DOCSLIB.ORG

Primatology and Human Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primatology and Human Evolution Primatology and Human Evolution: Anthropology 350 (070:350:01) Spring 2014 Nancy Moinde-Fockler Monday 10:55am - 1:55pm Biological Sciences Building Room 206 Office Hours: 2pm – 3pm and by Appt. Office: Room 001B( basement) Biological Sciences Bldg., Douglass Anthropology Department Phone: 732-932-9886 Contact Info: [email protected] Course Description: This is an upper level Evolutionary Anthropology course that examines both the anatomy and behavior of primates in an attempt to better understand human evolution. In this course we will explore the historical significance of Primatology as the foundation for developing evolutionary models of human behavior. Students will learn about the history and significance of the complex relationship between humans, our closest living relatives and our evolutionary past. Learning Goals: Students will gain specific knowledge on human and primate anatomy and socioecology. They will critically analyze and assess written works by primatologists concerning the utilization of primates in modeling our evolutionary past. Students will access electronic databases to compare and contrast cranial, post-cranial and dental images that they will use to produce written reports summarizing differences in anatomical form and function and the corresponding implications for diet, locomotion and behavior. Students will also complete a Précis of recent Journal articles on a topic from the course. Attendance: Students are expected to attend all classes. If you expect to miss one or two classes, please use the University absence reporting website https://sims.rutgers.edu/ssra to indicate the date and reason for your absence. An e-mail will automatically be sent to me. Required Texts: • Fleagle, John C. 1999. Primate Adaptation and Evolution (2nd Ed.). New York, NY, Academic Press. • Ankel-Simons, F. 2000. An Introduction to Primate Anatomy (2nd Ed.). New York, NY, Academic Press. (Paperback) • de Waal, Frans B. M. (ed.) 2001. Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us About Human Social Evolution . Caimbridge, MA. Harvard University Press. * There will be additional articles assigned throughout the semester. These will be added to the on-line syllabus and made available via the Resource section on the Sakai site for the course. Course Requirements: Your final grade will be calculated as follows: Midterm 30% Final Exam 30% Précis 20% 3 Anatomy Reports (5pt.) 15% Participation 5% Exams: The midterm and final exams will be comprised of a mixture of objective questions (multiple choice, matching), short answer and essays. Review sheets will be disseminated a week before the exam. Participation: Since this is an upper division course and relatively small class, discussion is encouraged and you will be expected to have read the materials and come to class prepared to participate in discussions. Your assessment for Participation will be based on your contribution to “Discussion” activities on the Sakai site as well as in the classroom. I will be posting relevant current events/videos on the Sakai site and invite you to do the same. Précis of Articles: Browse through recent (last 5 years) issues of these journals: • PaleoAnthropology . ( http://www.paleoanthro.org/ - click on the journal link ) • The Journal of Human Evolution * • American Journal of Physical Anthropology* * can be accessed through the Rutgers University Iris computer catalog. Log into the Rutgers system. If not on campus, bring up the Rutgers Library Website, and remotely log into the system. Need either your library barcode and PIN number or Rutgers Web ID and password to log in remotely. Once in system, type the periodical’s name into the Iris search function. • Identify three interesting articles (may be in different issues or journals) that • use non-human primates to address ideas in human evolution • or claim that a particular primate taxon has implications for human evolution • Read and concisely summarize each article • for each article identify • the problem explored • the methodology used in studying the problem • the conclusions that are reached • Why was the problem studied? • If the problem explored has been dealt with before • how does the author(s) justify another treatment? •What impact do the conclusions have for paleoanthropology? • Do the author(s) make a reasonable case for applying the conclusions to human evolution? The précis should begin with detailed information about the papers that you are summarizing—i.e., full paper title, year of publication, journal title, and page numbers. When you quote material, or use additional references, they must be listed in the “References Cited” section that will appear at the end. The text of the précis (not counting citations, introductory material, or References Cited, should be around 5 pages in length , double-spaced. It is due on APRIL 28th . This paper accounts for 20% of the final grade . ALL PRECIS TOPICS MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BEFORE: FEBRUARY 24th How to correctly cite scientific literature in the text: • from a Book Galago inustus has a head plus body length of 16 to 20 cm and tail length of 20-26 cm (Ankel-Simons, 2000). • from a chapter in an edited volume The Pinturas Formation, preserved in the foothills of the Andes of Southern Argentina, is approximately 17.5 - 16.5 million years old (Fleagle and Kay, 1997). • from an article in an Academic Journal "The location of large primates on the neocortex curve where small relative changes in brain size are associated with large relative changes in isocortex size...may explain the multiple facets and rapid rate of human evolution." (Finlay and Darlington, 1995:1583).* * Note that direct quotations must also include the page number How to correctly list References Cited: • from a Book Ankel-Simons, F. 2000. An Introduction to Primate Anatomy (Second Edition) . New York, NY: Academic Press. • from a chapter in an edited volume Fleagle, J. G. and Kay, R.F. 1997. “Platyrrhines, catarrhines, and the fossil record.” Pp. 3-23 in W.G. Kinzey (ed.), New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution and Behavior . Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine DeGruyter. • from an article in an Academic Journal Finlay, B.L. and Darlington, R.B. 1995. Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268:1578-1584. Comparative Primate Anatomy Exercises There are three comparative primate anatomy exercises worth 5% each (15% of total grade). Use textbook and online resources to draw the anatomy of two different species of living primate. Each completed exercise will consist of 2 drawings and a written report. Write a short (1-2 page) summary contrasting the anatomy and behavior of your selected species. This is not an art class; so don’t worry about the artistic quality of your drawings. However, they must be clear and detailed enough to illustrate major anatomical features. Include a scale with your drawings, so that body size can be known. Use textbooks and online resources to learn about the diet, activity-patterns, special senses, and locomotion of the species that you draw. 1) Diet and Dentition •DUE MARCH 3rd • draw teeth and describe diets • use MorphoBrowser database • maintained by the University of Helsinki Biocenter. • http://morphobrowser.biocenter.helsinki.fi •Organisms are grouped taxonomically • look for the primate section • also use eSkeletons ( http://www.eskeletons.org) (see below) 2) Craniofacial Anatomy and Senses • DUE MARCH 24th • draw the skull and describe senses and behavior •use DigiMorph database of high resolution CT scans • subsidized by the NSF • http://digimorph.org • Organisms are grouped taxonomically • look for the primate section 3) Postcranial Anatomy and Locomotion • DUE APRIL 7th • draw postcranial anatomy and describe locomotion • eSkeletons Project Website • maintained by the University of Texas, subsidized by the NSF • http://www.eskeletons.org • Humans and 11 species of non-human primates • allows for the simultaneous comparison of bones • from two species and different views of the same bone COURSE OUTLINE AND READING SCHEDULE: Date Topic Assigned Reading JANUARY Monday • Introduction to the Primate Order Ankel-Simons 1 1/27 • Adaptation, Evolution & Systematics Fleagle 1, Ankel-Simons 2 FEBRUARY Monday • Primatology & Human Evolution Ankel-Simons 3; Tree Intro 2/3 • Prosimians Fleagle 4; Ankel-Simons 4 Monday •New World Monkeys Fleagle 5; Ankel-Simons 4 2/10 •Old World Monkeys Fleagle 6; Ankel-Simons 4 Monday •Apes & Humans Fleagle 7; Ankel-Simons 4 2/17 •Apes & Humans (cont.) Fleagle 7 Monday • Primate Adaptations Fleagle 9 2/24 •Dentition & Diet Ankel-Simons 7; ***PRECIS TOPICS DUE*** Fleagle pp.12-18; 291-297 MARCH Monday • Skull & Sense Organs Ankel-Simons 5, 9; Fleagle pp.23-27 3/3 • Postcrania & Locomotion Ankel-Simons 8; Fleagle 297-306 *** Dental Anatomy Comparison Due*** Monday • Brain & the Senses Ankel-Simons 6, Fleagle pp.19-26 3/10 • Anatomy, Sex & Social Structure Ankel-Simons 11; Fleagle 306-309 Monday SPRING BREAK 3/17 Monday MIDTERM EXAM 3/24 *** Skull & Senses Anatomy Comparison Due*** Monday • Primate Lives Fleagle 3 3/31 • Primate Communities Fleagle 8 APRIL Monday • Social Organization and Reproduction Tree 1 - Pusey 4/7 • Bonobos as Models Tree 2 – deWaal *** Postcrania Anatomy Comparison Due*** Monday • Beyond the Apes Tree 3 - Strier 4/14 • Meat and Human Evolution Tree 4 - Stanford Monday • Diet and Evolution Tree 5 - Wrangham 4/21 • Primate Intelligence Tree 6 - Byrne Monday • Group Size and the Evolution of Intelligence Tree 7 - Dunbar 4/28 • Primate Communication & Human Language Tree 8 – Snowdon *** PRECIS DUE**** MAY Monday • Nature of Culture Tree 9 - McGrew 5/5 • Review for Final Exam FINAL EXAM MONDAY MAY 12 th 8:30 – 11:30 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order Representations + a Rich Memetic Substrate
    Language Needs A 2nd Order Representations + A Rich Memetic Substrate Joanna J. Bryson ([email protected]) Artificial models of natural Intelligence (AmonI) Group, University of Bath, England, UK Recent research has shown that human semantics can be 2nd-ord. soc. rep. no 2nd-ord reps replicated by surprisingly simple statistical algorithms for vocal imit. people birds memorizing the context in which words occur (McDonald no voc. imit. other primates most animals and Lowe, 1998; Landauer and Dumais, 1997). Assum- ing one accepts the point that semantics is the way that the word is used (which cannot be argued in one page, but see Figure 1: Human-like cultural evolution might require both Wittgenstein (1958) or Quine (1960), and which is the un- a rich memetic substrate as provided by vocal imitation, and derlying assumption of memetics) then why wouldn’t more the capacity for second order social representations. species have supported the evolution of this useful system of rapidly evolving cultural intelligence? Recent work in primatology tells us three relevant facts. might have evolved a sign language as rich as our vocal one. First, we know that apes and even monkeys do have cul- However, if I am correct, and the trick is that the richness of ture (de Waal and Johanowicz, 1993; Whiten et al., 1999). the substrate representing the strictly semantic, ungrounded That is, behavior is reliably and consistently transmitted be- cultural transmission is the key, then we now have an ex- tween individuals by non-genetic means. So we know that planation for why other primates don’t share our level of the question is not “why doesn’t animal culture exist”, but culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion
    EMR0010.1177/1754073920930791Emotion ReviewBryant 930791research-article2020 SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION IN THE VOICE Emotion Review Vol. 13, No. 1 (January 2021) 25 –33 © The Author(s) 2020 ISSN 1754-0739 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073920930791 10.1177/1754073920930791 The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion https://journals.sagepub.com/home/emr Gregory A. Bryant Department of Communication, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, USA Abstract Vocal affect is a subcomponent of emotion programs that coordinate a variety of physiological and psychological systems. Emotional vocalizations comprise a suite of vocal behaviors shaped by evolution to solve adaptive social communication problems. The acoustic forms of vocal emotions are often explicable with reference to the communicative functions they serve. An adaptationist approach to vocal emotions requires that we distinguish between evolved signals and byproduct cues, and understand vocal affect as a collection of multiple strategic communicative systems subject to the evolutionary dynamics described by signaling theory. We should expect variability across disparate societies in vocal emotion according to culturally evolved pragmatic rules, and universals in vocal production and perception to the extent that form–function relationships are present. Keywords emotion, evolution, signaling, vocal affect Emotional communication is central to social life for many ani- 2001; Pisanski, Cartei, McGettigan, Raine, & Reby, 2016; mals. Beginning with Darwin
    [Show full text]
  • Oxytocin Is a Nonapeptide Involved in a Wide Range of Physiologic OXT Activity Depends on Adequate Interaction with Its Unique and Behavioral Functions
    Evolutionary pattern in the OXT-OXTR system in primates: Coevolution and positive selection footprints Pedro Vargas-Pinillaa,1, Vanessa Rodrigues Paixão-Côrtesa,1, Pamela Paréa, Luciana Tovo-Rodriguesa, Carlos Meton de Alencar Gadelha Vieiraa, Agatha Xaviera, David Comasb, Alcides Pissinattic, Marialva Sinigagliaa, Maurício Menegatti Rigoa, Gustavo Fioravanti Vieiraa, Aldo B. Luciond, Francisco Mauro Salzanoa,2, and Maria Cátira Bortolinia,2 aDepartamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; bInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; cCentro de Primatologia do Rio de Janeiro, 20940-200 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; and dDepartamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 90050-170 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Contributed by Francisco Mauro Salzano, November 26, 2014 (sent for review July 11, 2014; reviewed by Guido Barbujani and Rafal Slusarz) Oxytocin is a nonapeptide involved in a wide range of physiologic OXT activity depends on adequate interaction with its unique and behavioral functions. Until recently, it was believed that an receptor, OXTR, although it can also bind to the vasopressin unmodified oxytocin sequence was present in all placental mam- receptors (AVPR1a, AVPR1b, and AVPR2) with lower affinity mals. This study analyzed oxytocin (OXT) in 29 primate species and (11–13). Similar to other receptors that use G proteins as OXTR the oxytocin receptor ( ) in 21 of these species. We report transducer signals across the cell membranes, OXTR is com- here three novel OXT forms in the New World monkeys, as well posed of seven transmembrane (TM1–TM7), four extracellular as a more extensive distribution of a previously described variant (N-terminal tail-ECL3), and four intracellular (ICL1-C-terminal (Leu8Pro).
    [Show full text]
  • Primatology & Human Evolution
    Anthropology 350 syllabus p. 1 Primatology & Human Evolution S. Cachel Anthropology 350 (070:350:01) Spring, 2018 This sylabus can be downloaded from the from the class Sakai site, accessible via the Rutgers Sakai portal (http://sakai.rutgers.edu/portal). Course Venue: Monday, Wednesday, 2:15-3:35 P.M. Hickmann 130, Douglass Campus Instructor: Susan Cachel Office: Room 203C, Biological Sciences Building, Douglass Campus. Use the left staircase to the second floor; my office is in the complex of offices immediately to the right of the stairwell. Office phone: 848-932-9270 848-932-9886 (departmental office) email: [email protected] Office Hours (Spring Semester): Monday, 12-2 P.M., or by appointment Required Texts: Shea, J.J. 2017. Stone Tools in Human Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tuttle, R.H. 2014. Apes and Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. The textbooks are on order from the University Bookstore, Somerset Street and College Avenue, in downtown New Brunswick. Pdf files of other class readings will be posted on the class Sakai site under “Resources.” Course Description: This is a course in physical anthropology that deals with the history of primatology and paleoanthropology. It integrates knowledge of the anatomy and behavior of non-human primates with knowledge of human anatomy and behavior. It also uses comparative animal behavior to deal with general questions about how behavior evolves, as well as specific questions about the origins of intelligence and technology. The course also uses archaeological evidence and mammal and primate models to examine the origins of complex sociality.
    [Show full text]
  • MARGARET A. H. BRYER Curriculum Vitae
    MARGARET A. H. BRYER Curriculum Vitae Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Psychology Carnegie Mellon University Email: [email protected] or [email protected] EDUCATION 2020 Ph.D. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York Anthropology Program Dissertation: Nutritional strategy and social environment in redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius) Committee: Jessica Rothman (advisor), Larissa Swedell, Andrea Baden, Marina Cords, David Raubenheimer 2016 M.Phil. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York Anthropology Program 2012 M.A. Hunter College of the City University of New York Department of Anthropology Thesis: Redtail monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius) spatial patterns and insectivory in Uganda Thesis advisor: Jessica Rothman 2007 B.A. Columbia University, New York, NY Department of History Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology PUBLICATIONS Rothman JM and Bryer MAH. (2019) The effects of humans on primate nutritional landscapes: A review. In: Behie A, Teichroeb J, Malone N, eds. Primate Research and Conservation in the Anthropocene. Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology, 82, 199. Bryer MAH, Chapman CA, Raubenheimer D, Lambert JE, and JM Rothman. (2015) Macronutrient and energy contributions of insects to the diet of a frugivorous monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius). International Journal of Primatology, 36:839-854. Rothman JM, Raubenheimer D, Bryer MAH, Takahashi M and CC Gilbert. (2014) Nutritional contributions of insects to primate diets: implications for primate evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 71: 59-69. Rothman JM, Nkurunungi JB, Shannon B and MAH Bryer. (2014) High altitude diets: implications for the feeding and nutritional ecology of mountain gorillas. In: Gursky S, Grow, N, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Origins of Kinship Structures
    THE EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS OF KINSHIP STRUCTURES Bernard Chapais Department of Anthropology University of Montreal Montreal, Quebec CANADA [email protected] Patrilineal kinship structures are among the most complex manifestations of the impact of kinship on human social life. Despite the fact that such structures take highly diverse forms across cultures, that they are absent in many human societies and, moreover, that they are not observed in other primate species, a comparative analysis of human and nonhuman primate societies reveals that human kinship structures have deep evolutionary roots and clear biological underpinnings. I argue here that the first patrilineal kinship structures came into being as the emergent products of the combination, in the course of human evolution, of ten biologically grounded components, seven of which are observed in our closest relative, the chimpanzee, the remaining three being consequences of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans. This indicates that contemporary patrilineal kinship structures are not cultural creations, but cultural constructs that built upon, and diversified from a rich biological substrate. The same reasoning applies to many other complex human kinship phenomena, such as marital arrangements. I conclude that models and theories from cultural anthropology must be compatible with the relevant biological evidence. Introduction There seems to be a growing appraisal by cultural anthropologists that some of the most basic kinship features that humans share with other primates, such as kin groups, kin recognition, the tendency to favor one’s kin, incest avoidance, and many others, reflect our common evolutionary history and biological heritage with those species (e.g., Gode- lier 2004; Jones 2004, 2010; Hill et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expressive Apes and the Emotional Apes
    Gaspar, J Primatol 2012, 1:2 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-6801.1000e113 Primatology EditorialResearch Article OpenOpen Access Access The Expressive Apes and the Emotional Apes: Current Fair Trends in Primatology Augusta Gaspar* Department of Psychology, ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon Portugal and CIS-IUL- Centre for Psychological research and Intervention, ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal Once, not so long ago - lets go back two decades - Primatology In the early 2000’s personality was being reported as affecting was a much more rigid discipline, in which the studies of nonhuman many classes of ape behavior, including facial expression, which primate facial expression and emotion were bound to connect both varied extensively, not only according to group/population, but also topics in the form of (stereotyped displays) which researchers actively across individuals of the same age-class and sex [16-18]. Overall, sought in their behavior sampling schemes. There was little room for the facial behavior of great apes has revealed to be prolific, and interindividual variation, cultural variation and complex emotions, emotionwise chimpanzees display a collection of facial expressions which were «naturally» in the realm of humans. In recent years not that is by no means shorter than that of humans, including varieties only has there been an upsurge of interest in nonhuman primate in the types of smile across apparent subtleties in emotion context expressive behavior, including facial and gestural expression, but also [16-18]. Gestures, too, vary among individuals [19]. Furthermore, an increased interest in the detailed inspection of complex emotional like humans, chimpanzees and gorillas show evidence of control over experiences, such as empathy and social emotions, and a widespread their expression [7,12,17,20,21].
    [Show full text]
  • E.O. Wilson and B.F. Skinner a Dialogue Between Sociobiology and Radical Behaviorism
    springer.com Life Sciences : Evolutionary Biology Naour, Paul E.O. Wilson and B.F. Skinner A Dialogue Between Sociobiology and Radical Behaviorism The book utilizes an unpublished conversation between B.F. Skinner and E.O. Wilson in 1987 as a springboard to lead readers to a more integrated view of behaviorism and sociobiology Reviewers have characterized Paul Naour's A Dialogue Between Sociobiology and Radical Behaviorism, which includes brief introductions by E.O. Wilson and B.F. Skinner's elder daughter, Julie Vargus, as an idea book. The work will undoubtedly have a significant academic market and provide students and scholars in biology, ethology, psychology, anthropology, sociology and economics a strong foundation in twentieth century history and systems. Praise for A Dialogue Between Sociobiology and Radical Behaviorism: - E.O. Wilson says of the book: ". excellent, an outstanding addition to the history of ideas. It will put Fred Skinner back in the pantheon and, providing context, serve as an excellent introduction to the content and central truths in radical behaviorism. Needless to say, I'm also grateful to have my work following Sociobiology Springer given proper attention." -David Sloan Wilson, author of Darwin’s Cathedral writes: "E.O. Wilson 2009, XIX, 138 p. 25 illus. and B.F. Skinner agreed that the human capacity for change is both a product of genetic 1st evolution and an evolutionary process in its own right. Yet, the paradigms of sociobiology and edition radical behaviorism went in very different directions. Paul Naour's insightful analysis of a taped conversation between Wilson and Skinner goes beyond the historical significance of the conversation and helps to integrate the two paradigms for the future." -Carl Haywood writes: Printed book "The present question is whether evolution by natural selection is a useful set of concepts for Hardcover the development of psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberating Primatology
    J Biosci Vol. 43, No. 1, March 2018, pp. 3–8 Ó Indian Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1007/s12038-017-9724-3 Commentary Liberating primatology Published online: 5 January 2018 The study of nonhuman primates developed separately from that of other organisms. –Alison Richard, 1981 Among the many zoologies that have emerged over the last hundred years or so, primatology is astonishing in its reach and breadth of influence on other sciences and people’s thoughts. It is noteworthy for the cultural imprint it carries and the forceful reactions its practice engenders. Primatology is also a contested site for various disciplines and epistemologies. In addition, the field is remarkably place-specific in ways that are often unnoticed. We argue that a mainstream recognition of primatology’s diversity and the various ways in which culture impacts the practice of this science can help to liberate the field from attempts to impose particular methodologies, outlooks and theoretical frameworks on the discipline, and enable the field to make even greater contributions to human understanding. Primatology, or the study of nonhuman primates, occupies a unique place among the biological sciences. ‘A half-breed discipline’ as Whitten (1988) so aptly put it, it gathers within its fold a number of areas of study (ranging from morphology and molecular biology to behavioural psychology and animal studies) that spill over disciplinary boundaries in the approaches and techniques they employ. For example, studies on primate cognition and social behaviour routinely borrow theoretical paradigms from social psychology, research on monkey epidemiology is largely fuelled by human health con- cerns, and investigations into human–primate conflict interactions wield ethnography as a tool that permits a more in-depth understanding of the interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Primate Psychology D Maestripieri, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
    Comparative Primate Psychology D Maestripieri, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA ã 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Glossary Homologous traits Similar traits possessed by Adaptation A genetically controlled trait that has evolved by different species as a result of inheritance from a common natural selection. ancestor. Analogous traits Similar traits that evolved independently Phylogeny The evolutionary development and in different species in response to similar environmental history of a species or higher taxonomic grouping of pressures. organisms. Comparative psychology The study of mind and behavior Primatology The discipline that studies nonhuman in nonhuman animals. primates. Convergent evolution The process by which natural Trait A morphological, physiological, or behavioral selection produces similar adaptations in different species characteristic of an organism. that live in similar environments. Evolutionary Foundations of Comparative related behavior in human beings” (pp. 311–312). Evolutionary Primate Psychology arguments do not figure prominently in comparative research conducted with the animal model approach. Particular organ- Psychology is the discipline that studies mind and behavior. isms are selected mainly on the basis of practical criteria, such as Within psychology, there are many subfields including, among they are small and cheap to maintain in the laboratory, they others, biological, clinical, cognitive, comparative, develop- reproduce frequently, and it is easier to conduct experimental mental, educational, evolutionary, industrial/organizational, studies that may require highly invasive procedures. The most personality and individual differences, and social psychology. common organisms that fit these criteria and are used in com- Some of these subfields are often recognized as independent parative psychological research include fruit flies, cockroaches, disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology Activity, Grade 11
    Anthropology Activity, Grade 11 Anthropology for for Grade 11 Students at the Toronto Zoo PAGE 1 Anthropology Activity, Grade 11 Curriculum Connections Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology, Grade 11, University/College Preparation (HSP3M) Self and Others Foundations of Anthropological, Psychological, and Sociological Thought • demonstrate an understanding of the major questions related to “self and others” that are posed by anthropologists (e.g., What are the cultural patterns that help to define the self?), Forces That Influence and Shape Behaviour • identify and assess the major influences that contribute to an individual’s personal and social development (e.g., heredity, environment, race, gender); • explain why behaviour varies depending on context and on the individuals involved (e.g., at work, within a family, in sports, in a crowd, in a large city or small town). Research and Inquiry Skills Overall Expectations • use appropriate social science research methods effectively and ethically; • effectively communicate the results of their inquiries. Understanding the Foundations of Inquiry in Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology • correctly use the terminology of anthropology, psychology, and sociology (e.g., functionalism, behaviouralism, feminism ); • define the concepts that are central to anthropology (e.g., evolution, diffusion, culture); Using Research Skills • describe the steps involved in social science research and inquiry, including developing and testing a hypothesis; • demonstrate an understanding of various research methodologies for conducting primary research (e.g., interviews, surveys and questionnaires, observations); demonstrate an ability to locate and select relevant information from a variety of print and electronic sources (e.g., books, periodicals, television, Internet sites, CD-ROMs); • evaluate the relevance and validity of information gathered through research; • demonstrate an ability to organize, interpret, and analyse information gathered from a variety of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Kathryn Lasky Author of One Beetle Too Many the Extraordinary Adventures of C Harles Darwin
    a conversation with Kathryn Lasky author of One Beetle Too Many The Extraordinary Adventures of C harles Darwin HC: 978-0-7636-6842-6 • PB: 978-0-7636-6843-3 Ages 7–12 CandlewiCk Press How did you become interested in Darwin, How did you go about researching the book? and what made you choose him as the subject I read all that I could. I audited classes at Harvard, of a picture book? which is near my house in Cambridge, given by I found Darwin a daring man, and yet he was very some famous evolutionary biologists such as the late shy; he was curious but somewhat withdrawn. Stephen Jay Gould and paleoanthropologists such as The combination of these seemingly conflicting David Pilbeam. I even attended the lab sessions to personality traits intrigued me. But what really look at bones and tried to understand the similarities fascinated me was his passion for truth, which led and differences between early hominid skulls and him to explore one simple truth: that nothing living primate skulls. I took a course in primatology. has remained the same or looks the way it has always looked. Species are not fixed and immutable. Species were not created all at once, forever and always, The book explains Darwin’s theory of evolution and but have been evolving and changing over immense the debate between creationism and evolution very periods of time. So dogs have not always been dogs, clearly. Was it difficult to condense these complex nor have birds always been birds or roses roses, and topics into the story and style of a picture book? most astounding to everyone and upsetting to many Oh, yes! I had done a book some years before called was the notion that humans have not always been Traces of Life: The Origins of Humankind, which humans.
    [Show full text]