DOCSLIB.ORG

Icosahedral Skeletal Polyhedra Realizing Petrie Relatives of Gordan's Regular Map Arxiv:1210.2064V1 [Math.CO] 7 Oct 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Icosahedral Skeletal Polyhedra Realizing Petrie Relatives of Gordan's Regular Map Arxiv:1210.2064V1 [Math.CO] 7 Oct 2012 Icosahedral Skeletal Polyhedra Realizing Petrie Relatives of Gordan's Regular Map Anthony M. Cutler Boston, MA 02115, USA and Egon Schulte∗ Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115, USA and J¨orgM. Wills University of Siegen D-57068 Siegen, Germany November 12, 2018 Abstract Every regular map on a closed surface gives rise to generally six regular maps, its Petrie relatives, that are obtained through iteration of the duality and Petrie op- erations (taking duals and Petrie-duals). It is shown that the skeletal polyhedra in Euclidean 3-space which realize a Petrie relative of the classical Gordan regular map and have full icosahedral symmetry, comprise precisely four infinite families of polyhedra, as well as four individual polyhedra. Key words. Regular polyhedra; geometric graphs; regular maps on surfaces; Gordan's map; abstract polytopes. arXiv:1210.2064v1 [math.CO] 7 Oct 2012 MSC 2000. Primary: 51M20. Secondary: 52B15. ∗Supported by NSF-grant DMS{0856675 1 1 Introduction It is well-known that the Petrie relatives of a regular map on a closed surface form a family of generally six regular maps with the same automorphism group, obtained from the original map under iteration of the duality and Petrie operations (taking duals and Petrie-duals); see Coxeter & Moser [4], McMullen & Schulte [14, Ch. 7B] or Wilson [19]. The purpose of this short note is to point out that the skeletal polyhedra in Euclidean 3-space E3 which realize a Petrie relative of the classical Gordan [9] regular map and have full icosahedral symmetry, comprise precisely four infinite families of polyhedra, as well as four additional, individual polyhedra. Here a skeletal polyhedron is a finite geometric edge-graph in space equipped with a polyhedral face structure; see Gr¨unbaum [10] and [14, Ch. 7E], as well as Section 2. The icosahedral polyhedra described in this paper are particularly interesting examples of regular polyhedra of index 2 (see Cutler [7], Cutler & Schulte [8], Wills [18]); that is, they are combinatorially regular but \fail geometric regularity by a factor of 2". Four polyhedra were previously known and have an interesting history; namely, the planar- faced polyhedral realizations of Gordan's map f5; 4g6 and its dual f4; 5g6 of genus 4, as well as of f6; 5g4 and f5; 6g4 of genus 9. These give four of just five regular polyhedra of index 2 which are orientable and have planar faces (see [18] for the enumeration and Richter [15] for figures). The polyhedra for f5; 4g6 and f5; 6g4 were discovered by Hess (1878), Pitsch (1881) and Badoureau (1881); for the history see Coxeter [3, x6.4], and for figures see [3, Fig. 4.4a] and Coxeter, Longuet-Higgins & Miller [6, Figs. 45, 53]. The polyhedra for f4; 5g6 and f6; 5g4, respectively, are obtained from the polyhedra for f5; 4g6 and f5; 6g4 by polarity (see Gr¨unbaum & Shephard [12]); for figures see [3, Fig. 6.4c], [5, De2f2 on Plate XI], and [16]. In addition to these classical examples, new icosahedral polyhedra for Petrie relatives of Gordan's map can be derived from the complete classification of the finite regular polyhedra of index 2 in [7, 8]. It turns out that this provides a complete list of possible realizations. Overall, each Petrie relative is seen to admit a skeletal realization with icosahedral symmetry, and some relatives can even be realized in more than one way. 2 Maps and skeletal polyhedra Skeletal polyhedra were first investigated in Gr¨unbaum [10]. A priori they are not solid figures bounded by faces spanned by membranes, but rather more general discrete poly- hedral structures with convex or non-convex, planar or skew, and finite or infinite (helical or zig-zag) polygonal faces and vertex-figures. Here we are only concerned with finite polyhedral structures, so in particular helical or zigzag faces will not occur. 3 To begin with, a (finite) polygon, or simply an n-gon,(v1; v2; : : : ; vn) in E is a figure formed by distinct points v1; : : : ; vn, together with the line segments (vi; vi+1), for i = 1; : : : ; n − 1, and (vn; v1). The points and line segments are the vertices and edges of the 2 polygon. Note that polygons are edge cycles, not topological discs, and may or may not be plane polygons. 3 A (finite) skeletal polyhedron, or simply polyhedron, P in E consists of a finite set VP of points, called vertices, a finite set EP of line segments, called edges, joining points of VP , and a finite set FP of polygons, called faces, formed by line segments of EP such that the following three conditions hold. First, P is globally connected, in the sense that the edge graph of P defined by VP and EP is connected; and second, P is locally connected, meaning that the vertex-figure of P at every vertex of P is connected. Recall here that the vertex-figure of P at a vertex v is the graph whose vertices are the neighbors of v in the edge graph of P and whose edges are the line segments (u; w), where (u; v) and (v; w) are edges of a common face of P . Third, each edge of P is an edge of exactly two faces of P . For combinatorial purposes we identify a polyhedron P with the underlying map on a closed compact (orientable or non-orientable) surface; see [4, 14]. Thus skeletal polyhedra in E3 are 3-dimensional geometric realizations of abstract polyhedra in the sense of [14, Ch. 7E] (see also [10, 11] and [13]). Note, however, that a skeletal polyhedron is a finite geometric edge graph in E3 equipped with a distinguished face structure; it is not a solid figure. A map P is (combinatorially) regular if its automorphism group Γ (P ) is transitive on the flags (incident vertex-edge-face triples). The automorphism group Γ (P ) of a regular map is generated by involutions ρ0; ρ1; ρ2 satisfying (at least) the Coxeter-type relations 2 2 2 p q 2 ρ0 = ρ1 = ρ2 = (ρ0ρ1) = (ρ1ρ2) = (ρ0ρ2) = 1; (1) where p and q determine the type fp; qg of P . Thus Γ (P ) is a quotient of the Coxeter group [p; q] abstractly defined by the relations in (1). The Petrie-dual of a regular map P is a (regular) map with the same vertices and edges as P , obtained by replacing the faces of P by the Petrie polygons of P . Recall that a Petrie polygon of P is a polygon along the edges of P such that any two, but no three, consecutive edges belong to a common face. The iteration of taking duals and Petrie-duals gives rise to a family of generally six regular maps, the Petrie relatives of P , all sharing the same automorphism group. Following [4], we let fp; qgr denote a regular map derived from the spherical, Euclidean, or hyperbolic regular plane tessellation fp; qg by identifying any two vertices r steps apart along a Petrie polygon of fp; qg. The automorphism group of fp; qgr is abstractly defined r by (1) and the relation (ρ0ρ1ρ2) = 1. The dual and Petrie-dual of fp; qgr are the maps fq; pgr and fr; qgp, respectively. Thus the Petrie relatives of fp; qgr are given by fp; qgr, fq; pgr, fr; qgp, fq; rgp, fr; pgq, and fp; rgq. Note that fp; qgr is orientable if and only if r is even. The present paper focuses on icosahedral polyhedra realizing a Petrie relative of Gor- dan's map f5; 4g6. In this case the six Petrie relatives are given by f5; 4g6; f4; 5g6; f6; 4g5; f4; 6g5; f6; 5g4; f5; 6g4; (2) 3 and all have the same automorphism group of order 240. The first two maps are orientable of genus 4; the next two are non-orientable of genus 12; and the last two are orientable of genus 9. A polyhedron with full icosahedral symmetry realizing a map in (2) must be a regular polyhedron of index 2 in the sense of [18, 8]. Recall that P is a regular polyhedron of index 2 if P is a regular map and the geometric symmetry group G(P ) of P is a subgroup of Γ (P ) of index 2. For Gordan's map and its relatives, G(P ) is the full icosahedral group of order 120 and has index 2 in Γ (P ). 3 The polyhedra It follows from the above analysis that the desired icosahedral skeletal polyhedra for Gordan's map and its relatives are precisely the regular polyhedra of index 2 that have full icosahedral symmetry and are combinatorially isomorphic to a map in (2). This allows us to draw upon the complete enumeration of the finite regular polyhedra of index 2 obtained in [7, 8]. It was shown in [8] that up to similarity there are precisely 22 infinite families of regular polyhedra of index 2 with vertices on two orbits under the full symmetry group, where two polyhedra belong to the same family if they differ only in the relative size of the spheres containing their vertex orbits; all polyhedra in these 22 families are orientable, but only two have planar faces. The complete enumeration of the remaining regular polyhedra of index 2, with vertices on one orbit, is described in [7]; there are exactly 10 such (individual) polyhedra. In particular, this establishes the following theorem. Theorem 3.1. The skeletal polyhedra in E3 which realize a Petrie relative of the Gordan regular map and have full icosahedral symmetry, comprise precisely four infinite families of polyhedra, as well as four individual polyhedra. Details about these polyhedra are summarized in Table 1; the first four rows concern the polyhedra occurring in an infinite family, and the last four rows the individual poly- hedra.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš
    Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš To cite this version: Stanislav Jendrol’, František Kardoš. Symmetry of Fulleroids. Klaus D. Sattler. Handbook of Nanophysics: Clusters and Fullerenes, CRC Press, pp.28-1 - 28-13, 2010, 9781420075557. hal- 00966781 HAL Id: hal-00966781 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00966781 Submitted on 27 Mar 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Symmetry of Fulleroids Stanislav Jendrol’ and Frantiˇsek Kardoˇs Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, P. J. Saf´arikˇ University, Koˇsice Jesenn´a5, 041 54 Koˇsice, Slovakia +421 908 175 621; +421 904 321 185 [email protected]; [email protected] Contents 1 Symmetry of Fulleroids 2 1.1 Convexpolyhedraandplanargraphs . .... 3 1.2 Polyhedral symmetries and graph automorphisms . ........ 4 1.3 Pointsymmetrygroups. 5 1.4 Localrestrictions ............................... .. 10 1.5 Symmetryoffullerenes . .. 11 1.6 Icosahedralfulleroids . .... 12 1.7 Subgroups of Ih ................................. 15 1.8 Fulleroids with multi-pentagonal faces . ......... 16 1.9 Fulleroids with octahedral, prismatic, or pyramidal symmetry ........ 19 1.10 (5, 7)-fulleroids .................................. 20 1 Chapter 1 Symmetry of Fulleroids One of the important features of the structure of molecules is the presence of symmetry elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Polyhedra of Index 2
    REGULAR POLYHEDRA OF INDEX 2 A dissertation presented by Anthony Cutler to The Department of Mathematics In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Mathematics Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April, 2009 1 REGULAR POLYHEDRA OF INDEX 2 by Anthony Cutler ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Northeastern University, April 2009 2 We classify all finite regular polyhedra of index 2, as defined in Section 2 herein. The definition requires the polyhedra to be combinatorially flag transitive, but does not require them to have planar or convex faces or vertex-figures, and neither does it require the polyhedra to be orientable. We find there are 10 combinatorially regular polyhedra of index 2 with vertices on one orbit, and 22 infinite families of combinatorially regular polyhedra of index 2 with vertices on two orbits, where polyhedra in the same family differ only in the relative diameters of their vertex orbits. For each such polyhedron, or family of polyhedra, we provide the underlying map, as well as a geometric diagram showing a representative face for each face orbit, and a verification of the polyhedron’s combinatorial regularity. A self-contained completeness proof is given. Exactly five of the polyhedra have planar faces, which is consistent with a previously known result. We conclude by describing a non-Petrie duality relation among regular polyhedra of index 2, and suggest how it can be extended to other combinatorially regular polyhedra.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Atomic Orbital Hybridization of Coordination Polyhedra: Role of F Orbitals
    molecules Article Systematics of Atomic Orbital Hybridization of Coordination Polyhedra: Role of f Orbitals R. Bruce King Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Vito Lippolis Received: 4 June 2020; Accepted: 29 June 2020; Published: 8 July 2020 Abstract: The combination of atomic orbitals to form hybrid orbitals of special symmetries can be related to the individual orbital polynomials. Using this approach, 8-orbital cubic hybridization can be shown to be sp3d3f requiring an f orbital, and 12-orbital hexagonal prismatic hybridization can be shown to be sp3d5f2g requiring a g orbital. The twists to convert a cube to a square antiprism and a hexagonal prism to a hexagonal antiprism eliminate the need for the highest nodality orbitals in the resulting hybrids. A trigonal twist of an Oh octahedron into a D3h trigonal prism can involve a gradual change of the pair of d orbitals in the corresponding sp3d2 hybrids. A similar trigonal twist of an Oh cuboctahedron into a D3h anticuboctahedron can likewise involve a gradual change in the three f orbitals in the corresponding sp3d5f3 hybrids. Keywords: coordination polyhedra; hybridization; atomic orbitals; f-block elements 1. Introduction In a series of papers in the 1990s, the author focused on the most favorable coordination polyhedra for sp3dn hybrids, such as those found in transition metal complexes. Such studies included an investigation of distortions from ideal symmetries in relatively symmetrical systems with molecular orbital degeneracies [1] In the ensuing quarter century, interest in actinide chemistry has generated an increasing interest in the involvement of f orbitals in coordination chemistry [2–7].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – P. 1
    Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – p. 1 - 1. Symmetry of Molecules 1.1 Symmetry Elements · Symmetry operation: Operation that transforms a molecule to an equivalent position and orientation, i.e. after the operation every point of the molecule is coincident with an equivalent point. · Symmetry element: Geometrical entity (line, plane or point) which respect to which one or more symmetry operations can be carried out. In molecules there are only four types of symmetry elements or operations: · Mirror planes: reflection with respect to plane; notation: s · Center of inversion: inversion of all atom positions with respect to inversion center, notation i · Proper axis: Rotation by 2p/n with respect to the axis, notation Cn · Improper axis: Rotation by 2p/n with respect to the axis, followed by reflection with respect to plane, perpendicular to axis, notation Sn Formally, this classification can be further simplified by expressing the inversion i as an improper rotation S2 and the reflection s as an improper rotation S1. Thus, the only symmetry elements in molecules are Cn and Sn. Important: Successive execution of two symmetry operation corresponds to another symmetry operation of the molecule. In order to make this statement a general rule, we require one more symmetry operation, the identity E. (1.1: Symmetry elements in CH4, successive execution of symmetry operations) 1.2. Systematic classification by symmetry groups According to their inherent symmetry elements, molecules can be classified systematically in so called symmetry groups. We use the so-called Schönfliess notation to name the groups, Chapter 1 – Symmetry of Molecules – p. 2 - which is the usual notation for molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ?
    Can Every Face of a Polyhedron Have Many Sides ? Branko Grünbaum Dedicated to Joe Malkevitch, an old friend and colleague, who was always partial to polyhedra Abstract. The simple question of the title has many different answers, depending on the kinds of faces we are willing to consider, on the types of polyhedra we admit, and on the symmetries we require. Known results and open problems about this topic are presented. The main classes of objects considered here are the following, listed in increasing generality: Faces: convex n-gons, starshaped n-gons, simple n-gons –– for n ≥ 3. Polyhedra (in Euclidean 3-dimensional space): convex polyhedra, starshaped polyhedra, acoptic polyhedra, polyhedra with selfintersections. Symmetry properties of polyhedra P: Isohedron –– all faces of P in one orbit under the group of symmetries of P; monohedron –– all faces of P are mutually congru- ent; ekahedron –– all faces have of P the same number of sides (eka –– Sanskrit for "one"). If the number of sides is k, we shall use (k)-isohedron, (k)-monohedron, and (k)- ekahedron, as appropriate. We shall first describe the results that either can be found in the literature, or ob- tained by slight modifications of these. Then we shall show how two systematic ap- proaches can be used to obtain results that are better –– although in some cases less visu- ally attractive than the old ones. There are many possible combinations of these classes of faces, polyhedra and symmetries, but considerable reductions in their number are possible; we start with one of these, which is well known even if it is hard to give specific references for precisely the assertion of Theorem 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In Boron Chemistry
    Bull. Mater. Sci., Vol. 22, No. 5, August 1999, pp. 863-867. © Indian Academy of Sciences. The ubiquitous icosahedral B12 in boron chemistry E D JEMMIS* and M M BALAKRISHNARAJAN School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad500 046. India Abstract. Though boranes exhibit a wide variety of polyhedral structures, all the three polymorpbs of elemental boron essentially contain icosahedral Bn units as the predominant building block in their unit cell. Theoretical and experimental studies on boranes show that the icosuhedral arrangement leads to most stable boranes and borane anions. This paper attempts to explain the phenomenal stability associated with the icosahedral Bn structure. Using fragment molecular orbital theory, the remarkable stability of BI2Ht2~ among closo boranes are explained. The preferential selection icosahedral B12 unit by elemental boron is explained by improvising a contrived B84 sub-unit of the ~-rhombohedron, the most stable polymorph. This also leads to a novel covalent way of stuffing fnilerenes with icosahedral symmetry. Keywords. Boron; polyhedral closo borane dianions; icosahedral B12; ~-rhombohedral polymorph; orbital compatibility. 1. Introduction Elemental boron exists in three different polymorphic forms (Wells 1979). The thermodynamically most stable The chemistry of boron formed a vast discipline by itself [t-rhombohedral form has 105 boron atoms in its unit cell. and helped to alter the concept of structure and bonding The next stable ~-rhombohedral form has 12 boron atoms. radically (Lipscomb 1963). Starting from the famous The meta stable ~-tetragonal form has fifty boron atoms three-centre two-electron bond, many of the structural in its unit cell. The icosahedral BI2 unit is the primary features exhibited by boron compounds (most signifi- building block in all of these polymorphic forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrie Schemes
    Canad. J. Math. Vol. 57 (4), 2005 pp. 844–870 Petrie Schemes Gordon Williams Abstract. Petrie polygons, especially as they arise in the study of regular polytopes and Coxeter groups, have been studied by geometers and group theorists since the early part of the twentieth century. An open question is the determination of which polyhedra possess Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. The current work explores combinatorial structures in abstract polytopes, called Petrie schemes, that generalize the notion of a Petrie polygon. It is established that all of the regular convex polytopes and honeycombs in Euclidean spaces, as well as all of the Grunbaum–Dress¨ polyhedra, pos- sess Petrie schemes that are not self-intersecting and thus have Petrie polygons that are simple closed curves. Partial results are obtained for several other classes of less symmetric polytopes. 1 Introduction Historically, polyhedra have been conceived of either as closed surfaces (usually topo- logical spheres) made up of planar polygons joined edge to edge or as solids enclosed by such a surface. In recent times, mathematicians have considered polyhedra to be convex polytopes, simplicial spheres, or combinatorial structures such as abstract polytopes or incidence complexes. A Petrie polygon of a polyhedron is a sequence of edges of the polyhedron where any two consecutive elements of the sequence have a vertex and face in common, but no three consecutive edges share a commonface. For the regular polyhedra, the Petrie polygons form the equatorial skew polygons. Petrie polygons may be defined analogously for polytopes as well. Petrie polygons have been very useful in the study of polyhedra and polytopes, especially regular polytopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1705.01294V1
    Branes and Polytopes Luca Romano email address: [email protected] ABSTRACT We investigate the hierarchies of half-supersymmetric branes in maximal supergravity theories. By studying the action of the Weyl group of the U-duality group of maximal supergravities we discover a set of universal algebraic rules describing the number of independent 1/2-BPS p-branes, rank by rank, in any dimension. We show that these relations describe the symmetries of certain families of uniform polytopes. This induces a correspondence between half-supersymmetric branes and vertices of opportune uniform polytopes. We show that half-supersymmetric 0-, 1- and 2-branes are in correspondence with the vertices of the k21, 2k1 and 1k2 families of uniform polytopes, respectively, while 3-branes correspond to the vertices of the rectified version of the 2k1 family. For 4-branes and higher rank solutions we find a general behavior. The interpretation of half- supersymmetric solutions as vertices of uniform polytopes reveals some intriguing aspects. One of the most relevant is a triality relation between 0-, 1- and 2-branes. arXiv:1705.01294v1 [hep-th] 3 May 2017 Contents Introduction 2 1 Coxeter Group and Weyl Group 3 1.1 WeylGroup........................................ 6 2 Branes in E11 7 3 Algebraic Structures Behind Half-Supersymmetric Branes 12 4 Branes ad Polytopes 15 Conclusions 27 A Polytopes 30 B Petrie Polygons 30 1 Introduction Since their discovery branes gained a prominent role in the analysis of M-theories and du- alities [1]. One of the most important class of branes consists in Dirichlet branes, or D-branes. D-branes appear in string theory as boundary terms for open strings with mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions and, due to their tension, scaling with a negative power of the string cou- pling constant, they are non-perturbative objects [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Polyhedra Through Time
    Fields Institute I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries September 2011 Regular polyhedra through time The greeks were the first to study the symmetries of polyhedra. Euclid, in his Elements showed that there are only five regular solids (that can be seen in Figure 1). In this context, a polyhe- dron is regular if all its polygons are regular and equal, and you can find the same number of them at each vertex. Figure 1: Platonic Solids. It is until 1619 that Kepler finds other two regular polyhedra: the great dodecahedron and the great icosahedron (on Figure 2. To do so, he allows \false" vertices and intersection of the (convex) faces of the polyhedra at points that are not vertices of the polyhedron, just as the I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries Page 1 Figure 2: Kepler polyhedra. 1619. pentagram allows intersection of edges at points that are not vertices of the polygon. In this way, the vertex-figure of these two polyhedra are pentagrams (see Figure 3). Figure 3: A regular convex pentagon and a pentagram, also regular! In 1809 Poinsot re-discover Kepler's polyhedra, and discovers its duals: the small stellated dodecahedron and the great stellated dodecahedron (that are shown in Figure 4). The faces of such duals are pentagrams, and are organized on a \convex" way around each vertex. Figure 4: The other two Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra. 1809. A couple of years later Cauchy showed that these are the only four regular \star" polyhedra. We note that the convex hull of the great dodecahedron, great icosahedron and small stellated dodecahedron is the icosahedron, while the convex hull of the great stellated dodecahedron is the dodecahedron.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Capsids and Self Assembly Viral Capsids
    MAE 545: Lecture 22 (12/10) Viral capsids and self assembly Viral capsids helical symmetry icosahedral symmetry complex symmetry Hepatitis B virus conical shaped capsid proteins are wrapped (spherical caps usually around the viral RNA still icosahedral) (e.g. Tobacco Mosaic Virus) Poxvirus Note: many viruses also HIV have envelope (lipid bilayer) around the capsid 2 Icosahedral capsids Brome mosaic Bacteriophage Cowpea Chlorotic L-A virus Dengue virus virus φ X 174 Mottle virus Tobacco Human Hepatitis Sindbis virus Bacteriophage Necrosis virus B Virus Simian virus HK97 Colors correspond to different proteins. 3 Generating Vectors for the Lattice Structures of Tubular and Conical Viral Capsids 129 number, to form with icosahedral symmetry. The quasi-equivalence is demonstrated in the experiment results reported in [30]. There are also many viruses that have tubular or lozenge-like capsids. Mature HIV-1 cores have cone- shaped capsids [1, 11]. Unlike the icosahedral viral capsids, the structures of tubular and conical capsids are not yet fully understood. There have been models for the lattice structures of tubular and conical capsids, see [17, 21] and references therein. However, there is a aw in the Nguyen model [21], which missed the requirement on the cone height and could result in incomplete cones if the model is inappropriately applied. In this paper, we propose new models for tubular and conical capsids in a unied fashion based on an extension of the Capser-Klug quasi-equivalence theory. The new models are easier than the existing models. When applied to the HIV-1 (5,7)-cone (5 pentagons in the narrow end and 7 pentagons in the broad end), the capsid properties derived from our models show good agreement with published experimental data.
    [Show full text]
  • Quartic Surfaces with Icosahedral Symmetry
    Adv. Geom. 2018; 18 (1):119–132 Igor V. Dolgachev* Quartic surfaces with icosahedral symmetry DOI 10.1515/advgeom-2017-0040. Received 23 September, 2016; revised 9 April, 2017 3 Abstract: We study smooth quartic surfaces in ℙ which admit a group of projective automorphisms isomor- phic to the icosahedron group. Keywords: Quartic surface, icosahedron group. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14J10 || Communicated by: I. Coskun 1 Introduction Let A5 be the icosahedron group isomorphic to the alternating group in 5 letters. Starting from Platonic solids, it appears as an omnipresent symmetry group in geometry. In this article, complementing papers [4] and [5], 3 we discuss families of smooth quartic surfaces in ℙ that admit the group A5 as its group of projective sym- metries. It follows from loc. cit. that any smooth quartic surface S with a faithful action of A5 belongs to one of the two pencils of invariant quartic surfaces. One of them arises from a linear irreducible 4-dimensional representation of A5 and was studied in great detail by K. Hashimoto in [10]. It contains a double quadric and four surfaces with 5, 10, 10, or 15 ordinary double points. The other pencil arises from a faithful linear representation of the binary icosahedron group 2.A5. As was shown in [4] and [5], it contains two singular surfaces singular along its own rational normal cubic and two surfaces with 10 ordinary double points. In this paper we show first that one of the surfaces with 10 ordinary double points from Hashimoto’s pencil can be realized as a Cayley quartic symmetroid defined by a A5-invariant web W of quadrics (this result was independently obtained by S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Transformations Groups, Orbits, and Spaces of Orbits
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION Chapter 3: Transformations Groups, Orbits, And Spaces Of Orbits Gregory W. Moore Abstract: This chapter focuses on of group actions on spaces, group orbits, and spaces of orbits. Then we discuss mathematical symmetric objects of various kinds. May 3, 2019 -TOC- Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Definitions and the stabilizer-orbit theorem 2 2.0.1 The stabilizer-orbit theorem 6 2.1 First examples 7 2.1.1 The Case Of 1 + 1 Dimensions 11 3. Action of a topological group on a topological space 14 3.1 Left and right group actions of G on itself 19 4. Spaces of orbits 20 4.1 Simple examples 21 4.2 Fundamental domains 22 4.3 Algebras and double cosets 28 4.4 Orbifolds 28 4.5 Examples of quotients which are not manifolds 29 4.6 When is the quotient of a manifold by an equivalence relation another man- ifold? 33 5. Isometry groups 34 6. Symmetries of regular objects 36 6.1 Symmetries of polygons in the plane 39 3 6.2 Symmetry groups of some regular solids in R 42 6.3 The symmetry group of a baseball 43 7. The symmetries of the platonic solids 44 7.1 The cube (\hexahedron") and octahedron 45 7.2 Tetrahedron 47 7.3 The icosahedron 48 7.4 No more regular polyhedra 50 7.5 Remarks on the platonic solids 50 7.5.1 Mathematics 51 7.5.2 History of Physics 51 7.5.3 Molecular physics 51 7.5.4 Condensed Matter Physics 52 7.5.5 Mathematical Physics 52 7.5.6 Biology 52 7.5.7 Human culture: Architecture, art, music and sports 53 7.6 Regular polytopes in higher dimensions 53 { 1 { 8.
    [Show full text]