Permian and Triassic Rifting in Northwest Europe, Geological Society Special Publication No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Permian and Triassic Rifting in Northwest Europe, Geological Society Special Publication No Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 From Boldy, S. A. R. (ed.), 1995, Permian and Triassic Rifting in Northwest Europe, Geological Society Special Publication No. 91,' 1-5 Permian and Triassic rifting in northwest Europe K. W. GLENNIE University of Aberdeen, UK The Permo-Triassic roughly coincided with the life span of Pangaea. So far as Europe is concerned, Pangaea's creation began in the early Carboniferous (Visean) when the northward-drifting megacontinent Gondwana began to collide with the Iberian portion of the slower moving Laurussia, while Proto-Tethys was subducted beneath the southern margin of central Europe. Creation was complete by the end of the Carboniferous or early in the Permian with the final development of the Variscan orogenic belt, which trends from Brittany eastward through central Europe, and with the addition of western Siberia along the line of the Ural orogen (Ziegler 1989). Despite, or perhaps because of, its bulk, Pangaea was not a stable megacontinent. No sooner had it formed than it tried to break apart again. The disintegration of Pangaea had already started before the end of the Triassic with the westerly extension of Tethys between Iberia and Africa, though not yet underlain by oceanic crust, and, by early in the Jurassic, rifting was taking place between Africa and the Americas in the newly forming Central Atlantic Ocean (Ziegler 1988). Indeed, E-W extensional movements within a Proto-Atlantic Ocean possibly began as early as the Late Carboniferous (Haszeldine & Russell 1987), whilst mid-Permian extension is well documented in East Greenland (Surlyk et al. 1984). These extensional movements may have propagated southward to initiate fracturing in the Viking and Central Grabens of the North Sea, along which the Late Permian Zechstein Sea was to break into the subsiding Rotliegend basins, and towards the Central Atlantic, where a shallow seaway eventually developed early in the Jurassic. Thus in the northern half of Pangaea, the continued existence of the former Laurussia was already at risk in the Permian, although crustal separation in the North Atlantic, which possibly started in the Rockall Trough in the Early Cretaceous, was finally achieved along the line of the Reykjanes Ridge only in the Paleocene. These major events on the periphery of what is now Europe, separately and jointly, were factors that probably controlled a whole sequence of tectonic events within the continent, which, in turn, controlled its patterns of mostly terrestrial sedimentation. Climatically, the northward drift of Laurussia had carried NW Europe from a region of equatorial rain forest during the later Carboniferous to the latitudes of a trade wind desert, like the modern Sahara, in the Permian. The Late Permian basins of Upper Rotliegend and Zechstein deposition were arid. Rotliegend sediments are characterized by dune sand and the saline mudstones of a semipermanent desert lake, and the Zechstein by shallow-water carbonates and anhydrite and deeper-water halite. During the Triassic, however, brackish-water fluvial and lacustrine sediments occupied the basinal areas, although even here, halite horizons (e.g. Rrt, Muschelkalk and Keuper in the North Sea area) associated with local transgressions from Tethys, testify that arid conditions were never far away. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 2 K.W. GLENNIE The Variscan Orogeny seems to have been doomed to failure; it was to become a range of highlands but not a major mountain range. No sooner had it formed than it began to collapse, with the coeval development of a very widespread NW-SE and conjugate NE-SW system of fractures through it and across its northern foreland. This may have been the outcome of a right-lateral reorientation of the relative movement between the former Laurussia and Gondwana (Ziegler 1990). Some of these fractures were obviously extensional as many were associated with igneous activity concentrated around 290-295 Ma BP; this comprised dyke swarms and sills as well as tufts and basaltic lavas of the Lower Rotliegend volcanics (Dixon et al. 1981; Sorensen and Martinsen 1987). Thermal subsidence of the Permian basins of the North Sea area seems to have begun about 20 Ma after the end of the main volcanic activity and was most marked over North Germany, which was the site of the strongest Lower Rotliegend volcanism and the development of a system of associated horsts and grabens (e.g. Gast 1988). The timing and amount of rifting associated with the North Sea graben system is still a matter of some dispute. Some workers (e.g. Ziegler 1990, and others), believe that rifting of the North Sea grabens was not initiated until the Triassic. They base much of their interpretation on seismic data (e.g. failure to recognize Zechstein halite in the middle portion of the Central Graben, even though there is good evidence elsewhere of the local removal of halite by solution; Johnson et al. 1986). In the deeper parts of structurally and stratigraphically complex areas such as the Central Graben, however, it is very difficult to recognize on seismic lines all lithologies of various ages, let alone decide on that basis just when rifting began, especially if initially it had gone through both transtensional and transpressional phases of movement. Other workers, including the author (e.g. Glennie 1990a,b), consider that rifting probably began during the Early Permian. Such rifting was possibly coeval with rotation of the north-trending series of en echelon half grabens (Worcester, Cheshire Basin, etc.) as well as intra-Variscan basins such as the Western Approaches and Celtic Sea Basins. This interpretation would seem to be supported in the North Sea area by the occurrence of Lower Rotliegend volcanism in the Central, Horn and Oslo Grabens, and by the preservation of Zechstein halite within the South Viking Graben together with Rotliegend dune sands as far north as the Beryl Embayment. The Zechstein Sea is believed to have flooded the Rotliegend basins with water of boreal origin via this route (Glennie and Buller 1983) rather than through the Bakevellia Sea and around the southern edge of the Pennine uplift, for which there is no supporting evidence. Debate is still generated concerning the style and amount of North Sea extension (e.g. Gibbs 1987; Latin et al. 1990). There is general agreement that the most active phase of crustal extension took place during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous time span, but there is no concensus on the relative contributions of the Triassic and earlier Jurassic Periods. Despite associated volcanic activity, a possible Permian component is usually ignored, whereas apart from the mid-Jurassic volcanics at the Moray Firth-Viking-Central Graben trilete junction, Late Jurassic extension across the Central Graben was not associated with volcanic activity. B-factors vary from worker to worker depending on the style of extension assumed and the time spans during which crustal stretching is considered to have been operative (e.g. Sclater and Celerier 1988, and associated articles). Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 PERMIAN AND TRIASSIC RIFTING IN NW EUROPE 3 The cross-sectional geometry of Triassic sequences within the East Shetland Basin clearly indicates that in that area extension was related to fault-block rotation, which was accentuated in the Late Jurassic. A controlling factor must have been the proximity of the North Viking Graben, which limits the eastern margin of the East Shetland Basin, but little is known about the timing or amount of extension within that graben, where Permian strata may be as much as 10 km below present sea level (Ziegler 1990). Apart from the marine Zechstein and Muschelkalk sequences, the Permo- Triassic of NW Europe consists largely of arid or semiarid terrestrial sediments that are very poorly dated. Fossils generally are either absent or non-diagnostic for age. Because of a lack of faunal or floral control, the apparent age of some sedimentary sequences has been changed in recent years from Triassic to Permian on the basis of regional correlations. For instance, following interpretations in vogue during the 1930s (Sherlock 1948), no sediments of Permian age are shown in the West Midlands of England on the 1948 edition of the Geological Survey Map of Great Britain. North Sea exploration has now made it likely that at least part of this sequence is Permian in age (e.g. the Bridgnorth Sandstone: Smith et al. 1974; Karpeta 1990; Warrington et al. 1980); the 1979 edition of the same map has advanced only by designating much of the sequence as undifferentiated Permian and Triassic. Other than the radiometric ages of igneous rocks, which are still few and far between, there is an almost complete lack of dating in many of the smaller red-bed basins of presumed Permo-Triassic age in NW Europe. Germany seems to be better off in this respect, and is able to use Russian faunal stages for the Permian, controlled to a limited extent by magnetostratigraphy (Gebhardt et al. 1991). Further west, rare palynofloras are beginning to provide a little control, but in their absence, as is the case northwest of the Scottish mainland, even seismic correlation from one isolated half graben to the next is, at best, conjectural, and New Red Sandstone cannot be separated from its Devonian Old Red counterpart with any confidence. The Permo-Triassic had a time span of some 90 Ma. On the basis of radiometric dating of Westphalian lavas in Germany, it now seems likely that the Permo- Carboniferous transition occurred about 300 Ma ago (Lippolt et al. 1984; Leeder 1988). Following Lower Rotliegend volcanism, much of the greater North Sea area seems to have been the site of erosion or non-deposition for up to 20 Ma or more (Saalian Unconformity: see Table 1 in Brown 1991) before Upper Rotliegend deposition began.
Recommended publications
  • Paleozoic Petroleum Systems on the NCS – Fake, Fiction Or Reality?
    Extended Abstract Paleozoic Petroleum Systems on the NCS – Fake, Fiction or Reality? What is presently Known & What Implications May such Source Rock Systems Have – Today - in terms of Exploration? SWOT Prof. Dr. Dag A. Karlsen, Univ of Oslo The Jurassic source rock systems continue to form the backbone for exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf NCS), with hitherto only 5 oil accumulations proven to be from Cretaceous source rocks, and with Triassic source rock contributions mainly occurring in the Barents Sea. At the “other end of the stratigraphy” we have the Paleozoic rocks. Paleozoic source rocks were recognized early in Scandinavia, e.g. the Alum shale, which we today know to have generated petroleum during the Caledonian Orogeny (Foreland Basin), bitumen found now in odd-ball places in Sweden e.g. at Østerplane and at the Silje Crater Lake and also in Norway. It took until 1995 until we could, via geochemical analytical work on migrated bitumen from the Helgeland Basin (6609/11-1), with some certainty point to migrated oil from a possible Devonian source (affinity to Beatrice & the Orkney shales). Also around 1995, we could suggest bitumen from the 7120/2-1, later realized as one of the wells in the Alta Discovery v.200m dolomite Ørn/Falk Fm) to be of a non-Mesozoic origin, and possibly from a Paleozoic source, and geologist at RWE-Dea and later Lundin started to consider the Paleozoic reservoir systems at Loppa High and also the possibility of Triassic and Permian source rocks as a play model. Why did it take the scientific and exploration environment in Norway so long time to consider source rock systems outside the Jurassic as important? Part of the reason is the great success of the Jurassic Plays on the NCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Ussher Society
    Proceedings of the Ussher Society Research into the geology and geomorphology of south-west England Volume 6 Part 3 1986 Edited by G.M Power The Ussher Society Objects: To promote research into the geology and geomorphology of south- west England and the surrounding marine areas; to hold Annual Conferences at various places in South West England where those engaged in this research can meet formally to hear original contributions and progress reports and informally to effect personal contacts; to publish, proceedings of such Conferences or any other work which the Officers of the Society may deem suitable. Officers: Chairman Dr. C.T. Scrutton Vice-Chairman Dr. E. B. Selwood Secretary Mr M.C. George Treasurer Mr R.C. Scrivener Editor Dr. G.M. Power Committee Members Dr G. Warrington Mr. C. R. Morey Mr. C.D.N. Tubb Mr. C. Cornford Mr D. Tucker Membership of the Ussher Society is open to all on written application to the Secretary and payment of the subscription due on January lst each year. Back numbers may be purchased from the Secretary to whom correspondence should be directed at the following address: Mr M. C. George, Department of Geology, University of Exeter, North Park Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QE Proceedings of the Ussher Society Volume 6 Part 3 1986 Edited by G.M. Power Crediton, 1986 © Ussher Society ISSN 0566-3954 1986 Typeset, printed and bound bv Phillips & Co., The Kyrtonia Press, 115 High Street, Crediton, Devon EXl73LG Set in Baskerville and Printed by Photolithography Proceedings of the Ussher Society Volume 6, Part 3, 1986 Papers D.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Stratigraphic Evolution of the Mid North Sea High Region of the UK Continental Shelf
    Downloaded from http://pg.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on March 31, 2020 Accepted Manuscript Petroleum Geoscience Structural and Stratigraphic Evolution of the Mid North Sea High Region of the UK Continental Shelf Rachel E. Brackenridge, John R. Underhill, Rachel Jamieson & Andrew Bell DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2019-076 This article is part of the Under-explored plays and frontier basins of the UK continental shelf collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/under-explored-plays-and-frontier-basins- of-the-uk-continental-shelf Received 30 May 2019 Revised 25 November 2019 Accepted 23 January 2020 © 2020 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics To cite this article, please follow the guidance at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/~/media/Files/GSL/shared/pdfs/Publications/AuthorInfo_Text.pdf?la=en Manuscript version: Accepted Manuscript This is a PDF of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting and correction before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Although reasonable efforts have been made to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea Geology
    Technical Report TR_008 Technical report produced for Strategic Environmental Assessment – SEA2 NORTH SEA GEOLOGY Produced by BGS, August 2001 © Crown copyright TR_008.doc Strategic Environmental Assessment - SEA2 Technical Report 008 - Geology NORTH SEA GEOLOGY Contributors: Text: Peter Balson, Andrew Butcher, Richard Holmes, Howard Johnson, Melinda Lewis, Roger Musson Drafting: Paul Henni, Sheila Jones, Paul Leppage, Jim Rayner, Graham Tuggey British Geological Survey CONTENTS Summary...............................................................................................................................3 1. Geological history and petroleum geology including specific SEA2 areas ......................5 1.1 Northern and central North Sea...............................................................................5 1.1.1 Geological history ........................................................................................5 1.1.1.1 Palaeozoic ....................................................................................5 1.1.1.2 Mesozoic ......................................................................................5 1.1.1.3 Cenozoic.......................................................................................8 1.1.2 Petroleum geology.......................................................................................9 1.1.3 Petroleum geology of SEA2 Area 3 .............................................................9 1.2 Southern North Sea...............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Dinantian Carbonate Development and Related Prospectivity of the Onshore Northern Netherlands
    Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Author: Nynke Hoornveld Supervisors: Bastiaan Jaarsma, EBN Utrecht Prof. Dr. Jan de Jager, VU University Amsterdam Master Thesis: Solid Earth, (450199 and 450149) 39 ECTS. VU University Amsterdam 01-06-2013 Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Contents Contents……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………..3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….……4 Geological History of the Netherlands relating to Dinantian development…………………………..……………..7 Tectonic history…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Stratigraphy of the Carboniferous…………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands……………………………………………………………….………23 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..26 Seismic interpretation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…27 Time-depth conversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...35 Well correlation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…38 Carbonate production, precipitation and geometries, with a focus on the Dinantian……….………40 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..57 Well information, evaluation and reservoir development………………………………………………………..58 Geometry of the Dinantian carbonate build-ups in the Dutch Northern onshore…………..……….75 The geological history
    [Show full text]
  • The Quaternary Geology of the North Sea Basin
    The Quaternary geology of the North Sea basin Emrys Phillips 1, David M. Hodgson 2 and Andy R. Emery 2 1. British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK ([email protected]) 2. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK ([email protected]) Introduction – the Quaternary of the North Sea basin and its importance The North Sea is a shallow (~50 to 400 m deep), ~500 km wide marine embayment that separates the UK from Scandinavia and northern Europe (Figure 1). This epicontinental shelf area has had a long and complex geological history with its present‐day structural configuration largely being the result of rifting during the Jurassic–Early Cretaceous, followed by thermal subsidence (Glennie and Underhill, 1998; Zanella and Coward, 2003). Since the middle Cenozoic, the Central Graben region of the North Sea Basin has accumulated up to 3000 m of Oligocene to Holocene sediments, which locally includes more than 800 m of Quaternary sediments (Caston, 1977, 1979; Gatliff et al., 1994). Although a detailed understanding of the depositional history recorded by this sedimentary succession is yet to be fully established, these sediments preserve evidence for the advance and retreat of several ice sheets into the North Sea from the adjacent landmasses at different times during the Quaternary. These ice masses not only resulted in periodic erosion, but also made a significant depositional contribution to the infill of the basin. The traditional view of the Quaternary (Pleistocene)
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeozoic Petroleum Systems of the Central North Sea/Mid North Sea High
    CR/15/124; Draft 0.1 Last modified: 2016/03/30 17:22 Palaeozoic Petroleum Systems of the Central North Sea/Mid North Sea High Energy and Marine Geoscience Programme Commissioned Report CR/15/124 CR/15/124; Draft 0.1 Last modified: 2016/03/30 17:22 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ENERGY AND MARINE GEOSCIENCE PROGRAMME COMMISSIONED REPORT CR/15/124 Palaeozoic Petroleum Systems of the Central North Sea/Mid North Sea High A A Monaghan & S. Arsenikos, E Callaghan, R Ellen, C Gent, S The National Grid and other Hannis, A Henderson, G Leslie, K Johnson, M Kassyk, T Kearsey, Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights A Kim, G Kimbell, M Quinn, W McLean, D Millward, T Pharaoh, 2015. Ordnance Survey Licence M Sankey, N Smith, C Ugana, C Vane, C Vincent, P Williamson No. 100021290 EUL. Keywords Palaeozoic; CNS, petroleum systems. Front cover Core from well 43/17- 2 at 3170 m in sandstone and mudstone of the Millstone Grit Formation. BGS©NERC. All Rights Reserved 2016 Bibliographical reference MONAGHAN A A AND THE PROJECT TEAM. 2015. Palaeozoic Petroleum Systems of the Central North Sea/Mid North Sea High. British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/15/124. 105pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt-Influenced Normal Faulting Related to Salt-Dissolution And
    SALT-INFLUENCED NORMAL FAULTING RELATED TO SALT-DISSOLUTION AND EXTENSIONAL TECTONICS: 3D SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE SALT VALLEY SALT WALL, UTAH AND DANISH CENTRAL GRABEN, NORTH SEA by Mohammad Naqi Copyright by Mohammad Naqi 2016 All Rights Reserved i A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date _________________________ Signed: _______________________ Mohammad Naqi Signed: _______________________ Dr. Bruce Trudgill Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date _________________________ Signed: _______________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Department Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The northeastern Paradox basin is characterized by a series of salt cored anticlines (salt walls) trending NW-SE. The crestal areas of the salt cored anticlines are breached and cut by faults, forming downthrown valleys, created by the subsidence of the crestal overburden. There has been a prolonged debate on the causative mechanism of subsidence of the anticline crests. Some researchers, based on field observations favor salt-dissolution of the salt forming the core of the anticlines as the main mechanism for the crestal subsidence. Others based on physical modeling favor extensional tectonics as the main mechanism that triggered subsidence. A wider variety of salt structural styles are present in the Danish Salt Dome Province of the Danish Central Graben, ranging from salt diapirs that penetrate their overlying sedimentary cover, to gentle, non-penetrating salt-cored anticlines. Salt structures present as pillows (e.g. the Kraka salt pillow), diapirs (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the North Sea and Skagerrak, :; Aarhus University, 1993 :
    JL-y VJ XJ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK SERIES C* NO. 12 C)<cO ZB ZZ (V£Sr ■ ZiH - - Z‘-iOh, "T-rTF Proceedings of the1V- 2nd SymposraniQn:||||||;,v Marine Geology V ■ - . *•••'• ■ ' rw- . ■ "it. : , - Geology of the North Sea and Skagerrak, :; Aarhus University, 1993 : - EDITOR ,2 ## OLAF MICHELSEN - -. M-r U "■Kv-T-L-. ...L- . ■••■;••• ■. T; •: MAS Uffsa ^iaai %iTH!BUT:GN OF CCCL^EHT :S U^.;,RTTL Miljo- og Energiministeriet • Kobenhavn 1995 Ministry of Environment and Energy • Copenhagen 1995 r vjjdwjuwivajl SURVEY UE DENMARK « SERIES C NO. 12 Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Marine Geology: Geology of the North Sea and Skagerrak, Aarhus Universitet, 1993 RED AKT0R / EDITOR OLAF MICHELSEN K Miljp- og Energiministeriet • Kpbenhavn 1995 Ministry of Environment and Energy • Copenhagen 1995 JJtTtUGEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK SERIES C NO. 12 Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Marine Geology: Geology of the North Sea and Skagerrak, Aarhus Universitet, 1993 RED AKT0R / EDITOR OLAF MICHELSEN Miljp- og Energiministeriet • Kpbenhavn 1995 Ministry of Environment and Energy • Copenhagen 1995 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Marine Geology: Geology of the North Sea and Skagerrak Aarhus Universitet, 1993 Editor: Olaf Michelsen Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................... 4 Authors addresses ............................................................................................................. 5 Origin of a deep buried valley system in Pleistocene deposits of the eastern North Sea. Inger Salomonsen......................................................... 7 Mid-Miocene progradational barrier island and back-barrier deposits, central Jylland, Denmark. S0ren A. V. Nielsen and Lars H. Nielsen............................................................................. 21 Tertiary fluvial deposits of Jylland, Addit area.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the EUROPROBE Meeting on the TRANS
    Proceedings of the EUROPROBE meeting on the TRANS-EUROPEAN SUTURE ZONE, held at Liblice, Czech Republic, October 17-22, 1993, for publication by the Czech Academy of Sciences. THE CONCEALED CALEDONIDE BASEMENT OF EASTERN ENGLAND AND THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA - A REVIEW 1Tim Pharaoh, 2Richard England and 1Mick Lee 1. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Notts., NG12 5GG, UK. 2. B.I.R.P.S., Bullard Research Laboratories, Cambridge, UK. Abstract The Precambrian and early Palaeozoic ('Caledonian') metamorphic basement of E England and the southern North Sea comprises a number of distinct structural elements. The Midlands Microcraton was a persistent structural element throughout the early Palaeozoic. It lay in the back-arc region of subduction-related magmatic arc systems in Ordovician time, and was probably emergent. In Silurian time, it formed a fault-bounded platform distinct from deep water basins in Wales, N England and E Anglia. Acadian deformation and metamorphism was rather weak. The Concealed Caledonides of E England have a NW-SE structural grain and were more intensely deformed and metamorphosed by the Acadian orogenic phase. Deep seismic reflection surveys in the offshore part of this belt indicate the presence of inclined zones of reflectivity in the mid-crust, interpreted as thrusts. The age of these structures is uncertain. They could have formed during the collision of the Avalonia Microplate with Baltica in late Ordovician time, or could be entirely Acadian structures. The Dowsing-South Hewett Fault Zone (DSHFZ) is a long-lived crustal lineament, reactivated throughout late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic time. A dipping reflector at the Moho and in the upper mantle, has been mapped parallel to, and just coastward of, the fault zone, and may mark the trace of an Ordovician subduction zone and/or crustal suture.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Geology of East Siberia by James W. Clarke Open-File Report
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Petroleum geology of East Siberia by James W. Clarke Open-File Report 85-367 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, l . Reston, Virginia 1985 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 3 Geog raphy * 3 Acknowledgments 6 Structure 6 Crustal thickness 6 Structure of basement 8 Aldan-Anabar structural subdivision 8 Tunguska structural subdivision 10 Relief of basement surface 10 Structure of sedimentary cover 10 Structures of the Pre-Mesozoic part of the East Siberian platform 12 Structures of the Mesozoic marginal depressions 15 Stratigraphy and paleogeography 16 Introduction 16 Riphean series 16 Vendian series 19 Cambrian system 22 Ordovician system 36 Lower Ordovician 36 Middle Ordovician 36 Upper Ordovician 36 Silurian system 40 Llandoverian stage 40 Wenlockian stage 40 Ludlovian stage 40 Devonian system 44 Lower Devonian 44 Middle Devonian 44 Upper Devonian 48 Carboniferous system 48 Lower Carboniferous 48 Middle-Upper Carboniferous 50 Permian system 50 Lower Permian 50 Upper Permian 53 Triassic system 55 Tunguska-Kotuy facies region 55 Lena-Vilyuy facies region 57 Lower Triassic 57 Middle Triassic 57 Upper Triassic 57 Jurassic system 60 Lower Jurassic 60 Middle Jurassic 62 Upper Jurassic 62 CONTENTS (continued) Page Cretaceous system 64 Lower Cretaceous 64 Upper Cretaceous 67 History of petroleum exploration 68 Petroleum geology 69 Lena-Tunguska oil-gas province 69 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Early to Mid-Cretaceous Tectonics and Unconformities of the Wessex Basin (Southern England)
    Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 149, 1992, pp. 443454, 12 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland Early to mid-Cretaceous tectonics and unconformities of the Wessex Basin (southern England) A. H. RUFFELL Department of Geology, Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT7 INN, UK Abstract: Sediment distribution patterns, time-subsidence plots, seismic data and outcropanalysis of the Lower Cretaceous (?Ryazanian-Albian) of the Wessex Basin, southern England, suggest that a number of unconformablehorizons exist and that there is no single ‘late Cimmerian unconformity’ surface. A tectonic change, from areally restricted deposition in the Weald and Channel sub-basins to extensive sedimentation across the whole of southern England, began in the mid-Aptian. This change ended with transgression of basement ‘highs’ in the early Albian of the Dorset area,and later Albian of the Devon and London Platform basin margin areas: its onset can be linked to the Austrian tectonic phase of Europe. The onset of marine deposition in the Aptian is coincident with periodic transgression of the margins of the Wessex Basin throughout the Aptian-Albian. Mid-late Aptian and early/mid-Albian transgressions were preceded by periods of erosion. The Aptian-Albian Lower Greensand is characterized by transgressive- regressive phases, suggesting a short-term controlling process (third-order eustatic changes or intra-plate mechanisms). Tectonic changes in the mid-Aptian include uplift followed by widespread subsidence. This change coincides with a time of plate reorganization in the European and North Atlantic areas. The Mesozoic Wessex Basin of southern England is a structur- (Drummond 1970; Stoneley 1982). Thus structures such as the ally complexbasin (Whittaker 1985), where a predominant ‘mid-Dorset Swell’ (Drummond 1970, 1982) may also be re- east-west pattern of extensional faults is cut by a seriesof lated to basement faults.
    [Show full text]