Soziologie-Sociology in the German-Speaking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Soziologie – Sociology in the German-Speaking World Soziologie — Sociology in the German-Speaking World Special Issue Soziologische Revue 2020 Edited by Betina Hollstein, Rainer Greshoff, Uwe Schimank, and Anja Weiß ISBN 978-3-11-062333-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-062727-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-062351-2 ISSN 0343-4109 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627275 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2020947720 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Betina Hollstein, Rainer Greshoff, Uwe Schimank, and Anja Weiß, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Contents ACompanion to German-Language Sociology 1 Culture 9 Uta Karstein and Monika Wohlrab-Sahr Demography and Aging 27 FrançoisHöpflinger EconomicSociology 39 AndreaMaurer Education and Socialization 53 Matthias Grundmann Environment 67 Anita Engels Europe 83 Monika Eigmüller Family and IntimateRelationships 99 Dirk Konietzka, Michael Feldhaus, Michaela Kreyenfeld, and Heike Trappe (Felt) Body.Sports, Medicine, and Media 117 Robert Gugutzerand Claudia Peter Gender 133 Paula-Irene Villa and Sabine Hark Globalization and Transnationalization 149 Anja Weiß GlobalSouth 165 EvaGerharz and Gilberto Rescher HistoryofSociology 181 Stephan Moebius VI Contents Life Course 197 Johannes Huinink and Betina Hollstein Media and Communication 211 Andreas Hepp Microsociology 227 RainerSchützeichel Migration 245 Ludger Pries Mixed-Methods and MultimethodResearch 261 FelixKnappertsbusch, Bettina Langfeldt, and Udo Kelle Organization 273 Raimund Hasse Political Sociology 287 Jörn Lamla Qualitative Methods 301 Betina Hollstein and Nils C. Kumkar Quantitative Methods 315 Alice Barthand Jörg Blasius Religion 331 Matthias Koenig Scienceand Higher Education 345 Anna Kosmützkyand Georg Krücken Social Inequalities―Empirical Focus 361 Gunnar Otte, Mara Boehle, and KatharinaKunißen Social Inequalities―Theoretical Focus 381 ThomasSchwinn Social Movements 399 ThomasKern Contents VII Social Networks 415 Roger Häußling Social Policy 429 Birgit Pfau-Effinger and ChristopherGrages Social Problems 449 Günter Albrecht Social Theory 467 Wolfgang Ludwig Schneider Society 483 Uwe Schimank Space. Urban, Rural, Territorial 499 Martina Löw Technologyand Innovation 515 Werner Rammert Work and Labor 535 Brigitte Aulenbacher and JohannaGrubner List of Contributors 549 Index 555 ACompanion to German-LanguageSociology This book provides the first systematic overviewofthe current state of sociologyin German-speaking countries in the English language. Itsthirty-four chapters review advances and current trends,relatethem to the international discussion and point out challenges and perspectivesfor future research. As the variety of topics shows, the contributions to this volume span the entire rangeofsociological research areas that address pressingquestions both theoretically and empirically. With this special issue of the SOZIOLOGISCHEREVUE,the onlyGerman-language sociological review journal, we want to give international readers some insight into the sociological discussions in German-speaking countries—that is, Germany, Austria, and parts of Switzerland—and familiarize them with the discussions that are still largely conductedinthe German language. We believethat many aspects of these discussions are of interest to an international audience as well and that knowledge about the wider context of the history of ideas in which the German-languagedebate is embedded and how it has evolvedovertime will not onlyenhance mutual under- standing but might alsostimulate and fertilize the broader international debate. In the following,wewill first brieflyaddress some characteristics of the German- languagesociological discourse and its historical background. Second, we will ad- dress the question why, despite the increasing internationalization of German- speakingacademia, asubstantial part of the sociological discussion is still being conducted in the German language. Finally, we provide the reader with some guidance on what to expectinthe articles to follow and offer some tips on how to navigate this volume. 1IsThere a “German-Language Sociology”? When we approachedthe experts who contributed to this volume, we asked them to review the research literature and the discussion in German-languagesociologyin their fields of expertise over the last 15 to 20 years. Specifically, we asked them to identify the defining features of the discussion in these fields and relatethem to the international debate. Are there specific topics or certain perspectivesthat are char- acteristic of the German-languageacademic discussion?What have been the partic- ular advances duringthis period?Are there areas in which the discussion is perhaps lagging behind?Are therespecific highlights or “selling points” unique to the dis- cussion in German-languagesociologyand,ifso, what specificallyhavethey yielded in terms of our understandingofthe respective topic? Despite stark differences among the different sociological fields, we can identify some features that are widelyshared among much of the German-speakingsocio- logical community. OpenAccess. ©2021 Betina Hollstein, Rainer Greshoff,Uwe Schimank, and Anja Weiß, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627275-001 2 ACompanion to German-LanguageSociology Perhaps the most distinct feature of the debates among German-speaking soci- ologists is the generallystronginterest in philosophicallyinformed theory,metho- dology, and epistemology.The political scientistand sociologist Johan Galtung(1981) once spokeofa“teutonic” intellectual style in German-speakingcountries,¹ which he compared to the “saxonic” intellectual style in British and US academia. While Gal- tung sawthe “saxonic” style as being characterized by aprimarilyempirical, strongly data-drivenapproach that is less theory oriented, he perceivedthe “teutonic” style as being marked by astrongerfocus on theory-building and analysis of the underlying paradigms.Although this characterization maybeabit stereotypical, it underlines the fact that German-languagesociologyhas strongroots in Geisteswissenschaften (hu- manities) and idealism. As Alvin Gouldnerpointed out,German social science “developedout of adi- alecticbetween Romanticism and science” (Gouldner,1973: 93). This tension between Geisteswissenschaften and science,between idiographic hermeneutic traditions and nomographic deductive science can be found in the works of the classics, such as Karl Marx, GeorgSimmel, and Max Weber,and has been aleitmotif in German-language sociologyeversince—with times of more or less “peaceful co-existence” and phases of fiercedebates,such as the Popper–Adorno controversy (the so-called Positivis- musstreit [positivism dispute]) in the early1960s (Adorno, 1969). Beyond these theoretical and intellectual roots thatextend far back in time, the political and social upheavals of the 20th century left their imprint and continue to influenceGerman-languagesociologystilltoday. During the Nazi regime,manyso- ciologists fled Germanyand Austria and frequentlywent into exile in the United States,wherethey became influential members of the sociological community, amalgamatingGerman traditions with the US-American style of sociological work. The year 1945marked ahistorical break that motivated many students to study sociologywho later went on to shape the development of the discipline (cf. Fleck, 1996;Bolteand Neidhardt, 1998). As Heinz Bude and Friedhelm Neidhardtdescribein avolume that contains autobiographical memoriesofsociologists of this generation, born in the 1920s, these young people sought to understand this dramatic societal discontinuity, “whereinsome respects everything wasdifferent,but in other respects much remained the same. The politics, the economy, or the lawhad changed radically, but,ifthey had survived, the people in their families, in their neighborhoods, or in the conversations on the corner werebasicallythe sameasbefore” (Bude and Neidhardt, 1998:407;our translation). This younggeneration of sociologists,such as Ralf Dahrendorf, Renate Mayntz, or ErwinK.Scheuch, was generallyvery skeptical of ‘grand theory,’ and was characterized aboveall by astrongorientation towards em- pirical research,inmanycases promoted and intensified by research stays in the US (Bolteand Neidhardt, 1998). According to Fiedler,the “teutonic” intellectual stylecan also be found in Eastern Europe and Rus- sia (2012). ACompaniontoGerman-LanguageSociology 3 The next generation, in the late 1960s, was inspired by aglobalstudent move- ment,which in West Germanywas characterized by adeeplyfelt moralindignation about the ways that the German mainstream had dealt with its Nazi past.Thisgen- eration connected with the work of exiled scholars—both thosestill in the US and those who had returned—and revivedaninterest in theory,especiallyinthe works of Marx, the critical Frankfurt School, and Freudian psychoanalysis.Inspired by the ‘new social movements,’ the expansion of the higher-educational system, and abroad, enduringcultural change,
Recommended publications
  • Vom Erfolg Überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen Der Gegenwart Hark, Sabine 2014

    Vom Erfolg Überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen Der Gegenwart Hark, Sabine 2014

    Repositorium für die Geschlechterforschung Vom Erfolg überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen der Gegenwart Hark, Sabine 2014 https://doi.org/10.25595/332 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hark, Sabine: Vom Erfolg überholt? Feministische Ambivalenzen der Gegenwart, in: Hänzi, Denis; Matthies, Hildegard; Simon, Dagmar (Hrsg.): Erfolg. Konstellationen und Paradoxien einer gesellschaftlichen Leitorientierung (Baden- Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2014), 76-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25595/332. Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY 4.0 Lizenz (Namensnennung) This document is made available under a CC BY 4.0 License zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz finden (Attribution). For more information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de www.genderopen.de Denis Hänzi 1 Hildegard Matthies Dagmar Simon [Hrsg.] Erfolg Konstellationen und Paradoxien einer gesellschaftlichen Leitorientierung Leviathan Sonderband 29 1 2014 0 Nomos Die Publikation wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung sowie des Europäischen Sozialfonds der Europäischen Union unter den Förderkenn• Leviathan zeichen 01FP0848 und 01FP0849 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autor_innen. Jahrgang 42 ·Sonderband 29 · 2014 Inhaltsübersicht Denis Hänzi, Hildegard Matthies und Dagmar Simon Einleitung .......................
  • Gender Paula-Irene Villaand Sabine Hark

    Gender Paula-Irene Villaand Sabine Hark

    Gender Paula-Irene Villaand Sabine Hark Abstract: Researchinthe field of the sociologyofgenderincludes theoretical, em- pirical, and practical studies and drawsonthe entire rangeofsociological methods and theories. This chapter reconstructs the more recent developments in the German- languagesociologyofgender along the lines of key issues―decentering,inequality and difference,intersectionality,care and precarization, and the body―and situates them in theoretical genealogies.Finally, we highlight current debates to outline av- enues for future research. Keywords: Gender,social theory,sexuality,social differences, care, intersectionality 1Introduction In 2019,forty years after the foundingofthe “Women’sStudies in Sociology” section in the German Sociological Association, gender studies are an integralpart of socio- logical research and teaching. The sociologyofgenderincludes theoretical,empirical, and practical (e.g., policy-oriented) approaches and drawsonthe entire rangeof sociological methodsand theories. Being multidisciplinary by nature, sociological gender studies also bridges disciplinary boundaries. Thesociologyofgenderisa constitutive element of the approximately25academic gender-studies programs (B.A./ M.A.) at German universities, most of which takeamultidisciplinary approach. Re- gardless of institution or location, all these programs basicallylist three aspects as their common denominator:apart from inter-and transdisciplinarity,these include “the ‘social category of gender’ as the label for their subject areaand acritical stance
  • Contending Directions. Gender Studies in the Entrepreneurial University

    Contending Directions. Gender Studies in the Entrepreneurial University

    Women's Studies International Forum 54 (2016) 84–90 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Women's Studies International Forum journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wsif Contending directions. Gender studies in the entrepreneurial university Sabine Hark Technische Universität Berlin ZIFG, MAR 2-4, Marchstraße 23, 10587 Berlin, Germany article info synopsis Available online 14 July 2015 This article explores the ambivalences and aporias that arouse from the institutionalization of degree-granting programs of Gender Studies in German-speaking countries at a time in which universities are being transformed into entrepreneurial managerially governed organizations. It asks if Gender Studies is a proactive element of those transformation processes or has, as a kind of premium segment of the academic market, even profited from them. It asks if Gender Studies has amassed sufficient academic capital to determine the rules of the academic “game” in Bourdieu's sense or if it is falling victim to global processes of academic accumulation and segmentation. The paper's main argument will be that if the paradoxical precondition for dissent is participation, and if critique and regulation are tied up in a fraught but intimate connection, then the point will be to reflect critically upon those circumstances and conditions under which we produce, distribute and consume knowledge. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. In but not of the academy within the civitas academia impose on their scope for action. However, her points are also relevant to the potentials and In her 2009 paper on “clever women” in the university, perspectives of Gender Studies at a time when universities turn the Viennese scholar of Romance languages and literatures into entrepreneurial and/or managerial organizations struc- Friederike Hassauer poses the punning question of how far tured by what, among others, Strathern (2000) has called academia is geschlechtsreif—sexually mature, or ready to be “audit culture”.
  • Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien / Gender Studies

    Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien / Gender Studies

    Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien / Gender Studies im Wintersemester 2015/16 DirektorInnen des Centrums sind die ProfessorInnen: Helma Lutz, Soziologie GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDE DIREKTORIN ANNA AMELINA, Soziologie STELLVERTRETENDE GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDE DIREKTORIN Phil Langer, Soziologie STELLVERTRETENDER GESCHÄFTSFÜHRENDER DIREKTOR Ursula Apitzsch, Soziologie/ Politikwissenschaft Susanne Bauer, Soziologie Birgit Blättel-Mink, Soziologie Barbara Friebertshäuser, Erziehungswissenschaften Ute Gerhard, Soziologie Robert Gugutzer, Sportwissenschaften Kira Kosnick, Soziologie Verena Kuni, Kunstpädagogik Thomas Lemke, Soziologie Susanne Opfermann, Amerikanistik Brita Rang, Erziehungswissenschaften Uta Ruppert, Politikwissenschaft Ute Sacksofsky, Rechtswissenschaft Susanne Schröter, Ethnologie Ulla Wischermann, Soziologie Sekretariat: Barbara Kowollik Wissenschaftliche Koordinatorin: Marianne Schmidbaur Wissenschaftliche und Studentische Hilfskräfte: Anna Krämer Lucyna Kühnemann Kristof Schütt Goethe-Universität Postfach PEG 4 Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6 Tel.: +49 (0) 69-798-35100 PEG 2.G 154 email: [email protected] D-60629 Frankfurt a. M. homepage: http://www.cgc.uni-frankfurt.de Inhalt Das Cornelia Goethe Centrum stellt sich vor 2 Was ist das Cornelia Goethe Centrum? 2 Wer arbeitet im Centrum? 2 1 Was bietet das Centrum Studierenden? 3 1.1 Zertifikatsprogramm Frauenstudien/Gender Studies 3 1.2 Terminankündigungen Wintersemester 2015/16 5 2 Lehrveranstaltungen 7 Fachbereich 01: Rechtswissenschaft 7 Fachbereich 03: Gesellschaftswissenschaften
  • Room 105 10:30-11:15

    Room 105 10:30-11:15

    University of Brighton, Edward Street Building 154-155 Edward Street, Brighton, BN2 0JG Wednesday 23 January Registration 9:00-10:30 Edward Street Building Reception Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 10:30-11:15 Conference Opening: Fascism and Populism in Context: From Erdogan to Brexit Volkan Çıdam, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Mark Devenney, University of Brighton, UK Zeynep Gambetti, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Clare Woodford, University of Brighton, UK 11:15-13:15 Keynote Lectures Chair: Zeynep Gambetti Maurizio Lazzarato, Matisse/CNRS, Pantheon-Sorbonne University (University Paris I), France: De Pinochet à Bolsonaro et retour : La vague néo - fasciste qui balaye la planète Jean Comaroff, Harvard University, USA: Crime, sovereignty, and the state: The popular metaphysics of disorder Lunch | 13:15-14:15 | Rooms 210/211 1 Session 1: 14:15-15:45 Panel 1: Decolonising Critical Theory Room: 304 Chair: German Primera Hilla Dayan, Amsterdam University College, Netherlands: Decolonising the population domain: Reflections on apartheid and Israel in the 1950s Liam Farrell and Hasse C, National University of Ireland, Ireland: Critical theory outside “Civilization”: “Women,” slavery, equality and democratic politics in the political theory of Abdullah Öcalan Paolo Bolaños, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines : Critical theory for/from the margins: Appropriating critical theory in the Philippines and what can critical theory learn from the margins Panel 2: The Fascism(s) of Everyday Life Room: 103 Chair: Zeynep Gambetti Anthony Faramelli,
  • Criticaltheoryconsortium.Org

    Criticaltheoryconsortium.Org

    criticaltheoryconsortium.org University of Brighton, Edward Street Building 154-155 Edward Street, Brighton, BN2 0JG Wednesday 23 January Registration 9:00-10:30 Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 Tea and coffee available in Rooms 210/211 Edward Street Lecture Theatre Room 105 10:30-11:00 Conference Opening Conference Convenors: Volkan Çıdam, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Mark Devenney, University of Brighton, UK Zeynep Gambetti, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Clare Woodford, University of Brighton, UK 11:00-13:00 Keynote Lectures Maurizio Lazzarato, Matisse/CNRS, Pantheon-Sorbonne University (University Paris I), France: De Pinochet à Bolsonaro et retour : La vague néo - fasciste qui balaye la planète Jean Comaroff, Harvard University, USA: Crime, sovereignty, and the state: The popular metaphysics of disorder Lunch | 13:00-14:15 | Rooms 210/211 2 Session 1: 14:15-15:45 Panel 1: Decolonising Critical Theory 1 Room: 105 Chair: to be announced Jishnu Guha-Majumdar, Johns Hopkins University, USA: Carceral humanism and the animalized politics of prison abolition Liam Farrell and Hasse C, National University of Ireland, Ireland: Critical theory outside “Civilization”: “Women”, slavery, equality and democratic politics in the political theory of Abdullah Öcalan Paolo Bolaños, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines : Critical theory for/from the margins: Appropriating critical theory in the Philippines and what can critical theory learn from the margins Panel 2: Authoritarian
  • 7 Defamation and the Grammar of Harsh Words1

    7 Defamation and the Grammar of Harsh Words1

    7 Defamation and the Grammar of Harsh Words1 Sabine Hark & Judith Butler The emergence of ressentiment that turns into support of authoritarianism is one of the most worrying developments of recent times. A harsh grammar and its cor- responding registers of accusation and suspicion, of ostracism and defamation, are increasingly shaping the public code of conduct. Not least thanks to (anti-)social media, disrespect, hate speech, and threats of violence have become an integral part of civil coexistence. The aggressive and intentionally hurtful debates over the rights of gender, sexual and other minorities, or the fair and equitable organization of gender in our society in general, or Gender Studies in particular, contributed significantly to this situation. Debates internal to left, queer-feminist and anti-racist movements have not been completely spared from the epidemic spread of this “crude bourgeois at- titude” (Wilhelm Heitmeyer, orig.: rohe Bürgerlichkeit) – a development that undoubtedly needs urgent reflection and criticism. It is therefore not without a certain tragedy that some writers who claim to be committed to critical reflection have latched onto precisely that coarse cultural formation and its own grammar of harsh words. An example of this can be found in the edited volume Beißreflexe, published in the spring of 2017 by the Berlin-based gay-lesbian publisher Querverlag, as well as in a dossier written by some of the authors of that volume in the July 2017 issue of the feminist journal, Emma, the oldest feminist journal in Germany, edit- 1 This article is an embellished version of a shorter text Hark and Butler published in the German newspaper Die Zeit (“Die Verleumdung”, August 2nd, 2017).