DOCSLIB.ORG

Slime Molds in the Laboratory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Slime Molds in the Laboratory How- -o -Do-It Slime Molds in the Laboratory Steven L. Stephenson FairmontState College Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/44/2/119/39769/4447422.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 Fairmont,West Virginia 26554 The plasmodial slime molds, or most fruiting bodies are quite small, true fungi, lichens, and mosses- Myxomycetes, are a small (about most measuring only a few milli- which occur in similar situations. As 450 known species), rather insignifi- meters in height, suitable substrates a result, students are given an oppor- cant, but widely distributed group of must be carefully examined in order tunity to become more aware of a organisms having characteristics of to locate any specimens which may number of other less conspicuous both plants and animals. They pro- be present. One decaying log will inhabitantsof the natural world. duce fruiting bodies and spores often yield several differentspecies. Collecting slime molds requires similarto those of many fungi. How- Few if any students will be familiar very little in the way of special equip - ever, the free-living, multinucleate, with the group, but on the initial ment, although a sheath or pocket assimilative stage (the plasmodium) collecting foray, after gaining first- knife is useful for removing portions in the slime mold life cycle is totally hand evidence of their relative of the substrate bearing fruiting unlike anything produced by fungi abundance, many will probably ex- bodies. Because of their fragile or plants (Martin and Alexopoulos press amazement at never having nature, specimens should be placed 1969). The use of slime molds in noticed them before. The careful directly into small cardboard boxes the laboratory is usually limited to searching required to successfully or metal cans. Particularly delicate living cultures of the plasmodium of locate slime mold fruiting bodies will specimens can be loosely wrapped a single species, Physarum poly- undoubtedly have a much desired in tissue paper to protect them from cephalum, obtainable from most side effect: it will invariablydirect the damage while being transported back biological supply houses. However, students' attention to representatives to the laboratory. Upon returning slime mold fruiting bodies collected of various groups of organisms-the from the field, the containers should in Nature also have considerable potential value in laboratory studies, especially those involving taxonomy or classification. Because of their small size and the types of situations in which they occur, slime molds are usually over- looked in Nature. However, during the warmer months of the year, especially after a period of rainy weather, the fruiting bodies of a surprising number of species can be collected in virtuallyany region of the country -if one knows where to look ,,6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4 for them! Fruiting bodies are most abundant in moist, forested areas, where they occur on the decaying wood of logs and stumps, leaf litter, FIGURE 1. The egg-shaped fruitingbodies of Trichiafavoginea occur in closely packed clusters and other similar substrates. Since on well-decayed wood. (Magnificationx 10) HOW-TO-DO-IT 119 be opened and the specimens set aside to dry at room temperature. Most collectors then glue the speci- men to the inside-on either the bot- tom or the lid-of a small cardboard box for permanent storage. I have found that small trays approximately 1-1/2" x 3" x 3/4" work just as well. The relatively small size of the stor- age containers permits a considerable number of specimens to be stored in limited space. A single drawer will probably accommodate all but the largest collections. Fortunately, slime mold fruiting bodies are quite resist- Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/44/2/119/39769/4447422.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 ant to most insects and other pests which often plague collections of preserved plant specimens. Although the small size of some FIGURE 2. The slender, cylindricalfruiting bodies of Stemonitis axifera may sometimes reach a slime mold fruiting bodies can pro- height of 20 millimeters. (Magnificationx 5) vide real challenges, their intricate beauty may very well suggest pos- sible projects for students interested in photography. Additionally, rela- tively few biologists have studied the slime molds to any real extent, and distributional data are rather limited for some regions of the coun- try. Consequently, students so in- clined could make real contributions to science with some diligent collect- ing. Identification of slime molds is based upon such features as the gross structure of the fruiting body, spore color in mass, nature of the capilli- tium, and the presence or absence of lime deposits. The capillitium, a net- work of threadlike elements found FIGUJRE3. The fruiting bodies of Metatrichia vesparium, an extremely common species look within the spore mass of many like miniaturewasps' nests. (Magnificationx 7.5) species, is a structure of remarkable beauty in such genera as Trichia (fig. 1) and Hemitrichia. Although Taxonomic concepts are well having the students construct their some important diagnostic features illustrated in this group, as all of the own keys to slime molds. can be observed with a hand lens or orders, most families, and most The only non-technical, yet fairly magnifying glass, many others are genera (and in some instances, even comprehensive, guide to the slime evident only through examination species) are relatively easy to recog- molds currently available is Farr's with a microscope. Practically all of nize. Some of the genera commonly How to Know the True Slime Molds these features are readily discernible encountered, in addition to the two (1981), although a few taxa are con- with the magnification possible using mentioned above, include Lycogala, sidered in How to Know the Protozoa the standard laboratory microscope Arcyria, Fuligo, Physarum, Stemon- (Jahn and Jahn 1979). The most available in most high schools and itis (fig. 2), Comatricha, and Meta- comprehensive taxonomic treatment colleges, although having an instru- trichia (fig. 3). After a majorityof the is The Myxomycetes by Martin and ment equipped with an ocular micro- specimens collected in the field have Alexopoulos (1969). The Mycetozoa meter and an oil immersion objective been at least tentatively identified, of North America (Hagelstein 1944) is a prerequisite for the accurate they can then serve as the basis for is also quite useful. determination of some features. a laboratory exercise which involves (Continued on p. 127) 120 THE AMERICAN BIOLOGYTEACHER, VOLUME44, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 1982 CROCKER, D.W., and BARR, D.W. HOBBS, H.R., Jr. 1972. Crayfishes HUXLEY, T.H. 1880. The crayfish. 1968. Handbook of the crayfishes of (Astacidae) of North and Middle New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Ontario. Toronto: University of To- America. Environmental Protection Inc. ronto Press. Agency Biota of Freshwater Ecosys- MEREDITH, W.G., and SCHWARTZ. EDMONDS, W.T. 1976. Collecting and tem Identification Manual No. 9. F.J. 1960. Marylandcrayfishes. Educa- preserving Kansas invertebrates. Tech- Washington, D.C.: Environmental tional Series No. 46. Solomon, Md.: nical Publication No. 3. Lawrence, Protection Agency. Maryland Department of Research Kan.: State Biological Survey of . 1974. A checklist of North and and Education. Kansas. Middle American crayfishes (Deca- PENNAK, R.W. 1978. Fresh-water in- pods: Astacidae and Cambaridae). vertebrates of the United States. New Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology York: John Wiley & Sons. No. 166. Washington.D.C.: Smith- sonian Institution. Erratum Slime Molds Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/44/2/119/39769/4447422.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 . from p.120 The following was inadvertently omitted from "Makingthe Most of Onion Root Tip Mitosis"(ABT 43 References (7): 386): FARR, M.L. 1981. How to know the true The author respectfully acknowl- slime molds. Dubuque. Iowa: William edges that the root elongation exer- C. Brown Company. cise described in this paper is based HAGELSTEIN,R. 1944. The mycetozoa of North America. Mineola. N.Y.: on an exercise originally devised by self-published. Professor Emeritus Ernst C. Abbe JAHN, T.L., and JAHN, F.F. 1979. How and used by him for many years in to know the protozoa. 2nd ed. Du- introductory botany and plant buque, Iowa: William C. Brown Com- anatomy courses at the University pany. MARTIN, G.W., of Minnesota. and ALEXOPOULOS, C.J. 1969. The myxomycetes. Iowa MarshallD. Sundberg City: Universityof Iowa Press. Universityof Wisconsin-EauClaire Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701 HOW-TO-DO-IT 127 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burmese Amber Taxa
    Burmese (Myanmar) amber taxa, on-line supplement v.2021.1 Andrew J. Ross 21/06/2021 Principal Curator of Palaeobiology Department of Natural Sciences National Museums Scotland Chambers St. Edinburgh EH1 1JF E-mail: [email protected] Dr Andrew Ross | National Museums Scotland (nms.ac.uk) This taxonomic list is a supplement to Ross (2021) and follows the same format. It includes taxa described or recorded from the beginning of January 2021 up to the end of May 2021, plus 3 species that were named in 2020 which were missed. Please note that only higher taxa that include new taxa or changed/corrected records are listed below. The list is until the end of May, however some papers published in June are listed in the ‘in press’ section at the end, but taxa from these are not yet included in the checklist. As per the previous on-line checklists, in the bibliography page numbers have been added (in blue) to those papers that were published on-line previously without page numbers. New additions or changes to the previously published list and supplements are marked in blue, corrections are marked in red. In Ross (2021) new species of spider from Wunderlich & Müller (2020) were listed as being authored by both authors because there was no indication next to the new name to indicate otherwise, however in the introduction it was indicated that the author of the new taxa was Wunderlich only. Where there have been subsequent taxonomic changes to any of these species the authorship has been corrected below.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Chapter 19 Kingdom Protista Domain Eukarya Description Kingdom Protista Is the Most Diverse of All the Kingdoms
    Biology Chapter 19 Kingdom Protista Domain Eukarya Description Kingdom Protista is the most diverse of all the kingdoms. Protists are eukaryotes that are not animals, plants, or fungi. Some unicellular, some multicellular. Some autotrophs, some heterotrophs. Some with cell walls, some without. Didinium protist devouring a Paramecium protist that is longer than it is! Read about it on p. 573! Where Do They Live? • Because of their diversity, we find protists in almost every habitat where there is water or at least moisture! Common Examples • Ameba • Algae • Paramecia • Water molds • Slime molds • Kelp (Sea weed) Classified By: (DON’T WRITE THIS DOWN YET!!! • Mode of nutrition • Cell walls present or not • Unicellular or multicellular Protists can be placed in 3 groups: animal-like, plantlike, or funguslike. Didinium, is a specialist, only feeding on Paramecia. They roll into a ball and form cysts when there is are no Paramecia to eat. Paramecia, on the other hand are generalists in their feeding habits. Mode of Nutrition Depends on type of protist (see Groups) Main Groups How they Help man How they Hurt man Ecosystem Roles KEY CONCEPT Animal-like protists = PROTOZOA, are single- celled heterotrophs that can move. Oxytricha Reproduce How? • Animal like • Unicellular – by asexual reproduction – Paramecium – does conjugation to exchange genetic material Animal-like protists Classified by how they move. macronucleus contractile vacuole food vacuole oral groove micronucleus cilia • Protozoa with flagella are zooflagellates. – flagella help zooflagellates swim – more than 2000 zooflagellates • Some protists move with pseudopods = “false feet”. – change shape as they move –Ex. amoebas • Some protists move with pseudopods.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturing Slime Mold
    Culturing Slime Mold Live Material Care Guide SCIENTIFIC BIO Background FAX! Plasmodial slime mold (phylum Myxomycota) lives in dark, moist environments such as under the bark of decaying logs, among mulch, or beneath decaying leaves. Slime mold classification is once again changing. They were in Protista due to their amoeboid-like properties. In the past, slime molds were considered a fungus because they produce fruiting bodies and spores used for reproduction. Slime molds are a group notable for its unwillingness to be neatly classified! Frequently bright in color and large in size (up to 30 cm in diameter), plasmodial slime molds consist of many amoeba-like cells, which form a mass of protoplasm called myxomycota. The organisms are capable of very slow, creeping movement by means of cytoplasmic streaming. During the reproductive stage, called pseudoplasmodium, slime molds tend to migrate to a well-lit area, such as the top of a log, where less moisture is present. They form into a slug-like mass and produce reproductive fruiting bodies, which contain spores. Under adverse conditions (lack of food, water, light, warmth, or pH changes), the organism dries out and forms a hardened mass called a sclerotium. These sclerotia may also grow fruiting bodies, but do not release spores into the environ- ment until conditions once again become favorable for growth. Spores are transported by wind, which results in the spreading of slime molds to new areas. Sclerotium (unfavorable conditions) Pseudoplasmodium (favorable conditions) Aggregate (plasmodial stage) Amoeba/spores Reproductive Fruiting Bodies Figure 1. Life Cycle of Slime Mold Culturing/Media Slime mold is typically cultured from sclerotia rather than from spores.
    [Show full text]
  • S41598-020-68694-9.Pdf
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Delayed cytokinesis generates multinuclearity and potential advantages in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii Nef strain Théo Quinet1, Ascel Samba‑Louaka2, Yann Héchard2, Karine Van Doninck1 & Charles Van der Henst1,3,4,5* Multinuclearity is a widespread phenomenon across the living world, yet how it is achieved, and the potential related advantages, are not systematically understood. In this study, we investigate multinuclearity in amoebae. We observe that non‑adherent amoebae are giant multinucleate cells compared to adherent ones. The cells solve their multinuclearity by a stretchy cytokinesis process with cytosolic bridge formation when adherence resumes. After initial adhesion to a new substrate, the progeny of the multinucleate cells is more numerous than the sibling cells generated from uninucleate amoebae. Hence, multinucleate amoebae show an advantage for population growth when the number of cells is quantifed over time. Multiple nuclei per cell are observed in diferent amoeba species, and the lack of adhesion induces multinuclearity in diverse protists such as Acanthamoeba castellanii, Vermamoeba vermiformis, Naegleria gruberi and Hartmannella rhysodes. In this study, we observe that agitation induces a cytokinesis delay, which promotes multinuclearity. Hence, we propose the hypothesis that multinuclearity represents a physiological adaptation under non‑adherent conditions that can lead to biologically relevant advantages. Te canonical view of eukaryotic cells is usually illustrated by an uninucleate organization. However, in the liv- ing world, cells harbouring multiple nuclei are common. Tis multinuclearity can have diferent origins, being either generated (i) by fusion events between uninucleate cells or by (ii) uninucleate cells that replicate their DNA content without cytokinesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity
    Glime, J. M. 2019. Slime Molds: Biology and Diversity. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological 3-1-1 Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SLIME MOLDS: BIOLOGY AND DIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Slime Molds? ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Identification Difficulties ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1- Reproduction and Colonization ........................................................................................................................... 3-1-5 General Life Cycle ....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 Seasonal Changes ......................................................................................................................................... 3-1-7 Environmental Stimuli ............................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 Light .................................................................................................................................................... 3-1-13 pH and Volatile Substances
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Cellular Slime Molds John Tyler Bonner Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University
    A Brief History of the Cellular Slime Molds John Tyler Bonner Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Fungi have been known and their unique character recognized ter and that this paper was his Ph.D. work. Unfortunately, he left for as long as there has been natural history. They were known to biology, and this was his last contribution to science. Aristotle which puts an early well established mention of them From 1900 onward there were two main thrusts in cellular well over 3000 years ago. By contrast, the cellular slime molds slime mold research: one was systematics that led more recently were first discovered a mere 140 years ago. The reason for this to phylogeny, and the other is a search for the mechanisms under- great discrepancy is obvious: cellular slime molds are minute lying their development and behavior. The first has been carried and inconspicuous compared to huge, eye-catching mushrooms. out by a small group of individuals compared to the latter, which And there are other such examples all stemming from the rise of has become an industry. microscopy in the 19th century. Perhaps best of all is the stun- The discovery of new species has risen steadily. The two of ning work of Roland Thaxter, who discovered two entirely new Brefeld and a few others described by others in the latter part groups of organisms: the myxobacteria and the Laboulbeniales, of the 19th century were brought together by Olive (with some those curious fungi that were previously thought to be the hairs additions of his own) showing about a dozen species in all.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Genome Dynamics in Multinucleate Ascomycete Fungi
    Current Biology 21, R786–R793, September 27, 2011 ª2011 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.042 Nuclear and Genome Dynamics Review in Multinucleate Ascomycete Fungi Marcus Roper1,2, Chris Ellison3, John W. Taylor3, to enhance phenotypic plasticity [5] and is also thought to and N. Louise Glass3,* contribute to fungal virulence [6–8]. Recent and ongoing work reveals two fundamental chal- lenges of multinucleate fungal lifestyles, both in the presence Genetic variation between individuals is essential to evolu- and absence of genotypic diversity — namely, the coordina- tion and adaptation. However, intra-organismic genetic tion of populations of nuclei for growth and other behaviors, variation also shapes the life histories of many organisms, and the suppression of nucleotypic competition during including filamentous fungi. A single fungal syncytium can reproduction and dispersal. The potential for a mycelium to harbor thousands or millions of mobile and potentially harbor fluctuating proportions and distributions of multiple genotypically different nuclei, each having the capacity genotypes led some 20th century mycologists to argue for to regenerate a new organism. Because the dispersal of life-history models that focused on nuclei as the unit of asexual or sexual spores propagates individual nuclei in selection, and on the role of nuclear cooperation and compe- many of these species, selection acting at the level of tition in shaping mycelium growth and behavior [9,10].In nuclei creates the potential for competitive and coopera- particular, nuclear totipotency creates potential for conflict tive genome dynamics. Recent work in Neurospora crassa between heterogeneous nuclear populations within a myce- and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum has illuminated how nuclear lium [11,12].
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of ​Physarum Polycephalum​Growth Rate On
    AP Research Comparison of Physarum Polycephalum Growth Rate on ​ ​ Various Nutrients Word count: 4,003 Comparison of Physarum Polycephalum Growth Rate on Various Nutrients ​ ​ Abstract The growth rate of Physarum Polycephalum (slime mold) was measured to determine ​ ​ what type of food results in the largest increase in surface area across a petri dish. Old fashioned oat flakes, the most commonly used nutrient for slime mold, was compared against 5 other food sources to determine if there is a food other than oat flakes that could yield a higher growth rate. The growth rates were measured with time lapse cameras over the course of three days. Over the duration of the recorded growth, it was concluded that the old fashioned oat flakes yielded the highest growth rate. Introduction Slime mold is a single celled protist that is visible to the naked eye. Slime mold is naturally found in the dark, moist climates that exist on decaying leaves and logs in forest areas. The protist consumes fungal spores, bacteria, and other microbes by means of engulfing (Dagamac 2015). To find its prey, slime mold is able to explore its environment “by spontaneous and self-organised oscillatory contractions” (Jones 2015). This means that the slime mold is able to contract its body in an organized way, allowing the slime mold to slowly push itself in all directions. When a slime mold encounters a new food source, it is able to connect the new food source to it’s pre existing ones. To conserve mass, the slime mold gradually funnels the link between the food sources to a single ‘protoplasmic’ tube.
    [Show full text]
  • Multinucleate Cell Angiohistiocytoma
    To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter Toppan Best-set. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication. These proofs may contain color(colour) figures. Those figures may print black and white in the final printed book if a color(colour) print product has not been planned. The color(colour) figures will appear in color(colour) in all electronic versions of this book. s0060 MULTINUCLEATE CELL ANGIOHISTIOCYTOMA s0065 Definition • Fibroblast-like and histiocyte-like mononuclear cells u0390 p0300 • A distinctive benign dermal proliferation composed • Thickened collagen bundles, frequently hyalinized u0395 of thin-walled capillaries and veins, admixed with • Occasional inflammatory cells, predominantly u0400 scattered multinucleated cells lymphocytes • Hemorrhage absent, no hemosiderin deposition u0405 s0070 Clinical features • Decreased elastic fibers in the dermis can be observed u0410 s0075 Epidemiology • Overlying epidermis normal, but can also be u0415 p0310 • Female predominance (F:M = 3 : 1) hyperplastic u0275 • Middle-aged adult patients • Proliferation restricted to upper and middermis u0420 s0080 Presentation Immunopathology/special stains s0100 p0325 • Slowly growing single or multiple firm, red-brown to • Multinucleated cells display variable CD68 positivity
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Parasite Relationships of Atalodera Spp. (Heteroderidae) M
    234 Journal of Nematology, Volume 15, No. 2, April 1983 and D. I. Edwards. 1972. Interaction of Meloidogyne 18. Volterra, V. 1931. Variations and fluctuations naasi, Pratylenchus penetrans, and Tylenchorhyn- of the number of individuals in animal species chus agri on creeping bentgrass. J. Nematol. 4:~ living together. Pp. 409-448 tn R. N. Chapman ed. 162-165. Animal ecology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Host-Parasite Relationships of Atalodera spp. (Heteroderidae) M. ]~'IUNDO-OCAMPOand J. G. BALDWIN r Abstract: Atalodera ucri, Wouts and Sher, 1971, and ,4. lonicerae, (Wonts, 1973) Luc et al., 1978, induce similar multinucleate syncytia in roots of golden bush and honeysuckle, respec- tively. The syncytium is initiated in the cortex; as it expands, it includes several partially delimited syncytial units and distorts vascular tissue. Outer walls of the syncytium are rela- tively smooth and thickest near the feeding site of the nematode; inner walls are interrupted by perforations which enlarge as syncytial units increa~ in size. The cytoplasm of the syncytium is granular and includes numermts plastids, mit(~chondria, vacuoles, Golgi, and a complex network of membranes. Nuclei are greatly enlarged and amoeboid in shape. Although more than one nucleus sometimes occur in a given syncytial unit, no mitotic activity was observed. Syncytia induced by species of Atalodera chiefly differ from those of Heterodera sensu lato by the absence of cell wall ingrowths; wall ingrowths increase solute transport and characterize transfer cells. In syncytia of Atalodera spp., a high incidence of pits and pit fields in walls adjacent to vasctdar elements suggests that in this case plasmodesmata provide the pathway for increased entry of sohttes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cellular Slime Mold: Eukaryotic Model Microorganism
    Exp. Anim. 58(2), 97–104, 2009 —Review— Review Series: Animal Bioresource in Japan The Cellular Slime Mold: Eukaryotic Model Microorganism Hideko URUSHIHARA Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1–1–1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan Abstract: Cellular slime molds are eukaryotic microorganisms in the soil. They feed on bacteria as solitary amoebae but conditionally construct multicellular forms in which cell differentiation takes place. Therefore, they are attractive for the study of fundamental biological phenomena such as phagocytosis, cell division, chemotactic movements, intercellular communication, cell differentiation, and morphogenesis. The most widely used species, Dictyostelium discoideum, is highly amenable to experimental manipulation and can be used with most recent molecular biological techniques. Its genome and cDNA analyses have been completed and well-annotated data are publicly available. A larger number of orthologues of human disease-related genes were found in D. discoideum than in yeast. Moreover, some pathogenic bacteria infect Dictyostelium amoebae. Thus, this microorganism can also offer a good experimental system for biomedical research. The resources of cellular slime molds, standard strains, mutants, and genes are maintained and distributed upon request by the core center of the National BioResource Project (NBRP-nenkin) to support Dictyostelium community users as well as new users interested in new platforms for research and/or phylogenic consideration. Key words: cell differentiation, chemotaxis, Dictyostelium discoideum, human genes, pathogen infection Introduction: Why Microorganisms? molecular cloning. Likewise, dictyostelids can offer a remarkable experimental system especially valuable for The cellular slime moulds, or dictyostelids, are soil eukaryote-specific processes in which E. coli is not in- microorganisms that exhibit conditional multicellularity volved.
    [Show full text]
  • Physarum Polycephalum (Plasmodial Slime Mold)
    Physarum polycephalum (plasmodial slime mold) Species: polycephalum Genus: Physarum Family: Physaraceae Order: Physarales Class: Myxomycetes Phylum: Mycetozoa Kingdom: Amoebozoa Conditions for Customer Ownership We hold permits allowing us to transport these organisms. To access permit conditions, click here. Never purchase living specimens without having a disposition strategy in place. There are currently no USDA permits required for this organism. In order to protect our environment, never release a live laboratory organism into the wild. Primary Hazard Considerations Always wash your hands thoroughly before and after you handle your cultures, or anything it has touched. It is recommended to use gloves when working with mold, fungus, or bacteria. Availability Physarum is available year round. Care Habitat • Plasmodial stage are shipped in a Petri dish on Physarum agar with oats. Your Physarum should be bright yellow in color, and fan shaped. If your Physarum takes on a different appearance it may be contaminated. Contaminated cultures occur when a foreign specimen (something other than Physarum) makes its way onto your culture. This culture should be stored at room temperature in a dark place. The culture should be viable for about 1–2 weeks in its current container. • Sclerotia are hardened masses of irregular form consisting of many minute cell-like components. These are shipped on cut strips of filter paper in a tube. The culture should be stored at room temperature and can be stored in this stage for several months. Care: • Physarum is subcultured onto Physarum agar, and is incubated at room temperature or 25 °C. To maintain viability, plasmodial Physarum should be subcultured weekly.
    [Show full text]