FWS/OBS-79/31 DECEMBER 1979 Reprinted 1992 Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States U .S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service The Biological Services Program was established within the U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues which have an impact on fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems . The mission of the Program is as follows: 1 . To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on natural fish and wildlife resources, particularly with respect to environmental impact assessment. 2 . To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major land and water use changes. 3. To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relating to energy development . Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process, to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Biological Services research activities and technical assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, the decision- makers involved and their information needs, and an evaluation of the state-of- the-art to identify information gaps and determine priorities . This is a strategy to assure that the products produced and disseminated will be timely and useful . Biological Services projects have been initiated in the following areas: Coal extraction and conversion Power plants Geothermal, mineral, and oil shale development Water resource analysis, including stream alterations and western water allocation Coastal ecosystems and Outer Continental Shelf development Systems and inventory, including National Wetlands Inventory, habitat classification and analysis, and information transfer The Program consists of the Office of Biological Services in Washington, D.C., which is responsible for overall planning and management; National Teams which provide the Program's central, scientific, and technical expertise, and which ar range for contracting of Biological Services studies with States, universities, con- sulting firms, and others; Regional staff who provide a link to problems at the operating level ; and staff at certain Fish and Wildlife Service research facilities who conduct inhouse research studies . FWS/OBS-79/31 December 1979 CLASSIFICATION OF WETLANDS AND DEEPWATER HABITATS OF THE UNITED STATES By Lewis M. Cowardin U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Jamestown, North Dakota 58401 Virginia Carter U.S . Geological Survey Reston, Virginia 22092 Francis C. Golet Department of Natural Resources Science University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 and Edward T. LaRoe U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Coastal Zone Management Washington, D.C. 20235 Performed for U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Biological Services Washington, D.C. 20240 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data United States, Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. (Biological services program ; FWS/OBS-79/31) 1. Wetlands-United States-Classification. 2. Wetland ecology-United States. 3. Aquatic ecology-United States. I. Cowardin, Lewis M. II. Title. III. Series: United States. Fish and Wildlife Service . Biological services program ; FWS/OBS-79/31 . QH76.U54a 79/31 [QH104] 574.5'0973s [574.5'2632] 79-607795 Foreward Wetlands and deepwater habitats are essential breeding, rearing, and feeding grounds for many species of fish and wildlife. They may also perform important flood protection and pollution control funtions. Increasing National and international recognition of these values has intensified the need for reliable information on the status and ex- tent of wetland resources. To develop comparable information over large areas, a clear definition and classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats is required. The classification system contained in this report was developed by wetland ecologists, with the assistance of many private individuals and organizations and local, State, and Federal agencies. An operational draft was published in October 1977, and a notice of intent to adopt the system for all pertinent Service activities was published December 12, 1977 (42 FR 62432). The Fish and Wildlife Service is officially adopting this wetland classification system. Future wetland data bases developed by the Service, including the National Wetlands Inventory, will utilize this system. A one-year transition period will allow for training of Service personnel, amendment of administrative manuals, and further development of the National Wetlands Inventory data base. During this period, Service personnel may continue to use the old wetland classification described in Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39 for Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act reports, wetland acquisition priority determinations, and other activities in conjunction with the new system, where immediate conversion is not practicable. Upon completion of the transition period, the Circular 39 system will no longer be officially used by the Fish and Wildlife Service except where applicable laws still reference that system or when the only information available is organized according to that system and cannot be restructured without new field surveys. Other Federal and State agencies are encouraged to convert to the use of this system. No specific legal authorities require the use of this system-or any other system for that matter. However, it is expected that the benefits of National consistency and a devel9ping wetland data base utilizing this system will result in acceptance and use by most agencies involved in wetland management. Training can be provided to users by the Service, depending on availability of resources. Congressional committees will be notified of this adoption action and will be encouraged to facilitate general adoption of the new system by amending any laws that reference the Circular 39 system. This is a new system and users will need to study and learn the terminology. The Service is preparing a document to aid in comparing and translating the new system to the Service's former classification system. In the coming year, the Fish and Wildlife Service, in conjunction with the Soil Conservation Service, also plans to develop initial lists of hydrophytic plants and hydric soils that will support interpretation and use of this system. We believe that this system will provide a suitable basis for information gathering for most scientific, educational, and administrative purposes; however, it will not fit all needs. For instance, historical or potentially restorable wetlands are not included in this system, nor was the system designed to accommodate all the requirements of the many recently passed wetland statutes. No attempt was made to define the proprietary or jurisdictional boundaries of Federal, State, or local agencies. Nevertheless, the basic design of the classification system and the resulting data base should assist substantially in the administration of these programs. This report represents the most current methodology available for wetland classification and culminates a long- term effort involving many wetland scientists . Although it may require revision from time to time, it will serve us well in the years ahead. We hope all wetland personnel in all levels of government and the private sector come to know it and use it for the ultimate benefit of America's wetlands. Lynn A. Greenwalt, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Preface Since its publication in 1979, Classification of Wetlands and DeepwaterHabitats ofthe United States has been used in the National inventory of wetlands conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . The system has been widely used throughout the United States and is often cited in the scientific literature. There has also been considerable international interest in use of the classification . Copies from the first printing have been expended and demand requires this reprinting. We have taken this oppor- tunity to correct a number of minor typographical errors, bring plant names into conformity with the National List ofScientific Plant Names (U.S. Dept. Agriculture 1982), and to upgrade the quality of plates as well as furnish addi- tional plates. No changes have been made that either alter the structure of the classification or the meaning of the definitions. Such major revisions must be deferred until certain prerequisite tasks are accomplished. Completion of the list of hydrophytes and other plants occurring in wetlands and the list of hydric soils (see page 3) has been a task of far greater complexity than we envisioned when writing the classification . These lists have received extensive review and are being prepared as computer data bases. In addition, the lists will contain a great deal of ancillary information that will make possible the development of methodologies for their use in both the delinea- tion and classification of wetlands. When the lists and methodologies are completed, reviewed, and tested we will revise the classification and use the lists to add precision