DOCSLIB.ORG

Offshore Wind Farm Projects Kristinestad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Offshore Wind Farm Projects Kristinestad Tornio Royttan merotuulivoimapuisto (70 MW, 14) Rajakiiri OY Ajos (26.4 MW, 8) IKEA Kemin Ajoksen Merituulivoimapuiston (81+ MW, 27) Ajos Wind Oy Suurhiekka (480 MW, 80) Suurhiekka Offshore Oy (WPD Offshore GmbH) Lumijoki, Varjakka (2MW, 1) Lumituuli Oy Raahe / Pertunmatala (48+ MW, 12+) Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy Raahe / Ulkonahkiainen (140+ MW, 70) Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy Raahe / Maanahkiaisen (210+MW,70) Rajakiiri OY Rata Storgrund P2(10+turbines) Rewind Offshore AB Kokkolan Merituulivoimapuiston Merventoi Oy Rata Storgrund P1 (10+ turbines) Rewind Offshore AB Europe - Offshore Wind Projects 2020 Kristiansund U Vaasa Averøya Havvind Demonstation Site G Sandøy Havsul (350MW,35+) Havgul Nordic AS EUROPE Härnösand Ålesund Offshore Wind Farm Projects Kristinestad Stadt Test Areas (10MW, 2) Kvernevick Engineering Siipyyn/Kristiinakaupunki (240+ MW, 80+) Suomen Merituuli Oy/EPV Energia/ Helsigem Energia Tórshavn Måløy 11th Edition - 2020 Compiled, Designed and Produced by La Tene Maps Pori Tahkoluoto extension (?MW) Tel: +353-1-2847914 Fax: +353-1-2826311 Email: [email protected] Website: www.latenemaps.com Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Pori Tahkoluoto (42MW, 10 ) Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Pori 1 (2.3 MW, 1) Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Pori Hywind Tampen (88MM, 11) Gretas Klackar (?MW) Equinor, Petoro, Exxon Mobil Northern Gulf of Bothnia SVEA Vind Offshore Kalix Tornio Royttan merotuulivoimapuisto (70 MW, 14) Rajakiiri OY Storgrundet (420MW, 70) Rauma Føroyar Kemi Storgrundet Offshore AB (WPD Offshore GmbH) Ajos (26.4 MW, 8) IKEA Luleå Fenno-Skan HVDC Link (500 MW) (Denmark) Utposten II Tornio Royttan merotuulivoimapuisto (70 MW, 14) SWEDEN Sweden to Finland Rajakiiri OY Kemin Ajoksen Merituulivoimapuiston SVEA Vind Offshore (81+ MW, 27) Utposten (168MW) Ajos (26.4 MW, 8) IKEA Ajos Wind Oy SVEA Vind Offshore Kemin Ajoksen Merituulivoimapuiston (81+ MW, 27) Ajos Wind Oy Shetland Piteå Suurhiekka (480 MW, 80) Suurhiekka Offshore Oy (WPD Offshore GmbH) FINLAND Suurhiekka (480 MW, 80) Utknallen Suurhiekka Offshore Oy (WPD Offshore GmbH) SVEA Vind Offshore Fenno-Skan 2 HVDC Link (800 MW) Islands Sweden to Finland Lumijoki, Varjakka (2MW, 1) Gävle Lumituuli Oy Vyborg Lumijoki, Varjakka (2MW, 1) Lumituuli Oy Raahe / Pertunmatala (48+ MW, 12+) Hamina Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy Oolu Raahe / Ulkonahkiainen (140+ MW, 70) Raahe / Pertunmatala (48+ MW, 12+) Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy Askøy Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy Raahe / Maanahkiaisen Turku (210+MW,70) Skellefteå Rajakiiri OY Raahe / Ulkonahkiainen (140+ MW, 70) Bergen Fjell Suomen Hyötytuuli Oy NE 1 Raahe / Maanahkiaisen Rata Storgrund P2(10+turbines) (210+MW,70) Rewind Offshore AB Lerwick Rajakiiri OY Kokkolan Merituulivoimapuiston Merventoi Oy Helsinki Rata Storgrund P1 (10+ turbines) Mariehamn Rewind Offshore AB Scalloway nd Åla NOAKA (Nth of Alvheim en- ctor & Sth of Askja-Krafla) ed Sw conne Aker, BP, Equinor, Rata Storgrund P2(10+turbines) Inter Rewind Offshore AB Estlink 1 (350 MW) Oslo Finland - Estonia Interconnector Elering Kokkolan Merituulivoimapuiston St Merventoi Oy Rata Storgrund P1 (10+ turbines) Rewind Offshore AB Hanko Inkoo-Raaseporin (180+ MW, 60) FINLAND EPV Energia OY Kristiansund Estlink 2 (650 MW) Finland - Estonia Interconnector Averøya NORWAY Havvind Demonstation Site Elering Umeå Sandøy Havsul (350MW,35+) F BOTHNIA Havgul Nordic AS Loska O Svenska Bjorn Offshore Solid Vind AB Haugesund SeaTwirl S2 (1 MW, 1) Stockholm SeaTwirl AB Negrund (100+ MW, 30+) Tallinn Negrund OÜ Narva Stadt Test Areas (10MW, 2) Kvernevick Engineering Siipyyn/Kristiinakaupunki (240+ MW, 80+) Vindpark Vänern (Gässlingegrund) (30 MW, 10) Suomen Merituuli Oy/EPV Energia/ Helsigem Energia Vindpark Vänern Hiiumaa Avamere Tuulepark (700+ MW, 100+) Paldiski , Hiiumaa Offshore Tuulepark OÜ (Enefit Energia AS) Karmøy Demonstration Site (20 MW, 2) Marine Energy Test Centre (Metcentre) Karmøy Vinkov Apollo Pori Tahkoluoto extension (?MW) TetraSpar Demonstrator (3.6MW, 1) Innogy, ShellKristiansund & Stiesdal Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Pori Tahkoluoto (42MW, 10 ) Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Unitech Zefyros (Hywind Demonstrator) (2.3 MW,Averøya 1) Unitech Offshore Neupokojev Pori 1 (2.3 MW, 1) Havvind Demonstation Site Rennesøy Demonstration Site (10 MW, 2) Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy METCentre - Marine Energy Test Centre Kvitsøy Demonstration Site (10 MW, 2) Hywind Tampen (88MM, 11) Gretas Klackar (?MW) METCentre - Marine Energy Test Centre Equinor, Petoro, Exxon Mobil SVEA Vind Offshore Stromness Stiesdal Demonstrator (3.6 MW, 1) Larvik Kirkwall Stiesdal Offshore Technologies, Shell, innogy Strömstad Sandøy Havsul (350MW,35+) Stavanger Storgrundet (420MW, 70) Havgul Nordic AS Win Win Demonstrator (6 MW, 1) Storgrundet Offshore AB (WPD Offshore GmbH) N 1 DNV-GL Fenno-Skan HVDC Link (500 MW) Utposten II Sweden to Finland N 3 SVEA Vind Offshore N 2 NE 2 Utposten (168MW) ESTONIA SVEA Vind Offshore Nyköping Utknallen SVEA Vind Offshore Fenno-Skan 2 HVDC Link (800 MW) Douneray Tri (5MW, 2) Sweden to Finland Katanes (32MW, 4) Hexicon AB Gävle Floating Power Plant (P80)/DP Energy Långgrund 1(1395MW) SVEA Vind Offshore Askøy Gustav Dahlén Bergen Scrabster Norrköping Långgrund 2 (1330MW) Fjell NE 3 SVEA Vind Offshore Lerwick Egersund Scalloway nd Stadt Test Areas (10MW, 2) Under Constrution Åla r NE 8 NOAKA (Nth of Alvheim en- cto Siipyyn/Kristiinakaupunki (240+ MW, 80+) & Sth of Askja-Krafla) ed ne Kvernevick Engineering Arendal Sw con Aker, BP, Equinor, ter N 4 Kinlochbervie NSN Link Lysekil Suomen Merituuli Oy/EPV Energia/ Helsigem Energia In Moray Firth Eastern Dev. Area (950 MW, 100) England to Norway Interconnector (1,400 MW) Pärnu (Telford, Stevenson, MacColl) National Grid & Norwegian TSO Fällbådan Rewind Offshore AB Inkoo-Raaseporin (180+ MW, 60) EDP Renováveis EPV Energia OY Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. (588 MW, 84) Flekkefjord Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd SeaTwirl S1 (1 MW, 0.03) Stornaway (SSE Renewables/SDIC Group) Telford Offshore WF SeaTwirl AB NE 8 Kristiansand Tuuletraal (380MW, 76) Svenska Bjorn Offshore NE 4 Pori Tahkoluoto extension (?MW) Solid Vind AB Haugesund Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy SeaTwirl S2 (1 MW, 1) Tuuletraal OÜ SeaTwirl AB Stevenson Offshore WF Negrund (100+ MW, 30+) Beatrice Demonstrator (10 MW, 2) Pori Tahkoluoto (42MW, 10 ) A Negrund OÜ Lochinver Cross-Skagerrak Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Vindpark Vänern (Gässlingegrund) (30 MW, 10) Vindpark Vänern Hiiumaa Avamere Tuulepark (700+ MW, 100+) Talisman / SSE Renewables , Hiiumaa Offshore Tuulepark OÜ (Enefit Energia AS) Norway to Denmark HVDC Interconnector (1 - 4) (1,700 MW) Karmøy Demonstration Site (20 MW, 2) Pori 1 (2.3 MW, 1) Karmøy Suomen Hyotytuuli Oy Marine Energy Test Centre (Metcentre) Vinkov Apollo Maccoll Offshore WF Statnett & Energinet.dk TetraSpar Demonstrator (3.6MW, 1) Innogy, Shell & Stiesdal Neupokojev NE 6 Unitech Zefyros (Hywind Demonstrator) (2.3 MW, 1) Unitech Offshore Rennesøy Demonstration Site (10 MW, 2) Moray Firth Western Development Area (360 MW) METCentre - Marine Energy Test Centre Kvitsøy Demonstration Site (10 MW, 2) Lithuanian Sea Wind Park EDP Renovaveis NE 5 METCentre - Marine Energy Test Centre Stromness Stiesdal Demonstrator (3.6 MW, 1) Larvik Liivi laht - Kihnu (400+ MW) Hywind Tampen (88MM, 11) Strömstad Gretas Klackar (?MW) Kirkwall Stiesdal Offshore Technologies, Shell, innogy Equinor, Petoro, Exxon Mobil SVEA Vind Offshore Win Win Demonstrator (6 MW, 1) Stavanger Eesti Energia AS DNV-GL Ullapool Nyköping Douneray Tri (5MW, 2) Katanes (32MW, 4) Hexicon AB Floating Power Plant (P80)/DP Energy Långgrund 1(1395MW) E SVEA Vind Offshore Gustav Dahlén Scrabster Norrköping Långgrund 2 (1330MW) SVEA Vind Offshore Caithness-Moray Link (1200MW) Storgrundet (420MW, 70) Storgrundet Offshore AB (WPD Offshore GmbH) Under Constrution Egersund NSN Link Arendal SSE Kinlochbervie Lysekil Moray Firth Eastern Dev. Area (950 MW, 100) England to Norway Interconnector (1,400 MW) (Telford, Stevenson, MacColl) National Grid & Norwegian TSO Fällbådan EDP Renováveis Rewind Offshore AB Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. (588 MW, 84) Flekkefjord Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Ltd SeaTwirl S1 (1 MW, 0.03) Fenno-Skan HVDC Link (500 MW) Telford Offshore WF Gairloch Utposten II Göteborg Sweden to Finland Stornaway (SSE Renewables/SDIC Group) SeaTwirl AB Västervik Kristiansand Tuuletraal (380MW, 76) SVEA Vind Offshore Tuuletraal OÜ Skagen Utposten (168MW) Stevenson Offshore WF Fraserburgh Lochinver Beatrice Demonstrator (10 MW, 2) Cross-Skagerrak SVEA Vind Offshore Talisman / SSE Renewables Norway to Denmark HVDC Interconnector (1 - 4) (1,700 MW) Maccoll Offshore WF Statnett & Energinet.dk Moray Firth Western Development Area (360 MW) Visby Lithuanian Sea Wind Park EDP Renovaveis Liivi laht - Kihnu (400+ MW) Eesti Energia AS Hirtshals S SKAGERRAK Ullapool The Gotland HVDC Link 1&2 Hywind 2 Demonstration Pilot (30MW) Utknallen Sweden-Gotland Fenno-Skan 2 HVDC Link (800 MW) Frederikshavn OffshoreSVEA Wind Vind Offshore Demo (21.6+MW, 5) SWEDEN Caithness-Moray Link (1200MW) Peterhead Equinor/Masdar European Energy A/S Konti-SkanSweden to Finland1 & 2 InterconnectorSSE (260 MW) Göteborg Gairloch Västervik Denmark to Sweden Interconnector (550 MW) Skagen Fraserburgh Frederikshavn Gävle Oskarshamn (400 MW, 40-45) Hirtshals The Gotland HVDC Link 1&2 E 3 Hywind 2 Demonstration Pilot (30MW) Frederikshavn Offshore Wind Demo (21.6+MW, 5) Sweden-Gotland Rewind Offshore ABPeterhead Equinor/Masdar European Energy A/S Konti-Skan 1 & 2 Interconnector (260 MW) Denmark to Sweden Interconnector (550 MW) Frederikshavn (10.6MW, 4) Frederikshavn Oskarshamn (400 MW, 40-45) TLP Demonstrator Pilot (5MW) Saeby
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Swepol Link Sets New Environmental Standard for HVDC Transmission
    00 ABB Review 4/2001 SwePol Link sets new environmental standard for HVDC transmission Leif Söderberg, Bernt Abrahamsson Six cable links – all of them HVDC (high-voltage direct current) – are currently in service between the power grids of continental Europe and the Nordic region, with another five planned. The latest to be brought on line is the SwePol Link, which connects the electricity networks of Poland and Sweden. It is unique in that, unlike previous installations that depend on electrode stations to transmit the return current under ground or under water, it uses 20-kV XLPE cable to carry this current. The high-voltage HVDC submarine cable used for the SwePol Link is designed for 600 MW at 450 kV. he reason for all these links is the technically feasible to reverse the entire onds to prevent grid failure if the voltage T vital need to secure power system 600 MW power throughput of the in southern Sweden drops below 380 kV. reliability in each of the participating SwePol Link in just 1.3 seconds, although With all previous links of this kind, countries. They make it easier to this is not a feature that will be used in electrode stations off the coast transmit optimize power generation in an area in practice. Nevertheless, a typical emer- the return current under the sea, and this which different countries use different gency power measure could call for a has worked perfectly well (Table 1). The means of power generation and have ∆P ramp-up of 300 MW within a few sec- first such cable link was laid in 1954 different power demand profiles over a 24-hour period.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 756 – 12 April 2021 Bmus
    ISSUE 756 – 12 April 2021 BMUs assemble: ESO Summer Government to BEIS consults on Outlook: electricity introduce Electricity requiring CMUs to demand to be met in System Restoration have BMU IDs all scenarios Standard ENERGY SPECTRUM ISSUE 756 | Pg. 1 ISSUE 756 Contents 4 Energy Perspective BMUs assemble: BEIS consults on requiring CMUs to have BMU IDs 7 Policy Government to introduce Electricity System Restoration Standard Government proposes mandatory climate-related financial disclosures Parliamentary update for weeks 13 and 14 12 Regulation CMA dismisses appeal against Ofgem’s decision on generator residual reforms Ofgem proposes Strategic Innovation Fund challenges 16 Industry Structure ESO Summer Outlook: electricity demand to be met in all scenarios UK carbon emissions were down 10% in 2020 20 Nutwood Octopus Energy: heating goes electric 21 OCS update April 2021 23 Markets ENERGY SPECTRUM ISSUE 756 | Pg. 2 ISSUE 756 Week in review We will be running a short webinar tomorrow morning (13 April) at 9am for Energy Spectrum subscribers, to briefly go through some of the main stories in this issue, with Senior Consulting Analyst James Cunningham discussing the Energy Perspective. We will also look forward to what will be in the next issue. You can sign up here to register. Monday 05/04 – National Grid Electricity System Operator reports that electricity generated was “the greenest it’s ever been” at 1pm on Monday 5 April. The Chancellor chairs a meeting with G7 counterparts Nick Palmer Tuesday 06/04 – Editor where they agreed a green agenda ahead of COP26. The majority of new homes 01603 542125 in England are in the most energy efficient bands, according to recent figures [email protected] published by government.
    [Show full text]
  • Saipem Secured for Dogger Bank
    WEDNESDAY 22 JULY 2020 SAIPEM SECURED FOR DOGGER BANK Saipem contracted to transport and install two offshore platforms for project’s first two phases Dogger Bank Wind Farm is pleased to welcome Saipem to the world’s largest offshore wind farm project. The project is located more than 130km off the North East coast of England and is made up of three phases: Dogger Bank A, Dogger Bank B and Dogger Bank C. In total, the project will be able to power over 4.5 million homes, contributing significantly towards the UK’s net zero ambition. Saipem will utilize its state-of-the-art heavy lift vessel Saipem 7000 to transport and install two offshore HVDC (High Voltage Direct Current) platforms for the first two phases of the offshore wind farm development: Dogger Bank A and Dogger Bank B. Both platforms will consist of a ca. 2,900- tonne jacket and a ca. 8,500-tonne topside. Dogger Bank is the first project to use HVDC technology in the UK’s offshore wind market. Offshore construction at the project will be undertaken in consecutive phases, with onshore construction already underway for Dogger Bank A and B. Steve Wilson, Dogger Bank’s Project Director, said: “We’re really pleased to welcome Saipem to the Dogger Bank Project and look forward to working with them. They have extensive experience in the installation of large offshore platforms which will be essential to ensure the safe and efficient installation of the offshore HVDC platforms for Dogger Bank A and B.” Guido D’Aloisio, Head of Saipem’s newly established Offshore Renewables Business Line commented: “The project with Dogger Bank is a significant endeavour for the UK’s offshore wind industry and we are very pleased to contribute to this strategic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Wind and Solar Power from Cost to Value FULL REPORT Next Generation Wind and Solar Power from Cost to Value INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    FULL REPORT Next Generation Wind and Solar Power From cost to value FULL REPORT Next Generation Wind and Solar Power From cost to value INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. Find solutions to global
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Impact Assessment Scoping Study Proposed Argyll Offshore Wind Farms Argyll Renewables Communities (ARC) 5Th February 2010
    Socio-economic Impact Assessment Scoping Study Proposed Argyll Offshore Wind Farms Argyll Renewables Communities (ARC) 5th February 2010 Source: The Crown Estate Socio-economic Impact Assessment Scoping Study Argyll Renewables Communities (ARC) Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary...............................................................................................................3 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................................9 2: Scoping Study Approach and Context ..........................................................................11 3: The development of offshore wind farms......................................................................17 4: Electricity Generation ..................................................................................................... 25 5: Issues to be considered in offshore wind farm development......................................33 6: Community Benefits........................................................................................................46 7: Tiree Offshore Wind Farm Development ....................................................................... 52 8: Islay Offshore Wind Farm Development........................................................................59 9: Kintyre Offshore Wind Farm Development....................................................................65
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Trust 2020
    Acknowledgments This summary report has been produced by the Carbon Trust, with specific sections informed by studies delivered by the following external technical contractors: • Turbine requirements and foundation scaling: Ramboll • Heavy lift offshore operations: Seaway 7 • Dynamic export cable development: BPP Cable Solutions • Monitoring and inspection: Oceaneering Study results are based on an impartial analysis of primary and secondary sources, including expert interviews. The Carbon Trust would like to thank everyone who has contributed their time and expertise during the preparation and completion of these studies. Special thanks to the following organisations: ABS, AeroDyn, Boskalis, BV, ClassNK, DEIF, DEME Offshore, DNV GL, Glosten, GustoMSC, Ideol, Lloyd's Register, LM Wind Power Blades, MESH Engineering, MHI Vestas, NREL, Principle Power, Royal IHC and Offshore Wind Logistics / Saipem, SBM Offshore, Senvion, Siemens Gamesa, SSB, SwissRe, TheSwitch, Timken, TÜV Nord, Valmont SM Disclaimer The key findings presented in this report represent general results and conclusions that are not specific to individual floating wind concepts. Caution should therefore be taken in generalising findings to specific technologies. It should be noted that information and findings do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting industry partners but are based on independent analysis undertaken by the Carbon Trust and respective external technical contractors. Published: July 2020 The Carbon Trust’s mission is to accelerate the move to a sustainable, low carbon economy. It is a world leading expert on carbon reduction and clean technology. As a not-for-dividend group, it advises governments and leading companies around the world, reinvesting profits into its low carbon mission.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands
    20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands VDE-Bezirksverein Kassel e.V., Universität Kassel am 21.01.2016 Walter Schossig, Gotha VDE Ausschuss Geschichte der Elektrotechnik [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 1 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Chronologie Entstehung von Verbundnetzen Trennung des Deutschen Verbundnetzes Entwicklung in Ost- und Westeuropa Innerdeutscher Stromexport Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Erweiterung des Europäischen Verbundnetzes Ein Auszug der Vortragsfolien. Bei Interesse an Quellenangaben oder weiteren Informationen: [email protected] bzw. www.walter-schossig.de/Literatur [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 2 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Beginn der Stromversorgung 1866-1878 Technisch wirtschaftliche Versuche 1878-1884 Einzelanlagen 1884-1890 Blockanlagen 1890-1900 Ortszentralen 1900-1913 Überlandzentralen 1913-1915 Anfänge der Verbundwirtschaft [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 3 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands < Einzelanlagen 1878-1884 > 1878 St.George Lane Fox (GB) u. Thomas Alva Edison (US) entwickeln erste Pläne zur kollektiven Verteilung des Stromes in ganze Stadtteile, die im Jahre 1881 in Godalming (GB) und ein Jahr später in New York (US) ihre erste Anwendung finden [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de
    [Show full text]
  • CER 2015 National Report to the EC
    CER 2015 National Report to the EC Regulator’s 2015 National Report to the European Commission Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) Ireland August 2016 1 CER 2015 National Report to the EC 1. Foreword Introduction to the report signed by the Commissioners Chairperson Garrett Blaney Commissioner Paul McGowan Commissioner Aoife MacEvilly The Commission for Energy Regulation (“the CER”) is Ireland's independent energy and water regulator. Since its establishment in 1999, the CER’s remit has expanded significantly to encompass a range of economic, customer protection and safety responsibilities in both the energy and water sectors. As an economic regulator, the CER strives to ensure a stable and predictable regulatory regime in Ireland to support efficient investment, competition and consumer protection for energy customers. As the country’s energy safety regulator our core focus is on protecting lives and having a world-class safety record. The CER’s economic role and associated energy policy developments are detailed in this annual report to the European Commission. We report here on the progress made in various areas including wholesale and retail markets regulation, networks regulation and energy safety oversight. Building on our achievements to date and looking forward to new challenges, the CER will continue to endeavour to provide a first-class regulatory service to all its customers in a cost- effective manner. Garrett Blaney Paul McGowan Aoife MacEvilly Chairperson Commissioner Commissioner 2 CER 2015 National Report to the EC 2. Main developments in the gas and electricity markets1 Electricity Networks Revenue Review Project In 2015, the CER completed its five-yearly review of electricity network revenues and charges under the Price Review 4 (PR4) project.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain and Northern Ireland Regulatory Authorities Reports 2017
    Great Britain and Northern Ireland Regulatory Authorities Reports 2017 Regulatory Authorities Report pursuant to section 5ZA of the Utilities Act 2000 and section 6A of the Energy (Northern Ireland) Order 2003 Ofgem/Ofgem E-Serve 9 Millbank, London SW1P 3GE www.ofgem.gov.uk Great Britain and Northern Ireland Regulatory Authorities Reports 2017 Ofgem 2017 National Report to the European Commission Overview The Great Britain (GB) report covers: Developments in the GB energy markets in the calendar year 2016 and the first six months of 2017. In some cases, data is only available for a subset of this period (eg the 2016 calendar year only). Where this is the case, it is clearly stated. The regulation and performance of the GB electricity and gas markets along the themes of network regulation, promoting competition, and security of supply Our compliance with the Electricity and Gas Directives on consumer protection and dispute settlement. Since GB energy markets have been fully liberalised and the regulatory structures in place for a number of years, this report is intended as an updated version of the submissions made since 2007. Finally, for further information on Ofgem’s wider activities, please consult our Annual Report. The 2016-17 Ofgem Annual Report is available at the link below.1 Legal Basis All National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) are obliged to report annually to the European Commission, in accordance with Directives 2009/72/EC (Electricity Directive) and 2009/73/EC (Gas Directive). The structure of the report is agreed at the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER). Ofgem is the GB Office of Gas and Electricity Markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Benefits in the Great Glen Sse Renewables’ Socio-Economic Contribution Generating Benefits in the Great Glen
    GENERATING BENEFITS IN THE GREAT GLEN SSE RENEWABLES’ SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION GENERATING BENEFITS IN THE GREAT GLEN ABOUT SSE RENEWABLES FOREWORD SSE Renewables is a leading developer and operator of renewable Over the years, the purpose of SSE Renewables has gone unchanged – to provide energy, with a portfolio of around 4GW of onshore wind, offshore people with the energy they need – but the world around us is moving quickly. With wind and hydro. Part of the FTSE-listed SSE plc, its strategy is to only 30 years to reach Net Zero carbon targets set by governments in the UK and drive the transition to a zero-carbon future through the world around the world, we believe concerted action against climate change is necessary. class development, construction and operation of renewable energy assets. In response, we have redoubled our efforts to create a low carbon world today and work towards a better world of energy tomorrow. We’ve set a goal to treble our SSE Renewables owns nearly 2GW of onshore wind capacity renewable output to 30TWh a year by 2030, which will lower the carbon footprint of with over 1GW under development. Its 1,459MW hydro portfolio electricity production across the UK and Ireland. Potential future projects in the Great includes 300MW of pumped storage and 750MW of flexible hydro. Glen can make significant contributions towards this goal. Its offshore wind portfolio consists of 580MW across three offshore sites, two of which it operates on behalf of its joint venture partners. For SSE Renewables, building more renewable energy projects in the Great Glen is SSE Renewables has the largest offshore wind development about more than just the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • System Plan 2018 – Electricity and Gas in Denmark 2 System Plan 2018
    SYSTEM PLAN 2018 – ELECTRICITY AND GAS IN DENMARK 2 SYSTEM PLAN 2018 CONTENTS 1. A holistic approach to electricity and gas planning ......................................3 1.1 Energinet’s objectives and the political framework .............................................. 3 1.2 New organisation ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Analysis and planning .................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research and development .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Environmental reporting ..............................................................................................10 1.6 Energy efficiency ............................................................................................................11 2. Electricity .........................................................................................................16 2.1 Security of electricity supply ......................................................................................17 2.2 Resources to safeguard balance and technical quality ......................................22 2.3 Cooperation with other countries ..............................................................................24 2.4 Cooperation with other grid operators ....................................................................29 2.5 Planning for conversion and expansion of electrical installations
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Infrastructure Projects in the Baltic Sea
    FACTS ISSUE 2 | 06 – 2007 FACTS ABOUT THE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE ACROSS THE BALTIC SEA ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN THE BALTIC SEA ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES CAN BE numerous rivers that flow into the sea. Historically, COPED WITH the main challenge for infrastructure projects has therefore been to maintain this balance. Nord Stream is only one of several planned or already operating energy infrastructure projects Energy infrastructure projects like pipelines, wind in the Baltic Sea. In addition to the pipeline from farms and submarine power cables are in general Vyborg to Greifswald, further offshore natural gas smaller than infrastructure projects like bridges, pipelines across the Baltic Sea are under consid- tunnels and harbours. However, the energy projects eration: Poland is interested in a connection from stretch over longer distances and it may therefore Denmark across the Baltic Sea (Baltic Pipe), while be necessary to cross sensitive areas, like munitions Estonia and Finland are also planning a connecting dump sites. pipeline across the sea (Balticconnector). Further- more, subsea power cables and several offshore All use of the sea has an impact; this includes energy wind parks already exist or are planned in the infrastructure as well as ship traffic or traffic infra- Baltic Sea. All of these projects are striving to keep structure. One of the reasons for choosing locations their impact on the environment as low as possible in the sea instead of onshore is the availability of and to preserve the Baltic ecosystem as it is. “Nord space, which is becoming a scarce resource. In this Stream: Facts” talked to Per Jørgensen, a leading context, the impact of large diameter pipelines like international expert in the field of infrastructure, Nord Stream is almost the same as smaller pipeline energy and environment about these projects.
    [Show full text]