DOCSLIB.ORG

Back to Office Report on Joint UN Agencies and Federal Implementing Partners Field Monitoring and Technical Backstopping Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Back to Office Report on Joint UN Agencies and Federal Implementing Partners Field Monitoring and Technical Backstopping Mission Ministry Of Agriculture Back to Office Report on Joint UN Agencies and Federal Implementing Partners Field Monitoring and Technical Backstopping Mission to Somali and Oromia Regions on MDG–F Environment Joint Program Reported By Joint Monitoring Mission Team: Mesfin Berhanu (PCO), Netsanet Deneke (UNEP), Dr. Ahmed Mohammed (FAO), Saba Habtu (EPA), Solomon Tadesse (MOA), Zealbowosen Asfaw (UNDP) and Atlaw Belayneh (FAO). August/ 2012 Project: Enabling Pastoral Communities to adapt to Climate Change and Restoring Rangelands Environment Places Visited: Somali and Oromia Regions – 3 Project Weredas and eight target PAs Duration : July 16 – 30/2012 Mission Members/Agencies: 1. Ato Mesfin Berhanu (PCO), Team Leader 2. Ato Netsanet Deneke (UNEP) 3. Dr. Ahmed Mohammed (FOA - Jijiga office) 4. Ms Saba Habtu (EPA) 5. Ato Solomon Tadesse (MOA) 6. Ato Zealbowosen Asfaw (UNDP) 7. Ato Ahmed Seid (Somali region Environment JP Focal Person) 8. Ato Abas (Somali region LCRDB ) 9. Ato Mohamed Jama (Harshin Wereda Environment JP Officer) 10. Ato Abdurahman Redwan (Aysha Wereda Environment JP Officer) 11. Ato Humnesa G/selasie (Oromia region Environment JP Focal Person) 12. Ato Mohamed Sheko (Teltle Wereda Environment JP Officer) 13. Ato Atlaw Belayneh (FOA - Borena office) BACKGROUND TO THE MISSION The MDG – F Environment Joint Programme has been implemented in four pastoral regions of Ethiopia - Afar, Somali, Oromia & SNNP - since July 8, 2010. Its core objective is to enhance enabling policy environment to effectively plan and execute pastoralist oriented climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at federal, regional and district levels; and pilot measures to enable the pastoral communities develop capacity for managing climate change risks and shocks in six districts. The joint programme (JP) involves the participation of pastoral communities in six targeted Weredas, federal, regional and local government institutions, and three UN agencies (UNDP, UNEP & FAO) within the framework of UNDAF and the “Delivering as one” agenda. In materializing the core objectives, the programme intervention approaches includes: development and implementation of consolidated adaptation programme including alternative income generation opportunities; improving rangeland management; raising awareness of stakeholders on adaptation options; empowering pastoral 1 communities to better participate in decision making related to their livelihoods and integrating these options in relevant sector development plans and policies. In view of addressing the management and coordination of the program, two types of committees, National Steering Committee (NSC) and Program Management Committee (PMC), were established at national level. The NSC’s role is to provide oversight and strategic guidance to the JP. While the PMC, a technical committee at the national level, is entrusted with the key role to provide operational coordination to the JP. The PMC regularly meets on a quarterly basis and address issues related directly to management and implementation of the JP. As part of programme implementation, MTE conducted by external consultant has principally recommended conducting review workshop, developing and implementing improvement plan and strengthened joint field monitoring and technical backstopping services to region and Wereda implementing partners conducted a MTE. Thus, the joint field monitoring and technical backstopping mission was emanated from the MTE. Accordingly, the PCO in consultation with PMC has developed ToR for and mobilized a joint monitoring and technical backstopping mission to Afar, SNNP, Oromia and Somali regions. The mission was executed by two groups comprising participants from each partner UN and government organizations while the participants from PCO handled the role of team leaders. During the field mission, Group one has covered Somali and Oromia regions and three targeted Weredas and eight Kebeles, while Group two covered Afar and SNNP regions and three targeted Weredas and nine Kebeles. The two groups were on mission for 15 days as of July 16, 2012. Presumably, the joint UN agencies and government field monitoring and technical backstopping mission to implementing regions was conducted with the understanding that a combined effort of all participating partners substantially result in greater outcomes and a successful programme implementation during the remaining project life which extends up to end of March, 2013. 1. Objectives of the Mission The joint monitoring and technical backstopping mission principally focused on collecting and analyzing information especially on substantive indicators at the activity, output and outcome levels. To pursue this, a checklist has been used for data collection and showing progress in attaining the programme deliverables. In view of that, the overall objective of the field mission was designed to share information and progress updates; identify constraints and recommend actions and means for speeding up the accomplishment of the programme deliverables in the remaining implementation period; to discuss and facilitate liquidation of aged advance which 2 has impeded further advance transfer and collect financial and progress reports of the 4th quarter; and initiate advance request as per the reprogrammed AWP. Generally, the joint field monitoring function were: • Results oriented , meaning its main goal is to report on progress on the high level of the logical causal chain, especially changes at the output and outcomes level. • Substantive in nature on regards of measuring changes in citizen’s, institutions or any other kind of stakeholder participating in the program. • Aggregational as a mean , is the first element of a causal chain on the whole system that is oriented to learn and to know what works and what does not and improves programme accordingly. 2. Specific Objectives The specific joint monitoring mission objectives were: • Assess progress of the JP in regional IPs, targeted Weredas and Kebeles; and identify challenges and provide technical support to overcome the problems and speed – up implementation. • Discuss technical backstopping required from partner UN agencies and federal government organizations to ascertain programme deliverables. • Ascertain the Reprogrammed Work plan implementation and increase participants’ awareness on the exit strategy, communication and advocacy strategic framework, and responsibilities for final programme evaluation. 3. Field Monitoring Mission Methodology Results-based monitoring and evaluation in this monitoring mission is basically the area where more focus was given to assess the performance of MDGE programme, on the basis of impacts and benefits that /project is expected to produce and examine progress on the high level of the logical causal chain, especially changes at the output and outcomes level. In undertaking the joint monitoring and technical backstopping missions, the team has • Prepared ToR and checklist on major activities of the mission. • Collected data, assessed progresses and discusses with IP regions and targeted Weredas and Kebeles on physical activities conducted, fund arrival, procurement, fund utilization, awareness of beneficiary communities, etc. 3 • Discussed and identified technical backstopping needs of Regions, Weredas and targeted Kebeles. • Ascertained action plan preparation and proper implantation of the Reprogrammed WP, oriented RIPs and WIPs on exit strategy, communication, and advocacy framework. • Identified challenges encountered and recommend solution; and provided technical support to overcome the challenges. • Identified best practices developed during the interventions and suggest possible dissemination for further scaling up. • Produced back to office report. 4. Mission Findings on Progresses Made in Implementation Since the deployment of the mission team in both regions a multiple of approach were used to explore information onto the executed activities and measure the results in terms of progress on the high level of the logical causal chain, especially changes at the output and outcomes level. Accordingly, the team made its first entry by briefing with the Somali LCNRD bureau. Secondly travelled to Harshin and Aysha Weredas where the Environment JP has been implemented since 2010. Following the completion of the Somali trip, the mission has traveled to Teltele Wereda of Oromia region for similar monitoring and technical backstopping mission. On arrival to Somali Regional State, Jijiga, the mission team conducted briefing session on the presence of Mr. Abdulkedir Mohamed Farah, deputy head of Somali LCNRD bureau. The briefing includes explanation of the objective of the joint monitoring mission, orientation of exit strategy, sharing information on the schedule of upcoming joint monitoring plan, reminding the preparation of programme closure plan and handing over requirements, and discussion on major challenges encountered. After briefing session, based on sent checklist, the focal person of Somali region, Mr. Ahmed Seid, has provided performance report to the mission members. From the report the mission team has realized that the Harshin and Ayesha CC adaptation action plan preparation, which is previously reported by EPA as completed activity, is not yet accomplished and need EPA’s close follow-up of the case to immediately rectify the problem associated with budget utilization. In reflection to the mission briefing, the deputy bureau head has acknowledged the mission presence at this point in time and considerable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Dire Dawa, Ethiopia / Mobiliseyourcity Global Monitor 2021 69
    Factsheet: Dire Dawa, Ethiopia / MobiliseYourCity Global Monitor 2021 69 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia Partner city Status of the project: ongoing technical assistance Basic Information Urban area: 70 km2 Population: 320,000 | Growth rate: 4% GDP per capita: USD 855.8 (2019) Modal Share Informal public transport: 42% Walking: 46% Private cars: 4% Private motorbikes or 2-wheelers: 1% Other: 8% National GHG emissions per capita: 1.60 (tCO2eq) Exposure to climate change: HIGH Region capital city Context Located on a large flat plain between Addis Ababa and Djiouti, Dire Dawa is meant to become the main economical hub of eastern Ethiopia. Nowadays, it presents a high density of commercial activities, including markets that generate important flows of goods and people at different scale, putting some pressure over roads and public spaces. In the midterm, national freight transit shall boom, along with the development of the national road network and the integration of the new railway into the logistic system. 477 000 trips are made daily in Dire Dawa. Mobility patterns reveal a relatively high propension to move (1.8 daily trips per inhabitants). Dire Dawa is located on a secondary national/international freight corridor between Addis Abeba and Djibouti, meaning that a signifcant volume of trucks transits through the city. Dire Dawa currently does not have any transport master plan. Two railway lines currently serve Dire Dawa. The century old Ethio-Djiboutian railway is now nearly disused and only keeps one or two regional services between Dire Dawa and Dewele at the Djibutian border. The new Chinese built railway line between Addis Abeba and Djibouti is operating since 2018 and is increasing both passenger and freight services with a planned dry port near the new station.
    [Show full text]
  • Irregular Migration from Ethiopia to the Gulf States
    MIGRATION POLICY CENTRE Irregular Migration from Ethiopia to the Gulf States Bina Fernandez Chapter in the volume: Skilful Survivals: Irregular Migration to the Gulf edited by Philippe Fargues and Nasra M. Shah BOOK CHAPTER This is a chapter in the volume: Philippe Fargues and Nasra M. Shah (eds.),Skilful Survivals: Irregular Migration to the Gulf, Gulf Labour Markets and Migration (GLMM) Programme, Gulf Research Center Cambridge, 2017. For other chapters and the entire volume, please refer to www.gulfmigration.eu. Terms of use: By using any information from Gulf Labour Markets and Migration programme publications, the user: (a) acknowledges having read the legal notices concerning copyright, terms of use and disclaimers and agrees to comply with them in full; (b) agrees to assure himself/herself whether and to what extent copyrights exist on information published by the GLMM prior to using this information; (c) agrees not to use information published by GLMM in any way that would result in the infringement of existing copyrights; (d) agrees to always follow precisely and fully the citation instructions provided by the GLMM. GLMM publications may be copied and distributed only in their entirety and together with any copyright statements they may contain, as long as they are properly attributed and used for non-commercial, educational, or public policy purposes. Photographs, logos, graphs, tables or any other images from the GLMM publications may not be used separately. Copyright: © European University Institute (EUI) and Gulf Research Center (GRC), 2017. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of European University Institute and Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in Ethiopia: Focus MEKELLE December 2012 INVEST in ETHIOPIA: FOCUS MEKELLE
    Mekelle Invest in Ethiopia: Focus MEKELLE December 2012 INVEST IN ETHIOPIA: FOCUS MEKELLE December 2012 Millennium Cities Initiative, The Earth Institute Columbia University New York, 2012 DISCLAIMER This publication is for informational This publication does not constitute an purposes only and is meant to be purely offer, solicitation, or recommendation for educational. While our objective is to the sale or purchase of any security, provide useful, general information, product, or service. Information, opinions the Millennium Cities Initiative and other and views contained in this publication participants to this publication make no should not be treated as investment, representations or assurances as to the tax or legal advice. Before making any accuracy, completeness, or timeliness decision or taking any action, you should of the information. The information is consult a professional advisor who has provided without warranty of any kind, been informed of all facts relevant to express or implied. your particular circumstances. Invest in Ethiopia: Focus Mekelle © Columbia University, 2012. All rights reserved. Printed in Canada. ii PREFACE Ethiopia, along with 189 other countries, The challenges that potential investors adopted the Millennium Declaration in would face are described along with the 2000, which set out the millennium devel- opportunities they may be missing if they opment goals (MDGs) to be achieved by ignore Mekelle. 2015. The MDG process is spearheaded in Ethiopia by the Ministry of Finance and The Guide is intended to make Mekelle Economic Development. and what Mekelle has to offer better known to investors worldwide. Although This Guide is part of the Millennium effort we have had the foreign investor primarily and was prepared by the Millennium Cities in mind, we believe that the Guide will be Initiative (MCI), which is an initiative of of use to domestic investors in Ethiopia as The Earth Institute at Columbia University, well.
    [Show full text]
  • CORE Group Polio Project FY20 Annual Report
    POLIO ● core group polio project annual report fy20 Project Responding to Disruption with Resilience and Adaptation 1 core group polio project fy20 Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 4 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................. 5 Objective 1. Build effective partnerships with PVOs, NGO(s), and international, national and regional agencies involved in polio eradication ........................................................................................... 6 Children in Uganda receive Objective 2. Support PVO/NGO efforts to strengthen national and regional immunization systems to vaccines for oral polio vaccine and achieve polio eradication ............................................................................................................. 9 measles during a CGPP-supported Objective 3. Support PVO/NGO involvement in national and regional planning and implementation of SIA held in October 2020. supplemental polio immunization. ................................................................................................ 14 Photo by CGPP Uganda. Objective
    [Show full text]
  • 30 August 2020 Data As Reported By: 17:00; 30 August 2020
    WEEKLY BULLETIN ON OUTBREAKS AND OTHER EMERGENCIES Week 35: 24 - 30 August 2020 Data as reported by: 17:00; 30 August 2020 REGIONAL OFFICE FOR Africa WHO Health Emergencies Programme 2 113 105 10 New events Ongoing events Outbreaks Humanitarian crises 44 146 1 501 Algeria 2 797 96 1 0 682 0 7 022 159 Gambia 7 0 1 012 77 1 175 69 1 0 Mauritania 68 0 2 773 126 Senegal 2 079 4 318 0Eritrea 13 556 284 Niger 8 483 39 Mali 6 163 0 3 852 40 1 0 Burkina Faso 82 1 10 0 Cabo Verdé Guinea 1 368 55 54 0 Chad 51 122 793 5 644 14 8 0 53 865 1 013 1 1 10 0 29 0 Nigeria 9 371 59Côte d’Ivoire South Sudan 1 873 895 15 4 700 61 337 2 1 065 233 19 409 414 11 427 176 Guinea-Bissau Ghana 17 0 1 150 0 29 0 Central African 29 0 Liberia 17 948 115 22 0 2 527 47 Benin Cameroon Republic 916 2 Ethiopia 2 149 33 44 205 276 420 14 3 0 Sierra léone Togo 26 467 118 Uganda 980 45 Democratic Republic 40 18 742 3 192 5 1 423 13 470 2 34 057 574 1 396 27 of Congo 2 022 70 Gabon Congo 2 888 30 3 1 682 6 Kenya 109 47 1 303 82 711 13 Legend 2 145 40 1 1 293 7 71 0 8 505 53 69 249 987 Rwanda Measles Humanitarian crisis 4 020 16 3 979 78 13 421 190 Burundi 896 15 131 0 Monkeypox Hepatitis E 445 1 Sao Tome 9 994 255 Seychelles 133 0 Tanzania 989 0 Lassa fever Yellow fever and Principe 509 21 91 17 Dengue fever Cholera 1 220 5 3 567 132 4 941 83 Angola Ebola virus disease cVDPV2 Comoros Equatorial 5 536 174 423 7 2 0 Chikungunya Guinea 133 0 862 0 696 0 Floods Malawi 2 624 107 Zambia Mozambique COVID-19 Leishmaniasis 12 025 287 Zimbabwe 2 625 21 Madagascar Anthrax Plague Namibia
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE SECOND HALF OF YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) September, 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF LOCAL NAMES .................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. 2 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 7 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................. 11 SOMALI .............................................................................................. 11 OROMIA ............................................................................................. 16 TIGRAY ............................................................................................... 22 AMHARA ............................................................................................ 25 AFAR .................................................................................................. 28 SNNP .................................................................................................. 32 Annex – 1: NEEDY POPULATION AND FOOD REQUIREMENT BY WOREDA (Second half of 2013) ............................................................................ 35 0 | P a g e GLOSSARY
    [Show full text]
  • D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1
    D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1. Tigrey No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Adwa 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 2(*) Hawzen 12 3(*) Wukro 7 Per Feasibility Study 4(*) Samre 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Alamata 10 Total 55 1 Tahtay Adiyabo 8 2 Medebay Zana 10 3 Laelay Mayechew 10 4 Kola Temben 11 5 Abergele 7 Per Filed Survey by ETC 6 Ganta Afeshum 15 7 Atsbi Wenberta 9 8 Enderta 14 9(*) Hintalo Wajirat 16 10 Ofla 15 Total 115 1 Kafta Humer 5 2 Laelay Adiyabo 8 3 Tahtay Koraro 8 4 Asegede Tsimbela 10 5 Tselemti 7 6(**) Welkait 7 7(**) Tsegede 6 8 Mereb Lehe 10 9(*) Enticho 21 10(**) Werie Lehe 16 Per Filed Survey by ETC 11 Tahtay Maychew 8 12(*)(**) Naeder Adet 9 13 Degua temben 9 14 Gulomahda 11 15 Erob 10 16 Saesi Tsaedaemba 14 17 Alage 13 18 Endmehoni 9 19(**) Rayaazebo 12 20 Ahferom 15 Total 208 1/14 Tigrey D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 2. Affar No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Ayisaita 3 2 Dubti 5 Per Filed Survey by ETC 3 Chifra 2 Total 10 1(*) Mile 1 2(*) Elidar 1 3 Koneba 4 4 Berahle 4 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Amibara 5 6 Gewane 1 7 Ewa 1 8 Dewele 1 Total 18 1 Ere Bti 1 2 Abala 2 3 Megale 1 4 Dalul 4 5 Afdera 1 6 Awash Fentale 3 7 Dulecha 1 8 Bure Mudaytu 1 Per Filed Survey by ETC 9 Arboba Special Woreda 1 10 Aura 1 11 Teru 1 12 Yalo 1 13 Gulina 1 14 Telalak 1 15 Simurobi 1 Total 21 2/14 Affar D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Cross-Border Livestock Trade Across Dry Land Borders of Ethiopia: the Trends and Implications
    Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research 2018; 7(2): 36-42 Available online at: www.jsirjournal.com Review Article A Review on Cross-Border Livestock Trade Across ISSN 2320-4818 Dry Land Borders of Ethiopia: The Trends and JSIR 2018; 7(2): 36-42 © 2017, All rights reserved Implications Received: 24-04-2018 Accepted: 11-09-2018 Angassa Tesfaye, Negassi Amaha Angassa Tesfaye Abstract Department of Animal Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia This review paper is aimed at, reviewing trade routes and border marketing centers, trends and implications of cross-border livestock trade (CBLT) along borderlands of Ethiopia. Traded across different corridors of Negassi Amaha borderland, Ethiopia’s CBLT were traditionally, destined to middle east countries, were the Eastern trade Department of Animal Sciences, Haramaya University, Haramaya, corridor with Somalia involves massive border crossing livestock trade and stand first in terms of traded Ethiopia volume and values. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of CBLT along Sudan, Kenya and Djibouti corridors were also carried out across northwestern, southern and northeastern parts of the country respectively. Livestock sector in Ethiopia, supporting more than 65% of the population and contributes more than 12–15% of total export earnings of the country. However, in recent year, the evidences show that, the trends of official livestock export were declining while, informal export is exponentially increasing. The role of CBLT, on the livelihoods of herders and economy of the country were loomed in the forms of its short- or long-term impacts. In short term, it improves the livelihoods of herders and/or traders through; assisting food security in supplying foods item to the food deficit areas, raising incomes to herders/traders through selling their animals at border crossing/international markets and creates employment opportunity for traders, trekkers or brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • Addis Ababa City Structure Plan
    Addis Ababa City Structure Plan DRAFT FINAL SUMMARY REPORT (2017-2027) AACPPO Table of Content Part I Introduction 1-31 1.1 The Addis Ababa City Development Plan (2002-2012) in Retrospect 2 1.2 The National Urban System 1.2 .1 The State of Urbanization and Urban System 4 1.2 .2 The Proposed National Urban System 6 1.3 The New Planning Approach 1.3.1 The Planning Framework 10 1.3.2 The Planning Organization 11 1.3.3 The Legal framework 14 1.4 Governance and Finance 1.4.1 Governance 17 1.4.2 Urban Governance Options and Models 19 1.4.3 Proposal 22 1.4.4 Finance 24 Part II The Structure Plan 32-207 1. Land Use 1.1 Existing Land Use 33 1.2 The Concept 36 1.3 The Proposal 42 2. Centres 2.1 Existing Situation 50 2.2 Hierarchical Organization of Centres 55 2.3 Major Premises and Principles 57 2.4 Proposals 59 2.5 Local development Plans for centres 73 3. Transport and the Road Network 3.1 Existing Situation 79 3.2 New Paradigm for Streets and Mobility 87 3.3 Proposals 89 4. Social Services 4.1 Existing Situation 99 4.2 Major Principles 101 4.3 Proposals 102 i 5. Municipal Services 5.1 Existing Situation 105 5.2 Main Principles and Considerations 107 5.3 Proposals 107 6. Housing 6.1 Housing Demand 110 6.2 Guiding Principles, Goals and Strategies 111 6.3 Housing Typologies and Land Requirement 118 6.4 Housing Finance 120 6.5 Microeconomic Implications 121 6.6 Institutional Arrangement and Regulatory Intervention 122 6.7 Phasing 122 7.
    [Show full text]
  • European Academic Research, Vol III, Issue 3, June 2015 Murty, M
    EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH Vol. III, Issue 10/ January 2016 Impact Factor: 3.4546 (UIF) ISSN 2286-4822 DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+) www.euacademic.org An Economic Analysis of Djibouti - Ethiopia Railway Project Dr. DIPTI RANJAN MOHAPATRA Associate Professor (Economics) School of Business and Economics Madawalabu University Bale Robe, Ethiopia Abstract: Djibouti – Ethiopia railway project is envisaged as a major export and import connection linking land locked Ethiopia with Djibouti Port in the Red Sea’s international shipping routes. The rail link is of utter significance both to Ethiopia and to Djibouti, as it would not only renovate this tiny African nation into a multimodal transport hub but also will provide competitive advantage over other regional ports. The pre-feasibility study conducted in 2007 emphasized the importance of the renovation of the project from economic and financial angle. However, as a part of GTP of Ethiopia this project has been restored with Chinese intervention. The operation expected in 2016. The proposed project is likely to provide multiple benefits such as time saving, reduction in road maintenance costs, fuel savings, employment generation, reduction in pollution, foreign exchange earnings and revenue generation. These benefits will accrue to government, passengers, general public and to society in nutshell. Here an economic analysis has been carried out to evaluate certain benefits that the project will realize against the cost streams in 25 years. The NPV of the cost streams @ 12% calculated to be 6831.30 million US$. The economic internal rate of return of investments will be 18.90 percent. Key words: EIRR, NPV, economic viability, sensitivity analysis JEL Classification: D6, R4, R42 11376 Dipti Ranjan Mohapatra- An Economic Analysis of Djibouti - Ethiopia Railway Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION: The Djibouti-Ethiopia Railway (Chemin de Fer Djibouti- Ethiopien, or CDE) Project is 784 km railway running from Djibouti to Addis Ababa via Dire Dawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving up Or Moving Out? a Rapid Livelihoods and Conflict Analysis in Mieso-Mulu Woreda, Shinile Zone, Somali Region, Ethiopia
    A PR I L 2 0 1 0 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice Moving Up or Moving Out? A Rapid Livelihoods and Conflict Analysis in Mieso-Mulu Woreda, Shinile Zone, Somali Region, Ethiopia Andy Catley and Alula Iyasu ©2010 Feinstein International Center and Mercy Corps. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image files from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 200 Boston Ave., Suite 4800 Medford, MA 02155 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fic.tufts.edu Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following Mercy Corps staff who assisted with organisation of the study or who facilitated focus group discussions in Mulu: Mesfin Ayele, Mohammed Haji, Niama Ibrahim, Berhanu Esehete, and Yigezu Solomon. Other Mercy Corps staff provided helpful advice on the design of the work or commented on the draft report, including Abdi Aden, Fasil Demeke, Rafael Velaquez, Nigist Tilahun, and Sarah Gibbons. Demeke Eshete of Save the Children UK provided food economy reports for Shinile Zone. We are also grateful to participants in focus group discussions in Mulu and to the various government staff who provided information and joined the livelihoods analysis training.
    [Show full text]