First Record of the American Woodcock for California, with A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Record of the American Woodcock for California, with A FIRST RECORD OF THE AMERICAN WOODCOCK FOR CALWORNIA, wrrH A SUMMARY OF ITS STATUS IN WES NORTH AMERICA MICHAEL A. PATTEN,Department of Biology,University of California,Riverside, California 92521 GUY McCASKIE, 954 Grove Street, ImperialBeach, California91932 JOSEPH MORLAN, 380 Talbot Avenue#206, Pacifica,California 94044 On 3 November 1998, Patten, McCaskie,and Daniel S. Cooper discov- ered an AmericanWoodcock (Scolopax minor) at Iron MountainPumping Plantin southeasternSan BernardinoCounty, California. Patten first noted the birdat about0715 PST asit stoodin a yardbeneath a largeplanted elm. We subsequentlystudied it throughbinoculars for 15 minutesat closerange (5-10 m) as it waddledaround on a lawn and hid in an adjacentflowerbed; it alsoflew on two occasions.Viewing conditions were excellent(it wasclear and 55o-60 ø F, with a stiff Beaufort3-4 northerlywind). This woodcockcould not be locatedon 4 November(Walter Wehtje pers. comm.) or 5 November(fide Chet McGaugh).Patten rediscoveredit at 0830 PST on 7 November. Morlan, Robbie Fischer, and Karen Gilbert observedit later that day (1530-1700 PST). It couldnot be locatedon 8 November(Mike San Miguel pers. comm.)but was observedand photo- graphed(Figures 1-3) by Don Robersonduring the morning(0630-0730 PST) of 9 November.It was not seen thereafter(fide Larry Sansoneet al., pers. comm.). This bird representsthe first recordfor Californiaof an apparentlywild AmericanWoodcock. Furthermore, it appearsto representthe firstphoto- graphicallydocumented record of the specieswest of the continentaldivide. DESCRIPTION The followingdescription is from notes by Patten and Morlan, with supplementaryinformation from notesby McCaskie,Fischer, and Gilbert and photographsand notessupplied by Roberson: Behavior and Vocalizations. The woodcock wobbled about when it walked.Much of this movementwas a combineddipping and side-to-side wiggleof itsbody, with littlehead movement. It walkedand stood with itsbill pointeddownward at abouta 45 ø angleand slightlycocked its stubbytail. It roostedlike most birds,with its bill tuckeddeeply into its back feathers.It roostedon the groundin a shadyspot beneath low shrubs.It tendedto keep its eyesat leastpartly open even when roosting. This bird nevervocalized, although it did producea distinctivesound: the wingsemitted a strangelymusical whistling when it flew,a soundreminiscent of the wing whistleof a MourningDove (Zenaida macroura),but distinctly more trilledand squeaky. GeneralAppearance, Bare Parts, and Structure.The birdresembled a snipein its plumpbuild, short legs, short tail, and extremelylong bill. It was larger and stockierthan a Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago) in overall 156 WesternBirds 30:156-166, 1999 FIRST RECORD OF THE AMERICAN WOODCOCK FOR CALIFORNIA .? Figure 1. AmericanWoodcock at Iron MountainPumping Plant, San Bernardino County. California, 9 November 1998. The black barring on the rear crown is diagnosticof Scolopax. Photograph by Don Roberson Figure 2. American Woodcockat Iron Mountain Pumping Plant, San Bernardino County, California,9 November1998. Note the unbarredcinnamon underparts. Photographby Don Roberson 157 FIRST RECORD OF THE AMERICAN WOODCOCK FOR CALIFORNIA Figure 3. American Woodcockat Iron Mountain Pumping Plant, San Bernardino County,California, 9 November1998. Note the boldgray "V •' on the mantleand the gray stripesthrough the scapulars. Photograph by Don Roberson girth and mass.Furthermore, it was stockierthan a snipeand had a large head with prominentlarge blackeyes situated closer to the crown than on any bird we have seen. Itsbill was twice as long as the head,quite deep at itsbase, and dull pinkish on the basalone-third and gray-browndistally. We did not note differences in colorbetween the maxillaand mandible.The short,sturdy legs were dull grayishpink. It lookednearly tailless. On short,rounded wings, it flew as it stood, with its bill pointingdownward at a 45 ø angle. Plumage Pattern and Coloration. The bird had the typicalwoodcock plumagepattern (sharedby all six speciesof Scolopax):wide blackbars on the crownand nape, intricatelypatterned upperparts, and simplypatterned underparts. The head wasmostly unmarked rich buff (approachingpumpkin orange), emphasizingthe huge black eyes. The eyes were encircledby a nearly completeeye ring that was buff aboveand white with a bluishcast below. Thin rusty-buffbars narrowly separated three wide squared-off black bars on the nape and hindcrown:the top of the crownhad a fourthblack bar much narrower than the other three. A jagged black line through the eye was thickerand darker in the lores.Another dullerblack stripe was on the lower rear edge of the auriculars.The crownwas gray, contrastingwith the buff forehead,black nape bars, and buff auriculars. 158 FIRST RECORD OF THE AMERICAN WOODCOCK FOR CALIFORNIA The backfeathers were grayish with fine buffvermiculation on bothwebs. Each back featherwas narrowlyfringed with rich buff. The mantlewas framedby a broad pale gray stripeon either side (formedby the lower scapulars);these stripes formed a prominentpale "V" on the upperparts that wasreadily visible even when the birdroosted. The upperscapulars had blacklobate centers with pointedtips and notchededges. The wingcoverts were largelyrusty, frosted with gray. The covertshad a complexinternal pattern of blackmarks and lines. The underpartswere uniformunmarked rich buff from the chin to the undertailcoverts, save for a warm ruddywash on the sidesof the breastthat softlycontrasted with the remainderof the underparts.We did not note the patternon the undertailcoverts or the rectrices.The longuppertail coverts mostlyhid the tail,although black tips to the rectriceswere barely visible. The uppertailcoverts were buffwith coarseblackish transverse vermiculations. IDENTIFICATION SUMMARY Distinguishingthe AmericanWoodcock from the five other woodcock speciesis not difficult(Hayman et al. 1986). Three others,the Eurasian(S. rusticola), the Amami (S. mira) of the Ryukyu Islands,and the Dusky Woodcock(S. saturata) of Indonesia,have extensivelybarred underparts. The other two, the CelebesWoodcock (S. celebensis)of Sulawesiand the possiblyextinct Obi Woodcock(S. rochussenii)of the Moluccas,lack the boldgray "V" on the mantle,are larger,and have a differentbody color and featherpatterning. Ageingand sexing of the AmericanWoodcock are probablyimpossible in the field becausethe sexesare basicallyidentical (except for femalesbeing over 10% larger,with longerbills) and juvenileslook virtuallythe sameas adults(Martin 1964, Prater et al. 1977, Hayman et al. 1986:347). There may be some tendencyfor juvenilesto have a slightlygrayer chin, throat, and auriculars(Paulson 1993, Keppie and Whiting 1994). See the key in Martin (1964) or Sheldon(1967:203) for detailedinformation about ageing thisspecies in handby the patternon the inner secondaries. DISTRIBUTIONAL SUMMARY The American Woodcock occurs in North America east of the Great Plains. It breeds from southeasternManitoba east through the Maritime Provincesof Canadaand southnearly to the Gulf of Mexico (Nero 1977, 1986, Keppie and Whiting 1994, A.O.U. 1998). In recent decadesthe westernedge of its breedingrange has expanded slightly into easternNorth Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas,Oklahoma, and Texas(Smith and Barclay 1978). It wintersin the southernthird of itsbreeding range, south to the Gulf Coastand throughcentral Texas sparingly to the lower Rio Grandevalley (Keppieand Whiting 1994). The AmericanWoodcock has been recorded west of its normalrange on over 30 occasions(Appendix), mainly east of the continentaldivide (Fig- ure 4). There are recordsfor Saskatchewan,Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, 159 ß : o ß 2 records ß ß 0 ß 3 records ß , oßß 14 recordrecords Figure4. Westernedge (dotted line) of regularbreeding and wintering distribution of the AmericanWoodcock (S½olopax minor) and locations of extralimitalrecords in the westernUnited States and Canada(Appendix). Solid circles represent well-docu- mentedor generallyaccepted records. Empty circlesrepresent hypothetical or questionablereports. Note that the vast majority of extralimitalrecords are eastof the continentaldivide (gray line). 160 FIRST RECORD OF THE AMERICAN WOODCOCK FOR CALIFORNIA New Mexico,and the trans-Pecosregion of Texas(Hubbard 1978, DeSante and Pyle 1986, Andrewsand Righter 1992, Smith 1996, Petersonand Zimmer1998). Manyreports for Coloradoand Saskatchewan are problem- atic,and all reportsfor Albertaare generally treated as hypothetical (Salt and Salt 1976:492, Pinel et al. 1991, Semenchuk1992, cf. A.O.U. 1998). This specieshas wanderedsouth of its normalrange to Bermuda(A.O.U. 1998) and in Mexicoto San LuisPotosf, Tamaulipas, and eventhe Yucatan Peninsula(Howell and Webb 1995). It has appeared sporadicallyduring migrationnortheast of its usualrange on the islandsof St. Pierre and Miquelon(Tuck and Borota 1972). There were only four well-documentedrecords of the AmericanWood- cock west of the continentaldivide prior to the California record: sight recordsfor western Montana at Ninemile Creek (Bergeronet al. 1992, Paulson1993) and Eureka (Wright 1996), along Sacaton Creek, New Mexico, within sightof Arizona (S. O. Williamsin litt.), and at Jackson, Wyoming(J. Pridayin litt.). A sightreport from coastal British Columbia is treatedas validby Paulson(1993) but as hypotheticalby Campbellet al. (1990); we followthe latter.There is alsoa hypotheticalreport for southeast- ern Arizona(Monson and Phillips1981) that has not been reviewedby the Arizona Bird Committee and is thus not on its
Recommended publications
  • Bird Studies Overview
    Chapter 7. Bird Studies Overview teigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge provides a variety of habitats for many species of birds. Thousands of breeding birds rely on the resources of the refuge to Srest, eat, and raise their young. In addition, the refuge supports wetlands that are vital to the survival of migratory birds. The activities that follow offer an excellent opportunity for students to learn about and to observe the different species of birds — their behaviors and adaptations to the habitats on the refuge. Background The actively managed refuge wetlands and grasslands, when combined with the natural floodplain vegetative communities, provide habitat that supports over 200 species of birds. Hundreds of thousands of birds migrate along the lower Columbia River every year. The refuge hosts thousands of migratory birds that fly thousands of miles from their breeding grounds in Arctic Canada and Alaska to their wintering grounds in Baja California or South America, a route known as the Pacific Flyway. The few remaining areas of wetland habitat along the lower Columbia River are vital to the flyway. Some birds spend their winter on refuge wetlands, returning north to nest; some nest here but migrate to milder climates in the south for the winter; and some do not migrate at all but remain in the area as permanent residents. Several of the songbirds found in the summer spend our winters in Central and South America, migrating thousands of miles annually between their summer and winter habitats. Birds using the refuge are specifically adapted to the type of food they eat and the type of habitat they occupy (open water, freshwater wetland, field, riparian woodland, or upland woodland).
    [Show full text]
  • 03/16/2020 9:21 Am
    ACTION: Withdraw Proposed DATE: 03/16/2020 9:21 AM 1501:31-7-05 Seasons and limits on rail, common snipe (Wilson's snipe), woodcock, gallinules (common moorhens), teal, geese and mourning doves. (A) Throughout the state, it shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, kill, wound, take, or attempt to take, or to possess any of the migratory game birds specified in this rule except as provided in this rule or other rules of the Administrative Code. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess any rails except sora and Virginia, which may be hunted and taken from September 1, 20192020 through November 9, 20192020. (2) It shall be unlawful for any person to take or possess more than twenty-five rails singly or in the aggregate in one day, or to possess more than seventy-five rails singly or in the aggregate at anytime after the second day. (3) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess common snipe (Wilson's snipe) at any time, except from September 1, 20192020 through November 26, 201924, 2020 and December 14, 201912, 2020 through January 2December 31, 2020. (4) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, take, or possess woodcock at any time, except from October 12, 201910, 2020 through November 25, 201923, 2020. (5) It shall be unlawful for any person to hunt or take rails, common snipe (Wilson's snipe), woodcock, or gallinules (common moorhens) at any time, except from sunrise to sunset daily during the open season.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruffed Grouse and American Woodcock Status in Michigan, 2017
    Printed by Authority of: P.A. 451 of 1994 Total Number of Copies Printed: 207 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Cost per Copy:................................$0.84 Wildlife Report No. 3642 Total Cost: ................................... $174.00 September 2017 Michigan Department of Natural Resources RUFFED GROUSE AND AMERICAN WOODCOCK STATUS IN MICHIGAN, 2017 C. Alan Stewart and Lori Sargent ABSTRACT Hunter cooperator surveys, spring breeding surveys, and mail harvest surveys are conducted each year to monitor Ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) and American woodcock (Scolopax minor) populations. Annual data comparisons are described for hunter cooperator survey (2015–2016), Ruffed grouse drumming survey (2015-2016), American woodcock spring breeding surveys (2016-2017), and mail harvest survey (2010-2011). Ruffed grouse cooperators hunting the first 4 days of ruffed grouse season reported an average 1.93 grouse per hour in 2016 compared to 0.91 grouse per hour in 2015. The usual spring drumming grouse surveys were not conducted this year because of concerns over past open records requests from a hunter whose activities jeopardized the validity of the survey. There was an increase detected in Michigan’s woodcock index based on the singing-ground survey from 2016-2017 and during the ten-year trend from 2007-2017. Significant long-term (1968-2017) declines were detected regionally and statewide, respectively. Woodcock banders in Michigan spent 1,950 hours afield in 2017 and banded 937 chicks. There were about 67 chicks observed and 48 chicks banded per 100 hours of search time, compared to 66 chicks observed and 49 banded in 2016. There were 112 ruffed grouse drumming routes surveyed in 2015 and 105 in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • View) from Be Sourced up Until the End of November to Try Collapsed Drains and Was Mostly Covered in and Limit Regrowth of Vegetation
    Conservation Evidence (2006) 3, 79-80 www.ConservationEvidence.com The effectiveness of opening up rush patches on encouraging breeding common snipe Gallinago gallinago at Rogersceugh Farm, Campfield Marsh RSPB reserve, Cumbria, England Holton N. & Allcorn R.I. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2GL, UK SUMMARY An area of improved grassland was dominated by rushes Juncus spp. and purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea . In order to try and attract breeding common snipe Gallinago gallinago , the rush was cut in 2003 with tractor mounted mowers and then grazed. In addition, 18 small scrapes were dug and higher water levels were maintained. The number of snipe increased from one nesting pair in 2003 to 11 nesting pairs in both 2004 and 2005. BACKGROUND Throughout the UK, common snipe Gallinago gallinago are undergoing a large population decline of between 25-49% in both breeding population and range over the last 25 years. Snipe feed by probing for invertebrates deep in soft, damp soil using their long bills. They also require wet marshy grassland areas with tussocks of taller vegetation for nesting. ACTION Figure 1 . All the rush on the improved grassland was cut with tractor mounted mowers. Study site: Rogersceugh Farm in Cumbria, north-west England, is a traditionally managed farm incorporating approximately 60 ha of waist high rush Juncus spp. and purple moor- reclaimed peatland. The RSPB purchased the grass Molinia caerulea . A breeding wader farm in order to raise water levels on the survey was carried out in 2003 prior to the adjacent raised mire whilst at the same time purchase of the farm by the RSPB.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland
    Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland ANDREW N. HOODLESS,1 Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK CHRISTOPHER J. HEWARD, Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK ABSTRACT Migration represents a critical time in the annual cycle of Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), with poten- tial consequences for individual fitness and survival. In October–December, Eurasian woodcock migrate from breeding grounds in northern Eurasia over thousands of kilometres to western Europe, returning in March–May. The species is widely hunted in Europe, with 2.3–3.5 million individuals shot per year; hence, an understanding of the timing of migra- tion and routes taken is an essential part of developing sustainable flyway management. Our aims were to determine the timing and migration routes of Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland, and to assess the degree of connec- tivity between breeding and wintering sites. We present data from 52 Eurasian woodcock fitted with satellite tags in late winter 2012–2016, which indicate that the timing of spring departure varied annually and was positively correlated with temperature, with a mean departure date of 26 March (± 1.4 days SE). Spring migration distances averaged 2,851 ± 165 km (SE), with individuals typically making 5 stopovers. The majority of our sample of tagged Eurasian woodcock migrated to breeding sites in northwestern Russia (54%), with smaller proportions breeding in Denmark, Scandinavia, and Finland (29%); Poland, Latvia, and Belarus (9.5%); and central Russia (7.5%). The accumulated migration routes of tagged individ- uals suggest a main flyway for Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland through Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, and then dividing to pass through the countries immediately north and south of the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruffed Grouse
    Ruffed Grouse Photo Courtesy of the Ruffed Grouse Society Introduction The ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) is North America’s most widely distributed game bird. As a very popular game species, the grouse is in the same family as the wild turkey, quail and pheasant. They range from Alaska to Georgia including 34 states and all the Canadian provinces. Historically in Indiana, its range included the forested regions of the state. Today the range is limited to the south central and southeastern 1/3 of the state in the southern hill country, with a few pockets in counties bordering Michigan. Ruffed grouse weigh between 1 and 1.5 pounds and grow to 17 inches in length with a 22-inch wingspan. They exhibit color phases with northern range birds being reddish-brown to gray while those in the southern part of their continental range, including Indiana, are red. History and Current Status Before settlement, grouse populations ranged throughout the hardwood region of the state. In areas where timber was permanently removed for farms, homes and towns grouse habitat has been lost. During the early1900’s, many farms in the south-central portion of Indiana were abandoned. As a result of this farm abandonment, the vegetation around old home sites and in the fallow fields grew through early plant succession stages. About the same time, the reforestation era began as abandoned farms reverted into public ownership under the management of state and federal natural resource agencies. By the 1950’s, natural succession, reforestation, and timber harvest management were beginning to form a myriad of early successional forest patches across a fairly contiguous forested landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Upland Management Practices on Avian Diversity
    The Effects of Upland Management Practices on Avian diversity Bronwen Daniel September 2010 A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science and the Diploma of Imperial College London 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Background................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Birds as indicators ................................................................................................................ 11 2.1.1 Upland birds ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Management Practices......................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Grouse Moor Management........................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Predator control ............................................................................................................ 16 2.2.3 Burning .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Grazing Pressure............................................................................................................ 17 2.2.5 Implications of upland management for bird populations ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Information Needs for American Woodcock a FUNDING STRATEGY
    Priority Information Needs for American Woodcock A FUNDING STRATEGY Developed by the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies’ Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Support Task Force. March 15, 2010 D.J. Case and Associates (editor). 2010. Priority Information Needs for American Woodcock: A Funding Strategy. Developed for the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies by the Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Support Task Force. 16pp. Priority Information Needs for American Woodcock A Funding Strategy Developed by the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies’ Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Support Task Force Compiled and Edited by David J. Case and Sarah J. Sanders D.J. Case & Associates March 15, 2010 Photo credits: Top row: left by Rucker Sewell; right by paco lypic Second row: CC Chapman Third row: Ren West Fourth row: atlantic life Illustration of American woodcock by Bob Hines, USFWS Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary . i Introduction . 1 Status of American Woodcock. 1 Priority Information Needs . 6 Priority 1. Develop a demographic-based model for assessing American woodcock population response to harvest and habitat management . 6 Priority 2. Develop communication strategies to increase support for policies and practices that benefit American woodcock and other wildlife of young forests . 7 Priority 3. Improve understanding of migration, breeding, and wintering habitat quality for American woodcock . 9 Priority 4. Improve the Singing-ground Survey . 11 Measuring Success . 13 Literature Cited . 15 Appendix A: 2009 Workshop Participants . 16 Figure 1. American woodcock management regions, breeding range, and Singing-ground Survey coverage and winter range . 2 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix, French Names, Supplement
    685 APPENDIX Part 1. Speciesreported from the A.O.U. Check-list area with insufficient evidencefor placementon the main list. Specieson this list havebeen reported (published) as occurring in the geographicarea coveredby this Check-list.However, their occurrenceis considered hypotheticalfor one of more of the following reasons: 1. Physicalevidence for their presence(e.g., specimen,photograph, video-tape, audio- recording)is lacking,of disputedorigin, or unknown.See the Prefacefor furtherdiscussion. 2. The naturaloccurrence (unrestrained by humans)of the speciesis disputed. 3. An introducedpopulation has failed to becomeestablished. 4. Inclusionin previouseditions of the Check-listwas basedexclusively on recordsfrom Greenland, which is now outside the A.O.U. Check-list area. Phoebastria irrorata (Salvin). Waved Albatross. Diornedeairrorata Salvin, 1883, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 430. (Callao Bay, Peru.) This speciesbreeds on Hood Island in the Galapagosand on Isla de la Plata off Ecuador, and rangesat seaalong the coastsof Ecuadorand Peru. A specimenwas takenjust outside the North American area at Octavia Rocks, Colombia, near the Panama-Colombiaboundary (8 March 1941, R. C. Murphy). There are sight reportsfrom Panama,west of Pitias Bay, Dari6n, 26 February1941 (Ridgely 1976), and southwestof the Pearl Islands,27 September 1964. Also known as GalapagosAlbatross. ThalassarchechrysosWma (Forster). Gray-headed Albatross. Diornedeachrysostorna J. R. Forster,1785, M6m. Math. Phys. Acad. Sci. Paris 10: 571, pl. 14. (voisinagedu cerclepolaire antarctique & dansl'Ocean Pacifique= Isla de los Estados[= StatenIsland], off Tierra del Fuego.) This speciesbreeds on islandsoff CapeHorn, in the SouthAtlantic, in the southernIndian Ocean,and off New Zealand.Reports from Oregon(mouth of the ColumbiaRiver), California (coastnear Golden Gate), and Panama(Bay of Chiriqu0 are unsatisfactory(see A.O.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife in Your Young Forest.Pdf
    WILDLIFE IN YOUR Young Forest 1 More Wildlife in Your Woods CREATE YOUNG FOREST AND ENJOY THE WILDLIFE IT ATTRACTS WHEN TO EXPECT DIFFERENT ANIMALS his guide presents some of the wildlife you may used to describe this dense, food-rich habitat are thickets, T see using your young forest as it grows following a shrublands, and early successional habitat. timber harvest or other management practice. As development has covered many acres, and as young The following lists focus on areas inhabited by the woodlands have matured to become older forest, the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis), a rare amount of young forest available to wildlife has dwindled. native rabbit that lives in parts of New York east of the Having diverse wildlife requires having diverse habitats on Hudson River, and in parts of Connecticut, Rhode Island, the land, including some young forest. Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, and southern Maine. In this region, conservationists and landowners In nature, young forest is created by floods, wildfires, storms, are carrying out projects to create the young forest and and beavers’ dam-building and feeding. To protect lives and shrubland that New England cottontails need to survive. property, we suppress floods, fires, and beaver activities. Such projects also help many other kinds of wildlife that Fortunately, we can use habitat management practices, use the same habitat. such as timber harvests, to mimic natural disturbance events and grow young forest in places where it will do the most Young forest provides abundant food and cover for insects, good. These habitat projects boost the amount of food reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergetics-Of-American-Woodcock
    BIOENERGETICS OF AI\,ÍERICAN IVOoDcocK DURING THE BREEDING SEASON ON MOOSEHORN NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, MAINE By William Matthew Vander Haegen B.S. University of Massachusetts, 1983 M.S. University of Massachusetts, 1987 A DISSERTATTON Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in \ilildlife) The Graduate School, University of Maine May 7992 Advisory Committee: William B. Krohn, Professor of Wildlife and l-eader, Maine c-ooperative Fish and wildlife Research unit (co-chairman) g._ luy Owen, Jr., Professor of Wildlife (Co-chairman) Frederick H. Servello, Assistant Professor of Wildlife Wìlliap E. Glana Associate Professor of Zoology 'White, Alan S. Associate Professor of Forest Rèiources BIOENERGETICS OF AI\4ERICAN WOODCOCK DURING THE BREEDING SEA.SON ON MOOSEHORN NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, MAINE by William Matthew Vander Haegen Thesis advisors: Williem B. Krohn, ph.D. Ray B. Owen, Jr., Ph.D. An abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in Wildlife). May,1992 Bioenergetics of female American woodcock (fulgE minor) was studied from 1987-1989 at Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge, Maine. A model of daily enerry expenditure was developed from laboratory-derived data on metabolic rates; from data on activity and microclimates collected in the field; and from body component analysis of collected birds. Enerry demands incurred by female woodcock on the breeding grounds were highest during the Pre-nesting (60.3 kcaVday) and Iaying (S9.1 kcaVday) periods. Availability of food (earthworms [Lumbricidae]) is normally sufficient during these periods, but shortages such as the one caused by persistent soil frost in spring of 1989 can delay nesting and affect productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • HANDBOOK 2018 Taking a Look Back! the First South Dakota Pheasant Hunting Season Was a One-Day Hunt Held in Spink County on October 3O, 1919
    Hunting and trapping HANDBOOK 2018 Taking a look back! The first South Dakota pheasant hunting season was a one-day hunt held in Spink County on October 3O, 1919. Help the South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks tip our blaze orange caps to the past 100 years of Outdoor Tradition, and start celebrating the next century. Show us how you are joining in on the fun by using #MySDTradition when sharing all your South Dakota experiences. Look to the past, and step into the future with South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks. Photo: South Dakota State Historical Society SOUTH DAKOTA GAME, FISH & PARKS HUNTING HANDBOOK CONSERVATION OFFICER DISTRICTS GENERAL INFORMATION: 605.223.7660 TTY: 605.223.7684, email: [email protected] Aberdeen: 605.626.2391, 5850 E. Hwy 12 Pierre: 605.773.3387, 523 E. Capitol Ave. Chamberlain: 605.734.4530, 1550 E. King Ave. Rapid City: 605.394.2391, 4130 Adventure Trail Ft. Pierre: 605.223.7700, 20641 SD Hwy 1806 Sioux Falls: 605.362.2700, 4500 S. Oxbow Ave. Huron: 605.353.7145, 895 3rd Street SW Watertown: 605.882.5200, 400 West Kemp Mobridge: 605.845.7814, 909 Lake Front Drive Webster: 605.345.3381, 603 E. 8th Ave. CONSERVATION OFFICERS *denotes District Conservation Officer Supervisor Martin Tom Beck 605.381.6433 Britton Casey Dowler 605.881.3775 Hill City Jeff Edwards 605.381.9995 Webster Austin Norton 605.881.2177 Hot Springs D.J. Schroeder 605.381.6438 Sisseton Dean Shultz 605.881.3773 Custer Ron Tietsort 605.431.7048 Webster Michael Undlin 605.237.3275 Spearfish Brian Meiers* 605.391.6023 Aberdeen Tim McCurdy* 605.380.4572
    [Show full text]