DOCSLIB.ORG

Chulanova, Tatiana Ph.D., August 2020 Translation Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CHULANOVA, TATIANA PH.D., AUGUST 2020 TRANSLATION STUDIES THE POLITICS OF PARATEXTS: FRAMING TRANSLATIONS IN THE SOVIET JOURNAL INOSTRANNAIA LITERATURA Dissertation Advisor: Brian James Baer The role of translation in periodicals has recently attracted the attention of Translation Studies scholars (e.g., Baer 2016; Lygo 2016, and Bollaert 2019). However, there has not been a comprehensive study of the role of paratexts in framing translations published in Soviet periodicals during the post-Stalinist periods referred to as the Thaw, Stagnation, and Perestroika. Drawing on paratext theory (Genette 1997), narrative theory, frame analysis (Baker 2006), and thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006), the present study investigates the role played by paratexts in framing the translations published in the Soviet thick journal Inostrannaia Literatura between 1955 and 1991. Analysis of the 777 paratexts reveals that the journal played an important role in acquainting Soviet readers with foreign works in translation and in shaping the readers’ view of the other countries, in particular, the countries of the West. The analysis of the thematic content of the corpus shows that the representation of the West changed from a negative to a more positive one and that coverage of the author’s political engagement decreased over time, whereas coverage of translation-related issues increased. The analysis of the framing strategies used by the journal in its paratexts, such as selective appropriation, temporal and spatial framing, labelling, and repositioning of participants, allowed for the inclusion of foreign works that might otherwise have been banned by censors. THE POLITICS OF PARATEXTS: FRAMING TRANSLATIONS IN THE SOVIET JOURNAL INOSTRANNAIA LITERATURA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Tatiana Chulanova August 2020 © Copyright All Rights Reserved Dissertation written by Tatiana Chulanova B.A., Voronezh State Pedagogical University, Russia 2000 M.A., Kent State University, USA, 2008 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2020 Approved by _____________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Brian James Baer _____________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Joanna Trzeciak Huss _____________________ Dr. Judy Wakabayashi _____________________ Dr. Andrew Barnes _____________________ Dr. Martha C. Merrill Accepted by _____________________, Chair, Department of Modern and Classical Language Studies Dr. Keiran Dunne _____________________, Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................x LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ xii DEDICATION ............................................................................................................. xiii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 1.2 Significance of the Study .............................................................................................5 1.3 Research Questions .....................................................................................................6 1.4 A Note on Transliteration and Translation ...................................................................6 1.5 Organization of Dissertation ........................................................................................7 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................8 2.1 Narrative Theory and Framing in Translation Studies .................................................8 2.1.1 Narratives in the Social Sciences ..................................................................8 2.1.2 Narratives in Translation and Interpreting Studies ...................................... 14 2.1.3 Framing ....................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Paratexts in Translation Studies ................................................................................. 21 2.2.1 Genette’s Concept of Paratext ..................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Paratexts in Translation Studies Research ................................................... 25 2.3 Periodical in Translation Studies ............................................................................... 29 v 2.3.1 Background ................................................................................................. 29 2.3.2 The Journal as Agent .................................................................................. 31 2.3.3 ‘Thick’ Journals .......................................................................................... 33 2.3.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 36 2.4 Inostrannaia Literatura and Its Predecessors............................................................. 36 2.4.1 Vestnik inostrannoi literatury (Herald of Foreign Literature) ...................... 37 2.4.2 Literatura mirovoi revolutsii (Literature of the World Revolution)............. 41 2.4.3 Internatsional’naia literatura (International Literature) ............................. 42 2.5 Soviet and Translated Literature in the Context of Socialist Realism ........................ 45 2.5.1 Translation and its Contexts ........................................................................ 45 2.5.2 Socialist Realism: History and Governing Principles .................................. 50 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 55 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 55 3.2 Positioning the Researcher ......................................................................................... 55 3.3 Managing Subjectivity in Qualitative Research ......................................................... 59 3.4 Periodization .............................................................................................................. 62 3.5 Quantitative Data Analysis ........................................................................................ 67 3.6 Qualitative Data Analysis .......................................................................................... 68 3.6.1 Paratexts as a Site of Framing Translations ................................................. 69 3.6.2 Framing Strategies ...................................................................................... 71 3.6.3 Thematic Analysis ...................................................................................... 73 CHAPTER 4 QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS………………………………...76 vi 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 76 4.2 Data Collection Method and Instruments ................................................................... 76 4.3 Discussion of the Findings of the Quantitative Data Analysis ................................... 79 4.3.1 Total Number of Works with and without Paratexts ................................... 79 4.3.2 Types of Paratext ........................................................................................ 82 4.3.3 Addressers of the Paratexts ......................................................................... 84 4.3.4 Length of the Paratexts ............................................................................... 85 4.3.5 Source-Text Languages ............................................................................... 90 4.3.5.1 Source-Text Languages and Their Corresponding Countries ....... 91 4.3.5.2 Source-Text Countries and Languages Across the Three Historical Periods ................................................................................................................. 93 4.3.5.3 Some Reflection on the Editors and Changes in Paratextual Practice ................................................................................................................ 97 4.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 99 CHAPTER 5 THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE PARATEXTUAL DATA……...102 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 102 5.2 Data Analysis Methods and Instruments .................................................................. 102 5.3 Thematic Analysis: Overview .................................................................................. 103 5.3.1 Choice of Themes ..................................................................................... 103 5.3.2 Six Phases of Thematic Analysis .............................................................. 107 5.3.3 Overview of the Themes ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Tragedy, Euripides, Melodrama: Hamartia, Medea, Liminality

    Tragedy, Euripides, Melodrama: Hamartia, Medea, Liminality

    Vol. 5 (2013) | pp. 143-171 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_AMAL.2013.v5.42932 TRAGEDY, EURIPIDES, MELODRAMA: HAMARTIA, MEDEA, LIMINALITY BRIAN G. CARAHER QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELAND [email protected] Article received on 29.01.2013 Accepted on 06.07.2013 ABSTRACT This article examines socio-historical dimensions and cultural and dramaturgic implications of the Greek playwright Euripides’ treatment of the myth of Medea. Euripides gives voice to victims of adventurism, aggression and betrayal in the name of ‘reason’ and the ‘state’ or ‘polity.’ Medea constitutes one of the most powerful mythic forces to which he gave such voice by melodramatizing the disturbing liminality of Greek tragedy’s perceived social and cultural order. The social polity is confronted by an apocalyptic shock to its order and its available modes of emotional, rational and social interpretation. Euripidean melodramas of horror dramatize the violation of rational categories and precipitate an abject liminality of the tragic vision of rational order. The dramaturgy of Euripides’ Medea is contrasted with the norms of Greek tragedy and examined in comparison with other adaptations — both ancient and contemporary — of the myth of Medea, in order to unfold the play’s transgression of a tragic vision of the social polity. KEYWORDS Dramaturgy, Euripides, liminality, Medea, melodrama, preternatural powers, social polity, tragedy. TRAGEDIA, EURÍPIDES, MELODRAMA: HAMARTÍA, MEDEA, LIMINALIDAD RESUMEN Este artículo estudia las dimensiones sociohistóricas y las implicaciones culturales y teatrales del tratamiento que Eurípides da al mito de Medea. Eurípides da voz a las víctimas del aventurerismo, de las agresiones y de las traiciones cometidas en nombre de la ‘razón’ y del ‘estado’ o el ‘gobierno’.
  • Digital Fanfic in Negotiation: Livejournal, Archive of Our Own, and the Affordances of Read-Write Platforms

    Digital Fanfic in Negotiation: Livejournal, Archive of Our Own, and the Affordances of Read-Write Platforms

    Digital fanfic in negotiation: LiveJournal, Archive of our Own, and the affordances of read-write platforms. Introduction Fanfiction is the unauthorized rewriting or adaptation of popular media narratives, utilizing corporately owned characters, settings and storylines to tell an individual writer’s own story (self-ref, 2017). It is often abbreviated to fanfic or even fic, and exists in a thoroughly grey legal area between copyright infringement and fair use (Tushnet 1997, McCardle 2011). Though there were a few cases of cease-and-desist letters sent to fan writers in the twentieth century, media corporations now understand it is useless to attempt to prosecute fanfic writers – for one thing, there are simply too many of us,1 and for another it would be terrible publicity. Though modern fanfic can be reliably dated to the 1960s (Jenkins 1992), it is now primarily an online practice, and the fastest growing form of writing in the world (self ref). This paper uses participant observation and online ethnography to explore how fanfiction archives utilize digital affordances. Following Murray, I will argue that a robust understanding of digital read-write platforms needs to account for the social and legal context of digital fiction as well as its technological affordances. Whilst the online platform LiveJournal in some ways channels user creativity towards a more self-evidentially ‘digital’ texts than its successor in the Archive of Our Own (A03), the Archive encourages greater reader interactivity at the level of archive and sorting. I will demonstrate that in some ways, the A03 recoups some of the cultural capital and use value of print.
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W

    The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W

    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
  • The Significance of Anime As a Novel Animation Form, Referencing Selected Works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii

    The Significance of Anime As a Novel Animation Form, Referencing Selected Works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii

    The significance of anime as a novel animation form, referencing selected works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii Ywain Tomos submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Aberystwyth University Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, September 2013 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 1 This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. 2 Acknowledgements I would to take this opportunity to sincerely thank my supervisors, Elin Haf Gruffydd Jones and Dr Dafydd Sills-Jones for all their help and support during this research study. Thanks are also due to my colleagues in the Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, Aberystwyth University for their friendship during my time at Aberystwyth. I would also like to thank Prof Josephine Berndt and Dr Sheuo Gan, Kyoto Seiko University, Kyoto for their valuable insights during my visit in 2011. In addition, I would like to express my thanks to the Coleg Cenedlaethol for the scholarship and the opportunity to develop research skills in the Welsh language. Finally I would like to thank my wife Tomoko for her support, patience and tolerance over the last four years – diolch o’r galon Tomoko, ありがとう 智子.
  • Woodcuts to Wrapping Paper: Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Prints Alison Buinicky Dickinson College

    Woodcuts to Wrapping Paper: Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Prints Alison Buinicky Dickinson College

    Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Student Scholarship & Creative Works By Year Student Scholarship & Creative Works 1-28-2005 Woodcuts to Wrapping Paper: Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Prints Alison Buinicky Dickinson College Sarah Rachel Burger Dickinson College Blair Hetherington Douglas Dickinson College Michelle Erika Garman Dickinson College Danielle Marie Gower Dickinson College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.dickinson.edu/student_work Part of the Contemporary Art Commons Recommended Citation Hirsh, Sharon, et al. Woodcuts to Wrapping Paper: Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Prints. Carlisle, Pa.: The rT out Gallery, Dickinson College, 2005. This Exhibition Catalog is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship & Creative Works at Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship & Creative Works By Year by an authorized administrator of Dickinson Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Alison Buinicky, Sarah Rachel Burger, Blair Hetherington Douglas, Michelle Erika Garman, Danielle Marie Gower, Blair Lesley Harris, Laura Delong Heffelfinger, Saman Mohammad Khan, Ryan McNally, Erin Elizabeth Mounts, Nora Marisa Mueller, Alexandra Thayer, Heather Jean Tilton, Sharon L. Hirsh, and Trout Gallery This exhibition catalog is available at Dickinson Scholar: http://scholar.dickinson.edu/student_work/9 WOODCUTS TO Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Wrapping Paper Prints WOODCUTS TO Concepts of Originality in Contemporary Wrapping Paper Prints January 28 – March 5, 2005 Curated by: Alison Buinicky Sarah Burger Blair H. Douglas Michelle E. Garman Danielle M. Gower Blair L. Harris Laura D. Heffelfinger Saman Khan Ryan McNally Erin E. Mounts Nora M.
  • An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balancing Public and Private Interests Amanda Schreyer

    An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balancing Public and Private Interests Amanda Schreyer

    Cybaris® Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 3 2015 An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balancing Public and Private Interests Amanda Schreyer Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cybaris Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Schreyer, Amanda (2015) "An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balancing Public and Private Interests," Cybaris®: Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cybaris/vol6/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cybaris® by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Schreyer: An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balanci Published by Mitchell Hamline Open Access, 2015 1 Cybaris®, Vol. 6, Iss. 1 [2015], Art. 3 AN OVERVIEW OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR FICTIONAL CHARACTERS: BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS † AMANDA SCHREYER I. Fictional Characters and the Law .............................................. 52! II. Legal Basis for Protecting Characters ...................................... 53! III. Copyright Protection of Characters ........................................ 57! A. Literary Characters Versus Visual Characters ............... 60! B. Component Parts of Characters Can Be Separately Copyrightable ................................................................
  • PARATEXTUALITY and the LOST URTEXT Anthony Enns the Term

    PARATEXTUALITY and the LOST URTEXT Anthony Enns the Term

    ANTHONY ENNS PARATEXTUALITY AND THE LOST URTEXT Anthony Enns The term “paratext” refers to the elements of a literary work that ac- company the text but are not considered part of the text itself, such as title pages, introductions, annotations, appendices, etc. Gérard Genette famously described the paratext as the “threshold…between the inside and the outside” of a text, and this threshold represents “a privileged place of a pragmatics and a strategy, of an influence on the public, an influence that…is at the service of a better reception for the text and a more pertinent reading of it” (2). In other words, the contextual information and critical commentary provided in the paratext ultimately serves the author’s own interests by ensuring that the text is interpreted correctly: “The way to get a proper reading is…to put the (definitely assumed) reader in possession of information the author considers necessary for this proper reading…[such as information] about the way the author wishes to be read” (209). Genette also noted that paratextual elements have expanded over time in order to satisfy “the educated public’s growing curiosity about the ‘making’ of the text and about the unearthing of versions the author had abandoned” (339). Paratexts were thus increasingly seen as necessary “supplements” or “acces- sories” to a literary work, and a text without a paratext is now viewed as “a power disabled…like an elephant without a mahout” (410). If a text without a paratext is “an elephant without a mahout,” then a “paratext without its text is a mahout without an elephant,” which Gen- ette dismissed as “a silly show” (410).
  • 2. Case Study: Anime Music Videos

    2. Case Study: Anime Music Videos

    2. CASE STUDY: ANIME MUSIC VIDEOS Dana Milstein When on 1 August 1981 at 12:01 a.m. the Buggles’ ‘Video Killed the Radio Star’ aired as MTV’s first music video, its lyrics parodied the very media pre- senting it: ‘We can’t rewind, we’ve gone too far, . put the blame on VTR.’ Influenced by J. G. Ballard’s 1960 short story ‘The Sound Sweep’, Trevor Horn’s song voiced anxiety over the dystopian, artificial world developing as a result of modern technology. Ballard’s story described a world in which natu- rally audible sound, particularly song, is considered to be noise pollution; a sound sweep removes this acoustic noise on a daily basis while radios broad- cast a silent, rescored version of music using a richer, ultrasonic orchestra that subconsciously produces positive feelings in its listeners. Ballard was particu- larly criticising technology’s attempt to manipulate the human voice, by con- tending that the voice as a natural musical instrument can only be generated by ‘non-mechanical means which the neruophonic engineer could never hope, or bother, to duplicate’ (Ballard 2006: 150). Similarly, Horn professed anxiety over a world in which VTRs (video tape recorders) replace real-time radio music with simulacra of those performances. VTRs allowed networks to replay shows, to cater to different time zones, and to rerecord over material. Indeed, the first VTR broadcast occurred on 25 October 1956, when a recording of guest singer Dorothy Collins made the previous night was broadcast ‘live’ on the Jonathan Winters Show. The business of keeping audiences hooked 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, promoted the concept of quantity over quality: yes- terday’s information was irrelevant and could be permanently erased after serving its money-making purpose.
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction

    ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction

    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
  • 155 Words to Describe an Author's Tone

    155 Words to Describe an Author's Tone

    155 Words to Describe an Author's Tone What is tone? Tone refers to an author’s use of words and writing style to convey his or her attitude towards a topic. Tone is often defined as what the author feels about the subject. What the reader feels is known as the mood. Tip: Don’t confuse tone with voice. Voice can be explained as the author’s personality expressed in writing. Tone = Attitude. Voice = Personality. Tone (attitude) and voice (personality) create a writing style. You may not be able to alter your personality but you can adjust your attitude. This gives you ways to create writing that affects your audience’s mood. The mechanics Tone is conveyed through diction (choice and use of words and phrases), viewpoint, syntax (grammar; how you put words and phrases together), and level of formality. It is the way you express yourself in speech or writing. How do you find the correct tone? You can usually find a tone by asking these three questions: 1. Why am I writing this? 2. Who is my intended audience? 3. What do I want the reader to learn, understand, or think about? In formal writing, your tone should be clear, concise, confident, and courteous. The writing level should be sophisticated, but not pretentious. In creative writing, your tone is more subjective, but you should always aim to communicate clearly. Genre sometimes determines the tone. Tone Meaning Absurd illogical; ridiculous; silly; implausible; foolish Accusatory suggesting someone has done something wrong, complaining Acerbic sharp; forthright; biting; hurtful; abrasive;
  • Life of John H.W. Hawkins

    Life of John H.W. Hawkins

    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES I LIFE JOHN H. W. HAWKINS COMPILED BY HIS SON, REV. WILLIAM GEOEGE HAWKINS, A.M. "The noble self the conqueror, earnest, generous friend of the inebriate, the con- devsted advocate of the sistent, temperance reform in all its stages of development, and the kind, to aid sympathising brother, ready by voice and act every form of suffering humanity." SIXTH THOUSAND. BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY. BRIGGS AND RICHAEDS, 456 WAsnujdTn.N (-'TKI:I:T, Con. ESSEX. NEW YORK I SHELDON, HLAKKMAN & C 0. 1862. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1859, by WILLIAM GEORGE HAWKINS, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts. LITHOTYPED BT COWLES AND COMPANY, 17 WASHINGTON ST., BOSTON. Printed by Geo. C. Rand and Ayery. MY GRANDMOTHER, WHOSE PRAYERS, UNINTERMITTED FOR MORE THAN FORTY" YEARS, HAVE, UNDER GOD, SAVED A SON, AND GIVEN TO HER NATIVE COUNTRY A PHILANTHROPIST, WHOSE MULTIPLIED DEEDS OF LOVE ARE EVERYWHERE TO BE SEEN, AND WHICH ARE HERE BUT IMPERFECTLY RECORDED, is $0lunu IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED 550333 PREFACE. THE compiler of this volume has endeavored to " obey the command taught him in his youth, Honor thy father," etc., etc. He has, therefore, turned aside for a brief period from his professional duties, to gather up some memorials of him whose life is here but imperfectly delineated. It has indeed been a la- bor of love how and ; faithfully judiciously performed must be left for others to say. The writer has sought to avoid multiplying his own words, preferring that the subject of this memoir and his friends should tell their own story.
  • Mimesis, Eros, and Mania on Platonic Originals

    Mimesis, Eros, and Mania on Platonic Originals

    1 Mimesis, Eros, and Mania On Platonic Originals PHILOSOPHICAL IMAGINATION AND THE MIDDLE Vico’s inspiring work reminds us of the importance of what he called the imaginative universal. An imaginative universal, of course, would strike many rationalistic philosophers as very odd. It will not so strike the person with even minimum exposure to the revelatory power of art. Vico not only gives our imagination wings, as Joyce said; he also had more wings than not a few philosophers. Think, for instance, of his opposite in spirit, Descartes. Or per- haps Hegel, whose version of speculative reason, one fears, betrays this inti- mate strangeness of being. One might say: a properly winged philosophical imagination knows this intimacy and this strangeness.1 Can the name “Plato” stand for that philosophical imagination? This too will seem odd, since Plato is taken as the implacable foe of the poets. But who has endowed the philo- sophical tradition more richly with its philosophical images, such as the Cave, the Sun, the winged soul, and so on? Do not these images present some of the imaginative universals of philosophy itself, to which thinkers return again and again, and not because they are deficient in speculative reason but 1. The admirable work of Donald Verene helped open my eyes to the importance of the imaginative universal in Vico. Verene has also awakened us to the philosophical importance of images in Hegel, and especially his Phenomenology, in Hegel’s Recollection: A Study of Images in the Phenomenology of Spirit (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985).