Nohow-On-Samuel-Beckett.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nohow-On-Samuel-Beckett.Pdf z E­ E- 0 w :::: ~ ~ :::: ~ ­-f. U = C; :::: .....l W -/. --' 0:: ~ ~ ~ c:o "- ~ ~ :;;" L ~ :::: - ,- 0 ...J ­ -r. Z W - :r. 0::: :::: - ~ ~ --' ~ C --' ...., ~ 0 ~ Z CfJ _.~- "~ ~"'-",""",---,._~ "... o '"0 tTl >­ Z ..., ::t -. Z ~ ~ m g. ~ ~----.- NV3dOlln3 AlIV Nohow On puhlished in or", volt"ne in 1'J!l9 hy John Calder (Puhlishers) Ltd, 18 Brewer Street, London WlR 4AS. © Samuel Ikekett 1989 Company firsl puhlished in 1980 by John Cald"r (Publislwrs) Ltd. 1/1 Scm 1/1 Said first puhlished by Editions de Minuit. Paris. as Ma/oll Ma/ dit illl'J81 and in the author's translation in 1982 by John Calder (Publishers) Ltd. Ukslward 110 NOHOW ON first puhlished in 198:) by John Cahkr (Puhlislwrs) Ltd. © Samuellkckett 1980, 1981, 1982, 198:). 19B9 ALL RICHTS RESERVED BRITISII L1BHARY CATALOClflNC I'" PLBLlC\TION Beckctt, Samuel Nohow On I. Titl.. II. Beekctt. Samud' «''''/HUI}' III. Beck..tt. Samud [Ma/oll Ma/ dit] 1/1 Sern 1/1 Said IV. Beckett. Samu..1 U"(Jrslward 110 82:l-'J12 [F] PR60o:l . E 282 ,n~OlB!p ISBN 0 71i.'i ..111 7 (hardcover) ISBN 0 71i:, ..112.'i (papcrhack 1991) AllY f"'f",rhaek ..ditioll of Ihis b,.,k whelher publisl...d sillll"lallcolls,," widl. or suhs('qllt'nt to, the cased edition i~ sold slIhjl'('( to III(' conditioll dlat it shall 1101. h~' way of trad... I... I..nl. n'sol,L hin'd out. or olherwise disposed o[ wiil "'"I iI ... puhlislll'rs' ('Olls('n" ill any form or hinding otlJ('r thall that ill which it is fin;l puhlislu·d. No part or lhis puhlicatioll lIIay hI' rqHudu('('d. ston·d ill <I l'C'tri('v .. lI sysh'ltl. or trallsllIiUt"d ill allY form hy allY IlwaJl:-'. e!l·('/rolli('. photo('opying. lII('chanical or ollH'rwi:-w. except hrit{ ('xtl'act:-, for the purpos('s of revie\\", ",!rhollt t!lt' prior wnttl'lI p~'nllissioll or lilt' copyright oWIH'r and puhlislwr. Typt'sl"! al (;olp;ollooza I..cllt'rl'oliltdry ill EII~lish rvlollolypt' Bodolli :r>: willI Ill'W d('s('eJldiJlp; t'harac1I'J'!'\ fl'OlII puuclws cut hy Dallit" Carr awl Ballt'l' Budon! l3 displa\. Prillt"d ill (;..""1 Brilaill hv Call1l'lot Pre',s pie-. Sllllha'"ll!lll. 3Zf13 13U, s<J[[!B o u J} [j '-' 'I Z ....., fI""" tTl r ~ '"CI 0 Z m :::0 >­ :::0 ~ --< ~. m c:: tTl ~ ~ ".1 3 AlIVlIOdW3lNl A voice comes to one in the dark. Imagine. G To one on his back in the dark. This he can tell by the pressure on his hind parts and b) how the dark changes when he shuts his e:es and again when he opens them again. Only a small part of what is said can be verified. As for example when he hears, You are on your back in the dark. Then he must acknowledge the truth of what is said. But by far the greater part of what is said cannot be verified. As for example when CIP he hears, You first saw the light on such and such a da:. Sometimes the two are combined as for example, You first saw the light on such and such a clav and now c, . :ou are on :~our back in the dark. A device perhaps from the incontrovertibilitv of the one to win credence for the other. That then is the proposition. To one on his hack in the dark a voice tells of a past. With occa­ sional allusion to a present and more rareh to a future L3N1 as for example, You will end as vou now are. And in 5 7n313u ~ S9[[!B '~n:I A ~V~OdW:I another dark or in the same another devising it all for L to kindle in his mind this faint uncertainty and embar' compan:'. Quick leave him. rassment. Use of the second person marks the voice. That of Your mind never active at any time is now even less the third that cankerous other. Could he speak to and than ever so. This is the t:'pe of assertion he does not of whom the voice speaks there would be a first. But question. You saw the light on such and such ada: he cannot. He shall not. You cannot. You shall not. and your mind never active at any time is now even less than ever so. Yet a certain activity of mind howev­ Apart from the voice and the faint sound of his er slight is a necessar: complement of compan:-. That breath there is no sound. None at least that he can is wh\- the voice does not say, You are on \our back in . " hear. This he can tell bv the faint sound of his breath. the dark and have no mental activity of any kind. The voice alone is compmw but not enough. Its effect on Though now even less than ever given to wonder he the hearer is a necessar:- complement. \Vere it onl: to ~B!P cannot but sometimes wonder if it is indeed to and of kindle in his mind the state of faint uncertainty and him the voice is speaking. Ma:' not there be another embarrassment mentioned above. But compan: apart with him in the dark to and of whom the voice is this effect is clearly necessan-. For were he mereh- to speaking? Is he not perhaps overhearing a communi, hear the voice and it to have no more effect on him cation not intended for him? If he is alone on his back than speech in Bantu or in Erse then might it not as in the dark why does the voice not sav so? Wh\, does well cease? Unless its object be b\- mere sound to it never sa:' for example, You saw the light on such plague one in need of silence. Or of course unless as and such a day and now yOU are alone on \'our back above surmised directed at another. ~~N1 in the dark? Why? Perhaps for no other reason than 6 --, :n~13u S2lUB l!!'Sl:iIti.............,.ms~~;_·,"'-,~_, ===~9'-=~-----~- 3)1NIHl NV3dO~ .I.!lUO~ A small boy you come out of Connollv's Stores To another of that other or of him or of another still. ~. holding :-our mother b: the hand. You turn right and To one on his back in the dark in anv case. Of one on ~ advance in silence southward along the high\\-ay-. After his back in the dark whether the same or another. So some hundred paces Hll! head inland and broach the with what reason remains he reasons and reasons ill. long steep homeward. You make ground in silence For were the voice speaking not to him but to another hand in hand through the warm still summer air. It is then it must be of that other it is speaking and not of late afternoon and after some hundred paces the sun him or of another still. Since it speaks in the second appears above the crest of the rise. Looking up at the person. Were it not of him to whom it is speaking blue sky and then at vour mother's face vou break the speaking but of another it would not speak in the silence asking her if it is not in realih much more second person but in the third. For example, He first distant than it app(~ars. The sky that is. The blue sk:. saw the light on such and such a da:- and now he is on Receiving no ans\\-er :-ou mentally reframe your (IUCS­ his back in the dark. It is clear therefore that if it is I Sdn~o tion and some hundred paces later look l! p at her face not to him the voice is speaking but to another it is again and ask her if it does not appear much less dis­ not of him either but of that other and none other to tant than in reality it is. For some reason vou could that other. So with what reason remains he reasons ill. never fathom this (Iuestion must have angered her In order to be compan:- he must display a certain exceedinglY. For she shook ofT \our little hand and mental activity. But it need not be of a high order. L • made YOl! a cutting retort YOl! hav(~ never forgotten. Indeed it might be argued the lower the better. Up to a ,_ L point. The lower the order of mental activity the better If tIlt' voic(' is not speaking to him it must be speak­ the company. Up to a point. ing to another. So with what reason remains he reasons. L To another of that other. Or of him. Or of another still. You first saw the light in the room you most likely ~ 8 9 3~.l .l~ ~ .1 '--I. Sd[[!B l NV3dOtln3 Atl' were conceived in. The big bow window looked west hastened to the coachhouse sOllie twent\ 'lards distant to the mountains. Mainly west. For being bow it looked . L where he housed his De Dion Bouton. He shut the also a little south and a little north. Necessarily. :\. doors behind him and climbed into the driver's seat. little south to more mountain and a little north to foot­ You ma\ imagine his thoughts as he sat there in the • L L hill and plain. The midwife was none other than a dark not knowing what to think. Though footsore and Dr.
Recommended publications
  • This Item Is the Archived Peer-Reviewed Author-Version Of
    This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of: Periodizing Samuel Beckett's Works A Stylochronometric Approach Reference: Van Hulle Dirk, Kestemont Mike.- Periodizing Samuel Beckett's Works A Stylochronometric Approach Style - ISSN 0039-4238 - 50:2(2016), p. 172-202 Full text (Publisher's DOI): https://doi.org/10.1353/STY.2016.0003 To cite this reference: http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1382770151162165141 Institutional repository IRUA This is the author’s version of an article published by the Pennsylvania State University Press in the journal Style 50.2 (2016), pp. 172-202. Please refer to the published version for correct citation and content. For more information, see http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.50.2.0172?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. <CT>Periodizing Samuel Beckett’s Works: A Stylochronometric Approach1 <CA>Dirk van Hulle and Mike Kestemont <AFF>UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP <abs>ABSTRACT: We report the first analysis of Samuel Beckett’s prose writings using stylometry, or the quantitative study of writing style, focusing on grammatical function words, a linguistic category that has seldom been studied before in Beckett studies. To these function words, we apply methods from computational stylometry and model the stylistic evolution in Beckett’s oeuvre. Our analyses reveal a number of discoveries that shed new light on existing periodizations in the secondary literature, which commonly distinguish an “early,” “middle,” and “late” period in Beckett’s oeuvre. We analyze Beckett’s prose writings in both English and French, demonstrating notable symmetries and asymmetries between both languages. The analyses nuance the traditional three-part periodization as they show the possibility of stylistic relapses (disturbing the linearity of most periodizations) as well as different turning points depending on the language of the corpus, suggesting that Beckett’s English oeuvre is not identical to his French oeuvre in terms of patterns of stylistic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett
    Introduction Beckett and nothing: trying to understand Beckett Daniela Caselli Best worse no farther. Nohow less. Nohow worse. Nohow naught. Nohow on. Said nohow on. (Samuel Beckett, Worstward Ho) In unending ending or beginning light. Bedrock underfoot. So no sign of remains a sign that none before. No one ever before so – (Samuel Beckett, The Way)1 What not On 21 April 1958 Samuel Beckett writes to Thomas MacGreevy about having written a short stage dialogue to accompany the London production of Endgame.2 A fragment of a dramatic dia- logue, paradoxically entitled Last Soliloquy, has been identifi ed as being the play in question.3 However, John Pilling, in more recent research on the chronology, is inclined to date Last Soliloquy as post-Worstward Ho and pre-What Is the Word, on the basis of a letter sent by Phyllis Carey to Beckett on 3 February 1986, on the reverse of which we fi nd jottings referring to the title First Last Words with material towards Last Soliloquy.4 If we accept this new dating hypothesis, the manuscripts of this text (UoR MS 2937/1–3) – placed between two late works often associated with nothing – indicate two speakers, P and A (tentatively seen by Ruby Cohn as Protagonist and Antagonist) and two ways in which they can deliver their lines, D for declaim and A (somewhat confusingly) for normal.5 Unlike Cohn, I read A and P as standing for ‘actor’ and ‘prompter’, thus explaining why the text is otherwise puzzlingly entitled a soliloquy and supporting her hypothesis that the lines Daniela Caselli - 9781526146458 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 09/25/2021 06:16:53AM via free access 2 Beckett and nothing ‘Fuck the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Beckett and Philosophy
    D ERMOT M ORAN beckett and philosophy ‘We always find something, eh Didi, to give us the impression that we exist’ Waiting for Godot ‘Mean something! You and I, mean something! [Brief laugh.] Ah, that’s a good one’ Endgame ‘All life long the same questions, the same answers’ Endgame1 amuel Barclay Beckett (1906–89) is the most philosophical of twentieth-century writers. As we hear Sfrom Hamm in Endgame:‘I love the old questions. [With fervour.] Ah the old questions, the old answers, there’s nothing like them!’ (110). Beckett’s writings contain a kind of arbitrary collection or bricolage of philosophical ideas. His characters exult in endless, pointless, yet entertaining, metaphysical arguments. His work exudes an atmosphere of existential Angst, hopelessness and human abandonment to the relentless course of the world. Beckett’s characters portray a rootless, homeless, alienated humanity. One no longer at home in the world; one lost in a meaningless void. Every play and prose piece reinforces and deepens this dark diagnosis of the human condition, generating an overarching world view that has justifiably been called ‘Beckettian’ (akin to the ‘Pinteresque’ 93 SAMUEL BECKETT 100 years world of Pinter). His 1981 piece Ill Seen Ill Said sums up this world as: Void. Nothing else. Contemplate that. Not another word. Home at last. Gently gently. Modern humanity is at home in its homelessness. This stark Beckettian world cries out for philosophical interpretation. Indeed in his plays are embedded vague hints and suggestions of deliberate philosophical intent. The out- wardly pessimistic atmosphere, the bleak post-apocalyptic landscapes, hopeless characters and the overwhelming sense of the aimlessness and meaninglessness of life, the ‘issueless pre- dicament of existence’2 as Beckett himself put it, has led many critics to try to pin down the overall philosophical position to which Beckett supposedly subscribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Miranda, 4 | 2011 Eleutheria―Notes on Freedom Between Offstage and Self-Reference 2
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 4 | 2011 Samuel Beckett : Drama as philosophical endgame ? Eleutheria―Notes on Freedom between Offstage and Self-reference Shimon Levy Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/2019 DOI: 10.4000/miranda.2019 ISSN: 2108-6559 Publisher Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Electronic reference Shimon Levy, “Eleutheria―Notes on Freedom between Offstage and Self-reference”, Miranda [Online], 4 | 2011, Online since 24 June 2011, connection on 16 February 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/miranda/2019 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.2019 This text was automatically generated on 16 February 2021. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Eleutheria―Notes on Freedom between Offstage and Self-reference 1 Eleutheria―Notes on Freedom between Offstage and Self-reference Shimon Levy 1 Samuel Beckett’s works have long and profoundly been massaged by numerous philosophical and semi-philosophical views, methods and “isms”, ranging from Descartes, Geulincx and Malebranche to existentialism à la Sartre and Camus, to logical positivism following Frege, Wittgenstein and others―to name but a few. P. J. Murphy rightly maintains that “the whole question of Beckett’s relationship to the philosophers is pretty obviously in need of a major critical assessment”.1 In many, if not most studies, “a philosophy” has been superimposed on the
    [Show full text]
  • Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett's Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby
    This is a repository copy of Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/129513/ Version: Published Version Article: Piette, A.C. (2014) Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett’s Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 22. pp. 81-90. ISSN 2386-3935 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ending the Mother Ghost: Beckett's Ill Seen Ill Said and Rockaby Adam PIETTE University of Sheffield, UK School of English [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper looks at two late texts written in 1981 by Samuel Beckett, the novel Ill Seen Ill Said and the play Rockaby, and reads them as difficult Oedipal elegies for his mother May Beckett who had died thirty years previously. The close reading of the texts brings out the conflicted psychoanalytic contradictions of the representations, especially the son’s strange identification with the mother brought on by the fact Beckett was himself approaching his mother’s age when she died.
    [Show full text]
  • Posthuman Beckett English 9169B Winter 2019 the Course Analyzes the Short Prose That Samuel Beckett Produced Prior to and After
    Posthuman Beckett English 9169B Winter 2019 The course analyzes the short prose that Samuel Beckett produced prior to and after his monumental The Unnamable (1953), a text that initiated Beckett’s deconstruction of the human subject: The Unnamable is narrated by a subject without a fully-realized body, who inhabits no identifiable space or time, who is, perhaps, dead. In his short prose Beckett continues his exploration of the idea of the posthuman subject: the subject who is beyond the category of the human (the human understood as embodied, as historically and spatially located, as possessing some degree of subjective continuity). What we find in the short prose (our analysis begins with three stories Beckett produced in 1945-6: “The Expelled,” “The Calmative,” “The End”) is Beckett’s sustained fascination with the idea of the possibility of being beyond the human: we will encounter characters who can claim to be dead (“The Calmative,” Texts for Nothing [1950-52]); who inhabit uncanny, perhaps even post-apocalyptic spaces (“All Strange Away” [1963-64], “Imagination Dead Imagine” [1965], Lessness [1969], Fizzles [1973-75]); who are unaccountably trapped in what appears to be some kind of afterlife (“The Lost Ones” [1966; 1970]); who, in fact, may even defy even the philosophical category of the posthuman (Ill Seen Ill Said [1981], Worstward Ho [1983]). And yet despite the radical dismantling of the idea or the human, as such, the being that emerges in these texts is still, perhaps even insistently, spatially, geographically, even ecologically, located. This course which finds its philosophical inspiration in the work of Martin Heidegger, especially his critical analysis of the relation between being and world, and attempts to come to some understanding of what it means for the posthuman to be in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapture and Typos in Dante and Beckett
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE DARK PARADISE: RAPTURE AND TYPOS IN DANTE AND BECKETT A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Art in Theatre By Robert Lynn Newton December 2012 The thesis of Robert Lynn Newton is approved: __________________________________ __________________ Dr. Ron Popenhagen Date __________________________________ __________________ Dr. Dorothy G. Clark Date __________________________________ __________________ Dr. Ah-Jeong Kim, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii For Janet Pearson What thoughts, who knows. Thoughts, no, not thoughts. Profounds of mind. Buried in who knows what profounds of mind. Of mindlessness. Whither no light can reach. Samuel Beckett iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ii Dedication iii Abstract v Introduction 1 Chapter One 5 Belacqua Real and Imagined Chapter Two 23 Rapture: The Balcony of the Soul Chapter Three 39 Typos: The Footprint of the Creator Chapter Four 56 Rapture II: The Treacherous Moon Chapter Five 70 Dark Paradise Works Cited 82 Works Consulted 85 iv ABSTRACT DARK PARADISE: RAPTURE AND TYPOS IN DANTE AND BECKETT By Robert Lynn Newton Master of Arts in Theatre The intertextuality of Dante and Beckett is examined through the use of dramatic contrasts of light and dark. Rapture represents sentient light, derived from Dante’s study of Aristotle, Ptolemy, and Avicenna. Its opposite Typos is a material form that cancels the light, casts a shadow, or leaves a signature of the creator on the face of creation. Characters in Beckett’s Happy Days, and the stories “Ding-Dong” and “Dante and the Lobster” present manifestations of Dante’s Beatrice figure centered in the attributes of facial expressions as a sign of Rapture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Samuel Beckett's Short Prose Fiction
    Samuel Beckett, 1969, Ink on board , as represented by cartoonist Edmund Valtman. From Storms of Sound to Missing Words: The Story of Samuel Beckett’s Short prose Fiction María José Carrera de la Red UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID A chronological ove r v i ew of Samuel Becke t t ’s short prose fiction may seem an unlikely choice as a celebration of the life and work of the author of seminal texts in the history of 20t h- c e n t u r y literature like Waiting for Godot or The Unnamable. But it takes the reading of these lesser- k n ow n t exts to fully understand what the whole Beckettian project is about. If Beckett referred to his prose fiction as “the important writing” —signifi c a n t l y, prose was the only genre, with poetry, that he practised from the beginning to the very end of his career— his short prose texts in particular can be said to delineate the story of his creative evolution providing, by virtue of their concentrated nature, magnificent introductions to his varying artistic intentions and writing methods. As might be expected with an author like Beckett, some of these texts are so innova t ive or experimental that even terminology fails. Certainly it is hard to call them fi c t i o n, or s t o r i e s, but eve n the word p ro s e is ill-fitting to describe some of Becke t t ’s more concentrated attempts, one of which was about to be included in a poetry collection when Beckett claimed that it was prose not ve r s e .
    [Show full text]
  • BECKETT and the QUEST for MEANING Martin Esslin The
    BECKETT AND THE QUEST FOR MEANING Martin Esslin The twentieth century has been a turbulent and unhappy age, dominated by fanaticisms, ideologies that proclaimed themselves as infallibly based on would-be scientific truths about race or class, and in consequence a period of unprecedented violence and cruelty. In those distant days, in nineteen-thirties Vienna, when as a school­ boy I joined an underground Communist cell and was, in hidden clear­ ings in the woods on summer Sundays, indoctrinated in the principles of Marxism, I learned that this system of thought had now become a scien­ tific truth beyond doubt, and that therefore anyone who wanted to pursue policies that contradicted it had to be liquidated for the general good. (It was the period of the great Moscow trials.) At the same time, some of my friends at school who belonged to the equally illegal and underground Hitler youth assured me that inferior races like the Jews had been scien­ tifically established as being so noxious to the future health of humanity that it was an urgent necessity to kill them all, not realizing that I, their friend, was included in this verdict. Those totalitarian creeds are now in disrepute, but the world is still threatened by violent fanaticisms and fundamentalisms of numerous varieties: the vacuum created by the decline of traditional religious be­ liefs in the nineteenth century, still far from having been filled, has grown ever wider as it has become less and less possible to accept the literal truth of events like the Resurrection. Those who still cling to them revert to the primitivism of fundamentalist cults; most others are left with an equally primitive, stultifying and barren materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy
    Collected Shorter Plays Works by Samuel Beckett published by Grove Press Cas cando Mercier and Camier Collected Poems in Molloy English and French More Pricks Than Kicks The Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett Murphy Company Nohow On (Company, Seen Disjecta Said, Worstward Ho) Endgame Ill Ohio Impromptu Ends and Odds Ill Proust First Love and Other Stories Rockaby Happy Days Stories and Texts How It Is for Nothing I Can't Go On, I'll Go On Three Novels Krapp Last Tape Waiting for Godot The Lost Ones Watt s Malone Dies Worstward Ho Happy Days: Samuel Beckett's Production Notebooks, edited by James Knowlson Samuel Beckett: The Complete Short Prose, 1929-/989, edited and with an introduction and notes by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Endgame, edited by S. E. Gontarski The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Krapp's Last Tape, edited by James Knowlson The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Waiting for Godot, edited by Dougald McMillan and James Knowlson COLLECTED SHORTER PLAYS SAMUEL BECKETT Grove Press New York Copyright© 1984 by Samuel Beckett All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, by any means, including mechanical, electronic, photocopying,recording, or otherwise,without prior written permission of the publisher. Grove Press 841 Broadway New York, NY 10003 All That Fall © Samuel Beckett, 1957; Act Without Words I © Samuel Beckett, 1959; Act Without Words II© Samuel Beckett,1959; Krapp's Last 'Ihpe© Samuel Beckett,1958; Rough for Theatre I © Samuel Beckett, 1976; Rough for Theatre II© Samuel Beckett,1976; Embers © Samuel Beckett,1959; Rough for Radio I© Samuel Beckett,1976; Rough forRadio II© Samuel Beckett, 1976; Words and Music © Samuel Beckett,1962; Cascando© Samuel Beckett, 1963; Play © Samuel Beckett, 1963; Film © Samuel Beckett, 1967; The Old Tune, adapt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ill Seen Ill Said Presented By: Amber Fujita, Amanda Garcia, Lianne Mcneal, and Amirissa Mina Samuel Barclay Beckett: Early Life
    Ill Seen Ill Said Presented by: Amber Fujita, Amanda Garcia, Lianne McNeal, and Amirissa Mina Samuel Barclay Beckett: Early Life Day of Birth: Arguably born on Good Friday. April 13, 1906. Beckett was raised in the middle class as a Protestant. Attended Portora Royal School Attended Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland from 1923‐27. Earned a Master’s degree in 1931. Beckett studied French and Italian literature. Beckett studied the French author Racine, Italian Dante, and German philosopher Schopenhauer. Beckett took a temporary teaching position in Paris, France at Ecole Normale Superieure. Beckett’s friend Thomas MacGreevy introduced him to James Joyce and Joyce’s circle of literary friends. Beckett helped Joyce work what would later be called “Finnegan’s Wake.” His admiration of Joyce heavily influenced his writings. Samuel Barclay Beckett: His Life Beckett returned to Ireland in 1930.He took a short‐lived teaching position at Trinity College. Beckett traveled to Germany. He returned to Ireland in 1932. The death of his father in the summer of 1933 left Beckett severely depressed. He went to London to receive psychotherapy from Dr. Wilfred Bion for two years. Beckett permanently settled in Paris in 1937. His first novel, Dream of Fair to Middling Women was rejected by publishers. Stabbed by a panhandler in Paris in 1936. At a hospital he meets an acquaintance Suzanne Deschevaux‐Dumesnil Samuel Barclay Beckett: His Life Continued Beckett joined the French resistance in 1940. Samuel Beckett’s mother died in August 25, 1950 after suffering from a long bout with Parkinson’s Disease. It is thought her struggle with the disease influenced the old woman in Ill Seen Ill Said.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Beckett and Europe
    Samuel Beckett and Europe Samuel Beckett and Europe: History, Culture, Tradition Edited by Michela Bariselli, Niamh M. Bowe and William Davies Samuel Beckett and Europe: History, Culture, Tradition Edited by Michela Bariselli, Niamh M. Bowe and William Davies This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Michela Bariselli, Niamh M. Bowe, William Davies and contributors and The Estate of Samuel Beckett Excerpts from manuscripts of Samuel Becketts Fin de partie reproduced by kind permission of the Estate of Samuel Beckett c/o Rosica Colin Limited, London. All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9630-6 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9630-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................... vii Chapter One ................................................................................................. 1 Introduction: Samuel Beckett and the Question of ‘Europe’ William Davies Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 15 “The following precious and illuminating material should
    [Show full text]