DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends National Wetlands Inventory MARCH 1984 Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Photos on Cover By : Ackerknecht, Childers, Tiner, USFWS WETLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES : CURRENT STATUS AND RECENT TRENDS by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. U .S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat Resources One Gateway Center Newton Corner, Massachusetts 02158 MARCH 1984 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements . i Table of Contents . ii List of Figures . iv List of Tables . vi Executive Summary . vii Introduction . 1 What Is A Wetland? . 2 The Fish and Wildlife Service's Definition . 2 References . 3 Major Wetland Types of the United States . 5 Estuarine Wetlands . 6 Estuarine Emergent Wetlands . 6 Estuarine Intertidal Flats . 6 Estuarine Scrub-Shrub Wetlands . 8 Palustrine Wetlands . 9 Palustrine Emergent Wetlands. 9 Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetlands . 11 Palustrine Forested Wetlands . 11 References . 11 Why Are Wetlands Important? . 13 Fish and Wildlife Values. 13 Fish and Shellfish Habitat . 13 Waterfowl and Other Bird Habitat . .. 14 Furbearer and Other Wildlife Habitat . 16 Environmental Quality Values . 18 Water Quality Improvement . 18 Aquatic Productivity . 19 Socio-Economic Values. 19 Flood and Storm Damage Protection . 21 Erosion Control . 23 Water Supply and Groundwater Recharge . 23 Harvest of Natural Products . 23 Recreation and Aesthetics . 24 Summary . .. 25 References . 26 Current Status and Trends of U.S. Wetlands. 28 Current Status . 28 Forces Changing Wetlands . 30 Recent National Wetland Trends . 30 Recent Gains . 31 Recent Losses . 31 Regional Historical Perspective . 32 Current Regional Development Pressures. 33 National Problem Areas . 35 Estuarine Wetlands of the U.S . Coastal Zone . 36 Louisiana's Coastal Marshes . 37 Chesapeake Bay's Submerged Aquatic Beds . 39 South Florida's Palustrine Wetlands . 40 Prairie Pothole Region's Emergent Wetlands. 42 Wetlands of Nebraska's Sandhills and Rainwater Basin . 46 Forested Wetlands of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Plain . 48 North Carolina's Pocosins . 49 Western Riparian Wetlands . 50 Urban Wetlands . 51 References . 52 The Future of America's Wetlands. 54 Management Recommendations . 56 References . 57 Appendix A. Glossary of Common and Scientific Names of Wetland Plants . 58 List of Figures No. Page 1 Schematic diagram showing wetlands, deepwater habitats, and uplands on landscape . 2 2 The Fish and Wildlife Service's official wetland classification report . 3 3 Classification hierarchy of wetlands and deepwater habitats, showing systems, subsystems, and classes . 4 4 Diagram showing major wetland and deepwater habitat systems . 5 5 Examples of estuarine emergent wetlands . 7 6 Cross-section of a Northeastern salt marsh . 8 7 Examples of estuarine intertidal flats . 8 8 Mangrove-dominated estuarine scrub-shrub wetlands of Florida . 9 9 Examples of palustrine emergent wetlands . 10 10 Generalized vegetation zones of a pothole wetland in relationship to water regime . 10 11 Examples of palustrine scrub-shrub wetlands . 11 12 Examples of palustrine forested wetlands . 12 13 Wetland habitat utilization by several families of birds . 14 14 Migratory birds using wetlands . 15 15 Waterfowl habitat areas of major national concern . 16 16 Wetlands are important to many other wildlife species . 17 17 Aerial view of Tinicum Marsh near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . 19 18 Relative productivity of wetland ecosystems in relation to others . 20 19 Simplified food pathways from estuarine wetland vegetation to commercial and recreational fishes . 20 20 Wetland value in reducing flood crests and flow rates after rainstorms . 21 21 Wetland drainage and filling increase the potential for damaging floods . 22 22 Estuarine-dependent fish, like salmon, provide the majority of the commercial fisheries in the United States . 24 23 Wetlands provide opportunities for recreational fishing . 25 24 Many Americans enjoy watching birds in and around wetlands . 25 25 Relative abundance of wetlands in the U .S. (1984) . 28 26 Extent of wetlands in the conterminous U.S . in the mid-1970's . 29 27 Original and remaining acreages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States
    Pfego-/6^7fV SDMS DocID 463450 ^7'7/ Biological Services Program \ ^ FWS/OBS-79/31 DECEMBER 1979 Superfund Records Center ClassificaHioFF^^^ V\Aetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States KPHODtKtD BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFOR/V^ATION SERVICE U.S. IKPARTMEN TOF COMMERCt SPRINGMflO, VA. 22161 Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) C # The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish . and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues which have an impact on fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the Program is as follows: 1. To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of Information on natural fish and wildlife resources, par­ ticularly with respect to environmental impact assessment. 2. To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decision­ makers in the identification and resolution of problems asso­ ciated with major land and water use changes. 3. To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relating to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process, to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Biological Services research activities and technical assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, the decisionmakers involved and their information neeids, and an evaluation of the state^f-the-art to Identify information gaps and determine priorities. This Is a strategy to assure that the products produced and disseminated will be timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Common Plants at the UHCC
    Flora Checklist Texas Institute for Coastal Prairie Research and Education University of Houston Donald Verser created this list by combining lists from studies by Grace and Siemann with the UHCC herbarium list Herbarium Collections Family Scientific Name Synonym Common Name Native Growth Accesion Dates Locality Comments Status Habit Numbers Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis fringeleaf wild petunia N forb 269 10/9/1973 Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora violet wild petunia N forb Agavaceae Manfreda virginica false aloe N forb Agavaceae Polianthes sp. polianthes ? forb 130 8/3/1971 2004 roadside Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy N woody/vine Apiaceae Centella erecta Centella asiatica erect centella N forb 36 4/11/2000 Area 2 Apiaceae Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace I forb 139-142 1971 / 72 No collections by Dr. Brown. Perhaps Apiaceae Eryngium leavenworthii Leavenworth's eryngo N forb 144 7/20/1971 wooded area in pipeline ROW E. hookeri instead? Apiaceae Eryngium yuccifolium button eryngo N forb 77,143,145 71, 72, 2000 Apiaceae Polytaenia texana Polytaenia nuttallii Texas prairie parsley N forb 32 6/6/2002 Apocynaceae Amsonia illustris Ozark bluestar N Forb 76 3/24/2000 Area 4 Apocynaceae Amsonia tabernaemontana eastern bluestar N Forb Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria yaupon N woody Asclepiadaceae Asclepias lanceolata fewflower milkweed N Forb Not on Dr. Brown's list. Would be great record. Asclepiadaceae Asclepias longifolia longleaf milkweed N Forb 84 6/7/2000 Area 6 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed N Forb 35 6/7/2002 Area 7 Asclepiadaceae Asclepias viridis green antelopehorn N Forb 63, 92 1974 & 2000 Asteraceae Acmella oppositifolia var.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Among Fish Assemblages, Hydroperiods
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 Relationships among fish assemblages, hydroperiods, drought, and American alligators within palustrine wetlands of the Blackjack Peninsula, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas Darrin M. Welchert West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Welchert, Darrin M., "Relationships among fish assemblages, hydroperiods, drought, and American alligators within palustrine wetlands of the Blackjack Peninsula, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3328. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3328 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Relationships among fish assemblages, hydroperiods, drought, and American alligators within palustrine wetlands of the Blackjack Peninsula, Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas Darrin M. Welchert Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources Stuart A.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the Decline of a NATIVE SPECIES by Paige A
    The history of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the decline of a NATIVE SPECIES BY PAIGE A. METTLER-CHERRY AND MARIAN SMITH 34 | The Confluence | Fall 2009 A very important advantage, and one which some, perhaps, will find it hard to credit, is that we could easily go to Florida in boats, and by a very good navigation. There would be but one canal to make … Louis Joliet, 1674, making the earliest known proposal to alter the Illinois River (Hurlbut 1881) Emiquon National Wildlife Refuge as it appears today. The corn and soybean fields (see page 38) have been replaced by the reappearance of Thompson and Flag lakes. The refuge already teems with wildlife, including many species of migrating waterfowl, wading birds, deer, and re-introduced native fish species. (Photo: Courtesy of the author) Fall 2009 | The Confluence | 35 Large river ecosystems are perhaps the most modified systems in The lower Illinois Valley is much older than the upper and has the world, with nearly all of the world’s 79 large river ecosystems been glaciated several times. The Illinoisan ice sheet covered much altered by human activities (Sparks 1995). In North America, of Illinois, stopping 19.9 miles north of the Ohio River. The effects the Illinois River floodplain has been extensively modified and of the glacier are easily seen when comparing the flat agricultural the flood pulse, or annual flood regime, of the river is distorted fields of central and northern Illinois, which the glacier covered, as a result of human activity (Sparks, Nelson, and Yin 1998). to the Shawnee Hills of southern Illinois, where the glacier did Although many view flooding as an unwanted destructive force of not reach.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed
    2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed 2.1 Double Bayou Watershed Overview 2.1.1 Double Bayou landscape The Double Bayou watershed is located on the Upper Texas Gulf Coast and is part of the Galveston Bay watershed (Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed). Situated in the eastern portion of the Lower Galveston Bay, it is comprised of two main subwatersheds: East Fork and West Fork, which are also the primary waterways in the watershed. The Double Bayou watershed drains directly into the Trinity Bay system and ultimately into Galveston Bay. The majority (93%) of the watershed lies within Chambers County, Texas. The remaining 7% of the watershed is located in Liberty County, Texas. The Double Bayou watershed drains 98 square miles (61,445 acres) of predominantly rural and agricultural landscape. However, several residential centers are located in the watershed. Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed 1 The City of Anahuac, Texas is located on the Trinity River and the northeast bank of Trinity Bay. This rural community is the largest contiguous area of developed land in the watershed. Anahuac has a total area of 1,344 acres (2.1 square miles) and is nine feet above sea level (District 2013). Anahuac is the Chambers County seat, with a 2010 population of 2,243. Much of the middle portion of Chambers county drains into Double Bayou. The unincorporated community of Oak Island is identified by the U.S. Census as a designated place. Oak Island is located at the confluence of the East and West Forks of Double Bayou and Trinity Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire in the Southeastern Grasslands, By
    Fire in the Southeastern Grasslands RICHARD J. VOGL Department of Biology California State University Los Angeles, CA 90032 INTRODUCTION ~ERE has been more research on the effects of fire in the southeastern United States than in any region of North America. Most studies have been concerned with the effects of fire on the trees, including the role of fire in controlling hardwood suc­ cession, fire damage to trees, the effects of fire on soils and litter, the influence of fire on conifer growth and reproduction, and the relationships of fire to tree diseases (Garren 1943; Ahlgren and Ahlgren 1960; Cushwa 1968). A lesser, but stilI substantial number of studies have been focused on the effects of fire on forage yields and livestock production (Wahlenberg et al. 1939), and the use of fire in wildlife management in the Southeast. But academic or phy­ tosociological studies of the vegetational composition and of the effects of fire on the understory vegetation are generally lacking. Except for some range and wildlife research and several general studies (Wells and Shunk 1931; Leukel and St<Jkes 1939; Biswell and Lemon 1943; Burton 1944; Lemon 1949, 1967; Campbell 1955; Biswell1958; Hodgkins 1958; Arata 1959; Cushwa et al. 1966, 1970; Wolters 1972) , most investigators have ignored the herbaceous cover or grassland vegetation under southeastern trees. Even early botanists often became more interested in the unusual botanical features such as the southern extent of Appalachian tree species (Harper 1943, 1952), the description of the silaceous dunes of the 175 RICHARD J. VOGL Gulf Coast (Kurz 1942), the habits of eastern red cedar (Harper 1912), the vegetation of the Okefenokee Swamp (Wright and Wright 1932), or why the Black Belt Prairie of Alabama was treeless (Ranking and Davis 1971), thereby neglecting the widespread and common grassland vegetation and its relationship to fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Description of Wetland Types, Complexes, and Mitigation Banks in the Chehalis Basin
    Appendix F Description of Wetland Types, Complexes, and Mitigation Banks in the Chehalis Basin Appendix F Wetland Types Open Water Wetlands The open water cover class includes areas that are primarily composed of deep (greater than 6.6 feet), permanent open water with less than 25% cover by vegetation or exposed soil (Ecology 2013). These areas are not technically considered to be wetlands under the Cowardin system, but rather deepwater habitats (Cowardin et al. 1979). Areas mapped as open water in the Chehalis Basin include the Pacific Ocean, deeper portions of Grays Harbor (including the Grays Harbor Navigation Channel), much of the mainstem Chehalis River, lower portions of many of the larger rivers in the Chehalis Basin (including the Humptulips River, Johns River, Elk River, Hoquiam River, East Hoquiam River, Wishkah River, Wynoochee River, Satsop River, Black River, Newaukum River, Elliot Slough, Grass Creek, and Dempsey Creek), and most lakes, reservoirs, and larger borrow and mine pits in the Chehalis Basin (including Horseshoe Lake, Plummer Lake, Fort Borst Lake, Hayes Lake, Skookumchuck Reservoir, Scott Lake, Deep Lake, Pitman Lake, Black Lake, Moores Lake, Vance Creek Lake, Huttula Lake, Sylvia Lake, Lake Aberdeen, Failor Lake, Wynoochee Lake, Nahwatzel Lake, Lystair Lake, Lake Arrowhead, Stump Lake, and others). The excavated canal system in Ocean Shores, on the Point Brown Peninsula of Grays Harbor, is also classified as open water. Estuarine Wetlands The estuarine wetland type includes tidally influenced wetlands that occur in coastal areas where ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land, and where salinity, due to ocean-derived salts, is equal to or greater than 0.5% (Cowardin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Itinerary
    BIRDING ITINERARY | 2018 | Best Birding on the Upper Beaumont Birder Hotel Texas Gulf Coast Packages for 2018 28 GREAT COASTAL BIRDING TRAILS Beaumont, Texas is along two migratory flyways which brings a Check out our new special birding packages available! wide variety of birds, thanks to its range of habitats. Because of Use the code below to access a special discounted rate PLUS our unique location, visiting Beaumont offers you an experience our new Souvenir Beaumont Birding Book, Trail Maps, Itinerary, unlike anywhere else. Within a 40-mile radius, you will find the AND an exclusive Beaumont Birdie plush featuring its own story wild coastal shore of Sabine Pass and Sea Rim State Park, the and authentic bird call. When booking, use code “BMT” online, meandering bayous of the Anahuac Wildlife Refuge, and the thick or “BMT BIRDING 18” by phone. Birding Packages are available at forests of the Big Thicket and Piney Woods. the Holiday Inn & Suites Beaumont Plaza, (409) 842-5995 and the Hampton Inn, (409) 840-9922. VisitBeaumontTX.com/Birding BOOK YOUR BIRDING HOTEL PACKAGE: VISITBEAUMONTTX.COM/BIRDER 2 Birding Itinerary Day 1 Suggested Itinerary BEAUMONT BOTANICAL GARDENS & CATTAIL MARSH UTC 019 WETLANDS / TYRRELL PARK Tyrrell Park is a multi-use city facility that retains Morning sufficient habitat to support an interesting selection of eastern breeding birds. Perhaps it’s the best spot along the Great Texas Coastal Birding Trails to see Fish Crows and American Crows. Cattail Marsh is part of the City of Beaumont wastewater treatment facilities. With 900 acres of wetlands, Cattail Marsh is a natural address for some of Southeast Texas’s most eye- catching waterfowl.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for Rain Gardens Recommended for Central North Carolina
    Plants for Rain Gardens Recommended for central North Carolina Charlotte Glen, Urban Horticulture Agent, North Carolina Cooperative Extension – New Hanover County Center Soil conditions in rain gardens alternate between wet and dry, making them tough places for many plants to grow. The following plants are adapted to these conditions, though some plants will tolerate more moisture than others. Each plant is marked according to its flooding tolerance, with 3’s being tolerant of longer flooding, 2’s only tolerating brief flooding, and 1’s indicate plants that tolerant extended drought once established. All of these plants are native to the southeastern United States in wetland habitats and most are readily available at local nurseries. Wetland plants can generally grow well in moist or well-drained soils, whereas plants adapted to dry soils rarely survive in soggy conditions. How wet a rain garden stays will vary considerably depending on the site where it is installed. Rain gardens created on sandy soils will rarely hold water for more than a few hours. On these sites it is most important to choose plants for their drought tolerance. Rain gardens created on loamy or silty soils could pond water for 1-2 days (if your site ponds water for more than 3 days, you should consider creating a wetland). On these sites, choosing plants tolerant of extended flooding is critical to success. Remember you are not limited to planting just within the excavated area! Extending plantings around this area will help the rain garden to blend in with the overall landscape. Any plants adapted to the site conditions can be used outside of the excavated area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama
    The Vascular Flora of the Red Hills Forever Wild Tract, Monroe County, Alabama T. Wayne Barger1* and Brian D. Holt1 1Alabama State Lands Division, Natural Heritage Section, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Montgomery, AL 36130 *Correspondence: wayne [email protected] Abstract provides public lands for recreational use along with con- servation of vital habitat. Since its inception, the Forever The Red Hills Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) is a 1785 ha Wild Program, managed by the Alabama Department of property that was acquired in two purchases by the State of Conservation and Natural Resources (AL-DCNR), has pur- Alabama Forever Wild Program in February and Septem- chased approximately 97 500 ha (241 000 acres) of land for ber 2010. The RHFWT is characterized by undulating general recreation, nature preserves, additions to wildlife terrain with steep slopes, loblolly pine plantations, and management areas and state parks. For each Forever Wild mixed hardwood floodplain forests. The property lies tract purchased, a management plan providing guidelines 125 km southwest of Montgomery, AL and is managed by and recommendations for the tract must be in place within the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural a year of acquisition. The 1785 ha (4412 acre) Red Hills Resources with an emphasis on recreational use and habi- Forever Wild Tract (RHFWT) was acquired in two sepa- tat management. An intensive floristic study of this area rate purchases in February and September 2010, in part was conducted from January 2011 through June 2015. A to provide protected habitat for the federally listed Red total of 533 taxa (527 species) from 323 genera and 120 Hills Salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti Highton).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Wildlife Service Boltonla Decurrens(D.Currentfalse
    ~ ~ 559&~ FiIj~ ~ / ~ *~N~1 Thju~u~P%~ 25, 1988 1 Proposed Rules aster~a wet peafrie’ perennial, as a threateneds~~’eeiesinider the authirity of theEhthn!ered Species Actof19~3, as amended. Twelve populations are knownto be extent in five Illinois counties, and two populations, orta of which is divided into two subpopulatkons, are knownin one Missouri county. The plant is believed extirpated from 13 othercounties in Illinois and three counties in Missouri. It is threatened by destruction and modification of the floodplain forest along the Illinois and Mississippi rivers due to wetland drainage and agricultural expansion. Because of extensive row crop cultivation within the watersheds of these rivers, habitat of the decurrent false aster is continually being modified or destroyed by heavy siltation. This proposed rule,ifmade final, will extend the Act’s protection to Boltonia decurrens. Critical habitat is not proposed forthis plant The Service seeks data and comments from the public on this proposed rule. DATES: Comments from all interested parties must be recieved by April 25, 198& P~blichearingrequests must be received by April 11, 1988. ADDRESSES: Comments and materials concerning this proposal should be sent to the Endaegered Species Division, US. Fish and Wlb~ffeService, Federal Building, Fort Snelling. Twin Cites, Minnesata 55111. Comments and materials received will be availabLe for public inspecifon. by appointment, during normal business hours at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT James M. Engel,Endangered.Species Coordinator (see ADDRESSES section) at 612/725—3276 or FRS 725—3276~ SUPN.EMaNTARY INFOR*SATIOIe Background Boitonia decurrens, a member of the Aster family was reeognmed as a disthlct .peciesbyrSchwagman and Nyboer (1985).
    [Show full text]