DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transport Funding Priorities Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transport Funding Priorities Overview REGIONAL TRANSPOrt FUNDING PrIORITIES Overview Northern Tasmania Development The transport funding priorities NTD has outlined in this document (NTD) is the northern regional have been identified and developed in collaboration with these development body established by the eight local councils to ensure they deliver a regional advantage eight northern councils that make up and provide increased opportunities to a significant proportion this region. These eight councils are: of the Northern Tasmania population. This development process has included the mayors and general managers of each council. • Break O’Day Council This document contains two sections. The first section • Dorset Council summarises the region’s top four transport infrastructure priorities, as identified and agreed upon by all eight of the • Flinders Council municipal councils. The documentation of these projects allows strength in lobbying through a united voice, a rapid response to • George Town Council future funding opportunities, and further legitimises the projects and the identification process undertaken. The projects, listed in • Launceston City Council order of priority, are as follows: • Meander Valley Council 1. Review of the Northern Tasmania Integrated Transport • Northern Midlands Council Strategy • West Tamar Council 2. Maintenance of State and National Road Network 3. Bell Bay Expansion Project 4. Lady Barron/Bridport Redevelopment Section Two lists individual projects that are priority for the local government area/s in which the projects are located. It is recommended that the individual projects form part of a review of the Northern Tasmania Integrated Transport Strategy (identified above as regional priority 1). 2 SECTION 1 Northern Tasmania Regional Transport FUNDING PrIORITIES 3 Review of Northern Tasmanian Integrated Transport Plan DESCRIPTION: ASSESSMENT: Regional transport plans are a There have been some significant regional changes since 2003 key component of Tasmania’s that necessitate a comprehensive review of the Plan. In addition, strategic planning framework it must be reviewed to incorporate current National and State for transport infrastructure policy directions and contemporary approaches to transport and services, and the need for issues. plans at this level is recognised in the Tasmanian Infrastructure The Plan will be a collaborative initiative between the Tasmanian Strategy. The absence of Government, Northern Tasmania Development and the eight rigorous up- to- date plans will northern councils, and will involve detailed assessment of the result in poor infrastructure characteristics and trends in the region. The Plan needs to be and service decisions that can underpinned by the latest data and application of analytical have a long-term profound models to analyse the current situation and future scenarios. impact on outcomes for Transport challenges and opportunities will then be considered Tasmanian communities. to inform what actions need to be taken, with objectives and Integrated Regional transport strategies then developed against a number of strategic policy Plans are in place for each of areas. On completion of the 10 year Plan, key initiatives and an Tasmania’s three regions, the annual Action Plan will be developed. Northern Tasmanian Plan was released in 2003. Commencement of the review will be dependent on budget allocation within the Deptartment of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (DIER) and the capacity of departmental and council staff to allocate priority and resources. PROJECT VALUE: $500,000 4 Maintenance of State and National Road Network DESCRIPTION: ASSESSMENT: Tasmania’s state managed DIER uses a five tier State Road hierarchy to classify the road road network comprises about network based on strategic importance to assist with the strategic 3650 km of roads and 1200 management and planning of the State’s transport system. bridges. The network includes A strategic asset management approach is used for setting of nearly 400 km of roads, service levels and prioritising funding needs. nominated as the National Network, which is eligible Routine maintenance is provided through regional network for funding contributions by contracts to maintain the network in a safe and serviceable the Australian Government. condition. Development of ongoing forward works programs The Australian Government for major maintenance works and asset renewals are delivered maintenance contribution is through specific works contracts. Forward works programs are based on a National Network subject to regular change. formula approach to distribute funding among the state road DIER develops budget submissions based on the State authorities. Government’s annual budget process. These annual submissions include maintenance requirements as a core component. A Community concerns submission will be provided in early 2011 for the 2011/12 regarding the need for budget. maintaining appropriate road service levels are recognised. NTD/northern councils could develop a budget submission that Increased level of maintenance reflects their infrastructure concerns. intervention requires additional maintenance funding. A possible approach could be to: • identify state assets of maintenance concern in the northern region • confirm from DIER their current timing/priority within forward programs • forward a submission based on undesirable gaps. 5 Bell Bay Expansion Project DESCRIPTION: ASSESSMENT: Tasmania’s island status results The Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (DIER) in a heavy reliance on our ports has submitted this project to Infrastructure Australia (IA) for for the bulk of our exports and consideration for future Federal Government funding. The project imports. Port activity is forecast has been included in IA’s national pipeline of projects as a project to increase significantly over with real potential. Tasports and DIER is continuing to work with the next 20 years with growth IA on the planning and development of the project, to enable IA in total tonnage, bulk trade to further its assessment of the project. and container volumes. Recent commercial decisions to increase container traffic through The Tasmanian Government Burnie over the short term does not reduce or detract from the has identified the Bell Bay strategic importance of the Bell Bay project. It is critical that the intermodal expansion as a Tasmanian Government takes a long term integrated view in priority project supporting this planning its infrastructure networks. long term freight growth. As a major export port, the Bell Bay Under existing conditions Tasmania’s northern ports have a total project is a critical part of the capacity of 650,000 TEUs (twenty foot equivalent unit container). Government’s broader focus Medium term forecasts are predicting a need for a capacity of on removing constraints in 800,000 TEUs. Redevelopment of Bell Bay will support an increase Tasmania’s north south freight in capacity from 150,000 TEUs to 650,000 TEUs in the longer supply chain. term. While some additional capacity remains at Devonport port, as an urban port it faces significant constraints to future expansion. Burnie Port faces similar constraints. Bell Bay is the only port capable of significant expansion in the longer term to support growth in Tasmania’s container market. The support of the northern councils in the continued development of this project is an important element. PROJECT VALUE: $160 MILLION 6 Lady Barron/Bridport Port DESCRIPTION: ASSESSMENT: As part of the regional transport The link and associated infrastructure between the port of priorities the improvement and Bridport and the Furneaux Group of Islands is critical to the upgrade of port facilities at economic growth potential of both municipalities and the region. Lady Barron (for the Furneaux Dorset and Flinders Council see the development of modern, Group of Islands) and Bridport small-scale port facilities at both Bridport and Lady Barron as an is critical to the sustainability important long-term infrastructure project to stimulate growth and growth of the region. and build capacity. The Furneaux Group of The Tasmanian Government has provided $1.7M over the next Islands relies heavily on ports two years for basic upgrades to the Lady Barron Port facility. An infrastructure for the bulk of allocation of funds to undertake further significant upgrades their exports and imports. is required. Consultants Aurecon have already prepared a high Current port facilities are level master plan that outlines priority works. The sustainable ageing and not reflective of redevelopment of the Lady Barron Port will provide a significant the requirements of a modern step towards achieving the directions of the Flinders Council and facility or the goods requiring to diversify what Flinders Island has to offer to residents and transport, storage and visitors. This should include delineation of the commercial and distribution. The current facility recreational activities of the Lady Barron Port and provide specific frustrates and constrains the opportunity to a small-scale marina development to compliment ability of the islands’ economy the immense tourist potential of Flinders Island. It is recognised to grow and provide for the that in addition to the improvement of port related infrastructure, efficient delivery and storage there is a clear need to support a reliable shipping service that of goods. enables industry, agriculture and the community to plan in confidence and deliver the ‘Flinders’ brand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George Town Council
    GEORGE TOWN COUNCIL Council Office: 16-18 Anne Street, George Town, Tasmania 7253 Postal Address: PO Box 161 George Town, Tasmania 7253 Telephone: (03) 6382 8800 Facsimile: (03) 6382 8899 Email: [email protected] Mayor Bridget Archer invites you to explore opportunities to invest, live and visit George Town:: “George Town and the East Tamar region in Tasmania are uniquely located to offer exciting opportunities to invest, live and visit” – Mayor Bridget Archer George Town and East Tamar Area George Town and the East Tamar region in Tasmania are uniquely located to offer exciting opportunities to invest live and visit. The region has a mild temperate climate and has direct frontage to the Tamar River Estuary and the ocean via Bass Strait. Coastal and river environments are held in high regard by many people across Australia and internationally who are looking for attractive investment and life style options. The George Town municipal area provides this in combination with many other attractive features that are noted below. Climate The George Town and surrounding East Tamar area has a temperate maritime climate with a moderate temperature range (at Low Head, average daily maximum temperature is 21 degrees C in February and 12.5 degrees C in July). Average rainfall is less than 800 mm per year with a distinct seasonal cycle. Other Facts - Location: Northern Tasmania on Bass Straight - Area: 64,900ha/649km² - Roads: 271km - Population George Town (2011 Census): 4,304 - Water Supply: TasWater - Estimated population of the Council area: 6,789 (2011/12) Transport Links – Access to International, National and Regional Markets Port for Domestic and International Bulk Goods as well as Container Services Located at Bell Bay and managed by TasPorts Corporation Pty Ltd, the Port of Bell Bay is conveniently located in the George Town area and is adjacent to the Bell Bay industrial precinct, a major Tasmanian industrial area.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Election Report 2005
    Tasmania Local Government Election Report 2005 Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Statewide election statistics Return of postal votes ..................................................................................................... 10 Council response rate in order of enrolment ................................................................... 12 Percentage response rate by age group and gender ...................................................... 14 Validation of declaration envelopes ................................................................................. 16 Break up of declarations rejected .................................................................................... 17 Informal ballot paper survey ............................................................................................ 18 Ballot papers admitted and formality .............................................................................. 20 Break up of postal votes .................................................................................................. 22 Council election outcomes Councillors, Mayors & Deputy Mayors as at October 2005 ............................................ 24 Casual Vacancies ............................................................................................................. 3 Elector Polls since the 2002 elections ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW of VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION and SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS
    Local Government Board Review FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Voluntary Amalgamation and Shared Services Options 1 FINAL REPORT: REVIEW OF VOLUNTARY AMALGAMATION AND SHARED SERVICES OPTIONS: SORELL AND TASMAN COUNCILS Author Local Government Board GPO Box 123 ISBN Hobart, TAS, 7001 978 0 7246 5748 7 Publisher Date Local Government Board August 2018 © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania July 2018 2 CONTENTS The Local Government Board 5 Abbreviations 6 Definitions 7 Foreword 8 Executive Summary 9 1. Introduction 13 1.1. Background to the Review 13 1.2. Scope of the Review 14 1.3. Process for the Review 17 2. Local Government Reform Context: Amalgamations and Shared Services 19 2.1. Insights from shared services 20 2.2. Insights from previous amalgamation processes and outcomes 22 2.3. Other recent Tasmanian shared services and voluntary amalgamation studies 24 3. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Municipal Areas 26 3.1. Introduction 26 3.2. Demography 27 3.3. Economy 30 3.4. Social 32 4. Key Features of the Sorell and Tasman Councils 34 4.1. Introduction 34 4.2. Current financial viability/performance 35 4.3. Councillors and staff 37 4.4. Current Shared Services Arrangements between Sorell and Tasman Councils 38 4.5. Role of Shared General Manager of Sorell and Tasman Councils 40 3 5. Stand-Alone Councils (Option 1 – No change) 41 5.1. Introduction 41 5.2. Financial Sustainability as Stand-Alone Councils: (10-20 year outlook) 42 5.3. Effective local representation 55 5.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Email Address Web Site Mayor General Manager
    COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESS WEB SITE MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'Day Council [email protected] http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown Brighton Council [email protected] http://www.brighton.tas.gov.au Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council [email protected] http://www.burnie.net Mayor Steve Kons Mr Andrew Wardlaw Central Coast Council [email protected] http://www.centcoast.tas.gov.au Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council [email protected] http://www.centralhighlands.tas.gov.au Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council [email protected] http://www.circularhead.tas.gov.au Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City Of [email protected] http://www.ccc.tas.gov.au Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council [email protected] http://www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council [email protected] http://www.devonport.tas.gov.au Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council [email protected] http://www.dorset.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council [email protected] http://www.flinders.tas.gov.au Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council [email protected] http://www.georgetown.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [email protected] http://www.gsbc.tas.gov.au Mayor Jenny Woods (A/g) Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Action Plan 2018 –2021 December 2018 Acknowledgements
    GEORGE TOWN Destination Action Plan 2018 –2021 December 2018 Acknowledgements The development of the George Town Destination Action Plan (DAP) has been facilitated by Tourism Northern Tasmania (TNT), supported by George Town Council in partnership with the Department of State Growth. The process brought together representatives from all stakeholder groups that benefit from the visitor economy, local government, industry and the community, to develop a plan. This Plan seeks to identify the challenges and opportunities facing the destination and to establish achievable, affordable priorities that if delivered would increase George Town’s competitiveness. Specifically, we would like to thank the individuals that participated in the plan development process and the review undertaken in August to December 2018. Facilitator Coordinator Chris Griffin – TNT Sonia Mellor –TNT Destination Action Plan Leadership Group (2016) Anne Cameron – George Town Council Jye Marshall – JavElle's Coffee Robin Dornauf – Meander Valley Dairy Lee-Ann Patterson – George Town Council Sarah Hickling – Low Head Tourist Park Theresa Plumstead – East Beach Tourist Park Stacy File – Hillwood Berry Farm Sue Sherriff – News Xpress Julius Godman – Peppers York Cove Adrienne Smeeton – Lighthouse Regional Arts Greg Humphries – Pier Hotel Mike Turner – Envorinex Maureen Lacey – Harcourts East Tamar John Watts – Low Head Pilot Station Maritime Museum Shirley Lincoln – Low Head Penguin Tours Lorraine Wootten – George Town and District Andrew Michieletto – George Town Chamber of
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Ordinary Council Meeting
    Agenda Ordinary Council Meeting 20 April 2021 CERTIFICATION “I certify that with respect to all advice, information or recommendation provided to Council with this agenda: 1. The advice, information or recommendation is given by a person who has the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information or recommendation, and; 2. Where any advice is given directly to Council by a person who does not have the required qualifications or experience that person has obtained and taken into account in that person’s general advice the advice from an appropriately qualified or experienced person.” Note: S65(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 requires the General Manager to ensure that any advice, information or recommendation given to the Council (or a Council Committee) is given by a person who has the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information or recommendation. S65(2) forbids Council from deciding any matter which requires the advice of a qualified person without considering that advice. Dated this 15th day of April 2021 Warren Groves GENERAL MANAGER Table of Contents 1 Acknowledgement of Country ........................................................................................ 1 2 Confirmation of Minutes ................................................................................................. 1 3 Public Question Time ..................................................................................................... 1 4 Responses to Public Questions ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Inundation Define the Areas of Concern
    Coastal inundation Define the areas of concern Definition: Coastal inundation the temporary and permanent flooding of a portion of land within the coastal zone. – Temporary inundation is a storm tide event that considers the following factors; • regional storm surge and tides, • climate change (including sea level rise allowance and changing likelihood of storm events), • local storm surge ,wave setup, wave runup - not modelled . – Permanent inundation is the permanent loss of land to the sea, it considers the following factors: • National Tide Centre high water mark (tides), • climate change sea level rise planning allowance. – Tsunami events are considered as part of the emergency management controls. Department of Premier and Cabinet 2 Definition: Annual Exceedance Probability Department of Premier and Cabinet 3 Coastal inundation - inputs State wide 25m DEM (DPIPWE) LiDAR mapping NTC mean high tide (CFT) (NTC) State sea level rise Coastal allowance vulnerability assessment (Stage1 (DPAC - TCCO) -TPC) Coastal inundation Extreme tides and Storm studies by local sea level events government ACE CRC (CFT) (Clarence City tide Council) Department of Premier and Cabinet Coastal inundation - inputs LiDAR mapping (CFT) State sea level rise State wide 25m allowance DEM (TCCO) (DPIPWE) Coastal inundation NTC mean high Permanent studies by local tide government (NTC / ACE-CRC) inundation (Clarence City Council) Department of Premier and Cabinet 6 Assumptions used in the non LiDAR areas • When mapping the projected flood levels the figure has been
    [Show full text]
  • Tamar NRM Inc. 2018-2019 Annual Report
    TAMAR NRM Inc. 2018-2019 Annual Report Supported by: Tamar NRM Inc. 2018-2019 Annual Report Postal Address PO Box 396, Launceston TAS 7250 Street Address Launceston City Council Depot 50 Remount Road, Mowbray TAS 7250 Telephone [03] 6323-3310 Email [email protected] Website www.tamarnrm.com.au Facebook www.facebook.com/TamarNRM15 2 Tamar NRM Inc. 2018-2019 Annual Report Table of Contents 1. About Tamar NRM ............................................................................................... 4 2. Management Committee ..................................................................................... 5 3. Our Staff .............................................................................................................. 9 4. Key Numbers ..................................................................................................... 11 5. President's Report ............................................................................................. 12 6. Program Coordinators' Report ........................................................................... 15 7. Overview of Tamar NRM Projects ..................................................................... 17 7.1. Sustainable Living Expo (Sustainable Living Working Group) .................... 18 7.2. Ragwort Raid .............................................................................................. 20 7.3. Agriculturally Focussed Projects ................................................................. 22 7.4. Fire and Biodiversity ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    1993 Local Government (Special Elections) No. 97 TASMANIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT (SPECIAL ELECTIONS) ACT 1993 No. 97 of 1993 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation PART 2 ELECTIONS Division 1-1994 Elections 4. Application of Division 5. Elections for relevant councils in 1994 6. Postal voting 1851 No. 97 Local Government (Special Elections) 1993 Division 2-1996 Elections 7. Elections for other councils in 1996 PART 3 MISCELLANEOUS 8. Regulations 9. Administration of Act SCHEDULE 1 RELEVANT COUNCILS 1852 1993 Local Government (Special Elections) No. 97 LOCAL GOVERNMENT (SPECIAL ELECTIONS) ACT 1993 No. 97 of 1993 AN ACT to provide for special arrangements for the Council elections in 1994 and 1996 [Royal Assent 23 December 1993] E it enacted by His Excellency the Governor of Tasmania, B by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and House of Assembly, in Parliament assembled, as follows:- PART 1 PRELIMINARY Short title 1-This Act may be cited as the Local Government (Special Elections) Act 1993. 1853 s. 2 No. 97 Local Government (Special Elections) 1993 Commencement 2-This Act commences on a day to be proclaimed. Interpretation 3-ln this Act- "councillor" means a councillor as defined in the Local Government Act 1993; "deputy mayor" means a deputy mayor to be elected by the electors under the Local Government Act 1993; "elector" means an elector as defined in the Local Government Act 1993; "mayor" means a mayor to be elected by the electors under the Local Government Act 1993; "municipal area" means a municipal area as defined in the Local Government Act 1993; "postal vote certificate" means a postal vote certificate as defined in the Local Government Act 1993; "relevant council" means a council specified in Schedule 1.
    [Show full text]
  • River-Tamar-Boating-Guide-2013-5Mb
    Two Mile AVOIDING COLLISIONS Reef OPERATION IN PILOTAGE AREAS Rules for Safe Navigation BASS STRAIT Recreational vessels often operate in shipping ports and channels. Lookout Small craft skippers must be aware that large ships cannot alter course or The skipper of a vessel must always ensure that a good lookout is maintained. A good lookout speed quickly and often their draught restricts them to a very specific course. In keeps both a visual check and also listens for vessels, sound signals, breaking water and the like. Be addition, it is difficult to even observe small craft from the bridges of certain ships. fully aware of the boating environment, especially in bad weather, restricted visibility or darkness. Ships operating in harbours and ports are required to either carry a pilot Do not confuse the role of an observer when the boat is towing a water skier with a lookout. Hebe (an adviser to the vessel’s Master regarding navigation in the port) or Both a lookout for general dangers and a check of the skier are required. Reef She Oak Le the Master must have a pilotage exemption. In such circumstances, the Middle Channel recreational skipper must keep clear of the ship at all times. The ship will Giving Way ads display a flag to signify pilotage status. Responsibilities between vessels under way LOW HEAD • The skipper must continuously assess the risk of Lighthouse collision with other vessels. Middle Bank DON’T RUBBISH OUR WATERWAYS • If you are required to give way, do it in good time Bottles, cans and plastic bags create dangerous hazards to all.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL ADDRESS PHONE FAX MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'day Council 32-34 Georges Bay Esplanade, ST HELENS TAS 7216 6376 79
    COUNCIL ADDRESS PHONE FAX MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O’Day Council 32-34 Georges Bay Esplanade, 6376 7900 Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown ST HELENS TAS 7216 Brighton Council 1 Tivoli Road, OLD BEACH 7017 6268 7000 6268 7013 Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council PO Box 973, BURNIE 7320 6430 5700 6431 3896 Mayor Steve Kons Mr Gary Neil (A/g) Central Coast Council PO Box 220, ULVERSTONE 7315 6429 8900 64251224 Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council PO Box 20, HAMILTON 7140 6286 3202 6286 3334 Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council PO Box 348, SMITHTON 7330 6452 4800 6452 4861 Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City of PO Box 96, ROSNY PARK 7018 6217 9500 Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council PO Box 595, NEW NORFOLK 7140 6261 8500 6261 8546 Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council PO Box 604, DEVONPORT 7310 6424 0511 Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council PO Box 21, SCOTTSDALE 7260 6352 6500 6352 6509 Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council PO Box 40, WHITEMARK 7255 6359 5001 6359 2211 Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council PO Box 161, GEORGE TOWN 7253 6382 8800 6382 3240 Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council PO Box 6, TRIABUNNA 7190 6256 4777 6256 4774 Mayor Robert Young Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council PO Box 103, GLENORCHY 7010 6216 6800 6216 6400 Mayor Kristie Johnston Mr Tony McMullen Hobart, City of GPO Box 503, HOBART 7001 6238 2711 6234 7109 Lord Mayor Anna
    [Show full text]
  • National Local Government Customer Service Network Inc Tasmanian Chapter - General Meeting Thursday 10 May 2018
    NATIONAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT CUSTOMER SERVICE NETWORK INC TASMANIAN CHAPTER - GENERAL MEETING THURSDAY 10 MAY 2018 PRESENT: Robbie Shafe Kingborough Council Danielle Harvey Devonport City Council Sandra Magor Devonport City Council Hayden Steele Clarence City Council Petah Long Clarence City Council Jen O’Dea Clarence City Council Cassie Sheehan Meander Valley Council Lucy Langridge Northern Midlands Bronwyn Rigby Northern Midlands Louise Dickenson George Town Council Jaquie Leonard Launceston City Council Helen Parker Launceston City Council Kate Woodland Launceston City Council Tricia Hankin Huon Valley Council Maree Alexander Huon Valley Council APOLOGIES: Gabrielle Bowring Glenorchy City Council Rebecca Webster Glenorchy City Council Jonathon Marshall Circular Head Council Lindy Ingham West Tamar Council Karen Smith West Tamar Council Leeanne Wheeler Dorset Council David Banks Hobart City Council Meeting Opened 9:55am Welcome Robbie Shafe welcomed attendees and outlined the Robbie Shafe day’s proceedings. President National Local Government Customer Service Network 1 | P a g e NATIONAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT CUSTOMER SERVICE NETWORK INC TASMANIAN CHAPTER - GENERAL MEETING THURSDAY 10 MAY 2018 Workshop – Communication Styles, Topics covered; Stacey Joseph Behaviours and Emotional • Overview of DISC model Tasmanian Chamber of Commernce & Industry ltd. Intelligence • Understanding preferred communication and behaviour styles • Modify own communication style to suit the audience • The Five Pillars of Emotional Intelligence • Use of Emotional Intelligence
    [Show full text]