing Legislation
    Science Policy South African Journal of Science 104, September/October 2008 355 Historically, a lack of bioprospecting South Africa’s bioprospecting, legislation and associated regulations has permitted almost unconstrained access to access and benefit-sharing South African bioresources, with materials being harvested, sometimes in destruc- legislation: current realities, future tively excessive quantities, and being exported to research and development complications, and a proposed nodes abroad, for innovative value addi- tion, and off-shore financial benefit. The alternative consequence has been that the country as a whole, including traditional knowledge (TK)-holding communities and bio- a,c Neil R. Croucha,b*, Errol Douwes , resource providers, have not benefited Maureen M. Wolfsond, Gideon F. Smithd,e and equitably from the commercial and other gains derived from local bioresource c Trevor J. Edwards commercialization. Records, fifteen years ago, reveal that the Dutch flower industry lobally, many nations are legislating the world, being the smallest but most earned almost R300 million annually access for bioprospecting purposes to diverse floristic kingdom known. With from the sale of freesias alone.7 The genus Gtheir biological and genetic resources. over 19 500 indigenous plant species in Freesia is near-endemic to South Africa. South Africa, as a megadiverse country, has about 350 plant families, South Africa Similarly, large areas are under cultivation, recently regulated bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing activities in accordance indeed has the richest temperate flora in with Gladiolus, Zantedeschia and Nerine 8 with its obligations as a ratifying party to the world. In addition, three global plants in Holland and New Zealand. the Convention on Biological Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Cousins-Propert ... an Reform in the 1990S.Pdf
    CENTRE FOR APPLIES SOCIAL SCIENCES (CASS Occasional Paper - NRM Series ; 1993) IN ZIMBABWE'S COMMUNAL LANDS: Implications for Agrarian Reform in the l990'S By Bern Cousins Reprinted July 1993 Paper presented at a conference on Land Policy In Zimbabwe After "Lancaster" University of Zimbabwe, February 13-15 1990. ABSTRACT An understanding of the social relations of production and exchange in the communal farming sector is critical to assessments of options for agrarian reform. Recent survey research has indicated that this sector is deeply differentiated, but few in-depth analyses exist of the political economy of rural production or of processes of differentiation. Differentiation is here viewed from the perspective of a reproduction/ accumulation problematic, and access to land is identified as a critical constraint on a small layer of would-be rural accumulators. Access is constrained by the current version of "communal tenure", understood as a structure of property relations overdetermined by local and non- local political processes. The "new institutionalist economics" view of property regimes as bundles of rights and duties, together with the results of recent historical research on land tenure in Zimbabwe, helps us understand "communal tenure" as historically variable rules of access and control subject to power plays by interested groups of actors. Marxist and neo-Marxist theories of property in non-capitalist and capitalist societies help us to situate these power plays in the context of the political economy of capitalist development in Zimbabwe. This perspective is illustrated using case study material from Mondoro Communal Land. Agrarian reform policy needs to recognize the two- edged nature of "communal tenure".
    [Show full text]
  • Lao Pdr. Raising Community Awareness On
    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26026-0 · www.unido.org · [email protected] -'FINAL REPORT ( g C Raising ComN4nltit Awalensbll oil HazaIds, of Melc4Fg Expos4P Introduction of'Small4cale Gold Mining Ejiiijiinent and Aeeeeement of Small4cale Gold Mining Acthrities in Lao PGR for UNfDO GLOBAL MERCURY PROJECT (EG/GLO/01/G34) and the OEPARTNEHT'OF GEOLOGY AND, NINES, GOVERNINEHT OF LAO PDR APRlL 2007 .
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Progress and Impoverishment: Plantations, Hydropower, Ecological Change and Community Transformation in Hinboun District, Lao PDR a Field Report
    YCAR Papers No. I June 2007 Political Ecology series (Re)making Governance series Power, Progress and Impoverishment: Plantations, Hydropower, Ecological Change and Community Transformation in Hinboun District, Lao PDR A Field Report By Keith Barney Acknowledgements The fieldwork for this research was made possible through the institutional support and encouragement of the Faculty of Forestry, National University of Laos and the International Development Research Centre-CBNRM Capacity Building Program. The author would like to thank the NUoL - IDRC team, including: Vice-Dean Houngpeth Chanthavong, Vice-Dean Khamla Phanvilay, Sitthong Thongmanivong, Yayoi Fujita, Thoumthone Vongvisouk, Phansamai Phommisai, Emily Hunter, and Amalin Phanvilay for their kind assistance, advice, and camaraderie. Acknowledgements for ongoing support are extended to an excellent doctoral committee at York University in Toronto, comprised of: Philip Kelly, Peter Vandergeest, Shubhra Gururani and Linda Peake. In Laos, I extend personal thanks to: Glenn Hunt, Japan Volunteer Centre Vientiane; Michael Dwyer, University of California at Berkeley; Richard Hackman, Canada Fund Laos/Global Association for People and Environment, Pakse; and Aviva Imhof, International Rivers Network, Berkeley. In Toronto, Robin Roth from the York Centre for Asian Research provided timely editorial comments. Phornmanee Xayasouk and Phansamai Phommisai were invaluable and enthusiastic field research assistants in Hinboun district. Bobby Allen and Bounmaa Molaknasouk from the Theun-Hinboun Power Company, and Mark Linton from Oji-Lao Plantation Forestry Limited took time to meet with the author on several occasions. The author would also like to thank the Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office (PAFO) of Khammouane province, Laos, for facilitating this fieldwork. Major funding for this research was provided through doctoral dissertation awards from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in Ottawa, and Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Title: Country: Accredited Entity: Date of First Submission
    Implementation of the Lao PDR Emission Reductions Programme Project Title: through improved governance and sustainable forest landscape management (Project 1) Country: Lao People’s Democratic Republic Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Accredited Entity: GmbH Date of first submission: 2019/03/02 Date of current submission: 2019/10/11 Version number: V.011 GREEN CLIMATE FUND FUNDING PROPOSAL V.2.0 | PAGE 0 OF 95 Contents Section A PROJECT / PROGRAMME SUMMARY Section B PROJECT INFORMATION Section C FINANCING INFORMATION Section D EXPECTED PERFORMANCE AGAINST INVESTMENT CRITERIA Section E LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Section F RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT Section G GCF POLICIES AND STANDARDS Section H ANNEXES Note to Accredited Entities on the use of the funding proposal template • Accredited Entities should provide summary information in the proposal with cross- reference to annexes such as feasibility studies, gender action plan, term sheet, etc. • Accredited Entities should ensure that annexes provided are consistent with the details provided in the funding proposal. Updates to the funding proposal and/or annexes must be reflected in all relevant documents. • The total number of pages for the funding proposal (excluding annexes) should not exceed 60. Proposals exceeding the prescribed length will not be assessed within the usual service standard time. • The recommended font is Arial, size 11. • Under the GCF Information Disclosure Policy, project and programme funding proposals will be disclosed on the GCF website, simultaneous with the submission to the Board, subject to the redaction of any information that may not be disclosed pursuant to the IDP. Accredited Entities are asked to fill out information on disclosure in section G.4.
    [Show full text]