Soziologie-Sociology in the German-Speaking
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vom Erfolg Überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen Der Gegenwart Hark, Sabine 2014
Repositorium für die Geschlechterforschung Vom Erfolg überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen der Gegenwart Hark, Sabine 2014 https://doi.org/10.25595/332 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hark, Sabine: Vom Erfolg überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen der Gegenwart, in: Hänzi, Denis; Matthies, Hildegard; Simon, Dagmar (Hrsg.): Erfolg. Konstellationen und Paradoxien einer gesellschaftlichen Leitorientierung (Baden- Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2014), 76-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25595/332. Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY 4.0 Lizenz (Namensnennung) This document is made available under a CC BY 4.0 License zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz finden (Attribution). For more information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de www.genderopen.de Denis Hänzi 1 Hildegard Matthies Dagmar Simon [Hrsg.] Erfolg Konstellationen und Paradoxien einer gesellschaftlichen Leitorientierung Leviathan Sonderband 29 1 2014 0 Nomos Die Publikation wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung sowie des Europäischen Sozialfonds der Europäischen Union unter den Förderkenn• Leviathan zeichen 01FP0848 und 01FP0849 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autor_innen. Jahrgang 42 ·Sonderband 29 · 2014 Inhaltsübersicht Denis Hänzi, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon Einleitung ....................... -
Gender Paula-Irene Villaand Sabine Hark
Gender Paula-Irene Villaand Sabine Hark Abstract: Researchinthe field of the sociologyofgenderincludes theoretical, em- pirical, and practical studies and drawsonthe entire rangeofsociological methods and theories. This chapter reconstructs the more recent developments in the German- languagesociologyofgender along the lines of key issues―decentering,inequality and difference,intersectionality,care and precarization, and the body―and situates them in theoretical genealogies.Finally, we highlight current debates to outline av- enues for future research. Keywords: Gender,social theory,sexuality,social differences, care, intersectionality 1Introduction In 2019,forty years after the foundingofthe “Women’sStudies in Sociology” section in the German Sociological Association, gender studies are an integralpart of socio- logical research and teaching. The sociologyofgenderincludes theoretical,empirical, and practical (e.g., policy-oriented) approaches and drawsonthe entire rangeof sociological methodsand theories. Being multidisciplinary by nature, sociological gender studies also bridges disciplinary boundaries. Thesociologyofgenderisa constitutive element of the approximately25academic gender-studies programs (B.A./ M.A.) at German universities, most of which takeamultidisciplinary approach. Re- gardless of institution or location, all these programs basicallylist three aspects as their common denominator:apart from inter-and transdisciplinarity,these include “the ‘social category of gender’ as the label for their subject areaand acritical stance -
Contending Directions. Gender Studies in the Entrepreneurial University
Women's Studies International Forum 54 (2016) 84–90 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Women's Studies International Forum journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wsif Contending directions. Gender studies in the entrepreneurial university Sabine Hark Technische Universität Berlin ZIFG, MAR 2-4, Marchstraße 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany article info synopsis Available online 14 July 2015 This article explores the ambivalences and aporias that arouse from the institutionalization of degree-granting programs of Gender Studies in German-speaking countries at a time in which universities are being transformed into entrepreneurial managerially governed organizations. It asks if Gender Studies is a proactive element of those transformation processes or has, as a kind of premium segment of the academic market, even profited from them. It asks if Gender Studies has amassed sufficient academic capital to determine the rules of the academic “game” in Bourdieu's sense or if it is falling victim to global processes of academic accumulation and segmentation. The paper's main argument will be that if the paradoxical precondition for dissent is participation, and if critique and regulation are tied up in a fraught but intimate connection, then the point will be to reflect critically upon those circumstances and conditions under which we produce, distribute and consume knowledge. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In but not of the academy within the civitas academia impose on their scope for action. However, her points are also relevant to the potentials and In her 2009 paper on “clever women” in the university, perspectives of Gender Studies at a time when universities turn the Viennese scholar of Romance languages and literatures into entrepreneurial and/or managerial organizations struc- Friederike Hassauer poses the punning question of how far tured by what, among others, Strathern (2000) has called academia is geschlechtsreif—sexually mature, or ready to be “audit culture”. -
Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien / Gender Studies
Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien / Gender Studies im Wintersemester 2015/16 DirektorInnen des Centrums sind die ProfessorInnen: Helma Lutz, Soziologie GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDE DIREKTORIN ANNA AMELINA, Soziologie STELLVERTRETENDE GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDE DIREKTORIN Phil Langer, Soziologie STELLVERTRETENDER GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDER DIREKTOR Ursula Apitzsch, Soziologie/ Politikwissenschaft Susanne Bauer, Soziologie Birgit Blättel-Mink, Soziologie Barbara Friebertshäuser, Erziehungswissenschaften Ute Gerhard, Soziologie Robert Gugutzer, Sportwissenschaften Kira Kosnick, Soziologie Verena Kuni, Kunstpädagogik Thomas Lemke, Soziologie Susanne Opfermann, Amerikanistik Brita Rang, Erziehungswissenschaften Uta Ruppert, Politikwissenschaft Ute Sacksofsky, Rechtswissenschaft Susanne Schröter, Ethnologie Ulla Wischermann, Soziologie Sekretariat: Barbara Kowollik Wissenschaftliche Koordinatorin: Marianne Schmidbaur Wissenschaftliche und Studentische Hilfskräfte: Anna Krämer Lucyna Kühnemann Kristof Schütt Goethe-Universität Postfach PEG 4 Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6 Tel.: +49 (0) 69-798-35100 PEG 2.G 154 email: [email protected] D-60629 Frankfurt a. M. homepage: http://www.cgc.uni-frankfurt.de Inhalt Das Cornelia Goethe Centrum stellt sich vor 2 Was ist das Cornelia Goethe Centrum? 2 Wer arbeitet im Centrum? 2 1 Was bietet das Centrum Studierenden? 3 1.1 Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien/Gender Studies 3 1.2 Terminankündigungen Wintersemester 2015/16 5 2 Lehrveranstaltungen 7 Fachbereich 01: Rechtswissenschaft 7 Fachbereich 03: Gesellschaftswissenschaften -
Room 105 10:30-11:15
University of Brighton, Edward Street Building 154-155 Edward Street, Brighton, BN2 0JG Wednesday 23 January Registration 9:00-10:30 Edward Street Building Reception Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 10:30-11:15 Conference Opening: Fascism and Populism in Context: From Erdogan to Brexit Volkan Çıdam, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Mark Devenney, University of Brighton, UK Zeynep Gambetti, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Clare Woodford, University of Brighton, UK 11:15-13:15 Keynote Lectures Chair: Zeynep Gambetti Maurizio Lazzarato, Matisse/CNRS, Pantheon-Sorbonne University (University Paris I), France: De Pinochet à Bolsonaro et retour : La vague néo - fasciste qui balaye la planète Jean Comaroff, Harvard University, USA: Crime, sovereignty, and the state: The popular metaphysics of disorder Lunch | 13:15-14:15 | Rooms 210/211 1 Session 1: 14:15-15:45 Panel 1: Decolonising Critical Theory Room: 304 Chair: German Primera Hilla Dayan, Amsterdam University College, Netherlands: Decolonising the population domain: Reflections on apartheid and Israel in the 1950s Liam Farrell and Hasse C, National University of Ireland, Ireland: Critical theory outside “Civilization”: “Women,” slavery, equality and democratic politics in the political theory of Abdullah Öcalan Paolo Bolaños, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines : Critical theory for/from the margins: Appropriating critical theory in the Philippines and what can critical theory learn from the margins Panel 2: The Fascism(s) of Everyday Life Room: 103 Chair: Zeynep Gambetti Anthony Faramelli, -
Criticaltheoryconsortium.Org
criticaltheoryconsortium.org University of Brighton, Edward Street Building 154-155 Edward Street, Brighton, BN2 0JG Wednesday 23 January Registration 9:00-10:30 Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 Tea and coffee available in Rooms 210/211 Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 10:30-11:00 Conference Opening Conference Convenors: Volkan Çıdam, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Mark Devenney, University of Brighton, UK Zeynep Gambetti, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Clare Woodford, University of Brighton, UK 11:00-13:00 Keynote Lectures Maurizio Lazzarato, Matisse/CNRS, Pantheon-Sorbonne University (University Paris I), France: De Pinochet à Bolsonaro et retour : La vague néo - fasciste qui balaye la planète Jean Comaroff, Harvard University, USA: Crime, sovereignty, and the state: The popular metaphysics of disorder Lunch | 13:00-14:15 | Rooms 210/211 2 Session 1: 14:15-15:45 Panel 1: Decolonising Critical Theory 1 Room: 105 Chair: to be announced Jishnu Guha-Majumdar, Johns Hopkins University, USA: Carceral humanism and the animalized politics of prison abolition Liam Farrell and Hasse C, National University of Ireland, Ireland: Critical theory outside “Civilization”: “Women”, slavery, equality and democratic politics in the political theory of Abdullah Öcalan Paolo Bolaños, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines : Critical theory for/from the margins: Appropriating critical theory in the Philippines and what can critical theory learn from the margins Panel 2: Authoritarian -
7 Defamation and the Grammar of Harsh Words1
7 Defamation and the Grammar of Harsh Words1 Sabine Hark & Judith Butler The emergence of ressentiment that turns into support of authoritarianism is one of the most worrying developments of recent times. A harsh grammar and its cor- responding registers of accusation and suspicion, of ostracism and defamation, are increasingly shaping the public code of conduct. Not least thanks to (anti-)social media, disrespect, hate speech, and threats of violence have become an integral part of civil coexistence. The aggressive and intentionally hurtful debates over the rights of gender, sexual and other minorities, or the fair and equitable organization of gender in our society in general, or Gender Studies in particular, contributed significantly to this situation. Debates internal to left, queer-feminist and anti-racist movements have not been completely spared from the epidemic spread of this “crude bourgeois at- titude” (Wilhelm Heitmeyer, orig.: rohe Bürgerlichkeit) – a development that undoubtedly needs urgent reflection and criticism. It is therefore not without a certain tragedy that some writers who claim to be committed to critical reflection have latched onto precisely that coarse cultural formation and its own grammar of harsh words. An example of this can be found in the edited volume Beißreflexe, published in the spring of 2017 by the Berlin-based gay-lesbian publisher Querverlag, as well as in a dossier written by some of the authors of that volume in the July 2017 issue of the feminist journal, Emma, the oldest feminist journal in Germany, edit- 1 This article is an embellished version of a shorter text Hark and Butler published in the German newspaper Die Zeit (“Die Verleumdung”, August 2nd, 2017).