DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Conference Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Conference Program The World’s Forum for Aerospace Leadership 21st AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting 13–17 February 2011, New Orleans, Louisiana AAS General Chair Angela Bowes AMA Inc./NASA LaRC AIAA General Chair Dr. Peter C. Lai The Aerospace Corporation AAS Technical Chair Dr. Moriba Jah AFRL/RVSV AIAA Technical Chair Dr. Yanping Guo Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Cover image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Wisconsin This is one segment of an infrared portrait of dust and stars radiating in the inner Milky Way. More than 800,000 frames from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope were stitched together to create the full image, capturing more than 50 percent of our entire galaxy. This is a three-color composite that shows infrared observations from two Spitzer instruments. Blue represents 3.6-micron light and green shows light of 8 microns, both captured by Spitzer’s infrared array camera. Red is 24-micron light detected by Spitzer’s multiband imaging photometer. This combines observations from the Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE) and MIPSGAL projects. Images, maps, and information in the conference program are used with the consent of all parties to AAS/AIAA. Cover design and conference program printing sponsored by The Aerospace Corporation. Table of Contents General Information ........................................................................................................................ 3 Registration ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Schedule of Events .......................................................................................................................... 4 Loews New Orleans Hotel Layout .................................................................................................. 7 Special Events ................................................................................................................................. 9 Early Bird Reception ................................................................................................................... 9 Student and Young Professional Reception ................................................................................ 9 Offsite Event – Musée Conti Wax Museum ............................................................................... 9 Dirk Brouwer Award Plenary and Breakwell Travel Award Presentation: .............................. 10 Dirk Brouwer Award Honoree .................................................................................................. 11 Conference Location ..................................................................................................................... 12 Loews New Orleans Hotel Accommodations ........................................................................... 12 Transportation Info ................................................................................................................... 12 Directions .................................................................................................................................. 13 Arrival Information ................................................................................................................... 14 Restaurants ................................................................................................................................ 15 Recreation ................................................................................................................................. 17 Area Map .................................................................................................................................. 19 Additional Information ................................................................................................................. 20 Speaker Orientation .................................................................................................................. 20 Volunteers ................................................................................................................................. 20 Presentations ............................................................................................................................. 20 Preprinted Manuscripts ............................................................................................................. 20 Conference Proceedings............................................................................................................ 20 Satisfaction Survey ................................................................................................................... 21 Committee Meetings ................................................................................................................. 21 Subcommittee Meetings............................................................................................................ 21 Session 1: Asteroid Missions I .................................................................................................... 22 Session 2: Attitude Dynamics and Control I ............................................................................... 24 Session 3: Orbit Determination ................................................................................................... 26 Session 4: Trajectory Design and Optimization I ........................................................................ 28 Session 5: Attitude Determination ............................................................................................... 30 Session 6: Rendezvous and Proximity Missions ......................................................................... 32 Session 7: Space Surveillance ..................................................................................................... 34 Page 1 21st AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting Session 8: Trajectory Design and Optimization II ...................................................................... 36 Session 9: Spacecraft Guidance, Navigation, and Control .......................................................... 38 Session 10: Orbital Debris and Space Environment.................................................................... 40 Session 11: Asteroid Missions II ................................................................................................. 42 Session 12: Decadal Survey and Interplanetary Mission Design ................................................ 44 Session 13: Special Session: Innovative GNC Test Solutions .................................................... 46 Session 14: Orbit Determination and Navigation ........................................................................ 48 Session 15: Satellite Relative Motion.......................................................................................... 50 Session 16: Special Session: Optical Navigation ........................................................................ 52 Session 17: Satellite Constellations ............................................................................................. 54 Session 18: Low-Thrust Trajectory Design ................................................................................. 56 Session 19: Earth Orbit and Missions ......................................................................................... 58 Session 20: Dynamical Systems and Orbital Mechanics ............................................................ 60 Session 21: Space Debris Removal ............................................................................................. 62 Session 22: Attitude Sensor ......................................................................................................... 63 Session 23: Trajectory and Mission Analysis ............................................................................. 65 Session 24: Attitude Dynamics and Control II ............................................................................ 67 Session 25: Lunar Trajectory Design .......................................................................................... 69 Author Index ................................................................................................................................. 71 Conference Planner ....................................................................................................................... 73 Record of Meeting Expenses ........................................................................................................ 75 Conference Satisfaction Survey .................................................................................................... 76 21st AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting Page 2 21ST AAS/AIAA SPACE FLIGHT MECHANICS MEETING CONFERENCE INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION Welcome to the 21st Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, hosted by the American Astronautical Society (AAS) and co-hosted by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), February 13 – 17, 2011. This meeting is organized by the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Committee and the AIAA Astrodynamics Technical Committee, and held at the Loews New Orleans Hotel, 300 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130. Phone: 504-595-3300. REGISTRATION Registration Site (https://aas.pxi.com/registration/reg) In order to encourage early registration, we have implemented the following conference registration rate structure: Register by 14 Jan 2011 and save $50! Category Early Registration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maneuver Detection of Space Object for Space Surveillance
    MANEUVER DETECTION OF SPACE OBJECT FOR SPACE SURVEILLANCE Jian Huang*, Weidong Hu, Lefeng Zhang $756WDWH.H\/DE1DWLRQDO8QLYHUVLW\RI'HIHQVH7HFKQRORJ\&KDQJVKD+XQDQ3URYLQFH&KLQD (PDLOKXDQJMLDQ#QXGWHGXFQ ABSTRACT on the technique of a moving window curve fit. Holzinger & Scheeres presented an object correlation Maneuver detection is a very important task for and maneuver detection method using optimal control maintaining the catalog of the orbital objects and space performance metrics [5]. Kelecy & Jah focused on the situational awareness. This paper mainly focuses on the detection and reconstruction of single low thrust in- typical maneuver scenario where space objects only track maneuvers by using the orbit determination perform tangential orbital maneuvers during a relative strategies based on the batch least-squares and long gap. Particularly, only two classical and extended Kalman filter (EKF) [6]. However, these commonly applied orbital transition manners are methods are highly relevant to the presupposed considered, i.e. the twice tangential maneuvers at the maneuvering mode and a relative short observation gap. apogee and the perigee or one tangential maneuver at In this paper, to address the real observed data, we only an arbitrary time. Based on this, we preliminarily consider the common maneuvering modes and estimate the maneuvering mode and parameters by observation scenarios in practical. For an orbital analyzing the change of semi-major axis and maneuver, minimization of fuel consumption is eccentricity. Furthermore, if only one tangential essential because the weight of a payload that can be maneuver happened, we can formulate the estimation carried to the desired orbit depends on this problem of maneuvering parameters as a non-linear minimization.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book
    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Saturn Orbit Insertion Impulse Using Deep-Space Low Thrust
    Reduction of Saturn Orbit Insertion Impulse using Deep-Space Low Thrust Elena Fantino ∗† Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Roberto Flores‡ International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 08034 Barcelona, Spain. Jesús Peláez§ and Virginia Raposo-Pulido¶ Technical University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Orbit insertion at Saturn requires a large impulsive manoeuver due to the velocity difference between the spacecraft and the planet. This paper presents a strategy to reduce dramatically the hyperbolic excess speed at Saturn by means of deep-space electric propulsion. The inter- planetary trajectory includes a gravity assist at Jupiter, combined with low-thrust maneuvers. The thrust arc from Earth to Jupiter lowers the launch energy requirement, while an ad hoc steering law applied after the Jupiter flyby reduces the hyperbolic excess speed upon arrival at Saturn. This lowers the orbit insertion impulse to the point where capture is possible even with a gravity assist with Titan. The control-law algorithm, the benefits to the mass budget and the main technological aspects are presented and discussed. The simple steering law is compared with a trajectory optimizer to evaluate the quality of the results and possibilities for improvement. I. Introduction he giant planets have a special place in our quest for learning about the origins of our planetary system and Tour search for life, and robotic missions are essential tools for this scientific goal. Missions to the outer planets arXiv:2001.04357v1 [astro-ph.EP] 8 Jan 2020 have been prioritized by NASA and ESA, and this has resulted in important space projects for the exploration of the Jupiter system (NASA’s Europa Clipper [1] and ESA’s Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer [2]), and studies are underway to launch a follow-up of Cassini/Huygens called Titan Saturn System Mission (TSSM) [3], a joint ESA-NASA project.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time On-Orbit Calibration of Angles Between Star Sensor and Earth Observation Camera for Optical Surveying and Mapping Satellites
    ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume IV-2/W5, 2019 ISPRS Geospatial Week 2019, 10–14 June 2019, Enschede, The Netherlands REAL-TIME ON-ORBIT CALIBRATION OF ANGLES BETWEEN STAR SENSOR AND EARTH OBSERVATION CAMERA FOR OPTICAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING SATELLITES Wei Liu 1*, Hui Wang 2, Weijiao Jiang 2, Fangming Qian 3, Leiming Zhu 4 1 Xi’an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping, No.1 Middle Yanta Road, Xi’an, China - [email protected] 2 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Network, Xidian University, Xi’an, China - [email protected] 2 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Network, Xidian University, Xi’an, China - [email protected] 3 Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, China - [email protected] 4 Centre of TH-Satellite of China, Beijing, China - [email protected] Commission I, WG I/4 KEY WORDS: Star Sensor, Attitude Measurement, Error Analysis, On-Orbit Calibration, Angle between Cameras, On-orbit Monitoring Device ABSTRACT: On space remote sensing stereo mapping field, the angle variation between the star sensor’s optical axis and the earth observation camera’s optical axis on-orbit affects the positioning accuracy, when optical mapping is without ground control points (GCPs). This work analyses the formation factors and elimination methods for both the star sensor’s error and the angles error between the star sensor’s optical axis and the earth observation camera’s optical axis. Based on that, to improve the low attitude stability and long calibration time necessary of current satellite cameras, a method is then proposed for real-time on-orbit calibration of the angles between star sensor’s optical axis and the earth observation camera’s optical axis based on the principle of auto-collimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Policy Directive 1 New Shepard Flies Again 5
    BUSINESS | POLITICS | PERSPECTIVE DECEMBER 18, 2017 INSIDE ■ Space Policy Directive 1 ■ New Shepard fl ies again ■ 5 bold predictions for 2018 VISIT SPACENEWS.COM FOR THE LATEST IN SPACE NEWS INNOVATION THROUGH INSIGNT CONTENTS 12.18.17 DEPARTMENTS 3 QUICK TAKES 6 NEWS Blue Origin’s New Shepard flies again Trump establishes lunar landing goal 22 COMMENTARY John Casani An argument for space fission reactors 24 ON NATIONAL SECURITY Clouds of uncertainty over miltary space programs 26 COMMENTARY Rep. Brian Babin and Rep. Ami Ber We agree, Mr. President,. America should FEATURE return to the moon 27 COMMENTARY Rebecca Cowen- 9 Hirsch We honor the 10 Paving a clear “Path” to winners of the first interoperable SATCOM annual SpaceNews awards. 32 FOUST FORWARD Third time’s the charm? SpaceNews will not publish an issue Jan. 1. Our next issue will be Jan. 15. Visit SpaceNews.com, follow us on Twitter and sign up for our newsletters at SpaceNews.com/newsletters. ON THE COVER: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION THIS PAGE: SPACENEWS ILLUSTRATION FOLLOW US @SpaceNews_Inc Fb.com/SpaceNewslnc youtube.com/user/SpaceNewsInc linkedin.com/company/spacenews SPACENEWS.COM | 1 VOLUME 28 | ISSUE 25 | $4.95 $7.50 NONU.S. CHAIRMAN EDITORIAL CORRESPONDENTS ADVERTISING SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Felix H. Magowan EDITORINCHIEF SILICON VALLEY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TOLL FREE IN U.S. [email protected] Brian Berger Debra Werner Paige McCullough Tel: +1-866-429-2199 Tel: +1-303-443-4360 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fax: +1-845-267-3478 +1-571-356-9624 Tel: +1-571-278-4090 CEO LONDON OUTSIDE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Rendezvous-Maneuver Plan for Lunar-Landing Missions
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7388 00 00 APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - EVOLUTION OF THE RENDEZVOUS-MANEUVER PLAN FOR LUNAR-LANDING MISSIONS by Jumes D. Alexunder und Robert We Becker Lyndon B, Johnson Spuce Center ffoaston, Texus 77058 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. AUGUST 1973 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No, 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA TN D-7388 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date APOLLOEXPERIENCEREPORT August 1973 EVOLUTIONOFTHERENDEZVOUS-MANEUVERPLAN 6. Performing Organizatlon Code FOR THE LUNAR-LANDING MISSIONS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. James D. Alexander and Robert W. Becker, JSC JSC S-334 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address I - 924-22-20- 00- 72 Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Houston, Texas 77058 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Note I National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20546 I 15. Supplementary Notes The JSC Director waived the use of the International System of Units (SI) for this Apollo Experience I Report because, in his judgment, the use of SI units would impair the usefulness of the report or I I result in excessive cost. 16. Abstract The evolution of the nominal rendezvous-maneuver plan for the lunar landing missions is presented along with a summary of the significant developments for the lunar module abort and rescue plan. A general discussion of the rendezvous dispersion analysis that was conducted in support of both the nominal and contingency rendezvous planning is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding Expertise at the Service of Your Ambitions
    OUTSTANDING EXPERTISE AT THE SERVICE OF YOUR AMBITIONS #enablingyourambitions MILLION TURNOVER IN 2017 ambitions your EMPLOYEES INCLUDING ING 60% ENGINEERS OUR GOAL: L 70+ TO COMBINE‘‘ ENAB TECHNOLOGICAL EXCELLENCE AND 360 COMPETITIVENESS SODERN TO TRANSFORM OUR CUSTOMERS’ AMBITIONS 2 INTO REALITIES.‘‘ OUR DNA Franck Poirrier, CEO of Sodern We rely on more than 50 years of experience sharehoLDers: ArianeGroUP (90%) in optronics and neutron technology AND CEA (10%) 16600 to develop innovative and competitive solutions for our commercial and institutional customers. M2 OF FACILITIES 2 KEY AREAS As a subsidiary of the We preserve and enhance To meet the expectations of OF KNOW-HOW: European leader in access this exceptional technological changing markets, we set high OPTRONIC, to space, ArianeGroup, know-how by participating in competitive requirements for NEUtron we are operationally scientific programs that push ourselves: the implementation technoLOGY independent. the limits of the state of the of lean management, perfect art: the caesium atom clock understanding of our We are also a historical and Pharao, the seismometer of customers’ needs, agility and strategic defence supplier, a the Mars mission InSight, cells optimisation of production characteristic that guarantees of Pockels for the Megajoule costs are the commitments us a solid base of industrial laser, etc. that allow us to maintain a activities, thereby affirming competitive edge with a very durability and reliability. Sodern’s core business is the high level of customer Our institutional clients’ high series production of star satisfaction, and to consolidate level of requirements has led trackers that enable satellites our position as a world leader us to develop an extraordinary to orient themselves precisely in in several markets.
    [Show full text]
  • IASI: a Review of Instrument Performance and Characterizations
    IASI: a Review of Instrument Performance and Characterizations D. Siméonia, D. Blumsteinb, P. Astruca, C. Degrellea, B. Chetritea, B. Tournierd, G. Chalonb, T. Carlierb, G. Kayalc a ALCATEL SPACE -10 Bd du Midi BP99-06156 Cannes La Bocca Cedex - France, b CNES - 18 avenue Edouard Belin – 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 – France c EUMETSAT – Am Kavalleriesant 31, D-64295 Darmstadt – Germany d NOVELTIS-Parc Tech du Canal – 2, av. de l’Europe – 31526 Ramonville St Agne Cedex-France Corporate Communications IASI Payload of the European Meteorological Polar-Orbit Satellites METOP Mains missions: weather predictions and climate studies. Program led by the French National Space Agency CNES in association with the European Meteorological Satellite Organization EUMETSAT. Prime Contractor: Thales Alenia Space Dimensions of sounder : 1.1x1.1x1.2 m3 Mass sounder < 200 Kg Stiffness > 55Hz during launch Power consumption < 200 Watt Reliability > 0.8 Availability > 97.5 % over 5 years 2 All rights reserved © 2007, Thales Alenia Space IASI Payload of the European Meteorological Polar-Orbit Satellites METOP Mains missions: weather predictions and climate studies. Program led by the French National Space Agency CNES in association with the European Meteorological Satellite Organization EUMETSAT. Prime Contractor: Thales Alenia Space Dimensions of sounder : 1.1x1.1x1.2 m3 Mass sounder < 200 Kg Stiffness > 55Hz during launch Power consumption < 200 Watt Reliability > 0.8 Availability > 97.5 % over 5 years Status : - EM delivered in Dec 2001 - PFM delivered in July
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Transfer Maneuvers from Initial
    Revista Mexicana de Astronom´ıa y Astrof´ısica, 52, 283–295 (2016) ANALYSIS OF TRANSFER MANEUVERS FROM INITIAL CIRCULAR ORBIT TO A FINAL CIRCULAR OR ELLIPTIC ORBIT M. A. Sharaf1 and A. S. Saad2,3 Received March 14 2016; accepted May 16 2016 RESUMEN Presentamos un an´alisis de las maniobras de transferencia de una ´orbita circu- lar a una ´orbita final el´ıptica o circular. Desarrollamos este an´alisis para estudiar el problema de las transferencias impulsivas en las misiones espaciales. Consideramos maniobras planas usando ecuaciones reci´enobtenidas; con estas ecuaciones se com- paran las maniobras circulares y el´ıpticas. Esta comparaci´on es importante para el dise˜no´optimo de misiones espaciales, y permite obtener mapeos ´utiles para mostrar cu´al es la mejor maniobra. Al respecto, desarrollamos este tipo de comparaciones mediante 10 resultados, y los mostramos gr´aficamente. ABSTRACT In the present paper an analysis of the transfer maneuvers from initial circu- lar orbit to a final circular or elliptic orbit was developed to study the problem of impulsive transfers for space missions. It considers planar maneuvers using newly derived equations. With these equations, comparisons of circular and elliptic ma- neuvers are made. This comparison is important for the mission designers to obtain useful mappings showing where one maneuver is better than the other. In this as- pect, we developed this comparison throughout ten results, together with some graphs to show their meaning. Key Words: celestial mechanics — methods: analytical — space vehicles 1. INTRODUCTION The large amount of information from interplanetary missions, such as Pioneer (Dyer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Closed-Form Optimal Impulsive Control of Spacecraft Relative Motion Using Reachable Set Theory
    Closed-Form Optimal Impulsive Control of Spacecraft Relative Motion Using Reachable Set Theory Michelle Chernick ∗ and Simone D’Amico † Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305 This paper addresses the spacecraft relative orbit reconfiguration problem of minimizing the delta-v cost of impulsive control actions while achieving a desired state in fixed time. The problem is posed in relative orbit element (ROE) space, which yields insight into relative motion geometry and allows for the straightforward inclusion of perturbations in linear time- variant form. Reachable set theory is used to translate the cost-minimization problem into a geometric path-planning problem and formulate the reachable delta-v minimum, a new metric to assess optimality and quantify reachability of a maneuver scheme. Next, this paper presents a methodology to compute maneuver schemes that meet this new optimality criteria and achieve a prescribed reconfiguration. Though the methodology is applicable to any linear time-variant system, this paper leverages a state representation in ROE to derive new globally optimal maneuver schemes in orbits of arbitrary eccentricity. The methodology is also used to generate quantifiably sub-optimal solutions when the optimal solutions are unreachable. Further, this paper determines the mathematical impact of uncertainties on achieving the desired end state and provides a geometric visualization of those effects on the reachable set. The proposed algorithms are tested in realistic reconfiguration scenarios and validated in a high-fidelity simulation environment. I. Introduction istributed space systems enable advanced missions in fields such as astronomy and astrophysics, planetary science, Dand space infrastructure by employing the collective usage of two or more cooperative spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Or Monolithic? a Computational Architecture
    TO APPEAR IN IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2016.2594290 1 Distributed or Monolithic? A Computational Architecture Decision Framework Mohsen Mosleh, Kia Dalili, and Babak Heydari Abstract—Distributed architectures have become ubiquitous in Distributed architecture is a common approach to increase many complex technical and socio-technical systems because of system flexibility and responsiveness. In a distributed architec- their role in improving uncertainty management, accommodating ture, subsystems are often physically separated and exchange multiple stakeholders, and increasing scalability and evolvability. This departure from monolithic architectures provides a system resources through standard interfaces. Advances in networking with more flexibility and robustness in response to uncertainties technology, together with increasing system flexibility require- that it may confront during its lifetime. Distributed architecture ments, has made distributed architecture a ubiquitous theme does not provide benefits only, as it can increase cost and in many complex technical systems. Examples can be seen complexity of the system and result in potential instabilities. in many engineering systems: Distributed Generation, which The mechanisms behind this trade-off, however, are analogous to those of the widely-studied transition from integrated to modular is an approach to employ numerous small-scale decentralized architectures. In this paper, we use a conceptual decision frame- technologies to produce electricity close to the end users of work that unifies modularity and distributed architecture on a power, as opposed to the use of few large-scale monolithic five-stage systems architecture spectrum. We add an extensive and centralized power plants [2]; Wireless Sensor Networks, computational layer to the framework and explain how this can in which spatially distributed autonomous sensors collect data enhance decision making about the level of modularity of the architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • ORBIT MANOUVERS • Orbital Plane Change (Inclination) It Is an Orbital
    UNIVERSITY OF ANBAR ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR 4th CLASS STUDENTS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING by: Dr. Naser Al-Falahy ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING WE EK 4 ORBIT MANOUVERS Orbital plane change (inclination) It is an orbital maneuver aimed at changing the inclination of an orbiting body's orbit. This maneuver is also known as an orbital plane change as the plane of the orbit is tipped. This maneuver requires a change in the orbital velocity vector (delta v) at the orbital nodes (i.e. the point where the initial and desired orbits intersect, the line of orbital nodes is defined by the intersection of the two orbital planes). In general, inclination changes can take a very large amount of delta v to perform, and most mission planners try to avoid them whenever possible to conserve fuel. This is typically achieved by launching a spacecraft directly into the desired inclination, or as close to it as possible so as to minimize any inclination change required over the duration of the spacecraft life. When both orbits are circular (i.e. e = 0) and have the same radius the Delta-v (Δvi) required for an inclination change (Δvi) can be calculated using: where: v is the orbital velocity and has the same units as Δvi (Δi ) inclination change required. Example Calculate the velocity change required to transfer a satellite from a circular 600 km orbit with an inclination of 28 degrees to an orbit of equal size with an inclination of 20 degrees. SOLUTION, r = (6,378.14 + 600) × 1,000 = 6,978,140 m , ϑ = 28 - 20 = 8 degrees Vi = SQRT[ GM / r ] Vi = SQRT[ 3.986005×1014 / 6,978,140 ] Vi = 7,558 m/s Δvi = 2 × Vi × sin(ϑ/2) Δvi = 2 × 7,558 × sin(8/2) Δvi = 1,054 m/s 18 UNIVERSITY OF ANBAR ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FOR 4th CLASS STUDENTS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING by: Dr.
    [Show full text]