DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Thesis of Xuetao Shi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CHIMICA CHIMICA INDUSTRIALE E SCIENZA DEI MATERIALI Ph.D. Thesis Filler Toughening of Plastics: Study of the Deformation Mechanism XUETAO SHI Supervisor: Prof. Andrea Lazzeri Ph.D. candidate in Ingegneria "Leonardo da Vinci" - Ingegneria chimica e dei materiali (SSD ING-IND/22) ххш cycle 2008-2010 Abstract Abstract Precipitated calcium carbonate nanoparticles (PCC), surface treated with stearin in aqueous medium, were investigated in this thesis as rigid fillers for polymer toughening. The surface characterization of a series of PCC coated with different stearin amount indicated the presence of two different types of calcium alkanoate layers on the surface. One is the chemisorbed monolayer (CSM) bonded to the active sites of PCC surface with a maximum coverage degree of around 72%. The other one is constituted by the physisorbed calcium alkanoate multilayers linked to the CSM by weak intermolecular forces. The micelle adsorption mechanism has been proposed to be the dominating process due to the limited solubility of stearin in water, compared to the coating process in solvent where a full monolayer can be achieved. The calcium alkanoate molecules, present on the PCC surface as physisorbed multilayers, have been shown to have a complicated thermal behavior. The drying process for PCC particles resulted in molecular rearrangement from the monohydrate α phase to the anhydrous β′ phase. Molecular polymorphism and orientation of calcium alkanoate on the PCC surface are strongly connected with the surface free energy of the coated particles. The coated PCC particles showed a continuously decreasing surface free energy, both for the dispersion and specific components, with an increase in the amount of surface coating. Based on the investigation of the thermal transition and the determination of surface layer thickness, a molecular arrangement model has been proposed suggesting that the CSM is vertical to the PCC surface linked tail-to-tail with the physisorbed multilayers with alkyl chains oriented outwards. This series of coated PCC nanoparticles were then applied to high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and polylactic acid (PLA) as toughening fillers. The HDPE/PCC nanocomposites achieved the expected balance between the stiffness and toughness. In fact, the yield stress showed a slightly decreasing trend while the impact strength showed a increasing tendency when the surface coating amount on the PCC surface increased. Those mechanical properties were related to the micromorphology and also to the interfacial adhesion between PCC particles and HDPE polymer matrix, which on the other hand connected to the dependence of the surface free energy from the surface coating amount of PCC fillers. i Abstract PLA/PCC nanocomposites showed a notable improvement of the elongation-at-break and toughness compared to that of pure PLA. This result can be attributed to both the weaker interfacial adhesion facilitating the debonding process and the plasticizing effect of calcium alkanoate which enhance the deformability of PLA nanocomposites. In fact, the thermal behavior study elucidated that PCC particles acted as nucleating agents for PLA, decreasing the crystallization half-time and the cold crystallization temperature of PLA composites. Also the plasticizing effect of the calcium alkanoate coated PCC nanoparticles was confirmed by the decreased glass transition temperature for PLA/PCC nanocomposites. ii Contents Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... i Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Rubber toughened plastics ....................................................................................................2 1.2 Filler toughened plastics .......................................................................................................9 1.3 Mechanical properties of particulate polymer system .........................................................13 1.4 Surface treatment and characterization ...............................................................................19 1.5 Outline of this thesis ............................................................................................................21 Chapter 2 Materials and Experiments .................................................................................... 24 2.1 Surface characterization of PCC nanoparticles .........................................................................24 2.1.1 Materials .............................................................................................................................24 2.1.2 Preparation of precipitated calcium carbonate ...................................................................25 2.1.3 FTIR ...................................................................................................................................26 2.1.4 BET.....................................................................................................................................27 2.1.5 Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) ..................................................................................27 2.1.6 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) ............................................................................27 2.1.7 Dissolution method .............................................................................................................28 2.1.8 Preparation of calcium alkanoate monohydrate .................................................................29 2.1.9 X-ray diffraction (XRD) .....................................................................................................30 2.1.10 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) .........................................................................30 2.1.11 Inverse gas chromatograph ...............................................................................................31 2.2 Surface characterization of Polymer/PCC composites ..............................................................31 2.2.1 Materials for polymer nanocomposites ..............................................................................31 2.2.2 Preparation of polymer composites ....................................................................................32 2.2.3 Mechanical measurements ..................................................................................................34 2.2.4 Thermal behavior ................................................................................................................35 2.2.5 Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) ................................................................35 2.2.6 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ................................................................................35 Chapter 3 Surface characterization of coated PCC particles with stearin in water medium . 36 3.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................36 3.2 Surface organic molecular structure ..........................................................................................38 3.2.1 FTIR ...................................................................................................................................38 3.2.2 TGA ....................................................................................................................................41 3.3 Surface coating composition .....................................................................................................44 3.3.1 DSC measurements ............................................................................................................44 I Contents 3.3.2 Dissolution method .............................................................................................................50 3.4 Adsorption process of stearate on the PCC surface ..................................................................54 3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................60 Chapter 4 Surface coating molecular arrangement and surface free energy determination .. 61 4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................61 4.2 Phase transition .........................................................................................................................64 4.2.1 DSC measurement ..............................................................................................................65 4.2.2 XRD measurement .............................................................................................................67 4.3 Coating molecular arrangement ................................................................................................70 4.3.1 Interlayer distance of coating molecules on PCC ...............................................................70 4.3.2 Layer thickness determination of coating molecules ..........................................................71 4.4 Surface free energy ...................................................................................................................75 4.4.1 IGC theory background ......................................................................................................76
Recommended publications
  • Calcium Stearate Processing

    Calcium Stearate Processing

    National Organic Standards Board Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) Review Compiled by University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (UC SAREP) for the USDA National Organic Program Calcium Stearate Processing Executive Summary1 A petition is under consideration with respect to NOP regulations subpart G §205.605, governing the use of substances in processed products: Petitioned: Inclusion of calcium stearate on National List of nonagricultural substances allowed in or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).” Calcium stearate is a compound of calcium with a mixture of solid organic acids obtained from edible sources. It is generally used as a solid-phase lubricant that reduces friction between particles of the substance to which it is added. The Petitioner’s intended use is “as a flow agent (anti-dusting agent)” to be used in dry flour based ingredients sold to bakeries (NOSB Petition). The NOP has no prior listing or ruling on the substance. All three reviewers agreed that the substance should be considered synthetic. The reviewers were divided over the use of calcium stearate in food labeled as “organic.” Two of the reviewers felt it should not be allowed in these foods, while one reviewer felt it should be accepted. One reviewer who voted to restrict its use indicated that more information was needed on the nature of the substance and its potential applications, and the other reviewer felt that inclusion of a “synthetic” substance in organics runs contrary to consumer’s expectations regarding organic products. All three reviewers agreed that the substance should be allowed in products labeled as “made with organic…” ingredients.
  • Magnesium Stearate

    Magnesium Stearate

    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service | National Organic Program Document Cover Sheet https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/national-list/petitioned Document Type: ☐ National List Petition or Petition Update A petition is a request to amend the USDA National Organic Program’s National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List). Any person may submit a petition to have a substance evaluated by the National Organic Standards Board (7 CFR 205.607(a)). Guidelines for submitting a petition are available in the NOP Handbook as NOP 3011, National List Petition Guidelines. Petitions are posted for the public on the NOP website for Petitioned Substances. ☒ Technical Report A technical report is developed in response to a petition to amend the National List. Reports are also developed to assist in the review of substances that are already on the National List. Technical reports are completed by third-party contractors and are available to the public on the NOP website for Petitioned Substances. Contractor names and dates completed are available in the report. Magnesium Stearate Handling/Processing 1 2 Identification of Petitioned Substance 13 3 Chemical Names: 14 Trade Names: 4 Magnesium stearate 15 N/A 5 Octadecanoic acid magnesium salt 6 Magnesium octadecanoate CAS Numbers: 7 557-04-0 8 Other Name: 9 Stearic acid magnesium salt 10 Magnesium distearate Other Codes: 11 EC-No. 209-150-3 12 INS No. 470(iii) 16 17 Summary of Petitioned Use 18 Magnesium stearate is used as a lubricant or anticaking agent in food processing and handling. Magnesium 19 stearate is currently listed on the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances as a synthetic 20 nonagricultural (nonorganic) substance allowed as ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic” 21 or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s))” (7 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 205.605(b)).
  • Lubricants in Pharmaceutical Solid Dosage Forms

    Lubricants in Pharmaceutical Solid Dosage Forms

    Lubricants 2014, 2, 21-43; doi:10.3390/lubricants2010021 OPEN ACCESS lubricants ISSN 2075-4442 www.mdpi.com/journal/lubricants Review Lubricants in Pharmaceutical Solid Dosage Forms Jinjiang Li * and Yongmei Wu Drug Product Science & Technology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Corporation, 1 Squibb Dr., New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-732-227-6584; Fax: +1-732-227-3784. Received: 18 December 2013; in revised form: 21 January 2014 / Accepted: 24 January 2014 / Published: 25 February 2014 Abstract: Lubrication plays a key role in successful manufacturing of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms; lubricants are essential ingredients in robust formulations to achieve this. Although many failures in pharmaceutical manufacturing operations are caused by issues related to lubrication, in general, lubricants do not gain adequate attention in the development of pharmaceutical formulations. In this paper, the fundamental background on lubrication is introduced, in which the relationships between lubrication and friction/adhesion forces are discussed. Then, the application of lubrication in the development of pharmaceutical products and manufacturing processes is discussed with an emphasis on magnesium stearate. In particular, the effect of its hydration state (anhydrate, monohydrate, dihydrate, and trihydrate) and its powder characteristics on lubrication efficiency, as well as product and process performance is summarized. In addition, the impact of lubrication on the dynamics of compaction/compression processes and on the mechanical properties of compacts/tablets is presented. Furthermore, the online monitoring of magnesium stearate in a blending process is briefly mentioned. Finally, the chemical compatibility of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with magnesium stearate and its reactive impurities is reviewed with examples from the literature illustrating the various reaction mechanisms involved.
  • Thai Hotel a Na Na Na Umri Han Atau Mitte

    Thai Hotel a Na Na Na Umri Han Atau Mitte

    THAI HOTELA NA NAUS009809538B2NA UMRI HAN ATAU MITTE (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,809 ,538 B2 Musa et al. (45 ) Date of Patent: Nov . 7 , 2017 ( 54 ) RENEWABLE MODIFIED NATURAL Merriam -Webster , Definition for synthesis , obtained from http :/ / COMPOUNDS www .merriam -webster . com /dictionary / synthesis on Mar . 18 , 2016 . * ( 75 ) Inventors: Osama M . Musa , Kinnelon , NJ (US ) ; Smith , Janice G . Organic Chemistry . 1st ed . New York , NY : Ezat Khosravi, Gilesgate Moor (GB ) McGraw - Hill, 2006 , Chapter 7 , pp . 221- 269. * Thompson et al . Polymer Journal 1995 , 27 , 325 - 338 . * ( 73 ) Assignee : ISP INVESTMENTS LLC , Barluenga et al. Org. Lett . 2002, 4 , 2817 - 2819 . * Wilmington , DE (US ) International Search Report , PCT /US2011 / 045208 , published on Feb . 9 , 2012 ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 * cited by examiner U . S . C . 154 (b ) by 977 days . Primary Examiner — Matthew Coughlin (74 ) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Thompson Hine LLP ; (21 ) Appl . No. : 13/ 811 , 561 William J. Davis (22 ) PCT Filed : Jul. 25, 2011 (57 ) ABSTRACT ( 86 ) PCT No .: PCT/ US2011 /045208 Provided are modified natural compounds that are produced , at least in part , from ( A ) at least one epoxidized and /or $ 371 ( c ) ( 1 ) , maleated natural fatty acid , or epoxidized and /or maleated ( 2 ) , ( 4 ) Date : Mar. 25 , 2013 natural oil, and ( B ) at least one lactam having at least one ( 87) PCT Pub . No. : W02012 /018588 hydroxyl functional group , wherein the lactam may be in a blend with one or more optional alcohol( s ) . Among other PCT Pub .
  • “Inert” Ingredients Used in Organic Production

    “Inert” Ingredients Used in Organic Production

    “Inert” Ingredients Used in Organic Production Terry Shistar, PhD A Beyond Pesticides Report he relatively few registered pesticides allowed in organic production are contained in product formulations with so-called “inert” ingredients that are not disclosed on the T product label. The “inerts” make up the powder, liquid, granule, or spreader/sticking agents in pesticide formulations. The “inerts” are typically included in products with natural or synthetic active pesticide ingredients recommended by the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) and listed by the National Organic Program (NOP) on the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances. Any of the pesticides that meet the standards of public health and environmental protection and organic compatibility in the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA) may contain “inert” ingredients. Because the standards of OFPA are different from those used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate pesticides and given changes in how the agency categorizes inerts, the NOSB has adopted a series of recommendations since 2010 that established a substance review process as part of the sunset review. NOP has not followed through on the Board’s recommendations and, as a result, there are numerous materials in use that have not been subject to OFPA criteria. This report (i) traces the history of the legal requirements for review by the NOSB, (ii) identifies the universe of toxic and nontoxic materials that make of the category of “inerts” used in products permitted in organic production, and (iii) suggests a path forward to ensure NOSB compliance with OFPA and uphold the integrity of the USDA organic label.
  • Human Health (PDF)

    Human Health (PDF)

    Human & Environmental Risk Assessment on ingredients of European household cleaning products Fatty Acid Salts Human Health Risk Assessment Draft for Public Comment June, 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used, reproduced, copied, stored or transmitted in any form of by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the HERA Substance Team or the involved company. The content of this document has been prepared and reviewed by experts on behalf of HERA with all possible care and from the available scientific information. It is provided for information only. HERA cannot accept any responsibility or liability and does not provide a warranty for any use or interpretation of the material contained in this publication. HERA Targeted Risk Assessment of Fatty Acids Salts, June 2002 Contents 2. Executive Summary ____________________________________________________ 3 3. Substance Characterisation ______________________________________________ 4 3.1. CAS No and Grouping information 4 3.2. Chemical structure and composition 4 3.3 Manufacturing Route and Production/Volume Statistics 6 3.4. Use applications summary 6 5. Human Health Assessment_______________________________________________ 8 5.1 Consumer Exposure 8 5.1.1 Product types ____________________________________________________________________ 8 5.1.2 Consumer Contact Scenarios ________________________________________________________ 8 5.1.3 Consumer contact estimates_________________________________________________________
  • Chapter 5 Carboxylic Acids and Esters

    Chapter 5 Carboxylic Acids and Esters

    Chapter 5 Carboxylic Acids and Esters Chapter 5 Carboxylic Acids and Esters Chapter Objectives: • Learn to recognize the carboxylic acid, ester, and related functional groups. • Learn the IUPAC system for naming carboxylic acids and esters. • Learn the important physical properties of the carboxylic acids and esters. • Learn the major chemical reaction of carboxylic acids and esters, and learn how to predict the products of ester synthesis and hydrolysis reactions. • Learn some of the important properties of condensation polymers, especially the polyesters. Mr. Kevin A. Boudreaux Angelo State University CHEM 2353 Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry Organic and Biochemistry for Today (Seager & Slabaugh) www.angelo.edu/faculty/kboudrea Carboxylic Acids • Carboxylic acids are weak organic acids which contain the carboxyl group (RCO2H): O C O H O RCOOH RCO2H O condensed ways of RCOH writing the carboxyl group a carboxylic acid C H O the carboxyl group • The tart flavor of sour-tasting foods is often caused by the presence of carboxylic acids. 2 Chapter 5 Carboxylic Acids and Esters Nomenclature of Carboxylic Acids 3 Nomenclature of Carboxylic Acids • Select the longest carbon chain containing the carboxyl group. The -e ending of the parent alkane name is replaced by the suffix -oic acid. • The carboxyl carbon is always numbered “1” but the number is not included in the name. • Name the substituents attached to the chain in the usual way. • Aromatic carboxylic acids (i.e., with a CO2H directly connected to a benzene ring) are named after the

  • Safety Assessment of Fatty Acids & Soaps As Used in Cosmetics

    Safety Assessment of Fatty Acids & Soaps as Used in Cosmetics Status: Scientific Literature Review for Public Comment Release Date: October 2, 2018 Panel Meeting Date: December 3-4, 2018 All interested persons are provided 60 days from the above date to comment on this safety assessment and to identify additional published data that should be included or provide unpublished data which can be made public and included. Information may be submitted without identifying the source or the trade name of the cosmetic product containing the ingredient. All unpublished data submitted to CIR will be discussed in open meetings, will be available at the CIR office for review by any interested party and may be cited in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Please submit data, comments, or requests to the CIR Executive Director, Dr. Bart Heldreth. The 2018 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Executive Director is Bart Heldreth, Ph.D. This safety assessment was prepared by Christina L. Burnett, Senior Scientific Analyst/Writer. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1620 L St NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20036-4702 ph 202.331.0651 fax 202.331.0088 [email protected] INTRODUCTION Most of the fatty acids and soaps (i.e. fatty acid salts) detailed in this safety assessment are reported to function as anticaking agents, emulsion stabilizers, viscosity increasing agents, opacifying agents, and surfactants, according to the web- based International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook (wINCI; Dictionary; see Table 1).1 Additional functions included hair and skin conditioning agents, binders, slip modifier, antioxidants, fragrance ingredients, colorants, skin protectants, cosmetic biocide, and film formers.
  • Technical Information

    Technical Information

    TECHNICAL INFORMATION Influence of Different Lubricants on Tableting Characteristics and Dissolution Behavior Sonja Bauhuber, Maria Launer, Gernot Warnke Abstract microcrystalline cellulose) - and were then compacted on a rotary tablet press. For the dissolution studies, water was chosen as the Apart from their desired effect of reducing the ejection force and dissolution medium to avoid any influences of salts or pH on the punch adhesion, lubricants also have a considerable influence on dissolution properties of the resulting tablets. the tablet hardness, disintegration, and dissolution times due to their inherent hydrophobicity. This study aimed to investigate the Materials and Methods influence of the lubricant molecular structure on the aforemen- tioned characteristics. For this purpose, active pharmaceutical All powder blends were prepared using a free fall blender. First, ingredients (APIs) with high and low water solubility have been the API was blended withPROSOLV® SMCC HD 90 for 15 minutes. evaluated in combination with 4 different, stearyl-based lubri- Afterwards, the sieved lubricant was added and the mixture was cants. The study showed that the molecular structure of the lubri- blended for another 3 minutes. This blend was then transferred cant had a significant influence on all of the above mentioned to the tablet press and compressed immediately. Compression tablet characteristics. A good molecular balance between hydro- profiles for the different blends have been recorded. Tablet hard- phobic and slightly hydrophilic moieties - as obtained for sodium ness was tested directly after compression, while disintegration stearyl fumarate (PRUV ® ) - resulted in the best overall outcome. as well as dissolution time was tested after one day. For the dissolution testing, the medium water was tempered to Introduction 37 °C.
  • Sodium Stearate

    Sodium Stearate

    SAFETY DATA SHEET Sodium Stearate SECTION 1 - PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION 1.1 Product identifier Product Name: Sodium Stearate Product Code(s): Sodium Stearate Synonym(s): Octadecanoic acid, sodium salt; Sodium octadecanoate; Stearic acid, sodium salt REACH Registration Number: No data available 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against General use: For use in industrial and laboratory applications Uses advised against: None known 1.3 Details of the supplier and of the safety data sheet Manufacturer/Distributor Allan Chemical Corporation 235 Margaret King Avenue Ringwood, NJ 07456 USA +1-973-962-4014 1.4 Emergency telephone number Chem Tel +1-813-248-0585 +1-800-255-3924 SECTION 2 - HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Classification of substance or mixture Product definition: Substance Classification in accordance with 29 CFR 1910 (OSHA HCS) and Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 Not a dangerous substance according to OSHA or to European Union Legislation 2.2 Label Elements Not classified as dangerous according to GHS 2.3 Hazards not otherwise classified (HNOC) or not covered by GHS May form combustible dust concentrations in air SECTION 3 - COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS 3.1 Substances % by Weight Ingredient CAS Number EC Number Index Number GHS Classification >99 Sodium Stearate 822-16-2 212-490-5 ------------ ------------ There are no additional ingredients present which, within the current knowledge of the supplier and in the concentrations applicable, are classified as hazardous to health or the environment and hence, require reporting in this section. 3.2 Mixtures Not applicable SECTION 4 - FIRST AID MEASURES 4.1 Description of first aid measures Inhalation: If exposure to product mist causes respiratory irritation or distress, move the exposed person to fresh air immediately.
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0220832 A1 Walton (43) Pub

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0220832 A1 Walton (43) Pub

    US 2005O220832A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0220832 A1 Walton (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 6, 2005 (54) GELS CONTAINING METALLIC SOAPS AND Publication Classification COUPLNGAGENTS (51) Int. Cl." ....................................................... A61K 7/32 (76) Inventor: Richard Walton, Simpsonville, SC (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/401 (US) Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT Isaac A. Angres Suite 301 The present invention provides an enhanced gelling agent 2001 Jefferson Davis Highway composition comprising a mixture of a metallic Soap and a Arlington, VA 22202 (US) coupling agent. The invention also describes compositions (21) Appl. No.: 11/087,570 in gel form comprising: (a) a Solvent Selected from the group consisting of polar Solvents, non-polar Solvents and combi (22) Filed: Mar. 24, 2005 nations thereof, and (b) a gelling agent in an amount Sufficient to impart gelation to the composition, the gelling Related U.S. Application Data agent being a mixture comprising a metallic Soap and a coupling agent. The gels of the invention may be Substan (60) Provisional application No. 60/556,052, filed on Mar. tially anhydrous or may optionally contain water as part of 25, 2004. the formulation. US 2005/0220832 A1 Oct. 6, 2005 GELS CONTAINING METALLIC SOAPS AND diffusion of the product to the local treatment area, to COUPLING AGENTS distribute the product uniformly over the local treatment area, or to be able to use the product in amounts that are 0001. This application claims the priority benefit under Sufficient to obtain the desired cosmetic or dermatological 35 U.S.C. section 119 of U.S.
  • United States Patent Office Patented (Oct

    United States Patent Office Patented (Oct

    3,056,819 United States Patent Office Patented (Oct. 2, 1962 1. 2 contain aluminium in ratios over 2:1 are manufactured 3,056,819 only by the method of the present invention, so they are ALUMNIUMSOAPS AND THER PRODUCTION new compounds, and consequently a part of the present Hideo Tanabe, Nishinomiya, Japan, assignor to Takeda invention also relates to those kinds of aluminium soap Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan which contain aluminium in ratios over 2:1. No Drawing. Fied Dec. 16, 1958, Ser. No. 780,687 Basic aluminium salts used in the method of the pres Claims priority, application Japan Dec. 21, 1957 ent invention are prepared profitably by the following 18 Claims. (C. 260-414) methods: (1) an amount more than equivalent of metallic This invention relates to a method for preparing alu aluminium is reacted with an inorganic acid in water, minium soap and to new aluminium compounds of fatty O (2) an amount more than equivalent of aluminium hy acids. droxide is reacted with an inorganic acid in water, (3) Aluminium soap is the general name of aluminium an amount less than equivalent of alkali is reacted with compounds of higher fatty acids and its composition may an aqueous solution of an aluminium salt, (4) an aque be represented by Al (RCOO)3, the corresponding fatty ous solution of an aluminium salt is passed through an acids being of the formula RCOOH. In fact, however, 5 anion exchange resin. The inorganic acids used in the aluminium soap consisting of aluminium and a fatty acid above methods (1) and (2) are monobasic acids, most in a ratio of 1:3 is highly unstable and its preparation is profitably hydrochloric acid or nitric acid, and the alumin very difficult.