DOCSLIB.ORG

The Critical Commitment of Philosophy. on Marcuse's Critical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Critical Commitment of Philosophy. on Marcuse's Critical García Echeverri, Mauricio. The critical commitment of philosophy. On Marcuse´s critical project Vol. IV, No. 4, enero-junio 2017 The critical commitment of philosophy. On Marcuse´s critical project de Marcuse “Recibido el 26 de abril, aceptado el 10 de mayo de 2017.” Mauricio García Echeverri* Abstract The present essay is not intended to be something new about Herbert Marcuse. As a personal exercise to clarify concepts, its aim is to provide an over- view of Marcuse’s conception, based especially from his book One-Dimensional Man, about an advanced industrial society and how our thinking is being more and more rooted in what social elites want us to believe. At the same time, the article provides a basis to think this problem in an increasing posmodern society that is forgetting the most important critical authors of 20th century and its main preoccupation: the identity between subject and society. Keywords: Marcuse, critical theory, technological rationality, repres- sion, negative thinking. * Graduated from Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Antioquia. 123 Vol. IV, No. 4 Revista Ciencias y Humanidades Enero-junio 2017 Resumen El presente ensayo no tiene ninguna intención de ser algo novedoso so- EUH+HUEHUW0DUFXVH&RPRHMHUFLFLRSHUVRQDOGHFODUL¿FDUFLHUWRVFRQFHSWRVVX propósito es dar un panorama sobre la concepción de Marcuse, basada especial- mente en su libro El hombre unidimensional, acerca de una sociedad industrial avanzada y cómo nuestro pensamiento está cada vez más enraizado en lo que las élites quieren que creamos. Al mismo tiempo, el artículo da bases para pensar este problema en una creciente sociedad posmoderna que está olvidando los au- tores críticos más importantes del siglo XX y una de sus máximas preocupacio- nes: ¿cuál es la identidad entre sujeto y sociedad? Palabras clave: Marcuse, teoría crítica, racionalidad tecnológica, repre- sión, pensamiento negativo. Introduction time and freetime, on the material and intellectual culture”1 For Marcuse, individual li- This is why for Marcuse liber- berty is reached when the productive ty has to be reconceptualized. It can apparatus is organized and centralized not be established in the same way not by the social forces of the advan- as it was posed, for example, in 18th ced industrial societies, but by a sta- century with french enlightenment. te that considers that autonomy is the Although it was a political view of base of a life that has to be guided by human freedom, the circumstances the own thinking of the subject. This and the power of technology over the will suppose the end of technological individual are too far different from rationality, that is to say, the end of the 18th century. As a hegelian, Marcu- se´s view about freedom is negative. establishment of living standards and The negative terms that allow acting judgment that make people act with as a counter part of politics and eco- an entire sumission to the social appa- nomy is the path to liberation, which UDWXV DQ DSSDUDWXV WKDW ³LPSRVHV LWV implies that positivity has to be rejec- economic and political requirements ted. However, this is one of the main for defense and expansion on labor problems of modern societies. Here 1 Marcuse, Herbert. One dimensional man. Stud- ies in the ideology of advanced insutrial society. New York: Routledge. 2002, p.5 124 García Echeverri, Mauricio. The critical commitment of philosophy. On Marcuse´s critical project Vol. IV, No. 4, enero-junio 2017 the question is posed: How can the circumstances that this concept has to subject, as an alienated person, reject EHXQGHUVWRRGLW¶VKLVWRU\DQGKXPDQ positivity? interaction the ones that create repres- Before arriving to the argu- sion, and not always our human natu- ment of Marcuse about how positive re. In an agressive society, repression WKLQNLQJFDQEHUHMHFWHGZHPXVW¿UVW refers to the fact that social inpositions of all, try to understand the ways in upon our lives makes us believe that which that positivity is rooted in our the relationship with the environment thinking. For the german author, the is true. This was possible in previous implanting of material and intellectual stages of society, for example that one needs is the way in which we are in- stablished by german romanticism, in creasingly controlled, we think about which social impositions were not so ourselves as free subjects that can go VWURQJ WKLV LV ZK\ WKH VXEMHFW FRXOG to the market and establish what we see with suspicion the political appa- want to do. However, one aspect of ratus and stayed against it. advanced industrial societies is that Marcuse is against those who of a high degree of repression. It’s think that the concept of ideology hi- the kind of repression that makes us des a conspiration or an illusion of see that we are happy, that we belie- the world. If this is true, that would ve that our thoughts are an individual remind us the rationality of industrial construction of our reason and desires, VRFLHWLHVEXWIRU0DUFXVHVRFLDOLP- but hides the imposition of social inte- positions are so strong, that the way of rests. False needs, being these the so OLYLQJLVQRWDQLOOXVLRQLVVRPHWKLQJ called gadgets, ideas about art and cul- that we believe in, that we think is ture, conceptions and transformations true. The reminding of the irrational of our bodies, in general everything rationality of technological progress that is stated as the material and inte- is true. llectual excedent of capital, is the new Technological progress, the way of repression. new way of control, shows the con- Since Freud´s psychoanalysis, tradiciton of this society. But this repression is seen as an indispensable contradiction is assumed by human way of acting to the maintenance of beings as a non contradiciton. They culture. To appease one part of our dual think that social antagonisms are over nature, Eros and Thanatos, is essential and that there is no need to struggle to a harmonious life between men. No- against misery, injustice, poverty, bad WZLWKVWDQGLQJ0DUFXVHVDI¿QLW\ZLWK education, and so on. Things are like Freud´s ideas, he saw another level of this because we believe that the sys- repression. Is in order to ideological tem is abolishing them. Now, we are 125 Vol. IV, No. 4 Revista Ciencias y Humanidades Enero-junio 2017 confronted with a social apparatus that sociologist Charles Wright Mills3, the puts us in a stage in which we think state, the corporations and the army about ourselves according to our pos- were the modern institutions that ru- sessions, “the term introjection per- led other institutions, such as the fa- haps no longer describes the way in mily, universities, church, and so on. which the individual by himself re- The political universe is also an ideo- produces and perpertuates the external logical stage in which we believe we controls exercised by his society. In- DUHIUHHWRHOHFWRXUVHUYDQWVEXWWKH\ trojection suggests a variety of relati- were already elected by an economic vely spontaneous processes by which power in which we do not have any a Self (Ego) transposes the outer into chance to participate. the inner”2. When this introjection, or A welfare and warfare state mimesis, is our life style, we no longer was one of the consequences of the accept other life styles. We no longer ¿UVWSDUWRIWKFHQWXU\ZDUV,QWKH accept qualitatively changes, but we Frankfurt School, the state is seen see our lives according to cuantitative from the analysis of Friedrich Pollock, conditions, such as possesions or the especially during the period of post attempt to size experiences and fee- World War II, with his essay about lings like love and hate. state capitalism. Either in his condi- tion of democratic or totalitarian, the The closing of the political universe basic about state capitalism is that the market is deposed of his controller One question raises at the mo- function, in order to be a function of ment of posing the structure of alie- the state, through a general plan that nated individual thinking: What is the manages the actions of consumers. Its social structure in which those people REMHFWLYHLVWRLQFUHDVHWKHEHQH¿WVRI exist? Related to the political stage, WKRVHZKRKDYHLQÀXHQFHLQWKHJHQH- the new society is for Marcuse the ral plan. “No state capitalistic gover- union between Welfare and Warfare nment can or will dispense with the state. In the new way of doing politics, SUR¿W PRWLYH IRU WZR UHDVRQV )LUVW economic power is held by private HOLPLQDWLRQRIWKHSUR¿WPRWLYHZRXOG corporations, with an executive power destroy the character of the entire sys- more and more controlled by an elite, tem, and second, in many respects the although not directly, but with its eco- SUR¿W PRWLYH UHPDLQV DV DQ HI¿FLHQW nomic force able to buy the political class. As it was stated by the american 3 Mills, C.W. The power elite. United States: Ox- 2 Ibíd., p.12 ford University Press, 2000. 126 García Echeverri, Mauricio. The critical commitment of philosophy. On Marcuse´s critical project Vol. IV, No. 4, enero-junio 2017 incentive”4. No matter if the state has Marcuse resort to the marxian analysis a stronger power in the economic or- that contemplates the production appa- der of society, or that the welfare state ratus as the one that creates the techni- UHSUHVHQWHGEHQH¿WVIRUHYHU\RQHWKH cal rationality. This technical rationali- VWDWHZDVQRWDXWRQRPRXVPRUHWKDQ ty is shown not only in factories, tools that, the aforementioned elite hoarded and the exploitation of resources, but the political sphere. Moreover, as it also in labor time. In order to achie- was established recently by the french ve human freedom, socialist society economist Thomas Piketty5, between proposes that those immediate pro- 1970 and 1980, there was a growth ducers should manage the productive deceleration, specially demographic, a apparatus. It is not the nationalization movement in privatization and trans- or the socialization the way to break ference of public wealth to private the technological structure, the end of wealth, and the recovery of real es- the existing social structure implies an tate and stock exchanges actives, has alienation of the laboring classes from led to an advent of certain social elites the universe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Erich Fromm's Social-Psychological
    RUDOLF SIEBERT 8. ERICH FROMM’S SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF RELIGION Toward the X-Experience and the City of Being INTRODUCTION1 This essay explores Erich Fromm’s social-psychological theory of religion, as X- experience and longing for the City of Being, as being informed by the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament, Meister Eckhart as well as Georg W.F Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud. Its religious attitude constituted the very dynamic of Fromm’s writings, as well as of those of the other critical theorists of society, e.g. Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Leo Loewenthal, Herbert Marcuse, etc., It united them. It could only be expressed in poetical symbols: the X-experience; or the longing for the imageless, nameless, notionless utterly Other than the horror and terror of nature and history; or the yearning for perfect justice and unconditional love: that the murderer may not triumph over the innocent victim, at least not ultimately. Man begins to become man only with the awakening of this longing for the entirely Other, or the X-experience. This religious attitude aims as idology at the destruction of all idolatry. In the Near East –––––––––––––– 1 Editors’ note-The author’s use of Fromm’s concept of “x-experience” comes from this passage in his work: What we call the religious attitude is an x that is expressible only in poetic and visual symbols. This x experience has been articulated in various concepts which have varied in accordance with the social organization of a particular cultural period. In the Near East, x was expressed in the concept of a supreme tribal chief, or king, and thus „God” became the supreme concept of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, which were rooted in the social structures of that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Erich Fromm, "The Method and Function of Analytic Social
    THE ESSENTIAL FRANKFURT SCHOOL READER Edited by Andrew Arato & Eike Gebhardt Introduction by Paul Piccone continuum NEW YORK.."LONDON I Contents 2005 The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc 15 East 26 Street, New York, NY 10010 The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd The Tower Building, 11 York Road, London SEI 7NX Preface vii Copyright © 1982 by The Continuum Publishing Company General Introduction Paul Piccone ix All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means; electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, Part I Political Sociology and or otherwise, without the written permission of Critique of Politics The Continuum Publishing Company. Printed in the United States of America Introducticn by Andrew Arato 3 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The End of Reason Max Horkheimer 26 Main entry under title: Changes in the Structure of The Essential Frankfurt school reader. Political Compromise Otto Kirchheimer 49 Originally published. New York: Urizen Books, State Capitalism: Its Possibilities cl978. Bibliography: p. and Limitations Friedrich Pollock 71 Includes index. The Authoritarian State Max Horkheimer 95 1. Mass society-Addresses, essays, lectures. Freudian Theory and the Pattern 2. Political science-Addresses, essays, lectures. 3. Economics-Addresses, 'essays, lectures. 'of Fascist Propaganda TheDdor W. Adorno 118 4. Social sciences-Methodology-Addresses, essays, Some Social Implications of lectures. I. Arata, Andrew. II. Gebhardt, Eike, Herbert Marcuse 138 III. Title: Frankfurt school reader. Modem Technology HMlOl.E745 1982 300 82-8063 Notes 163 ISBN 0-8264-0194-5 AACR2 476 A Critique of Methodology recognizes the.historical subject in its sinngebendeLeistung;but then, by suspending, bracketing it, the phenomenological analysis creates its own a priori, its own ideation, and its own ideological veil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Controversy Over Friedrich Pollock's State Capitalism
    Article History of the Human Sciences 2016, Vol. 29(2) 23–41 The controversy over ª The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Friedrich Pollock’s state DOI: 10.1177/0952695116637296 capitalism hhs.sagepub.com Manfred Gangl University of Applied Studies, Germany Abstract The critique of capitalism is the bedrock on which rests the reputation of Frankfurt School critical theory. Though critical theory has often been heralded – or criticized and rejected – as a reformulation of Marxian theory for our times, its relation with the critique of political economy, and in particular the economic treatises, has barely been studied. Friedrich Pollock, who was Max Horkheimer’s lifelong friend and close associate at the Institute for Social Research, was responsible for all administrative and financial questions, but he wrote few theoretical essays and Wiggershaus calls him ‘the last unknown member of the Frankfurt School’. Nevertheless this article asks whether not only has his influence on early critical theory been sorely underestimated, but also his impact on the late philosophies of Horkheimer, Adorno and Marcuse. Keywords critical theory, critique of political economy, dialectic of enlightenment, Friedrich Pollock, state capitalism The reputation of Frankfurt School critical theory rests upon its critique of capitalism. It has often been heralded – or criticized and rejected – as a reformulation of Marxian theory for our times. Yet the relation between critical theory and the critique of political economy has barely been studied, least of all its economic treatises. Friedrich Pollock, Max Horkheimer’s lifelong friend and close associate at the Insti- tute for Social Research,1 where he was responsible for all administrative and financial Corresponding author: Manfred Gangl, Hochschule Fulda – University of Applied Studies, Leipziger Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Critical Theory of Society Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse Edited by Douglas Kellner
    TOWARDS A CRITICAL THEORY OF SOCIETY COLLECTED PAPERS OF HERBERT MARCUSE EDITED BY DOUGLAS KELLNER Volume One TECHNOLOGY, WAR AND FASCISM Volume Two TOWARDS A CRITICAL THEORY OF SOCIETY Volume Three FOUNDATIONS OF THE NEW LEFT Volume Four ART AND LIBERATION Volume Five PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOANALYSIS AND EMANCIPATION Volume Six MARXISM, REVOLUTION AND UTOPIA TOWARDS A CRITICAL THEORY OF SOCIETY HERBERT MARCUSE COLLECTED PAPERS OF HERBERT MARCUSE Volume Two Edited by Douglas Kellner London and New York First published 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 2001 Peter Marcuse Selection and Editorial Matter © 2001 Douglas Kellner Afterword © Jürgen Habermas All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Marcuse, Herbert, 1898– Towards a critical theory of society / Herbert Marcuse; edited by Douglas Kellner. p. cm. – (Collected papers of Herbert Marcuse; v. 2) Includes bibliographical
    [Show full text]
  • The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism | by Samuel Freeman | the New
    The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism | by Samuel Freeman | The New... http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/03/23/frankfurt-school-head... Font Size: A A A The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism Samuel Freeman MARCH 23, 2017 ISSUE Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School by Stuart Jeffries Verso, 440 pp., $26.95 Habermas: A Biography by Stefan Müller-Doohm, translated from the German by Daniel Steuer Polity, 598 pp., $39.95 Adorno and Existence by Peter E. Gordon Harvard University Press, 256 pp., $29.95 Marx argued that economic systems have always involved the exploitation of workers for the benefit of a privileged class that owns and controls “the means of production.” As a result, according to Marx, workers are “alienated” from their labor, from the products they make, from other people, and ultimately from their own humanity since their lives and labor are determined not by themselves but by the demands of a privileged class and impersonal market forces. Jeremy J. Shapiro Workers tolerate this apparent injustice, Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno (in foreground) with Jürgen Marx explains, because exploitation is Habermas (far right), Heidelberg, April 1964 hidden from everyone’s view by a complex web of illusions he calls “ideology.” Significant obfuscations under capitalism include a wage contract that allegedly gives workers the fair value of their labor, as well as “ideological nonsense about right” such as “free and fair exchange,” “fair distribution,” and the claim that capitalists make a contribution on a par with labor. These and other illusions, along with 1 of 11 3/5/17, 7:52 PM The Headquarters of Neo-Marxism | by Samuel Freeman | The New..
    [Show full text]
  • An Intervention in Contemporary Critical Thought and Practice
    Counter-Critical Theory: An Intervention in Contemporary Critical Thought and Practice Bernard E. Harcourt Columbia University A new journal is at issue, and indeed the only one to have overcome my firmly rooted conviction that I could never again get involved in anything like it […] I cleared the way for the plan’s acceptance by the publisher Rowohlt by appointing myself the representative responsible for the journal’s organizational and practical aspects, which I have worked out in long conversations with [Bertolt] Brecht. Its formal stance will be scholarly, even academic, rather than journalistic, and it will be called Krise und Kritik. — Walter Benjamin, letter to Gershom Scholem, October 1930.1 Crisis and Critique. Kritische Blätter, then. Critical Times, now. And how appropriate that is. We indeed live in critical times—at a troubling conjuncture of world-historical developments that are challenging our understanding of both our past and our possible futures. Around the world, we are witnessing a grab for the global commons—or whatever was left of it—with the dismantling of the Soviet Union and the precipitous privatization of industry, utilities, and finance in the former Eastern Bloc, the capitalization of the Chinese economy, the deregulation of the British and American economies, gradually seeping across Western Europe, the devastating impact of the IMF’s fiscal policies across Africa and Latin America. Mainstream economists document the plummeting percentage of property held in public trust in China, Japan, Europe, and the
    [Show full text]
  • Theodor W. Adorno's “Theses on Need”
    Translator’s Note: WHAT follows is a translation of “Thesen über Bedürfnis,” which is found in Adorno’s collected writings.1 This text was presented in the context of an informal summer seminar held from Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2017 June through August of 1942, involving Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse, Ludwig Marcuse, Friedrich Pollock, Günther Anders, Bertolt Brecht, Hans Eisler, and others. The discussions revolved around two central themes: (i) Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, which presents the worrying portrait of ‘frenzied material progress minus emancipation’2; and (ii) the notion, suggested earlier in 1942 by Henry A. Wallace, that technological advancements could guarantee a ration of milk (and indeed food) to everyone in the Theodor W. Adorno’s world.3 “Theses on Need” The materials from the seminar, apart from Adorno’s and H. Marcuse’s contributions, are gathered in Max Horkheimer, A Translation of Theodor W. Adorno’s Gesammelte Schriften, 19 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1985–1996), 12:252-256, 12:559-586, and 19:22-27. While Adorno “Thesen über Bedürfnis” never published the “Theses,” he did incorporate some passages into “Aldous Huxley and Utopia,” which appeared in Prisms.4 However, the reference to “classless society” was—characteristically— Martin Shuster Goucher College [email protected] 1 Theodor W. Adorno, Gesammelte Schriften, 20 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1984), 8:392-96. This translation is published by permission of Suhrkamp Verlag. Iain Macdonald 2 Richard Wolin, “Introduction to the Discussion of [Ludwig Marcuse’s] ‘Need and Université de Montréal Culture in Nietzsche,’” Constellations, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Political Theory As an Anti-Enlightenment Project
    Dennis C. Rasmussen Brown University Contemporary Political Theory as an Anti-Enlightenment Project [NB: I am aware that the argument of this paper – that the majority of contemporary political theorists seek to dissociate themselves from the Enlightenment – isn’t actually much of an argument. I am currently beginning a book project that will seek to defend the Enlightenment (to some extent or another) from the attacks of its contemporary critics; the material gathered here includes part of the introduction and the introductions to each of the five substantive chapters, along with a few underdeveloped remarks at the beginning and end that seek to tie things together. In other words, this material wasn’t written as a stand-alone paper, so I apologize if it seems incomplete – it is! I also apologize for the length; for those who don’t have the time or desire to read it all, the main line of argument comes in the first 18 pages, with the rest fleshing out some details. I will, however, be eager to hear your thoughts about the charges I have outlined, and especially if I have missed any major critics or criticisms of the Enlightenment.] Like it or not, we are all children of the Enlightenment, utterly incapable of escaping the clutches of ideals and arguments put forth over two centuries ago. Or so, at least, many critics of the Enlightenment seem to believe. Michel Foucault claims, for instance, that the Enlightenment has largely determined “what we are, what we think, and what we do today,”1 and John Gray insists that “all schools of contemporary political thought are variations on the Enlightenment project.”2 There is, of course, something to such claims: given the number of values, practices, and institutions that we have inherited from the eighteenth century, it is difficult to imagine what our world would look like without its Enlightenment heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Von Der Gesellschaftssteuerung Zur Sozialen Kontrolle.Pdf 704 the Conference Was Max Weber Und Die Soziologie Heute: Verhandlungen Des 15
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9p0574bc Author Callison, William Andrew Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory By William Andrew Callison A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy Brown, Chair Professor Pheng Cheah Professor Kinch Hoekstra Professor Martin Jay Professor Hans Sluga Professor Shannon C. Stimson Summer 2019 Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory Copyright © 2019 William Andrew Callison All rights reserved. Abstract Political Deficits: The Dawn of Neoliberal Rationality and the Eclipse of Critical Theory By William Andrew Callison Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy Brown, Chair This dissertation examines the changing relationship between social science, economic governance, and political imagination over the past century. It specifically focuses on neoliberal, ordoliberal and neo-Marxist visions of politics and rationality from the interwar period to the recent Eurocrisis. Beginning with the Methodenstreit (or “methodological dispute”) between Gustav von Schmoller and Carl Menger and the subsequent “socialist calculation debate” about markets and planning, the dissertation charts the political and epistemological formation of the Austrian School (e.g., Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich A.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Theory and the Historical Transformations of Capitalist Modernity
    CHAPTER 7 Critical Theory and the Historical Transformations of Capitalist Modernity Moishe Postone Critical Theory, the ensemble of approaches frst developed during the inter- war years by theorists of the Frankfurt School—members of the Institut für Sozialforschung and those close to its publication, the Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung—is one of the richest and most powerful attempts to formu- late a critical social, cultural, and historical theory adequate to the contempo- rary world. It sought to illuminate the great historical changes of the frst six decades of the twentieth century with reference to a large-scale transformation of capitalism, and did so in ways that attempted to critically interrelate the political, social, philosophical, economic, cultural, legal, aesthetic, and psy- chological dimensions of capitalist modernity. Moreover, rejecting the notion that a theoretical standpoint could be independent of its social and historical context, Critical Theory sought self-refexively to ground its own critique as a historical possibility. Its critique of capitalist modernity and of its dominant form of rationality was undertaken from the standpoint of critical reason itself. The question of the self-refexivity of the theory and that of the standpoint of critique were intrinsically tied. In the late 1930s and early 1940s, however, Critical Theory’s attempt to grapple critically with contemporary historical transformations took a deeply pessimistic theoretical turn, culminating in Dialectic of Enlightenment (Horkheimer and Adorno 2002), according to which the epochal transforma- tion of capitalism in the twentieth century had given rise to a society that, while remaining antagonistic, had become completely administered and one- M. Postone (*) University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA © The Author(s) 2017 137 M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frankfurt School Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Freely Available at The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://www.iep.utm.edu/frankfur/ Claudio Corradetti The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory The Frankfurt School, also known as the Institute of Social Research ( Institut für Sozialforschung ), is a social and political philosophical movement of thought located in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. It is the original source of what is known as Critical Theory . The Institute was founded, thanks to a donation by Felix Weil in 1923, with the aim of developing Marxist studies in Germany. The Institute eventually generated a specific school of thought after 1933 when the Nazis forced it to close and move to the United States, where it found hospitality at Columbia University, New York. The academic influence of the “critical” method is far reaching in terms of educational institutions in which such tradition is taught and in terms of the problems it addresses. Some of its core issues involve the critique of modernities and of capitalist society, the definition of social emancipation and the perceived pathologies of society. Critical theory provides a specific interpretation of Marxist philosophy and reinterprets some of its central economic and political notions such as commodification, reification, fetishization and critique of mass culture. Some of the most prominent figures of the first generation of Critical Theorists are Max Horkheimer (1895-1973), Theodor Adorno (1903-1969), Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979), Walter Benjamin (1892-1940), Friedrich Pollock (1894-1970), Leo Lowenthal (1900-1993), Eric Fromm (1900-1980). Since the 1970s, the second generation has been led by Jürgen Habermas who has greatly contributed to fostering the dialogue between the so called “continental” and “analytical” tradition.
    [Show full text]