DOCSLIB.ORG

Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Project Ref: J/7/19/18 Originator: Redacted Date: 01/02/2019 Circulation: Restricted: Commercial-in-confidence Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Prepared by: MarineSpace Ltd MarineSpace Ltd Ocean Village Innovation Centre Ocean Way, Southampton SO14 3JZ Prepared for: NKT HV Cables AB, SE 37123 Karlskrona Sweden ii Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Date Originator Version Action Signature Redacted 18/05/2018 I Reach 0.1 Internal Draft Redacted 21/05/2018 I Reach 0.2 Internal Draft Director Sign-off / Redacted 21/05/2018 J Lewis 1.0 External Document Redacted 21/12/2018 J Lewis 1.1 Internal Draft Redacted 23/01/2019 I Reach 1.2 Internal Draft Technical Review / Redacted 23/01/2019 J Lewis 1.3 Editorial Review Redacted 28/01/2019 B Forrow 1.4 Editorial Review Internal Draft - Redacted 31/01/2019 I Reach 1.5 Addressing Client / Regulator Comments Internal Draft - Redacted 01/02/2019 I Reach 1.6 Addressing Client / Regulator Comments Redacted Technical Review / 01/02/2019 J Lewis 1.7 Editorial Review Redacted Director Sign-off / 01/02/2019 J Lewis 2.0 External Document © Crown Copyright, 2019. All rights reserved. Licence No. EK001-0760-MF0210. NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. The cover image of horse mussel Modiolus modiolus beds © NKT 2017 ©. All rights reserved. iii Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1. Status of the C-M Project ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2. Context of Marine Protected Areas Assessment ................................................................. 1-3 1.3. Scope of the Marine Protected Areas Assessment .............................................................. 1-9 2. Relevant Environmental Legislation – Habitats Regulations Assessment ................................... 2-1 2.1. The EC Habitats Directive and UK Regulations .................................................................... 2-1 2.2. Overview of the Habitats Regulations Assessment Process ................................................ 2-1 2.2.1. The Role and Requirements of the Competent Authority ____________________________ 2-3 2.3. Domestic Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas .................................................... 2-3 3. Activities to be Assessed and Associated Pressures (Effects) ...................................................... 3-1 3.1. Sources of Evidence Reviewed to Inform Assessment ........................................................ 3-1 3.2. Pressures Associated with Proposed CFE and / or Rock Placement Works and CPS and Emplacement and Presence of Rock Berm ...................................................................................... 3-3 4. Screening of Marine Protected Areas .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1. Screening Rationale ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2. Exposure Pathways and Connectivity .................................................................................. 4-4 4.3. Sites Designated for Habitat Features ................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.1. Screening of Designated Habitat Features ________________________________________ 4-5 4.4. Sites Classified or Designated for Ornithological Features .................................................. 4-8 4.4.1. Foraging Ranges _____________________________________________________________ 4-8 4.4.2. Period of Works and Seasonality of Classified Populations ___________________________ 4-9 4.4.3. Screening of Classified and Designated Populations of Birds __________________________ 4-9 4.4.4. Over-wintering Diver, Grebe, Merganser and Seaduck Species _______________________ 4-10 4.4.5. Classified Breeding Populations ________________________________________________ 4-11 4.4.6. Designated Habitat Within a Special Protection Area or Ramsar Site __________________ 4-16 4.5. Sites Designated for Annex II Marine Mammal Features .................................................. 4-18 4.5.1. Annex II Marine Mammal Features – Foraging Ranges _____________________________ 4-19 4.5.2. Screening of Annex II Marine Mammal Features – Foraging Ranges ___________________ 4-20 iv Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment 4.5.3. Screening of Annex II Marine Mammal Features – Underwater Sound Emissions ________ 4-21 4.5.4. Screening of Annex II Marine Mammal Features – Damage and Disturbance ___________ 4-21 4.6. Sites Designated for Annex II Migratory Fish Features ...................................................... 4-22 4.6.1. Annex II Migratory Fish Features - Damage and Disturbance ________________________ 4-23 5. Assessment of Adverse Effects on Integrity of Sites .................................................................... 5-1 5.1. Designated Habitat Features ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1. Removal or Abrasion from CFE and / or Placement of Rock __________________________ 5-1 5.1.2. Increased Turbidity and Smothering from Deposition of Advected Sediments and Plumes from Controlled Flow Excavation and / or Placement of Rock ______________________________________ 5-1 5.1.3. Determination of Impacts from Increased Turbidity and Smothering from Deposition of Advected Sediments and Plumes from Controlled Flow Excavation and / or Placement of Rock ______ 5-3 5.2. Ornithological Qualifying Features ...................................................................................... 5-4 5.2.1. Increased Turbidity from CFE and / or Placement of Rock ____________________________ 5-4 5.2.2. Determination of Impacts of Increased Turbidity and Deposition ______________________ 5-5 5.2.3. Prey Species Habitat Loss and Loss of Foraging Habitat ______________________________ 5-5 5.2.4. Determination of Impacts on Prey Species and Loss of Foraging Habitat ________________ 5-7 5.2.5. Underwater Sound Emissions on Prey Species _____________________________________ 5-8 5.2.6. Determination of Impacts from Underwater Sound Emissions on Prey Species ___________ 5-9 5.3. Annex II Marine Mammal Features ..................................................................................... 5-9 5.3.1. Prey Species Habitat Loss, Loss of Foraging Habitat Space and Impacts from Underwater Sound Emissions and Foraging Success _________________________________________________________ 5-9 5.3.2. Determination of Impacts on Prey Species Habitat Loss, Foraging Area and from Underwater Sound Emissions on Prey Species ________________________________________________________ 5-9 5.3.3. Impacts from Damage and Disturbance __________________________________________ 5-9 5.4. Annex II Migratory Fish Features ....................................................................................... 5-14 5.4.1. Damage and Disturbance _____________________________________________________ 5-14 6. In-combination Assessment ......................................................................................................... 6-1 7. Mitigation Measures Proposed for the use of USBL Systems and Beacons ................................ 7-1 7.1. Mitigation ............................................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1.1. Pre-Work Searches ___________________________________________________________ 7-1 7.1.2. Soft Starts __________________________________________________________________ 7-2 v Caithness – Moray HVDC Link - Controlled Flow Excavation / Rock Placement Marine Protected Areas Assessment 7.1.3. Transit Watches _____________________________________________________________ 7-2 8. References ................................................................................................................................... 8-3 9. Annex A ........................................................................................................................................ 9-1 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Location of proposed works in associated with Marine Protected Areas in the Assessment Area ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 4.1: The suite of European Marine Sites and Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas within the Assessment Area ................................................................................................................ 4-3 Figure 4.2: Area of proposed works at the northern part of the cable close to the Pentland Firth potential Special Protection Area and Noss Head Nature Conservation Marine Protected Area ....... 4-4 Figure 4.3: Area of proposed works at the southern part of the cable within the Moray Firth potential Special Protection Area
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Highland Council Election, Thursday 6 May 1999 - Results
    The Highland Council Election, Thursday 6 May 1999 - Results CANDIDATE DESCRIPTION VOTES MAJORITY %POLL 1. Caithness North West MacDonald, Alastair I Lib Dem 680 278 58.3% Mowat, John M* Ind 408 2. Thurso West Bruce, George - 357 Fry, James H Thurso Ind 407 47 61.5% Saxon, Eric R Scot Labour 454 3. Thurso Central Henderson, Ronald S Ind 198 Macdonald, Elizabeth - 482 71 58.9% C* Rosie, John S Scot Labour 553 4. Thurso East Waters, Donald M F* - Returned unopposed 5. Caithness Central Flear, David C M Scot Lib Dem Returned unopposed 6. Caithness North East Green, John H* - 793 213 69.7% Richard, David A Ind 580 7. Wick Mowat, Bill Scot Labour 402 Murray, Anderson* Ind 376 45 59.2% Smith, Graeme M Scot Lib Dem 447 8. Wick West Fernie, William N Ind 438 Roy, Alistair A Ind 333 25 59.1% Steven, Deirdre J. Scot Labour 463 9. Pultneytown Oag, James William* - 673 236 55.8% Smith, Niall - 437 10. Caithness South East Calder, Jeanette M Ind 522 173 62.9% Mowat, William A* Ind Liberal 695 SUTHERLAND (6) 11. Sutherland North West Keith, Francis R M* - Returned unopposed 12. Tongue and Farr Jardine, Eirene B M Scot Lib Dem 539 25 67.0% Mackay, Alexander* Ind 514 13. Sutherland Central Chalmers, Alexander - 186 255 69.8% Magee, Alison L* Ind 725 Taylor, Russell Eugene Ind 470 14. Golspie and Rogart Houston, Helen M Ind 373 Ross, William J Ind 687 314 70.2% Scott, Valerie E R - 150 15. Brora Finlayson, Margaret W - 802 140 68.1% McDonald, Ronald R* Ind 662 16.
    [Show full text]
  • BCS Paper 2016/13
    Boundary Commission for Scotland BCS Paper 2016/13 2018 Review of Westminster Constituencies Considerations for constituency design in Highland and north of Scotland Action required 1. The Commission is invited to consider the issue of constituency size when designing constituencies for Highland and the north of Scotland and whether it wishes to propose a constituency for its public consultation outwith the electorate quota. Background 2. The legislation governing the review states that no constituency is permitted to be larger than 13,000 square kilometres. 3. The legislation also states that any constituency larger than 12,000 square kilometres may have an electorate lower than 95% of the electoral quota (ie less than 71,031), if it is not reasonably possible for it to comply with that requirement. 4. The constituency size rule is probably only relevant in Highland. 5. The Secretariat has considered some alternative constituency designs for Highland and the north of Scotland for discussion. 6. There are currently 3 UK Parliament constituencies wholly with Highland Council area: Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross – 45,898 electors Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey – 74,354 electors Ross, Skye and Lochaber – 51,817 electors 7. During the 6th Review of UK Parliament constituencies the Commission developed proposals based on constituencies within the electoral quota and area limit. Option 1 – considers electorate lower than 95% of the electoral quota in Highland 8. Option 1: follows the Scottish Parliament constituency of Caithness, Sutherland and Ross, that includes Highland wards 1 – 5, 7, 8 and part of ward 6. The electorate and area for the proposed Caithness, Sutherland and Ross constituency is 53,264 electors and 12,792 sq km; creates an Inverness constituency that includes Highland wards 9 -11, 13-18, 20 and ward 6 (part) with an electorate of 85,276.
    [Show full text]
  • River Oykel Special Area of Conservation (Sac)
    RIVER OYKEL SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION (SAC) CONSERVATION ADVICE PACKAGE Image: © Lyn Wells, NatureScot Site Details Site name: River Oykel Site map: https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8363 Location: Highlands and Islands Site code: UK0030261 Area (ha): 921.46 Date designated: 17 March 2005 Qualifying features Qualifying feature SCM assessed condition SCM visit UK overall on this site date Conservation Status Freshwater pearl mussel Unfavourable - No change 8 April 2015 Unfavourable – (Margaritifera bad margaritifera) [S1029] Atlantic salmon (Salmo Favourable – Recovered 7 July 2011 Unfavourable- salar) [S1106] Inadequate Notes: Assessed condition refers to the condition of the SAC feature assessed at a site level as part of NatureScot’s Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) programme. Conservation status is the overall condition of the feature throughout its range within the UK as reported to the European Commission under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive in 2019. Overlapping and linked Protected Areas The River Oykel SAC includes main stem of the River Oykel, which rises within Ben More Assynt Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/191 The river flows through Loch Ailsh, which is part of Inverpolly, Loch Urigill and nearby Lochs Special Protection Area (SPA) https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8516 and Loch Awe and Loch Ailsh SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/1710. It also flows through Oykel Gorge SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/1264 Kyle of Sutherland Marshes SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/885 The River Oykel SAC also includes two principle tributaries of the River Oykel: the River Cassley which rises within a different part of Ben More Assynt SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/191 the River Einig which rises within Beinn Dearg SAC https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8198 and Beinn Dearg SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/165 The seaward end of the River Oykel SAC meets the Dornoch Firth and Morrich More SAC https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8242 at Bonar Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Guide Highland
    EEaassyy GGuuiiddee HHiigghhllaanndd IInntteeggrraatteedd CChhiillddrreenn’’ss SSeerrvviicceess 2 “Getting it right for every child - Highland’s Children” The Children’s Services Managers Group (SMG) is the lead body of Managers involved in the provision of services for children & young people. The SMG is tasked with ensuring strong integration and high quality of services for children and families in Highland. Encompassing Education, Social Work, NHS, Northern Constabulary and partner services and agencies, the SMG facilitates the development of services and professional networks around Associated School Groups and their communities. As part of our commitment to ensuring best use of resources and early intervention this guide has been developed to assist you. This Easy Guide has been updated at the request of local staff who found the previous edition a useful element of their resources library. We are keen to ensure staff know what resources are available. This information is ever changing. Consequently, the Easy Guide focuses on directing you to resource web sites, ensuring you see the most up to date information on a service or resource. When working with a child & family a Named Person or Lead Professional will find this updated Easy Guide a useful tool for tracking down resources to help in the development of a Childs Plan. Equally, it is hoped that it will be of use to all staff working with children and young people. The Easy Guide will be updated on a regular basis. If you become aware of any amendments, errors or additions please forward to Maggie Tytler. Please do not hesitate to let us know of ways in which this resource might be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Archaeological Finds Allocation Panel
    Scottish Archaeological Finds Allocation Panel Thursday 5 December 2019 Deadline for applications: Tuesday 12th November 2019 Number of cases – Cases with competing Applications - Cases with no applications – *accepting in place of no application Chance Finds TT No. Description Local Authority TT 89/19 Roman Coin, Stonehaven Aberdeenshire TT 90/19 Roman Brooch, Kildrummy Aberdeenshire TT 92/19 Medieval Assemblage, Aberdeenshire Fraserburgh TT 135/19 Two Bronze Age Axeheads, Aberdeenshire Glass TT 74/19 Bronze Age Axehead Angus Fragment, Ruthven TT 109/19 Medieval – Post-Medieval Angus Finger Ring, Aberlemno TT 132/19 Medieval-Post-Medieval Angus Assemblage, East Haven TT 147/19 Medieval Coin, Montrose Angus TT 94/19 Bronze Age Arrowhead, Argyll & Bute Carradale TT 102/19 Bronze Age Axehead, Isle of Argyll & Bute Islay TT 103/19 Roman Imperial Denarius, Dumfries & Kirkton Galloway TT 104/19 Iron Age Object, Lochans Dumfries & Galloway TT 126/19 Medieval Hand Bell, New Dumfries & Abbey Galloway TT 127/19 Bronze Age Knife Dumfries & Fragments, Leswalt Galloway TT 146/19 Iron Age/Roman Brooch, Falkirk Stenhousemuir TT 79/19 Medieval Mount, Newburgh Fife TT 81/19 Late Bronze Age Socketed Fife Gouge, Aberdour TT 99/19 Early Medieval Coin, Fife Lindores TT 100/19 Medieval Harness Pendant, Fife St Andrews TT 101/19 Late Medieval/Post-Medieval Fife Seal Matrix, St Andrews TT 111/19 Iron Age Button and Loop Fife Fastener, Kingsbarns TT 128/19 Bronze Age Spearhead Fife Fragment, Lindores TT 112/19 Medieval Harness Pendant, Highland Muir of Ord TT
    [Show full text]
  • North Highlands North Highlands
    Squam Lakes Natural Science Center’s North Highlands Wester Ross, Sutherland, Caithness and Easter Ross June 14-27, 2019 Led by Iain MacLeod 2019 Itinerary Join native Scot Iain MacLeod for a very personal, small-group tour of Scotland’s Northern Highlands. We will focus on the regions known as Wester Ross, Sutherland, Caithness and Easter Ross. The hotels are chosen by Iain for their comfort, ambiance, hospitality, and excellent food. Iain personally arranges every detail—flights, meals, transportation and daily destinations. Note: This is a brand new itinerary, so we will be exploring this area together. June 14: Fly from Logan Airport, Boston to Scotland. I hope that we will be able to fly directly into Inverness and begin our trip from there. Whether we fly through London, Glasgow or Dublin will be determined later in 2018. June 15: Arrive in Inverness. We will load up the van and head west towards the spectacular west coast passing by Lochluichart, Achnasheen and Kinlochewe along the way. We will arrive in the late afternoon at the Sheildaig Lodge Hotel (http://www.shieldaiglodge.com/) which will be our base for four nights. June 16-18: We will explore Wester Ross. Highlights will include Beinn Eighe National Nature Reserve, Inverewe Gardens, Loch Torridon and the Torridon Countryside Center. We’ll also take a boat trip out to the Summer Isles on Shearwater Summer Isle Cruises out of Ullapool. We’ll have several opportunities to see White-tailed Eagles, Golden Eagles, Black-throated Divers as well as Otters and Seals. June 19: We’ll head north along the west coast of Wester Ross and Sutherland past Loch Assynt and Ardvreck Castle, all the way up tp the north coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Preface
    EDITOR'S PREFACE 'Firthlands' embraces those eastern lowlands clustered around the Dor­ noch, Cromarty, Beauly and Inner Moray Firths. Firthlands of Ross and Sutherland focuses more particularly on the gentle and fertile country around the Dornoch and Cromarty Firths- from Golspie and Loch Fleet in the north, to Bonar Bridge, Tain and the Easter Ross peninsula, across to Cromarty and the Black Isle, and up-firth to Dingwall and Muir of Ord. Of the twelve contrasting chapters, one provides a broad geological background to the area and highlights landscape features as they have evolved through time- the Great Glen and Helmsdale Faults, glacially­ deepened and drowned river valleys, raised beaches, wave-formed shingle barriers. And it is the underlying geology that gave rise to the shape of early habitational and communications networks, to the Brora coal-mines and to the spa waters of Strathpeffer, to stone and sand and gravel and peat for extraction, to the nature and balance of agricultural practice, to the oil and gas fields off the coast. Such economic activity is most apparent for relatively recent times, so that six chapters concentrate on the seventeenth to early twentieth cen­ turies. Some explore trade and family links across to Moray and the Baltic, as well as with other parts of Scotland and beyond; others concentrate on changes in settlement patterns, agriculture and stock-rearing, both in the firthlands and their highland hinterland; yet others are more concerned with a particularly rich architectural heritage.In each case, there is a weave between Highlander and Lowlander, spiced with the ever-increasing exposure of the north to southern influences and pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB Scotland
    RSPB Scotland Letter Writing Briefing Last Chance for Scotland’s Seabirds Our seabirds are the fastest declining group of bird species globally. In Scotland, coastal cliff-tops that were once immense seabird 'cities' have been left like eerily silent ghost towns. The problem will continue to worsen unless the Scottish Government takes action now. The Government is proposing 33 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that will protect some of Scotland’s most amazing marine wildlife, but unfortunately they ignore those most in need of protection - Scotland’s seabirds. MPAs have been proposed in different locations around Scotland’s coast and out at sea. These areas will protect important species and habitats from marine activities that could harm them. MPAs will do a lot to help Scotland’s seas, and the many creatures within them, but unfortunately, they will do nothing for the majority of Scotland’s seabirds. The Scottish Government argue that seabirds are already adequately protected, but this is not the case. We have seen terrible declines in many seabird populations over the last ten years and scientists predict that we could see seabirds go extinct from some parts of the country within the next ten years. We need MPAs that protect areas of national importance for our iconic seabirds, not just areas of European importance, which is currently the case. The proposals for MPAs must be improved. The Scottish Government must designate all the proposed MPAs but also add seabirds to the list of species to be protected. In addition, the Firth of Forth Banks Complex proposed MPA must have sandeels added to the list of species to be protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    ISSN 0036-9144 SCOTTISH BIRDS THE JOURNAL OF THE SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS' CLUB Vol. 10 No. 7 AUTUMN 1979 ORNITHOLIDAYS Member of The Association 1980 of British Travel Agents Holidays organised by Birdwatchers for Birdwatchers INDIA (North) INDIA (Assam) NOVA SCOTIA THE SEYCHELLES AUSTRIAN ALPS TANZANIA PORTUGAL MOROCCO CENTRAL WALES MALAWI ISLES OF SCILLY SRI LANKA ISLE OF MULL VANCOUVER & ROCKIES ISLE OF ISLAY THE GAMBIA THE CAIRNGORMS MAJORCA HEBRIDEAN CRUISES S.W. SPAIN DORSET GREECE SUFFOLK THE CAMARGUE FARNES & BASS ROCK LAKE NEUSIEDL YUGOSLAVIA Particulars sent on receipt of 8p stamp to : LAWRENCE G. HOLLOWAY ORNITHOLlDAYS (Regd) (WESSEX TRAVEL CENTRE) 1/3 VICTORIA DRIVE, BOGNOR REGIS, SUSSEX, England, P021 2PW Telephone 02433 21230 Telegrams : Ornitholidays Bognor Regis. ·000000000000000000000001 COLOUR SLIDES BINOCULAR We are now able to supply REPAIRS slides of most British Birds from our own collection, and from that of the R.S.P.B. CHARLES FRANK LID. Send 25p for sample slide are pleased to offer a special and our lists covering these concession to members of the Scot­ and birds of Africa-many tish Ornithologists' Club. Servicing fine studies and close-ups. and repairs of all makes of binocu­ lars will be undertaken at special FOR HIRE prices. Routine cleaning and re­ We have arranged to hire out aligning costs £5 + £1 post, packing slides of the R.S.P.B. These and insurance. Estimates will be are in sets of 25 at 60p in­ provided should additional work cluding postage & V.A.T. per be required. night's hire. Birds are group­ ed according to their natural Send to The Service Manager habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Selection Document: Summary of the Scientific Case for Site Selection
    West Coast of the Outer Hebrides Proposed Special Protection Area (pSPA) No. UK9020319 SPA Site Selection Document: Summary of the scientific case for site selection Document version control Version and Amendments made and author Issued to date and date Version 1 Formal advice submitted to Marine Scotland on Marine draft SPA. Scotland Nigel Buxton & Greg Mudge 10/07/14 Version 2 Updated to reflect change in site status from draft Marine to proposed in preparation for possible formal Scotland consultation. 30/06/15 Shona Glen, Tim Walsh & Emma Philip Version 3 Updated with minor amendments to address Marine comments from Marine Scotland Science in Scotland preparation for the SPA stakeholder workshop. 23/02/16 Emma Philip Version 4 Revised format, using West Coast of Outer MPA Hebrides as a template, to address comments Project received at the SPA stakeholder workshop. Steering Emma Philip Group 07/04/16 Version 5 Text updated to reflect proposed level of detail for Marine final versions. Scotland Emma Philip 18/04/16 Version 6 Document updated to address requirements of Greg revised format agreed by Marine Scotland. Mudge Glen Tyler & Emma Philip 19/06/16 Version 7 Quality assured Emma Greg Mudge Philip 20/6/16 Version 8 Final draft for approval Andrew Emma Philip Bachell 22/06/16 Version 9 Final version for submission to Marine Scotland Marine Scotland 24/06/16 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Site summary ..................................................................................................... 2 3. Bird survey information .................................................................................... 5 4. Assessment against the UK SPA Selection Guidelines ................................. 7 5. Site status and boundary ................................................................................ 13 6. Information on qualifying species .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Site Condition Monitoring for Otters (Lutra Lutra) in 2011-12
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 521 Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 521 Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 For further information on this report please contact: Rob Raynor Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Findlay, M., Alexander, L. & Macleod, C. 2015. Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 521. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Site condition monitoring for otters (Lutra lutra) in 2011-12 Commissioned Report No. 521 Project No: 12557 and 13572 Contractor: Findlay Ecology Services Ltd. Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Otter; Lutra lutra; monitoring; Special Area of Conservation. Background 44 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) for which otter is a qualifying interest were surveyed during 2011 and 2012 to collect evidence to inform an assessment of the condition of each SAC. 73 sites outside the protected areas network were also surveyed. The combined data were used to look for trends in the recorded otter population in Scotland since the first survey of 1977-79. Using new thresholds for levels of occupancy, and other targets agreed with SNH for the current report, the authors assessed 34 SACs as being in favourable condition, and 10 sites were assessed to be in unfavourable condition.
    [Show full text]