City of Darwin Eighty-Third Ordinary Meeting of The

Reports, recommendations and supporting documentation can be accessed via the City of Darwin Website at www.darwin.nt.gov.au, at Council Public Libraries or contact Linda Elmer on (08) 89300 670. 1

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/1 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

CITY OF DARWIN

EIGHTY-THIRD ORDINARY MEETING OF THE TWENTIETH COUNCIL

TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

MEMBERS: The Right Worshipful, Lord Mayor, Mr G R Sawyer (Chairman); Member J D Bailey; Member R T Dee; Member R K Elix; Member H I Galton; Member R M Knox; Member G A Lambert; Member R Lesley; Member F P Marrone; Member A R Mitchell; Member K M Moir; Member J L Sangster; Member H D Sjoberg.

OFFICERS: Acting Chief Executive Officer, Mr J Banks; General Manager Corporate Services, Mr F Crawley; General Manager Infrastructure, Mr L Cercarelli; Executive Manager, Mr M Blackburn; Committee Administrator, Ms L Elmer.

GUESTS: Ms Lia Finocchiaro, General Manager of the Italian Festival Association, accompanied by Mr Ross Finocchiaro will be in attendance from 5.15 p.m. to brief the Council on their request to use East Point in 2013.

Enquiries and/or Apologies: Linda Elmer E-mail: [email protected] PH: 89300 670

* * * I N D E X * * * PAGE

1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY ...... 4

2 THE LORD’S PRAYER ...... 4

3 MEETING DECLARED OPEN ...... 4

4 APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE ...... 4

5 DECLARATION OF INTEREST OF MEMBERS AND STAFF...... 5

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/1 1 2

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/2 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

6 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING/S

6.1 Ordinary Council Meetings 13/12/11...... 5

7 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING/S

7.1 Business Arising ...... 5

8 MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE ...... 5

9 DEPUTATIONS AND BRIEFINGS

9.1 Italian Festival Association...... 5

10 CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

10.1 Closure to the Public for Confidential Items...... 7 10.2 Moving Open Items Into Confidential ...... 7 10.3 Moving Confidential Items Into Open ...... 7

11 PETITIONS...... 8

12 NOTICES OF MOTION ...... 8

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.1 Various Letters sent to Development Assessment Services under Delegated Authority ...... 9 13.2 Development Application - Lots 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) Cato Street Town of Darwin - Subdivision to Create 2 Lots (Boundary Realignment) - PA2011/0898...... 12 13.3 Development Application for Section 3244 (11) Farrell Crescent Hundred of Bagot - Addition of 163 New Cabins to an Existing Caravan Park - PA2011/0972...... 21 13.4 Development Application for Lots 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) Progress Drive Town of Nightcliff - 132 Units Building in 4 Stages - PA2010/1403...... 37 13.5 Development Application Portions 1092 and 1145 (6 and 4) Berrimah Road Town of Bagot - Mixed Use Development Comprising a Shop, Restaurant, 26 Motel Suites, 20 x 2 Bedroom Serviced Apartments (dual key) and a Caretaker’s Residence- PA2011/0973...... 137

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/2 2 3

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/3 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS (Cont’d)

13.6 Development Application for Lots 2193 (79) Smith Street, 2194 (81) Smith Street; 2197 (6) Briggs Street; 2203 (3) Mott Court, Town of Darwin - 186 Motel Suites, Restaurant and a Caretaker's Residence in an 11 Storey Building and 90 x 1 Bedroom and 20 x 2 Bedroom Multiple Dwellings in a 13 Storey Building Plus 2 Levels of Basement Parking - PA2011/0956...... 158 13.7 Development Application for Lot 4687 (38) Gothenburg Crescent Town of Darwin - Response to the Deferral Decision - 11 x 2 bedroom Units in a 4 Storey Building with Ground Level Car Parking – PA2011/0660...... 186 13.8 Second Quarter Budget Review 2011/2012...... 219 13.9 COTA Request for Funds for Spillet House Repairs...... 229 13.10 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lyons – Community Consultation Outcomes ...... 234 13.11 Richardson Ward Regional Playground Community Consultation Feedback ...... 247

14 INFORMATION ITEMS AND CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED ...... 280

15 REPORTS OF REPRESENTATIVES...... 280

16 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS ...... 280

17 GENERAL BUSINESS...... 280

18 DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF NEXT ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING.281

19 CLOSURE OF MEETING TO THE PUBLIC...... 281

20 ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING AND MEDIA LIAISON...... 281

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/3 3 4

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/4 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

2 THE LORD’S PRAYER

3 MEETING DECLARED OPEN

4 APOLOGIES AND LEAVE OF ABSENCE

4.1 Apologies

4.2 Leave of Absence Granted

A. THAT it be noted that Member J D Bailey is an apology due to a Leave of Absence being previously granted on 29 November 2011 for the period 24 – 31 January 2012.

B. THAT it be noted that Member R K Elix is an apology due to a Leave of Absence being previously granted on 29 November 2011 for the period 27 December 2011 to 31 January 2012.

C. THAT it be noted that Member G A Lambert is an apology due to a Leave of Absence being previously granted on 29 November 2011 for the period 16 December 2011 to 31 January 2012.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

4.3 Leave of Absence Requested

THAT a Leave of Absence be granted for Member J D Bailey for the period 6 – 15 February 2012.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/4 4 5

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/5 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

5 DECLARATION OF INTEREST OF MEMBERS AND STAFF

6 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING/S

6.1 Confirmation of the Previous Ordinary Council Meeting Common No. 1955119

THAT the tabled minutes of the previous Ordinary Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 13 December 2011, be received and confirmed as a true and correct record of the proceedings of that meeting.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

7 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING/S

7.1 Business Arising

8 MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

9 DEPUTATIONS AND BRIEFINGS

9.1 Italian Festival Association Common No. 2136054

Ms Lia Finocchiaro, General Manager of the Italian Festival Association, accompanied by Mr Ross Finocchiaro will be in attendance from 5.15 p.m. to brief the Council on their request to use East Point in 2013.

THAT the presentation from the Italian Festival Association, in relation to their request to use East Point in 2013, be received and noted.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/5 5 6

Mission Statement

To provide greater Darwin with an annual or biennial italian festival that celebrates italian culture by showcasing italian food and beverages, art, music, language, performance, passion, theatre and other indicia.

IFA will adopt trading names from time to time that reflect Italian culture and heritage.

IFA shall involve, include and embrace to the most practicable extent, people of the Northern Territory who are of Italian origin or descent.

IFA shall recognise and celebrate the proud history of Territorians of Italian origin or descent.

Aims & Objectives

o To share Italian culture with the broader community. o To enhance the unity of the Italian community. o To provide a high quality cultural festival for the community. o To showcase the contribution of the Italian community to Darwin and the Northern Territory o To involve a broad range of businesses, community and sporting groups in the delivery of each Italian festival o To generate and operate in surplus that will be utilised to sustain ongoing festivals for IFA o To recognise at each Italian festival, the contribution of Italian’s to the Northern Territory verbally, visually and artistically.

ProposalProposalProposal Summary • Launch an Italian festival on either 4 May 2013 or 7 September 2013 • Venue – East Point Reserve at the Gun Turret end (large, retainable space) • Attract 10,000 – 15,000 patrons • 4pm - late • Showcase Italian culture and the history of the Italian contribution to the Territory • Magnificent theme, lighting, drama, costumes, culture, language and history • Emphasis on food and culture • Consensus and support of Friends of East Point, Military Museum (Artillery Association), Aeromodellers Club, Michael Gunner MLA, (Equestrian Club still to be contacted). • Major Considerations: • Environmental impact plan • Heritage considerations • Traffic management • Risk mitigation

6 7

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/6 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

10 CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

10.1 Closure to the Public for Confidential Items Common No. 1944604

THAT pursuant to Section 65 (2) of the Local Government Act and Regulation 8 of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations the meeting be closed to the public to consider the Confidential matters referred from Committees including Confidential Committee Items, and the following Items:-

Item Regulation Reason

C22.1 8(c)(ii) Information that would, if publicly disclosed, be likely to prejudice the maintenance or administration of the law.

C24.1 8(c)(iv) Information that would, if publicly disclosed, be likely to prejudice the interests of the council or some other person.

C26.1 8(c)(ii) Information that would, if publicly disclosed, be likely to prejudice the maintenance or administration of the law.

C26.2 8(c)(iv) Information that would, if publicly disclosed, be likely to prejudice the interests of the council or some other person.

C26.3 8(c)(iv) Information that would, if publicly disclosed, be likely to prejudice the interests of the council or some other person.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

10.2 Moving Open Items Into Confidential

10.3 Moving Confidential Items Into Open

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/6 7 8

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/7 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

11 PETITIONS

Nil

12 NOTICES OF MOTION

Nil

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/7 8 9

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/8 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.1 Various Letters sent to Development Assessment Services under Delegated Authority Common No. 1962248

THAT the following letters sent to Development Assessment Services, be received and noted:-

i) Incoming Letter - TCI - Notification of Proposed Telecommunications Facility at an Existing Site without a Development Application - 955 Reedbeds Road Darwin River - Darwin - Telstra Reference - River Dam Common No. 2144788

ii) Portions 1138 & 1318 (62 & 58) Winnellie Road Hundred of Bagot – Warehouse, showroom sales and offices in a single storey building. Common No. 2144260

iii) Portions 1138 & 1318 (62 & 58) Winnellie Road Hundred of Bagot – Consolidation to create one lot – PA2011/0885. Common No. 2144883

iv) Lot 1459 (3) Lindsay Street Town of Darwin - Storage shed Addition to an Existing Education Establishment - PA2011/0885 Common No.2144463

v) Portion 1855 (119A) Coonawarra Road Hundred of Bagot - Incoming Email - Lands & Planning - Seeks Comments - Proposed Consolidation Common No. 2145183 vi) Section 3073 (103) Reichardt Road Hundred of Bagot - Renovations and ancillary office addition to an existing warehouse - PA2011/0861 Common No. 2144886 vii) Section 5121 (5) Witte Street Hundred of Bagot - 6 warehouse units with ancillary mezzanine offices and 4 storage units in 2 buildings – PA2011/0887 Common No. 2144906

viii) Section 5847 (4) Verrinder Road Hundred of Bagot - General industry and ancillary office in a single storey building - PA2011/0888 Common No. 2144889

ix) Lot 6074 (66) Castlereagh Drive Town of Sanderson - Carport Addition to an Existing Single Dwelling Common No. 2147620

(Continued on next page…)

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/8 9 10

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/9 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.1 Various Letters sent to Development Assessment Services under Delegated Authority Common No. 1962248

x) Lot 6475 (68) Frances Bay Drive Town of Darwin - Proposed Development: 30 metre high communications tower, antennas and equipment shelter Common No. 1918790 xi) Lot 6867 (18) Annear Court Town of Darwin - Shade sail addition to an existing multiple dwelling (Unit 10). Common No. 2141464 xii) Lot 9096 (107) Old McMillans Road Town of Nightcliff - Verandah addition to an existing multiple dwelling (Unit 1) - PA2011/0890 Common No. 2144761 xiii) Lot 9308 (54) Bradshaw Terrace Town of Nightcliff - Change of use to leisure and recreation (24 hour gymnasium) (Part Unit 23) – PA2011/0915 Common No. 2144986 xiv) Lot 9672 (14) Caryota Court Town of Nightcliff - Unit plan subdivision to create 2 units and common property - PA2011/0909 Common No. 2144758 xv) Lot 9673 (16) Caryota Court Town of Nightcliff - Change of use from warehouse to office pa2011/0886 Common No. 2144551 xvi) Lot 2010 (17) Queen Street Town of Darwin - 4 x 3 bedroom multiple dwellings in 2 x 2 storey buildings – PA2011/0966 Common No. 2162042 xvii) Lot 2247 (12) Hinkler Crescent Town of Darwin - Unit plan subdivision to create 3 units and common property - PA2011/0932 Common No. 2162046 xviii) Lot 2528 (5) Margaret Street Town of Darwin - Carport addition to an existing multiple dwelling (Unit 3) with a reduced side setback – PA2012/0007 Common No. 2166209 xix) Aurecon - Lot 3139 (60) Batten Road Hundred of Bagot - Notification of Proposed Telecommunication Facility at an Existing Site Without Development Application, for the Installation of Three 2.63m Long Antennas on the Existing 35m High Vodafone Monopole at the Height of 25m (to the Centreline of the Antennas) and an Equipment Shelter at the Base of the Monopole. Common No. 2169082

(Continued on next page…)

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/9 10 11

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/10 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.1 Various Letters sent to Development Assessment Services under Delegated Authority Common No. 1962248

xx) Lot 4971 (6) Foster Court Town of Darwin - Unit plan subdivision to create 6 units and common property - PA2011/0948 Common No. 2162062

xxi) Section 5101 (45) Hickman Street Hundred of Bagot - Addition of ancillary office to existing general industry - PA2011/0939 Common No. 2162055

xxii) Sections 5309 (9) Downes & 5310 (12) Catterthun Streets Hundred of Bagot – Consolidation to create 1 lot - PA2011/0937 Common No. 2162049

xxiii) Lot 5396 (18) Cavenagh Street Town of Darwin - Facade upgrades to an existing building - PA2011/0965 Common No. 2161417

xxiv) Lot 5576 (29) Goodman Street Town of Nightcliff - Carport addition to an existing single dwelling with a reduced front setback - PA2011/0967 Common No. 2164141 xxv) Lots 5863 & 5864 (7 & 8) Perkins Court Town of Darwin – Consolidation to create one lot - PA2011/0958 Common No. 2162052 xxvi) Lot 5875 (6) Coburg Drive Town of Sanderson - Demountable structure with reduced side setback - PA2011/0946 Common No. 2161196 xxvii) Lot 6063 (10) Bathurst Street Town of Sanderson - Addition of two carports to an existing single dwelling with reduced front and side setbacks - PA2011/0980 Common No. 2164136 xxviii) Lot 8105 (5) Gardiner Street Town of Darwin - Changes to DP10/0349 to provide 2 additional dwelling units at Level 10 - PA2011/0951 Common No. 2161420 xxix) Lot 10319 (80) Damabila Drive Town of Nightcliff - Single dwelling with reduced front setbacks - PA2011/0964 Common No. 2161423 xxx) Lot 2309 (31) The Mall Town of Darwin 10 x 1 and 30 x 2 bedroom Multiple Dwellings and One Level of Commercial Tenancies in a 14 Storey Building

The letters are distributed as a separate attachment

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/10 11 12

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/11 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.2 Development Application - Lots 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) Cato Street Town of Darwin - Subdivision to Create 2 Lots (Boundary Realignment) - PA2011/0898 Report No. 12TS0001 (31/01/12) Common No. 2144770

Report Number 12TS0001 attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/11 12 13 2ND ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM :13.2

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) CATO SUBJECT: STREET, TOWN OF DARWIN. – PROPOSAL - SUBDIVISION TO CREATE 2 LOTS (BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT)

REPORT NO: 12TS0001 JS:fh COMMON NO: 2144770 Date: 31/01/2012

Presenter: Drosso Lelekis

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application for Lots 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) Cato Street, Town of Darwin (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

The issues addressed in this Report are in accordance with the following Goals/Strategies of the Darwin City Council 2008 – 2012 as outlined in the ‘Evolving Darwin Strategic Directions: Towards 2020 and Beyond’:-

Goal: 1. Achieve effective partnerships and engage in collaborative relationships. Outcome: 1.1 Improve relations with all levels of Government. Key Strategies: 1.1.4 Play a strategic role in the planning and developmental processes that impact Darwin.

KEY ISSUES

Lot sizes:

The Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions for acceptable lot sizes are outlined in Table to Clause 11.1.1 – Minimum Lot Sizes and Requirements. Clause 11.1.1 requires a minimum lot size of 1225 m2 for parcels zoned GI. The applicant’s proposal to realign the boundary between the subject sites, results in lot 6490 increasing in total area to 1193 m2 and lot 6491 decreasing in total area to 1062 m2. The response letter indicated that while Council does not necessarily support variations to specified lot sizes for zones in the Northern Territory Planning Scheme, considering that the parcels accommodate established businesses currently trading and that the boundary realignment results in minimal change in total lot size for the subject sites, it does not object.

Council’s ordinary conditions, in relation to subdivision pursuant to the Planning Act and Council’s responsibilities under the Local Government Act, were also recommended for inclusion in the Development Permit issued by the Development Consent Authority.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0001 JS:fh entitled Development Application for Lots 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) Cato Street, Town of Darwin for a Subdivision to Create 2 Lots (Boundary Realignment), be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment B to Report Number 12TS0001 JS:fh be endorsed.

13 14

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0001 JS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - LOTS 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) CATO STREET TOWN OF DARWIN - SUBDIVISION TO CREATE 2 LOTS (BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT)

BACKGROUND

No planning history exists for either of the subject sites.

DISCUSSION

Applicant: Mr Kevin Dodd

Site Description:

The subject sites are identified as lots 6490 and 6491, Town of Darwin, more commonly referred to as 9 and 11 Cato Street, Winnellie, respectively. Both allotments are zoned GI (General Industry) and have existing developments on site.

The existing buildings are in keeping with zone GI and are finished in white colorbond cladding. The sites are predominantly flat and slope downwards towards Benison Road with a sealed bitumen surface surrounding the buildings. There are a number of mature trees in the Cato Street road reserve with further landscaping being evident on the southern lot boundary of lot 6491.

Access to the subject sites is available via existing crossovers from Cato Street and Benison Road. A sewage easement in favour of the Power and Water Corporation runs along the entire rear boundary.

Assessment:

The proposed boundary realignment will increase the site area along the southern boundary of lot 6490, facilitating additional parking for this lot. The proposed lot sizes do not meet the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions for clause 11.1.1 - Minimum Lot Sizes and Requirements for the GI zone, however given that both the existing lots are currently under the 1225m2 minimum lot size and the subject sites accommodate existing business operations, it is not considered reasonable to object on this basis.

There are currently several car parking bays along the northern boundary of Lot 6491, it is unclear if these bays form part of the required parking for lot 6491, or if these are surplus bays as no details of the use or floor space area of the existing buildings have been provided in the application. It has been noted in comments to the Development Consent Authority that Council will not support a shortfall of parking on lot 6491 created as a result of the boundary alignment.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Council’s Infrastructure Department

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

14 15

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0001 JS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - LOTS 6490 & 6491 (9 & 11) CATO STREET TOWN OF DARWIN - SUBDIVISION TO CREATE 2 LOTS (BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT)

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

This planning application has no environmental implications.

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We the Presenter and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

DROSSO LELEKIS LUCCIO CERCARELLI MANAGER DESIGN, GENERAL MANAGER PLANNING & PROJECTS INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected]

15 16

16 17

17 18

18 19

19 20

20 21

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/12 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.3 Development Application for Section 3244 (11) Farrell Crescent Hundred of Bagot - Addition of 163 New Cabins to an Existing Caravan Park - PA2011/0972 Report No. 12TS0009 (31/01/12) Common No. 2161206

Report Number 12TS0009 attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/12 21 22

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.3

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR SECTION 3244 (11) FARRELL SUBJECT: CRESCENT HUNDRED OF BAGOT - PROPOSAL:- ADDITION OF 163 NEW CABINS TO AN EXISTING CARAVAN PARK - PA2011/0972.

REPORT NO. 12TS0009 WS:fh COMMON NO. 2161206 DATE: 31/01/2012

Presenter: Drosso Lelekis

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application for Lot 3244 (11) Farrell Crescent, Hundred of Bagot (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

KEY ISSUES:

 Addition of 163 new cabins to an existing caravan park  Stormwater drainage

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0009 WS:fh entitled Development Application for Section 3244 (11) Farrell Crescent Hundred of Bagot for the Addition of 163 New Cabins to an Existing Caravan Park - PA2011/0972, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment B to Report Number 12TS0009 WS:fh be endorsed.

22 23

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0009 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR SECTION 3244 (11) FARRELL CRESCENT HUNDRED OF BAGOT - PROPOSAL:- ADDITION OF 163 NEW CABINS TO AN EXISTING CARAVAN PARK - PA2011/0972

BACKGROUND

In March 2010, Council supported the granting of a Development Permit for the addition of 28 new cabins to the existing caravan park site. In December 2010, Council supported the granting of a Development Permit for the addition of 40 new cabins to the existing caravan park site.

DISCUSSION

Applicant: Mark Bell

Site Description:

The site is located on the corner of Stuart Highway and Farrell Crescent, Winnellie and is zoned MZ (Multi-Zone), with the portion of the site adjacent to the Stuart Highway being located in Zone PS (Public Open Space) and the remainder of the site, which is relevant to this application, being located in Zone CV (Caravan Park). The site is located adjacent to the Darwin Showgrounds.

The site is predominantly flat and there is a dense landscaped border to the Stuart Highway. There are existing cabins and caravan park spaces on the site. Access to the site is provided from Farrell Crescent.

History:

In March 2010, an approval was granted for the addition of 28 new cabins on the site. In February 2011, an approval was granted for the addition of another 40 cabins on the site. The current proposal is separate from the two preceding proposals and would add an additional new 163 cabins on the site, in addition to the already approved 28 cabins and 40 cabins, respectively.

Proposal:

The application proposes to located 163 cabins on the site, including 73 standard cabins and 2 disabled-access compliant cabins in stage 4 of the site development works and 88 standard cabins and laundry facilities in stage 5 of the site development works. There are a variety of internal design arrangements between the different cabin types. The cabins are classed as demountable structures.

The proposal complies with the required parking for caravan parks.

The existing on-site dense landscaping is proposed to be retained as part of the new development.

Due to the location of the site in proximity to the airport, an acoustic study has been provided.

23 24

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0009 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR SECTION 3244 (11) FARRELL CRESCENT HUNDRED OF BAGOT - PROPOSAL:- ADDITION OF 163 NEW CABINS TO AN EXISTING CARAVAN PARK - PA2011/0972

Assessment:

The proposal is in keeping with the nature of the existing business on the site, providing limited holiday accommodation facilities to visitors to the Darwin region. The addition of the cabins is not expected to result in a significant increase in the amount of traffic in the locality.

Council’s policy on demountable structures does not address structures within a caravan park zone. However, the proposal is not in conflict with any of requirements of the Council policy for demountable structures in residential, open space, industrial or commercial zones.

Council will require that an updated stormwater plan for the site be provided that confirms the swale drain within Lot 3243, 1 Tate Place, Darwin Showgrounds, is able to cope with the increased volume and capacity of stormwater due to the development.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

A site visit was conducted by the planner to investigate the existing site conditions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We the Presenter and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

DROSSO LELEKIS LUCCIO CERCARELLI MANAGER DESIGN, GENERAL MANAGER PLANNING & PROJECTS INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected] 24 25

25 26

26 27

27 28

28 29

29 30

30 31

31 32

32 33

33 34

34 35

35 36

36 37

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/13 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.4 Development Application for Lots 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) Progress Drive Town of Nightcliff - 132 Units Building in 4 Stages - PA2010/1403 Report No. 12TS0010 (31/01/12) Common No. 1915902

Report Number 12TS0010 attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/13 37 38 2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.4

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) SUBJECT: PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

REPORT NO. 12TS0010 WS:fh COMMON NO. 1915902 DATE: 31/01/2012

Presenter: Drosso Lelekis

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application for Lots 4965 & 8641 (63) & (65) Progress Drive Town of Nightcliff (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

KEY ISSUES:

 Traffic study by suitably qualified Traffic Engineer  Landscaping plans  Site and building design issues

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0010 WS:fh entitled Development Application for Lots 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) Progress Drive Town of Nightcliff for 132 Units Building in 4 Stages, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment C to Report Number 12TS0010 WS:fh .be endorsed.

38 39

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0010 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

BACKGROUND

The site is that of the now closed, Phoenix Hotel. Some upgrading works were completed since the original approval, including the conversion of the restaurant to a tavern, with the last application for upgrades being approved in 1990.

An application to develop the site with multiple dwellings was lodged in 2010. Council has provided three letters of comment to Development Assessment Services for this application, dated 17 December 2010, 2 February 2011, 20 January 2012, refer (Attachment B), which was revised and re-sent to reflect additional information refer (Attachment C).

Since that time, additional updated information has been provided. This report and letter provides an assessment of the additional information.

DISCUSSION

Applicant: Mark Bell

Site Description:

The subject site is identified as allotments 4965 and 8641, Town of Nightcliff, commonly known as 63 and 65 Progress Drive. The site comprises a total area of 10,710m2, with a primary frontage to Progress Drive of approximately 63m and a depth of approximately 140m. Adjacent the western boundary of the site is a 3m wide strip of road reserve that extends to within 17m of the rear boundary of the subject site. The road reserve is unmade and currently appears to be shared between the adjacent allotments. Progress Drive is considered a Primary Collector Road, within the ownership of the Darwin City Council. It connects to Casuarina Drive and provides a loop road around the areas of Nightcliff and Rapid Creek.

The remaining structures associated with the Phoenix Hotel have now been demolished and the site is surrounded by temporary screened fencing.

Within the locality consists of a mix of residential and commercial uses. Located adjacent the site to the east is a disused shop, to the west of the site is a bowling alley and residential dwellings to the rear of it. On the opposite side of Progress Drive are residential dwellings, the Nightcliff Shopping Centre and a service station.

Also within the locality of the site is the Woolworth’s shopping centre and a number of service stations. Public transport is available within close walking distance of the site, providing transport services to the City and Casuarina.

Proposal:

The proposal is to construct 92 x 2 and 46 x 3 bedroom dwellings in three, seven storey and one, six storey buildings, built in four stages. The proposal includes undercover car parking for 276 vehicles, 1 storage room per apartment, plus a gym/games room, pool and open space area for each of the four buildings. Car parking spaces are proposed to be covered by a carport where they are not located below the footprint of a building.

39 40

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0010 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

Aisles and driveways will not be covered other than where they traverse beneath a building.

Vehicle access to the site is gained from Progress Drive via a 6m wide driveway and secured by a remote access gate. The applicant proposes to landscape the Council road reserve to the front of the site and rearrange the existing 14 car parking spaces to accommodate a crossover directly on to Progress Drive. The proposed crossover will intersect with the existing cycle network and pedestrian network. The internal carriageways total, an approximate distance of over half a kilometre, with individual aisles of up to 60m in length, accessing 45 vehicle spaces.

Pedestrian access to the site is provided via three access points located at the north eastern corner along the primary frontage and two access points on the western boundary, at 50m and 80m south of the primary frontage. Each access point is via a secure gate with access leading to the relevant buildings lift and stairs.

Each gym/games room is approximately 46m2 in area and generally contains glass to the full extent of one wall, overlooking the pool or an open space area. Each pool is identical measuring 12.5m by 4.6m and abuts an open space area. The plans show the location of the pool fencing but fail to show the pool filter and chemical storage locations. The open space areas are available in four locations and are of varying size and shape. Each open spaces area shows at least 50m2 of usable area.

There are four bin compound locations and one collection location proposed as part of the development. The application allows that a caretaker will collect the bins as they fill and relocate them to the main collection compound for collection by the waste truck, as per the requirements of Council Policy Number 54 – Waste Management.

The floor plan of each of the four buildings is identical with four, two bedroom apartments and two, three bedroom apartments provided on each level. Balcony sizes range from 14m2 to 22m2 in area and are of a size and shape that makes them usable as a separate space or as an extension to the living rooms of the apartment.

The arrangement of the buildings is such that there are a number of opportunities for overlooking to bedrooms and balconies between buildings. The orientation of buildings two and three are such that overlooking opportunities are from bedroom to bedroom. Between buildings two and four, and three and four, the overlooking opportunities are between balconies where the separation is as little as 4.9m. Building one is 6.4m from building four and there exists an opportunity to overlook between a bedroom and balcony on each level.

The buildings appear to be well articulated by walls having relatively short lengths and the building being set back in a curved footprint. Window awnings and balconies protrude from the main structure to lessen the massing and assist in articulation. There is good architectural variation between the lower and upper half of the buildings by the lower balconies having pillars at the corner to give the lower levels the perception of providing a sturdy base to the upper half. There is concern, however, over the overuse of repetition throughout the site, which may devalue the amenity. At this stage, this is difficult to assess as limited documentation has been provided to be able to assess the view of the site from the locality.

40 41

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0010 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

Assessment:

Access.

Access to the site is currently via the Progress Drive service road with no direct access to the main thoroughfare. The service road connects to Progress Drive with an entry only at the round-a-bout at the north-east corner of the site, and a entry/egress at the north-west corner of the site.

The applicant proposes to install a cross over from the north-western corner of the site directly to Progress Drive, adjacent the dual crossover of the neighbouring allotment and the off-street parking bays that are directly accessible to Progress Drive. The proposed crossover will allow vehicles exiting the site to make both left and right hand turns onto Progress Drive.

A cycle way currently passes across the front of the site through the existing car park. The path is located so that the only intersection with vehicle swept paths is over the existing crossover. The applicant proposes to locate the cycleway in a similar location. However, in modifying the car parking area, the path will be located in the vehicle aisle and vehicles must reverse over the cycleway in order to enter or exit parking spaces. It is considered that this will increase the risk to safety of cyclists passing the subject site.

Pedestrian access across the site is provided adjacent Progress Drive on a pedestrian only path. Two pedestrian accesses to the site are provided one at the north-eastern corner and the other via the road reserve on the western boundary of the site.

The arrangement of vehicle, pedestrian and cycle access to, from and around the site becomes more confusing to the user with the introduction of an additional dual access crossover and the movements associated with the proposed development. There is an increase in the number of points where conflicts may occur between vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians as a result of the lack of clarity to vehicle flows. A comprehensive traffic study is requested to support the proposed arrangement at the Progress Drive interface to integrate safe vehicle, cycle and pedestrian movements. Also to assess the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding road network and to examine vehicle and pedestrian traffic on site.

Council has previously requested a traffic study be prepared for the site. The additional information provided by the applicant contains a traffic study; however, Council has conducted a preliminary review of this study which has highlighted that there may be several issues in regards to the submitted traffic study. In particular, it is not clear that the traffic study was prepared by a suitably qualified Traffic Engineer.

Also, Council previously had concerns over access for the proposed water meter location; The water meter has since been relocated on site and Power and Water Corporation have indicated acceptance of that location.

Council had previous concerns about the landscaping of the site, in particular, the extent of the works proposed within the road reserve and how these works would integrate with the adjacent road network. The applicant has provided additional landscaping plans; however, Council is still in the process of reviewing those plans for approval.

41 42

PAGE: 5 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0010 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

Waste.

The proposal is to construct four bin compounds and a central compound, from which the waste collection vehicle will collect all waste. Each bin compound will house four to five bins with the central compound providing storage for five bins and a bin transport vehicle, plus trailer. It has been confirmed that the body corporate will employ a caretaker whose duty will be to remove the full bins from the compounds and return them to the central compound for collection by the waste collection vehicle. As part of the supplemental information provided, the applicant indicated acceptable turning paths for waste collection vehicles and demonstrated that the vehicles can enter and exit the site in a forward direction, as requested previously by Council.

Stormwater.

A stormwater drainage plan has not been provided as part of the application. A stormwater drainage plan has been requested demonstrating all stormwater to be collected on the site and discharged underground to Council’s stormwater drainage system.

Site and Building Design.

The previous site design indicated an extensive awning over the western boundary of the site over Council property. The additional information provided indicates that this awning has been deleted, thus alleviating Council’s concerns.

Council also had previous concerns over the location of mail boxes. Australia Post has provided communication that the currently proposed location of post boxes is acceptable.

Council continues to have outstanding concerns about the expanse of boundary wall fronting Council land to the north and west of the site, the lack of privacy that is proposed between buildings and balconies, and the potential for poor on-site amenity due to the amount of impervious area on the site.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Through the Development Application statutory process.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

42 43

PAGE: 6 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0010 WS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS 4965 & 8641 (63 & 65) PROGRESS DRIVE TOWN OF NIGHTCLIFF - PROPOSAL:- 132 UNITS BUILDING IN 4 STAGES

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We the Presenter and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

DROSSO LELEKIS LUCCIO CERCARELLI MANAGER DESIGN, GENERAL MANAGER PLANNING & PROJECTS INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected]

43 44

44 45

45 46

46 47

47 48

48 49

49 50

50 51

51 52

52 53

53 54

54 55

55 56

56 57

57 58

58 59

59 60

60 61

61 62

62 63

63 64

64 65

65 66

66 67

67 68

68 69

69 70

70 71

71 72

72 73

73 74

74 75

75 76

76 77

77 78

78 79

79 80

80 81

81 82

82 83

83 84

84 85

85 86

86 87

87 88

88 89

89 90

90 91

91 92

92 93

93 94

94 95

95 96

96 97

97 98

98 99

99 100

100 101

101 102

102 103

103 104

104 105

105 106

106 107

107 108

108 109

109 110

110 111

111 112

112 113

113 114

114 115

115 116

116 117

117 118

118 119

119 120

120 121

121 122

122 123

123 124

124 125

125 126

126 127

127 128

128 129

129 130

130 131

131 132

132 133

133 134

134 135

135 136

136 137

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/14 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.5 Development Application Portions 1092 and 1145 (6 and 4) Berrimah Road Town of Bagot - Mixed Use Development Comprising a Shop, Restaurant, 26 Motel Suites, 20 x 2 Bedroom Serviced Apartments (dual key) and a Caretaker’s Residence- PA2011/0973 Report No. 12TS0011 (31/01/12) Common No. 2161463

Report Number 12TS0011 attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/14 137 138

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.5

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - PORTIONS 1092 AND 1145 (6 AND 4) BERRIMAH ROAD TOWN OF BAGOT – PROPOSAL - MIXED USE SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING A SHOP, RESTAURANT, 26 MOTEL SUITES, 20 X 2 BEDROOM SERVICED APARTMENTS (DUAL KEY) AND A CARETAKER’S RESIDENCE

REPORT NO. 12TS0011 CR:fh COMMON NO. 2161463 DATE: 31/01/2012

Presenter: Drosso Lelekis

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application for PORTIONS 1092 AND 1145 (6 AND 4) Berrimah Road Town Of Bagot (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

KEY ISSUES:

 Car Parking  Traffic Study  Consolidation of lots  Waste management  Stormwater management  Aircraft Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) guidelines

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0011 CR:fh entitled Development Application for Portions 1092 and 1145 (6 and 4) Berrimah Road Town of Bagot for Mixed Use Development Comprising a Shop, Restaurant, 26 Motel Suites, 20 X 2 Bedroom Serviced Apartments (dual key) and a Caretaker’s Residence, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment B to Report Number 12TS0011 CR:fh be endorsed.

138 139

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0011 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR PORTIONS 1092 AND 1145 (6 AND 4) BERRIMAH ROAD TOWN OF BAGOT FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING A SHOP, RESTAURANT, 26 MOTEL SUITES, 20 X 2 BEDROOM SERVICED APARTMENTS (DUAL KEY) AND A CARETAKER’S RESIDENCE

BACKGROUND

Site

The subject sites are both 2140m2 and currently in a dilapidated state with vacated business premises existing towards the front boundary on both lots. Both sites also contain shed like structures to the rear of the property that are also in a similar state of disrepair. The surrounding character is predominantly LI (Light Industry), while directly opposite exists a large area of GI (General Industry). Existing land uses reflect the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions for such zones.

Access to the subject sites is from existing crossovers on the Berrimah service road, which runs parallel to Berrimah road. The sites are relatively flat with vegetation consisting of overgrown grass and a few scattered trees. No easements are listed for either site.

DISCUSSION

The applicant has met with City of Darwin’s Infrastructure Department to discuss crossover and stormwater requirements. In relation to the on-street car parking bays, Council has recently approved the construction of 27 car parking bays in its Winnellie road reserve for a development associated with lots 5301, 5302, 5303 and 5304. The letter to the Authority advises that Council approves the on-street car parking bays in principle, subject to similar conditions that were imposed for the Winnellie Road car parking bays.

Car parking bays

The applicant’s plans generate a requirement of 63 car parking bays and a total of 69 bays are proposed, 11 of which are provided by the proposed reconfiguration of the existing parking arrangement within the adjacent Northern Territory Government road reserve.

Should the Development Consent Authority approve the reconfiguration of the car parking bays within the Northern Territory Government road reserve, Council requests that the Authority ensure the bays are available to the general public and not set aside or reserved for the proposed development on lots 1092 and 1145. In the event that this request is satisfied, then a contribution is to be made to Council in lieu of the on-site parking shortfall.

139 140

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0011 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR PORTIONS 1092 AND 1145 (6 AND 4) BERRIMAH ROAD TOWN OF BAGOT FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING A SHOP, RESTAURANT, 26 MOTEL SUITES, 20 X 2 BEDROOM SERVICED APARTMENTS (DUAL KEY) AND A CARETAKER’S RESIDENCE

Traffic Study

Council requires that a traffic study (which includes vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists) in accordance with Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 12: Traffic Impacts of Development, be undertaken by a suitably qualified traffic engineer on the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding road network and that this be submitted for approval of the General Manager Infrastructure, Darwin City Council. The study is to specifically address:

1) The potential impact on the Berrimah Road/Stuart Highway intersection and;

2) The access/egress points from the Berrimah Service Road to Berrimah Road.

Consolidation

The response letter notes that in order to facilitate the proposed development, allotments 1092 and 1145 must first be consolidated prior to any building works commencing. Council will not support any development until such time the aforementioned parcels are consolidated into a single lot or the necessary easements are created.

Waste Management

The response letter asks the Authority require a Waste Management Plan demonstrating waste disposal, storage and removal in accordance with Council’s Waste Management Policy 054. The applicant’s plans lack the necessary detail to demonstrate adequate waste management.

Aircraft Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF)

The response letter notes that any future development that is proposed within 20 ANEF contour is discretionary, meaning that approval may be granted if appropriate noise control features can be incorporated in the construction of any future residential buildings. Council requests that the Development Consent Authority seek confirmation that the proposed development will utilise appropriate acoustic measures during construction as indicated in the applicant’s plans.

Conclusion

The application is generally consistent with the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions and will service a somewhat niche market, given its location on Darwin’s periphery. Motels are a discretionary use in Zone C (Commercial) and the applicant proposes a development that is sensitive to the existing area. The potential noise disturbances from traffic utilising the Stuart Highway and Berrimah Road and the site’s location within the ANEF 20 guidelines are addressed in the applicant’s plans. Given that the focus of the proposed motel will be short term accommodation for clientele conducting business within the Berrimah vicinity, the development is offering an unprecedented service. Furthermore, the proposed motel will likely rejuvenate two

140 141

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0011 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR PORTIONS 1092 AND 1145 (6 AND 4) BERRIMAH ROAD TOWN OF BAGOT FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING A SHOP, RESTAURANT, 26 MOTEL SUITES, 20 X 2 BEDROOM SERVICED APARTMENTS (DUAL KEY) AND A CARETAKER’S RESIDENCE

dilapidated sites that are currently unused and contribute to the economic prosperity of the surrounding businesses.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Council’s Infrastructure Department

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

Potential Car Parking Shortfall Contribution

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We the Presenter and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

DROSSO LELEKIS LUCCIO CERCARELLI MANAGER DESIGN, GENERAL MANAGER PLANNING & PROJECTS INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected]

141 142

142 143

143 144

144 145

145 146

146 147

147 148

148 149

149 150

150 151

151 152

152 153

153 154

154 155

155 156

156 157

157 158

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/15 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

Report Number 12TS0014 attached

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/15 158 159

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.6

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS; 2193 (79) SMITH STREET, 2194 (81) SMITH STREET; 2197 (6) BRIGGS STREET AND 2203 (3) MOTT COURT, TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 186 MOTEL SUBJECT: SUITES, RESTAURANT AND A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE IN AN 11 STOREY BUILDING AND 90 X 1 BEDROOM AND 20 X 2 BEDROOM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN A 13 STOREY BUILDING PLUS 2 LEVELS OF BASEMENT PARKING - PA2011/0956.

REPORT NO. 12TS0014 CR:fh COMMON NO. 2161193 DATE: 31/01/2012

Presenter: Drosso Lelekis

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application for Lots; 2193 (79) Smith Street, 2194 (81) Smith Street; 2197 (6) Briggs Street and 2203 (3) Mott Court, Town of Darwin (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

KEY ISSUES:

 Traffic Management Plan  Porte-cochère over Public Land  Awnings over Public Land  Stormwater and Waste Management  Consolidation of Lots  Volumetric Controls in Central Darwin – NT Planning Scheme  Private Open Space  Parking Shortfall Contribution including the loss of on-street parking along Smith Street  Stormwater Upgrade – Financial Contribution

159 160

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0014 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS; 2193 (79) SMITH STREET, 2194 (81) SMITH STREET; 2197 (6) BRIGGS STREET AND 2203 (3) MOTT COURT, TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 186 MOTEL SUITES, RESTAURANT AND A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE IN AN 11 STOREY BUILDING AND 90 X 1 BEDROOM AND 20 X 2 BEDROOM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN A 13 STOREY BUILDING PLUS 2 LEVELS OF BASEMENT PARKING - PA2011/0956.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0014 CR:fh entitled Development Application for Lots; 2193 (79) Smith Street, 2194 (81) Smith Street; 2197 (6) Briggs Street and 2203 (3) Mott Court, Town Of Darwin, for 186 Motel Suites, Restaurant and a Caretaker's Residence in an 11 Storey Building and 90 X 1 Bedroom and 20 X 2 Bedroom Multiple Dwellings in a 13 Storey Building Plus 2 Levels of Basement Parking - PA2011/0956, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment B to Report Number 12TS0014 CR:fh be endorsed.

BACKGROUND

Development Permit DP10/0209, issued 8 April 2010, approved a change of use of the 10 storey tower from office to 131 motel suites, on lot 2194 and the replacement of the 3 storey part of the existing building, with grade car parking. Two levels of basement car parking under the 3 storey building on lot 2193 and extending the cartilage to the rear of the 10 storey building were also approved.

Development Permit DP11/0443, issued 27 July 2011, approved a change of use of the 10 storey tower from office to 134 motel suites on lot 2194 and the demolition of the 3 storey part of the existing building on lot 2193. The approved building on lot 2193 comprised two basement car parking levels, 4 parking storeys above ground level, and offices for the remaining 12 storeys plus ground level.

Council supported both applications but highlighted issues that were subsequently addressed within Development Permits DP10/0209 and DP11/0443.

This proposal is :

 to change the use of the existing 10 storey tower and 3 storey building on Lots 2193 and 2194 from offices to motel and ancillary purposes; and

 to construct a new 13 storey tower building (plus two basement parking levels) for multiple dwellings on Lots 2197 and 2203.

DISCUSSION

Volumetric Controls in Central Darwin

Council notes the proposed variation to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions in relation clause 6.3.2 – Volumetric Controls in Central Darwin.

1) Tier 2 setbacks require that the tower be setback a minimum of 6m from the site boundary and that there is a minimum of 12m between towers on the same site.

160 161

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0014 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS; 2193 (79) SMITH STREET, 2194 (81) SMITH STREET; 2197 (6) BRIGGS STREET AND 2203 (3) MOTT COURT, TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 186 MOTEL SUITES, RESTAURANT AND A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE IN AN 11 STOREY BUILDING AND 90 X 1 BEDROOM AND 20 X 2 BEDROOM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN A 13 STOREY BUILDING PLUS 2 LEVELS OF BASEMENT PARKING - PA2011/0956.

The applicant proposes a nil setback to Briggs Street and a 6m setback between the buildings at Tier 2.

2) Tier 2 Dimensions require that the maximum length of each side of the proposed tier does not exceed 75% of the length of the adjacent boundary. The applicant proposes a tier 2 construction that exceeds this requirement.

The proposed Tier 2 setback is less than what is required by the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions and the applicant has requested a variation be granted.

While Council does not necessarily support variations to the volumetric controls, in this instance it does not object as existing development permits allow a variation to setbacks.

Traffic Management

Notwithstanding the submitted traffic study, Council requests that should the Development Consent Authority approve this application that it include as a condition precedent that no works on site shall commence until the traffic study and required measures have been approved, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure, Darwin City Council.

Any resulting works will be in accordance with Council’s requirements and constructed at the applicant's expense.

Awnings

Notwithstanding any approved plans, any proposed awning is subject to Council’s approval and shall meet all Council’s requirements to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Infrastructure, Darwin City Council and at no cost to Council.

Waste Management

Council requests the Authority require the applicant submit a Waste Management Plan demonstrating waste disposal, storage and removal in accordance with Council’s Waste Management Policy 054. The applicant’s plans fail to demonstrate adequate waste management.

Porte-cochère

Notwithstanding the previous application in which Council approved the porte-cochère in principle, Council requests that the Authority require the applicant to submit the final design concept to Council for approval, to the satisfaction of General Manager Infrastructure Darwin City Council, prior to works commencing.

Additionally, in accordance with the General Conditions of DP10/2009 a monetary contribution shall be made to Darwin City Council with respect to the on-street car parking bays on Smith Street that will be lost as a result of the development.

161 162

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0014 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS; 2193 (79) SMITH STREET, 2194 (81) SMITH STREET; 2197 (6) BRIGGS STREET AND 2203 (3) MOTT COURT, TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 186 MOTEL SUITES, RESTAURANT AND A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE IN AN 11 STOREY BUILDING AND 90 X 1 BEDROOM AND 20 X 2 BEDROOM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN A 13 STOREY BUILDING PLUS 2 LEVELS OF BASEMENT PARKING - PA2011/0956.

Consolidation of Lots

Council notes that in order to facilitate the proposed development, allotments 2193, 2194, 2197 and 2203 must first be consolidated or, alternatively, plans be submitted demonstrating the location of mandatory access easements for each individual lot.

Council will not support any development until such time the aforementioned parcels are consolidated into a single lot or the necessary access easements are created.

Private Open Space

Council notes a variation to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions in relation to clause 7.5 – Private Open Space. The applicant proposes balconies of 8.4m2 for the 1 bedroom dwellings, thus failing to satisfy the required the required 12m2. While Council does not normally support reductions in private open space requirements, in this instance the balconies are considered proportionate to the dwellings they service and as such, do not object.

Stormwater

In addition to Council’s normal stormwater requirements, it was requested that the stormwater management plan also demonstrate how sediment and waste water generated during the construction phase will be managed to prevent entering the road reserve and contaminating the stormwater system.

Parking Shortfall Contribution

In addition to the monetary contribution required as a result of the loss of on-street parking incurred as a result of the porte-cochere construction, Council requests the Authority require a monetary contribution is paid to Council in accordance with its Carparking Contribution Plan, in lieu of the on-site car parking shortfall as a result of this development. The NT Planning Scheme requires 210 car parking spaces and only 209 are provided on site.

Stormwater Contribution

Council requests the Authority require a monetary contribution is paid to Council in accordance with its Stormwater Contribution Plan to upgrade stormwater infrastructure as a result of this development. The site falls within the developer Contributions Plan for Stormwater Drainage Works – Contributions Area Zone E and F. The applicant will be required to pay Council a contribution towards stormwater drainage works in accordance with the above plan.

162 163

PAGE: 5 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0014 CR:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR LOTS; 2193 (79) SMITH STREET, 2194 (81) SMITH STREET; 2197 (6) BRIGGS STREET AND 2203 (3) MOTT COURT, TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 186 MOTEL SUITES, RESTAURANT AND A CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE IN AN 11 STOREY BUILDING AND 90 X 1 BEDROOM AND 20 X 2 BEDROOM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN A 13 STOREY BUILDING PLUS 2 LEVELS OF BASEMENT PARKING - PA2011/0956.

Summary

The application seeks a variation to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions for clause 6.3.2 - Volumetric Controls in Central Darwin. While Council does not necessarily support setback variations, in this instance it does not object.

The appended traffic study is subject to approval by General Manager Infrastructure and the required contribution for the loss of on-street parking associated with the construction of the Porte-cochère has been included as a condition precedent on DP11/0443. The reduction in private open space requirements evident in the balconies of the 1 bedroom dwellings still represents a functional space. The proposed communal open space and the proximity to services that the Darwin CBD offers more than compensate for this minor variation.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Council’s Infrastructure Department.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

CBD Car parking shortfall, loss of on-street parking from the porte-cochere on Smith Street and Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrade contributions.

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We the Presenter and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

DROSSO LELEKIS LUCCIO CERCARELLI MANAGER DESIGN, GENERAL MANAGER PLANNING & PROJECTS INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected]

163 164

164 165

165 166

166 167

167 168

168 169

169 170

170 171

171 172

172 173

173 174

174 175

175 176

176 177

177 178

178 179

179 180

180 181

181 182

182 183

183 184

184 185

185 186

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/16 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.7 Development Application for Lot 4687 (38) Gothenburg Crescent Town of Darwin - Response to the Deferral Decision - 11 x 2 bedroom Units in a 4 Storey Building with Ground Level Car Parking - PA2011/0660 Report No. 12TS0015 (21/01/12) Common No. 2090196

Report Number 12TS0015 attached

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/16 186 187

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.7

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AMENDED PLANS AND INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO THE DEFERRAL DECISION FOR LOT 4687 (38) SUBJECT: GOTHENBURG CRESCENT TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 11 X 2 BEDROOM UNITS IN A 4 STOREY BUILDING WITH GROUND LEVEL CAR PARKING - PA2011/0660

REPORT NO. 12TS0015 JS:fh COMMON NO. 2090196 DATE: 21/01/2012

Presenter: Joseph Sheridan

Approved: Luccio Cercarelli

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to refer to Council for comment, pursuant to Section 48 of the Planning Act, the following Development Application Amended Plans and Information in Response to the Deferral Decision for Lot 4687 (38) Gothenburg Crescent Town of Darwin (Attachment A). The following report addresses relevant Council issues and recommends that Council endorse comments provided to the Development Consent Authority by staff

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

KEY ISSUES:

 Dwelling Density and Height  Communal Open Space  Setbacks  Traffic

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. THAT Report Number 12TS0015 JS:fh entitled Development Application Amended Plans and Information in Response to the Deferral Decision for Lot 4687 (38) Gothenburg Crescent Town of Darwin for 11 X 2 Bedroom Units in a 4 Storey Building with Ground Level Car Parking - PA2011/0660, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council endorse the letter to the Development Consent Authority in Attachment D to Report Number 12TS0015 JS:fh be endorsed.

187 188

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0015 JS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AMENDED PLANS AND INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO THE DEFERRAL DECISION FOR LOT 4687 (38) GOTHENBURG CRESCENT TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 11 X 2 BEDROOM UNITS IN A 4 STOREY BUILDING WITH GROUND LEVEL CAR PARKING - PA2011/0660

BACKGROUND

Lots 4687, 4686 and 5291 were approved for rezoning from MD (Multiple Dwelling Residential) to MR (Medium Density Residential) by the Honourable Gerald Francis McCarthy, Minister for Lands and Planning on 19 May 2011.

The allotments were identified as suitable for medium density development to help meet the demand for residential infill development close to the Darwin CBD, services and public transport. The rezoning of the subject site was deemed to have a minimal impact on neighbouring properties due to the topographic characteristics of the land and was not perceived to create potential traffic and parking problems on Gothenburg Crescent.

Council supported the rezoning on the basis that the subject site was in close proximity to major transport routes and services such as the CBD and Dinah Beach Oval.

The applicant’s original development plans for 11 x 2 bedroom units in a 4 storey building with ground level parking were referred to this office 15 September 2011. The response letter to the Authority lodged a submission under Section 49 of the Planning Act, in which Council objected to the granting of a Development Permit for the same aforementioned key issues.

The applicant then submitted a revised development application referred to this office 16 November 2011 in which the original issues that Council raised were not addressed. Consequently, the response letter to the Authority again lodged a submission under Section 49 of the Planning Act, in which Council objected to the granting of a Development Permit for the same aforementioned key issues.

It is noted that the conditions identified by the Development Consent Authority in the Deferral Notice (Attachment B) at its meeting on 2 December 2011 did not address any issues raised by Council. The basis of Council’s objections were centred on the applicant’s proposal to vary the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions for Residential Density and Height Limitations that would result in an overdevelopment of the site.

The application referred to this office 6 January 2011, specifically addresses the conditions that could potentially facilitate a variation to clause 7.1.1 – Residential Density and Height Limitations as outlined the Deferral Notice. Notwithstanding the amended proposal, Council’s original issues that warranted an objection to the granting of a Development Permit, have not been rectified.

DISCUSSION

Dwelling Density and Height

Attachment C of this report, is the original response to the most recent correspondence from the Development Assessment Services. This letter was then revised at Attachment D to this report. Council notes a number of variations in relation to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions in Table A to Clause 7.1 – Residential

188 189

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0015 JS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AMENDED PLANS AND INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO THE DEFERRAL DECISION FOR LOT 4687 (38) GOTHENBURG CRESCENT TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 11 X 2 BEDROOM UNITS IN A 4 STOREY BUILDING WITH GROUND LEVEL CAR PARKING - PA2011/0660

Density and Height Limitations. Under the Northern Territory Planning Scheme’s provisions for Dwelling Density within the MR zone, a maximum of 4 storeys with one, 2 bedroom dwelling per 85m2 is permitted. The proposal provides one, 2 bedroom dwelling per 65m2 in a 5 storey complex, a substantial increase in the prescribed density for that zone.

Whilst the basement level is predominantly recessed into the escarpment it does present as another storey from the Gothenburg Crescent, street view and the addition of a fifth level contributes to the proposal exceeding the planning scheme density requirements. Therefore, Council does not support the proposed height or density variation.

Communal Open Space

Council notes a variation to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions in relation to Clause 7.6 - Communal Open Space. Sub-clause 2 requires a minimum of 15% of the site, being not less than 6m wide at any point be provided for Communal Open Space.

The proposed plans provide 16.35% but do not allow for the required minimum 6m width for a portion of the proposed Communal Open Space. Notwithstanding the slight variation to sub-clause 2, the adjacent Dinah Beach Oval provides a significant area of Communal Open Space and is available for leisure and organised recreation, and therefore Council does not object.

Setbacks

Council notes a number of variations to the Northern Territory Planning Scheme provisions in relation to Table B of Clause 7.3 – Minimum Building Setbacks for Residential Buildings Over Two Storeys in Height and Associated Open Structures and Clause 7.3.1 – Additional Setback Requirements for Residential Buildings Longer Than 18m or Taller than 4 Storeys.

While Council does not necessarily support the variations to Table B of Clause 7.3 and Clause 7.3.1, the existing site topography will lesson any impact of the proposed reduced setbacks and therefore does not object.

Traffic

Council understands that proposed upgrades to Tiger Brennan Drive may result in changes to the Gothenburg Crescent and Tiger Brennan Drive intersection. The most likely outcome would be a left-out only restricted access from Gothenburg Crescent onto Tiger Brennan Drive, which effectively would redirect city bound traffic from Gothenburg Crescent through the Stuart Park local road network. Council does not support any variation to the density of the approved MR zone which may contribute to an increase in traffic which will be redirected through Stuart Park in the future.

189 190

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12TS0015 JS:fh SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AMENDED PLANS AND INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO THE DEFERRAL DECISION FOR LOT 4687 (38) GOTHENBURG CRESCENT TOWN OF DARWIN - PROPOSAL:- 11 X 2 BEDROOM UNITS IN A 4 STOREY BUILDING WITH GROUND LEVEL CAR PARKING - PA2011/0660

Summary

Notwithstanding the amended proposal, Council’s original issues have not been rectified and hence, the response letter to the Authority reiterates Council’s objection to the granting of a Development Permit.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Council’s Infrastructure Department

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER - DECLARATION OF INTEREST

We, the Presenter and Approving Officers, declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

JOSEPH SHERIDAN LUCCIO CERCARELLI GENERAL MANAGER GRADUATE TOWN PLANNER INFRASTRUCTURE

Any queries on this report can be directed to Cindy Robson on 8930 0528 or email [email protected]

190 191

191 192

192 193

193 194

194 195

195 196

196 197

197 198

198 199

199 200

200 201

201 202

202 203

203 204

204 205

205 206

206 207

207 208

208 209

209 210

210 211

211 212

212 213

213 214

214 215

215 216

216 217

217 218

218 219

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/17 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.8 Second Quarter Budget Review 2011/2012 Report No. 12A0002 (20/01/12) Common No. 978289

Report Number 12A0002 attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/17 219 220

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.8

SECOND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12

REPORT No. 12A0002 COMMON No. 978289 Date: 20/01/2012

Presenter: Kelly Stidworthy

Approved: Frank Crawley

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to provide information on program budgets requiring variation due to amendments to Council activities and actual income and expenditure differing from the budgeted amounts. Budget variations require Council to vary the estimates in accordance with Section 128 of the Local Government Act and Section 13 of the Local Government (Accounting) Regulations.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

Issues addressed in this Report are in accordance with the following Goals/Strategies of the Darwin City Council 2008 – 2012 as outlined in the ‘Evolving Darwin Strategic Directions: Towards 2020 and Beyond’:- Goal 7 Demonstrate Effective, Open and Responsible Governance Outcome 7.1 Effective governance Key Strategies 7.1.3 Manage Council’s affairs based on a sustainable financial strategy

KEY ISSUES

Budget Variations A summary of all variation requests can be found in the Attachment comprising:

1. Attachment A – Recurrent Budget Variations – with identified funding 2. Attachment B – Capital Budget Variations – with identified funding 3. Attachment C – Recurrent Budget Variation – with unidentified funding 4. Attachment D – Capital Budget Variations – with unidentified funding

Variations $10,000 or over are detailed in the following report. Variations under $10,000 are listed in the attachment only.

RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT it be a recommendation to Council:-

A. THAT Report Number 12A0002 entitled Second Quarter Budget Review 2011/12, be received and noted.

B. THAT Attachment A, B, C & D of Report Number 12A0002 entitled Second Quarter Budget Review 2011/12 be presented to Council for adoption.

220 221

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12A0002 SUBJECT: SECOND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12

BACKGROUND

N/A

DISCUSSION

Funding Transfers (net effect on budget is nil): Amount Description $526,587 Shoal Bay waste cell construction operating component; funded from Waste Management Reserve $239,762 Shoal Bay de-leaching well and waste cell construction; funded from Waste Management Reserve $235,469 Income received for payout of existing copying/printing contract; offset by expenditure allocation to pay out contract $180,357 Grant funding received for Healthy Communities initiative; offset by expenditure allocation on project $106,754 Grants & donations received for 70th Anniversary of Bombing of Darwin; offset by increased expenditure allocation on project $107,000 Transfer of budget for community safety program to reflect where actual costs are being incurred $120,000 Stott Lane Carpark extension; project not going ahead transfer of funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve ($70,000) and de- recognition of contribution income not received ($50,000) $100,000 Additional NTG special purpose grant funding for Darwin Entertainment Centre; paid directly to DEC $100,000 Westlane Stormwater Drainage Upgrade; project not going ahead transfer of funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve $95,000 Legal costs for Chinatown; funded from On & Offstreet Parking Reserve $72,059 Transfer to driveway replacement program from footpath construction program $40,000 LATM program; transfer funding from Parap Service Rd to Gilbert St as project deferred $40,000 LATM program; de-recognition of funding for Parap Service Rd project as funding application was unsuccessful $37,000 Bicentennial Park Masterplan; funded from savings within the capital expenditure budget $35,000 Water feature in Mall; funded from savings within the recreational facilities maintenance budget $30,000 Transfer of budget from ‘printer replacement’ capital expenditure program to operating budget to cover new copying/printing contract; existing printers have moved to a lease arrangement $29,396 Library operating subsidy; increase in grant funding not budgeted for offset by increased expenditure allocation $28,641 Allocate budget for Pett St driveways replacement from within driveway replacement program

221 222

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12A0002 SUBJECT: SECOND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12

$25,204 Grant funding received for Stuart Park Child Care Centre; offset by capital expenditure allocation $20,580 Transfer funding for asbestos management program from capital expenditure budget to operating budget to reflect actual costs incurred $13,526 Shoal Bay Network Connection ($1,790) and Shoal Bay Road Access Upgrade ($11,736); funded from Waste Management Reserve $11,000 Recognition of additional recovered legal fees; offset by an increase in legal fees expenditure

Increase in Income (not offset): Amount Description $90,459 Income received for use of Council verge and parking bays $67,245 Handover approval fee for Stage 1 of Muirhead Development $27,069 Berrimah Business Park development approval fee

Decrease in Expense (not offset): Amount Description $60,000 Malak Hall Airconditioning program; savings as project completed

Increase in Expense (not offset): Amount Description $65,286 Increase licensing costs for ECM; additional 50 users $17,236 Darwin Festival in-kind support as per Council Decision 20\4494

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Relevant officers responsible for budgets.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

Council’s original 2011/12 budget is based on a nil surplus carried forward from 2010/11.

As part of the 2011/12 budget process and adoption of the 2011/12 Municipal Plan, Council adopted the agreed level of services and projects to be delivered in the 2011/12 Financial Year.

Proposed variations in the Second Quarter Budget Review 2011/12 result in no net effect on surplus.

Net funding from cash backed reserves of $563,958 is required to fund all variations.

222 223

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12A0002 SUBJECT: SECOND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12

The variations propose the following transfers to and from Reserves:

Transfers from Reserves Amount Description $526,587 Shoal Bay waste cell construction operating component; funded from Waste Management Reserve $239,762 Shoal Bay de-leaching well and waste cell construction; funded from Waste Management Reserve $95,000 Legal costs for Chinatown; funded from On & Offstreet Parking Reserve $13,526 Shoal Bay Network Connection ($1,790) and Shoal Bay Road Access Upgrade ($11,736); funded from Waste Management Reserve

Transfers to Reserves Amount Description $140,917 Transfer net savings to Asset Refurbishment Reserve $100,000 Westlane Stormwater Drainage Upgrade; project not going ahead transfer of funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve $70,000 Stott Lane Carpark extension; project not going ahead transfer of funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

Adoption of the recommendations in this report will result in Council varying the budget in accordance with Section 128 of the Local Government Act.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

N/A

COUNCIL OFFICER CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

We the Author and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

KELLY STIDWORTHY FRANK CRAWLEY MANAGER FINANCE GENERAL MANAGER CORPORATE SERVICES

Any queries on this report may be directed to Kelly Stidworthy on 8930 0523 or [email protected]

223 224 Summary 2nd Quarter Budget Variations 2011/12

Budget Variations Variation $ Recurrent Funded - Attachment A $ 15,580 Capital Funded- Attachment B $ (15,580) Recurrent - Attachment C $ (102,251) Recurrent - Attachment D $ 102,251 Total $ -

BUDGET VARIATION FUNDING

Budgeted Surplus/Deficit 01/07/2011 $ -

1st Quarter Budget Variations $ - 2nd Quarter Budget Variations $ -

Total 2011/12 (Surplus)/Deficit after funding Variations $ -

RESERVE FUNDING Transfer Out Transfer In

Waste Management Reserve$ 779,875 On & Offstreet Carparking Reserve$ 95,000 $ 170,000 Asset Maintenance & Refurbishment Reserve$ 140,917 Total Reserve Transfers$ 874,875 $ 310,917

CONTRIBUTIONS, GRANT & SUBSIDY FUNDING Increase Decrease Department Chief Minister - Bombing of Darwin 70th Anniversary$ 100,000 RSL - Bombing of Darwin$ 6,364 Project Employment $ 1,273 Healthy Communities $ 180,357 Stott Lane Carpark Extension contribution$ 50,000 NRETAS - Darwin Entertainment Centre$ 100,000 NRETAS - Library Operational Grant$ 29,396 NTG -Stuart Park Child Care Centre $ 25,204 LATM $ 40,000 Office Youth Affairs - Make and Create Youth Vibe Holiday activity$ 200 Total Grant Funds $ 442,794 $ 90,000

224

2ND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12 225 ATTACHMENT A - RECURRENT BUDGET VARIATIONS 2011/12 - WITH IDENTIFIED FUNDING

Request Council Department Number Project Name Decision Budget Number Revenue Reserve Subsidies Summary 2nd Quarter Budget Variations 2011/12 CEO

Communications & Marketing 5 70th Anniversary Bombing of Darwin grant funding (Chief Minister's Dept) 05/130030/750/739 -100,000

70th Anniversary Bombing of Darwin grant funding (RSL) 05/130030/750/739 -6,364

70th Anniversary Bombing of Darwin donation for Plaque WW11 Civilian Memorial Wall 05/130030/750/739 -260

70th Anniversary Bombing of Darwin donation (N Chin) 05/130030/750/739 -130

Increased expenditure allocation for 70th Anniversiary Bombing of Darwin 05/130004/300/104 106,754 CEO Total 00 0

Community & Cultural Services

GM Community & Cultural Services 2 Additional NTG special purpose grant funding for Darwin Entertainment Centre 05/210001/300/320 100,000

05/210031/750/733 -100,000

Community Development 11 Income received for annual banner site at Gardens Oval 05/221030/700/719 -1,667

05/221000/300/100 1,667

9a Transfer of Community Safety program to reflect where actual costs are being incurred 05/221040/300/100 -107,000

9b Youth Activities grant funding (Office of Youth Affairs for Make and Create Dec/Jan Youth Vibe) 05/222031/750/739 -200

05/222010/300/104 200

9a Transfer of Community Safety program to reflect where actual costs are being incurred Community & Cultural Services 05/221007/300/100 107,000

12 Healthy Communities grant funding (Commonwealth Gov't) 05/223030/750/739 -180,357

05/223040/300/104 180,357

Libraries 6 Wage subsidy received from project employment for libraries 05/235030/750/739 -1,273

05/231000/300/001 1,273

10 Library Operating Subsidy (NTG) 05/235030/750/771 -29,396

05/235000/300/100 29,396 Community & Cultural Services Total 00 0

Corporate Services

GM Corporate Services 14 Income and offsetting expenditure for recovered legal fees 05/410035/700/701 -11,000

05/410006/300/325 11,000

Information Technology 3 Income and offsetting expenditure for payout of copying/printing contract 05/431030/700/719 -235,469

05/431040/300/100 235,469

27 Transfer of funding from capital to operating budget for new copying/printing contract 05/431000/300/301 30,000

Business Services 7 Legal costs for Chinatown; funded from On & Offstreet Parking Reserve 05/421410/451/499 -95,000

05/410006/300/325 95,000 Corporate Services Total 30,000 0 0

Infrastructure

Transfer funding for asbestos management program from capital to operating budget to reflect actual costs 15 incurred Building Services 05/332026/150/104 20,580

24 Water feature in Mall funded from savings in recreational facilities maintenance budget 05/332007/150/105 -35,000

Development & Waste Management 23 Shoal Bay Waste waste cell construction operating component; 05/421408/451/499 -526,587 funded from the Waste Management Reserve

05/333000/180/105 526,587 Infrastructure Total -14,420 0 0

Grand Total 15,580 0 0 225 2ND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12 226

ATTACHMENT B - CAPITAL BUDGET VARIATIONS 2011/12 - WITH IDENTIFIED FUNDING

Request Council Department Number Project Name Decision Budget Number Revenue Reserve Subsidies Summary 2nd Quarter Budget Variations 2011/12 Corporate Services

On & Off Street Parking 29 Stott Lane Carpark program not proceeding 05/453065/180/105 -70,000 -50,000

De-recognition of contribution funding not received 05/453037/750/799 50,000

Transfer remaining funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve 05/421410/451/499 70,000

Information Technology 27 Transfer of funding from capital to operating budget for new copying/printing contract 05/431060/180/100 -30,000 Corporate Services Total -30,000 0 0

Infrastructure

GM Infrastructure 24 Water feature in Mall funded from savings in recreational facilities maintenance budget 05/311060/180/104 35,000

Parks & Reserves 8 Bicentennial Park Masterplan; funded from savings within the capital expenditure budget 05/341060/180/104 37,000

Cityworks 8 Walkway Resurfacing program; transfer savings to Bicentennial Park Masterplan 05/334065/180/100 -10,000

16 Westlane Stormwater drainage upgrade; transfer funding back to On & Off Street Parking Reserve 05/421410/451/499 100,000 as project not going ahead

05/334060/180/104 -100,000

30a Transfer to driveway replacement program from footpath construction program 05/331061/180/105 -72,059

Building Services 28 Grant funding received for Stuart Park Child Care Centre; offset by capital expenditure allocation 05/332030/750/739 -25,204

05/332085/180/105 25,204

Transfer funding for asbestos management program from capital to operating budget to reflect actual costs incurred 15 05/332064/180/104 -20,580

8 Malak Hall Airconditioning program; transfer savings to Bicentennial Park Masterplan 05/332085/180/100 -20,000

Design & Planning & Projects 8 Lighting in Parks program; transfer savings to Bicentennial Park Masterplan 05/331067/180/104 -7,000

LATM program; Parap Service Rd project deferred due to unsuccessful grant application 05/322067/180/105 -40,000 -40,000

25 LATM program; de-recognition of funding for Parap Service Rd project as funding application unsuccessful 05/322031/750/781 40,000

LATM program; transfer funding from Parap Service Rd to Gilbert St as project deferred 05/322067/180/105 40,000

Development & Waste Management 17 Shoal Bay Network Connection ($1,790) and Shoal Bay Road Access Upgrade ($11,736); funded from Waste 05/421408/451/499 -13,526 Management Reserve

05/333060/180/100 13,526

30a Transfer to driveway replacement program from footpath construction program 05/331064/180/105 72,059

30b Allocate budget for Pett St driveway replacements from within driveway replacement program 05/331064/180/105 28,641

05/331064/180/105 -28,641

31 Shoal Bay deleaching well and waste cell construction; funded from Waste Management Reserve 05/421408/451/499 -239,762

05/333060/180/100 239,762 Infrastructure Total 14,420 0 0

Grand Total -15,580 0 0

226 2ND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12 227

ATTACHMENT C - RECURRENT BUDGET VARIATIONS 2011/12 - REQUIRING FUNDING

Request Council Department Number Project Name Decision Budget Number Revenue Reserve Subsidies Summary 2nd Quarter Budget Variations 2011/12 Corporate Services

Information Technology 4 Increase licensing cost for ECM; additional 50 users 05/431002/300/100 65,286

Corporate Services Total 65,286 0 0

Community & Cultural Services

Darwin Festival additional in kind support as per Council Decision: $30k approved, $17,236 required only Community Development 9c 20\4494 05/221004/321/104 17,236 as per actual expenditure

Community & Cultural Services Total 17,236 0 0

Infrastructure

26a Income received for use of Council verge and parking bays 05/321033/550/551 -90,459 Development & Waste Management

26b Berrimah Business Park Development approval fee 05/321035/550/551 -27,069

26c Handover approval fee for Stage 1 of Muirhead Development 05/321035/550/551 -67,245

Infrastructure Total -184,773 0 0

Grand Total -102,251 0 0

227 2ND QUARTER BUDGET REVIEW 2011/12 228

ATTACHMENT D - CAPITAL BUDGET VARIATIONS 2011/12 - REQUIRING FUNDING

Request Council Department Number Project Name Decision Budget Number Revenue Reserve Subsidies Summary 2nd Quarter Budget Variations 2011/12 Corporate Services

Finance 32 Transfer net savings to Asset Refurbishment Reserve 05/421412/451/499 140,917

Corporate Services Total 0 140,917 0

Community & Cultural Services

Community & Cultural Services 20 Parap swimming pool works; additional funding required 05/221060/180/104 826

Community & Cultural Services Total 826 0 0

Infrastructure

Building Services 18 Malak Hall Airconditioning; savings as project completed 05/332085/180/105 -60,000

21 Civic Centre Airconditioning works; additional funding required 05/332087/180/104 890

30d Bishop St boom gate; additional funding required 05/332084/180/100 9,753

Parks & Reserves 22 Gardens Cemetery fencing; additional funding required 05/341065/180/100 1,426

Design & Planning & Projects 19 Westlane Carpark; additional funding required for cycle storage facility 05/322068/180/104 7,403

30c Roads Resealing Program; additional funding required 05/331065/180/105 1,036

Infrastructure Total -39,492 0 0

Grand Total -38,666 140,917 0

228 229

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/18 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.9 COTA Request for Funds for Spillet House Repairs Report No.12TC0003MB:as (25/01/12) Common No. 2156727

Report Number 12TC0003MB:as attached. .

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/18 229 230

2nd ORDINARY COUNCIL/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.9

COTA REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR SPILLET HOUSE REPAIRS

REPORT No. 12TC0003MB:as COMMON No. 2156727 Date: 25/01/12

Presenter: Mark Blackburn, Executive Manager

Approved: Brendan Dowd, Chief Executive Officer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to respond to a request by COTA for funds to repair Spillet House as it was damaged in Cyclone Carlos in February 2011.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

Goal 5 Facilitate and Maintain a Cohesive Community.

Outcome 5.1 Facilitate community access and inclusion.

Key Strategy 5.1.1 Create more opportunities for the community to access services and facilities.

KEY ISSUES

COTA has recently advised Council that it had been necessary to fund the costs of the repairs to Spillet House through its operational funding in order to provide a safe and secure facility for patrons and staff. This then has placed in jeopardy its capacity to fund all year round services which include advocacy, social and educational activities for the growing number of seniors residing in Darwin.

It is recommended that Council provide $5,000 towards its operational costs to ensure seniors are able to access services at COTA.

RECOMMENDATIONS

A THAT Report Number 12TC0003MB:as entitled, COTA request for funds for repairs to Spillet House, be received and noted.

B THAT Council provide a $5,000 contribution towards the operating costs of COATA to ensure that services continue to be provided for seniors for 2012.

230 231

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12TC0003MB:as SUBJECT: COTA REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR SPILLET HOUSE REPAIRS

BACKGROUND

Council has received a request from COTA to provide $5,000 towards the costs of the repairs to Spillet House following Cyclone Carlos. Attachment A

COTA (NT) is the Peak Body for seniors in the Territory and is dedicated to protecting and promoting the well being of Territorians aged 50 years and over and Indigenous Territorians aged 45 years and over

COTA’s mission is to empower older people, those who work with them, government and the community into achieving well-being and social justice for older people.

COTA is currently located in Spillet House at 65 Smith Street Darwin which is a very convenient location in the central business district. This location is a much valued place where seniors come and meet for social events, gain information and learn new skills.

DISCUSSION

Unfortunately, Spillet House received extensive damage in Cyclone Carlos in February 2011 and sought a financial contribution from Council to meet the costs of the repairs.

Spillet House is not a Council owned facility. The NT Government record of Administrative Interests and Information shows that Spillet House has a Crown Lease in perpetuity to the Darwin Pensioners and Senior Citizens Association Incorporated. It would not be financially sustainable for Council to contribute to the costs of repairs to buildings not owned by Council.

Council Officers recently contacted COTA and was advised that it had been necessary for COTA to fund the costs of the repairs to Spillet House through its operational funding in order to provide a safe and secure facility for patrons and staff. This has placed in jeopardy COTA’s capacity to fund all year round social and educational activities for the growing number of seniors residing in Darwin.

It is recommended that the Council provide $5,000 towards its operational costs to ensure seniors are able to access services at COTA. The source of funds will be identified at the 3rd quarter budget review.

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Chief Officers Group

231 232

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12TC0003MB:as SUBJECT: COTA REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR SPILLET HOUSE REPAIRS

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Policy 008 Community Services, Cultural and Social General

Council seeks to provide services, facilities and programs that are appropriate to the needs of its area and to ensure equitable access to its services, facilities and programs;

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

The source of funds will be identified at the 3rd quarter budget review.

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

Nil

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS Nil

COUNCIL OFFICER CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

We the Author and Approving Officers declare that we do not have a Conflict of Interest in relation to this matter.

MARK BLACKBURN BRENDAN DOWD EXECUTIVE MANAGER CHIEF EXEXCUTIVE OFFICER Any queries on this report may be directed Mark Blackburn on 89300 516 or [email protected]

232 233

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12TC0003MB:as SUBJECT: COTA REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR SPILLET HOUSE REPAIRS

Attachment A

From: Robyn Lesley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 6:27 PM To: Elected Members; Brendan Dowd; John Banks; Mark Blackburn; Frank Crawley Subject: FW: Seniors Program and Fundraiser

Hi all In August this year we commenced a fund raising campaign to raise funds to fix the damage to the roof of Spillett House following Cyclone Carlos. We have been able to raise $5000 from our members and there are a number of promises from the private sector. However we are still nearly $10,000 short. Requests to the NT Government have been unsuccessful. We are still living under tarpaulins and the risk of further damage increases daily as the wet season encroaches.

I am making a plea on behalf of COTA NT for the assistance of the Darwin City Council. If you were willing to assist in helping bridge the gap by providing $5,000, I am confident that the last $5,000 could be raised with a public appeal. Builders have agreed to commence the work on Monday with a deferred payment plan. An public appeal will be launched on Monday and your assistance in this work would be greatly appreciated. I would be happy to provide any information that you need in order to make a decision. However the best results would be to see for yourselves the condition under which we are managing to provide services to seniors within our community. We have our AGM on Monday at 1 pm. You are most welcome to attend. Regards Robyn Lesley

COTA NT 65 Smith Street Darwin NT 0800 GPO Box 852 Darwin NT 0801 P: 08 89 411 004 F: 08 89 415 011 M: 0438 411911 www.cotant.org.au

Confidentiality: This e-mail is from COTA. The contents are confidential and may be protected by legal professional privilege. The contents are intended only for the named recipient of this e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the information contained in the e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to us immediately and delete the document.

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

233 234

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/19 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.10 Proposed Child Care Centre at Lyons – Community Consultation Outcomes Report No. 12C002 NM:ez (31/01/12) Common No. 1977217

Report Number 12C002 NM:ez attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/19 234 235

2nd ORDINARY/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.10

PROPOSED CHILD CARE CENTRE AT LYONS – COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OUTCOMES

REPORT No. 12C002 NM:ez COMMON No. 1977217 Date: 31/1/12

Presenter:

Approved: John Banks, General Manager Community & Cultural Services

PURPOSE

This report presents the outcomes of community consultation regarding the proposed childcare centre at Lyons (Attachment A) and provides a recommendation for Council’s consideration.

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

Goal 1 Achieve Effective Partnerships and Engage in Collaborative Relationships Outcome 1.2 Effectively engage with community

KEY ISSUES

 A request has been received to purchase approximately 233m2 of Lot 9800, Garamanak Park, Lyons from Council to build a child care facility.  In September 2011 Council gave in principle support to the proposition.  Results from a community survey regarding the sale of a portion of Lot 9800 for the development of a childcare facility at Lyons were positive.

RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT it be a recommendation to Council:-

A. THAT Report Number 12C002 NM:ez Proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons – Community Consultation Outcomes, be received and noted.

B. THAT Council agree to the sale of a portion of Lot 9800 to assist with the development of a childcare facility at Lyons subject to the following conditions:

 That the sale of the land be conditional on the construction of a childcare facility. The transfer of land from Council will only occur once the facility is constructed.  That the developer replant vegetation within Lot 9800 adjacent to the area sold to replace vegetation lost with the sale of the land.  Satisfactory legal, commercial and other arrangements.  That all costs associated with the process be at the developer’s expense.  That the land will be sold at the market value as determined by an independent valuer, being the Australian Valuation Officers.

235 236

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12C002 NM:ez SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHILD CARE CENTRE AT LYONS - COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OUTCOMES

BACKGROUND

In September 2011 Council provided in principle support to a proposal from Lyons Development Corporation Limited to purchase part of Lot 9800 for the development of a child care centre on the adjoining Lot 9979. Council’s support was subject to various conditions including consideration of the outcomes of community consultation.

PREVIOUS DECISIONS

Decision No. 20\4440 (27/09/11)

A. That Report Number 11TS0003 CR:fh entitled Proposed Childcare Centre – Lyons be received and noted.

B. THAT Council advise the Lyons Development Corporation that:

 “In principle” support is provided to the proposal to purchase part of Lot 9800 subject to satisfactory arrangements being established on a range of issues identified in Report Number 11TS0003 CR:fh including community consultation, commercial and issues.  Council’s decision to sell will be subject to but not limited to the outcome of community consultation undertaken to Council’s satisfaction at the applicants cost.  The “in principle” support provided is not to be taken as a firm commitment and Council reserves the right to withdraw if a satisfactory arrangement can not be established.

C. THAT a further report be presented to Council detailing the outcomes of community consultation for Council’s consideration.

DISCUSSION

Lot 9979 (45) Damabila Drive, Lyons has been indentified as a potential childcare centre development for a number of years however earlier this year the developer indicated that the lot is not large enough to accommodate an adequate centre under the new National Childcare Guidelines. Therefore the developer is seeking to purchase approximately 233m2 of the adjoining land, Lot 9800, Garamanak Park, which has a total area of 5.7 hectares and is zoned Public Open Space.

Community Consultation

Community consultation regarding the proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons was conducted in line with Council’s Community Consultation Policy by Elton Consulting on behalf of Lyons Joint Venture.

The engagement process sought to provide clear and accurate information about the proposal and to obtain community feedback through a community survey which was

236 237

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12C002 NM:ez SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHILD CARE CENTRE AT LYONS - COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OUTCOMES

provided both online and in paper based format. The survey invited community feedback for a two week period from Monday 14 November to Tuesday 29 November. The survey was widely promoted through a letterbox drop to all homes at Lyons, advertisements in local print media, displays in Lyons Community Centre and Council’s libraries and on Council’s and Lyon’s websites.

Of the 15 people who took part in the Community Survey, 13 supported or strongly supported the proposal, one neither supported nor opposed the proposal and one strongly opposed the proposal.

The respondent who strongly opposed the proposal was concerned about the related loss of parkland, however several respondents commented on the small portion of parkland required to assist with development of the childcare centre facility.

Almost all respondents who supported the proposal commented on the need to address existing and likely future demand for childcare at Lyons and in the wider area.

Conclusion

There was a high level of support among respondents to the community survey regarding the sale of a portion of Lot 9800 for the development of a childcare facility at Lyons. Given that there is an existing and likely future demand for childcare facilities in the municipality and that there was only one respondent opposed to the sale, it is recommended that Council support the sale of a portion of Lot 9800, Lyons subject to the following conditions:

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Consultation has been undertaken with the local community in line with Council’s Community Consultation Policy.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

The proposal has been assessed in accordance with Council Land Disposal Policy and given that there is only one identified purchaser of a lot of this size it conforms to policy.

237 238

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12C002 NM:ez SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHILD CARE CENTRE AT LYONS - COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OUTCOMES

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

All costs associated with the sale will be at the developer’s expense.

Any sale of land will be at market value as determined by the Australian Valuation Office in accordance with the final intended use of the entire site.

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

The proposed childcare centre at Lyons will meet new regulations and satisfy community needs. Sale of a portion of Lot 9800 will be subject to satisfactory legal, commercial and other arrangements.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

One of the conditions of sale will be that the developer replants vegetation within Lot 9800, Lyons to replace vegetation lost with the sale of the parcel of land.

COUNCIL OFFICER CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

Nil.

NANCY MCCANN JOHN BANKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GENERAL MANAGER OFFICER COMMUNITY & CULTURAL SERVICES

Any queries on this report may be directed to John Banks on 89300633 or [email protected]

238 239

Client Report to Darwin City Council

Project Lyons – Proposed Childcare Centre Community Consultation Outcomes Report

Date Contact 1 December 2011 [email protected]

239 240

Prepared by Lucy Greig Reviewed by

Steve Rossiter

Date 1 December 2011

Job number 11/2664

Document name Consultation Outcomes Report

Version 0

This document is printed on paper produced using sustainable forestry practices and chlorine free pulp

240 241

Contents

1 Introduction 2 Appendices 1.1 Project background 2 Appendix A: Survey tool 1.2 Purpose and objectives 2 Appendix B: Flyer 2 Engagement overview 3 Appendix C: Newspaper advertisements 2.1 Engagement process 3 Appendix D: Poster Appendix E: Lyons webpage 3 Engagement outcomes 4 Appendix F: Full survey results 3.1 Respondent profile 4

3.2 How people found out about / completed the survey 4

3.3 Attitudes towards the proposal 4 3.4 Other comments and suggestions 5

4 Conclusions and next steps 6 5 Appendices 7

241 242

1 Introduction

This report has been prepared by independent community engagement firm Elton Consulting on behalf of the Lyons Joint Venture. It documents the community consultation process and outcomes for the proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons, and will be provided to Darwin City Council to help inform Council’s final determination on the proposal.

The community consultation process was conducted by Elton Consulting in line with Darwin City Council’s Community Consultation Policy. The consultation was designed as a Level 2 process to keep the community informed, listen to and acknowledge concerns and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision.

It is important to note that the feedback contained in this report:

• Cannot be construed as being statistically representative of opinion within the local community

• Will be one of a number of inputs considered by Council as part of its planning and decision making.

1.1 Project background

In the context of rising demand for childcare, increasing regulations and changes in the way care is provided, the Lyons Joint Venture is supporting an application from the proposed developer of the childcare centre to purchase an additional strip of land from Darwin City Council, to allow for expansion of the existing site and establishment of a childcare centre at Lyons that better suits the community’s needs.

The additional land has an area of approximately 233 square metres and is located adjacent to the existing childcare centre site. It equates to only 0.4 % of the existing Garamanak Park which has a current area of 5.7 hectares. Purchase of this land would enable a new Lyons Childcare Centre of approximately 2,213 square metres, providing around 75 places for local children.

1.2 Purpose and objectives

The engagement process was held in response to a request from Darwin City Council for consultation with the community to ascertain community feedback on the purchase of land for the purposes of establishing the proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons.

The engagement process sought to provide clear and accurate information about the proposal and to obtain community feedback on the proposal through a community survey.

Community feedback is documented in this report and will be provided to Council, for consideration at a Council meeting on Tuesday 13 December.

Lyons Joint Venture: Lyons - Community Consultation for proposed Childcare Centre 2 242 243

2 Engagement overview

This section of the report provides an overview of the engagement process including consultation activities and tools.

2.1 Engagement process

The Community Survey was provided both online and in paper based format. The online survey was available on the Lyons webpage and paper copies of the survey were available for completion at the Lyons Community Centre and Council libraries in Darwin City, Casuarina, Karama and Nightcliff.

For a copy of the survey tool see Appendix A.

The survey invited community feedback for a two week period from Monday 14 November to Tuesday 29 November.

It was widely promoted through:

• A flyer / letterbox drop to all homes at Lyons (see flyer in Appendix B)

• Advertisements in the NT News on Monday 14 November and The Sun on Wednesday 16 November (see ads as they appeared in these papers in Appendix C)

• Displays in Lyons Community Centre and Council libraries (see poster in Appendix D)

• The Lyons webpage at www.lyons.com.au (see screen view in Appendix E)

• Council’s webpage provided a link to the Lyons webpage.

Lyons Joint Venture: Lyons - Community Consultation for proposed Childcare Centre 3 243 244

3 Engagement outcomes

This section of the report includes a profile of respondents who participated in the community survey, and an overview of the key themes and issues raised in participant responses.

3.1 Respondent profile

A total of 15 people took part in the Community Survey. Of these, 10 were residents of Lyons and 4 were residents of wider Darwin (from Wagama, Leanyer and Marrara), and one did not answer this question.

Nine out of the 15 people who took part in the survey lived in a household which has childcare needs. Of these, 4 reported that their childcare needs are currently being met, and 5 had childcare needs which are currently unmet.

Another 5 respondents did not live in a household with childcare needs. However, when asked ‘do you expect your household to have childcare needs within the next 5 years’, a total of only two respondents said ‘no’ and 4 were unsure. Eight respondents expected their childcare needs to be ongoing in 5 years’ time.

3.2 How people found out about / completed the survey

Respondents heard about the survey through a variety of media, with several nominating more than one way. Most saw the survey promoted in a local newspaper (n=7). The flyer/letterbox drop to homes at Lyons (n=3) and Lyons website (n=3) were also nominated. And another 4 respondents found out about the survey through posters in the Lyons Community Centre or Council library. One respondent had heard about the survey via word of mouth.

The majority of survey responses were completed online (n=8), with another three responses completed in hard copy.

3.3 Attitudes towards the proposal

Of the 15 respondents, 13 supported (n=4) or strongly supported (n=9) the proposal for the purchase of land for the purposes of establishing the proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons. One respondent neither supported nor opposed the proposal and another one strongly opposed the proposal.

Reasons for support / opposition to the proposal

Almost all respondents who supported the proposal commented on the existing ‘lack of childcare’ in Lyons and likely ongoing demand for childcare with ‘many young families in the area’. A couple of respondents commented on the ‘small portion of the park land [required] to assist with the [childcare centre] facility’. Indicative quotes:

‘Lack of childcare. Therefore need for larger centre. Only a small proportion of land.’

‘Will be seeking childcare facilities in 2012. This is a small portion of the park land to assist with the facility. There is a community need for more childcare facilities.’

‘If the additional land is needed to develop / build a suitable childcare facility and the land is available for purchase, then I support the proposal.’

Other reasons for respondents' support for the proposal were:

• A desire for ‘community based’ facilities at Lyons. The childcare centre was described as providing ‘a place to go when the rains come’ and a ‘safe environment for children to play’.

• The childcare centre would ‘improve the streetscape’, ‘compliment the park theme’ and contribute to ‘good landscaping around the site’.

Lyons Joint Venture: Lyons - Community Consultation for proposed Childcare Centre 4 244 245

• The childcare centre may solve ‘car parking problems’.

The reason provided by the respondent who did not support the proposal related to loss of parkland: ‘We bought into Lyons and moved here because f the promised design, we don’t want a larger childcare centre at the expense of our common parkland’.

The respondent who neither supported nor opposed the proposal commented on the difficulty retaining childcare centre workers: ‘The main issue with childcare isn’t location or number of centres. It’s that the workers have no incentive to stay’.

Specific issues to be considered in future planning

Respondents nominated a wide range of issues to be considered in future planning for the proposed Childcare Centre at Lyons.

The key considerations focused on:

• The need for preference to be given to Lyons residents when allocating childcare places (n=3) / the need to offer places to both Defence and non Defence families (n=1)

• The need to manage traffic access to and from the centre and on street parking (n=2) / the need for a drop off area (n=1)

• The need for adequate shade and undercover play areas as part of the childcare centre (n=2)

• Need for all abilities playground (n=1) / Future possible needs for expansion of the childcare centre (n=1).

Other issues raised by respondents were:

• A suggestion for a cafe or coffee bar facing the park / public playground, as a compensation for development of the childcare centre.

• The current lack of childcare places for under 2 year olds (n=1)

• The need for sufficient wildlife corridors and bike paths (n=1)

• Other issues: ‘Not an ABC Centre’ (n=1).

3.4 Other comments and suggestions

Around half of all respondents (n=7) provided a further additional comment or suggestion. These focused on:

• The need to address existing and likely future demand for childcare (n=4). Indicative comments:

‘I think it’s a great idea and I hope it goes ahead even if it won’t benefit me personally. I know how hard it was to find good childcare. It will help other families, as childcare places get more tighter’.

‘Needs to be started ASAP. Huge demand!’

• The need for a community gathering place at Lyons such as ‘a small coffee shop’ or ‘coffee bar’ which could provide ‘a place for people to buy tea / coffee / soft drink and cake, to sit outside together...and mingle’ and could also provide ‘supporting funds for the childcare centre’ (n=1).

• A suggestion for priority for childcare places for Lyons residents (n=1).

• The need to ‘ensure that we still have natural spaces’ (n=1).

• The need for traffic calming measures to address speeding near the corner of Daldawa Drive and Damabila Terrace (n=1).

Participant responses are shown in full in Appendix F.

Lyons Joint Venture: Lyons - Community Consultation for proposed Childcare Centre 5 245 246

4 Conclusions and next steps

Community feedback documented in this report will be provided to Council, for consideration at a Council meeting on Tuesday 13 December. A summary of participant feedback including details of support for and opposition to the proposal is provided below.

A total of 15 people took part in the Community Survey conducted in November 2011 to obtain community feedback on the Lyons childcare centre proposal.

The majority of respondents (n=13) supported or strongly supported the proposal, one neither supported nor opposed the proposal, and one strongly opposed the proposal.

Almost all respondents who supported the proposal commented on the need to address existing and likely future demand for childcare at Lyons and in the wider area. Several respondents commented on the small portion of parkland required to assist with development of the childcare centre facility.

The respondent who strongly opposed the proposal did so due to the related loss of parkland.

Other reasons why respondents supported the proposal focused on potential benefits of the proposed childcare centre for residents of Lyons and the wider community.

Issues identified by respondents to be considered in future planning focused on appropriate design and management of the childcare centre to provide for the needs of children, families and residents of Lyons.

Lyons Joint Venture: Lyons - Community Consultation for proposed Childcare Centre 6 246 247

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/20 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

13 OFFICERS REPORTS

13.11 Richardson Ward Regional Playground Community Consultation Feedback Report No. 12C009 JB:kl (31/01/12) Common No. 1163073

Report Number 12C009 JB:kl attached.

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/20 247 248

2ND ORDINARY/OPEN AGENDA ITEM: 13.11

RICHARDSON WARD REGIONAL PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

REPORT No. 12C009 JB:kl COMMON No. 1163073 Date: 31/1/12

Presenter:

Approved: John Banks, General Manager Community & Cultural Services

PURPOSE

This reports presents the community consultation feedback on the proposal for a Richardson Ward Regional Playground on the Dripstone Cliffs in the Casuarina Coastal Reserve (Attachment A).

LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN

Goal 3 Assist Individuals and the Community Stay Connected with the Darwin Region Outcome 3.1 Promote the use of public spaces Key Strategies 3.1.1 Enhance public spaces and encourage greater use by the community

KEY ISSUES

 The results of the surveys and interviews showed there is widespread support for a playground. However there is polorisation of the best location of the playground. Given a number of issues raised during the consultation a further report will be prepared for Council.  The Summary of results from surveys and resident interviews are attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT it be a recommendation to Council:-

A. THAT Report Number 12C009 JB:kl entitled Richardson Ward Regional Playground Community Consultation Feedback, be received and noted.

B. THAT a further report be prepared in respect to a potential regional playground within the Richardson Ward.

248 249

PAGE: 2 REPORT NUMBER: 12C009 JB:kl SUBJECT: RICHARDSON WARD REGIONAL PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

BACKGROUND

PREVIOUS DECISIONS

Decision No. 20\4665 (29/11/11)

A. THAT Report Number 11C0139 entitled Richardson Ward/Casuarina Coastal Reserve regional Playground Community Consultation plan, be received and noted. B. THAT Council endorse the Richardson Ward Regional Playground Community Consultation Plan, Attachment A to Report No. 11C0139 JB:kl.

Decision No.20\3634 (15/02/11)

A. THAT Report Number 11C0025 SD:kl, entitled, Richardson Ward Regional Playground Update, be received and noted. B. THAT subject to the agreement of the Northern Territory Government and Richardson Ward Aldermen, Council endorse the draft concept plan (Attachment A) for the Richardson Ward Regional Playground at Casuarina Coastal Reserve. C. THAT a Communication Plan be developed for the conduct of community consultation for the proposed Richardson Ward Regional Playground at Casuarina Coastal Reserve and the consultation outcomes be reported to Council. D. THAT this decision be moved into Open.

Decision No. 20\3462 (30/11/10)

THAT Council withdraws its endorsement of the proposed concept plan for the Casuarina Coastal Reserve playground until the concept plans incorporate the comments of the Richardson aldermen and the concept plan provides the same play opportunities as other regional playgrounds

Reason – This concept design did not incorporate the previous amendment and discussion agreed to by the Richardson Ward.

Decision No. 20\3427 (16/11/10)

A. THAT Report Number 10C0154 SD:kl entitled, Regional Playground for Richardson Ward be received and noted. B. THAT for the purpose of community consultation Council endorse the draft concept plan for the Casuarina Coastal Reserve Playground and that following the conduct of community consultation a further report be presented to Council.

249 250

PAGE: 3 REPORT NUMBER: 12C009 JB:kl SUBJECT: RICHARDSON WARD REGIONAL PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

Decision No. 20\2589 (30/3/10)

THAT this matter lay on the table until a site meeting has occurred between the Richardson ward Aldermen and the General Manager Community & Cultural Services.

A. THAT Council endorses the proposed location of the regional playground in the Richardson Ward being at Casuarina Coastal Reserve and to ensue specific shade requirements are addressed. B. THAT community consultation commence and a further report be prepared presenting the outcomes of the consultation in relation to the regional playground in the Richardson Ward being at Casuarina Coastal Reserve.

Decision No. 20\1702 (30/6/09)

A. THAT Report Number 09c0087 entitled, Proposed New Regional Playground Locations, be received and noted. B. THAT Council endorses the proposed location of the regional playground in the Richardson Ward being at Casuarina Coastal Reserve. C. THAT community consultation commence and a further report be prepared presenting the outcomes of the consultation in relation to the regional playground in the Richardson Ward being at Casuarina Coastal Reserve.

DISCUSSION

Michels Warren Munday were engaged in November 2011 to conduct community consultation on the proposal for a Richardson Ward Regional Playground on the Dripstone Cliffs in the Casuarina Coastal Reserve. Summary of consultation and results are contained with the consultant’s report (Attachment A).

CONSULTATION PROCESS

Consultation has been undertaken with the local community in line with the Consultation Plan adopted at the Council meeting held on 29 November 2011.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

BUDGET AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS

Consultancy expenses - $31,164.65 (includes GST)

Council has a budget allocation of $343,340 to design and construct the play space.

RISK/LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

250 251

PAGE: 4 REPORT NUMBER: 12C009 JB:kl SUBJECT: RICHARDSON WARD REGIONAL PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

COUNCIL OFFICER CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

Nil.

JOHN BANKS GENERAL MANAGER COMMUNITY & CULTURAL SERVICES

Any queries on this report may be directed to John Banks on 89300633 or [email protected]

251 252

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT RICHARDSON WARD REGIONAL PLAYGROUND

Prepared by Michels Warren Munday

10 December 2011

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Report 252 253 1

Contents 1. OVERVIEW ...... 3 2. BACKGROUND ...... 4 The immediate locale: Brinkin ...... 4 The broader locale: Richardson Ward ...... 5 Casuarina Coastal Reserve ...... 5 Background on playgrounds ...... 7 Background on Richardson Ward Regional Playground concept ...... 8 Other parks and playgrounds ...... 9 Leanyer Recreation Park ...... 9 Lake Alexander ...... 9 Jingili Water Gardens ...... 9 Lyons ...... 10 Anula Oval ...... 10 Other parks near the Dripstone Cliffs ...... 10 Other sports and kids’ facilities ...... 11 3. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION ...... 12 Method ...... 12 Interviews ...... 12 4. RESULTS...... 13 Preliminary results ...... 13 Summary of results ...... 13 Key statistical results (some subjectivity in determining attitudes): ...... 14 Other statistical results ...... 15 Brinkin residents ...... 16 Qualitative results summary ...... 20 What do people value in a playground ...... 20 Suggestions for a good playground ...... 20 What playgrounds do people like now? ...... 21 General comments ...... 22 Police ...... 22 Schools ...... 22 5. SUMMARY OF POSITIONS AND VALUES ...... 24 Summary of values ...... 24

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

253 254 2

6. OPTIONS ...... 26 What might be some compromises or trade offs that would make the proposal more acceptable? ...... 26 What alternatives might win greater support? ...... 26 Opportunities? ...... 26

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

254 255 3

1. OVERVIEW

Darwin City Council is considering a proposal for a Richardson Ward Regional Playground on the Dripstone Cliffs in Brinkin on an area of government land that is part of the Casuarina Coastal Reserve managed by Parks and Wildlife.

Council wants a facility that is popular with all age groups, from toddlers to teenagers. The proposal incorporates a 700 square metre playground in a 5000 square metre space that could include landscaping, playground equipment for all ages, open lawn space for games, seating, shade and barbecue facilities that will be attractive for families and a general environment that is challenging for kids, safe and welcoming.

Michels Warren Munday was engaged to conduct community consultation for the playground. The consultation had two key strands:

1. To ensure nearby residents and other key stakeholders were informed about the proposal and that they had a chance to raise any concerns about how the playground might impact on their amenity or existing uses of the land; 2. To ensure potential users were well-informed and had input to the design and nature of facilities to ensure the proposed playground meets community needs.

The International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) describes public participation (or community engagement as it is known is Australia) as “any process that involves the public in problem-solving or decision-making and uses public input to make decisions”.

A sustainable decision is described as one that is:

 economically viable  technically feasible  environmentally compatible  publicly acceptable.

For residents, this community consultation will have been successful if people feel the process was transparent and fair and that their input has been heard and contributed to good decision-making.

For council, the consultation plan will be successful if it accurately and objectively told the community’s story, contributed to good decision-making and provided ideas that will enhance the proposal.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

255 256 4

2. BACKGROUND The immediate locale: Brinkin The suburb of Brinkin is a well-established, wealthy northern suburb of Darwin that lies between Royal Darwin Hospital and Charles Darwin University. Many doctors and successful business people live here in large houses on large blocks with lush tropical gardens and expansive balconies to take in the magnificent sunsets.

One of the attractions of living in Brinkin is access to the beach, the Dripstone Cliffs and Casuarina Coastal Reserve which are regarded as iconic spots to walk dogs, picnic with families, jog, bicycle and enjoy nature. At sunset, families gather to watch what is described in tourist brochures as an experience that “will truly take your breath away”. The beach is popular with wedding parties and nature photographers alike. Just offshore from the striking red cliffs and shady casuarina trees is Nunggalinya (Old Man Rock), a special site for the traditional owners of this country, the Larrakia people.

There are the odd trouble spots. The passing traffic includes vehicles heading down to the “nude beach” which has more recently become a polite euphemism for a men’s pick up joint. The locals refer to shady characters who give the locale an unsavoury feel. Up on the cliffs, residents complain of teenagers congregating, hooning and playing loud music into the night while to the left, towards the Rapid Creek bridge, and in the bush to the right, towards the hospital, ‘campers’ congregate. There are regular police to move them on.

The demographic profile of the Brinkin-Tiwi end of Richardson Ward suggests the population is older than the average Darwin residents, which may reflect the fact that much of Brinkin is home to long- established families rather than young families just setting up. This was reflected in the findings of our survey that showed that only 5.9% of Brinkin respondents come to the beach with children and 23.5% as a family group, compared with 16.4% and 41.8% respectively of general northern suburbs respondents.

The suburb also includes a large number of units along Trower Road and around Omeo Street, which it might be assumed includes nearby hospital staff and university students.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

256 257 5

It was noted during consultation that a large number of Indian people live in the area and use the Dripstone Cliffs area so special effort was made to incorporate these people by sending the survey to the Indian Cultural Society.

The broader locale: Richardson Ward Richardson Ward covers much of Darwin’s northern suburbs, commonly seen as the voters who most strongly influence the outcome of Territory elections. Established after the 1974 Cyclone Tracy, these are suburbs built for families so there is a lower proportion of units than in some other parts of the city. The Ward also takes in the GPT owned Casuarina Shopping Centre and the new Defence Housing sponsored suburb of Lyons (which wouldn’t be accurately represented in the statistics below) and proposed suburb of Muirhead. It’s not surprising to find that the composition of residents is generally younger than the Darwin average, with the highest proportion of people aged 0-17 in the suburbs of Wagaman and Wanguri, followed by Alawa and Nakara. (We have included Wulagi in the chart below as, although it isn’t in Richardson Ward, this suburb lies between Wagaman and Leanyer. Other northern suburbs include Jingili, Milner, Moil, Anula, Malak and Karama).

2006 Darwin Alawa- Wagaman- Leanyer- Tiwi-Brinkin Wulagi (not Census municipali Nakara Wanguri Lee Point in ward) ty Total pop 73,164 4099 3916 5279 3964 2570 0-4 total 4547 286 281 291 221 253 0-4 as % 6.2 7 7.2 5.5 5.6 9.8 5-17 total 12,134 803 848 1001 588 542 5-17 as % 16.6 19.6 21.7 19 14.8 21.1 0-17 22.8% 26.6% 28.9% 24.5% 20.4% 30.9% 18-64 total 50,787 2721 2518 3529 2788 1652 18-64 as % 69.4 66.4 64.3 66.8 70.4 64.3 65-84 total 5382 270 275 443 318 113 65-84 as % 7.4 6.6 6.6 8.4 8.0 4.4 85+ total 314 14 13 10 49 9 85+ as % 0.4% 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.2 0.4

Casuarina Coastal Reserve Casuarina Coastal Reserve, which incorporates the Dripstone Cliffs, covers 1361 hectares and eight kilometres of coastline in the Darwin coastal bioregion. Gazetted in 1982, it is one of five relatively small reserves within a 15 kilometre radius of Darwin and is administered by the Parks and Wildlife section of the Department of Natural Resources, Environment, the Arts and Sport (NRETAS). The reserve stretches from Rapid Creek to Lee Point and Buffalo Creek and includes walking trails, World

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

257 258 6

War Two observation posts, a cycle path, picnic tables and a number of free ranger-guided activities during the Dry season.

The reserve attracts up to 800,000 visitors a year (source: interpretive signage by Parks and Wildlife) and incorporates sandy beaches, tidal flats, estuaries, dune systems, mangrove communities, Casuarina forests, fringing monsoon forest and habitats for migratory birds and turtles.

The values of the reserve, as identified in the reserve’s previous 2002 management plan, include:

 historic (there are World War Two relics)  Aboriginal culture (the area is the traditional land of the Larrakia people and includes sacred sites offshore such as Nunggalinya or ‘Old Man Rock’ that is visible at low tide)  natural (coastal habitats for migratory birds and turtles)  aesthetic (people visit for the sunsets, the walks, the solitude and the scenery)  educational and interpretive  recreation and tourism  conservation.

Parks and Wildlife is seeking greater engagement with the community in the management of the reserve and has established an advisory committee with 25 members including community members, Larrakia, Parks and Wildlife, Darwin City Council, youth and the Surf Life Saving Club. It is conducting a survey to determine how people use the coastal reserve.

There are concerns about impacts on the reserve from the rapidly encroaching urban development, degradation of some facilities due to budgetary constraints and rubbish left by visitors.

Parks and Wildlife rangers patrol the reserve and regularly move on large camps of itinerants. A key issue of concern to the public in the reserve is the level of vandalism and litter associated with these itinerants, with feelings of unease in secluded spots where cars may be broken into. A boardwalk was recently set alight.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

258 259 7

Background on playgrounds A report by the SGL Consulting Group for Palmerston City Council dated September 2010 (www.palmerston.nt.gov.au) outlines a theoretical basis of playground strategy and ‘play categories’ (p. 8):

“An underlying principle in developing a playground strategy is to understand that children’s play and recreation is of great importance in their physical, social, cognitive, creative and emotional development. Children represent the future of our society and planning for quality play environments is therefore seen as an investment in the future. The role of public playgrounds should be to make up for experiences not otherwise available to children in their everyday situation.”

The paper outlines four broad categories of play behaviour:

 cognitive play includes activities which challenge the intellect, games of strategy, exploration and observation, and games that use and develop language;  creative play includes sand play, water play, play in dirt, play with loose and found objects or art materials, making music and cubby building and construction activities;  social/dramatic play includes role-play, imaginative play, small and large group activities and traditional games;  physically active play includes running, hanging, climbing, experiencing height, ability/gymnastic activities, sliding, jumping, balancing, swinging, crawling, bouncing, spinning, rocking, ball games, skipping and perceptual motor activity.

Based on a review of design principles, the paper outlines the elements that should be developed in playgrounds including formal play areas (with play equipment for different age groups of children), informal play areas (such as kick about areas, sports practice facilities, skate and cycling areas and natural landscapes) and the need for landscaping and access for people with disabilities.

There is valuable background on the role and design of playgrounds on the West Australian KidsSafe website, including a segment on the growing role of nature-based playgrounds (www.kidssafewa.com.au)

“Playing outside is not just about letting off steam. It is a vital part of childhood that helps children develop physical strength, coordination and balance. It can also provide opportunities for children to learn and develop (social skills, imagination and creativity, thinking and problem-solving skills, a sense of self, a sense of connection and self care skills).”

Darwin City Council currently administers three regional and 113 local playgrounds in the municipality.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

259 260 8

Background on Richardson Ward Regional Playground concept The Richardson Ward regional playground was proposed several years ago, after the success of the Lake Alexander playground at East Point and as part of a move to build regional playgrounds in each of the four council wards.

In 2007 a number of sites were identified as potential locations for regional playgrounds including behind the Gardens Oval, Mindil Beach, behind Nakara Oval, at Wanguri Oval, Peace Park in Leanyer and at the Casuarina Coastal Reserve, which is Government land.

In 2009, these were short-listed to:

 Peace Park at Leanyer: a large area of land with some infrastructure but limited parking;  Lions Park near the Surf Life Saving Club below the Dripstone Cliffs. This was initially the preferred option by both Darwin City Council and Parks and Wildlife and a nature-based concept was developed. There is already a small playground there, large grassed areas, tables and barbecues. However, there were concerns by the three ward aldermen that this area attracts campers, families are reluctant to visit the area after dark, there are mosquitoes and it doesn’t offer the experience of watching the sunset while children play.  Dripstone Cliffs in the existing picnic area bounded by the carpark, the former Trower Road (which has now been realigned), bushland and public toilets to the right and a bike path and cliffs. There are already several tables in the area, but no barbecues, water fountains, play or exercise equipment. A group of about five houses on Trower Road directly overlook the area. The Ward aldermen felt the park is an ideal location as it is already popular with families and will enhance the experience of visiting Dripstone Cliffs. However, they also acknowledged that this area was already valued for its passive use by nearby residents. (The photo above shows the area of the proposed playground, which is the area bounded by the blue line in the map above.)

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

260 261 9

Other parks and playgrounds Other parks and playgrounds available to northern suburbs residents include:

Leanyer Recreation Park

The park is owned by the Northern Territory Government (NRETAS) and managed by the YMCA. This popular park off Vanderlin Drive, 15 kilometres from the CBD, provides free access to a lagoon, three waterslides, an ‘all abilities’ playground, skate park, basketball court, cycling paths, shaded barbecue and picnic areas. A new water facility includes a swimming pool, children’s paddling pools and a water playground, with lifeguards on duty. The wet play area is currently closed (from October until Christmas) for repairs and an upgrade to the playground equipment. The park can be accessed by public bus or by a bitumen cycling path from nearby suburbs. A number of bird species come into the park from the surrounding bushland.

Lake Alexander

Lake Alexander, in the East Point Reserve, opened in 1991 and is popular for families with young children as it provides an all year round safe swimming area in a hot, tropical city where the nearby Fannie Bay Beach is seen as unsafe for swimming much of the year due to stingers and crocodiles. The site of Lake Alexander was originally an area of low-lying coastal marsh. The 3.5 hectare man-made lake is up to 2.8 metres deep with water quality similar to other naturally occurring swimming areas. The landscaped surrounds include a beach, shady lawns, playground, toilets and free barbecue area that also attracts backpackers and other tourists. The carpark also serves a Mangrove Boardwalk to Ludmilla Creek, that provides an interesting nature-based excursion with interpretive signage. Feedback from users is that the park is popular but some have been put off by the fact that itinerants often camp in the area leaving faeces and other rubbish, although the park is well-maintained by council.

Jingili Water Gardens

The Jingili Water Gardens, was opened in 1999 by Darwin City Council and offers free barbecues, an undercover picnic area and plenty of parking. There is boat-themed playground equipment under shade cloth including swings, slides, obstacles, a rock wall and

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

261 262 10

wheelchair ramps. Landscaped gardens include shallow ponds, extensive bicycle and pedestrian paths, a skate and BMX park on the Trower Road side of the park, a large grassy hill and an adjacent oval used for horse riding. There is a community organic garden available only to members. The gardens are popular for functions such as weddings and community events. The playground has facilities for disabled children, such as the “Variety Liberty Swing” that allows for a wheelchair to be strapped in.

Lyons The new suburb of Lyons is a master-planned community developed by Canberra Investment Corporation on former Defence land. The development includes Larrakia-themed public art, and a community centre now run by Darwin City Council. The development is next to the recently upgraded Tracy Social Club, which includes play facilities. The central playground is attractive and well-landscape but it is not shaded.

Anula Oval This council-owned facility at the rear of the Anula shops includes a sports oval and a large playground with sand base and wheelchair ramps. It is a good venue for kids to ride bicycles on nearby paths. The area is shaded and there is seating, tables and carparking. The area is a regular venue for council’s fun bus. The playground is partially fenced on the carpark side.

Other parks near the Dripstone Cliffs There are a number of smaller local parks in the vicinity, including Lions Park on Daribah Road at Lee Point next to Casuarina Beach and the Surf Life Saving Club. There is no shade during the day. There are barbecues and tables and chairs. This was the original site proposed for the Richardson Ward Regional Playground.

Most nearby schools also have good playgrounds and contributed substantial expertise to this consultation. 1. Lyons playground There are council-sponsored childcare centres at 2. Anula Oval playground Casuarina, Karama and Malak. 3. Lions Park (Dripstone)

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

262 263 11

Other sports and kids’ facilities There are many sporting facilities in the northern suburbs including the council-owned Anula oval , Community satisfaction survey government-owned Marrara sports facilities and several ovals. A recent community satisfaction survey commissioned The council also runs a Fun Bus, which is a mobile by Darwin City Council found that 74% of respondents playground for children aged 0 to 5, a ‘Free had used council parks and 35% had used playgrounds. Recreation and Entertainment for Everyone in the Parks (FREEPS)’ program on Sundays and a ‘Fun in Asked about issues that were of ‘high’ importance, the Parks’ free school holiday program at various respondents assigned high ratings to maintenance of ovals and parks around Darwin. parks (4.3) and playgrounds (4.2).

Council currently is considering a Youth Asked for their satisfaction ratings, maintenance of Entertainment Precinct in the northern suburbs. parks was given a rating of 3.8 and playgrounds was given a rating of 3.7.

Of relevance to reaching Darwin residents, the survey found that 47% of respondents nominated the

Northern Territory News as their main source of information about council issues and 21% nominated the Darwin City Council website.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

263 264 12

3. SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION

Method 1. Scoping study, including observation of behaviour in northern suburbs playgrounds, desk research, interviews with Aldermen, council website, Palmerston Council Playgrounds Strategy, interview council staff and Mode Design, reading previous council decisions, stakeholder and demographic research; 2. Prepared a consultation plan, which was approved by council; 3. Letter drop and doorknock of all Trower Road houses from Claymore Circuit down (two households not spoken to, seven surveys returned including two anonymous) 4. Letter delivered to all Brinkin households; 5. Letter delivered by contractor to all other northern suburbs households; 6. Letter sent to Indian Cultural Society; 7. Media release issued by council; 8. Fact sheet placed on website and given out in meetings; 9. Electronic surveys for Brinkin and general Darwin residents from Michels Warren Munday and Darwin City Council websites; 10. Public notices in the Darwin Sun and NT News (Wednesday and Saturday); 11. Consultant’s attendance at Dripstone Cliffs on Sunday afternoon; 12. Sent letter to all electorate offices, schools, pre-schools, playgroups and asked them to distribute; 13. Contacted all people thought likely to have opinions on the project.

Interviews In-depth interviews were conducted with most residents along Trower Road, individual and group interviews in several schools and playgroups (including teachers, mothers and children), police, Larrakia member of the Casuarina Coastal Reserve Bill Risk, the Member for Casuarina Kon Vatskalis, Margaret Clinch of the Planning Action Network, a university lecturer in early childhood development and other members of the public who got in touch.

The consultant attended a meeting of the Casuarina Coastal Reserve Advisory committee and spoke to a number of people on a Sunday afternoon at the Dripstone Cliffs picnic area, including representatives from the Surf Life Saving Club and Landcare.

A number of letters were sent to the consultants, some expressing concerns about the proposal and some very detailed ideas about what playground equipment could be included in the playground and ideas of other good sites around Australia.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

264 265 13

4. RESULTS Although the main emphasis of the consultation was on face to face contact, surveys were conducted to expand the reach of the consultation program.

Preliminary results  12 households on Trower Road interviewed and 7 surveys returned  18 Brinkin residents have returned surveys  58 Darwin residents have returned surveys  28 adults and several children spoken to at Dripstone Cliffs meeting

Summary of results The results of the surveys and resident interviews show strong polarisation with the strongest opposition coming from Trower Road and Brinkin residents The Dripstone Cliffs are the jewel in but also significant opposition from residents in other the crown of the coastal reserve – nearby suburbs such as Tiwi. It needs to be said that people description of amenities including who oppose something are more likely to respond but on drinking fountains, barbecues and the other hand there was no strong voice calling for a picnic tables makes it sound like a playground before the announcement. The main issues full-scale foreshore development. raised were safety, that the playground is not in keeping with the natural values of the reserve, concerns about attracting extra traffic, itinerants and hoons, and that the playground would take away a well-used space. The playground is planned to be The results of the broader interviews with schools and built on the only available patch of playgroups demonstrate strong support for the concept of a grass on the cliff tops which is playground. The qualifications are that schools would be suitable for use for informal sports unlikely to visit it as most have good playground equipment, activities. If the playground is to be buses are expensive, and it would be used more as a built, why not develop areas nearby ‘reward’ tacked on to a more educational excursion. The which are dirt? Is there really the strongest comments related to safety and the need for need for a playground on top of the fencing. cliffs? The whole beach is a playground. Make the parents get Superintendent Jamie O’Brien of Casuarina Police observed up off their chairs and walk/play on that police generally don’t experience problems with the beach with their kids! itinerants in open areas. He said campers prefer more secluded spots where they can sleep out and hide their alcohol. Police and Darwin City Council currently are I don’t mind, we need more public cooperating on an exercise to move on itinerants who have places. I always wondered why they been causing particular problems towards Rapid Creek. hadn’t developed this area. It would quite pleasant… to have children Both groups of interviews elicited a lot of good ideas about around and playing. As long as it’s what people wanted in a playground and good playgrounds cared for and looked after. they had visited elsewhere.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

265 266 14

There was ambivalence about the Lions Park alternative The beach is the playground for the but many comments about the need for council to consider kids, they walk on the beach, fly other options and why there hadn’t been any previous kites, use the cliffs area for cricket. communication on the project. Some residents recall It’s a different sort of crowd that when Lions Park was much better used by families and feel goes here…. This is a natural there is great potential to rejuvenate the area and make playground, we don’t need an this a safe, family-oriented place through better artificial one. landscaping and crime prevention measures. Those in favour of the Lions Park option say it provides safer access to the beach, could be linked to improvements at the Surf A smaller scale and more natural Life Saving Club and already has a playground and play area (which is clean and safe) barbecues that could be enhanced. would be more suitable than large bright coloured play equipment Generally, Lions Park has the potential to become more of which will inevitably be destroyed a daytime play and picnic area while the cliffs comes alive and grafittied after dark making it in the evenings with more adult-oriented activities such as unsafe for children to use during the walking, jogging, picnicking with friends and watching the day. sunset.

There are mixed views about the concept of a nature- The carpark would need extending, based playground. Some residents feel it is in keeping with that would be a further intrusion. the area, others feel it could be more expensive to We don’t want to lose any more maintain and that a traditional playground is more space to carparking. The barbecues appropriate. would attract the wrong people: In summary: there is widespread support for a playground noisy, itinerants, drunks yakking however polarisation over the best location and a common around the barbecues. view that if a playground does proceed this is a chance to do something special that caters for all ages and abilities.

Key statistical results (some subjectivity in determining attitudes):

Trower Road residents* 5 support 8 oppose

Brinkin residents 7 support 2 ambivalent 9 oppose

Other residents 39 support 6 ambivalent 12 oppose

Dripstone cliffs meeting 7 support 7 ambivalent 12 oppose

** This is based on interviews. We received seven surveys but some were anonymous and some were people already spoken to. Of these, 3 expressed concern, 1 said it was a bad thing, 2 were unsure and 1 said it was a good thing.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

266 267 15

Other statistical results

Two surveys were prepared in order to compare the reactions of people who lived closest to the proposed site with other northern suburbs. Not surprisingly, the level of opposition was greatest from those living closest to the proposed site. However the reasons given by those concerned were similar (see further discussion below).

There were 58 formal responses to the general survey:

Respondents were asked to nominate the 10 most important factors in choosing a playground. The most important factors are:

 shaded 84.6% The downside of Lions Park is it’s a  clean 76.9% bit dark and seedy, it’s near the free  good place for a family outing 67.3% beach. There’s no breezes so it’s  toilets 61.5% hotter. It’s a nice little area but  safe play equipment 60.8% somehow it doesn’t have a good feel  good for all ages of children 55.8% about it. The attraction is that it’s  parking close by 53.8% more natural.  seating 51.9%  being able to keep an eye on the kids 50.0%  lawn 48.1% Lions Park suits it more, if you could  free of itinerants, camping 46.2% attract people to go there. Kids  variety of things to do 44.2% already go to the Surf Life Saving  challenging things for kids to do 42.3% Club. I used to jog there. The only  barbecues 40.4% problem is the long grassers sitting  nice landscaping 38.5% around. And the mozzies. There’s a  nature-based activities 34.6% mozzie problem because it’s so  a place where kids can meet 34.6% shrouded.  accessible by bicycle 34.6%  pets welcome 30.8%  can walk to it 28.8% You shouldn’t fence it off. If it’s a  good for toddlers 25% six-foot fence you will turn it into a  no pets 25% prison. The first impression is the  natural bush 25% last impression... If you put in  good place for kids’ parties 19.2% fencing you will kill the whole feel of  disabled facilities 15.4% the area, keep it open.  not secluded 9.6%  good for teenagers 7.7%  accessible by bus 7.7%  secluded 5.8%

Of the respondents, 93% had visited the Dripstone Cliffs area, 34% several times a week.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

267 268 16

The main things respondents do there: It would be great to come down and have parties and a barbecue. At the  watching the sunset 74.5% moment we bring down the portable  strolling 70.6% gas barbecue.  meeting friends 45.1%  bicycling 41.2%  walking dogs 41.2% A lot of people come here for the  picnic 37.3% sunset. You can have an area where  jogging 17.6% the older people can sit and watch  ball games 13.7% the sunset. They would probably come earlier. You can sit and relax People most commonly visit as a family group (41.8%) or and have tea together. with a wife, husband or partner (20%), with a child or children (16.4%), on their own (10.9%), with a small group of friends (7.3%) or with a large group of friends (3.6%).

Most commonly used facilities are the paths to the beach (87.3%), car park (72.7%), lawns (60%), tables (47.3%) and toilets (25.5%).

Facilities that would be used if provided were shaded area to sit (82.4%), drinking fountain (72.5%), barbecue (64.7%) and playground (60.8%).

A summary of reactions:

Fantastic 49.1% I like the natural look, the sound of the wind through the trees, people Good 19.3% walking their dogs, you can kick a football, there are families with Not sure 10.5% barbecues. You can see frill-necked Bad thing 8.8% lizards. It’s natural.

Really concerned 12.3%

Brinkin residents

Factors that were considered important by Brinkin residents when considering a playground were:

clean 83.3%

shaded 75% This is not a playground, it’s a place. good place for a family outing 75% Get the kids to appreciate the place. We rode here and gathered bush toilets 75% tucker on the way. can walk to it 50%

natural bush 50%

being able to keep an eye on kids 50%

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

268 269 17

safe play equipment 50% With such a wonderful climate, it is great to hear of more playgrounds challenging things for kids to do 41.7% to entertain the children and so free of itinerants camping 41.7% close to the beach is a bonus.

good for children of all ages 41.7%

seating 41.7% I think it is great for the kids. Also great for adults to use for exercise parking close by 41.7% early in the morning or late evening (when the kids are not using it. barbecues 41.7%

lawn 41.7% I think this is a wonderful area that nature-based activities 25% needs to be improved. A lot of people use this area already and a variety of things to do 25% lot more would it if was improved. pets welcome 25% At minimum irrigation to keep it green with shade, tables and BBQs no pets 25% would be fantastic. great place for kids’ parties 25%

place for kids to meet 16.7% We already love the place and having extra facilities would make it good for toddlers 16.7% even better. We have missed not disabled facilities 16.7% having a playground on the cliffs. We find that Lions Park has a lot of not secluded 16.7% mosquitoes.

accessible by bicycle 16.7%

accessible by bus 8.3% Another nice place to entertain kids while enjoying sea breeze and secluded 8.3% watching the sun set. good for teenagers 0%

Of the Brinkin respondents, 64.7% said they visit the Dripstone Cliffs area daily.

Their main reasons are strolling (70.6%), watching the sunset (64.7%), cycling (58.8%), walking dogs (58.8%), meeting friends (29.4%), picnic (29.4%), ball games (17.6%), jogging (11.8%)

When they visit the area, 35.3% are with a small group of friends, 23.5% are with a family group, 23.5% are with a wife, husband or partner, 11.8% are on their own and 5.9% are with a child or children.

Facilities used now are paths to the beach (94.1%), lawns (70.6%), car park (47.1%), tables (47.1%), toilets (29.4%).

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

269 270 18

Facilities that would be used were shaded area to sit (70%), barbecue (66.7%), drinking fountain (66.7%) and playground (41.7%).

Their response:

Fantastic 33.3% I would hate to see it all reduced to Good thing 5.6% mown picnic areas with visually intrusive plastic structures. Kids Not sure 11.1% need to experience more than lawn and plastic. Bad thing 38.9%

Really concerned 11.1%

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

270 271 19

Brinkin residents were asked to respond to some additional questions to assess their perceptions of impact.

Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Response disagree % % % agree count % % % Dripstone Cliffs is the ideal 55.6 0 11.1 5.6 27.8 18 place Lions Park is better 11.1 16.7 16.7 22.2 33.3 18 Go somewhere else 25 18.8 6.3 12.5 37.5 16 altogether I don’t want the playground 26.7 0 20 13.3 40 15 to block my view I would be worried if trees 11.8 0 5.9 29.4 52.9 17 were cleared I would be worried if tall 11.8 6.7 40 6.7 6.7 15 trees blocked my view Leave the area around the 5.9 0 35.3 17.6 41.2 17 playground as grass Landscape the area around 21.4 0 35.7 28.6 14.3 14 the playground Put a fence on the car park 37.5 6.3 25 18.8 12.5 16 side of the playground Put a fence on the cliff side 43.8 6.3 25 12.5 12.5 16 of the playground Fence it all around 42.9 14.3 21.4 7.1 14.3 14 I want a normal playground 33.3 6.7 33.3 20 6.7 15 like Lake Alexander I would prefer a nature- 6.3 25 18.8 31.3 18.8 16 based playground where kids have to make their own fun I would like the playground 43.8 12.5 18.8 12.5 12.5 16 to be bright and colourful I would prefer neutral 13.3 13.3 33.3 20 20 15 colours to blend in with the surroundings There should be shade over 12.5 6.3 31.3 12.5 37.5 16 the playground Include seating for parents 13.3 6.7 20 20 40 15 and carers Include barbecues 40 6.7 13.3 6.7 33.3 15 Facilities for the disabled are 13.3 0 20 20 46.7 15 important

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

271 272 20

Qualitative results summary

Positive feedback Negative feedback Would be good to have a place to  One of the biggest concerns is about children’s safety and take the kids, grandkids the danger of kids falling over the cliffs, therefore it would Would be good to have kids playing need to be fenced (and residents are strongly opposed to nearby fencing). Would be a family place to watch  Fencing would make it like a prison. the sunsets  Concerns about traffic, hoons, loud parties, rubbish. Will give kids something to do  Already problems with vandalism, who will maintain it, Will use the barbecues and seating cost of replacing. Will provide a good venue for  Shortage of parking – and another carpark would be seniors to sit and socialise intrusive and just attract more trouble.  Have experienced a lot of trouble with hoons doing wheelies, donuts and playing loud music at night, facilities will make the area more attractive.  Barbecues, shade and seating will attract more itinerants.  The shade will get shredded.  Not in keeping with natural values.  You’ll need more toilets.  Will disrupt existing uses of the area, particularly the grassed area which is used for informal cricket, soccer, athletics games, weddings and parties.  Will set a precedent, shouldn’t be excising land.  Visual impacts, colourful playground will be intrusive, will it block views of the sunset.  Will it increase rates?  Not a good use of my rates.

What do people value in a playground  shade and shelter  cleanliness (itinerants put a lot of people off using barbecues and there was discussion about syringes and contaminated sand)  seating – somewhere for grandma to sit or mums to talk while they watch their kids  water bubblers, taps and showers  water and paddling pools  separation from the big kids

Suggestions for a good playground  no sand, but rubber matting or free fall  water bubblers that include a tray for dogs to drink from  tactile and multi-sensory to cater for disabled children  include some low-key exercise equipment or walking equipment for mums  seating should be low and in the playground for mums to sit  people like the idea of some sort of adventure playground

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

272 273 21

 water play  café or coffee shop  innovative elements like solar light One of the best playgrounds that I have been to is at Palm  kids had lots of ideas for what they would like to Beach/Currumbin on the Gold see for older kids, in particular flying foxes, but Coast. The playground was built also an obstacle course, maze, cubby house, by the Gold Coast City Council. spinning things. It was just such an imaginative What playgrounds do people like now? playground. It is a pirate ship Most of the existing playgrounds were nominated but and has heaps of little interactive people particularly liked the Anula Oval playground. It is features, including: seen as safe and shaded, kids can cycle there and safely cycle on the nearby paths, there’s a ramp and lots to do,  A slippery slide inside the good views of the playground for parents, it’s great for kids pirate ship for both toddlers and another slide for slightly of all ages. bigger kids  Tunnels (barrels) that you The old pirate boat that used to be at the Nightcliff can crawl through Shopping Centre was seen as fun, as well as the tree and  Musical instruments such as water activities at the Botanical Gardens. xylophones,  A large sandpit Others commonly mentioned frequently were Nightcliff,  A telescope  A small boat with a steering Leanyer Recreation Park, Jingili Water Gardens and Lake wheel Alexander.  Caves to hide in  A treasure map, and you A number of good interstate playground were nominated can dig in the areas for the including Donnybrook in WA, the Strand in Townsville, a buried treasure. teenagers’ playground in Victor Harbour, Redfern, New  Shaded picnic areas for BBQs/parties Farm in Brisbane (a fortress in a tree), Katoomba, Glenelg in SA, Gungahal in Canberra (has climbing ropes, a giant pendulum and flying fox) and Lake Macquarie Variety Playground at Speers Point.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

273 274 22

General comments  lots of support for playgrounds, just concern about the location, is there really a need, don’t we have Would the design of the enough already playgrounds be inclusive of  no need to cater for Lyons and Muirhead, they have children in wheelcharis and if their own yes would that include  playgrounds should be planned when suburbs are features that vary from other built, not retrofitted playgrounds in Darwin? eg there is a Liberty Swing at the  this is a chance to do something different and special Jingili Water Gardens so  why weren’t we given a choice would a different kind of  suspicion that this is just an election ploy moulded swing with back,  cynicism about consultation neck and head support and  remove it after five years if it doesn’t work harness or perhaps a Sway-  put the money into upgrading bicycle tracks or Fun Glinder be installed at this upgrading the Surf Life Saving Club, the Anula playground? playground, putting in an independent walking and cycling track  the shade won’t last in the strong winds we get here, use metal  use soft fall not sand  support for nature-based playground but it’s expensive to maintain  use multi-age equipment  there is a general trend to fencing off public open space that’s concerning  kids are kept in cotton wool, they learn resilience from accidents  support playgrounds but generally they should be places you can walk to  need greater provision for pocket parks in the CBD for women trapped all day in apartments, so they have somewhere for kids to play and to meet people.

Police Superintendent Jamie O’Brien of Casuarina Police says police generally don’t have trouble with itinerants in open spaces as they prefer to congregate where they can sleep or hide grog. There are many design features that can be incorporated to discourage itinerants. Police are planning a major operation with council to move on itinerants, who are a real problem in the Rapid Creek area.

Schools Thought it was a great idea but schools are unlikely to use the playground as an excursion as it’s expensive to hire buses and they have good playgrounds themselves. It could be tacked on as a reward for educational excursions.

Other comments:

 avoid shade cloth as it is a waste of money and including soft fall not sand;  there is a trend towards nature-based playgrounds but they can be expensive to maintain;  importance of playgrounds in high visibility areas and good pedestrian access;  playgrounds are good places for mothers to get out, but they must be age appropriate;

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

274 275 23

 adventure playgrounds are good. They are associated with educational outings, beach themes and nature, shells and turtles. They should be multi-sensory for kids with disabilities;  kids like obstacle courses, flying foxes, swings, monkey bars and swirling things that you have to jump onto.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

275 276 24

5. SUMMARY OF POSITIONS AND VALUES

People who support the concept of a People who don’t want a traditional playground on traditional playground being place here the Dripstone Cliffs picnic area Great idea This was a chance to do something unique Will be a place to take the kids, grandkids This is a place for adults (walking, jogging, drinking It will be great for family picnics wine at sunset) It will be good to have young kids playing Not the place for a playground here Council is wasting money Kids need to be active and have physical Go somewhere else exercise They’ve already made up their minds (being foisted on us) Will attract itinerants, hoons, traffic, litter Use the money to upgrade other playgrounds It’s setting a precedent (thin edge of the wedge) by excising land Intrusion on our lifestyle Will be unsafe without fencing and fencing will make it look like a prison Negative words used by opponents of this Negative words used by opponents of this position position Plastic, colourful, big, fenced, manicured, NIMBY intrusive

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

276 277 25

Summary of values

Values of supporters of the playground Values of people who live nearby/use the space, many of whom oppose the playground Families Nature = no fencing Place for family picnics Informality Safety = fencing Family picnics Darwin lifestyle – focus on families Open/outdoor spaces Challenging Peace and quiet Active Sunsets Making your own fun Playing ballgames on the lawn (Many would also share the values of the Views, coastal frontage other users of the space) The beach Easy lifestyle Warm weather Bushland Natural beauty of the reserve Landscape Close to town and the bush for kids It’s unique (nowhere else in Australia) Love going to the beach Relaxed Unspoilt Easy access Great place for kids to grow up Friendly Words that encapsulate values Recreation, fun, activity Conservation, natural

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

277 278 26

6. OPTIONS

What might be some compromises or trade offs that would make the proposal more acceptable?  smaller scale, more natural to blend in  moving closer to Trower Road to reduce proximity to the cliffs and interference with existing users  something unique and nature-based would create a more acceptable compromise and provide a better fit with the values of residents and current users

What alternatives might win greater support?  investing the money in existing parks, eg Anula Oval, which seems to be very popular, or the nearby Airlie Circuit playground  using this as a chance to work with Parks and Wildlife and the Surf Life Saving Club to rejuvenate Lions Park, although there was limited support for this venue in its current state  putting the money into bike paths or shared bicycle/walking tracks  transforming the ‘wasteland’ area between the carpark and Trower Road that is not used now (would need to ensure this created a pleasant view for residents and accommodated parking needs, would also need a toilet block)

Opportunities?  A lot of people saw Lions Park as an opportunity to do something unique and different while still providing something that is largely a traditional playground but one that everyone talks about.  It could be a playground that appeals to the values of the people who love nature, that caters for toddlers to teens and that transforms under- utilised land rather than posing a threat by taking over a space that is already popular and well-used.  Working on the area closer to Rapid Creek would provide a reason for people to walk and cycle from Nightcliff, which would increase the use of 1. Anula Oval playground this space that seems popular with itinerants 2. Airlie Circuit, Brinkin without putting pressure on car parking. 3. ‘wasteland’ area between  rejuvenating Lions Park to create a popular new Trower Road and carpark family space with easy access to the beach.

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

278 279 27

LIONS PARK

Darwin City Council Richardson Ward Regional Playground Consultation Plan

279 280

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/21 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

14 INFORMATION ITEMS AND CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED

Nil

15 REPORTS OF REPRESENTATIVES

16 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS

17 GENERAL BUSINESS

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/21 280 281

ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - OPEN SECTION PAGE COU01/22 TUESDAY, 31 JANUARY 2012

18 DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF NEXT ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING

THAT the next Ordinary Meeting of Council be held on Tuesday, 14 February 2012, at 5.00 p.m. (Open Section followed by the Confidential Section), Council Chambers, 1st Floor, Civic Centre, Harry Chan Avenue, Darwin.

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

19 CLOSURE OF MEETING TO THE PUBLIC

DECISION NO.20\() (31/01/12)

20 ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING AND MEDIA LIAISON

Eighty-Third Meeting of the Twentieth Council – Tuesday, 31 January 2012 PAGE COU01/22 281