DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Priorities Committee SMART Plan Financial Report, July 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fiscal Priorities Committee SMART Plan Financial Report, July 2020 Fiscal Priorities Committee SMART Plan Financial Report Executive Summary The 2020 Fiscal Year (State Fiscal Year July 2019 through June 2020) has been a year of action and progress for the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) on the SMART Plan. North Corridor October 2019 – Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for North Corridor updated based on further analysis by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) – adopted by TPO. April 2020 – Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) presented updates on technology options for North Corridor that are accepted by the TPO Board. Subsequently, the County issued a procurement process for the North Corridor that should receive proposals in 2021. Beach Corridor January 2020 – Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative for Beach Corridor presented by DTPW – adopted by the TPO. County received one proposal in March 2020 for the Trunkline of the Beach Corridor that is under evaluation as of June 2020. East-West Corridor April 2020 – Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative for East-West Corridor presented by DTPW – TPO requested additional follow up analysis by DTPW. Fiscal Priorities Committee The SMART Finance Plan has incorporated all of these changes into the model. Model updates are provided periodically to the Fiscal Priorities Committee to assist in evaluating the SMART Plan corridors for financial feasibility. On July 10, 2020 the Fiscal Priorities Committee and other partners as appropriate to update and called a special meeting to conduct a SMART Plan validate the assumptions. financial discussion. The PowerPoint presentation for this discussion is included in the appendix of Major finance plan updates were completed this this report. The report that follows documents the fiscal year as described in Chapter 5. These Fiscal Priorities Committee discussions during included: Carry over from the 2018-19 period Fiscal Year 2019-20 including the committee added to revenues; Updated Miami-Dade County meeting on July 10, 2020. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Forecast; Revised North Corridor Costs; Beach The key assumptions for the Finance Plan for the Corridor LPA; North Corridor DTPW Alternatives SMART Plan are outlined in Chapters 2 (SMART and Preliminary East-West Corridor options; and Plan Funding Allocation and Assumptions), 4 Fiscal Priorities Committee requested an updated (SMART Plan Corridors Presented to TPO and on the funding for all corridors. Under Analysis) and 5 (Finance Plan Updates During Fiscal Year 2019-20). The combined TPO and Consultant Team partner on discussing all the major assumptions and gain input from the County I Based on the data and assumptions outlined in this report, it is feasible to deliver the SMART Plan as presented. This includes the following SMART Plan corridors: South Corridor – Bus Rapid Transit for South Transitway North Corridor – Elevated Rubber Tire Rapid Transit along 27 Avenue Beach Corridor – Elevated Rubber Tire Transit for the Trunkline from downtown to Miami Beach along MacArthur Causeway East-West Corridor – Bus Rapid Transit for the western segment: Tamiami Station to the Turnpike to SR-836 to downtown and Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Kendall Corridor – Bus Rapid Transit east and west of Florida’s Turnpike along Kendall Drive These results are based on the current assumptions and revenues. Changes can and will occur on a periodic basis related to funding, costs, schedules, and related major assumptions. For example, the Finance Plan could experience challenges such as: Local funding allocated for the SMART Plan is reduced due to impacts of COVID-19 which is likely to occur. The amounts are not yet known as the pandemic remains active as of June 2020. Partnership funding from the Federal or state governments are less than anticipated. Cost of the corridors are higher than currently estimated for one or more corridors. Please note the Finance Plan assumes an extra 15% contingency for capital costs and 12.5% for operating costs. The addition of the Northeast Corridor at the levels proposed by Brightline would exceed the available remaining funding in the Finance Plan. Advancing corridors to much earlier beginning dates would be cost prohibitive. Finance cost to advance capital costs become cost prohibitive or unavailable. The TPO staff and Consultant Team will continually update the Finance Plan for the SMART Plan as new data and assumptions are provided for timely decision-making by the TPO and its partners. II Table of Contents 01 02 03 04 Introduction SMART Plan Project SMART Plan (p.1) Funding Delivery (p.8) Corridors Allocation and Presented to Assumptions TPO and Under (p.5) Analysis (p.14) 05 06 07 Finance Plan Fiscal Year Appendix: Updates During 2019-20 Fiscal Priorities Fiscal Year Summary (p.25) Committee July 10, 2019-20 (p.21) 2020 PowerPoint June 2020 SMART GPC Work Order 19 Presentation 01 Introduction 01 Introduction In 2002, Miami-Dade County voters approved a TPO Governing Board officially adopted and one-half percent local surtax with the purpose endorsed the proposed Strategic Miami Area of improving, among other things, rapid transit Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan. corridors within the county through the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP). While the PTP is a The SMART Plan intends to advance six of the locally funded initiative administered by the Citizens PTP’s rapid transit corridors, along with a network Independent Transportation Trust (CITT), the system of Bus Express Rapid Transit (BERT) Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization service, in order to implement mass transit projects (TPO) remains committed to assisting in the in Miami-Dade County. To ensure the SMART Plan development of these rapid transit corridors today. moves forward, the TPO Governing Board directed the Miami-Dade TPO Executive Director to work In fact, on February 16, 2016, the TPO Governing with the TPO Fiscal Priorities Committee (FPC) Board unanimously approved a policy to set as to determine the costs and potential sources of “highest priority” the advancement of rapid transit funding for Project Development and Environment corridors and transit supportive projects for the (PD&E) studies for the projects, and to also take county. Then, on April 21, 2016, the Miami-Dade all necessary steps to implement the SMART Plan. TWO MAJOR ACTIVITIES MOVING THE SMART PLAN FORWARD To ensure the community is included in the planning and visioning process to select the best technology and highest, best land uses along each corridor, there are two separate major activities occurring for each corridor as follows: Land Use Project Scenario & Development Visioning and Environment Planning (PD&E) Studies Headed by the Headed by the Miami- Miami-Dade TPO Dade County Department of Transportation & Public Works (DTPW) and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six 1 1 817 MIRAMAR PKWY 95 R E D R O A D NW 215 ST Aventura 75 Miami NW 205 ST R Gardens NW 199 S T FLORIDA‘S TURNPIKE NW 192 ST DO NW 186 S T I NW 186 S T MIAMI GARDENS DR NW 183 S T N W 8 7 A V E TOLL NW 167 ST BLVD 821 826 ES PALMETTO EXPY SUNNY ISL c Miami Lakes N E 6 A V E GRA E HWY TIGN TH CORR NW 138 S Y E OKEECHOBEE RD T 924 XPY DIXI NW 135 ST W A1A NEW SERVICE OPENINGS, R W 68 ST BROAD CSWY 96 ST 27 E 65 ST NO 4 1 C OLLINS AVE N W 5 7 A V E 95 N W 4 2 A V E N W 3 2 A V E N W 2 2 A V E N W 2 7 NA W V E 1 7 A V E CONSTRUCTION DATES, & NW 106 ST P A L M A V E W 49 ST TS 301 WN N W 6 7 A V E BISCAYNE BLVD PROJECT MILESTONES f1 71 ST NORTHEAST CORRIDOR NW 79 ST NW 74 ST JOHN F. KENNEDY CSWY N W 3 7 A V E 5 The SMART Plan N W e21 0 7 A V E NW 58 ST Miami Beach Existing Metrorail TOLL JULIA TUTTLE CSWY DORAL BLVD 112 1f Existing Tri-Rail NW 36 ST Doral N W 1 2 A V E 195 2f NW 25 ST f2 Existing Rail W ASHINGTON AVE A L T O N R O A D MIC Miami Intermodal Center MIC TOLL EAST-WEST CORRIDOR VENETIAN CSWY 395 SMART/BERT Hub 2 836 NW 7 ST 1 f3 W FLAGLER ST a SW 8 ST Downtown TAMIAMI TRAIL a SW 8 ST Rapid Transit Corridors: S W S2 2 W S A1 W 7 V E A1 2 V E A V E BEACH CORRIDOR (In alphabetical order) FIU S WS 7 W 2 6A 7S VA E W V 5 E 7 AS V W E S4 2 WSA 3 V W 7 E 2A 7 V A E V E TOLL SW 24 ST 1 Beach Corridor CORAL WAY 821 RICKENBACKER CSWY Coral 2 East-West Corridor e1 SW 40 ST BIRD RD Gables 3 Kendall Corridor SW 56 ST MILLER DR SW 56 ST S W 1S 8 7 W A 1 V 7 E 7 A V E S W 1 1 7 A V E S WS 1 W 6 71 6A 2 V A E V E S W 1 5 7 A V E S W 1 2 7 A V E S W 1 0 7 A V E 4 North Corridor S W 1 3 7 A V E 5 Northeast Corridor SW 72 ST SUNSET DR SW 72 ST TOLL 6 South Dade Transitway 878 b d KENDALL DR SW 88 ST 3 S W 8 7 A V E Bus Express Rapid KENDALL CORRIDOMILAR M D AIRY RD R E D R D Transit (BERT) SW 104 ST d L U D L A M R D Corridors b SW 112 ST TOLL a Flagler Corridor SW 120 ST d 874 E OLD CUTLER RD K I Pinecrest b P S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jitney Approach for Miami-Dade County, the Publicos System: A
    Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Prepared by the Metropolitan Planning Organization March 2002 A JITNEY APPROACH FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Tale of Two Areas: San Juan Metropolitan Area (SJMA).……………………………………….. 2 Miami Urbanized Area………………………………………………………….. 3 Trip Schedule………………………………..………………………………….. 3 PRESENTATIONS……………………………………………………………………….. 4 Department of Transportation (PRDOT)…………………………………….. 4 Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA)………………………….. 6 Metropolitan Bus Authority (MBA)…….…………………………………….. 8 Public Service Commission (PSC)…………………….…………………….. 9 FIELD TRIPS…….………………………………………………………………………..11 Visiting “Publicos” Facilities…………………………………………………..11 Rio Piedras Terminal………………………………………………………….. 11 Bayamon Terminal…………………………………………………………….. 12 Cataño Terminal………………………………………….…………………….. 13 “Tren Urbano”…………………………………………….…………………….. 14 HIGHLIGHTS…..…………………………………………………………………………..15 OBSERVATIONS…..…………………………………………………………………….. 16 RECOMMENDATIONS.…………………………………………………………………..18 LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………..….……………………………..19 “A”: “Publicos” Study - Scope of Work “B”: Trip Agenda “C”: List of Participants “D”: Publicos’ Presentation - PRDOT 3 BACKGROUND On January 28, 2002, the MPO Governing Board Puerto Rico’s fixed-route, semi-scheduled owner- under Resolution # 10-02 authorized a trip to San operated and demand responsive “publico” passenger Juan, Puerto Rico, for the MPO Board Members and transportation system is unique within the territorial staff
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Products
    TRANSIT PRODUCTS ™ YOUR TOTAL TRACK MANAGEMENT COMPANY ® CXT® Concrete Ties lbfoster.com L.B. FOSTER TRANSIT PRODUCTS L.B. Foster provides transit solutions that can be customized to meet your specific requirements and schedule. Our products and services are in use worldwide in heavy rail and light rail transit systems. We offer direct fixation fastener and contact rail systems. Our bonded and non- bonded fasteners provide the best balance for noise and vibration dampening, electrical isolation and ease of installation. L.B. Foster’s systems can be utilized in turnouts, crossings, expansion joints, restraining rails and many other applications. Our contact rail systems can include steel, aluminum or steel/aluminum clad rails and be offered as complete installation packages with insulators, coverboard systems, end approaches, anchors and other appurtenances. L.B. Foster provides embedded track systems for concrete, asphalt or grass applications. Our rail boot systems offer resilient solutions to protect track structure and provide electrical isolation and noise/vibration dampening. L.B. Foster has a protective boot to fit any rail section and the accessories to support your custom solution. Our full line of accessories includes steel or composite leveling beams, splice cuffs, rail clip systems, fabricated steel plates and miscellaneous installation material. L.B. Foster Engineering Expertise L.B. Foster can also be counted on to engineer and test custom solutions specific to your own unique requirements. Our innovative Transit Products R&D facility in Suwanee, GA is state-of-the-art rail products lab designed specifically for the transit market. The laboratory’s trained technicians can perform static, fatigue, electrical and environmental tests to simulate application conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Informe Final Evolución Del Plan Maestro Y Las Extensiones Al Tren Urbano
    Programa de Desarrollo Profesional UPR/PUPR/ATI División Grupo PUPR Informe Final Evolución del Plan Maestro y las Extensiones al Tren Urbano Mentores: Prof. Amado Vélez Gallego, M.S.C.E., P.E. [email protected] Prof. Felipe Luyanda Villafañe, Dr.Eng., P.E. [email protected] Gustavo E. Pacheco Crosetti, Ph. D., P.E. [email protected] Sometido por: Carlos J. Rodríguez Bury [email protected] Universidad Politécnica de Puerto Rico Ave. Ponce de León, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Ambiental 17 de mayo de 2008 Prefacio Esta investigación consiste en el estudio de la evolución del plan maestro del Tren Urbano (PMTU), desde sus comienzos en la década del 1960 hasta el presente y las extensiones del mismo hoy día. Se desarrollo una recopilación de información de los estudios previos seleccionados al plan maestro del tren urbano (TU) y sus extensiones, de manera de proveer una sola fuente en la cual la comunidad profesional y el gobierno puedan ver las diferentes ideas asociadas al TU en un solo documento. 2 Tabla de Contenido 1. Introducción .................................................................................. 4 1.1 Tema de Investigación ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Objetivo y Alcance ....................................................................................... 5 1.4 Metodología ................................................................................................. 6 2. Evolución del PMTU Década 1960-1969 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • On the Move... Miami-Dade County's Pocket
    Guide Cover 2013_English_Final.pdf 1 10/3/2013 11:24:14 AM 111 NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128 tel: (305) 375-4507 fax: (305) 347-4950 www.miamidade.gov/mpo C M On the Y CM MY Move... CY CMY K Miami-Dade County’s Pocket Guide to Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 4th Edition Table of Contents Highway Information Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) p. 1 FDOT’s Turnpike Enterprise p. 2 Florida Highway Patrol p. 2 95 Express Lanes p. 3 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) p. 4 SunPass® p. 5 511-SmarTraveler p. 5 Road Rangers p. 5 SunGuide® Transportation Management Center p. 6 Miami-Dade Public Works and Waste p. 7 Management Department Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) p. 8 Driving and Traffic Regulations p. 8 Three Steps for New Florida Residents p. 9 Drivers License: Know Before You Go p. 9 Vehicle Registration p. 10 Locations and Hours of Local DMV Offices p. 10-11 Transit Information Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) p. 12 Metrobus, Metrorail, Metromover p. 12 Fares p. 13 EASY Card p. 13 Discount EASY Cards p. 14-15 Obtaining EASY Card or EASY Ticket p. 15 Transfers p. 16-17 Park and Ride Lots p. 17-18 Limited Stop Route/Express Buses p. 18-19 Special Transportation Services (STS) p. 20 Special Event Shuttles p. 21 Tax-Free Transit Benefits p. 21 I Transit Information (Continued) South Florida Regional Transportation Authority p. 22 (SFRTA) / TriRail Amtrak p. 23 Greyhound p. 23 Fare & Schedule Information p. 24 Local Stations p.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Implementing a PR-181 Busway in the Trujillo Alto Area An
    Feasibility of Implementing a PR-181 Busway in the Trujillo Alto Area An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Submitted by John Benigno Eric Gebrian Kevin Reidy Michael Seabrook Submitted to Project Advisors Prof. J. Scott Jiusto Prof. Lauren Mathews Project Liaisons, Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacion Mr. Gabriel Rodríguez Fernández Mrs. Martha Bravo Colunga Date: May 5, 2005 [email protected] i Executive Summary The metropolitan region of San Juan, Puerto Rico is struggling with the integration of the mass transportation system and the surrounding municipalities. The problem facing San Juan is very complex, ranging from unsafe and inadequate pedestrian ways, to an under-developed mass transit system. These conditions lower the quality of life throughout the region, making it difficult for people to enjoy the area. The municipality of Trujillo Alto is one such area that is facing these problems. The implementation of a dedicated bus lane, or Busway, along the PR-181 corridor of Trujillo Alto is a possible starting point for an overall solution. The goal of this study is to identify issues relevant to the implementation of a Busway along the PR-181 corridor of Trujillo Alto and develop preliminary concepts for its design. Understanding potential issues that could arise with the construction of a Busway, is critical in the planning and design process. These issues impact the physical design of the system, modifications and/or reconstruction of roadways, price of the project, potential ridership, and overall time for completion of project.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Hyperdensity in Miami: Year 2100 Kenner N
    Policy Memorandum Tropical Dense[city]:Transit-Oriented Hyperdensity in Miami: Year 2100 Kenner N. Carmody, M.Des Energy & Environments 2019 Problem: This research aims to visualize and better understand future required housing stock necessary to accommodate displaced populations in Miami’s Allapattah neighborhood affected by sea level rise and resultant tidal inundation by the year 2100 (NOAA Office for Coastal Management). Property data, local geography and NOAA sea-level rise projections within this time-scale are used in order to propose greater density in Miami due to lost surface area. This study evaluates the existing spatial capacity and density distribution under current zoning policy, Miami 21. This study reveals that the current zoning code, overlay districts, and Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ) within the population catchment area of Allapattah are maladaptive. - The spatial analysis in this research assumes a residential occupancy of 1 person per 450 square feet (41.8m2), and floor to floor heights of 14’-0” (4.2m). - The criteria for this displacement assumes intracity relocation within Miami’s urban core, and excludes populations affected outside of the target study area of Allapattah. - This model assumes relocation within a population catchment area in Allapattah at elevations of 6’-0” above sea level and assumes density increases along Miami’s legacy Metrorail system. - This study excludes future population growth from the required future housing scenario. Figures Housing: - Total Population in Allapattah: 58,978 (2010 Census Data); 62,929 (2017 Estimate) - Total Housing Units: 22,255 - Unit Mix: Studio: 3% 1-Bedroom: 8%; 2-Bedroom: 35%; 3-Bedroom: 20%; 4-Bedroom: 17%; 5-Bedroom: 7%; 6-Bedroom: 4%; > 6% - The majority of housing stock in Allapattah predates 1975 and is poorly suited to its geography and climate.
    [Show full text]
  • ACI-HERZOG Tren Urbano Project
    ACI-HERZOG Tren Urbano Project Transit Asset Management Plan 2020 Department and Division: Issue Date: Engineering and Development Department May 27, 2020 Revision: Rev. 1, May/2020 Supersedes: Rev. 0 / 2017 ACI-HERZOG Approvals Prepared by: _______________________________ Revised by: _______________________________ Approved by: _______________________________ Approval Date: ______________________________ Date Recommended for release by QA/QC: ______________________________ ____________________ _____________ Print Name Signature Date Document Control List Transit Assets Management Plan Page 2 of 49 Rev. 1, May/2020 ACI-HERZOG Revision Date Description 0 January/2017 Initial Issuance Updates to plan and SOPs in accordance with the March 2018 TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook and the April 1 May/2020 2017 TAM Infrastructure Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook. List of Attachments Attachment Rev. No. Subject Appendix 1 1/2020 Asset Performance Targets (2019 NTD Narrative Report) 0/2018 Asset Condition Assessment Procedures: Appendix 2 PM-01-02 - NTD Performance Restriction (Slow Zone Calculation) 1/2020 PM-01-03 - NTD Facilities Condition Assessment Calculation Appendix 3 0/2017 Level of Service and Performance Measures Appendix 4 1/2020 Project Prioritization List Transit Assets Management Plan Page 3 of 49 Rev. 1, May/2020 ACI-HERZOG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Macton In-Ground Car Hoist Installations
    List of Macton In-Ground Car Hoist Installations Transit System Type of Hoist System Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Rosemount Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Howard Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Skokie C-Frame Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), Central Rail Operating Facility Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Denver Regional Trans. District (RTD), Mariposa Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands L.A. County Metropolitan Trans. Auth., Long Beach Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands L.A. County Metropolitan Trans. Auth., Hawthorn Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Long Island Rail Road, Hillside C-Frame Basement Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Long Island Rail Road, West Side Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, Wabash Deep Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, Wabash Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Maryland Transportation Authority, North Ave. Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Riverside Hydraulic Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Reservoir St. Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), Riverside Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metro-Dade Transportation Admin., Lehman Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, South Park Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, North White Plains Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metronorth Railroad, Stamford Deep Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), Avondale Deep Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB), El Cajon Shallow Pit Body Hoist New Jersey Transit, Hudson/Bergen Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Body Stands PATH - New Jersey, Harrison Shallow Pit Car Hoist with Portable Body Stands Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), St.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of the Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project
    AUDIT OF THE TREN URBANO RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT Federal Transit Administration Report Number: MH-2004-098 Date Issued: September 29, 2004 Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Office of Inspector General Subject: ACTION: Report on the Follow-Up Audit of the Date: September 29, 2004 Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project Federal Transit Administration MH-2004-098 From: Alexis M. Stefani Reply to Attn. of: JA-40 Principal Assistant Inspector General for Auditing and Evaluation To: Federal Transit Administrator This report presents the results of our third audit of the Tren Urbano Rail Transit Project (Tren Urbano) in San Juan, Puerto Rico. We are providing our findings and recommendations to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), so it may resolve the issues identified in this report before making further Federal funding decisions concerning Tren Urbano. Tren Urbano is being constructed by the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA). It is a 10.7-mile (17.2 km) fixed-guideway rail transit system that will serve existing and projected development within San Juan’s metropolitan area. Tren Urbano will include 16 stations, a vehicle maintenance and storage facility, 74 rail cars, operations control center, traction power, train control, and communications systems. The project is expected to provide a solution to the continually rising vehicle traffic levels and bring a new mode of transportation to the most congested sections of the San Juan metropolitan area. Since 1990, the number of registered vehicles in Puerto Rico has increased at an average annual rate of 2.89 percent; this is 2.13 percent more than the population growth rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Grounds Maintenance for Metrorail, Metromover, Metrobus, Busway, Facilities, Stations and Right of Way
    Attachment 8F14 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FOR METRORAIL, METROMOVER, METROBUS, BUSWAY, FACILITIES, STATIONS AND RIGHT OF WAY DATE LOCATION 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Palmetto Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Okeechobee Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Hialeah Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Northside Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dr. M L King Jr Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Brownsville Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Earlington Heights Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Allapattah Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Santa Clara Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Civic Center Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Culmer Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Overtown Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Brickell Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Vizcaya Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Coconut Grove Station 04/16/2017 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Douglas Road Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Douglass Road Metrorail Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the University Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the South Miami Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dadeland North Heights Station 04/27/2016 TPS Enclosed Electrical Room located at the Dadeland South Heights Station Knight Center Metromover Station Inner Loop at Electrical Room east of 88 SE 4 St entrance 04/27/2016 to Night Center main tower parking garage Grounds Maintenance to 10235 SW 186 St (Lot Size 87,692 sq.
    [Show full text]