• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

DMRG Simulation of the SU(3) AFM Heisenberg Model M. Aguado Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Quantenoptik. Hans-Kopfermann-Str. 1. D-85748 Garching, Germany M. Asorey Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain E. Ercolessi, F. Ortolani Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`adi Bologna and INFN, Via Irnerio 46, 40127 Bologna, Italy S. Pasini∗ Lehrstuhl f¨ur Theoretische Physik I, Universit¨at Dortmund, Otto-Hahn Straße 4, 44221 Dortmund, Germany (Dated: October 31, 2018) We analyze the antiferromagnetic SU(3) Heisenberg chain by means of the Density Matrix Renor- malization Group (DMRG). The results confirm that the model is critical and the computation of its central charge and the scaling dimensions of the first excited states show that the underlying low energy conformal field theory is the SU(3)1 Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten model. PACS numbers: 64.60.F, 64.60.ae, 11.25.Hf, 89.70.Cf I. INTRODUCTION rectly related to a particular SU(3)-symmetric bilinear biquadratic spin-1 chain, the Lai-Sutherland (LS) model, which is also known to be critical [9, 10]. In terms of In recent years, a renewed interest in models of con- Conformal Field Theory (CFT) the LS model and the densed matter with a symmetry larger than SU(2) has SU(3) spin chain should belong to the same universality arisen. This is because these models represent not only class, that of the SU(3)1 Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten challenging theoretical problems but also can be effec- (WZNW) model [11, 12]. tively implemented experimentally. In particular SU(4) In this paper we present a numerical analysis of the systems can be realized in laboratories in transition met- SU(3) spin chain by means of the Density Matrix Renor- als oxides [1] where the electron spin is coupled to the or- malization Group (DMRG). After a short description of bital degrees of freedom. A possible realization of SU(3) the model and its mathematical framework (Section II), antiferromagnetic (AFM) spin chains in systems of ultra- we present our new results (Section III) which confirm cold atoms in optical lattices has been recently proposed the criticality of the model as well as its correspondence [2]. In this case the spin would be related to the SU(3) to the Lai-Sutherland model. In particular, due to the rotation in an internal space spanned by the three avail- ability of our program to provide the quantum numbers able atomic states (colors, in the SU(3) language), with for each state, we can show that the excited states of the the condition that the number of particles of each color spin chain have the same quantum numbers as the irre- is conserved. Other examples involve the SU(3) trimer ducible representations (IR) of SU(3). We compute the state in a spin tetrahedron chain [3, 4], or the spin tube scaling dimensions of the first excitations which turn out models in a magnetic field [5] where the low-energy ef- to agree with those of the SU(3)1 WZNW model which fective Hamiltonian can be identified with a particular corresponds to the low energy effective field theory de- anisotropic SU(3) spin chain. scriptions of our spin chain. The results are further con- From a theoretical point of view, the SU(3) spin model firmed by the computation of the central charge by means arXiv:0801.3565v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 25 Sep 2008 has also been studied from different viewpoints. In recent of the vacuum entanglement entropy. years the interest on ferromagnetic SU(N) spin chains has been boosted by their implication in the AdS/CFT correspondence [6, 7]. On the other side the family of II. THE SU(3) MODEL integrable spin chains include some models with SU(3) symmetry, as first shown by Sutherland [8], who gener- We consider the following Heisenberg model alized the Bethe-Ansatz to multiple component systems which include the SU(3) spin chain, showing that it is L gapless. Also the SU(3) Heisenberg model can be di- H = J Si Si (1) · +1 Xi=1 where the spin variables are expressed in terms of the ∗Electronic address: [email protected] generators of SU(3) in the fundamental representation: 2 Sa 1 a ¯ ¯ i = 2 λi , with a = 1, .., 8 and λa the eight Gell-Mann λ λ (Sz,Qz) xλ,λ matrices. The sign of J selects respectively an antifer- (1) (1) (0,0) 0 romagnetic spin chain (J > 0) or a ferromagnetic (FM) (±1/2, 1/2) (3) (1) 1/3 one (J < 0). In the following we shall concentrate only (0, −1) on the AFM case, which has been partially considered (±1/2, −1/2) (3¯) (1) 1/3 also in ref. [13, 14]. (0, 1) In terms of the following ladder operators, T ± = λ1 iλ2, (±1/2, ±3/2) V ± = λ4 iλ5 and U ± = λ6 iλ7, the Hamiltonian± (1) (3) (3¯) 8 (0, 0) (3 times) 2/3 ± becomes ± ± < ( 1, 0) : Table I: Quantum numbers and scaling dimensions for some L of the primary fields Φλ,λ¯ of the SU(3)1 WZNW model. J 1 − − − H = T +T + V +V + U +U + h.c. 2 4 i i+1 i i+1 i i+1 Xi=1 1 3 3 1 8 8 + λi λi+1 + λi λi+1 . (2) algebra su(3) is through the Young Tableau (YT) which 2 2 can be labelled by two positive integer numbers (p, q). Once p and q are known, one can easily compute the di- This makes easier to identify two operators, Sz and Qz, given by the sums of the two diagonal Gell-Mann matri- mension d of the representation and the quantum num- ces bers associated to the isospin Sz and the hypercharge Qz according to [16, 17]: 1 √3 S = λ3 Q = λ8, (3) 1 z 2 i z 2 i d = (p + 1)(q + 1)(p + q + 2) (6) Xi Xi 2 that commute with the Hamiltonian and correspond to and conserved quantities (isospin and hypercharge). The cor- responding quantum numbers label the different eigen- Sz = I, I +1, ..., I 1, I − − − (7) states of (1). 3 The Lai-Sutherland model is defined as the bilinear Qz = 2 Y biquadratic spin-1 chain 1 2 where I = 2 (r + s) and Y = (r s) 3 (p q), with 0 r p , 0 s q . In particular,− − the cases− (1, 0) L and≤ (0,≤1) give≤ respectively≤ the fundamental (3) and the ′ 2 ¯ H = J S˜i S˜i+1 + (S˜i S˜i+1) , (4) anti-fundamental (3) IR, while the singlet representation · · Xi=1 h i (1) corresponds to (0, 0). It has been proved [18] that, in analogy with the SU(2) and characterized by an SU(3) symmetry. The model (4) case, the ground state (GS) of the AFM SU(3) Hamil- and the SU(3) spin chain can be mapped one onto the tonian is a singlet and, since it is made of particles u, other by means of the following identity [15] d and s in equal number, it can be obtained in finite chains having only a number of sites which is a multiple 8 of three, L = 3M. As for the excited states, we expect 2 1 1 a a S˜iS˜i + (S˜iS˜i ) 1= + λ λ . (5) them to be in correspondence with the tower of conformal +1 +1 − 3 2 i i+1 Xa=1 states of the corresponding SU(3) WZNW model. The primary states of this theory are a finite number and are We have already mentioned in the introduction that the given [16] by fields Φλ,λ¯ , whose holomorphic (antiholo- LS model is known to be gapless and to belong to the morphic) part transforms according to a representation same universality class of the SU(3) level-1 Wess-Zumino- λ = (p, q) (λ¯ = (p′, q)) with the values of p, q (and simi- Novikov-Witten model with central charge c = 2. Due to larly of p′, q′) satisfying the condition: p + q k, k being the correspondence between the two models, the SU(3)1 the level. The conformal dimension of the primary≤ field WZNW model has to be the low energy effective criti- is then x ¯ = x + x ′ ′ with cal field theory also for the SU(3) spin chain. We shall λ,λ (p,q) (p ,q ) numerically show that the SU(3) Heisenberg chain is crit- 1 x = (p2 + q2 + pq +3p +3q), (8) ical, and from the energy state obtained from the DMRG, (p,q) 3(k + N) we shall compute the central charge and the scaling di- mensions of (1) and compare them to the values predicted and a similar expression for x(p′,q′). For future reference, for the SU(3)1 WZNW model. the values of xλ,λ¯ for some primary fields in the case of The states of the spin chain can be organized accord- k = 1 are reported in Table I. ing to the irreducible representations of the affine (Kac- To end up this section, we notice that in a finite chain Moody) Lie algebra associated to SU(3). Let us recall of length L not all quantum numbers, i.e. states, may be [16] that a useful way of representing the IR’s of the Lie realized. For examples, working with periodic boundary 3 conditions and with an even number of sites, the singlet -0.49 S =0.0 Q =0.0 L=6M (1) (1) (ground) state, with x = 0, appears only for z z S =0.0 Q =1.0 L=6M+2 × z z chains with L = 6M (with M a positive and integer S =0.0 Q =-1.0 L=6M+4 ¯ z z number), while the (3) (1) (or the (1) (3)) states are S =0.5 Q =1.5 L=6M × × z z present only if L =6M +4 (or L =6M + 2), both with -0.5 Sz=0.0 Qz=2.0 L=6M+2 S =0.0 Q =-2.0 L=6M+4 x =1/3.

Load more

  5

Copy Link