DOCSLIB.ORG

JOINT LIMPOPO RIVER BASIN STUDY SCOPING PHASE Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOINT LIMPOPO RIVER BASIN STUDY SCOPING PHASE Final REPÚBLICA DE MOÇAMBIQUE MINISTÉRIO DAS OBRAS PUBLICAS E HABITAÇÃO DIRECÇÃO NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS REPÚBLICA DE M I OÇAM UE B Q On behalf of the LIMPOPO BASIN PERMANENT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE - LBPTC JOINT LIMPOPO RIVER BASIN STUDY SCOPING PHASE Final Report Main Report January 2010 Botswana Mozambique South Africa Zimbabwe FINANCED BY Commissioned by: In delegated cooperation with: PREPARED BY BIGCON CONSORTIUM MAIN REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................ii LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 2 THE LIMPOPO RIVER BASIN............................................................................................ 2 2.1 Geography and catchment division ...........................................................................................2 2.2 Topography and climate.............................................................................................................5 2.3 Socio-economic conditions ..........................................................................................................7 2.4 Water use and developed infrastructure...................................................................................7 2.4.1 Water demand ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.4.2 Storage dams and water transfers............................................................................................................ 9 2.4.3 Water demand management.................................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Water resources and water balance.........................................................................................12 2.5.1 River flow characteristics...................................................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 Water balance........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.6 Water quality and environmental status.................................................................................16 2.6.1 Water quality......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.6.2 Environmental flow requirements......................................................................................................... 17 2.6.3 Environmental status............................................................................................................................. 19 2.6.4 Protected areas ...................................................................................................................................... 21 2.7 Legal and institutional setting ..................................................................................................22 3 PROBLEMS TO ADDRESS ................................................................................................ 24 3.1 Opportunities and challenges ...................................................................................................24 3.2 Need for transboundary water resources management.........................................................25 3.3 Choice of appropriate level of detail and scale .......................................................................26 3.4 Sub-basin division......................................................................................................................27 4 DATA AVAILABILITY AND CONSTRAINTS .................................................................. 30 4.1 Previous studies .........................................................................................................................30 4.1.1 What studies are relevant for transboundary water resources management? ........................................ 30 4.1.2 Availability of relevant previous studies............................................................................................... 30 4.2 Maps and GIS ............................................................................................................................34 4.2.1 What geographical information is relevant for transboundary water resources management? ............. 34 4.2.2 Availability of maps and GIS data ........................................................................................................ 35 4.2.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 40 4.2.4 Information gaps and need for harmonisation....................................................................................... 41 4.3 Climatic data..............................................................................................................................41 4.3.1 What climatic information is relevant for transboundary water resources management?..................... 41 4.3.2 Availability of climatic data.................................................................................................................. 42 4.3.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 43 4.3.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 43 4.4 Surface water data and reservoir levels ..................................................................................43 4.4.1 What surface water data is relevant for transboundary water resources management?......................... 43 4.4.2 Availability of runoff data, rating curves and reservoir levels .............................................................. 43 4.4.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 45 4.4.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 45 4.5 Groundwater data and hydrogeological information ............................................................45 4.5.1 What groundwater data is relevant for transboundary water resources management?.......................... 45 4.5.2 Availability of hydrogeological information......................................................................................... 46 4.5.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 46 4.5.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 46 4.6 Water quality and sediment transport ....................................................................................47 4.6.1 What water quality data is relevant for transboundary water resources management?......................... 47 4.6.2 Availability of water quality and sediment data.................................................................................... 47 4.6.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 49 4.6.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 49 4.7 Water demand and use .............................................................................................................50 4.7.1 What water demand data is relevant for transboundary water resources management? ....................... 50 4.7.2 Availability of water demand and use information ............................................................................... 51 4.7.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 51 4.7.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 51 4.8 Socio-economic information .....................................................................................................52 4.8.1 What socio-economic data is relevant for transboundary water resources management?..................... 52 4.8.2 Availability of socio-economic information ......................................................................................... 52 4.8.3 Compatibility between data in the four countries.................................................................................. 53 4.8.4 Data gaps and need for harmonisation .................................................................................................. 53 4.9 Legal and institutional information.........................................................................................53
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the Upper Limpopo River Basin: a Case Study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer
    Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the Upper Limpopo River Basin: A Case Study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer Submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrogeology Submitted by: Simamkele Siyambonga Baqa Student number: 1098513 Supervisors: Dr. Karen Villholth (IWMI) Prof. Tamiru Abiye (Wits) July 2017 in Johannesburg Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the upper Limpopo River Basin: A case study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer Declaration I Simamkele Siyambonga Baqa declare that Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the upper Limpopo River Basin with a case study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer is my own investigation and covers no section copied in whole or in part from any source unless it is clearly acknowledged in quotation marks and with detailed, complete and precise referencing. Further, the report has not been submitted before for any degree or examination at any university. …………………………………….. (Signature) ………………… (Date) I Abstract Hydrogeological research was undertaken in the transboundary Ramotswa dolomitic aquifer to provide understanding and quantification of the processes governing recharge mechanism and rates, in order to promote efficient and sustainable groundwater resource utilization and development, as well as to improve the Ramotswa transboundary aquifer management. Hydrochemical and tracer approaches were utilized to evaluate the processes governing the recharge mechanism while the chloride mass balance approach was further applied to assess groundwater recharge rates. Results indicated that all groundwater samples contained detectable amounts of tritium highlighting the renewability of the transboundary Ramotswa aquifer resources. Two distinct water types were characterised: sub-modern waters approximately recharge prior to the 1950s and a mixture of modern and sub-modern waters of recently recharge rainfall indicative of active recharge in the area through intensive rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Bezhoek Heritage Report
    Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Cultural Heritage Survey of the Farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS, Magisterial District of Middelburg, Mpumalanga For Bezuidenhoutshoek Farm (Pty) Ltd P O Box 1152 Gallo Manor 2052 By Francois P Coetzee Department of Anthropology & Archaeology University of South Africa PO Box 392 Pretoria 0003 Tel: (012) 429 6297 Fax: (012) 429 6091 [email protected] August 2009 Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Terms of Reference 3. Nature of the Proposed Activity or Development 4. Definitions and Approach 5. Methodology 5.1 Maps and Other Sources 5.2 Fieldwork 5.3 Visibility and Constraints 6. Description of Study Area 7. Archaeological Sequence 8. Archaeological Context 8.1 Stone Age 8.2 Iron Age Sequence 8.3 Ethno-historical Context 9. Description of Sites 10. Summary of Sites 11. Rock Art Sites 12. Director-General: Survey Maps 13. Conclusions and Recommendations Bibliography Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Executive Summary This report focuses on the results from a cultural heritage investigation on the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS. The area is characterised by mountainous areas (featuring the Olifants River) as well as open grassland. The area has a rich cultural heritage with Ndebele people living in the area since AD1650 and white farmers settling in the late 19th Century. Iron Age settlements Five Late Iron Age stone-walled settlements were recorded during the survey. These are preliminarily associated with Ndzundza-Ndebele occupation (AD 1650 – AD 1830). Some of these sites are extensive and have substantial archaeological deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River the Role of DWAF in Local Water Management
    Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River The role of DWAF in local water management IWMI Working Paper B.W. Raven, April 2004, Wageningen Acknowledgments The author likes to thank specifically Barbara van Koppen (IWMI) and Jeroen Warner (Wageningen University) for their help and contribution to this case study. The author further thanks: Willy Enright (DWAF Western Cape), Edward Lahiff (Western Cape University), Cees Leeuwis (Wageningen University), Derek Weston and Francois van der Merwe (DWAF Pretoria), Gert Bezuidenhout Johan Du Preez (Lower Blyde River WUA) Francis Mohlala (Mametja / Sekororo communities), Marie Tinka Uys (Environmental issues Blyde River), Gerhard Backeberg (WRC Pretoria), Anthony Turton (AWIRU Pretoria), Herve Levite, Nicholas Faysse, Tebogo Seshoka and other colleagues of IWMI Pretoria. 1 Content 1 Introduction 1.1 Case Study: The Lower Blyde River 1.2 The Case Study in perspective: South Africa and The Netherlands 1.3 Case Study Objectives 2 General Background 2.1 Multi Stakeholder Participation 2.2 Former SA irrigation policy 2.3 The new SA water policy: NWA 1998 2.4 Building CMAs and WUAs 3 The Lower Blyde River 3.1 The Blyde River Catchment 3.2 Stakeholders 3.2.1 Irrigation Farmers 3.2.2 Mametja / Sekororo Communities 3.2.3 Upstream Stakeholders 3.2.4 Downstream Stakeholders 3.2.5 Governments involved 4 Water Management in the Lower Blyde River 4.1 The Lower Blyde WUA 4.2 The Lower Blyde Irrigation Pipeline 4.3 The 800ha Black Emerging Farmers Project 4.4 Domestic Water Supply Mametja / Sekororo communities 5 Conclusions Bibliography Annex: list of interviews 2 1 Introduction “The new South Africa is the world in microcosm, in its population mix, its wealth gap and above all in the impact which the new forces of globalisation are having on it.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 6 - Fisheries Management Framework
    "Strengthening Fisheries Management in ACP Countries" ANNEX 6 - Fisheries Management Framework Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Project ref. N° SA-3.2- B15 Region: Southern Africa Country: Botswana November 2012 Assignment by: Project Funded by the European Union. “This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Prof Ian Cowx on behalf of Landell Mills and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.” “The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views of the concerned governments.” Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Project ref. N° SA-3.2- B15 Name of individual consultant Professor Ian Cowx Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 First draft 3/11/2012 2 Report 22/11/2012 Designed and produced at Landell Mills Ltd Task management & quality assurance by Charlotte Howell This report has been prepared with the financial support of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Landell Mills and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Project Funded by the European Union A project implemented by Landell Mills pg. 2 Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS.......................................................................................................................... 4 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MAJOR DAMS IN BOTSWANA ............................. 8 3. STATUS OF THE FISHERIES IN THE MAJOR DAMS......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Synchronisation and Flood Releases in the Zambezi River Basin Project Annex 4
    Doc No: FR – MR Transboundary Water Management in SADC Transboundary Water Management in SADC DAMDAM SYNCHRONISATION SYNCHRONISATION AND AND FLOOD FLOOD RELEASES RELEASES IN IN THETHE ZAMBEZI ZAMBEZI RIVER RIVER BASIN BASIN PROJECT PROJECT Final Report Executive Summary 31 March 2011 Annex 4 RecommendationsSWRSD Zambezi Basin Jointfor Venture Investments 31 March 2011 SWRSD Zambezi Basin Joint Venture This report is part of the Dam Synchronisation and Flood Releases in the Zambezi River Basin project (2010-2011), which is part of the programme on Transboundary Water Management in SADC. To obtain further information on this project and/or progamme, please contact: Mr. Phera Ramoeli Senior Programme Officer (Water) Directorate of Infrastructure and Services SADC Secretariat Private Bag 0095 Gaborone Botswana Tel: +267 395-1863 Email: [email protected] Mr. Michael Mutale Executive Secretary Interim ZAMCOM Secretariat Private Bag 180 Gaborone Botswana Tel: +267 365-6670 or +267 365-6661/2/3/4 Email: [email protected] DAM SYNCHRONISATION AND FLOOD RELEASES IN THE ZAMBEZI RIVER BASIN: ANNEX 4 OF FINAL REPORT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................................. III LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ VI LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Health Programme in the North West Province
    RIVER HEALTH PROGRAMME IN THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE What is the River Health Programme? ‚ It is a national programme co-ordinated by DWAF, DEAT, WRC designed to monitor the condition of rivers in South Africa using standardised bio- monitoring techniques. What is biomonitoring? ‚ Use of living organisms as biological indicators of ecosystem or environmental “health”. ‚ Animals and plants provide a long-term integrated reflection of water quality and quantity, habitat quality and other environmental conditions What is being monitored in the River Health Programme? Indices of Ecosystem health ‚ Fish (Fish Community Integrity Index) ‚ Aquatic Invertebrates (South African Scoring System SASS4) ‚ Aquatic Habitats (Integrated Habitat Assessment System IHAS) ‚ Plants (Riparian Vegetation Index RVI) ‚ Water flow (Hydrological Index) ‚ Water quality (Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Conductivity, Temperature) ‚ River channel condition (Geomorphological Index) Advantages of biomonitoring ‚ Detects changes in water quality e.g pollution from mining, industry and agriculture ‚ Detects effects of changes in water flow e.g dams, bridges and forestry ‚ Standardized method of comparison of water quality ‚ Easy to use practical means of assessing water quality ‚ Relatively cheap and quick ‚ Can detect water quality changes which may be missed by chemical sampling ‚ Non-destructive - animals returned live to water. Disadvantages to biomonitoring ‚ A fair amount of training is required ‚ Can be open to subjective interpretation ‚ Does not provide an exact figures of water quality parameters ‚ Cannot pinpoint the exact cause of water quality problems ‚ Has no legal standing North West Rivers identified for River Health Programme ‚ Groot Marico River ‚ Hex River near Rustenburg ‚ Elands River near Rustenburg ‚ Crocodile River downstream of Hartebeespoort Dam ‚ Mooi River near Potchefstroom ‚ Schoonspruit near Ventersdorp to Orkney ‚ Harts River from Lichtenburg to Spitzkop Dam ‚ the section of the Vaal River forming the boundary between the Free State and the North West.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterberg District Municipality Wetland Report | 2017
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY WETLAND REPORT | 2017 LOCAL ACTION FOR BIODIVERSITY (LAB): WETLANDS SOUTH AFRICA Biodiversity for Life South African National Biodiversity Institute Full Program Title: Local Action for Biodiversity: Wetland Management in a Changing Climate Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Southern Africa Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-674-A-14-00014 Contractor: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Secretariat Date of Publication: September 2017 Author: R. Fisher DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. FOREWORD It is a great pleasure and honour for me to be part of Catchment. The Nylsvlei is the largest inland floodplain the ICLEI – Local Action for Biodiversity programme wetland system in South Africa. Nylsvlei is within in preservation of the biodiversity, and wetlands in the world renowned UNESCO Waterberg Biosphere particular of the Waterberg District Municipality. On Reserve. The Nylsvlei is our pride in Eco-Tourism, a behalf of the people of Waterberg District Municipality, leisure destination of choice in Limpopo. Nylsvlei I would like to thank ICLEI for choosing the district to Nature Reserve is a 40 square kilometre protected be part of this programme. Tourism and Heritage area, lying on the floodplain of the Nyl River and opens the door to new opportunities, and it is good the uppermost section of the Mogalakwena River. to focus on promoting and protecting our amazing The area has been declared a RAMSAR Wetland site wetlands to domestic and international tourists. Our because of its international biodiversity conservation district seeks to promote and preserve South Africa’s importance that is endemic to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Commitment by the Executive Authority
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT BY THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE MAYOR Cllr P.S. KEKANA According to the Municipal Systems Act, each Municipal amendments made considering the contract we made Council must, within a prescribed period after its elected with the people of Waterberg during the local government term, adopt a single, inclusive strategic plan for the elections. development of the municipality. However, our Predecessor Council already adopted a draft IDP. We, in The tasks given to local government entail more an endeavor to execute our political mandate, followed demanding capabilities and performance. This means that the path laid by them and adopted the draft IDP with we are not only expected to find the means for addressing 1 2008/2009 IDP REVIEW WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY traditional local government challenges of delivering should do so by putting in place targeted support basic services to the people, but we are supposed to find programmes for our women mayors and councillors, and strategies and mechanisms that are potent enough to not rejoice at their failures.The success of the integrated remove the many bottlenecks which stand in the way of development plan as enshrined herein caters also for sustainable development in a local jurisdiction. The IDP development of infrastructure is dependant on the document that we adopted will serve as a blue-print that competencies of Councillors, municipal officials, and will gauge service delivery and timely implementation. service providersInfrastructure is the cornerstone of social upliftment and economic development. In particular, fast The next five years will be fundamentally different tracking Infrastructure delivery will also contribute to the regarding the kind of support that both national and Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa provincial government spheres will be providing to (ASGISA), and also assist in achieving the targeted municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Experiences in the Limpopo River Basin
    intersectorai Management of River Basins Overview of Experiences in the Limpopo River Basin Thomas Schild Team Leader, German Agency for Technical Co-operation (GTZ), Windhoek, Namibia Abstract The paper presents a summary of the findings of a German mission to four countries of Southern Africa, in which many people at different levels were asked to give their views about water issues in two trans-national river basins, the Limpopo and the Orange-Senqu. The principal common factors in people's responses are identified. Various sources and types of inequity are described. In conclusion, it is found that external assistance could be especially useful in areas of information and communication, and in organisational development for river-basin management. 1. Context A mission by a project appraisal team of the German Agency for Technical Co­ operation (GTZ) was carried out in September 2000, for the support of regional water management in the SADC (Southern African Development Community) region. The team talked to stakeholders of the Limpopo and the Orange-Senqu river basins. The mission had the following major tasks; Map the scene; Capture the expectations and issues of concern of the stakeholders with regard to the establishment of river basin commissions; Identify possible areas for technical co-operation; Make preparations for the planning workshop. 2. Procedures Between 14 and 29 September 2000, the group visited Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Botswana and South Africa and held discussions with relevant government institutions, parastatals and donor organisations involved in water resources management of the Limpopo and, where applicable, of the Orange/Senqu. Other resource persons, such as representatives of water users' organisations, researchers, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and consultants were met.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and the Indigenous Communities of South East Zimbabwe, 1934-2008
    Living on the fringes of a protected area: Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and the indigenous communities of South East Zimbabwe, 1934-2008 by Baxter Tavuyanago A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the Department of Historical and Heritage Studies at the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR A. S. MLAMBO July 2016 i © University of Pretoria Abstract This study examines the responses of communities of south-eastern Zimbabwe to their eviction from the Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and their forced settlement in the peripheral areas of the park. The thesis establishes that prior to their eviction, the people had created a utilitarian relationship with their fauna and flora which allowed responsible reaping of the forest’s products. It reveals that the introduction of a people-out conservation mantra forced the affected communities to become poachers, to emigrate from south-eastern Zimbabwe in large numbers to South Africa for greener pastures and, to fervently join militant politics of the 1960s and 1970s. These forms of protests put them at loggerheads with the colonial government. The study reveals that the independence government’s position on the inviolability of the country’s parks put the people and state on yet another level of confrontation as the communities had anticipated the restitution of their ancestral lands. The new government’s attempt to buy their favours by engaging them in a joint wildlife management project called CAMPFIRE only slightly relieved the pain. The land reform programme of the early 2000s, again, enabled them to recover a small part of their old Gonarezhou homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • GROOT LETABA RIVER WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Glewap)
    REPORT NO.: P 02/B810/00/0708/ Volume 2 GROOT LETABA RIVER WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (GLeWaP) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2008 Compiled by: ILISO Consulting (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 68735 Highveld 0169 Tel (012) 665 3602 Fax (012) 665 1886 Contact person: T Baker Groot Letaba River Water Development Project (GLeWaP) i Environmental Impact Assessment LIST OF STUDY REPORTS IN GROOT LETABA RIVER WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (BRIDGING STUDIES) This report forms part of the series of reports, done for the bridging studies phase of the GLeWaP. All reports for the GLeWaP are listed below. Sequential Numbering Annexure Title Authors Volume Report Title Annexure Volume 1Executive Summary Report n/a - Project Coordination Volume 2Main Report n/a - and Management Team Volume 3Record of Implementation Decisions n/a - (BKS) P 02/B810/00/0508 Volume 4 Volume 5 Volume 1Main Report n/a - Annexure 1Nwamitwa Dam: Design Criteria Memorandum Volume 2 Preliminary Design of Nwamitwa Dam Annexure 2Nwamitwa Dam: Dam Type Selection Report Volume 3Preliminary Design of the Raising of Tzaneen Dam n/a - Technical Study Volume 4Bulk Water Distribution Infrastructure n/a - Module Volume 5 (Ninham Shand) P 02/B810/00/0608 Volume 6 Volume 7 Volume 8 Volume 9 Volume 10 Volume 1Scoping Report n/a - Annexure AWater Quality Specialist Study Annexure BTerrestrial Ecology Specialist Study Annexure CSocial Impact Assessment Annexure DEconomic Specialist Study Annexure EPublic Participation Annexure FAir Quality Specialist Study Environmental Impact Assessment Report
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe
    Water quality and sediment transport issues in surface water Proc. IAHS, 377, 57–66, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-377-57-2018 Open Access © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Sedimentation and Its Impacts/Effects on River System and Reservoir Water Quality: case Study of Mazowe Catchment, Zimbabwe Colleta Tundu1, Michael James Tumbare2, and Jean-Marie Kileshye Onema3 1Zimbabwe National Water Authority, P.O. Box Cy617 Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe 2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP167, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe 3WaterNet Secretariat, P.O. Box MP600, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe Correspondence: Colleta Tundu ([email protected]) Received: 7 June 2017 – Accepted: 10 October 2017 – Published: 16 April 2018 Abstract. Sediment delivery into water sources and bodies results in the reduction of water quantity and quality, increasing costs of water purification whilst reducing the available water for various other uses. The paper gives an analysis of sedimentation in one of Zimbabwe’s seven rivers, the Mazowe Catchment, and its impact on water quality. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model was used to compute soil lost from the catchment as a result of soil erosion. The model was used in conjunction with GIS remotely sensed data and limited ground observations. The estimated annual soil loss in the catchment indicates soil loss ranging from 0 to 65 t ha yr−1. Bathymetric survey at Chimhanda Dam showed that the capacity of the dam had reduced by 39 % as a result of sedimentation and the annual sediment deposition into Chimhanda Dam was estimated to be 330 t with a specific yield of 226 t km−2 yr−1.
    [Show full text]