The Term Diplegia Should Be Abandoned

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Term Diplegia Should Be Abandoned 286 CONTROVERSY Neurology his own classification—particularly the ................................................................................... unsatisfactory nature of the dividing line Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.4.286 on 1 April 2003. Downloaded from between diplegia and quadriplegia and the fact that many children change The term diplegia should be categories as they grow older. In 2000, the European Collaboration abandoned SCPE10 did not include diplegia in its classification because of the inherent A F Colver, T Sethumadhavan ambiguities. Not surprisingly, all this confusion is ................................................................................... mirrored in the standard paediatric text- Use of the term has served to confuse classification and books. Forfar and Arniel16 regard diplegia as a obscure interpretation of epidemiological and clinical studies clear entity in which the legs are more affected than the arms; the more affected rom the writings of Freud onwards more a descriptive grid than a classifi- the upper limbs, the lower is intelligence. there is broad agreement on the cation, and for him diplegia was “paraly- It is linked to specific cerebral patholo- Fdefinition of cerebral palsy (CP) but sis affecting like parts on either side of gies, which are themselves linked to pre- attempts to classify it, based on brain the body”. mature delivery or asphyxia. In Nelson,17 711 pathology, timing of postulated insult, In Ingram’s classification of 1955, diplegia is spasticity of just the legs, with aetiology, or clinical syndrome, taking spastic diplegia was described “as a con- good prognosis for intelligence and account of one or more of neurological dition of more or less symmetrical pare- seizures. The lesions in the brain are findings, distribution, and associated sis of cerebral origin more severe in the similar in diplegia and quadriplegia, impairments, have been less successful. lower limbs than the upper and dating except for more extensive necrotic de- Any syndrome must be clearly de- from birth or shortly thereafter”. He generation of white matter which coa- fined, meaningful, reliable, and used qualified the disorder with an associ- lesces into cystic cavities in quadriplegia. consistently by different people. A few ation with prematurity and lesser inci- 18 In Rudolph, diplegia requires the legs to CP syndromes such as choreoathetosis dence of mental retardation, pseudobul- have greater spasticity and weakness with deafness caused by bilirubin en- bar palsy, and seizures compared to than the arms. The children are fre- cephalopathy and ataxia caused by hy- quadriplegics. He also described its clini- quently preterm and the deficit is more drocephalus have stood the test of time cal evolution through the stages of hypo- apparent in wrist extensors and activi- and are reviewed by Ingram.1 However, tonia, dystonia, and rigidity.12 Later in his ties of daily living such as self feeding, we think that diplegia is not a descrip- 1966 review article “The neurology of drawing, or writing. Quadriplegia is tion of a valid category or syndrome and cerebral palsy”, he re-emphasised what determined by symmetric impairment of use of the term has served to confuse he regarded as the unequivocal distinc- classification and obscure interpretation tion between spastic diplegia and other all four extremities; growth retardation, 13 mental retardation, language disorders, of epidemiological and clinical studies. bilateral cerebral palsies. 19 We draw on historical papers and our In 1959 in England,8 The Little Club and seizures are common. Avery de- own new analyses of recent published presented a definition and classification scribes spastic diplegia as restricted to http://adc.bmj.com/ epidemiological papers to argue that the of cerebral palsy: “In diplegia there is bilateral spastic involvement of the lower term diplegia should be abandoned. affection of the muscles of all four limbs. extremities, often associated with nor- The lower limbs are the more affected.” mal cognitive function. Quadriplegia is HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF USE The classification had an additional spastic involvement of the extremities, OF TERM DIPLEGIA category “atonic diplegia”, but the rea- often with orobuccal musculature ren- Table 1 summarises important classifica- soning presented in the article for this dering swallowing and talking difficult. tions of the past 150 years which we category and other aspects of the classi- shall discuss with respect to their use of fication are difficult to follow. By 1964 THE PRESENT SITUATION on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. the term diplegia. the problems were apparent, and an The most recent International Classifi- 20 William Little2 first described the syn- annotation14 recommended that descrip- cation of Diseases has a category “spas- drome complex of cerebral palsy in 1862. tion should be based on clinical features tic diplegia” which it does not further His paper proposed a link between and that attempts to define certain define and another category “diplegia of abnormal parturition, difficult labour, syndromes combining clinical aetiologi- upper limbs”! However the common premature birth, asphyxia neonatorum, cal and pathological features should be ground in the papers we have just and physical deformities, which he de- avoided. In particular the idea of a diple- discussed appears to be that diplegia is a scribed lucidly. He did not use the term gic syndrome should be avoided. spastic form of cerebral palsy with lower diplegia. In their first epidemiological report in limbs more affected than upper limbs. In 1890, Sachs and Peterson proposed 1975, the Hagbergs9 used a classification It is however unclear whether pres- a classification which linked clinical syn- with a definition of diplegia similar to ence or absence of prematurity, seizures, drome to timing of the insult,3 and intro- Ingram’s. Hypertonic cases were diplegic or mental retardation is relevant to the duced diplegia and paraplegia as sepa- where the lower limbs were more af- definition or just an association. For rate categories. fected than the upper ones. Cases were example, if a child has severe four limb In 1893, Freud considered cerebral regarded as diplegic even when they involvement with upper limbs slightly palsy to be caused not just at parturition exhibited severe generalised damage and less affected than lower limbs, does pres- but also sooner in pregnancy because of “might have been classified as tetraple- ence or absence of the above features “deeper effects that influenced the devel- gia by other investigators”. Their classifi- such as mental retardation determine opment of the foetus”.4 Freud was the cation had an additional category of whether this is classified as diplegia or first to use the term “cerebral diplegia”, “ataxic diplegia” where the children had quadriplegia? which covered all bilateral cerebral pal- diplegia with ataxic traits, especially Even more importantly, what does sies, including non-spastic types. dysynergia and intention tremor in the “more affected” mean and should the Further classifications appeared in the upper limbs. However by 1989, comparison be based on clinical signs or 1950s.56As table 1 shows, Minear’s6 was Hagberg15 appreciated the limitations of function? If comparison is based on www.archdischild.com CONTROVERSY 287 Table 1 Classifications of cerebral palsy Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.4.286 on 1 April 2003. Downloaded from Reference Year Classification Little2 1862 Hemiplegic rigidity Paraplegic rigidity Generalised rigidity Disordered movements without rigidity Sachs and Petersen3 1890 Paralysis of intrauterine origin Diplegia Paraplegia Hemiplegia Birth palsies Diplegia Paraplegia Hemiplegia Diataxia (ataxia) Acute acquired palsies Hemiplegia Paraplegia Diplegia Choreo-athetoid Freud4 1893 Unilateral disorders—hemiplegia Right or left Bilateral disorders—diplegia Generalised rigidity Paraplegic rigidity Bilateral hemiplegia Choreo-athetosis Others Wyllie5 1951 Congenital symmetric diplegia Congenital paraplegia Quadriplegia or bilateral hemiplegia Hemiplegia with additional qualifications Choreo-athetoid cerebral palsy referring to all categories Mixed forms of cerebral palsy Ataxic cerebral palsy Atonic diplegia Minear(6) 1956 A. Physiological Spasticity, athetosis, rigidity, ataxia, tremor, atonia, mixed, unclassified B. Topographical Monoplegia, diplegia, paraplegia, hemiplegia, triplegia, quadriplegia C. Aetiological Prenatal, natal anoxia, postnatal, cause described D. Trauma Cause described E. Supplemental Psychological evaluation Physical status, convulsive seizures, posture and locomotive behaviour pattern, eye-hand behaviour pattern, visual status, auditory status, speech disturbances F. Neuroanatomical G. Functional capacity Class I–IV H. Therapeutic Class I–IV http://adc.bmj.com/ Neurology Extent Severity Ingram7 1955 Hemiplegia Right or left Mild Moderate Severe Double hemiplegia Mild Moderate Severe Diplegia on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Hypotonic Paraplegia Mild Dystonic Triplegia Moderate Rigid or Spastic Tetraplegia Severe Ataxia Cerebellar Unilateral Mild Vestibular Bilateral Moderate Severe Ataxic diplegia Hypotonic Paraplegia Mild Spastic Triplegia Moderate Tetraplegia Severe Dyskinesia Dystonic Monoplegia Mild Choreoid Hemiplegia Moderate Athetoid Triplegia Severe Tension Tetraplegia Tremor Other Little Club8 1959 Spastic cerebral palsy Hemiplegia Diplegia Double hemiplegia Dystonic cerebral
Recommended publications
  • The Epidemiology of the Cerebral Palsies
    Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 87 The Epidemiology of the Cerebral Palsies Edited by FIONA STANLEY EVA ALBERMAN 1984 Spastics International Medical Publications OXFORD: Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. PHILADELPHIA: J. B. Lippincott Co. CHAPTER 11 Prenatal and Perinatal Risk Factors in a Survey of 681 Swedish Cases BENGT and GUDRUN HAGBERG I, that am curtail'd of this fair proportion, Cheated of feature by dissembling nature, , Deform'd, unfinish'd, sent before my time Into this breathing world, scarce half made up, And that so lamely and unfashionable That dogs bark at me, as I halt by them. Shakespeare, Richard III Introduction The aim of this chapter is to try and shed light on more specific aspects of the main groups of prenatal causes and risk factors for cerebral palsy, their mutual importance, and particularly their relationship to superimposed detrimental perinatal events. This survey is based on an investigation of 681 cases born in Sweden from 1959 to 1976. In our original retrospective analysis of causes of cerebral palsy (Hagberg et al. 1975a), it was found necessary to make certain generalisations about the aetiological groupings. Only the risk factor that was considered to be the predominating possible cause was used for classification. There is no doubt that this oversimplifies the issue as it neglects the complex network of different interacting detrimental risk factors that are present in the majority of cases, and in all probability underlie the development of brain lesions. Definitions For the purpose of the Swedish investigation, the following definition of cerebral palsy was used: a non-progressive 'disorder of movement and posture due to a defect or lesion of the immature brain' (Bax 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Pathophysiology of Dysarthria in Cerebral Palsy
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.44.11.1013 on 1 November 1981. Downloaded from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1981 ;44:1013-1019 Pathophysiology of dysarthria in cerebral palsy PETER D NEILSON, NICHOLAS J O'DWYER From The Spastic Centre Research Unit, Department of Neurology, The Prince Henry Hospital and School of Medicine, University of New South Wales SUMMARY Electromyograms were recorded with hooked-wire electrodes from sixteen lip, tongue and jaw muscles in six normal and seven cerebral palsied adult subjects during a variety of speech and non-speech tasks. The recorded patterns of muscle activity fail to support a number of theories concerning the pathophysiology of dysarthria in cerebral palsy. There was no indication of weakness in individual articulator muscles. There was no evidence of uncontrolled sustained background activity or of abnormal tonic stretch reflex responses in lip or tongue muscles. Primitive or patho- logical reflexes could not be elicited by orofacial stimulation. No imbalance between positive and negative oral responses was observed. The view that random involuntary movement disrupts essentially normal voluntary control in athetosis was not supported. Each cerebral palsied subject displayed an idiosyncratic pattern of abnormal muscle activity which was reproduced across repeti- guest. Protected by copyright. tions of the same phrase, indicating a consistent defect in motor programming. There has been little experimental verification of disruption of the voluntary control of speech muscles existing theories concerning the pathophysiology of by random involuntary activity of the type associated dysarthria in cerebral palsy. The present study with athetosis.6 12 15 provides electromyographic (EMG) data in the light EMG studies of the speech musculature in cerebral of which these theories can be examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcomes Following Unilateral Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy In
    Outcomes and Perioperative Considerations for Unilateral Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Children with Spastic Hemiplegia with Pre- and Postoperative Quantitative Gait Analysis Christine Hunt, D.O.1, Nicholas Wetjen, M.D.2, Kenton Kaufman, Ph.D.3, Krista Coleman Wood, P.T., Ph.D.3, Joline Brandenburg, M.D.1, Bradford Landry, D.O.1 1Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Abstract Background & Objectives Methods Results: Postoperative Gait Analysis Discussion Background: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a Background Preoperative Baseline Characteristics Patient 1: Right SDR December 2013 • Pre-SDR, patients undergo an in-depth review of their medical procedure used to improve function, decrease pain and • Several human trials examining outcomes in SDR in children • Patient 1: 6 year old male, spastic right hemiplegia • 62.5% of sensory dorsal rootlets sectioned ( L2 to S1) history and imaging studies, consultation with a physiatrist, reduce spasticity in children and adults with cerebral palsy or neurosurgeon, and orthopedic surgeon, and evaluation with PT with spastic diplegia have been conducted, but there is a • GMFCS Level II • Normalized velocity and stride length stroke. Positive outcomes have been reported by numerous and OT. Testing includes QGA, MRI lumbar spine and brain, paucity of data describing outcomes following SDR for • 12 series of botulinum toxin • Improved hip and knee kinematics and kinetics authors but pediatric
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebral Palsy the ABC's of CP
    Cerebral Palsy The ABC’s of CP Toni Benton, M.D. Continuum of Care Project UNM HSC School of Medicine April 20, 2006 Cerebral Palsy Outline I. Definition II. Incidence, Epidemiology and Distribution III. Etiology IV. Types V. Medical Management VI. Psychosocial Issues VII. Aging Cerebral Palsy-Definition Cerebral palsy is a symptom complex, (not a disease) that has multiple etiologies. CP is a disorder of tone, posture or movement due to a lesion in the developing brain. Lesion results in paralysis, weakness, incoordination or abnormal movement Not contagious, no cure. It is static, but it symptoms may change with maturation Cerebral Palsy Brain damage Occurs during developmental period Motor dysfunction Not Curable Non-progressive (static) Any regression or deterioration of motor or intellectual skills should prompt a search for a degenerative disease Therapy can help improve function Cerebral Palsy There are 2 major types of CP, depending on location of lesions: Pyramidal (Spastic) Extrapyramidal There is overlap of both symptoms and anatomic lesions. The pyramidal system carries the signal for muscle contraction. The extrapyramidal system provides regulatory influences on that contraction. Cerebral Palsy Types of brain damage Bleeding Brain malformation Trauma to brain Lack of oxygen Infection Toxins Unknown Epidemiology The overall prevalence of cerebral palsy ranges from 1.5 to 2.5 per 1000 live births. The overall prevalence of CP has remained stable since the 1960’s. Speculations that the increased survival of the VLBW preemies would cause a rise in the prevalence of CP have proven wrong. Likewise the expected decrease in CP as a result of C-section and fetal monitoring has not happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to a Patient with Hemiplegia and Monoplegia
    CHAPTER Approach to a Patient with Hemiplegia and Monoplegia 27 Sudhir Kumar, Subhash Kaul INTRODUCTION 4. Injury to multiple cervical nerve roots. Monoplegia and hemiplegia are common neurological 5. Functional or psychogenic. symptoms in patients presenting to the emergency department as well as outpatient department. Insidious onset, gradually progressive monoplegia affecting lower limb can be caused by the following Monoplegia refers to weakness of one limb (either arm or conditions: leg) and hemiplegia refers to weakness of one arm and leg on the same side of body (either left or right side). 1. Tumor of the contralateral frontal lobe. There are a variety of underlying causes for monoplegia 2. Tumor of spinal cord at thoracic or lumbar level. and hemiplegia. The causes differ in different age groups. 3. Chronic infection of brain (frontal lobe) or spinal The causes also differ depending on the onset, progression cord (thoracic or lumbar level), such as tuberculous. and duration of weakness. Therefore, one needs to adopt a systematic approach during history taking and 4. Lumbosacral-plexopathy, due to diabetes mellitus. examination in order to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Insidious onset, gradually progressive monoplegia, Appropriate investigations after these would confirm the affecting upper limb, can be caused by one of the following diagnosis. conditions: The aim of this chapter is to systematically look at the 1. Tumor of the contralateral parietal lobe. differential diagnosis of monoplegia and hemiplegia and outline the approach needed to pinpoint the exact 2. Compressive lesion (tumor, large disc, etc) in underlying cause. cervical cord region. 3. Chronic infection of the brain (parietal lobe) or APPROACH TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MONOPLEGIA spinal cord (cervical region), such as tuberculous.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Myofascial Release on Spasticity and Lower Extremity
    hysical M f P ed l o ic a in n r e u & o R J International Journal of Kumar and Vaidya, Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2014, 3:1 l e a h n a DOI: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000253 o b i t i l a ISSN: 2329-9096i t a n r t i e o t n n I Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research Article Open Access Effectiveness of Myofascial Release on Spasticity and Lower Extremity Function in Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial Chandan Kumar1* and Snehashri N Vaidya2 1Associate Professor, Smt Kashibai Navale College of Physiotherapy, Narhe, Pune, Maharashtra, India 2MGM’S School of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, India Abstract Purpose: To find out the effectiveness of Myofascial Release in combination with conventional physiotherapy on spasticity of calf, hamstring and adductors of hip and on lower extremity function in spastic diplegic subjects. Methodology: 30 spastic diplegic subjects of age group 2-8 years were taken by random sampling method from MGM College and other private clinics in Aurangabad. 15 subjects were assigned in each group. Group A: Myofascial release and conventional PT treatment. Group B: conventional PT treatment. Both the groups received training for 4 weeks. Baseline and Post treatment measures of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) and Gross Motor Function Test (GMFM-88) were evaluated. Results: Mean difference of MAS and R2 value of MTS in group A was more than group B, for calf, hamstring and adductors, whereas GMFM showed nearly equal improvement in both groups. Conclusion: Overall, it can be concluded from our study that the MFR along with conventional treatment reduces spasticity in calf, hamstring and adductors of hip in spastic diplegic subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelopathy—Paresis and Paralysis in Cats
    Myelopathy—Paresis and Paralysis in Cats (Disorder of the Spinal Cord Leading to Weakness and Paralysis in Cats) Basics OVERVIEW • “Myelopathy”—any disorder or disease affecting the spinal cord; a myelopathy can cause weakness or partial paralysis (known as “paresis”) or complete loss of voluntary movements (known as “paralysis”) • Paresis or paralysis may affect all four limbs (known as “tetraparesis” or “tetraplegia,” respectively), may affect only the rear legs (known as “paraparesis” or “paraplegia,” respectively), the front and rear leg on the same side (known as “hemiparesis” or “hemiplegia,” respectively) or only one limb (known as “monoparesis” or “monoplegia,” respectively) • Paresis and paralysis also can be caused by disorders of the nerves and/or muscles to the legs (known as “peripheral neuromuscular disorders”) • The spine is composed of multiple bones with disks (intervertebral disks) located in between adjacent bones (vertebrae); the disks act as shock absorbers and allow movement of the spine; the vertebrae are named according to their location—cervical vertebrae are located in the neck and are numbered as cervical vertebrae one through seven or C1–C7; thoracic vertebrae are located from the area of the shoulders to the end of the ribs and are numbered as thoracic vertebrae one through thirteen or T1–T13; lumbar vertebrae start at the end of the ribs and continue to the pelvis and are numbered as lumbar vertebrae one through seven or L1–L7; the remaining vertebrae are the sacral and coccygeal (tail) vertebrae • The brain
    [Show full text]
  • Absence of Neurobehavioral Disturbance in a Focal Lesion of the Left Paracentral Lobule
    Behavioural Neurology (1992), 5,189-191 ICASE REPORTI Absence of neurobehavioral disturbance in a focal lesion of the left paracentral lobule T. Imamura and K. Tsuburaya Department of Neurology, Tohoku Kohseinenkin Hospital, Sendai, Japan Correspondence to: T. Imamura, Department of Neurology, Institute of Brain Diseases, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai 980, Japan The case of a right-handed woman with an infarcation confined to the left paracentral lobule and sparing the supplementary motor area (SMA) is reported. She presented with a right leg monoplegia and displayed no mutism. The absence of any associ­ ated neurobehavioral disturbances (mutism, forced grasping, reduced spontaneous arm activity or aphasia raises the possi­ bility that the left SMA has discrete neurobehavioral functions. Keywords: Medial frontal lobe - Precentral gyrus - Supplementary motor area - Transcortical motor aphasia INTRODUCTION Various kinds of neurobehavioral disturbances associated medial part of the left precentral gyrus, which is adjacent with left medial frontal lesions involving the supplemen­ to the SMA, to evaluate its possible neurobehavioral tary motor area (SMA) have been reported. Aphasia due to functions. damage of the left medial frontal lobe is characterized by an initial period of mutism followed by a stage of CASE REPORT decreased verbal output and spontaneous initiation with normal articulation (Stuss and Benson, 1986). Forced A 73-year-old right-handed woman with a history of grasping, compulsive manipulation of tools and decreased hypertension and diabetes mellitus suddenly developed a spontaneous limb movements have also been described gait disturbance. On examination, 24 h later, she was alert (Wise, 1984; Feinberg et al., 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebral Palsy
    Cerebral Palsy Cerebral palsy encompasses a group of non-progressive and non-contagious motor conditions that cause physical disability in various facets of body movement. Cerebral palsy is one of the most common crippling conditions of childhood, dating to events and brain injury before, during or soon after birth. Cerebral palsy is a debilitating condition in which the developing brain is irreversibly damaged, resulting in loss of motor function and sometimes also cognitive function. Despite the large increase in medical intervention during pregnancy and childbirth, the incidence of cerebral palsy has remained relatively stable for the last 60 years. In Australia, a baby is born with cerebral palsy about every 15 hours, equivalent to 1 in 400 births. Presently, there is no cure for cerebral palsy. Classification Cerebral palsy is divided into four major classifications to describe different movement impairments. Movements can be uncontrolled or unpredictable, muscles can be stiff or tight and in some cases people have shaky movements or tremors. These classifications also reflect the areas of the brain that are damaged. The four major classifications are: spastic, ataxic, athetoid/dyskinetic and mixed. In most cases of cerebral palsy, the exact cause is unknown. Suggested possible causes include developmental abnormalities of the brain, brain injury to the fetus caused by low oxygen levels (asphyxia) or poor circulation, preterm birth, infection, and trauma. Spastic cerebral palsy leads to increased muscle tone and inability for muscles to relax (hypertonic). The brain injury usually stems from upper motor neuron in the brain. Spastic cerebral palsy is classified depending on the region of the body affected; these include: spastic hemiplegia; one side being affected, spastic monoplegia; a single limb being affected, spastic triplegia; three limbs being affected, spastic quadriplegia; all four limbs more or less equally affected.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD9 & ICD10 Neuromuscular Codes
    ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM NEUROMUSCULAR DIAGNOSIS CODES ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM Focal Neuropathy Mononeuropathy G56.00 Carpal tunnel syndrome, unspecified Carpal tunnel syndrome 354.00 G56.00 upper limb Other lesions of median nerve, Other median nerve lesion 354.10 G56.10 unspecified upper limb Lesion of ulnar nerve, unspecified Lesion of ulnar nerve 354.20 G56.20 upper limb Lesion of radial nerve, unspecified Lesion of radial nerve 354.30 G56.30 upper limb Lesion of sciatic nerve, unspecified Sciatic nerve lesion (Piriformis syndrome) 355.00 G57.00 lower limb Meralgia paresthetica, unspecified Meralgia paresthetica 355.10 G57.10 lower limb Lesion of lateral popiteal nerve, Peroneal nerve (lesion of lateral popiteal nerve) 355.30 G57.30 unspecified lower limb Tarsal tunnel syndrome, unspecified Tarsal tunnel syndrome 355.50 G57.50 lower limb Plexus Brachial plexus lesion 353.00 Brachial plexus disorders G54.0 Brachial neuralgia (or radiculitis NOS) 723.40 Radiculopathy, cervical region M54.12 Radiculopathy, cervicothoracic region M54.13 Thoracic outlet syndrome (Thoracic root Thoracic root disorders, not elsewhere 353.00 G54.3 lesions, not elsewhere classified) classified Lumbosacral plexus lesion 353.10 Lumbosacral plexus disorders G54.1 Neuralgic amyotrophy 353.50 Neuralgic amyotrophy G54.5 Root Cervical radiculopathy (Intervertebral disc Cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, 722.71 M50.00 disorder with myelopathy, cervical region) unspecified cervical region Lumbosacral root lesions (Degeneration of Other intervertebral disc degeneration,
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Extremity Function in Persons with Tetraplegia: Relationships
    Neurorehabilitation and Research Articles Neural Repair Volume 23 Number 5 June 2009 413-421 © 2009 The Author(s) 10.1177/1545968308331143 Upper Extremity Function in Persons with http://nnr.sagepub.com Tetraplegia: Relationships Between Strength, Capacity, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Claudia Rudhe, OT, MSc, and Hubertus J. A. van Hedel, PT, PhD Objective. To quantify the relationship between the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III), arm and hand muscle strength, and hand function tests in persons with tetraplegia. Methods. A total of 29 individuals with tetraplegia (motor level between cervical 4 and thoracic 1; sensory-motor complete and incomplete) participated. The total score, category scores, and separate items of the SCIM III were compared to the upper extremity motor score (UEMS), an extended manual muscle test (MMT) for 11 upper extremity muscles, and 6 functional capacity tests of the hand. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (rs) and regression analyses were performed. Results. The SCIM III sum score correlated well with the sum scores of the 3 tests (rs ≥ .76). The SCIM III self-care category correlated better with the tests (rs ≥ .80) compared to the other categories (rs ≤ .72). The SCIM III self-care item “grooming” highly correlated with muscle strength and hand capacity items (rs ≥ .80). A combination of hand muscle tests and the key grasping task explained over 90% of the variability in the self-care category scores. Conclusions. The SCIM III self-care category reflects upper extremity performance as it contains especially useful and valid items that relate to upper extremity function and capacity tests.
    [Show full text]
  • SPASTIC CEREBRAL PALSY Management Options at Cincinnati
    SPASTIC CEREBRAL PALSY Management options at Cincinnati Children’s Charles B. Stevenson MD, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery To refer: fax completed referral form to 513-803-1111 parent calls to schedule 513-636-4726 Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Surgery Cincinnati Children’s is one of only a few pediatric medical centers to specialize in limited-access selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) surgery. This procedure is used to significantly reduce lower extremity spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. In most patients, particularly those with spastic diplegia, rhizotomy surgery permanently reduces spasticity and substantially improves motor function (such as sitting, standing, and walking). The procedure does not correct pre-existing muscle contractures or bone deformities; however, it can effectively prevent formation of orthopaedic deformities, thereby potentially reducing the need for muscle/tendon releases or hip reconstructive surgery. SDR does not correct baseline weakness, poor motor control, athetosis, or other motor problems sometimes associated with cerebral palsy. The limited-access approach has advantages over traditional posterior rhizotomy in that only a small window of bone is created to perform the procedure, whereas traditional rhizotomy involves extensive laminectomies from L2-S1, resulting in a higher rate of postoperative spinal deformities such as kyphosis and scoliosis. In addition, the incision is much smaller, typically 1-1.5 inches, resulting in less postoperative pain/discomfort, less need for narcotic pain medications,
    [Show full text]