DOCSLIB.ORG

General and Regional Elections in Guyana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EOM/OAS ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION FINAL REPORT Organization of American States GENERAL AND REGIONAL GENERAL AND REGIONAL ELECTIONS, GUYANA 2011 GENERAL AND REGIONAL ELECTIONS, GUYANA ELECTIONS IN GUYANA NOVEMBER 28, 2011 Organization of American States Secretariat for Political Affairs Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation 17th Street & Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Electoral Observation Missions (EOMs) USA Organization of American States (OAS) ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION FINAL REPORT GENERAL AND REGIONAL ELECTIONS IN GUYANA NOVEMBER 28, 2011 General Secretariat Organization of American States José Miguel Insulza Secretary General Albert R. Ramdin Assistant Secretary General Kevin Casas-Zamora Secretary for Political Affairs Pablo Gutiérrez Director Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Final report of the OAS Electoral Observation Mission for the General and Regional Elections in the Republic of Guyana : November 28, 2011 / [Prepared by the Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation]. p. ; cm. (Electoral Observations in the Americas series, no. 77) ; (OEA/Ser.D/XX SG/DCOE/II.77) ; (OEA/Ser.G CP/ doc.4800/12) ISBN 978-0-8270-5930-6 1. Elections--Guyana. 2. Election monitoring--Guyana. I. Organization of American States. Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation. II. Series. III. Series: OEA/Ser.G CP/doc.4800/12. OEA/Ser.D/XX SG/DCOE/II.77 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................7 A. Electoral Observation Missions of the Organization of American States (OAS/EOM) .........................................................................................................................7 B. Organization and Nature of the Mission ..............................................................................7 C. Methodology to Incorporate a Gender Perspective .........................................................7 CHAPTER II. POLITICAL SYSTEM AND ELECTORAL ORGANIZATION ................9 A. Political Organization ............................................................................................................... 9 B. Legal Framework ...........................................................................................................................11 C. Electoral Authorities and Electoral Jurisdiction ........................................................... 11 D. Political Financing........................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER III. MISSION ACTIVITIES AND OBSERVATIONS.....................................................15 A. Pre-Electoral Phase ......................................................................................................................15 B. Election Day..................................................................................................................................... 19 C. Post-Electoral Process.................................................................................................................. 24 CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................27 CHAPTER V. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................29 APPENDICES.............................................................................................................................................31 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 23, 2011 the Government of the Republic political contenders. While the voting process was generally of Guyana formally invited the Organization of American smooth, several late changes to the process, particularly States to observe the 2011 General and Regional Elections in changes in polling station locations, led to some voter Guyana. The Secretary General accepted the invitation, and confusion. Nonetheless, the significant efforts made by on November 28, 2011 the citizens of Guyana went to the the Guyanese Electoral Commission (GECOM) to execute polls to elect members of 10 regional councils, 65 National an overall inclusive and clean electoral process were in Assembly representatives and their President. This was the evidence on election day, as was the high level of training third time that the OAS had observed elections in Guyana, and dedication exhibited by GECOM staff in the polling following the deployment of missions in 2001 and 2006. centers. Following the close of the polls, the vote counting and transmission process lasted for three days before the The OAS Electoral Observation Mission deployed official declaration of results and was characterized by a by the General Secretariat consisted of 25 observers from a lack of uniform procedures. total of 14 countries: 12 member states (Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Regarding the results of the 2011 General Elections, St. Lucia, Trinidad & Tobago, the United States of America the incumbent People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) and Venezuela) and two observer nations (France and the won 48.6% of the total valid votes, ushering in a fifth United Kingdom). The Mission was installed in Guyana on consecutive term for the PPP/C government. Mr. Donald November 20th, and international observers were deployed Ramotar was elected president. The PPP/C obtained a the week prior to the elections. On Election Day, observers total of 32 of the 65 seats in the National Assembly while were present in nine of the country’s 10 administrative the combined opposition parties won the majority of seats, regions, with visits made to over 13% of polling stations. resulting in the first minority government in Guyanese The Mission maintained a 24 hour presence in the history. For the opposition, A Partnership for National tabulation center until the scheduled declaration of results, Unity (APNU) received 26 seats with 40.8% of the total vote, and departed Guyana on December 2nd, following the final the Alliance for Change (AFC) won 7 seats with 10.3%, and declaration. The United Force won 0.3% of the vote. In the pre-electoral period, the Mission observed The OAS Electoral Observation Mission would like that the campaign was characterized by a perception of to express its gratitude to the Governments of Argentina, limited differentiation between the state and the governing Chile, Serbia, the United Kingdom and the United States party in terms of access to media and campaign finance for of America along with Elections Canada for providing contributions to this EOM. 5 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSIONS OF THE B. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF THE MISSION ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS/EOMS) In an exchange of correspondence beginning in June OAS Electoral Observation Missions (OAS/EOMs) 2011, the Government of the Republic of Guyana invited constitute a key instrument in the defense and promotion the Organization of American States to field an Electoral of democracy in the continent. They help guarantee the Observation Mission to observe the General and Regional integrity, impartiality, and accountability of numerous Elections due to take place in the fourth quarter of 2011. electoral processes and strengthen the credibility of The OAS responded positively to this request and set in democratic institutions in Member States. motion preparations for an Electoral Observation Mission to observe the final days of campaigning, the conduct of The presence of an OAS/EOM represents the the poll for the General Elections, the counting of ballots, solidarity and support of the Inter-American community and the immediate post-election process. Prior to Election towards the efforts undertaken by democratic institutions Day, the OAS Mission signed an Agreement of Privileges in states that organize and administer their own electoral and Immunities with the Government of Guyana as well as processes. OAS Missions promote the recognition of an Agreement on Observation Procedures with the Guyana political rights, particularly the right to suffrage, as the Elections Commission. This was the third OAS Electoral legitimate expression of the opportunity of every citizen Observation Mission in Guyana. to elect representatives and to be elected in an inclusive and free manner. OAS/EOMs also promote respect for the The EOM Core Group comprised specialists in the political will of the people as expressed through the ballot areas of electoral organization, logistics, political analysis, box. gender analysis and media, as well as a legal advisor. Regional coordinators and international observers were Since 2007, the OAS has refined its election deployed on November 26th to the following areas: Region observation methodology, based on key documents of 1, Region 2, Region 3, Region 4, Region 5, Region 6, Region the Inter-American and International Systems, such as 7, Region 9 and Region 10. The Mission left Guyana on the Inter-American Democratic Charter, the Declaration December 2, 2011. of Principles for International Election Observation and the Code of Conduct for International Election Observers. The Mission fielded 25 observers from 12 OAS The Inter-American Democratic Charter emphasizes the Member States (Antigua &
Recommended publications
  • Proceedings and Debates of the National Assembly of the First

    Proceedings and Debates of the National Assembly of the First

    PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE FIRST SESSION (2006-2011) OF THE NINTH PARLIAMENT OF GUYANA UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA HELD IN THE PARLIAMENT CHAMBER, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, BRICKDAM, GEORGETOWN 159TH Sitting Thursday, 21ST July, 2011 The Assembly convened at 3.06 p.m. Prayers [Mdm. Deputy Speaker in the Chair] ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE SPEAKER Condolence to Minister Jennifer Westford on the death of her father Mdm. Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, I was informed that the Father of the Hon. Minister of Public Service, Dr. Jennifer R. A. Westford, MP, died yesterday afternoon at the St. Joseph’s Mercy Hospital after a brief illness. On behalf of the Members of the Assembly, and on myself, I would like to extend our deepest sympathy to Dr. Westford, her mother, and the other children of the late Mr. Reginald Westford. The funeral will be held at the Merriman’s Funeral Home tomorrow, Friday, 22nd July; viewing will be from 12 noon followed by a funeral service at 1.00 p.m. 57th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference Hon. Members, I also wish to inform you that the Speaker of the National Assembly, yours truly the Deputy Speaker, Ms. Bibi Shadick, the Rev. Dr. Kwame Gilbert and Mr. Sherlock Isaacs will 1 be attending the 57th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference which is being held in London, UK, from 21st to 28th July, 2011. The Speaker has left this morning and the rest of the delegation will be leaving on Saturday 23rd July, 2011. I will therefore, as you see, be presiding at today’s sitting.
  • India Guyana Bilateral Relation

    India Guyana Bilateral Relation

    India-Guyana Bilateral Relations During the colonial period, Guyana's economy was focused on plantation agriculture, which initially depended on slave labour. Guyana saw major slave rebellions in 1763 and again in 1823.Great Britain passed the Slavery Abolition Act in British Parliament that abolished slavery in most British colonies, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa. British Guiana became a Crown colony in 1928, and in 1953 it was granted home rule. In 1950, Mr. Cheddi Jagan, who was Indian-Guyanese, and Mr. Forbes Burnham, who was Afro-Guyanese, created the colony's first political party, the Progressive People's Party (PPP), which was dedicated to gaining the colony's independence. In the 1953 elections, Mr. Cheddi Jagan was elected chief minister. Mr. Cheddi Jagan of the PPP and Mr. Forbes Burnham of the PNC were to dominate Guyana politics for decades to come. In 1961, Britain granted the colony autonomy, and Mr. Cheddi Jagan became Prime Minister (1961–1964). In 1964, Burnham succeeded Jagan as Prime Minister, a position he retained after the country gained full independence on May 26, 1966. With independence, the country returned to its traditional name, Guyana. Mr. Burnham ruled Guyana until his death in 1985 (from 1980 to 1985, after a change in the constitution, he served as president). Mr. Desmond Hoyte of the PNC became president in 1985, but in 1992 the PPP reemerged, winning a majority in the general election. Mr. Cheddi Jagan became President, and succeeded in reviving the economy. After his death in 1997, his wife, Janet Jagan, was elected President.
  • NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 54 WHEREAS President

    NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 54 WHEREAS President

    • NINTH PARLIAMENT OF GUYNA FIRST SESSION (2006-2008) NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 54 WHEREAS President Bharrat Jagdeo met on February 19 and 20 with a broad cross-section of representatives from the religious community, business sector, the labour io movement, women, Amerindian, and other civil society bodies to discuss the recent escalation of crime, and from that engagement a joint statement was issued which called for: "1. Commit their full and unqualified support of the joint services in confronting crime in our country and in securing the safety of our citizens under the law, and; 2. Work in collaboration with the Government and all of the parliamentary political parties to jointly review the national security plan for its urgent and comprehensive implementation with the ultimate goal of cementing inclusive democracy, peace and justice in our country; 3. Initiate and support confidence building measures in the society at large 4. and amongst communities and organizations, in order to continue to move the country forward; 4. Call on all political parties to seek in good faith a unified position on law and order and public safety." (A copy attached at Appendix A); /...2 AND WHEREAS President Jagdeo also met on February 19 with the leaders of the five parliamentary political parties to discuss the current crime situation, and following that meeting a joint statement was issued calling for: "1. Unequivocally condemn crime in all its forms especially the recent Lusignan and Bartica massacres; 2. Commit to work together in support of the Joint Services as they fight crime professionally and within the confines of the law; 3.
  • Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on The

    Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on The

    Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the Application filed before the International Court of Justice by the Cooperative of Guyana on March 29th, 2018 ANNEX Table of Contents I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and process of decolonization of the British Guyana, 1961-1965 ................................................................... 3 II. London Conference, December 9th-10th, 1965………………………15 III. Geneva Conference, February 16th-17th, 1966………………………20 IV. Intervention of Minister Iribarren Borges on the Geneva Agreement at the National Congress, March 17th, 1966……………………………25 V. The recognition of Guyana by Venezuela, May 1966 ........................ 37 VI. Mixed Commission, 1966-1970 .......................................................... 41 VII. The Protocol of Port of Spain, 1970-1982 .......................................... 49 VIII. Reactivation of the Geneva Agreement: election of means of settlement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 1982-198371 IX. The choice of Good Offices, 1983-1989 ............................................. 83 X. The process of Good Offices, 1989-2014 ........................................... 87 XI. Work Plan Proposal: Process of good offices in the border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela, 2013 ............................................. 116 XII. Events leading to the communiqué of the UN Secretary-General of January 30th, 2018 (2014-2018) ....................................................... 118 2 I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and Process of decolonization
  • Leadership and Policy Studies Global Leaders: Defining

    Leadership and Policy Studies Global Leaders: Defining

    LEADERSHIP AND POLICY STUDIES GLOBAL LEADERS: DEFINING RELEVANT LEADERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY BRADLEY STEVEN GRAY Dissertation under the direction of Professor Robert L. Crowson After an age of leadership defined by the norms and demands of an industrial era, the forces of globalization at the beginning of the 21st century, primarily ushered in by logarithmic advances of technology, have created the demand for leadership, identified in this phenomenological study as “global leadership.” Based upon demand identifiers describing the realities of the current stage(s) of globalization–bypass, simultaneity, mobility, pluralism, change, and integration–six leadership capacities were extrapolated to establish criteria upon which to analyze an effective leader in this context. Foundational is a distinction between “competencies” and “capacities” in global leadership. Where competencies are skill and task based with limited ability to fulfill adaptive work, capacities are skills and abilities that enable one to regenerate growth based on adaptive challenges, and thus innovation. The six global leader capacities forming the filter for analysis are the capacity for self-transformation, capacity of the contextual self, capacity for omnicompetence, capacity for reframing the gifts of leadership, capacity for ethnorelativism, and the capacity for transcendence. In the case of the global leader, these six capacities engage simultaneously to create the synergistic phenomenon. Two archetypal cases are considered. Findings identify that global leaders are found throughout societies although few of them are noticed because the infrastructure of leadership development, including the education systems, are geared to develop leaders for industrial model work. Global leaders are not necessarily international leaders, and it is not a contradiction for a global leader not to lead in an international context.
  • Report of the Commission of Inquiry Appointed to Inquire And

    Report of the Commission of Inquiry Appointed to Inquire And

    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY APPOINTED TO ENQUIRE AND REPORT ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE DEATH IN AN EXPLOSION OF THE LATE DR. WALTER RODNEY ON THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY AT GEORETOWN VOLUME 1: REPORT AND APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2016 Transmittal Letter Chapter 6 Contents Chapter 7 Table of Contents Chapter 8 Chapter 1 Chapter 9 Chapter 2 Tendered Exhibits Chapter 3 Procedural Rules Chapter 4 Correspondence Chapter 5 Editorial Note 1 2 Transmittal of Report of the Commission of Inquiry to enquire into and report on the circumstances surrounding the death in an explosion of the late Dr. Walter Rodney on the thirteenth day of June one thousand nine hundred and eighty at Georgetown To His Excellency David A. Granger President of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana Your Excellency, In my capacity as Chairman of the Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry, I have the honour to submit the Report of the Inquiry to which the President appointed us by Instrument dated 8th February, 2014. The Commissioners were, in the Instrument of Appointment, expected to submit their Report within ten (10) weeks from the start of the Commission. The Commission started its work on 28th April, 2014. As we understand it, the premise informing the early submission date was that the Commission coming thirty-four (34) years after the death of Dr. Walter Rodney and the events surrounding that event, would, in all probability, be supported by only a few persons volunteering to give evidence and/or having an interest in this matter.
  • EIU Report Oct 2010

    EIU Report Oct 2010

    Country Report Guyana October 2010 Economist Intelligence Unit 26 Red Lion Square London WC1R 4HQ United Kingdom Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Economist Intelligence Unit Economist Intelligence Unit 26 Red Lion Square The Economist Group London 750 Third Avenue WC1R 4HQ 5th Floor United Kingdom New York, NY 10017, US Tel: (44.20) 7576 8000 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Fax: (44.20) 7576 8500 Fax: (1.212) 586 0248 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong Geneva Economist Intelligence Unit Economist Intelligence Unit 60/F, Central Plaza Boulevard des Tranchées 16 18 Harbour Road 1206 Geneva Wanchai Switzerland Hong Kong Tel: (852) 2585 3888 Tel: (41) 22 566 2470 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report can be accessed electronically as soon as it is published by visiting store.eiu.com or by contacting a local sales representative. The whole report may be viewed in PDF format, or can be navigated section-by-section by using the HTML links.
  • Can Justify Walter Rodney's Assassination? Rohit Kanhai Caribbean Daylight

    Can Justify Walter Rodney's Assassination? Rohit Kanhai Caribbean Daylight

    Groundings Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 12 December 2015 What "Context" Can Justify Walter Rodney's Assassination? Rohit Kanhai Caribbean Daylight Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings Part of the African Studies Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, International Relations Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kanhai, Rohit (2015) "What "Context" Can Justify Walter Rodney's Assassination?," Groundings: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 12. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings/vol2/iss2/12 This Walter Rodney Remembered is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Groundings by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Groundings (2015) 2(2) : Page 25 What “Context” Can Justify Walter Rodney’s Assassination? Rohit Kanhai Rohit Kanhai is Editor of Caribbean Daylight, a New York-based Caribbean newspaper. Rohit Kanhai provided expert testimony at the Rodney Commission of Inquiry regarding the bomb apparatus that was used to assassinate Dr. Walter Rodney on 13 June 1980. Context! Context! Context! Like water crashing over the seawalls, there has been a rush of explanations, based on “context” to justify the shifting political sands, as it swirls with the waves. The “sands of time” seems to have shifted the “line in the sand” so much so, that all commonsense seems to have deserted the land of Guyana. In the midst of this debate are Walter Rodney and the Working People’s Alliance (WPA).
  • Questionnaire

    Questionnaire

    The Political Culture of Democracy in Guyana: 2006 Annex B: Questionnaire Version # 23 IRB Approval: 060187 UNIVERSITY OF GUYANA The Political Culture of Democracy: Guyana, 2006 © Vanderbilt University 2006. All rights reserved. Country: 1. Mexico 2. Guatemala 3. El Salvador 4. Honduras 5. Nicaragua 6. Costa Rica 7. Panama 8. Colombia 9. Ecuador 10. Bolivia 11. Peru 12. Paraguay COUNTRY 24 13. Chile 14. Uruguay 15. Brazil. 21. Dominican Republic 22. Haiti 23. Jamaica 24.Guyana 25. Trinidad IDNUM. Questionnaire number [assigned at the office] IDNUM Estratopri: 2401. Greater Georgetown 2402. Region 3 and rest of region 4 Estratopri: 24 2403. Region 2, 5, and 6 2404. Region 10 2405. Region 1, 7, 8, and 9 PSU (Electoral Division)_______________________ PSU Regions : 1. Barima/Waini 5. Mahaica/West Berbice 2. Pomeroon/Supenaam 6. East Berbice/Corentyne GUYREGION 3. West Demerara/Essequibo Island 9. Upper Takatu/UpperEssequibo 4. Demerara/Mahaica 10. Upper Demerara/Berbice Municipalities: 1. Georgetown 5. Rose Hall 2. Suburbs of Georgetown 6. Corriverton GUYMUNICIPALITY 3. Ana Regina 7. Linden 4. New Amsterdam 8. Rural areas [CLUSTER or Electoral Division]: _______________________________ Cluster [A cluster cannot be larger than 8 interviews in urban towns, and 12 in rural areas] UR 1. Urban 2. Rural UR Area Size: 1. National Capital (Metropolitan area) 2. Large City 3. Medium City 4. Small City 5. Rural Area SIZE Questionnaire language: (1) English GUYIDIOMA [IDIOMAQ] Start time: _____:_____ [Don’t enter] ---------- Date Day: ____ Month:_______ Year: 2006 DATE NOTE: IT IS COMPULSORY TO READ THE STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT BEFORE STARTING THE INTERVIEW.
  • A PARTNERSHIP for NATIONAL UNITY + ALLIANCE for CHANGE COALITION MANIFESTO ELECTIONS 2015 Contents

    A PARTNERSHIP for NATIONAL UNITY + ALLIANCE for CHANGE COALITION MANIFESTO ELECTIONS 2015 Contents

    A PARTNERSHIP FOR NATIONAL UNITY + ALLIANCE FOR CHANGE COALITION MANIFESTO ELECTIONS 2015 CONTENTS MESSAGES ........................................................................................ 4 APNU+AFC ACTION PROGRAMME FOR THE FIRST 100 DAYS .................................... 8 HEALING, RECONCILIATION AND A MODERN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY .......................... 9 1. PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COALITION ......................................... 10 2. DIAGNOSIS ................................................................................... 11 3. GOOD GOVERNANCE ........................................................................ 14 2 APNU+AFC CONTENTS 4. EMPLOYMENT MAXIMISATION, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY REDUCTION .................. 22 5. PRODUCTION TRANSFORMATION AND ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION ..................... 26 6. SOCIAL INTEGRATION, HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND YOUTH ................................... 34 7. CRIME REDUCTION, PERSONAL, PUBLIC AND TERRITORIAL SECURITY ...................... 44 ANNEX ........................................................................................... 47 MANIFESTO 3 MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ONE NATION The record rates of arson, armed robbery, murders, suicides, road fatalities, illiteracy, unemployment, The principal objective of this Manifesto is to lay trafficking in persons and trafficking in narcotics have the foundation for establishing a government of made our country a pariah state in this hemisphere. national unity and democratic renewal as our country Happy people
  • OEA/Ser.G CP/Doc.3520/01 1Er Octobre 2001 Original:Espagnol/Anglais

    OEA/Ser.G CP/Doc.3520/01 1Er Octobre 2001 Original:Espagnol/Anglais

    OEA/Ser.G CP/doc.3520/01 1er octobre 2001 Original:espagnol/anglais RAPPORT DE LA MISSION D’OBSERVATION DES ELECTIONS AU GUYANA 2001 Ce document est distribué aux Missions permanentes et sera présenté au Conseil permanent de l’Organisation SG/UPD-682/01 27 septembre 2001 Monsieur le Président, J'ai l'honneur de vous faire parvenir sous ce couvert le rapport de la Mission d'observation des élections générales qui se sont déroulées au Guyana le 19 mars 2001, en vous demandant de bien vouloir le faire distribuer aux membres du Conseil permanent. Je saisis cette occasion pour vous renouveler, Monsieur le Président, les assurances de ma très haute considération. César Gaviria Secrétaire général Son Excellence Monsieur l’Ambassadeur Hernán R. Castro Hernández Représentant permanent du Costa Rica Président du Conseil permanent de l'Organisation des Etats Américains Washington, D.C. ORGANISATION DES ETATS AMERICAINS RAPPORT MISSION D’OBSERVATION DES ELECTIONS AU GUYANA 2001 Unité pour la promotion de la démocratieTABLE DES MATIERES Page Remerciements .....................................................................................................ix Introduction..........................................................................................................xi CHAPITRE I. CONTEXTE PRE-ELECTORAL .......................................................... 1 A. Rapport EOM 1997 ..................................................................... 1 B. Situation après les élections en 1997............................................. 2
  • Guyana: Minority Government's Difficult Choices

    Guyana: Minority Government's Difficult Choices

    Second Quarter 2012 www.global-briefing.org Guyana: Minority government’s difficult choices Sir Ronald Sanders The combined opposition parties’ power to outvote Guyana’s new government on crucial issues has created an unprecedented challenge to the politicians, who are now faced with a choice between finding a compromise and returning to the electorate for a new mandate. Thanks to Guyana’s unique constitution, President Donald Ramotar was elected to office on 28 November 2011 as leader of the largest party, even though it holds only a minority of seats in the National Assembly. And as a consequence, the combined opposition has been flexing its muscles in questioning every aspect of government spending. Political observers predict that the president’s minority administration will be forced to hold fresh elections soon or else face the likelihood of the opposition-controlled National Assembly rejecting the budget and paralysing all government activity. Guyana’s complex constitution, revised in 1980, provides for an electoral system of proportional representation under which the country is divided into ten regions returning 25 members of the National Assembly with another 40 seats being allocated nationally on the proportion of votes cast for each party. To control the assembly – which makes the laws of the country and initiates its money bills, including the budget – a party must secure more than 50 percent of the ballots. At the same time, according to the constitution, the president, in whom executive authority lies, only requires a plurality of the votes to be elected. Since his People’s Progressive Party/ Civic (PPP/C) received the highest number of votes cast for a single party (48.7 percent), Ramotar was elected president even though the PPP/C, as a party, does not control the National Assembly.