D4.1 Final Report on Relationships Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D4.1 Final Report on Relationships Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem EC Contract Ref: FP7-ENV-2011- 282743 Deliverable: D4.1 Final report on relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values in case studies PART I: Literature review of the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values Due date of deliverable: 31 August 2014 Actual submission date: 31 August 2014 Version: Final Main Authors: P.A. Harrison, M. Termansen, P.M. Berry, M. Blicharska, U. Brandweiner, M. Bucur, R. Dunford, B. Egoh, N. Geamănă, W. Geertsema, J.R. Haslett, H. Lindhjelm, E. Lommelen, L. Martinsen, L. Mathieu, L. Meiresonne, F. Møller, C. Polce, P. Rajapakshe, J. Smart, G. Simpson, R. Tinch and F. Turkelboom Reviewer: Alison Smith Dissemination: PU Keywords: Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity, Values D4.1 Final report on relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values in case studies (Part I) 1 Literature review of the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values P.A. Harrison1, M. Termansen2, P.M. Berry1, M. Blicharska3, U. Brandweiner4, M. Bucur5, R. Dunford1, B. Egoh6, N. Geamănă5, W. Geertsema7, J.R. Haslett4, H. Lindhjelm8, E. Lommelen9, L. Martinsen2, L. Mathieu10,L. Meiresonne9, F. Møller2, C. Polce2, P. Rajapakshe2, J. Smart2, G. Simpson1, R. Tinch10 and F. Turkelboom9 1 Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK 2 Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, Roskilde 4000, Denmark 3 Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7050, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden 4 Department of Organismal Biology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Strasse 34, Salzburg 5020, Austria 5 Departamentul de Ecologie Sistemica si Dezvoltare Durabila, Universitatea din Bucuresti, Spl. Independentei 91-95, 050095 Bucuresti, Romania 6 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy 7 Alterra-Wageningen UR, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 8 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Oslo Centre for Interdisciplinary Environmental and Social Research (CIENS), Norway 9 Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Kliniekstraat 25, Brussels 1070, Belgium 10 EFTEC, 73-75 Mortimer Street, London, W1W 7SQ UK D4.1 Final report on relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values in case studies (Part I) 2 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Methods for studying the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services ..... 4 1.2 Methods for studying the relationship between ecosystem services and values .............. 8 2. Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Literature review on the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Mapping the empirical evidence of relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values using network analysis ...................................................................... 17 3. Results ......................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Literature review on the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values ................................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Mapping the empirical evidence of the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values using network analysis ...................................................................... 31 4. Discussion and conclusions ......................................................................................................... 45 5. References................................................................................................................................... 49 Appendix 1: Keywords used in the literature review on linkages between biodiversity and ecosystem services .................................................................................................................................................. 53 Appendix 2: Definitions of ESPs and biodiversity attributes used in the literature review .................. 55 Appendix 3: Full literature review results ............................................................................................. 57 A3.1 Timber production ............................................................................................................ 57 A3.2 Freshwater fishing ............................................................................................................ 62 A3.3 Freshwater provision ........................................................................................................ 66 A3.4 Water purification ............................................................................................................. 73 A3.5 Water flow regulation (flood protection) ......................................................................... 79 A3.6 Mass flow regulation (erosion protection) ....................................................................... 87 A3.7 Atmospheric regulation (carbon sequestration) .............................................................. 91 A3.8 Pest regulation .................................................................................................................. 99 A3.9 Pollination ....................................................................................................................... 104 A3.10 Recreation activities ....................................................................................................... 110 A3.11 Landscape aesthetics ...................................................................................................... 119 A3.12 References ...................................................................................................................... 125 D4.1 Final report on relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem services and values in case studies (Part I) 3 1. Introduction Although ecosystem services are generated from myriad interactions occurring in complex systems, improving understanding of at least some of the key relationships between biodiversity and service provision will help guide effective arguments for biodiversity conservation. Considerable research has been undertaken on the contribution of biodiversity to selected ecosystem processes, and scientists have begun to extend such work to include ecosystem services. Nevertheless, there are still numerous uncertainties and gaps in scientific knowledge on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services. It is unclear how these uncertainties affect decision-makers’ perceptions of the value of biodiversity and their subsequent decisions related to biodiversity conservation. BESAFE has advanced the state-of-the-art in this area by undertaking a systematic review of the contribution of relevant aspects of biodiversity (e.g. key species abundance, functional traits) to the delivery of specific ecosystem services and their associated economic and social values. Existing methods for evaluating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services and the implications for the valuation of biodiversity have been reviewed and their relevance for the BESAFE case studies assessed. These include approaches which aim to determine the importance of biodiversity for ecosystem service delivery, such as the identification of Ecosystem Service Providers, Service Providing Units and functional traits which can be linked to service provision (Section 1.1). Furthermore, the project has reviewed methodological approaches relevant for the valuation of different types of ecosystem services (Section 1.2). The review focuses on scientific literature to gather the best available evidence, but many of these papers result from previous EU-funded projects, such as the FP6 RUBICODE project (Section 2). The results have been analysed to assess general patterns of linkages across ecosystem services (Section 3.1). A typology of biodiversity – ecosystem service relationships has also been created to structure existing evidence using network analysis (Section 3.2). Full results of the literature searches for each ecosystem service are presented in the Annex to the main report. 1.1 Methods for studying the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services Over two decades of research has demonstrated a clear link between biodiversity and key ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling or biomass accumulation (Cardinale et al., 2012). More recently, this has been complemented by a growing body of research exploring the role of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services of value to humans, such as climate regulation and water purification. As this research field has evolved, awareness has grown that biodiversity cannot be described simply by the number of species present in an ecosystem (species richness). The number, abundance, composition and spatial patterns of species, genotypes, populations and functional groups are all important aspects of biodiversity (Díaz et al., 2007a). Research has revealed that
Recommended publications
  • (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from ILAM and KERMANSHAH PROVINCES, WESTERN IRAN
    Entomol. Croat. 2015, Vol. 19. Num 1–2: 55–66 doi: 10.17971/EC.2015.19.07 A FAUNISTIC STUDY OF ICHNEUMONID WASPS (HymenopteRA: Ichneumonidae) FROM ILAM AND KERMANSHAH PROVINCES, WESTERN IRAN Hassan Ghahari1 & Reijo Jussila2 1Department of Plant Protection, Yadegar – e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran; email: [email protected] 2Zoological Museum, Section of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, FI 20014 University of Turku, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: October 2015 This paper deals with a faunistic survey on ichneumonid wasps (Hyme- noptera, Ichneumonidae) from some regions of Ilam and Kermanshah provin- ces (western Iran). In total 19 species from the nine subfamilies Alomyinae, Cremastinae, Cryptinae, Diplazontinae, Ichneumoninae, Metopiinae, Pimpli- nae, Tersilochinae, and Tryphoninae were collected and identified. Two speci- es Probles (Microdiaparsis) microcephalus (Gravenhorst, 1829) and Tersilochus (Pectinolochus) striola (Thomson, 1889) are new records for Iran. Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ilam, Kermanshah, new record, Iran H. GHAHARI I R. JUSSILA: Faunističko istraživanje parazitskih osica (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) iz provincija Ilam i Kermanshah, zapadni Iran. Entomol. Croat. Vol. 19. Num. 1–4: 55–66. U radu je prikazano faunističko istraživanje parazitskih osica (Hymenop- tera, Ichneumonidae) iz nekih područja provincija Ilam i Kermanshah (zapad- ni Iran). Ukupno je sakupljeno i determinirano 19 vrsta osica iz 9 podporodica (Alomyinae,
    [Show full text]
  • Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences
    Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for Plant–Pollinator Interactions Benoît Geslin, Benoit Gauzens, Mathilde Baude, Isabelle Dajoz, Colin Fontaine, Mickaël Henry, Lise Ropars, Orianne Rollin, Elisa Thébault, Nicolas J. Vereecken To cite this version: Benoît Geslin, Benoit Gauzens, Mathilde Baude, Isabelle Dajoz, Colin Fontaine, et al.. Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for Plant–Pollinator Interactions. Advances in Ecological Research, Elsevier, 2017, 57, pp.147-199. 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.007. hal-01497637 HAL Id: hal-01497637 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01497637 Submitted on 26 Jun 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for Plant–Pollinator Interactions B. Geslin*,1, B. Gauzens†, M. Baude{, I. Dajoz§, C. Fontaine¶, M. Henry||, L. Ropars*,§, O. Rollin#,**,E.Thebault §, N.J. Vereecken†† *Institut Me´diterraneen de Biodiversite et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE-UMR-CNRS-IRD 7263), Equipe Ecologie de la Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Tersilochinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) of Israel. Part 1
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 48 (2), pp. 113–121 (2 July 2018) This contribution is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Dan Gerling, a scientist, a colleague and a friend Tersilochinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) of Israel. Part 1 ANDREY I. KH A L ai M Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia, and Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Cd. Victoria, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Tersilochinae fauna of Israel is reviewed. Five genera with nine species are found to occur in Israel: Aneuclis brevicauda (Thomson), A. incidens (Thom- son), Diaparsis gerlingi n. sp., D. nitida Horstmann, D. frontella (Holmgren), Ge lanes clavulatus Khalaim & Blank, G. simillimus Horstmann, Palpator turpi- lucricupidus Khalaim and Phradis interstitialis (Thomson). Two more genera, Prob les Förster and Tersilochus Holmgren, are formally recorded here from Is- rael but excluded from the present paper and will be treated separately. KEYWORDS: Ichneumonidae, Tersilochinae, Middle East, fauna, new species, new records, parasitoids, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION Tersilochinae is a moderately large subfamily of ichneumonid wasps of world- wide distribution. It comprises approximately 500 described species, with 190 spe- cies in 13 genera known to occur in Europe (Yu et al. 2016; Khalaim & Várkonyi 2018). Most host records of Tersilochinae are from larvae of Coleoptera, mostly of the families Curculionidae, Chrysomelidae and Nitidulidae, but some tersi lochines are known as parasitoids of xyelid sawflies (Hymenoptera: Xyelidae) in staminate pine cones, gall-forming Pontania spp. (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) and leaf- mining Eriocraniidae (Lepidoptera) (Yu et al. 2016; Khalaim & Várkonyi 2018). Virtually nothing was known about the Tersilochinae of Israel before commen - cement of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Regulating the Population Dynamics and Damage Potential of Pollen Beetle (Meligethes Aeneus F.) on Crops of Oilseed Rape
    Factors regulating the population dynamics and damage potential of pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus F.) on crops of oilseed rape Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Marie-Luise Tölle geboren in Gifhorn Göttingen, Mai 2014 D 7 1. Referentin/Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal 2. Korreferentin/Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Andreas von Tiedemann Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.05.2011 Contents Table of contents page Chapter I General introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 The pest: Meligethes aeneus ............................................................................................. 2 Factors influencing the population dynamics of pollen beetle ............................................ 3 Possible effects of insecticides on population growth and damage of pollen beetle ........... 4 Parasitoids and parasitisation of pollen beetle ................................................................... 5 Trap cropping in oilseed rape ............................................................................................ 6 References ........................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter II Cultivar and phenology of winter oilseed rape affect the abundance and reproduction of Meligethes aeneus (Fabricius) ......................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Hymenoptera Research
    c 3 Journal of Hymenoptera Research . .IV 6«** Volume 15, Number 2 October 2006 ISSN #1070-9428 CONTENTS BELOKOBYLSKIJ, S. A. and K. MAETO. A new species of the genus Parachremylus Granger (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Conopomorpha lychee pests (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Thailand 181 GIBSON, G. A. P., M. W. GATES, and G. D. BUNTIN. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Georgia, USA 187 V. Forest GILES, and J. S. ASCHER. A survey of the bees of the Black Rock Preserve, New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) 208 GUMOVSKY, A. V. The biology and morphology of Entedon sylvestris (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a larval endoparasitoid of Ceutorhynchus sisymbrii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) 232 of KULA, R. R., G. ZOLNEROWICH, and C. J. FERGUSON. Phylogenetic analysis Chaenusa sensu lato (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) using mitochondrial NADH 1 dehydrogenase gene sequences 251 QUINTERO A., D. and R. A. CAMBRA T The genus Allotilla Schuster (Hymenoptera: Mutilli- dae): phylogenetic analysis of its relationships, first description of the female and new distribution records 270 RIZZO, M. C. and B. MASSA. Parasitism and sex ratio of the bedeguar gall wasp Diplolqjis 277 rosae (L.) (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Sicily (Italy) VILHELMSEN, L. and L. KROGMANN. Skeletal anatomy of the mesosoma of Palaeomymar anomalum (Blood & Kryger, 1922) (Hymenoptera: Mymarommatidae) 290 WHARTON, R. A. The species of Stenmulopius Fischer (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Opiinae) and the braconid sternaulus 316 (Continued on back cover) INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF HYMENOPTERISTS Organized 1982; Incorporated 1991 OFFICERS FOR 2006 Michael E. Schauff, President James Woolley, President-Elect Michael W. Gates, Secretary Justin O. Schmidt, Treasurer Gavin R.
    [Show full text]
  • 272496 Josef Berger
    Ecology of parasitoids and their hosts in oilseed rape fields Berger, Josef 2019 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Berger, J. (2019). Ecology of parasitoids and their hosts in oilseed rape fields. Media-Tryck, Lund University, Sweden. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 JOSEF BERGER JOSEF Ecology parasitoids of and their hosts in oilseed rape fields I Josef Berger, Martin Jönsson, Katarina Hedlund & Peter Anderson Ecology of parasitoids and (2015): Niche separation of pollen beetle parasitoids. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3:45. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00045 their hosts in oilseed rape fields II Josef Berger, Helena Hanson, Peter Anderson, Katarina Hedlund: The JOSEF BERGER role of landscape scale for the cabbage stem weevil and its parasitoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement of Entomophagous Arthropods in Agricultural Landscapes: Links to Pest Suppression
    EN59CH28-Schellhorn ARI 4 December 2013 16:25 Movement of Entomophagous Arthropods in Agricultural Landscapes: Links to Pest Suppression N.A. Schellhorn,1,∗ F.J.J.A. Bianchi,2 and C.L. Hsu3 1CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, and Sustainable Agriculture Flagship, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; email: [email protected] 2Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University, 6700 AN Wageningen, The Netherlands; email: [email protected] 3American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow, Washington, DC; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014. 59:559–81 Keywords The Annual Review of Entomology is online at predator, parasitoid, biological control, population dynamics, disturbance, ento.annualreviews.org functional traits, spatial and temporal scales This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161952 Abstract Copyright c 2014 by Annual Reviews. Entomophagous arthropods can provide valuable biological control services, All rights reserved Access provided by CSIRO on 05/15/15. For personal use only. but they need to fulfill their life cycle in agricultural landscapes often domi- ∗ Corresponding author nated by ephemeral and disturbed habitats. In this environment, movement is critical to escape from disturbances and to find resources scattered in Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014.59:559-581. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org space and time. Despite considerable research effort in documenting species movement and spatial distribution patterns, the quantification of arthropod movement has been hampered by their small size and the variety of modes of movement that can result in redistribution at different spatial scales. In ad- dition, insight into how movement influences in-field population processes and the associated biocontrol services is limited because emigration and im- migration are often confounded with local-scale population processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Interannual Landscape Changes Influence Plant–Herbivore
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 125 (2008) 266–268 www.elsevier.com/locate/agee Short communication Interannual landscape changes influence plant–herbivore–parasitoid interactions Carsten Thies a,*, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter b, Teja Tscharntke a a Department of Agroecology, Georg-August-University, Waldweg 26, 37073 Goettingen, Germany b Department of Animal Ecology I, Population Ecology, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany Received 17 April 2007; received in revised form 6 December 2007; accepted 21 December 2007 Available online 8 February 2008 Abstract The effects of interannual changes in landscape composition on herbivory and biological control of pollen beetles on oilseed rape were experimentally tested. Parasitism by specialized parasitoids decreased following rape crop expansion, and increased following rape crop reduction, indicating interannual dilution and crowding effects. In contrast, herbivory by rape pollen beetles did not respond to these landscape changes due to crop rotation, supporting the concept that specialist natural enemies are more affected by changing environments than their host or prey. When expansion of rape crop area between years exceeded 5% of the landscape, parasitism rates dropped below a threshold value of about 35%, below which classical biological control has rarely been reported. # 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Temporal landscape changes; Spatial ecology; Trophic interactions; Biological control 1. Introduction pollen beetle populations by attacking their larvae in rape flowers. In this experimental study, changes in herbivory on Spatial and temporal landscape dynamics are particularly oilseed rape by rape pollen beetles, and their mortality due to important in agricultural landscapes owing to rotations of parasitism were analyzed in 15 crop-dominated landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopaedia of Pests and Natural Enemies in Field Crops Contents Introduction
    Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops Contents Introduction Contents Page Integrated pest management Managing pests while encouraging and supporting beneficial insects is an Introduction 2 essential part of an integrated pest management strategy and is a key component of sustainable crop production. Index 3 The number of available insecticides is declining, so it is increasingly important to use them only when absolutely necessary to safeguard their longevity and Identification of larvae 11 minimise the risk of the development of resistance. The Sustainable Use Directive (2009/128/EC) lists a number of provisions aimed at achieving the Pest thresholds: quick reference 12 sustainable use of pesticides, including the promotion of low input regimes, such as integrated pest management. Pests: Effective pest control: Beetles 16 Minimise Maximise the Only use Assess the Bugs and aphids 42 risk by effects of pesticides if risk of cultural natural economically infestation Flies, thrips and sawflies 80 means enemies justified Moths and butterflies 126 This publication Nematodes 150 Building on the success of the Encyclopaedia of arable weeds and the Encyclopaedia of cereal diseases, the three crop divisions (Cereals & Oilseeds, Other pests 162 Potatoes and Horticulture) of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board have worked together on this new encyclopaedia providing information Natural enemies: on the identification and management of pests and natural enemies. The latest information has been provided by experts from ADAS, Game and Wildlife Introduction 172 Conservation Trust, Warwick Crop Centre, PGRO and BBRO. Beetles 175 Bugs 181 Centipedes 184 Flies 185 Lacewings 191 Sawflies, wasps, ants and bees 192 Spiders and mites 197 1 Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops 2 Index Index A Acrolepiopsis assectella (leek moth) 139 Black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) 45 Acyrthosiphon pisum (pea aphid) 61 Boettgerilla spp.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods Gary L Parsons Gerasimos Cassis Andrew R. Moldenke John D. Lattin Norman H. Anderson Jeffrey C. Miller Paul Hammond Timothy D. Schowalter U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon November 1991 Parson, Gary L.; Cassis, Gerasimos; Moldenke, Andrew R.; Lattin, John D.; Anderson, Norman H.; Miller, Jeffrey C; Hammond, Paul; Schowalter, Timothy D. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-290. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 168 p. An annotated list of species of insects and other arthropods that have been col- lected and studies on the H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. The list includes 459 families, 2,096 genera, and 3,402 species. All species have been authoritatively identified by more than 100 specialists. In- formation is included on habitat type, functional group, plant or animal host, relative abundances, collection information, and literature references where available. There is a brief discussion of the Andrews Forest as habitat for arthropods with photo- graphs of representative habitats within the Forest. Illustrations of selected ar- thropods are included as is a bibliography. Keywords: Invertebrates, insects, H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, arthropods, annotated list, forest ecosystem, old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysReview 14: of 67-81Tersilochinae (2009) (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) of China, with descriptions of four new species 67 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.14.141 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Review of Tersilochinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) of China, with descriptions of four new species Andrey I. Khalaim1, †, Mao-Ling Sheng2, ‡ 1 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St.Petersburg 199034, Russia. División de Estudios de Postgrado e Investigación, UAM Agronomía y Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Cd. Victoria 87149, México 2 General Station of Forest Pest Management, Th e State Forestry Administration, 58, Huanghe North Street, Shenyang 110034, P.R. China † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:ACF2AF20-5723-4507-AABB-CC7445B7A44A ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3C0EBDB7-26F7-469B-8DB1-5C7B1C6D9B89 Corresponding author: Andrey I. Khalaim ([email protected]) Academic editor: Gavin Broad | Received 24 March 2009 | Accepted 25 June 2009 | Published 13 July 2009 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:401D7B52-42FD-4641-87D1-510E21F8DEE6 Citation: Khalaim AI, Sheng M-L (2009) Review of Tersilochinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) of China, with de- scriptions of four new species. ZooKeys 14: 67-81. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.14.141 Abstract General data on distribution and available host records are provided for the seventeen known Chinese species of Tersilochinae, distributed in fi ve genera. Four species, Diaparsis (Diaparsis) nitidulentis sp. n., Probles (Euporizon) vulnifi cus sp. n., Tersilochus (Tersilochus) ningxiator sp. n. and T. (T.) runatus sp. n., are described from Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China. Diaparsis rara Horstmann and the subgenus Rugodiaparsis Horstmann of the genus Probles Förster are recorded from China for the fi rst time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamique Des Populations De Méligèthes, Brassicogethes Aeneus Fabr
    Dynamique des populations de méligèthes, Brassicogethes aeneus Fabr. (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) et de son principal parasitoïde, Tersilochus heterocerus Thomson (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) en fonction de l’hétérogénéité des paysages agricoles. : 2017SACLE035 Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Paris-Saclay NNT préparée à AgroParisTech École doctorale n°581 agriculture, alimentation, biologie, environnement et santé (ABIES) Spécialité de doctorat: agro-écologie Thèse présentée et soutenue à Paris, le 30 Novembre 2017, par Amandine Juhel Composition du Jury : Jane Lecomte Professeur, Université Paris-Sud (Unité ESE) Présidente Aude Vialatte Maitre de conférences ENSAT (UMR Dynafor) Rapporteur Xavier Fauvergue Directeur de recherche, INRA Sophia Antipolis (UMR ISA 1355) Rapporteur Anne-Marie Cortesero Professeur, Université de Rennes 1 (UMR IGEPP) Examinateur Corentin Barbu Chargé de recherche, INRA Grignon (UMR Agronomie) Encadrant Pierre Franck Chargé de recherche, INRA PACA (UMR PSH) Encadrant Muriel Valantin-Morison Directrice de recherche, INRA Grignon (UMR Agronomie) Directrice de thèse Remerciements De nombreuses personnes ont contribué à ce travail de thèse. Tout d’abord, je tiens à remercier Corentin, Jean, Muriel et Pierre. Sans vous ce projet ne serait rien. Muriel et Pierre, merci d’avoir mis en place ce projet. Muriel, merci à toi pour toutes les discussions sur les méligèthes et leur biologie mais aussi pour ton soutien. Pierre, merci pour ton soutien et ton aide en génétique et ton regard avisé sur les analyses et le recul que tu m’as apporté. Malgré la distance, on a réussi à bien échanger tout au long de ces trois ans. Je te remercie pour ta disponibilité lors de ces échanges, mais aussi lors de mes séjours à Avignon.
    [Show full text]