Cornell Law Review Volume 104 Article 4 Issue 3 March 2019 Suicide and Euthanasia: The nI ternational Perspective on the Right to Die Zachary A. Feldman Cornell Law School, J.D. 2018,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law and Society Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Zachary A. Feldman, Suicide and Euthanasia: The International Perspective on the Right to Die, 104 Cornell L. Rev. 715 () Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol104/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. NOTE SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA: THE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE RIGHT TO DIE Zachary A. Feldmanf Several countries across the globe have weighed their in- terests in preserving life, in preventing suicide, and in al- lowing terminally ill patients to end their lives at their own discretion with, or without, the help of a physician. This Note will highlight the inconsistencies injurisdictions that treat sui- cidal ideations both criminally and medically, and ultimately arguesfor a uniform system of laws that govern mental illness internationally. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 715 I. UNITED STATES AND ITS LANDMARK DECISIONS ........ 722 II. PRESERVING LIFE AND DETERRING SUICIDE INTERNATIONALLY .................................. 726 III. CULTURAL NORMS, RELIGIOUS INFLUENCES, AND LEGISLATION ...................................... 729 IV. THIRD PARTIES, UNDUE INFLUENCE, AND THE SLIPPERY SLOPE ............................................ 735 V.