The Crucible and Other Witch Hunts Webquest Description: The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Crucible and Other Witch Hunts WebQuest Description: The Crucible is a play about deception, fear, and lust, and how these things can enrapture an entire society. Based on a true and awful story, Arthur Miller takes us through witch hunts that parallel his own situation as well as ours. INTRODUCTION This WebQuest will help you gain a better understanding of The Crucible. Miller wrote the play in response to McCarthy's witch hunts of the 1950s. In order to do so, he had to learn about 1692 Salem and what really happened. From there he took "artistic liberties" in dramatizing some situations to create a better piece of literature. You will research what Miller went through in the McCarthy era and discover the differences between what you will read in The Crucible and what happened in 1692 Salem. TASKS In order to complete this WebQuest, you will need to research the following areas and answer the questions in each section: • History of Witchcraft • 1692 Salem and The Crucible • McCarthyism After compiling information on these events, we will reflect on them as we read The Crucible and find out what similar situations/prevailing thoughts may have caused all of them. Before beginning your WebQuest (or witch hunt), each student should follow the link below to try to get a feel for what the witch hunts were like. Remember, the term "witch hunt" is not just about hunting "witches." First, it begs the question of whether witches really exist. If they do not exist, how fruitful can a witch hunt be? Who or what are people searching for? Is it possible that we’re willing to accuse anyone of being a “witch,” if it makes the hunt successful? After being dragged into a vain endeavor, how far would you go to save your reputation or try to prove you are right? Put yourself on trial using this website to feel the futility. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/interactive/salem-interactive/ Now that you have been felt the scrutiny, research the underlying ideas that seem to be prevalent in some of the most famous witch hunts. PROCESS In order to fully understand the history behind The Crucible, you will first need to gather some information. In In groups of three or four, you need to divvy up the research*. Once you have completed your part of the research, you will bring your findings back to the group and discuss. As a group, you can discuss possible answers for the questions in each section Then you can complete the final questions which compare the situations. Each member of the group will answer the questions in his/her own daybook. You do not need to write in complete sentences. If the links do not work, try copying and pasting them into your browser's address bar. *I recommend that you look at each link before assigning the research. Some are very short; others are very long. History of Witchcraft History of witches https://www.history.com/topics/folklore/history-of-witches A Brief History of Witches https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/history-witches-facts-burned-hanged/ Medieval Churches https://www.history.com/news/how-medieval-churches-used-witch-hunts-to-gain-more-followers 1. What was the role of the church in witch trials outside of the U.S? 2. What were the signs/tests for witchcraft? 3. Why were women considered to be more vulnerable to the devil’s persuasion? 4. What are the conflicting understandings of what makes a witch a witch? 5. What does the Bible say about witches? How would this influence the Puritans of Massachusetts? 1692 Salem & The Crucible Fact vs. Fiction http://www.17thc.us/docs/fact-fiction.shtml Salem Village/Salem Town https://sites.google.com/a/uconn.edu/csp12003/home/salem-village-vs-salem-town-theory History of Salem Trials https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/a-brief-history-of-the-salem-witch-trials-175162489/ The Last of the Witch-Trial Hangings http://time.com/3398176/salem-witch-trials/ Spectral evidence https://salemwitchmuseum.com/2013/02/15/spectral-evidence/ Questions: 1. What are 5 major changes that Miller made in The Crucible? 2. Why do you think he changed these things? How might it enhance the plot? 3. Do you think the play would have been as popular if he didn't take these artistic liberties? 4. How does the story of Martha and Giles Cor[e]y illustrate how easy it was to be labeled a witch? 5. What is spectral evidence: and how does one fight it? 6. What are some of the theories surrounding the cause of the Salem witch trials? 7. What do you think was the major cause of the Salem witch trials? Why? 8. How many people lost their lives? How many were guilty? How do you think the trials impacted life for the survivors? 9. How do you think the Salem witch trials could have been avoided? McCarthyism What Is McCarthyism? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N35IugBYH04 McCarthy Bio https://www.biography.com/people/joseph-mccarthy-9390801 Legacy of McCarthyism http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/mccarthy/schrecker6.htm Blacklist (first five paragraphs) http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/mccarthy/blacklist.html Arthur Miller http://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/arthur-miller-elia-kazan-and-the-blacklist-none-without-sin-why- arthur-miller-wrote-the-crucible/5911/ 1. What events and accusations started the hysteria that led up to McCarthyism? 2. What are some examples of discrimination during the accusations, and to what degree do you think discrimination was a cause of the hysteria? 3. What do you think was the major cause of what McCarthy did? 4. How did it affect the lives of the accused, particularly those in Hollywood? 5. How did the general public react to accusations of communism? 6. How does the climate of this era compare/contrast to today? .
Recommended publications
  • Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis

    Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis

    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master’s Thesis “Paranoia in Tony Kushner’s Angels in America and ​ ​ Arthur Miller’s The Crucible” ​ ​ verfasst von / submitted by Dott. Marta Palandri angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien 2018 / Vienna 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 844 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Anglophone Literatures and Cultures degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Alexandra GANSER Table of Contents Introduction 3 Methodology 5 The Plays: Angels in America and The Crucible 6 ​ ​ ​ Arthur Miller’s The Crucible in Context 6 ​ ​ Tony Kushner’s Angels in America in Context 9 ​ ​ Theory 11 New Historicism 11 The Fear of the Other 12 Binary Oppositions 13 Analysis and Theory Application 14 How Does Paranoia Affect Culture? 14 Paranoia and Identity 14 Paranoia and Fear 15 Paranoia in Postwar America 16 Mass Hysteria, Witch Hunts, and Scapegoating in The Crucible 18 ​ A Dual Historical Context 18 Scapegoating 25 Monsters 30 The Role of Guilt 32 The Myth of Witchcraft 34 Conclusion 35 Psychosis, Symbolism, and Apocalypse in Angels in America 36 ​ Historical Context through the Eyes of the Other 36 The Approach of the Millennium 37 Apocalyptic Narratives 41 Binary Oppositions 42 Symbolism and Apocalyptic Visions 44 Psychosis 46 Apocalyptic Otherness 47 Change and Stasis
  • The 200 Plays That Every Theatre Major Should Read

    The 200 Plays That Every Theatre Major Should Read

    The 200 Plays That Every Theatre Major Should Read Aeschylus The Persians (472 BC) McCullers A Member of the Wedding The Orestia (458 BC) (1946) Prometheus Bound (456 BC) Miller Death of a Salesman (1949) Sophocles Antigone (442 BC) The Crucible (1953) Oedipus Rex (426 BC) A View From the Bridge (1955) Oedipus at Colonus (406 BC) The Price (1968) Euripdes Medea (431 BC) Ionesco The Bald Soprano (1950) Electra (417 BC) Rhinoceros (1960) The Trojan Women (415 BC) Inge Picnic (1953) The Bacchae (408 BC) Bus Stop (1955) Aristophanes The Birds (414 BC) Beckett Waiting for Godot (1953) Lysistrata (412 BC) Endgame (1957) The Frogs (405 BC) Osborne Look Back in Anger (1956) Plautus The Twin Menaechmi (195 BC) Frings Look Homeward Angel (1957) Terence The Brothers (160 BC) Pinter The Birthday Party (1958) Anonymous The Wakefield Creation The Homecoming (1965) (1350-1450) Hansberry A Raisin in the Sun (1959) Anonymous The Second Shepherd’s Play Weiss Marat/Sade (1959) (1350- 1450) Albee Zoo Story (1960 ) Anonymous Everyman (1500) Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf Machiavelli The Mandrake (1520) (1962) Udall Ralph Roister Doister Three Tall Women (1994) (1550-1553) Bolt A Man for All Seasons (1960) Stevenson Gammer Gurton’s Needle Orton What the Butler Saw (1969) (1552-1563) Marcus The Killing of Sister George Kyd The Spanish Tragedy (1586) (1965) Shakespeare Entire Collection of Plays Simon The Odd Couple (1965) Marlowe Dr. Faustus (1588) Brighton Beach Memoirs (1984 Jonson Volpone (1606) Biloxi Blues (1985) The Alchemist (1610) Broadway Bound (1986)
  • Undergraduate Play Reading List

    Undergraduate Play Reading List

    UND E R G R A DU A T E PL A Y R E A DIN G L ISTS ± MSU D EPT. O F T H E A T R E (Approved 2/2010) List I ± plays with which theatre major M E DI E V A L students should be familiar when they Everyman enter MSU Second 6KHSKHUGV¶ Play Hansberry, Lorraine A Raisin in the Sun R E N A ISSA N C E Ibsen, Henrik Calderón, Pedro $'ROO¶V+RXVH Life is a Dream Miller, Arthur de Vega, Lope Death of a Salesman Fuenteovejuna Shakespeare Goldoni, Carlo Macbeth The Servant of Two Masters Romeo & Juliet Marlowe, Christopher A Midsummer Night's Dream Dr. Faustus (1604) Hamlet Shakespeare Sophocles Julius Caesar Oedipus Rex The Merchant of Venice Wilder, Thorton Othello Our Town Williams, Tennessee R EST O R A T I O N & N E O-C L ASSI C A L The Glass Menagerie T H E A T R E Behn, Aphra The Rover List II ± Plays with which Theatre Major Congreve, Richard Students should be Familiar by The Way of the World G raduation Goldsmith, Oliver She Stoops to Conquer Moliere C L ASSI C A L T H E A T R E Tartuffe Aeschylus The Misanthrope Agamemnon Sheridan, Richard Aristophanes The Rivals Lysistrata Euripides NIN E T E E N T H C E N T UR Y Medea Ibsen, Henrik Seneca Hedda Gabler Thyestes Jarry, Alfred Sophocles Ubu Roi Antigone Strindberg, August Miss Julie NIN E T E E N T H C E N T UR Y (C O N T.) Sartre, Jean Shaw, George Bernard No Exit Pygmalion Major Barbara 20T H C E N T UR Y ± M ID C E N T UR Y 0UV:DUUHQ¶V3rofession Albee, Edward Stone, John Augustus The Zoo Story Metamora :KR¶V$IUDLGRI9LUJLQLD:RROI" Beckett, Samuel E A R L Y 20T H C E N T UR Y Waiting for Godot Glaspell, Susan Endgame The Verge Genet Jean The Verge Treadwell, Sophie The Maids Machinal Ionesco, Eugene Chekhov, Anton The Bald Soprano The Cherry Orchard Miller, Arthur Coward, Noel The Crucible Blithe Spirit All My Sons Feydeau, Georges Williams, Tennessee A Flea in her Ear A Streetcar Named Desire Synge, J.M.
  • Spectral Evidence’ in Longfellow, Miller and Trump

    Spectral Evidence’ in Longfellow, Miller and Trump

    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses May 2021 Weaponizing Faith: ‘Spectral Evidence’ in Longfellow, Miller and Trump Paul Hyde Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Hyde, Paul, "Weaponizing Faith: ‘Spectral Evidence’ in Longfellow, Miller and Trump" (2021). All Theses. 3560. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/3560 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEAPONIZING FAITH: “SPECTRAL EVIDENCE” IN LONGFELLOW, MILLER AND TRUMP A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts English by Paul Hyde May 2021 Accepted by: Dr. Michael LeMahieu, Committee Chair Dr. Cameron Bushnell Dr. Jonathan Beecher Field ABSTRACT This thesis explores a particular type of irrational pattern-seeking — specifically, “spectral evidence” — in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s Giles Corey of the Salem Farms (1872) and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953). It concludes with observations of this concept’s continued and concerning presence by other names in Trump-era politics. The two works by Longfellow and Miller make a natural pairing because both are plays inspired by the Salem witchcraft trials (1692-93), a notorious historical miscarriage of justice. Robert Warshow calls the Salem witchcraft trials, aside from slavery, “the most disconcerting single episode in our history: the occurrence of the unthinkable on American soil, and in what our schools have rather successfully taught us to think of as the very ‘cradle of Americanism” (211).
  • The Seagull Anton Chekhov Adapted by Simon Stephens

    The Seagull Anton Chekhov Adapted by Simon Stephens

    THE SEAGULL ANTON CHEKHOV ADAPTED BY SIMON STEPHENS major sponsor & community access partner WELCOME TO THE SEAGULL The artists and staff of Soulpepper and the Young Centre for the Performing Arts acknowledge the original caretakers and storytellers of this land – the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, and Wendat First Nation, and The Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation who are part of the Anishinaabe Nation. We commit to honouring and celebrating their past, present and future. “All around the world and throughout history, humans have acted out the stories that are significant to them, the stories that are central to their sense of who they are, the stories that have defined their communities, and shaped their societies. When we talk about classical theatre we want to explore what that means from the many perspectives of this city. This is a celebration of our global canon.” – Weyni Mengesha, Soulpepper’s Artistic Director photo by Emma Mcintyre Partners & Supporters James O’Sullivan & Lucie Valée Karrin Powys-Lybbe & Chris von Boetticher Sylvia Soyka Kathleen & Bill Troost 2 CAST & CREATIVE TEAM Cast Ghazal Azarbad Stuart Hughes Gregory Prest Marcia Hugo Boris Oliver Dennis Alex McCooeye Paolo Santalucia Peter Sorin Simeon Konstantin Raquel Duffy Kristen Thomson Sugith Varughese Pauline Irina Leo Hailey Gillis Dan Mousseau Nina Jacob Creative Team Daniel Brooks Matt Rideout Maricris Rivera Director Lead Audio Engineer Producing Assistant Anton Chekhov Weyni Mengesha Megan Woods Playwright Artistic Director Associate Production Manager Thomas Ryder Payne Emma Stenning Corey MacVicar Sound Designer Executive Director Associate Technical Director Frank Cox-O’Connell Tania Senewiratne Nik Murillo Associate Director Executive Producer Marketer Gregory Sinclair Mimi Warshaw Audio Producer Producer Thank You To Michelle Monteith, Daren A.
  • The Crucible Giles Corey

    The Crucible Giles Corey

    THE CRUCIBLE GILES COREY He is in his early 80s at the time of the trials. He represents the many innocent victims of the witch-trials in Salem His conscience would not let him answer to, of confess to something which he was not guilty of and he paid for this with his life. He is an example of moral integrity and an inspiration for John Proctor when he urges his torturers to place more weights on him. He showed great bravery up to his death. Personality – wise he is an argumentative but fundamentally honest farmer, who seems to have made a hobby out of taking people to court over land issues. He was always under the suspicious eye of the community for something – if ever a fire started or something went missing the first port of call was always Corey. The worst he could be accused of was being a nuisance and a ‘crank’ – but certainly not witchcraft. He didn’t care what other people thought of him and had only come to the church late in life when he had married Martha. He has quarrelled with Thomas Putnam over a piece of land. His mention of his wife’s fondness for reading puts her under suspicion. He knows that if he answers the court’s charge of witchcraft his sons will lose their right to inherit his land so he refuses to answer to the court. If he had denied the charge and been hanged they would have forfeit the right to inherit. He is pressed to death under large stones.
  • Drama and Theatre

    Drama and Theatre

    Drama and Theatre You need to do three things to be a top quality dramatist – watch theatre, read plays and create. The more you do these three things, the more you will fall in love with theatre, deepen your appreciation and understanding of the art form and develop your ability to produce sophisticated pieces of theatre. Doing any of these will develop your knowledge and ability, but the top drama students find the balance between all three: Watching theatre is the best way a drama practitioner gets inspired and generates initial ideas. You will see things on stage which will make you think or feel a certain way; it may prompt a cathartic response, shock you or make you consider a topic in a completely new light. As practitioners, we are constantly stealing and adapting each other’s ideas to create great theatre. Reading plays gives you a deeper appreciation of the history and tradition of theatre. It also allows you to consider a story and imagine your own directorial, design and performance interpretations. The more you read, the more you exercise your imagination. Creating is crucial to actually applying and practising the skills and ideas you get from watching and reading theatre. You cannot be a top quality dramatist if you do not practise the craft. And the process works both ways. Watching theatre and reading plays will make you a more inspired and informed creator. But creating will also give you a deeper and richer appreciation of the plays you watch and read. Below, I have outlined 16 of my favourite plays, all of which have made an incredibly important cultural contribution to theatre history.
  • Arthur Miller's "The Crucible"

    Arthur Miller's "The Crucible"

    Olivet Nazarene University Digital Commons @ Olivet Faculty Scholarship – Communication Communication Summer 2005 Arthur Miller's "The rC ucible" Jerald Cohagan Olivet Nazarene University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/comm_facp Part of the Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons Recommended Citation Cohagan, Jerald, "Arthur Miller's "The rC ucible"" (2005). Faculty Scholarship – Communication. 1. https://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/comm_facp/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication at Digital Commons @ Olivet. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship – Communication by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Olivet. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trial by Fire “We burn a hot fire here;” states Deputy-Governor Danforth in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible , “it melts down all concealment” (55). Miller’s title, which objectively means a container where metals are purified by being subjected to an intense heat, becomes an apt metaphor for the ordeal which his characters must undergo. Under such searing illumination Miller’s characters either attempt self-preservation by adding heat to the fire, succumb and melt from such heat, or are refined in the process and discover their own true mettle. Although many of the characters are culpable of pointing fingers, it is Abigail Williams, who Miller describes in his stage note as having “ an endless capacity for dissembling ” (6), who wastes no time in pointing the first finger at Tituba, Rev. Parris’s Negro slave from Barbados. When she first feels the heat of the Reverend Hale’s questions Abigail vehemently denies any communion with the devil and recants her denial almost within the same breath: HALE.
  • Colleague, Critic, and Sometime Counselor to Thomas Becket

    Colleague, Critic, and Sometime Counselor to Thomas Becket

    JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History–Doctor of Philosophy 2021 ABSTRACT JOHN OF SALISBURY: COLLEAGUE, CRITIC, AND SOMETIME COUNSELOR TO THOMAS BECKET By L. Susan Carter John of Salisbury was one of the best educated men in the mid-twelfth century. The beneficiary of twelve years of study in Paris under the tutelage of Peter Abelard and other scholars, John flourished alongside Thomas Becket in the Canterbury curia of Archbishop Theobald. There, his skills as a writer were of great value. Having lived through the Anarchy of King Stephen, he was a fierce advocate for the liberty of the English Church. Not surprisingly, John became caught up in the controversy between King Henry II and Thomas Becket, Henry’s former chancellor and successor to Theobald as archbishop of Canterbury. Prior to their shared time in exile, from 1164-1170, John had written three treatises with concern for royal court follies, royal pressures on the Church, and the danger of tyrants at the core of the Entheticus de dogmate philosophorum , the Metalogicon , and the Policraticus. John dedicated these works to Becket. The question emerges: how effective was John through dedicated treatises and his letters to Becket in guiding Becket’s attitudes and behavior regarding Church liberty? By means of contemporary communication theory an examination of John’s writings and letters directed to Becket creates a new vista on the relationship between John and Becket—and the impact of John on this martyred archbishop.
  • The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    The Crucible by Arthur Miller - character notes Deputy Governor Danforth • Is the presiding judge at the Salem trials and the John Proctor highest figure of authority in the play. • Is a farmer, the husband of Elizabeth Proctor, • Has an imposing presence and supreme and the father of three young sons. confidence that induces others to acquiesce • Is sturdily built, plain-spoken. readily to his authority. • Suffers inwardly from guilt caused by an • Is implacably determined to uphold the adulterous affair and counts himself a hypocrite legitimacy of the court, even at the expense of for maintaining an undeserved “good name.” truth and justice. • Is contrite and solicitous in his wife’s presence and yearns to regain her respect. Mary Warren • Is a common man who behaves heroically under • Is a lonely, impressionable girl who is servant to uncommon circumstances. the Proctors. • Redeems his honor by asserting his conscience • Is timorous and easily manipulated because of before an unjust authority. her desire for acceptance. • Embraces her mission to root out witches Elizabeth Proctor because it has transformed her dreary existence • Is John’s wife and the mother of his sons. into a momentous drama of great consequence. • Has a clear conscience, common sense, and • Lacks the fortitude and sense of identity to stand lucid intelligence. alone against the crowd. • Is sometimes reticent and does not readily express her warmth. Reverend Samuel Parris • Is decisive in crisis and stoic in the face of • Is a widower in his forties who has been minister calamity. at Salem for three years. • Is unfailingly loyal to her husband despite his • Is obsessed with securing his social position and infidelity.
  • The Crucible Character List John Proctor Elizabeth Proctor Abigail

    The Crucible Character List John Proctor Elizabeth Proctor Abigail

    The Crucible Character List John Proctor A farmer in Salem, Proctor serves as the voice of reason and justice in The Crucible. It is he who exposes the girls as frauds who are only pretending that there is witchcraft, and thus becomes the tragic hero of the tale. Proctor is a sharply intelligent man who can easily detect foolishness in others and expose it, but he questions his own moral sense. Because of his affair with Abigail Williams, Proctor questions whether or not he is a moral man, yet this past event is the only major flaw attributed to Proctor, who is in all other respects honorable and ethical. It is a sign of his morality that he does not feel himself adequate to place himself as a martyr for the cause of justice when he is given the choice to save himself at the end of the play. Elizabeth Proctor The wife of John Proctor, Elizabeth shares with John a similarly strict adherence to justice and moral principles She is a woman who has great confidence in her own morality and in the ability of a person to maintain a sense of righteousness, both internal and external, even when this principle conflicts with strict Christian doctrine. Although she is regarded as a woman of unimpeachable honesty, it is this reputation that causes her husband to be condemned when she lies about his affair with Abigail, thinking it will save him. However, Elizabeth can be a cold and demanding woman, whose chilly demeanor may have driven her husband to adultery and whose continual suspicions of her husband render their marriage tense.
  • Arthur Miller's Contentious Dialogue with America

    Arthur Miller's Contentious Dialogue with America

    Louise Callinan Revered Abroad, Abused at Home: Arthur Miller’s contentious dialogue with America A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at St Patrick’s College, Dublin City University Supervisor: Auxiliary Supervisor: Dr Brenn a Clarke Dr Noreen Doody Dept of English Dept of English St Patrick’s College St Patrick’s College Drumcondra Drumcondra May 2010 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of PhD is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has-been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: Qoli |i/U i/|______________ ID No.: 55103316 Date: May 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am forever indebted to Dr. Brenna Clarke for her ‘3-D’ vision, and all that she has so graciously taught me. A veritable fountain of knowledge, encouragement, and patient support, she- has-been a formative force to me, and will remain a true inspiration. Thank you appears paltry, yet it is deeply meant and intended as an expression of my profound gratitude. A sincere and heartfelt thank you is also extended to Dr. Noreen Doody for her significant contribution and generosity of time and spirit. Thank you also to Dr. Mary Shine Thompson, and the Research Office. A special note to Sharon, for her encyclopaedic knowledge and ‘inside track’ in negotiating the research minefield. This thesis is an acknowledgement of the efforts of my family, and in particular the constant support of my parents.