DOCSLIB.ORG

Lechelt Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lechelt Dissertation View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy Allusions of Grandeur: Gigantomachy, Callimachean Poetics, and Literary Filiation A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Christine E. Lechelt IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Advisors: Nita Krevans and Christopher Nappa January 2014 © Christine E. Lechelt 2014 Acknowledgments This dissertation owes much to many people. First, I would like to thank my family for their enormous and unfailing support and encouragement. They have been the Hercules of many seemingly giant battles. I would especially like to thank my parents, David and Mary Lechelt; there simply are not enough words to express my depp and abiding love and gratitude for all that they are and all that they do for me. Katie Lechelt has been my rock; she brought a great deal of patience and a sense of humor to this process, particularly in its late stages. I have been blessed with four grandparents who let me feel their love and pride in the most wonderful and inspiring of ways. I would be remiss if I did not also thank the one who has literally been at my side for nearly every word of this dissertation, my beloved dog Jin Jin. It has been an honor and a privilege to study in the Department of Classical and Near Eastern Studies at the University of Minnesota. I would like to thank the University for the generous fellowships I have received, especially the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship. The department has been incredibly supportive of me in matters both practical and personal. I thank the department staff, especially Barb Lehnhoff and Kate Gallagher, for all the magic they work. I am fortunate to have been part of a group of graduate students whose intellects I admire and have benefitted from greatly, and whose friendships have sustained me. I am deeply grateful to all of them; I especially wish to single out Christy Marquis, Heather Woods, Elizabeth Warner, and Rachael Cullick. i The faculty of CNES have taught me so much and been unbelievably supportive. I especially wish to thank my committee members Philip Sellew and George Sheets. Stephen Smith deserves special mention for all the time and effort he has put into my professional and personal development. His support has meant the world to me, and I simply could not have done it without him. Finally, every word of this dissertation, every contribution I might hope to make, everything I have become and still hope to be as a scholar, has been influenced and inspired by my advisors, Nita Krevans and Christopher Nappa. My admiration and gratitude for them is without measure. ii Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Chapter 1: Fashioning Literary History: Parody Theory and Ancient Texts . 11 Chapter 2: There Were Giants Then: Hesiod’s Theogony . .31 I. The Early History of the Giants . 32 II. The Titanomachy . .36 III. The Seeds of Epic Parody . 44 IV. Typhoeus the Interloper . .46 Chapter 3: Purest Springs of Fire: Giants and Callimachean Poetics in Pythian 1 and 8 . .52 Chapter 4: Like Bees to Deo: Alexandrian Callimachus and the Callimachean Pharoah . 77 I. The Telchines in Pindar and Callimachus . 78 II. The Giants in Callimachus . 86 III. Ptolemaic Kingship and the Gigantomachy . 92 Chapter 5: Propertian Irony and the Limits of Callimacheanism . 104 I. Callimachus Romanus . 108 II. Gigantomachy and the Propertian Recusatio . 132 III. Passing Through the Gigantea ora: Poem 1.20 . .143 iii Chapter 6: Refashioning Literary History: Ovid and the Poetics of Gigantomachy . 150 I. Amores 2.1 and the Poetics of Daring . .151 II. The Metamorphoses and the Poetics of Imitation . 172 III. Tristia 2 and the Poetics of Power . 192 Epilogue: Ovid in Sicily . 207 Conclusion . .211 Bibliography . 215 iv Introduction Perhaps the most famous representation of Gigantomachy in art or literature is the Altar of Zeus at Pergamum. A massive, highly emotionally charged frieze running around the outside of the enclosure to the Altar depicts the gods and giants in their cosmic struggle. Unfortunately, the precise dating, purpose of the Altar, and interpretation of the sculptural program of this Hellenistic monument are all murky and vexed questions. We can say with certainty that the Altar was constructed sometime in the first half of the Second Century BCE.1 The Altar may have celebrated a victory over the Gauls, who are frequently depicted as Giants in Hellenistic and Italian art, but there is no way to know this for certain.2 It is also possible that it was simply a celebration of the prosperity and good fortune of the city of Pergamum. It has been suggested that it represents Stoic cosmological allegory, influenced by a lost work of Cleanthes, On the Giants (Περὶ γιγάντων),3 or that it may be based on a lost epic poem.4 Whatever the inspiration for this monument was, it is clear that, as Pollitt writes, “behind its tumultuous, writhing, theatrical surface, the frieze is a very learned, perhaps at times even academically obscure, monument.”5 There does clearly seem to be a direct connection between the Pergamene Altar and the Parthenon. We know that the Parthenon contained a depiction of Gigantomachy 1 The pottery found around the Altar provides a terminus post quem of 185-170, while the interior capitals are dated to about 160. The first securely dated dedication on its terrace was set up in 149/8, so the Altar must have been in use by then: Stewart (2000) 39. 2 Stewart (2000) 34. On the depictions of the Gauls as Giants in Hellenistic literature and art, see Barbantani (2002-3) and Vian (1952b) 10. 3 See Zanker (2004) 97, Pollitt (1986) 105-9 and Onians (1979) 88 with further references. 4 Stewart (2000) 42. 5 Pollitt (1986) 101. 1 on the eastern metopes, and that the statue of Athena had this myth on her shield.6 Furthermore, the Gigantomachy was the subject of the peplos woven for Athena during the Panathenaic festival.7 Whereas Giants had previously been depicted as fully humanoid hoplites, it seems that under the influence of the depiction on Athena’s shield, Giants start to be shown at this time wearing animal skins and heaving boulders.8 In other words, they have become barbarians, symbols of the chaos that the Athenians had recently subdued in their victory over Persia. The Pergamene Altar appears to allude to the Parthenon, styling Pergamum as the new Athens;9 as Onians remarks, “ . .the Pergamene Gigantomachy is truly a reincarnation of the art of Classical Athens to match the Attic wisdom of the Pergamene library and the Attic heroism of the Pergamene armies.”10 The Altar is certainly not a copy of the Parthenon, however; the Giants have become more extreme in their scale and monstrous appearance. This may be due in part to the influence of traditional Italian depictions of Giants.11 I suggest that it is also a capping device, a way of asserting that Pergamum has in fact surpassed the Athenians. The easiest and most traditional way to explain the Gigantomachy in general is as a political metaphor.12 In the case of the Pergamene Altar, such an interpretation is obviously available. There is something else at work here, however; in fact, the Altar is the perfect distillation of the entire aesthetic and set of artistic concerns that define the Hellenistic period. Perched in the colonnade directly above the Gigantomachy were 6 Pliny 35.54, 36.18. 7 Carpenter (1991) 75. 8 Carpenter (1991) 75. 9 Onians (1979) 81-7. 10 Onians (1979) 87. 11 See de Grummond (2000) 259-61 for an overview of the development of images of Giants in Italy. 12 The classic treatment of Gigantomachy as a political metaphor, in this case in Vergil’s Aeneid, is Hardie (1986). 2 statues of the Muses, perhaps joined by members of the Attalid imperial family.13 The presence of the Muses suggests that the Gigantomachy beneath them is a commentary on art. This is further supported by the contrasting nature of the second frieze inside the monument, the Telephus frieze. Here we find a series of panels depicting the obscure myth of Telephus, a son of Herakles who was heralded as the mythological founder of Pergamum and ancestor of the Attalid dynasty. This suggests that the entire monument, not just the Telephus frieze, is an attempt to link the city of Pergamum with the mythical past of Greece.14 The Telephus frieze has been shown to exhibit many of the qualities we associate with Hellenistic literature in the Callimachean style.15 It tells an obscure myth in a series of snapshots of key moments, leaving the viewer to fill in the details.16 It is fashioned on a different, smaller scale than the Gigantomachy frieze, and places great emphasis on details of landscape and minor characters. Furthermore, the figures are depicted in a more restrained style, with more controlled expressions and movements.17 As Onians writes, “At no stage should it be thought that the opposition between large and small, and their related stylistic traits, meant that the one excluded the other.”18 In this dissertation, I will argue that the form of aesthetics represented by the Pergamene Altar – what in the realm of literature has come to be called Callimacheanism – large and small, Gigantomachy and Telephus relief, exist in a relationship of complexity rather than competition. In literature, “large” means epic and “small” – for Callimacheanism as it 13 Stewart (2000) 41-2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Celia M. Campbell CV 19/20
    Celia M. Campbell Department of Classics [email protected] Emory University 221 E Candler Library Atlanta, GA 30322 EDUCATION DPhil in Latin Language & Literature November 2014 Trinity College, University of Oxford (UK) Supervisor: Professor Matthew Leigh “A Space for Song: Ovid’s Metapoetic Landscapes” MSt in Greek and/or Latin Language and Literature July 2010 Trinity College, University of Oxford (UK) Distinction “The Metamorphoses and Cyclic Epic: Ovid’s Renewal of an Epic Ideology” BA Classics, cum laude June 2009 Williams College (Massachusetts, USA) RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Latin poetry of the late Republic and early Empire; Latin pseudepigrapha; post-Virgilian pastoral (especially Dante’s Latin eclogues); landscape and ecphrasis in Classical Literature; Senecan drama PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS/ EMPLOYMENT Emory University August 2020 Assistant Professor of Classics Florida State University August 2018-May 2020 Dean’s Post-Doctoral Scholar University of Virginia August 2017-July 2018 Assistant Professor, General Faculty Fordham University August 2016- June 2017 Adjunct Instructor New York University January 2016- June 2017 Adjunct Instructor St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford September 2015-January 2016 Lecturer St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October 2014- July 2015 Interim Head of Classics St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October 2013- June 2014 Career Development Fellow Trinity College, University of Oxford October 2011- October 2013 Graduate Tutor St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Texas State Certamen -- Round One, Upper Level Tu
    2000 TEXAS STATE CERTAMEN -- ROUND ONE, UPPER LEVEL TU #1: What girl, abandoned on Naxos, became the bride of Dionysus? ARIADNE B1: Who had abandoned Ariadne, after she had helped to save his life? THESEUS B2: What sister of Ariadne later married Theseus? PHAEDRA TU#2: Who wrote the Epicurean work De Rerum Natura? LUCRETIUS B1: Of what did Lucretius reputedly die? LOVE POTION B2: What famous Roman prepared De Rerum Natura for publishing after the death of Lucretius? CICERO TU #3: Who was turned into a weasel for tricking Eileithyia into allowing Heracles to be born? GALANTHIS B1: Who was the half-brother of Heracles, and the son of Amphitryon? IPHICLES B2: Who was the nephew of Heracles who helped him to kill the Hydra? IOLAUS TU#4: Whose co-consul was Caesar in 59 B.C.? (CALPURNIUS) BIBULUS B1&2: For five points each, name two of the three provinces Caesar oversaw during his first consulship. ILLYRICUM, GALLIA CISALPINA, GALLIA NARBONENSIS/TRANSALPINA (aka PROVINCIA) TU #5: What type of verb are soleÇ, gaudeÇ, and f§dÇ? SEMI-DEPONENT B1: Say ‘I used to rejoice’ in Latin. GAUDEBAM B2; Say ‘I have rejoiced’ in Latin. GAV¦SUS/-A SUM TU#6: Although they were called the Aloadae, Otus and Ephialtes were really the sons of which god? POSEIDON B1: How did the mother of the Aloadae attract Poseidon? STOOD IN THE SEA AND SPLASHED WATER ON HERSELF UNTIL HE IMPREGNATED HER B2: What deity tricked Otus and Ephialtes into killing each other? ARTEMIS TU #7: What was the dinner held on the ninth day after a death called? CENA NOVENDIALIS B1: What was the minimum burial for religious purposes? THREE HANDFULS OF DIRT B2: What was a cenotaphium? A TOMB ERECTED IF THE BODY COULD NOT BE RECOVERED (AN EMPTY TOMB) TU#8: Who called his work nugae? CATULLUS B1: To what fellow author did he dedicate them? CORNELIUS NEPOS B2: Catullus was most famous for his love poetry to what lady? LESBIA/CLODIA TU #9: Romulus and Remus were brothers, but what is the meaning of the Latin word remus? OAR B1: With this in mind, what is a remex? ROWER/OARSMAN B2: Define remigÇ.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 20Th INTERNATIONAL
    INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 20th INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON OLYMPIC STUDIES FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS 1 – 29 SEPTEMBER 2013 PROCEEDINGS ANCIENT OLYMPIA Published by the International Olympic Academy and the International Olympic Committee 2014 International Olympic Academy 52, Dimitrios Vikelas Avenue 152 33 Halandri – Athens GREECE Tel.: +30 210 6878809-13, +30 210 6878888 Fax: +30 210 6878840 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ioa.org.gr Editor Prof. Konstantinos Georgiadis, IOA Honorary Dean Editorial coordination Roula Vathi ISBN: 978-960-9454-29-2 INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY 20th INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON OLYMPIC STUDIES FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS SPECIAL SUBJECT THE LEGACY OF THE OLYMPIC GAMES: INFRASTRUCTURE, ART, QUALITY OF LIFE AND ECONOMICAL PARAMETERS ANCIENT OLYMPIA EPHORIA OF THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC ACADEMY (2013) President Isidoros KOUVELOS (HOC Member) Vice-President Michail FYSSENTZIDIS (HOC Member) Members Charalambos NIKOLAOU (IOC Member – ex officio member) Spyridon CAPRALOS (HOC President – ex officio member) Emmanuel KATSIADAKIS (HOC Secretary General – ex officio member) Evangelos SOUFLERIS (HOC Member) Efthimios KOTZAS (Mayor of Ancient Olympia) Christina KOULOURI Dora PALLI Honorary President Jacques ROGGE (Former IOC President) Honorary Members Τ.A. Ganda SITHOLE (Director of International Coope ra tion and Development Dpt., IOC) Pere MIRÓ (Director, Olympic Solidarity, IOC) Honorary Dean Konstantinos GEORGIADIS Director Dionyssis GANGAS 5 HELLENIC OLYMPIC COMMITTEE (2013) President Spyridon I. CAPRALOS 1st
    [Show full text]
  • Entre Ombre Et Lumière : Les Voix Féminines Dans Les Métamorphoses
    Entre ombre et lumière : les voix féminines dans les Métamorphoses Hélène Vial Fondée sur l’articulation entre les passions des âmes et les métamorphoses des corps, l’esthétique des Métamorphoses d’Ovide délivre à la fois une vision audacieuse du monde et une conception neuve de l’entreprise poétique, le texte ovidien étant investi d’une très forte dimension réflexive due notamment à la correspondance exacte entre son sujet, la métamorphose, et sa forme, une écriture de la variation1. Or, la densité métalittéraire du poème est particulièrement grande dans les passages où se trouvent associés deux motifs qui constituent le sujet même du présent volume : celui de la voix et celui de la féminité. D’une part, la question de la voix est centrale dans les Métamorphoses ; d’autre part, les mythes féminins y sont très nombreux et d’une grande richesse symbolique ; et quand le poète relie l’une aux autres, la voix féminine apparaît dotée d’une capacité particulièrement saillante « à être inductric[e] de poésie », comme le disait l’appel à communication du séminaire qui a donné naissance à ce livre2, autrement dit à faire signe vers l’écriture et à parler du projet poétique dans son entier. C’est cette capacité qui constitue l’objet de mon analyse : dans la foule des silhouettes mythiques qui traversent les Métamorphoses et dont la voix nous est donnée à entendre, y a-t- il une spécificité féminine ? Et plus précisément, que nous disent sur la conception ovidienne de la poésie les paroles prononcées par ces figures féminines de l’ombre et du mystère3
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MYTH of ORPHEUS and EURYDICE in WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., Universi
    THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., University of Toronto, 1957 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY in the Department of- Classics We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, i960 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada. ©he Pttttrerstt^ of ^riitsl} (Eolimtbta FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAMME OF THE FINAL ORAL EXAMINATION FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A. University of Toronto, 1953 M.A. University of Toronto, 1957 S.T.B. University of Toronto, 1957 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1960 AT 3:00 P.M. IN ROOM 256, BUCHANAN BUILDING COMMITTEE IN CHARGE DEAN G. M. SHRUM, Chairman M. F. MCGREGOR G. B. RIDDEHOUGH W. L. GRANT P. C. F. GUTHRIE C. W. J. ELIOT B. SAVERY G. W. MARQUIS A. E. BIRNEY External Examiner: T. G. ROSENMEYER University of Washington THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN Myth sometimes evolves art-forms in which to express itself: LITERATURE Politian's Orfeo, a secular subject, which used music to tell its story, is seen to be the forerunner of the opera (Chapter IV); later, the ABSTRACT myth of Orpheus and Eurydice evolved the opera, in the works of the Florentine Camerata and Monteverdi, and served as the pattern This dissertion traces the course of the myth of Orpheus and for its reform, in Gluck (Chapter V).
    [Show full text]
  • Between Arcadia and Crete: Callisto in Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus The
    Between Arcadia and Crete: Callisto in Callimachus’ Hymn to Zeus The speaker of Callimachus’ Hymn to Zeus famously asks Zeus himself whether he should celebrate the god as “Dictaean,” i.e. born on Mt. Dicte in Crete, or “Lycaean,” born on Arcadian Mt. Lycaeus (4-7). When the response comes, “Κρῆτες ἀεὶ ψεῦσται” (“Cretans are always liars,” 8), the hymnist agrees, and for support recalls that the Cretans built a tomb for Zeus, who is immortal (8-9). In so dismissing Cretan claims to truth, the hymnist justifies an Arcadian setting for his ensuing birth narrative (10-41). Curiously, however, after recounting Zeus’s birth and bath, the hymnist suddenly locates the remainder of the god’s early life in Crete after all (42-54). The transition is surprising, not only because it runs counter to the previous rejection of Cretan claims, but also because the Arcadians themselves held that Zeus was both born and raised in Arcadia (Paus. 8.38.2). While scholars have focused on how the ambiguity of two place names (κευθμὸν... Κρηταῖον, 34; Θενάς/Θεναί, 42, 43) misleads the audience and/or prepares them for the abrupt move from Arcadia to Crete (Griffiths 1970 32-33; Arnott 1976 13-18; McLennan 1977 66, 74- 75; Tandy 1979 105, 115-118; Hopkinson 1988 126-127), this paper proposes that the final word of the birth narrative, ἄρκτοιο (“bear,” 41), plays an important role in the transition as well. This reference to Callisto a) allusively justifies the departure from Arcadia, by suggesting that the Arcadians are liars not unlike the Cretans; b) prepares for the hymnist’s rejection of the Cretan account of Helice; and c) initiates a series of heavenly ascents that binds the Arcadian and Cretan portions of the hymn and culminates climactically with Zeus’s own accession to the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean Maria Pavlou
    Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean Maria Pavlou ACCHYLIDES 17, a Cean commission performed on Delos, has been the subject of extensive study and is Bmuch admired for its narrative artistry, elegance, and excellence. The ode was classified as a dithyramb by the Alex- andrians, but the Du-Stil address to Apollo in the closing lines renders this classification problematic and has rather baffled scholars. The solution to the thorny issue of the ode’s generic taxonomy is not yet conclusive, and the dilemma paean/ dithyramb is still alive.1 In fact, scholars now are more inclined to place the poem somewhere in the middle, on the premise that in antiquity the boundaries between dithyramb and paean were not so clear-cut as we tend to believe.2 Even though I am 1 Paean: R. Merkelbach, “Der Theseus des Bakchylides,” ZPE 12 (1973) 56–62; L. Käppel, Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung (Berlin 1992) 156– 158, 184–189; H. Maehler, Die Lieder des Bakchylides II (Leiden 1997) 167– 168, and Bacchylides. A Selection (Cambridge 2004) 172–173; I. Rutherford, Pindar’s Paeans (Oxford 2001) 35–36, 73. Dithyramb: D. Gerber, “The Gifts of Aphrodite (Bacchylides 17.10),” Phoenix 19 (1965) 212–213; G. Pieper, “The Conflict of Character in Bacchylides 17,” TAPA 103 (1972) 393–404. D. Schmidt, “Bacchylides 17: Paean or Dithyramb?” Hermes 118 (1990) 18– 31, at 28–29, proposes that Ode 17 was actually an hyporcheme. 2 B. Zimmermann, Dithyrambos: Geschichte einer Gattung (Hypomnemata 98 [1992]) 91–93, argues that Ode 17 was a dithyramb for Apollo; see also C.
    [Show full text]
  • Wjcl Certamen 2016 Advanced Division Round One
    WJCL CERTAMEN 2016 ADVANCED DIVISION ROUND ONE 1. Brontes, Steropes, and Arges were the name of these beings that helped Hephaestus in his forge under Mt. Etna. What is the name typically given to these three? CYCLOPES B1. Cottus, Briareus, and Gyges are the names of what beings with fifty heads and one hundred hands? HECATONCHEIRES B2. The Cyclopes and Hecatoncheires were siblings. Name their parents. URANUS AND GAIA 2. From what Latin verb with what meaning is the English word “tactile” derived? TANGŌ, TANGERE MEANING TO TOUCH B1. From what Latin verb with what meaning is the English word “nuptial” derived? NŪBŌ, NŪBERE MEANING TO MARRY/VEIL B2. From what Latin verb with what meaning is the English word “pensive” derived? PENDŌ, PENDERE MEANING TO HANG/WEIGH 3. Which governor of Syria declared himself emperor upon hearing a rumor that Marcus Aurelius had died and continued his revolt even after learning that Marcus Aurelius was alive? AVIDIUS CASSIUS B1. Which governor of Germania Superior led a rebellion against the emperor Domitian in 89 CE but failed due to a sudden thaw of the Rhine that prevented his allies from joining him? LUCIUS ANTONIUS SATURNINUS B2. Which governor of Syria declared himself emperor when Pertinax died and was defeated in battle, then killed while fleeing to Parthia? PESCENNIUS NIGER 4. What Latin word most nearly means “a groan”? GEMITUS, GEMITŪS B1. What Latin word most nearly means “reputation”? FĀMA, FAMAE B2. What Latin word most nearly means “fleet”? CLASSIS, CLASSIS 5. What author describes the plague of Athens in a didactic work edited by Cicero entitled De Rerum Natura? LUCRETIUS B1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FINAL LINE in CALLIMACHUS' HYMN to APOLLO Giuseppe Gian Grande
    http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/Habis.1992.i23.05 THE FINAL LINE IN CALLIMACHUS' HYMN TO APOLLO Giuseppe Gian grande King' s College, London Un examen del verso final del Himno a Apolo de Calímaco dentro del marco de las teorías poéticas calimaqueas lleva a la conclusión de que la lectura OBóvos- es genuina, mientras que la variante .950ópoç es una trivialización. An analysis of the final une of Callimachus Hymn to Apollo, conducted within the framework of the poet' s literary theories, shows that the reading 006- voç is genuine, whereas the variant 006pos- is a trivialization. The final une in Callimachus' Hymn to Apollo has been the subject of copious debate during the last centuries. Fortunately for us, most of the relevant material has been assembled by F. Williams, in his doctoral dissertation which was directed by me at my Classics Research Centre, University of London, so that I can now conveniently refer the readers to the monograph in question 1 • As is well known, the problem consists in choosing between the variants 00óvos- or 00ópoç in fine 113. The editiones veteres, as Ernesti noted in his commentary ad loc. 2, read xaí'pe cYval'. 6 8é- .1114.1os-, 1'v '6 00óvos-, gvOci ué-otTO 1 F. Williams, Callimachus' Hymn to Apollo (Oxford 1978) 96 ff. 2 Jo. Aug. Emesti, Callimachi Hymni, Epigrammata el Fragmenta I (Lugduni Batavorum 1761) 65. 53 HABIS 23 (1992) 53-62 THE FINAL LINE IN CALLIMACHUS' HYMN TO APOLLO but the variant ~vos- was rejected by Emesti, who judged 00ópos- to be the cor- rect one.
    [Show full text]