DOCSLIB.ORG

Confidential: for Review Only a Federal Job Guarantee and the Health of Americans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Confidential: for Review Only a Federal Job Guarantee and the Health of Americans BMJ Confidential: For Review Only A Federal Job Guarantee and the Health of Americans Journal: BMJ Manuscript ID BMJ-2019-052178 Article Type: Analysis BMJ Journal: BMJ Date Submitted by the 16-Aug-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Hensher, Martin; Deakin University, Deakin Health Economics; University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research Job Guarantee, Unemployment and Health, US Healthcare Reform, Keywords: Macroeconomics and Health, Modern Monetary Theory https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj Page 1 of 10 BMJ 1 2 3 1 4 2 5 6 3 Analysis 7 4 8 9 5 A Federal Job Guarantee and the Health of Americans 10 6 11 7 Martin Hensher, Associate Professor of Health Systems Financing and Organisation1,2 12 8 Confidential: For Review Only 13 14 9 15 10 1 Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University 16 11 2 Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania 17 12 18 13 Correspondence to: 19 20 14 Martin Hensher 21 15 Deakin Health Economics 22 16 Deakin University 23 17 221 Burwood Highway 24 18 Burwood 25 26 19 VIC 3125 27 20 Australia 28 21 29 22 Email: [email protected] 30 31 23 Phone: +61 3 9246 8143 32 24 33 25 Word count: 1977 34 26 References: 20 35 27 36 37 28 38 29 39 30 40 41 KEY MESSAGES 42 43 ● Recent proposals for a Federal Job Guarantee could see a future US 44 45 Government commit to provide assured work at a living wage for any 46 American who needed it 47 ● If implemented, a Job Guarantee could bring substantial health 48 improvements for the US population, through a variety of mechanisms 49 50 ● A Job Guarantee would also have important interactions with healthcare 51 coverage and costs, and needs to be considered in close conjunction with 52 healthcare reform proposals 53 ● The Job Guarantee is rooted in Modern Monetary Theory, an emerging 54 approach to macroeconomics that is gaining traction but which remains 55 56 controversial 57 58 59 31 60 32 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj BMJ Page 2 of 10 1 2 3 33 4 5 34 Contributors and sources 6 35 Martin Hensher has worked on health financing, planning and economics as a senior policy 7 8 36 maker and researcher in the United Kingdom, South Africa and Australia, and as a 9 10 37 consultant for the World Bank, World Health Organization and the European Commission. 11 38 Martin’s research on the ecological and economic sustainability of health care systems has 12 Confidential: For Review Only 13 39 included examining a number of emerging heterodox economic approaches, two of which 14 40 are gaining in significance: ecological economics and “Modern Monetary Theory” (MMT). 15 16 41 MMT economists’ proposal for a Federal Job Guarantee has gained some important support 17 42 and interest amongst a number of prominent US Democrats. There has been little or no 18 19 43 discussion of what a Job Guarantee or Modern Monetary Theory more generally might mean 20 21 44 for US health and healthcare. This article builds on the MMT literature (and its critics) and 22 45 on the broader literature on employment and health to draw some initial conclusions in this 23 24 46 area. 25 47 26 48 Patient involvement 27 28 49 No patients were involved. 29 30 50 31 51 Conflicts of Interest 32 33 52 We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have the following 34 53 interests to declare: 35 36 54 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Scholarship. 37 55 38 39 56 Licence 40 41 57 The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on 42 58 behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence (or non exclusive for government employees) on a 43 44 59 worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd ("BMJ"), and its Licensees to permit this 45 60 article (if accepted) to be published in The BMJ's editions and any other BMJ products and 46 47 61 to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in The BMJ's licence. 48 49 62 50 63 51 64 52 65 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj Page 3 of 10 BMJ 1 2 3 66 A Federal Job Guarantee and the Health of Americans 4 5 67 6 68 Standfirst 7 69 Some striking proposals for economic reform have emerged in the early stages of the race 8 70 for the 2020 Democratic Party nomination. Martin Hensher examines how a Federal Job 9 10 71 Guarantee might impact on US health and healthcare. 11 72 12 Confidential: For Review Only 73 Several proposals for very significant reform of the US healthcare sector have emerged from 13 14 74 the Democratic Party’s 2020 Presidential nomination contest and recent legislative 15 1 2 16 75 proposals. Yet less attention has been paid to a policy idea in the platforms of various 17 76 prominent Democrats which also has the potential to be of great significance to the health of 18 19 77 Americans – the proposal for a “Federal Job Guarantee”. This article will briefly describe the 20 78 concept of the Job Guarantee (JG) and its possible implications for health and healthcare. It 21 22 79 will also briefly outline the economic theory – “Modern Monetary Theory” (MMT) – in which 23 80 the Job Guarantee has its origin, and which is rapidly gaining attention in both economic and 24 25 81 political discourse. 26 27 82 28 83 29 30 84 The Job Guarantee 31 85 Two candidates for the Democratic Party’s 2020 Presidential nomination have included a 32 33 86 “job guarantee” or a guaranteed right to work in their platforms (Bernie Sanders, Kirsten 34 35 87 Gillibrand), and others have discussed it at various stages (e.g. Elizabeth Warren, Cory 36 88 Booker); it also figured in the recent Green New Deal resolution.3 More than one detailed 37 38 89 proposal for a Federal Job Guarantee has been published, but the best-developed comes 39 90 from a number of economists associated with the Modern Monetary Theory approach to 40 41 91 macroeconomics.4 Under it, a federally funded Public Service Employment program would 42 92 provide a standing offer of work at a living wage ($15 per hour in this proposal), along with 43 44 93 key benefits, including healthcare coverage. Employees of this program would be deployed 45 46 94 on a wide range of public works and community development activities, delivered through 47 95 federal, state, local and non-profit agencies. The authors argue that this proposal would 48 49 96 effectively eliminate unwanted joblessness and underemployment, and would rapidly force 50 97 up private sector wages to match this “living wage” alternative, lifting millions out of poverty 51 52 98 and greatly improving the incomes of the working poor.4 Proponents argue that the Job 53 99 Guarantee offers the most efficient “automatic stabilizer” for the economy throughout the 54 55 100 business cycle, able to adjust up and down to reflect the changing economic health of the 56 57 101 private sector. In economic downturns, the JG would provide guaranteed employment to 58 102 stop people falling into poverty and losing employability, while also supporting aggregate 59 60 103 demand to lift the economy out of recession. In boom times, workers will simply exit the JG https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj BMJ Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 104 program for the private sector, as firms offer higher wages to secure the additional labor they 4 5 105 need. 6 106 7 8 107 Health and Healthcare impacts of a Job Guarantee 9 10 108 Decades of accumulated evidence from the US and overseas have shown a strong and 11 109 consistent association between unemployment and a range of adverse health outcomes, 12 Confidential: For Review Only 13 110 including all-cause mortality, mortality from cardiovascular disease and suicide, and higher 14 111 rates of mental distress, substance abuse, depression and anxiety.5 6 More recent evidence 15 16 112 also indicates that job insecurity is similarly associated with poorer self-assessed health 17 113 status, mental distress, depression and anxiety.7 8 Unemployment and economic adversity 18 19 114 are intimately related with despair and lack of hope, which have increasingly been linked 20 9-11 21 115 with mortality and the rise and severity of the opioid epidemic. Figure 1 therefore 22 116 attempts to illustrate the direct health benefits that a JG program might be expected to bring 23 24 117 for individuals and populations. Clearly, a Job Guarantee program on this scale has not 25 118 been tried before, so it would be quite unjustified to claim that these health benefits can be 26 27 119 assured. Nonetheless, for health professionals and anyone concerned about population 28 120 health and the health of the poor and disadvantaged, the Job Guarantee certainly merits 29 30 121 much closer attention – implementing a JG program would indeed be a bold experiment, but 31 32 122 one that could offer dramatic payoffs in improved health status nationwide. 33 123 34 35 124 36 125 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bmj Page 5 of 10 BMJ 1 2 3 126 Figure 1: Health effects of a Job Guarantee Program 4 5 127 6 Pathways Mechanisms Likely Health Benefits 7 8 Decreased unemployment 9 Decreased 10 underemployment 11 12 Confidential:Reduced incentive For to Review claim Only disability benefits Reduced premature 13 Direct benefits for 14 individual Job » Increased wages for low- » mortality from suicide, 15 Guarantee workers paid workers opioid and substance 16 Decreased household abuse, cardiovascular 17 poverty disease 18 19 Reduced job insecurity Reduced mental distress, 20 Healthcare coverage depression and anxiety 21 22 Reduced opioid and other Increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Paper No. 517 What Are the Relative Macroeconomic Merits And
    Working Paper No. 517 What Are the Relative Macroeconomic Merits and Environmental Impacts of Direct Job Creation and Basic Income Guarantees? by Pavlina R. Tcherneva The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College October 2007 The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. The Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levy.org Copyright © The Levy Economics Institute 2007 All rights reserved. ABSTRACT There is a body of literature that favors universal and unconditional public assurance policies over those that are targeted and means-tested. Two such proposals—the basic income proposal and job guarantees—are discussed here. The paper evaluates the impact of each program on macroeconomic stability, arguing that direct job creation has inherent stabilization features that are lacking in the basic income proposal. A discussion of modern finance and labor market dynamics renders the latter proposal inherently inflationary, and potentially stagflationary. After studying the macroeconomic viability of each program, the paper elaborates on their environmental merits. It is argued that the “green” consequences of the basic income proposal are likely to emerge, not from its modus operandi, but from the tax schemes that have been advanced for its financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Automation, Financialization, and Institutional Change: Challenges for Progressive Policy
    Automation, Financialization, and Institutional Change: Challenges for Progressive Policy Avraham Izhar Baranes Elmhurst College Abstract: This paper argues that the issue of “technological unemployment” resulting from automation is the result of ceremonial encapsulation within the process of progressive institutional adjustment. While institutions of production have adjusted to account for new technological developments, institutions of distribution have not. As discussed here, the main cause of this lack of adjustment is a financialized economy, in which shareholder returns motivate and dominate economic decision making and activity. As a result, gains and benefits from technological advances exacerbate existing income inequality and reduces the power of labor. I discuss this issue in detail before explaining how progressive policies that divorce private wage-labor from access to the system of social provisioning may serve to smooth this process of institutional adjustment caused by the introduction of automated processes. JEL Codes: B52, I38, P16 Key Words: Financialization, Automation, Technological Unemployment, Institutional Change, Job Guarantee Word Count: 2,789 Submitted: 12/13/2019 In 1930, John Maynard Keynes made the following prediction: “In quite a few years – in our own lifetimes I mean – we may be able to perform all the operations of agriculture, mining, and manufacture with a quarter of the human effort to which we have been accustomed” (Keynes 1930 [2015], p. 80). Clearly, this prediction did not come true: work weeks in the United States today range from 44 to 50 hours on average, and up to 80 hours in the technology, finance, and manufacturing industries (Ward 2017). Meanwhile, fears of robots replacing workers – what Keynes referred to as technological unemployment – permeate the workforce, with those working manufacturing and production jobs at the highest risk of replacement (Brynjolfsson & McAfee 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Macroeconomics of Government Spending: Distinguishing Between Government Purchases, Government Production, and Job Guarantee Programs Thomas Palley June 2021
    WORKING PAPER 2107 The Macroeconomics of Government Spending: Distinguishing Between Government Purchases, Government Production, and Job Guarantee Programs Thomas Palley June 2021 POST-KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS SOCIETY The Macroeconomics of Government Spending: Distinguishing Between Government Purchases, Government Production, and Job Guarantee Programs Abstract This paper reconstructs the Keynesian income – expenditure (IE) model to include distinctions between government purchases of private sector output, government production, and government job guarantee program (JGP) employment. Analytically, including those distinctions transforms the model from a single sector model into a multi- sector model. It also surfaces the logic behind the automatic stabilizer property of JGP employment. The model is then extended to include Kaleckian income distribution effects which contribute to explaining why expenditure multipliers vary by type of fiscal expenditure. The Kaleckian version generates a new balanced budget multiplier driven by changed composition of government spending. It also illuminates some macroeconomic implications of privatization of government produced services. Keywords: Government spending, government production, balanced budget multiplier, automatic stabilizers, job guarantee program JEL ref.: E10, E12, E62. May 2021 Thomas I. Palley Washington, DC [email protected] 1. Introduction: updating the macroeconomics of government spending Government spending is a significant component of aggregate demand (AD). In years to come, it may increase considerably owing to revived political interest in infrastructure renewal and the need for new infrastructure to meet the challenge of climate change. There is also political interest in more spending to meet healthcare and education needs. This paper seeks to update Keynesian macroeconomics so as to include different types of government spending. The paper introduces distinctions between conventional government spending (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jobs Crisis © OECD 2009
    ISBN 978-92-64-06791-2 OECD Employment Outlook Tackling the Jobs Crisis © OECD 2009 Chapter 1 The Jobs Crisis: What Are the Implications for Employment and Social Policy? The world economy is experiencing the worst recession in the post-war period and governments need to respond vigorously to limit the social and economic costs of the resulting jobs crisis. A first priority is to assure that income support for job losers and other workers who need it is adequate and accessible. Temporary extensions of unemployment benefit duration or the coverage of non-standard workers may be desirable in some countries, provided incentives to find a new job are not undercut, as may be judicious expansions of in-work benefits or last-resort social assistance. A second priority is to scale up effective active labour market policies so as to provide increased numbers of jobseekers with the re-employment assistance they require and minimise the build-up of long-term joblessness. Core job-search assistance should be maintained through the downturn. However, greater emphasis on training, hiring subsidies and public-sector job creation (and other forms of subsidised work experience) may be required to shore-up activation regimes and ensure that more disadvantaged jobseekers do not disconnect from the labour market. It is also important to maintain effective labour supply and thus to resist the temptation to open pathways to early retirement and disability benefits. This proved to be a mistake in the past that was difficult to reverse and should not be repeated. The initial responses of OECD governments to the crisis appear to be largely consistent with these principles, but it is too early to evaluate their ultimate effectiveness in helping workers weather the storm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Federal Job Guarantee Program
    THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL JOB GUARANTEE PROGRAM William Darity, Jr. Samuel DuBois Cook Distinguished Professor of Public Policy, Duke Sanford School of Public Policy Dawn Milam Senior Advisor, The Justice Collaborative Institute September 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The coronavirus pandemic has brought the ⊲ Invest in projects that benefit the public, country to the brink of economic collapse. While such as caregiving (especially child and elder the CARES Act provided some temporary relief, care); the conservation of natural resources; sustained economic recovery requires a plan the creation of emergency relief programs; to give unemployed workers an opportunity investments in education, health, and culture; to support themselves and their families with and the building of critical infrastructure. dignity. New Deal-style federal jobs programs It would also make these services affordable can help eliminate working poverty and create a for all. more stable, inclusive economy. Congress should establish a program that provides a true public ⊲ Offer a better response to economic crises option for employment and gives existing workers, like the pandemic by eliminating the need for particularly those confined to the low end of the poorly paid and unsafe employment. labor market, jobs in projects that will serve the Polling by Data for Progress and The Justice public welfare. Collaborative Institute shows strong bipartisan A federal job guarantee program would: support for a federal job guarantee program. Sixty-four percent of likely voters, including 78% ⊲ Provide a permanent public option for of Democrats and 53% of Republicans, said they workers to receive training, living wages, would support a federal job guarantee program benefits, better working conditions, and full as part of the government’s response to the worker rights, as a true alternative to the economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • What Jobs Should a Public Job Guarantee Provide? Lessons from Hyman P
    Working Paper No. 981 What Jobs Should a Public Job Guarantee Provide? Lessons from Hyman P. Minsky by Daniel Haim* Levy Institute January 2021 * The author would like to thank L. Randall Wray, Michael Ertl, and Diana Witzani for thoughtful comments and suggestions. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2021 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X ABSTRACT The job guarantee is a viable policy option for tackling both unemployment and underemployment. Hyman P. Minsky was one of the seminal writers on this subject. The first part of this working paper provides a survey of Minsky’s writings to identify what kind of jobs he had in mind when recommending employer-of-last-resort policies. Minsky favored: (1) jobs increasing socially useful output, providing all of society better public services and goods; (2) jobs guaranteed by the public sector on a project-by-project basis at a minimum wage; (3) jobs in the places where people need them; and (4) jobs taking the people that need them as they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcott Degrowth-Job-Guarantee.Pdf
    Journal of Cleaner Production xxx (2011) 1e5 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Should degrowth embrace the Job Guarantee? Blake Alcott* University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, 8038 Zürich, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: Degrowth should consider the right to work e a Job Guarantee (JG) e as a way of making a smaller Received 30 November 2010 economy more just and socially sustainable. Economic shrinkage in richer countries is accompanied by Received in revised form increased unemployment, a bad enough problem in itself but also a barrier to voters’ acceptance of the 6 June 2011 degrowth path. Since being out of work is distinct from being poor, anti-poverty income policies should Accepted 9 June 2011 be approached separately. The JG is one of several paths to full employment, including reduced working Available online xxx time. This essay only briefly mentions some real-world JG programs and some technical objections. The main suggestion is to move employment from being a matter of economics, particularly economic Keywords: fi Degrowth growth, to being a political right. A right to work is necessarily effective and would avoid sacri cing the Unemployment ecological and social goals of degrowth on the altar of full employment. Job Guarantee Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Employer of last resort Right to work Guaranteed income 1. Epigraphs To make a smaller economy more socially sustainable, as well as to make the degrowth project more attractive to voters, the problem of If a man has no chance of obtaining work he is in a desperate potentially large-scale joblessness therefore deserves attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Guaranteed Jobs: Too Big to Succeed
    GUARANTEED JOBS: TOO BIG TO SUCCEED Guaranteed Jobs: Too Big to Succeed Anne Kim May 2018 P1 GUARANTEED JOBS: TOO BIG TO SUCCEED MAY 2018 Guaranteed Jobs: Anne Kim Too Big to Succeed INTRODUCTION As the party out of power, But if Democrats are to craft a winning agenda for 2020, bigness and boldness alone are Democrats have the luxury of insufficient; political feasibility and substantive thinking big as they consider plausibility are also necessary ingredients. That’s why the latest big and bold idea catching the eye how to topple President of potential 2020 contenders – a federal jobs Donald Trump in 2020. Bold, guarantee – is ultimately a disappointment. ambitious ideas are what Touted by advocates as a way to achieve the party sorely needs if it is “permanent full employment,”1 the notion of a federally guaranteed job for anyone who wants to capture voters’ attention one has won support from three rumored and woo them from Trump’s presidential hopefuls so far, including New York corrosive grip. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand,2 Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Last week, Booker revealed draft legislation3 to pilot a federal jobs guarantee program in up to 15 localities nationwide, while Sanders has floated a much more ambitious national plan4 focused on public works projects at a scale not seen since the Great Depression. Under both proposals, participants would earn wages of up to $15 an hour, along with benefits such as paid family and sick leave and health insurance. “There is great P2 GUARANTEED JOBS: TOO BIG TO SUCCEED dignity in work – and in America, if you want to Unfortunately, the idea also suffers from a provide for your family, you should be able to find variety of fatal defects, including its size, timing a full-time job that pays a fair wage,” said Booker and relevance and any number of practical in a press release announcing his effort.5 obstacles that make it administratively unworkable as well as politically untenable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Path to Full Employment
    PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT: A PATH TO FULL EMPLOYMENT L. Randall Wray, Flavia Dantas, Scott Fullwiler, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, and Stephanie A. Kelton April 2018 Levy Economics Institute of Bard College PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT A PATH TO FULL EMPLOYMENT L. Randall Wray Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Flavia Dantas State University of New York at Cortland Scott Fullwiler University of Missouri–Kansas City Pavlina R. Tcherneva Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Stephanie A. Kelton Stony Brook University, and Levy Economics Institute of Bard College A series of Levy Institute publications (published and forthcoming) provide more detail on the topics found in each section of this report. These background papers include: L. Randall Wray, Stephanie A. Kelton, Pavlina R. Tcherneva, Scott Fullwiler, and Flavia Dantas, “Guaranteed Jobs through a Public Service Employment Program,” Policy Note 2018/2, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College L. Randall Wray and Flavia Dantas, “Full Employment: Are We There Yet?” Public Policy Brief No. 142, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Flavia Dantas and L. Randall Wray, “The Public Service Employment Program: Projections of the Program’s Size, Demographics, and Impacts on Poverty,” Working Paper, Forthcoming, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Scott Fullwiler, “Simulating a Large Job Guarantee Paying Above Poverty-Level Wages Plus Benefits,” Working Paper, Forthcoming, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Pavlina R. Tcherneva, “The Job Guarantee: Design, Jobs, and Implemenation,”
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Unemployment and the Job Guarantee Alternative in Saudi
    The Cost of Unemployment and the Job Guarantee Alternative in Saudi Arabia Fadhel Kaboub President, Binzagr Institute for Sustainable Prosperity Associate Professor, Denison University Mathew Forstater Research Director, Binzagr Institute for Sustainable Prosperity Professor, University of Missouri – Kansas City Michael Kelsay Research Scholar, Binzagr Institute for Sustainable Prosperity Lecturer, University of Missouri – Kansas City Policy Report No. 101 (July 2015) www.Binzagr-Institute.org Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the excellent research assistance of Aqdas Afzal, Abdulelah Alrasheedy, Mohammed Al Yousif, Natalie Brown, Andrew Kujaribu, Brian Matlock, and Brian Werner at UMKC, and Laura Venzke and Logan Smith at Denison University. We are grateful to Mr. Saeid Binzagr and the Binzagr family for their ongoing support. 2 Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Assessing the Costs of Unemployment in Saudi AraBia ..................................................... 10 1. Economic Costs of Unemployment ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Job Guarantee: Design, Jobs, and Implementation
    Working Paper No. 902 The Job Guarantee: Design, Jobs, and Implementation Pavlina R. Tcherneva Levy Economics Institute of Bard College April 2018 The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2018 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X ABSTRACT The job guarantee (JG) is a public option for jobs. It is a permanent, federally funded, and locally administered program that supplies voluntary employment opportunities on demand for all who are ready and willing to work at a living wage. While it is first and foremost a jobs program, it has the potential to be transformative by advancing the public purpose and improving working conditions, people’s everyday lives, and the economy as a whole. This working paper provides a blueprint for operationalizing the proposal. It addresses frequently asked questions and common concerns. It begins by outlining some of the core propositions in the existing literature that have motivated the JG proposal. These propositions suggest specific design and implementation features. (Some questions are answered in greater detail in appendix III).
    [Show full text]
  • The Job Guarantee and Municipal Confederalism: Exploring the National and Local Levels of Program Operation
    CHAPTER 6 The Job Guarantee and Municipal Confederalism: Exploring the National and Local Levels of Program Operation Mathew Forstater n recent years, an approach to full employment known alternatively as Employer of Last Resort (ELR), Job Guarantee (JG), and Public IService Employment (PSE) has been put forward as an effective strat- egy for eliminating involuntary unemployment and promoting economic stability. It has also been argued that JG may be used to promote envi- ronmental sustainability and, more generally, as a vehicle for progressive social policies (Forstater, 2004). Most of the recent proposals for a JG have been put forward within what has come to be known as Modern Mon- etary Theory (MMT), a term that encompasses the Chartalist approach to money and the functional finance approach to managing government budgets (Wray, 1998). The challenge for the JG policy approach is to find the right balance between the national and local levels of its political operation. On the one hand, modern money and functional finance require that the program be paid for at the federal level, but, on the other hand, most propos- als have program management and organization conducted at the local level by NGOs (nongovernmental organizations) and local governments. March 6, 2013 19:23 MAC-US/PLOY Page-145 9781137324771_08_cha06 146 ● Mathew Forstater This chapter outlines the ways in which the communitarian anarchist and social ecology notion of “municipal confederalism” presents possibilities for an appropriate mix of regional and local aspects of JG, along with other advantages of the municipal confederalist framework (and anar- chism generally), including opening up spaces for noncapitalist social relations of production.
    [Show full text]